Author: Vyasji

I am a senior retired engineer in USA with a couple of masters degrees. Born and raised in the Vedic family tradition in Bhaarat. Thanks to the Vedic gurus and Sri Krishna, I am a humble Vedic preacher, and when necessary I serve as a Purohit for Vedic dharma ceremonies.

Know The Enemy: Congress’ Anti-Hindu, Unjust Bill. Thank God It Did Not Pass

From: Anand Sharma < >

For many years, Sonia Gandhi and the Congress were drafting a bill (mislabeled innocent looking “Communal Violence  Bill”), that would have made the  Hindus the most horribly tortured slaves.

The reason people do not know this is because Congress wanted to present the bill in 2013 winter session but, fortunately, because of opposition from BJP and some other parties, Congress ran out of time. So, people did not see the bill and do not know about it. Also, fortunately, Modi Ji and BJP won and this went out of radar but it is still in the veins of Congress and IT IS OUR SACRED DUTY TO NEVER LET THE ELECTORATE FORGET.

• For a detailed analysis of the bill, please see our white paper on the subject at the Dropbox link at the end. This was posted on the official BJP site in 2013. I heard that parts of it were used in the Parliament discussions against this bill but I have no official confirmation.

• ALTHOUGH THE ACTUAL BILL IS FAR WORSE, SOME PROVISIONS ARE LISTED BELOW:

The bill would have been effective going all the way back to 1950. Very conveniently, the bill was not applicable in J&K as Hindus are minority there and would have benefited.                                                                                                                                       

• Whenever, there are riots, it will be presumed that these are started by Hindus regardless of who started it. Only Hindus will be jailed with non-bailable warrants.
Any one from Muslim, Christian or SC/ST group can bring a charge against any Hindu—without evidence and without revealing his or her identity.


• The accused Hindu shall have to be immediately arrested as all offences under this bill are non- bailable and cognizable.


•     This law can be invoked only by a minority against Hindus.


•     The accused Hindu shall not be informed as to who has complained against him but the police have to inform the complainant about the progress of the case.


•     A minority is not required to give any evidence to support his complaints against Hindus.


.      Within a month, the property of the Hindu will be seized and given to complainant.


.      A minority cannot be punished for making even false complaints/ statements against Hindus.


•      A Hindu refusing to do business with any minority shall be immediately arrested [Sec 3 (f) (i)]. Taking advantage of such anti – Hindu laws, a minority can force a Hindu to sell /rent his property and even surrender his daughters to minorities.


•      The occurrence of organized communal and targeted violence under this act shall amount to an  internal disturbance in a state within the meaning of Article 355 entitling the central government to impose President’s Rule. Easy way for Muslims/Christians or SC/ST, to have a state government, they do not like, dissolved.


•      Hate propaganda is an offence against minority community and not otherwise.


ETC. ETC.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/6agpfe71y7hsrpk/White%20Paper%20on%20Communal%20Violence%20Bill_A%20Report%20by%20OFBJP%20USA%20Media%20Team.docx?dl=0

 

White Paper on Communal Violence Bill_A Report by OFBJP USA Media Team.docx

Shared with Dropbox

www.dropbox.com

Dharti Mata Ki Jaya! “Hind” ends at Khyber Pass, NOT at Wagah!

From: Rajpur  ,>

“Dharti Mata Ki Jaya!”

Yesterday (8 May 2020) VE Day was CELEBRATED across the United Kingdom. It was brought out again and again how Churchill inspired his people to resist the NAZI aggression to the last, how he warned against despair and defeat. That was the worst moment in history when the RETREATING British army was rescued from Dunkirk and German invasion seemed imminent.

(The evacuation of Allied soldiers during World War II from the beaches and harbor of Dunkirk, in the north of France, between 26 May and 4 June 1940.)

NOW to Bharat five years EARLIER (Pakistan Resolution, 23 March 1940), and seven years LATER (15 August 1947) to see the fate of “Akhand Bharat”.

We submit to Modiji with due respect and in all humility, “Sir, everything is all right for those in Gujrat, Maharashtra, UP and Bihar who are standing tall like Sardar Patel’s statue in Bharat. But ever thought of those whose Bharat “died” after betrayal, without even a proper funeral or Remembrance, who stand crestfallen, sad and mourning?”

