Comment by M P:
Taufeeq Killed Nikita for refusing proposal His Grandfather Kabir Ahmad Ex MLA Cousin Aftab A Ex Congress MLA Uncle Khurshid A Ex Home Minister of Haryana Uncle Javed A contested election on BSP ticket This is how he got courage to do so even after 2 Police complaints by Girl #JusticeForNikita
The reasons for the fast-rising communal tension in India and abroad was elaborately explained in the judicial verdict pronounced by Z.S. Lohat, Metropolitan Magistrate of Delhi on 31 July 1986, in a case under IPC sections 153-A and 295-A filed by Delhi police against two Hindus, Indra Sain Sharma and Rajkumar Arya, for publishing and circulating a poster in Hindi citing 24 ayats of the Quran under the caption, ‘Why Riots Take Place in the Country’.
The ayats cited in the poster were taken verbatim from an authentic edition of the Quran translated in Hindi and published by a Muslim scholar, Mohammed Farooq Khan of Maktaba al-Hasnat of Rampur in Uttar Pradesh.
In his book, Farooq Khan author provided the original Arabic text of the Quran, along with Hindi and English translations reproduced in parallel columns. On the basis of a complaint lodged with the police, the two Hindu activists were arrested and charged under Sections 153-A and 295-A of the Indian Penal Code for claiming that riots were caused by 24 ayats of the Quran which commanded the Muslims to fight against the followers of other religions. The ayats of Quran cited by the two accused persons were 9.5, 9.28, 4.101, 9.123, 4.56, 9.23, 9.37, 5.5, 33.61, 21.98, 32.22, 48.20, 8.69, 66.9, 41.27, 41.28, 9.111, 9.58, 8.65, 5.51, 9.29, 5.14, 4.89 and 9.14.
The poster further added that
“there are numerous other ayats of the same sort. Here we have cited only twenty-four ayats. Obviously these ayats carry commandments which promote enmity, ill-will, hatred, deception, fraud, strife, robbery and murder. That is why riots take place between Muslims and non-Muslims in this country as well as (the rest of) the world…In the above mentioned twenty-four ayats of the Quran Majid, Mussalmans are commanded to fight against the followers of other faiths. So long as these ayats are not removed (from the Quran), riots in the country cannot be prevented.
On behalf of the government the Assistant Public Prosecutor argued that the ayats at serial No. 2,5,9, 11 to 19 and at serial No.22 in the poster were either not in the Quran, or that they were distorted version of the ayats in the Quran. The accused, however, rebutted the arguments of the government prosecutor and asserted that the ayats cited by them were part of the Quran and had been taken verbatim from the book of Mohammed Farooq Khan and these do exhort the Muslims to fight against the followers of other faiths. They submitted that so long as these ayats continued to be part of the Quran Majeed, communal riots in India cannot be prevented.
The judicial verdict clearly endorsed the view that certain ayats in the Quran have the potential to create communal violence. No appeal was filed against the historic judgment by the leaders of the Muslim community.
After hearing both sides and discussing their arguments, the learned Metropolitan Magistrate discharged the two Hindus, Inder Sain Sharma and Rajkumar, on the ground that prima facie there was no case made out against them. No charge could be framed against the two accused persons because the ayats reproduced in the poster were found to be true and correctly reproduced. The learned Magistrate stated in his order,
“I have personally compared the disputed ayats with Quran Majeed (translated in Hindi) with notes by one Mohd Farookh Khan and found that the most of the ayats have been reproduced in the poster in the original form as is available in the Quran Majeed”.
The learned Magistrate concluded,
“In view of the above discussion, I am therefore of the view that there is no prima facie case against the accused as the offences alleged against the accused do not fall prima facie within the four corners of Sections 153-A /295-A.”
The aforesaid judicial verdict clearly endorsed the view that certain ayats in the Quran have the potential to create communal violence. It is a matter of record that no appeal was filed against the historic judgment by the leaders of the Muslim community on whose complaint the two Hindus were arrested and prosecuted by the police. Apparently they knew very well that their holy book did preach hatred and violence against non-Muslims and for that reason they dared not challenge the judicial verdict by appealing to the High Court. Equally important is the fact that the Delhi government, too, did not think it prudent to file an appeal against the judgment and allowed the judicial truth to remain on record unchallenged.
