॥ॐ नमो भगवते वासुदेवाय॥ Dharma & Rashtra Seva; Vedic awakening; Hindu State will be a nation where everyone will strive to advance spiritually. ===Seeking a website IT volunteer who can make this site beautiful and attractive, get more traffic on this site, is a staunch Hindu, loves Bhaarat, and desires to make Bhaarat a Vedic State. Please contact Suresh Vyas at skanda987@gmial.com
From: Rajput < >
From: Gurvinder Singh < >
Comment: The Muslims led by Jinnah demanded partition by threatening for a civil war; and also under DIRECT Action began killing Hindus in large numbers. The Hindus, hypnotized by MK Gandhi, agreed unwillingly. – Suresh Vyas)
|
|
Rich in every aspect, India is a land that has always been coveted by every power and wealth hungry empire and despot. Empires came and went plundering what they could, but it was the wily British who institutionalised it for exploitation. The British lost the 4 major wars it fought with the Sikhs and the Afghanistan and eventually Afghanistan became a buffer state between the two empires. |
|
Compelled by the Americans as per the Atlantic Charter a reluctant Britain had to give up its colonies and set the lands free after the end of the second World War. Britain wanted to retain bases with troops and equipment in India to prevent such an eventuality. Both Nehru and Gandhi flatly turned that request down. On the other hand Muhammad Ali Jinnah an astute man with a much better understanding of geopolitics readily accepted the request unconditionally. There was however, a small problem, Jinnah’s voice had almost no say in the Congress party. The problem was easily solved, partition India into a Hindu majority Secular India and a Muslim majority Pakistan and appoint Jinnah the Prime Minister of Pakistan. Pakistan is the area that was contiguous with Afghanistan and where Britain wanted to have bases and troops, thus create an openly pro British buffer state. The die was cast, now to implant the plan. The British government had given a mandate to Mountbatten to grant India independence by July 1948. Suddenly the plan was in danger. British intelligence had reliable information that Muhammad Ali Jinnah was suffering from tuberculosis and unlikely to survive another year. Then there was the question, ‘what if the people of India and Pakistan decide to reunite?’ After all barring the occasional riot the people of all religions and communities within British India lived in relative harmony. So not only was partition essential to post independence British plans but to do so in such a manner that they would remain bitterly divided for a long time. The demarcation of the boundary between India and Pakistan was given to two teams of eminent lawyers uninformed, unadvised and unsuitable for the great task as boundary commissions. The notorious and ill fated demarcated line came to be known as the Radcliffe line. |
|
Sir. Cyril Radcliffe an English lawyer was summoned and assigned the job of trisecting most of India. He was appointed chairman of the two boundary commissions (One for Bengal and one for Panjab). It is shocking to know, that Radcliffe had never visited India earlier, never read about or studied India until he was assigned the task. He was given just 5 weeks to complete the assignment. Arriving in India on July 8th 1947 he spent two weeks in bed recovering from ‘Delhi Belly'( a bad case of dysentery). Radcliffe merely rubber stamped a plan that had been given to him by British authorities. We shall never know for certain, because Radcliffe destroyed all papers and records related with the decision of partition and he never spoke about it for the rest of his life. _______________________ |
Independence was granted at midnight on 15th August 1947. Then the exact map of Partition of India was announced on 17th August 1947. India had been partitioned into 626 parts. India, East Pakistan, West Pakistan and 623 independent kingdoms. It was a disaster for the Indians. Many Indians found themselves on the wrong side of the boundary and now prey to violent gangs intent on spreading terror, looting, raping and destroying. Mountbatten who had promised law and order in the transition was inactive and silent. He let India burn, which many suspect was deliberate or gross incompetence. It seems evident, that the wily British had deliberately created a mess. They had the mischievous intent, to create enough long lasting problems in the Indian sub-continent to pave the way for Britain’s return to rule and dominate India once again sometime in the future. Many people like to believe independence is mainly because of the trio of Gandhi ji and Nehru and Jinnah that got India and Pakistan freedom. Though this opinion is widespread it is grossly untrue. It disrespects the blood, sweat and tears contributed by countless Indians, and even some Britishers and foreigners. The role of America was key. |
|
Though Louis Mountbatten the Viceroy of India had time till June 1948 to complete the partition and grant India freedom, he used a butcher’s knife to tear out the soul of a people bound by centuries old shared culture and history. Unclassified Russian documents reveal that Russia never had plans to invade India. Pakistan by becoming a key partner of the Americans and British, evolved into a footstool for any power that would pay it mercenary fees and give it international support for all its mischief and terrorist activities. Pakistan never learnt to exercise independence and remains independent only in name. Pakistan is now a failed Pariah state dependent only on a Communist China which is slowly sucking out whatever vitality is left. |
![]() |
|
Written and Posted: Aug 2020 ~ Gurvinder Singh – to earmark Indian Independence Day 15 August Engage – Articles – Website Ref: G0626 |
|
Interesting links. |
|
Note: |
From: Rajput < >
FIVE CONDITIONS OF PARTITION
(“PANCH SHEEL” OF NEHRU)
HINDU RESPONSE was Surrender unconditional, and RUN.