“Sir, when you say, “Bharat Mata Ki Jaya”, those FORCED OUT from Sindh, East Bengal, West Punjab by the home-grown savages & barbarians, are reminded of the pain in their hearts recalling the dear relatives, friends and the sacred “Bharat Mata” they lost!

“FOR TENS OF MILLIONS OF US, former refugees in our own country, THAT WAS THE REAL “BHARAT MATA”. Today she is the brainchild of Jinnah and Nehru, with Gandhi as midwife.

“Noticing the lack of patriotism in our leaders then, and now, one is afraid that if THAT Bharat is not recovered, reinstated, or even recalled, then, according to us, it will still be “Bharat” when the country is reduced to Delhi and a few villages around it! One would still be shouting, “Bharat Mata ki Jaya!” without anyone raising eyebrows.

“Given such lack of attachment to “Akhand Bharat,” will it not be better to change it to “DHARTI MATA KI JAYA!”?

“To many this Bharat without LAHORE and East Bengal, is either meaningless, painful or a powder keg.

“Most Hindus, who do not incorporate the idea of AKHAND BHARAT in their visual imagery, are a puzzle to us if not despair and disappointment. You see, Sir, OUR Bharat is different from YOURS.

“OUR Bharat is far BEYOND Wagah and Atari. It is right up to KHYBER PASS. And we do not see this enshrined in the Constitution nor taught at schools in YOUR Bharat.

“None ought to put Gandhi & Nehru above Bharat. They both were clever BARRISTERS. Yet NEITHER said two words to Jinnah, “High Treason!”

“Nor did they point to TRANSFER OF POPULATION and nor even to the eternal INSECURITY & sense of BETRAYAL in the minds of the MUSLIMS staying back among the KAFIRS (infidels) in Bharat, who are bound to RETALIATE collectively one day!

“Is it not preposterous when Gandhi and Nehru were our TOP LEADERS and enjoyed our full trust and backing, they were negotiating the PARTITION of (Akhand) Bharat at the same time? Therefore, a lump of revulsion and rejection rises in the throats of all the Hindus who hail from Karachi, Quetta and Kohat and they would like the Lok Sabha to NAME & SHAME the “rats” who sat with the Viceroy to surrender our sacred “dharti” without consulting the PEOPLE.

“Obviously, Sir, “BHARAT” meant nothing to Nehru and Gandhi. Hence all their statues ought to be consigned to sea and places bearing the traitors’ names ought to be RE-NAMED.

“Therefore, we believe, Sir, that “DHARTI” is definitely a better choice for our sloganeering than “Bharat”!

“We “dumped” (Akhand) Bharat in 1947. From now onwards let it be “Dharti Mata Ki Jaya.” And when we greet with “Jai Hind”, let it be known to each and every member of LOK SABHA that “Hind” ends at Khyber Pass, NOT at Wagah!

“Sir you may not dissolve Pakistan in one day as it was created. But surely you can succeed in this national resolve in a thousand years. And that ought to be enshrined in the NEW Constitution for our sacred “dharti Mata”!

rajput

9 May 2020

PS:  Please honour the sentiments and the sacred memory of all those who PERISHED in 1947 on account of BETRAYAL by Gandhi and Nehru. They deserve an even TALLER statue than Sardar Patel’s. The nation is SEVENTY-THREE years behind on this sacred duty.

 

मनुस्मृति स्वाध्याय भाग-34, अपने गुण-स्वभाव की लडकी से ही करें विवाह। Manusmriti By Ankur Arya

 

 