It is high time that the partisan secularists and media anchors read the aforesaid historical judgment and the relevant ayats of the Holy Quran to understand the real cause of the growing cult of communal violence, even after partition of the country.
Ram Ohri is a former IPS officer and writes regularly on security issues, demographics, and occasionally, on policy.
We Hindus must make Bhaarat a Hindu Raajya (State), not secular; where Islam will be illegal.
Comment by Viput Pathak
मेरे भी मुस्लिम मित्र हैं।
मेरे भी क्लास में मुस्लिम पढ़े हैं।
मेरे भी आफिस में मुस्लिम काम करते हैं।
मैं जहाँ से सामान लेती हूं वहां मुस्लिम भी सामान लेते हैं।
मैं जहां रहती हूं वहाँ भी मुस्लिम रहते है…।।
वो कहते है, हम जुम्मे की नमाज पढ़ेंगे, सड़को पर…।
मैंने भी कहा कोई बात नहीं, संविधान ने सबको धार्मिक आजादी का हक़ दिया है।
~वो~ कहते है हम मांस खायेंगे, अब वो बकरे का हो या गाय का…।
मैंने कहा कोई बात नही, संविधान ने सबको हक़ दिया है कुछ भी खाने पीने का ।
अब मैंने कहा, “कॉमन सिविल कोड” आना चाहिए।
तो वो बोला नही, ये ~इस्लाम~ के खिलाफ है।
मैंने कहा, “बहुपत्नी प्रथा बंद हो।”
तो वो बोला, _ये ~इस्लाम~ के खिलाफ है।
मैंने कहा, “जनसंख्या रोकथाम के लिए कानून बनना चाहिए।”
तो वो बोला, ये ~इस्लाम~ ले खिलाफ है।
मैंने कहा, “तलाक़ सिर्फ कोर्ट में हो।”
तो वो बोला, ये ~कुरान~ का अपमान है।
मैंने बोला, “बांग्लादेशियों को वापस भेजना चाहिए।”
वो बोला, वो हमारे ~मुस्लिम~ भाई है।
मैंने कहा, “रोहिंग्या को वापस भेजो।”
वो बोला, ~वो~ हमारे भाई है।
मैंने बोला, “राम मंदिर बनना चाहिए।”
वो बोला, कहीं भी बना लो पर अयोधया में नहीं.. वहां ~बाबरी मस्जिद~ बनेगी।
मैंने बोला, “कश्मीरी पंडितों को उनका घर मिलना चाहिए।”
वो बोला, कश्मीर को आजादी दो।
मैंने कहा, “मदरसे बंद हो, सबको समान शिक्षा मिले।”
वो बोला, ये ~इस्लाम~ का अपमान है।
मैंने बोला, “मोदी ने ये अच्छा किया।” वो बोला, मोदी ~मुसलमानों~ का हत्यारा है।
मैंने बोला, “बंगाल में हिन्दू के साथ गलत हो रहा है।”
वो बोला, ~दीदी~ ने बहुत विकास किया है।
मैंने बोला, “सारे आतंकवादियों को गोली मार देनी चाहिए।”
वो बोला, सुधरने का 1 मौका दो।
मैंने कहा, “हमारे 3 मंदिर अयोध्या, मथुरा, काशी वापस दो।”
उसने कहा, कैसे दे.. वो तो हमारी मस्जिद है?
भाई . . . .सारे मुसलमान एक ही होते है।
जहां कम है, वहां तुम्हारे भाई है।
पर जहां ज्यादा है.. वहां आप सोच भी नही सकते।
जहां कम है, वहां सॉफ्ट है।
जहां ज्यादा है, वहां रोज हिन्दू मर रहे है।
जहां कम है, वहां उन्हें आपसे रोजगार मिलता है.. इसलिए आपके दोस्त है।
मुसलमान एक जैसे ही होते है। अंधकार में न रहें.
🚩जय श्री राम🚩