Response by Indian Armed Forces: ZERO. They, too, packed up in utmost haste and vanished from their own territory.
In 1940 we had All-India Congress Party in the league with All-India Muslim League that was suddenly thrown into limelight by the British rulers who believed in the policy of “Divide & Rule”.
It was the separatist Muslims who had thought of creating an Islamic country within India as early as 1936 when a few Muslim students in London coined the word “Pakistan”. To the discredit of Hindu leaders none took a serious note of the new destructive idea that started growing rapidly like poisonous weed among the Indian Muslims.
After the end of World War 2 in August 1945 the seed had grown full height into a poisonous tree.
While senile “Bapu” MK Gandhi lived in his own make-believe unrealistic world of “Hindu-Muslim Bhai Bhai”, it was cunning Jawaharlal Nehru who stepped in the vacuum and began to seriously represent India at the so-called “Independence” talks that ended in PARTITION, that is, the mutilation of (Akhand) Bharat.
Nehru’s conduct needs a closer scrutiny. That he never mentioned to Mohammed Ali Jinnah, the leader of Indian Muslims, “United We Stand, Divided We Fall,”, is no more a mystery. Nehru was literally the “Son of a Mohammed” himself, and his job was tough and dangerous: to destroy the Hindu nation from within by agreeing to break up India while at the same time projecting himself as a champion of Secularism and an indomitable freedom fighter. Hindus swallowed his High Treason hook line and sinker. None pointed finger of betrayal or treason at him. Such were the slavish subservient times!
Hindus have never dared to look at their rulers with a critical eye since the first Hindu critic had his eyes gouged out before being beheaded in public by the Mohammedan invaders from Arabia in 712 AD. Thereafter it was the British who shot and hanged the critics of regime in their thousands. Thus a tradition set in to blindly follow the one in front like the sheep approaching the edge of the precipice.
How wide awake could the Hindu nation have been in 1940’s can be judged even today in 2012 AD, from their dog like loyalty towards, and blind faith, in the corrupt anti national Italian born Sonia Maino Gandhi who is called the “uncrowned Empress of Hindusthan”.
Nehru himself had described the state of patriotism and awareness of the Hindus more accurately than anyone else. When an aide pointed out the possibility of a patriot firing a shot at him if he agreed to Partition, he quipped, “Hindus will not only accept Partition but also celebrate it, giving me the credit for their Independence!” The aide was left speechless.
Haven’t we often wondered as to what the terms and conditions of Partition really were? Shame, if we haven’t!
“We wish there were some, or at least one!”, replied a Hindu professor of history.
And what would that have been if there was to be just ONE condition?
“Expel the devils lock stock and Koran from Partitioned India,” said his wife instantly as if by reflex action.
But there were conditions, though not from Nehru or Gandhi, the leaders of Hindusthan and the sons of soil, but from the leader of the MUSLIMS, Mohammed Ali Jinnah.
Offensive and preposterous though they were, our perennial ENEMY met with no resistance, challenge or fight from the HINDU side.
Neither Nehru nor Gandhi mentioned exchange of population or Referendum. Neither did they demand time to comprehend the future implications of Partition for the Muslims in Bharat and the Hindus who would be trapped in Pakistan, or, merely to think it over.