Tragedy of Raja Dahir, Hindu King of Baluchistan

Tragedy of Raja Dahir, Hindu King of Baluchistan

From: Mahabelshwar Deshpande < >

Raja Dahir, The Last Hindu Ruler of Sindh who defeated Muhammed Bin Qasim Thrice in a war & prevented him from entering India.
Yeps! Today we’ll know more about one of the bravest hindu king whose story is missing from the history books of India.
▪️ Raja Dahir, born in 663 AD was the last Hindu ruler of Sindh and parts of the Punjab in present-day Pakistan, in the northern region of the Indian subcontinent. He was a Pushkarna Brahmin king, son of Chach of Aror, who ascended throne after the death of his uncle, Chandar.
▪️ Raja Dahir’s original name was Raja Dahir Sen. His wife’s name was Ladi. The couple had three children’s — elder daughter named Suryadevi, and the younger daughter named Premadevi/Pirmaldevi and a son named Jaisiah.
▪️ Raja Dahir’s dynasty ruled over the parts of the present day Afghanistan, Balochistan, Pakistan, parts of Punjab, and Iran.
▪️ Dahir’s kingdom was invaded by Ramal at Kannauj. After initial losses, the enemy advanced on Aror and he allied himself with Alafi, an Arab.
▪️  Alfai and his warriors had actually been exiled from the Umayaad Caliphate, but he recruited them. They were part of Dahir’s armies to repel the invading forces, and he remained as the valued members of Dahir’s court.
▪️ However, in the later war, Alafi served as the military advisor but didn’t take part in the campaign. He was thus pardoned from the caliph.
▪️ According to the Chach Nama, the oldest chronicles of Arab conquest of Sindh, the primary reason for this invasion started when a pirate raided off the coast of Debal, the valuables of which were stolen from the king of Serendib (present day Sri Lanka).
▪️ Upon hearing the matter, Hajjaj ibn Yusuf, the governor of Basra, who served the Umayyad Caliphate wrote a letter to Raja, and when a compromise couldn’t be reached, he launched a military expedition.
▪️ The other reasons have been attributed to the interest in part of Umayyad to get hold of Makran, Balochistan and Sindh region to protect their maritime interests.
▪️ Various armies from Sindh alongside Persian fought in the battles of Nahawand, Salasal, and Qadisiyyah, and thus, granted the refuge to fleeing rebel chieftains.
▪️ There’s another story which tells that Al-Hajjaj’s decision to send the powerful battalion was commanded by his nephew, Muhammad Bin Qasim, which was considered to be a revengeful act.
▪️ It was because Raja Dahir had refused to hand over some Arab exiles who had fallen out of favor with Hajjaj and had sought asylum in Sindh.
Before going to war with with the Umayyads, Raja Dahir said to his Family & army, ❝I am going to meet the Arabs in the open battle, and fight them as best as I can. If I crush them, my kingdom will then be put on a firm footing. But if I am killed honourably, the  the event  will be recorded. in the books of Arabia and India, and will be talked about by great men. It will be heard by other kings in the world, and it will be said that Raja Dahir of Sindh sacrificed his precious life for the sake of his country, in fighting with the enemy.❞
▪️ In 711 BCE, Qasim attacked Debal. The policy was in fact enlisting and co-opting support from defectors, and which defeated lords and forces.
▪️ After the successful invasion of Debal, Qasim moved to Nerun for supplies. The city’s Buddhist governor acknowledged it to be the tributary state of Caliphate, and after the first campaign, he capitulated to bin Qasim.
▪️ Bin Qasim had the support of various other local tribes such as Jats, Meds, Bhuttos, Buddhist rulers of Nerun, Bajhra, Kaka Kolak, Siwistan. And with the strong support, he defeated Dahir and captured the eastern territories for Umayyad Caliphate.
▪️ Dahir was defeated due to the treachery of his friends, As the eastern territory was taken away and merged into Umayyad Caliphate. This was a great blow to Dahir. But he did not give up.
▪️ He wanted to protect his Hindu kingdom and tried again. He called all his friends, army chiefs and held a secret meeting. In this meeting Dahir’s Cabinet Minister suggested that he should take refuge under one of the friendly kings of India. Dahir did not accept it.
▪️ It is also said, then the Minister suggested that he should send away his family to friendly Indian kingdom. Dahir became furious at this suggestion and he thought what will happen to his friendly Thakurs and Nobles.
▪️ “I cannot do this. Tomorrow not only me but my entire dynasty will be branded as a traitor’s family. This is against the tradition of India. Hence I will not resort to this,” Raja Dahir said.
▪️ Dahir had made attempts after attempts to prevent Qasim to cross the River so that he couldn’t force his armies into the eastern bank. Unfortunately for Dahir, Wasim crossed the river and defeated forces at Jitor led by Jaisiah (Dahir’s son).
▪️ Dahir then had to fight Qasim at Raor (which is near modern Nawabshah) in 712, and in the battle, Qasim killed Dahir. When he was killed, his head was cut off and sent to Hajjaj bin Yousuf.  Thus even a respectful cremation was denied.