ॐ Hinduu Nation ॐ

Muslims feels they getting a rough deal

भारत के काफिरों – संविधान बदलो बदलो बदलो!

Five Defects of Democratic Constitutions

By Suresh Vyas

Democracy means a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives. It is a government for the people and by the people of a country. The people draft a constriction, and then agree to live by it.

The defects in most constitutions of the current democratic countries are:

1. Protection of minorities
2. Freedom of religion
3. Separate laws for different groups of people
4. Majority (even if unrighteous) rules
5. Human Rights

Each of the above is discussed below.

• The constriction says to protect the minority, but a minority can be righteous or unrighteous, tolerant or intolerant, divine, or demoniac, etc. There is no need to protect unrighteous, intolerant, or demoniac group whether a minority or majority. In a healthy body, a cancer cell is a minority. To protect it (let it live in the body) is suicidal. Same for a nation.
• The constitution assumes that all religions are equally good. This is not correct. Some religions are not tolerant of any other faiths, and constantly act to wipe out other religions and cultures from the world. Islam and Christianity are such religions. In contrast, the Vedic dharma is universal religion for mankind. Any two religions can be objectively compared to see which religion has higher potential to cause peace at personal to national and global level. Universal criteria for comparing religions is stated at below site:

https://hinduunation.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/religions-and-religious-freedom_paper.pdf

The constitution needs to say that all tolerant religions will be legal, and intolerant (I mean respectful to religion of the nation) will be illegal.

• In one country there cannot be separate laws for separate groups. The Muslims always have asked for separate law—Sharia—for them, separate prayer rooms, etc. This cannot be allowed in non-Muslim countries.

On a related point, the government should not favor—give benefits—to any group over other group. This is discrimination. E.g. in Hindustan the gov’t has special quotas and benefits for so called “dalits” or oppressed group of people. Such favors backfire, because the dalits (the shudras) want to remain dalits for ever to rip the free benefits even when no one is oppressing them. Instead of favoring dalits, the gov’t should punish those who oppress others. The Hindus need to understand this:

The Vedic society is made of four varNas: Brahmins (the spiritually intellectual class), Kshatriyas (the protectors of the society), the vaishyas (the traders), and the shudras (so called dalits now for mean political purpose) who provide labor and service to society. Now according to Bhagavad Gita and the Vedas, this varNa I defined by one’s guNa (qualities) and karma (one’s actions and aptitudes). It is not defined by one’s birth. Additionally, dharma does not tell that a varNa should oppress or hate any other varNa. So, the gov’t needs to force the Hindus to live per the Vedic dharma, and stop providing quotas and benefits to dalits.

• Majority Rules. If the majority people are less intelligent, or barbaric, or greedy, or criminals, or violent, they will rule. Such governments, e.g. that of Pakistan, cause suffering for themselves and for other countries. The majority need to have wisdom to elect those who are really intelligent, capable, and righteous leaders.
• Human Rights: The democracies (their constitutions) assume that anyone with a human body is human. Accordingly, the demoniac people, e.g. Hitler, Idi Amin, Mafias, terrorists, Human Traffickers, etc. are all humans. The Veda, however, does not agree to such a definition of a human. The Vedic scripture says:

aahaara in.ndraa bhaya maithunam cha

saamaanyam etad pashubirnaraaNaam

It says eating, sleeping, self-protecting, and mating are common between men and animals.  Animals do not do anything more than that.  So, if a person being does that only, then he/she is an animal.

Below is an evidence from Rig Veda that at birth one is not a human.

तन्तुं तन्वन् रजसो भानुमन् विहि ज्योतिष्मतः पथो रक्ष धिया कृतान् ।

अनुल्अणं वयत जोगु वामपो मनुर्भव जनया दैव्यम् जनम् ॥ Rig. 10.53.6॥

“May you spinning the thread of divine knowledge, follow the splendid light of illumination, and protect the pathways well, which have been constructed by sacred acts and divine wisdom; may you render the pious works of the worshiper free from defect; may you first strive to become MAN, and then rise to the status of an enlightened one – the DIVINE.” – Rig Veda 10.53.6

So, to make a new born a human, the child has to undergo yagnopavit (holy thread) samskaar at the age around eight. After this samskaar one is called a dwiija (born again as a human.)