The conditions that were then dictated were fully backed and endorsed by Britain, our colonial master, and, astonishingly, accepted by Gandhi, Nehru and their “All-India Congress Party” that claimed to represent ALL the Indians throughout the country-from Kashmir to Kerala and from Khyber to Chittagong.
Demoralised Hindu & Sikh leaders, who became even more self-negating and self-sacrificing “secular goats” under Gandhi’s influence, held their breath while cancer eaten “skeleton” of Mohammed Ali Jinnah proclaimed his conditions, one by one. (Jinnah died an agonising death in Karachi on 11 September 1948, just over a year after Pakistan’s creation. We ought to reflect on his company in Hell.)
At that critical juncture in our history Jawaharlal Nehru was correctly noticed by some smart Hindus to be the illegitimate son of a Muslim, the secret agent of Anglo-Islamic Axis, who stood solidly on the side of Jinnah.
Nehru never uttered a single word to support “Akhand Bharat” as if our ancient land of Vedas and wisdom was a mere rag bag. With Nehru turned into an enemy, the full brunt of fighting Partition fell on “Bapu” Gandhi who had already shown his commitment to non-violence, conciliation, appeasement and, therefore, unconditional surrender.
This put the Hindus in extremely vulnerable and dangerous position. Mohammed Ali Jinnah had his Pakistan in his hand and our Hindusthan under his foot.
Emboldened by British support, Jinnah’s dictation to all the Hindu leaders seemed like one determined cat addressing the vast assembly of rats.
FIVE CONDITIONS OF PARTITION:
1. LOCAL (not overall) MAJORITY. “Wherever we are in majority that territory will belong to our Rasul Allah Mohammed of Mecca, in perpetuity. You will surrender all that land unconditionally.”
“Yes, Sir, we agree. Pray carry on,” said Gandhi and Nehru, listening meekly.
2. CONSTITUTION
“For those territories that you surrender we shall write up, and enforce, ISLAMIC Constitution that will be based on the teachings of KORAN. We shall treat all the KAFIRS, i.e., Non Muslims, as prescribed in The Book.”
“Yes, Sir, we agree. Pray carry on,” said Gandhi and Nehru meekly, trembling while listening.
3. HOLOCAUST OF HINDUS.
We reserve the right to carry out total ethnic cleansing of Hindus and Sikhs by murdering, abducting, raping millions and expelling tens of millions from their homes, degrading them in our ISLAMIC Pakistan by denying them EQUALITY with the Muslims who will be free to rape a non-Muslim female and if she complains, she will be required to produce FOUR male witnesses to support her accusation. You will watch like the sheep in abattoir your fellow Hindus killed in Kashmir, East Bengal, Sindh, even Uganda and Fiji, but do nothing while silently waiting for your own turn. In the case of all mixed marriages, the non-Muslim spouse will embrace Islam at once, or face DEATH.”
“Yes, Sir, we agree. Pray carry on,” said Gandhi and Nehru meekly, listening.
4. SPECIAL RIGHTS FOR MUSLIMS IN “BROKEN” BHARAT
“Thou shalt not touch the whiskers of a Mohammed in Hindusthan. Your government will undertake to safeguard life and property of each and every Muslim citizen while we reserve the right to do ethnic cleansing in accordance with the Will of Allah. In cinemas NO Hindu actor will be seen doing any love scene or dance with a Muslim actress while Muslim actors will have full freedom to dance, kiss, play, strip & bare (naked) any Hindu actress.”
“Yes, Sir, we agree. Pray, hurry up. We need to start breathing.” said Gandhi and Nehru meekly, holding their breath.
5. TERRITORIAL ENCROACHMENT. Finally let it be clear upon you that any territory or land that is once under the foot of Mohammed (i.e., “Islamic”), will belong to MOHAMMED of MECCA in perpetuity. Any territory or land that is once ours will never be yours. Accordingly, not only West Pakistan but also East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) and any part of Kashmir captured by us, will remain ISLAMIC for ever.”
“Yes, Sir, we agree. Thank you,” said Gandhi and Nehru, mighty relieved that the Islamic “PANCHSHEEL” had come to an end and they could breathe normally once again.