Then he goes to live at a Vedic guru’s ashram to study the Veda and other subjects till the age of 25 while remaining a brahmachaari. While the non-Hindu world talks about Human Rights, the Veda talks about Human Responsibilities. The constitution of Bhaarat needs to be made pro-Vedic and define a human per the Veda.  That way the criminals and demoniacs will not have human rights and can be treated according to what they did.

jaya sri krishna!

From Amit Bhadhuri < >

 The Hindus Must Abandoned Gandhism

 Attack 0n Hinduism & Growing Radicalization of Muslims

Hindus are a punching back. Anybody can smash Hindus, Hinduism, etc.  Why?  Hindus are by nature peaceful. This goodness is taken advantage of by the minorities to bully Hindus, Hinduism, and Modi, BJP RSS VHP and our Hindu traditions and Values etc.

If Hindus fail to defend India the 2nd partition is not far off and the media is helping towards this end especially NDTV, IBN TV18.

From: Dr. M C. Gupta – < >

Saturday, February 14, 2015

I am 73. I retired as a professor of medicine in 2001 and then joined the bar and have been practicing law since then. I live in Delhi. I had seen Mahatma Gandhi once during his prayer meetings.

I have been a great Gandhi follower. Gandhi was a follower of Gita. A true follower of Gita would have remembered that Krishna did not teach non-violence to Arjun. It is OK to be violent when duty demands it. Gandhi would have known that Krishna even asked Arjun to slay Karn when the latter’s chariot got stuck in mud / some obstacle. Killing a soldier when he was incapacitated was adharma. Yet Krishna asked Arjun to attack Karn. So much for Gandhi’s following the Gita.

Vinoba was a follower of Gandhi. He was a great scholar of Sanskrit and wrote treatises on Gita. It would be of interest to know his views about Gandhi. I have not come across the same.

I am tempted to give below a long quote about the Moplah massacre of Hindus and Gandhi’s turning a blind eye to it–

“Gandhi, The Moulana Of Muslim Appeasement

http://www.ivarta.com/columns/OL_070120.htm

By: V Sundaram, IAS, Retd.

January 20, 2007

It is a well-known fact of history that although personally Mahatma Gandhi was a devout Hindu, yet he turned more and more anti-Hindu after 1920 as his public life progressed. The driving passion of his political life was to throw the British out of India. In order to achieve this objective, he was obsessed in his conviction that Hindu – Muslim unity was absolutely necessary and indispensable. There can be two views or more on whether he was right or justified in holding these convictions. However, the irrefutable fact is that again and again he demonstrated his combat readiness to sacrifice or sell out vital Hindu interests, Hindu honor and Hindu blood all the time in deference to the feelings of minorities in general and Muslims in particular. To quote the appropriate words of Prafull Goradia in this context: “For Mahatma Gandhi, no price was too great for appeasing Muslims, so that they did not oppose Hindus. That he did not understand the Muslims was proved by the conduct of the Muslim League and by the vivisection of the country.”

After the Mutiny of 1857, the incidence of Hindu-Muslim riots in India had come down sharply. By lending support to the Khilafat Movement of Ali Brothers in 1920, Mahatma Gandhi inaugurated a new era of a fresh wave of Hindu-Muslim riots. Mahatma Gandhi was a confused man. How could his Satyagraha which was to be effective for attaining our Swaraj could be equally effective for saving the Caliph on his Turkish throne. Gandhi did not understand that restoration of the Caliph would only result in making him again a shining symbol of Pan-Islamism or the Supra-nationalism of Islam as a world religion with its people forming the Ummah. This inherent impending danger was clearly foreseen by Sir Sankaran Nair, a Member of the Viceroy’s Executive Council in 1922. In his book prophetically titled as “Gandhi and Anarchy” published by Tagore and Company, Madras in 1922 he wrote: “It is impossible to believe that Gandhi and his adherents are not aware that this claim of the Mahomedans to be judged only by the Law of the Koran, is a claim which is the fons et origo of all Khilafat claims of whatever kind. It is well to be clear about this, for not only does the acceptance of the claim mean the death knell of the British Empire or Indo-British Commonwealth, whatever name we may care to give to the great fraternity of nations to which we belong, but specifically as regards India it means a real denial of swaraj. For it involves Mahomedan rule and Hindu subjection.”

Thus Sir Sankaran Nair clearly saw the danger signal when Mahatma Gandhi was leading the Muslims of India to convert the Hindus into permanent Serfs. Dr. Manmohan Singh’s recent declaration on Muslim hegemony is only a logical culmination of the process initiated by Mahatma Gandhi and clearly foreseen by Sir Sankaran Nair in 1922.

During the Moplah rebellion in Kerala in 1921, thousands of Hindu men, women and children were killed by the Muslims. Hundreds of women were raped. And yet Gandhi supported the Moplahs and not the Hindu victims of Moplah violence and oppression. In fact Gandhi had no sympathy for the Hindus. Mahatma Gandhi wrote in his “Young India”, “It is wrong to say that Islam has employed force. No religion in this world has spread through the use of force. No Musalman, to my knowledge, has ever approved of compulsion.” Does this not show that Gandhi practiced political deception? According to Gandhi, the Moplah Muslims were guilty of no crime.

But the politically spurious and culturally disastrous view of Mahatma Gandhi on the Moplah rebellion was not shared by Lord Reading, the then Viceroy of India and Sir Sankaran Nair, a member of his Council. Sir Sankaran Nair wrote: “For sheer brutality on women, I do not remember anything in history to match the Malabar rebellion. It broke out on 20 August, 1921. Even by the 6 September, the results were dreadful. There was complete breakdown of Civil Government resulting in widespread disorder, in political chaos, in anarchy and in ruin.

” Let us contrast this with Mahatma Gandhi’s conclusion:

“The Moplahs are among the bravest in the land. They are god-fearing.” How did Gandhi overlook the brutal fact that Moplah Muslims were men-slaughtering, children-strangling and women-raping? I am asking this question in the light of the speech of Lord Reading, viceroy of India, on 20th of August 1921: “A few Europeans and many Hindus have been murdered, communications have been obstructed. Hindu temples sacked, houses of Europeans and Hindus burnt. According to reports Hindus were forcibly converted to Islam… The result has been the temporary collapse of the Civil Government and offices and courts have ceased to function and ordinary business has been brought to a standstill. European and Hindu refugees of all classes are concentrated at Calicut and it is satisfactory to note that they are safe there. One trembles to think of the consequences if the forces of order had not prevailed for the protection of Calicut. Those who are responsible for causing this grave outbreak of violence and crime must be brought to justice and made to suffer the punishment of the guilty.”

Gandhi was a lawyer. He was capable of drawing objective conclusions. No sane mind could have refused to see the brutality of Moplahs. Gandhi had said at that time–A true Hindu should not mind dying at the hands of a Muslim brother. This is not what a lawyer or layman should say.

As regards Godse, the government may not think it prudent to take drastic steps. But the minimum it should do is as follows:

1–It should remove the ban on “Nine hours to Ram” and the film made on this book.

2–It should allow people to write in praise of Godse and to make memorials to him. After all, these are part of free speech.

I end my note by exhorting all to read Godse’s speech in the court in his defense. It is attached herewith.

–M C Gupta,   15-2-2015

————————

WHY ARE WE AFRAID OF NATHU RAM GODSE?

From: Narayanaswamy Subramanian < >

Sunday, February 08, 2015

An excellent collation of genuine sentiments, information, detailed data about National Supreme Patriot Nathuram Vinayak Godse and his opposite — National Traitor Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, who was expelled from his Baniya caste and became a true pariah.

           In New Delhi the existing monuments to Gandhi and to his apostate-atheist disciple Jawarhar Lal Nehru should be destroyed.  They should be replaced by towering monuments to Nathuram Godse and Naranjan Apte, plus to Maharana Pratap, Chhatrapathi Shivaji, Vinayak D Sarvakar, Bhagat Singh and Subhas Chandra Bose. 

          This should happen in every State capital in India, and where Indians have settled abroad in substantial numbers, for example London (United Kingdom), Perth (Australia), San Francisco, New York, Austin (Texas) (United States of America), Pretoria, Cape Town, Bloemfontein, Johannesburg (South Africa), Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia), Singapore.