YES, the lives of our despicable cowardly “netas” had been spared though MILLIONS of ordinary citizens of Bharat lost theirs as a direct result of “buying peace” from the Devil.
It was like Chamberlain’s “Peace with Honour” agreement with HITLER in 1938.
Hindusthan, known as “Bharat Mata”, or “Mother India”, shrank in size and acquired her most disgusting map outline. Nehru was an accomplice while Gandhi had “bought” his peace. The new “Islamic” border sliced through the grand provinces, BENGAL and PUNJAB, and the Princely State of JAMMU & KASHMIR.
Dear honourable & patriotic citizens of Bharat and NRI’s across the world, this then is the Truth, nothing else but the TRUTH, behind that word “Independence” that the Government of India, especially “All-India Congress Party” and all those who form part of the EVIL AXIS of “Italy, Islam, Nehru Dynasty & the Hindu slaves” celebrate year after year on August 15.
It is up to us (and our genuine leaders) to encourage the entire brainwashed and demoralised nation to become bold and brave in order to revive our stand on “Akhand Bharat”.
It is up to us to open our eyes and see the Truth. It is up to us to demand a TRIAL of Jinnah, Nehru and Gandhi for HIGH TREASON. Such trial can never be time barred like the trial of Bofors Chor.
It is up to the PEOPLE of India to unite and then become a MIGHTY FORCE to reckon with.
Shedding the traits of “jackals” but acquiring the guts of “lions” we all should step forward and exterminate the anti Hindu, anti secular and anti national “vermin” who have been ruling and fooling our great nation of one billion since the Day of Partition in 1947.
Partition was the DEATH of our cherished “Akhand Bharat” (Divine Mother India).
Who on earth is such despicable scum (“ZALEEL”) to “celebrate” the death of his mother?
Accordingly, on August 15 next, there should be nationwide BLACK FLAG rallies and black ribbons to remind us of the worst defeat and surrender in our history, and then to rejuvenate the supine nation to recover the surrendered territory and march towards the goal of “RAAM RAAJYA”.
PS: WE INVITE THE “INDIAN” MUSLIMS TO UNITE, DEMONSTRATE PATRIOTISM AND “INVADE” PAKISTAN & BANGLADESH BY LITERATURE, IN ORDER TO RESTORE “AKHAND BHARAT”(PRE-PARTITION INDIA).
—–Original Message—–
From: Krishan K Punchhi < >
Sent: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 19:13
Subject: Re: Controversial Ram Mandir inauguration in Ayodhya, Should the Sikh Leadership be a part of it?
A couple of things I just remembered.
Not a single Guru sahib has said or written anywhere that Sikhism is a separate Dharam. It was only Sikh panth, like bhakti panth or dadu panth!! When Hari Mandir (Golden Temple) was built, it housed the traditional hindu sacred books as well as Sikh sacred books which came later. When the sikhs decided to become separate, the Hindu leader Pt Madan Mohan Malviya moved out with all hindu sacred books rather than have an argument and fight. Hari Mandir now became Harmandar Saheb. A new temple was built outside Amritsar. It was called Durgiana Mandir and it was a copy of Golden Temple, minus the gold. Durga was a name of Mata Vaishno Devi.
In my maternal ancestral village, we had no mandir or gurdwara. All books were kept and given due respect in a Dharamsaal. Later on, a mandir and a gurdwara were created.
The tenth guru, Govind Rai ji, created panj pyare, gave them the names of Singh (Lions !!) and then requested them to make him also a Singh. He was thus named Govind Singh.
Let there be no doubt. Hindus and Sikhs belong to the same family !!
Regards and best wishes…………. KKP.
On Friday, August 7, 2020, 01:06:01 p.m. EDT, Krishan K Punchhi < > wrote:
The great Guru Govind Singh ji got his inspiration for kirpan from Mata Vaishno Devi, who carries a kirpan for destroying the paapis. She has many names like Vaishno Devi, Bhagwati, Shakti etc. The tenth Guru included her name in the Sikh ardas which now started as ” Pratham Bhagwati simar ke, Nanak naam dhiyaye….. “.
My family used to make the eldest son into a sikh. I have many Sikh relatives !!………Regards Krishan Kumar Punchhi.