S Narayanaswamy Iyer

——————–

From: Ganji Shobhan < >

Monday, February 09, 2015

Gandhi is a rascal. Nobody with right mind will praise Gandhi.  One who has some basic common sense will throw this fraudster saint out of the home. One must carefully read this paragraph to understand the Pyscho Gandhi. It is time we call a spade a spade. There is no need to protect this Pyscho Gandhi.

Those were terrible days. Hindu and Sikh refugees from Pakistan were struggling to keep body and soul together. Many of them had lost their loved ones in the partition riots — women were raped in front of their husbands and children; young girls were abducted; men were disemboweled; trains arrived laden with dead bodies; people fleeing marauders were set upon with ferocious brutality. Madanlal Pahwa, a young refugee, Malgonkar writes, “reached a place called Fazilka, in Indian territory, and discovered that another refugee column in which his father and other relatives had set out, had fared much worse. They had been attacked by Muslim mobs: ‘Only 40 or 50 had survived out of 400 or 500…’.” Delhi was flooded by nearly one million refugees, all of them desperately looking for food and shelter. They were distraught and traumatized, unable to figure out why their lives had been turned upside down in so gruesome a manner. Nor could they understand the rationale behind protecting Delhi’s Muslims. What left them aghast was Gandhi’s insistence that Hindu and Sikh refugees should be sent back to Pakistan and Muslims who had left India be brought back. It didn’t make sense. Nor did the vicious blood-letting that followed. Meanwhile, Pakistan had launched its mission to smash and grab Jammu & Kashmir and was demanding that India hand over Rs. 55 crore, its share of the cash reserve inherited from the departing British colonial Government.

——————-

INDIA MUST ABANDONED GANDH-ISM

Posted by: “J. G. Arora” < > Sunday, February 01, 2015

1. The killing of colonels and policemen like Colonel Munindra  Nath Rai and Policeman Sanjeevan Singh by pro-Pakistan elements  in Jammu & Kashmir from time to time are disgraceful tragedies for the nation Such tragedies are very frequent, and are happening due to Gandhian policies followed by successive Indian governments including the present BJP-led government.

2. Since Gandhi-ism means appeasement, self-negation, unconditional surrender and pathway to slavery, such tragedies will continue to happen so long as Mahatma Gandhi remains the role model of the nation. For its very survival as a nation, India must be liberated from Gandhi-ism. Moreover, India must have warriors like Maharana Pratap and Chhatrapati Shivaji as its role-models instead of Mahatma Gandhi who brought India’s worst defeat in history while conceding Muslim League’s demand for the creation of Pakistan for Muslims whereby Bharat lost vital parts of its territory.

Gandhi was publicly doing untouchability, temple entry, khadi and clean toilets and as gullible Hindus came to the streets trotting faithfully behind Gandhi thinking he was leading them to freedom thru clean toilets, khadi and temple entry, Gandhi was undermining Tilak, decimating Ambedkar, evicting Subhash Bose, silencing KM Munshi, Patel and Rajaji, inking deals with Lord Irwin, negotiating with the Cabinet Mission and hobnobbing with Mountbatten behind the scenes, away from public scrutiny.

——————————————

From: Mohan Natarajan < >

Subject: AAP Victory in Delhi

Dear Sir:

Let us all congratulate Kejriwal and his party for this wonderful performance. Kejriwal said that the voting machines are tampered. If you press any button, the vote goes to BJP.  Now what he says, after the victory. Is the AVM’s are not tampered?

The following news throws light on BJP’s performance:

Year       Percentage Of Votes           Seats Won      Votes Polled

2013         33.7                                       36                   2604100

2015         32.14                                      3                     2779810.

BJP managed to get its vote share.  Still it could get only 3 seats because the vote share of the congress, went to AAP.

REASONS FOR BJP’s defeat

——————————————-

CHURCH ATTACKS – NO RELEVANCE

You are wrong about church attacks.  It has no relevance to BJP getting defeated.  By your logic, Modi must have got all the 70 seats, because in the same period 260 temples were vandalized.  Why Hindus have not rallied behind BJP?

Sir, you seem to suggest HEY HINDUS, we can vandalize temples.

If you touch our churches, then the entire minority vote would go to

Opposition.  Be careful. I CAN SAFELY SAY, MINORITIES WILL NEVER VOTE FOR BJP.  WHAT AMBEDKAR SAID – if you convert to Christianity or Islam, you get denationalized.  You cease to be Indians.

You are only Christians or Muslims.  Indian Muslims and Christians are bent upon threatening and subjugating Hindus, in the name of vote bank politics and minority-sm.  This Is Very Bad For Democracy.

Gar Waapsi = You Are Wrong

When Christians and Muslims can convert Hindus, what is wrong with Gar Waapsi.  Our constitution permits free religious activities but not conversion.  So how can you blame Hindus when the minorities commit the original SIN.

The minority controlled and NGO-funded media, by connecting GAR WAPSI with the Delhi results, tries to force Hindus to abandon GAR WAPSI so that Christians and Muslims can continue with the conversion program merrily.

Had Modi brought in the anti-Conversion bill, he would have swept the Delhi polls. Make no mistake about this.

Unhappy Babus You Are Right 

I full agree with your views.  Our babus’ culture is NO WORK, FULL PAY. I congratulate you for your wonderful observation.

Where Modi Erred?

—————————————

Everyone knows, Modi is honest, hard-working, and corruption-free and is the only hope for a brighter India. The Question Arises – What He Has Done For The Last 9 Months For The Common Man.

Jaitely telling that the deficit has been brought down from 4.1250% to

4.0010% has no relevance to anybody.  This figure is not going to satisfy the daily wager, house-wife, rickshaw-puller, auto fellows, laborers, coolies, workers, small traders etc.

Again Modi failed to submit a white paper on the financial position of India, at the time of take-over.  At least, if it had been done, a comparison was possible.

At least Modi could have held a press conference once a month to reach the public.  I promised this but I could not do this for such and such reason.  At least, the public would have been happy that the PM is communicating and is aware of his responsibilities.

Coming to OROP – he could have told the ex-servicemen that I promised OROP but due to the following reasons, there is delay in

Implementation.  I will certainly implement OROP after taking such and such steps.  This tete-e-tete with ex-servicemen, would have made them understand the PM better.

Again, Modi was too soft with Obama. When Obama talked about religious tolerance in India, Modi should have told him point blank mind your business. Don’t interfere in our internal affairs. That would added 15 seats in the Assembly polls because, people would have felt WE HAVE A PM WHO IS TOUGH WHEN IT COMES SAFEGUARING OUR HONOUR. Modi cut a sorry figure before the whole world and Indian masse took him to be weak.

Modi should be very firm when it comes to religious harmony.

He should have introduced anti-conversion bill.  He should have stopped the flow of Christian and Arab funding for conversion. He should tell the minorities you are Indians first and Indians last.  Don’t create problems by conversions etc. Had Modi done this, the whole of India would have applauded him.

Modi gives the impression that he is like a congress C-team when dealing with minorities.  Modi should understand that Muslims and Christians will never vote for him.

In Kashmir, more than 100 temples were destroyed.  Still BJP did not get a single seat in the valley.  Why?  Compare this with the church vandalism in Delhi.  Here also BJP got decimated. Why? That means, BJP gets smashed on both sides. Modi’s survival depends on Hindu consolidation. Not vote bank politics.

The media – both print and electronic is anti-Modi, anti-BJP and anti-India in every issue.  Yesterday, one channel anchor was bordering indecency while feeling ecstatic about BJP’s defeat.  The Government must find out as to why the channels take an anti-BJP stand on every issue – who is funding them – who is behind them.

The channels give the impression that they are operated by Pakistanis.

Anybody who watches Indian channels will get the impression that the Modi government is worse than the ETHIOPIAN GOVERNMENT.

Modi must communicate with the masses – he can mix with ordinary citizens and get on the spot feedback.  He must make the habit of travelling in public transport.  People must say MODI is our man.

If Modi goes, there is no future for India. This is my personal view.

Thanking you,

Yours sincerely

N Mohan

Obama-s Ignorance of Indian History!!