On Friday, August 7, 2020, 11:20:30 a.m. EDT, rsingh305 via Patriots Forum < > wrote:
Mananiya Shri Chelvapila,
Thank you very much for describing the reality so well and exposing the evil designs of our enemies who stand to gain by creating divisions within the Hindu nation.
I find your writings full of wisdom and truth that need to be circulated widely. An average citizen may not realize that there is not only STRENGTH but also SURVIVAL in unity. The COMMON enemy that captured Delhi has eyes on SRINAGAR, and finally on DELHI.
The martial song composed by Guru Gobind Singhji was perfectly suited for our FIGHTERS then who resisted the Mogul rule. It is now perfectly suitable for the Bharatiya Army of today.
Credit goes to Shri Modi who is showing conviction (and PRIDE) in NATIVE traditions, values and literature.
This is a very healthy trend and needs to be encouraged rapidly and universally.
regards
rajput
7 August 2020
—–Original Message—–
Sent: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 15:40
Subject: Re: Controversial Ram Mandir inauguration in Ayodhya, Should the Sikh Leadership be a part of it?
Sri Rama Jayam
Dear Sri R Singh,
Thanks, you said it well. Sikhs not only should be part of renovation, rebuilding of Sri Rama temple in Ayodhya but also should take important roles subsequently as well.
This schism between Hindus and Sikhs is despicable. Throughout history, as you know, it did not exist. Only with dawn of modern era starting with British imperialists, their agent, Macauliff Singh, writing and canvassing started bogus division. The Hindu-Sikh split is as fraudulent as two nation theory that was used to divide India.
The Hindu families’ eldest son grew to be a Sikh while rest remained Hindu. Sikhs, Hindus then in those days did not feel separate nor were there any practical, theoretical divisions. Until recently there was also temple for Shakti at Golden temple.
Great Guru Govind Singh wrote Ramayana in Sanskrit, he followed Valmiki in this regard. When he took out his sword at the start of Khalsa, he asserted that the sword is Durga and she is calling for sacrifices, five Hindus from different parts of India, stood up. Each one taken into the tent, while Guru returned with blood stained sword. Everyone thought that the five gave their life for a greater cause than themselves. It was at that time, Guru brought all five into open, had them seated while he washed their feet. Khalsa was born.
Hindus and Sikhs with no distinctions, were soldiers of Khalsa that was born as a result of people of India, Hindus to be specific.
For instance, Banda Bairagi becoming Banda Singh Bahadur well illustrated the oneness and unbreakable bonds between the two communities.
Banda Singh Bahadur – Wikipedia
Born as Lachman Dev, became a Hindu ascetic at age of 15, becoming Banda Bairagi, met Guru Govind Singh became Sikh warrior well known as Banda Saheb. He won many wars.
People of India in general did not know about sinister dynasty politics that encouraged schism which in turn sadly brought splits , encouraged every difference as a separatist barrier, disturbed much the spirit of unity that always sustained by Gurus, self-sacrificing heroes from all walks of life, all regions while at the same time observing their own different ways yet unlike in any other part of the world, India that was Bharath retained union. And will undoubtedly do so for all times to come, notwithstanding short-sighted shibboleths being thrown at most noble endeavor of bringing back Surya Vamsi Sri Rama along with his entourage to the magnificent temple He once had in Ayodhya.
Guru Govind Singh in his book Vichitra Natak, cosmic drama wrote an autobiography. He traced his as well as Guru Nanak’s origin from two sons of Sri Rama, Lava and Kusa. Please listen to patriotic song written from Guru Govind Singh. He did not commit any lapses of viewing Hindus Sikhs separate.
Indian Patriotic Song on words of 10th Sikh Guru, Guru Gobind Singhji by Brigade of Guards Army Band
YouTube
Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke at auspicious time of starting rebuilding Sri Rama Temple in Ayodhya, every word he said ought to be part of text books in India especially from childhood so that at least coming generations will be free from cobwebs of confusion woven by enemies of India to fragment India which will never happen again.
You said it right, happy to repeat it;
“Should the Sikh Leadership be a part of it?” (Subject line).
“YES, MOST CERTAINLY.”
Sat Sri Akal Har Har Mahadev Jai Sri Rama Vandemataram
Best wishes,
G V Chelvapilla