From: R Singh < >

Nonviolence is not an Absolute Principle in the Veda

“Ahimsa Paramo Dharma” is responsible for the unconditional surrender (“Partition”) of India and the ongoing Hindu MASSACRES and the ABDUCTION & RAPE of Hindu girls.

Warfare is not only fighting with weapons. Another important means is to use PSYCHOLOGICAL weapons. These include propaganda to demoralize and confuse the enemy.

This aspect was considered so important that Hitler created a special high powered ministry and placed it under Dr. Goebbels who succeeded in changing the very belief system of the Germans. As a result they saw the dictator as a flawless human being. Such a highly intelligent people like the Germans began to follow him BLINDLY! The same is the case with our Hindu nation. They followed Nehru, and even his offspring, blindly. Many ignorant fools, like the Indians in South America who saw Columbus for the first time, think that Sonia Maino is “Rashtramata”, if not a White goddess!

Most Hindus do not realize that we have many enemies who wish to wipe out Hindus by driving us out of the “Rest” of India (our LANDS).

In our case the enemies have been most successful in the use of this weapon. The most glaring example is the ingrained BELIEF that Muslims are “brothers” of Hindus. Even our top leader, MK Gandhi, a barrister, kept chanting “Hindu Muslim Bhai!” That was ABSURD and STUPID- but even WORSE was to follow.

After Nehru gave away one third of India to the ENEMY the Hindu masses did not seem perturbed over the historic TERRITORIAL loss. Life went on just as before. This NUMBING of senses is due to intensive propaganda, Goebbels style that has DESTROYED the Hindus’ rational and objective thinking power.

In that collective ‘DEGENERATED and DECOMPOSED’ brain any atrocious event and calamity simply fit in easily, without raising an eyebrow.

A glaring example was the easy entry of a FOREIGNER (Sonia Maino) in the Prime Minister’s house as “daughter-in-law” of the whole nation. To question her loyalty to Bharat appeared to the Lok Sabha and all the police chiefs and the army generals totally unnecessary, in fact, bad manners and rude!

In countries where the collective national BRAIN is healthy (not damaged), a foreigner is seen & spotted from a mile and a thousand questions asked about that person’s BACKGROUND, RELIGION, family tree, social connections and affiliations and PROOF of loyalty to the adopted country. None of this happened in our “coolie colony”. People were TAMED by PROPAGANDA.

No wonder NEHRU and his DYNASTY kept a tight control over “Information & Broadcasting”. Radio and Television remained STATE controlled in order to carry on State PROPAGANDA to make the Hindus harmless (“hijdas“)!

One result of this PROPOGANDA is to convince the Hindus that to carry, or use, arms is a sin since among others, Bapu Gandhi insisted on AHIMSA PARMO DHARMA.

His influence (BRAINWASHING) is so successful that it might take many more decades for the Hindu masses to challenge this motto as you have very rightly explained in your e-mail below.

Yet another proof of the collective brain damage, due to PROPAGANDA, is the ingrained FEAR of foreigners. The Hindus do not retaliate or counter attack since it means using force (violence).

Here are some examples of NAKED AGGRESSION against the Hindus taking place day and night:-

1. Hindus are not motivated to catch the “Mohammed” who rapes a girl, and thrash him or castrate him.

2. Hindus “lump” the news on regular basis that it is normal to see a Mohammedan GROOM and a Hindu BRIDE. There is NO stir among the Hindu masses to “gherao” the Jehadi LOAFER and take him to a temple to do his “SHUDDHI” before he sleeps with his Hindu bride. Most Hindus look at the “vanquished” girl through the prism of their own self negation.

3. Hindus are BRAINWASHED to laugh at themselves when they watch Hindi films in which KHANS ridicule our culture and ways of worship. Some of these Khans have taken to bed more than one Hindu wife and produced many children all growing up under the surname “Khan”. The Hindu nation regards the disappearance of our girls as normal. In contrast, no one dares to “touch” a Musalmanee!

4. It is now deeply embedded in Hindu psyche that a Mohammed can destroy or damage a temple but NO Hindu can do the same to any mosque, or INSIST on seeing the miscreants in jail. In “hijda” Hindusthan the police is also USELESS as we see in West Bengal.

5. We saw all the huge international storm of protest over the murder of 2,000 Muslims in Gujarat in 2002 but there is never a whisper over the slaughter of TWO MILLION Hindus in 1947 alone, leave aside the thousands murdered in Noakhali and the Sikhs massacred in Delhi with State involvement. Recall the “Bofors Chor” Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi comparing the fallen Sikhs to the falling leaves in autumn!

Accounts of Hindu massacres “vanish” from Hindu memory in a second- all due to intensive brainwashing by PROPAGANDA. How long did the nation mourn the “death” of Sindh, West Punjab, East Bengal and North Kashmir?

Not even ONE SECOND as we recall TRAITOR Nehru giving his speech about “glow of freedom” when at that very moment there were THOUSNADS OF BURNING PYRES, cremating the Hindus murdered across Pakistan.

Mr Modi will do well to put a competent Minister to look after INFORMATION & BROADCASTING (and EDUCATION) to counter, or reverse, the tide of propaganda being carried out by India’s “COOLIE” PRESS and her despicable lickspittle journalists.

The challenge before the minister will be to end the trait of SELF NEGATION of the Hindus.

Some demeaning, self-negating and humiliating “Scriptures” composed during the ISLAMIC rule also need scrutiny and revision. There is NO parallel of such “self-destruction & humiliation” in either Islam or Christianity!

Finally, it is time to speak of “SHAKTI” instead of one sided unilateral “Shanti”. For a nation kept suppressed and crushed for centuries a ‘THOUGHT & ATTITUDE’ revolution is the need of the hour. The first benefit will be the change in attitude of the BABOOS towards the common citizen. At present the latter is often considered “dust under their feet” as per old colonial style of administration. Then we shall see Zakir Naik and Akbaruddin sealing their lips and Sonia Maino packing for Italy!

Rajput

01/02/15

Obama Perching Tolerance in Hindustan??

Vedics, Please Stop Inter-Vedic Conversion Effortsand Unite Against the Anti-Vedics Instead

Dear Vedic:

Namaste!

I request please give up converting the muurti pujaks to aarya samaajis because:

1. After Adi Shankaracharya (an advaiti and therefore a non-muurti pujak) we have had five Vaishnava Aacharya of which the last was Chaitanya Mahaprabhu.  All of them and their disciples and follower bkahtas do muurti pujaa because: after praaN pratishTha, the muurti becomes an authorized place to submit seva and prayers and do any sadhnaa in its presence, just as a gov’t rules everywhere in its county, but there are authorized post office boxes placed at specific locations. A mail placed in the authorized box will go to its destination, putting mail out of the box will be lost–no one will pick it up to take it to destination.
2. Muurti pujaa process is proven effective over millenniums for advancing spiritually. It is bhakti yoga as descried in Bhagavad Gita by Bhagavaan Krishna.
3. No muurti pujak has interest to convert aarya samaajis or other Vedics; so no need to convert muurti pijaks; no need to preach them by non-bhaktas.
4. No muurti pujaks take away the freedom of thought, speech, action, assembly, property, wives, dignity, land, or honor of any non-muurti pujaks. So, no reason to bother them.
5. Thousands of temples built by the Vedics in the past are religious infrastructure. It is our precious inheritance. Travelling sadhus, aacharyas, sanyaasis, and swamis visit the temples and preach dharma to society.  (The temples on the other hand need to be run under the guidance of a dharma aacharya, not by mere businessmen.  The temple income needs to be used for dharma prachaar and samaj seva.)
6. In Bhaarat/Hindustan three foreign anti-Vedic religions or ideologies have invaded. They are Islam, Christianity, and Communism.  They are aggressively working, with foreign funds, to totally destroy the Vedic culture and dharma.  They are exclusive religions. (In contrast, the vedic dharma is universal religion for mankind.) Therefore, we the Vedics need to stay united and frustrate their efforts. We need to purge out Islam from Bhaarat; we need to make Bhaarat a Vedic State, not “secular,” and that needs unity among the Vedics.

Therefore, unless you are a Muslim, Christian, or a Communist in disguise of an aarya samaaji, please give up slandering muurti pujaa, and do not say that it is idol worship. It is no idol worship.

Let me know any question.

Jai Sri Krishna!

-Skanda987