ॐ Hinduu Nation ॐ

From: tejindersingh kanwar < >   

Subject: Fauj ke woh acchhe din kahaan gaye? 

फ़ौज के वोह् अच्छे दिन कहां गये ?

Some Instances of Kairon’s time and Army actions then

(As sent  by a very senior navy veteran)

Incident 1:

A major’s wife and her sister went to see a movie. As the movie started, two goons came and sat next to them and started misbehaving. They left in disgust and told the major about it. He met the station commander. It was decided that they’ll go and watch the same movie the next day. About five or ten minutes after the movie started, the movie was stopped and the lights came on. The major, accompanied by jawans, came in and picked up the two goons. One of them was the cinema owner and the son of CM — Partap Singh Kairon. He was a very well-known goonda. Outside the hall, these two were bashed up, put in the military ambulance and taken to MH. Panic calls were made to the CM. He rushed from Chandigarh to Amritsar. He, fully escorted by police and press etc., went to see his son in the MH. At the entrance to the cantonment, the caravan was stopped by the sentries who were told that the CM wanted to go to the MH to see his son. The sentries replied that they had orders that ‘this person’ was not to enter the cantonment. The CM had to eat a humble pie and make a statement to the press that what his son did was very wrong and he fully deserved what he received. When this news came out, everyone in the Punjab was very happy. 

Incident 2:

There is another story worth repeating.

The bridge on river Satluj near Phillaur was a narrow one and for big vehicles it was a one way bridge. A military convoy was cleared to enter the bridge from Ladhowal side. When they were nearly half way through, they found a caravan of official cars coming from the other side (from Phillaur ). Both sides met and stopped. A police officer came over and told the convoy commander that the CM (same fellow Kairon) was in a hurry and the convoy had to move back. He was told that it was very difficult for the trucks to reverse all the way. Also, they were cleared first and the cars should not have entered the bridge. The police wala said in a very cocky manner that either they cleared the way or he would arrest the convoy commander. The convoy commander called out his troops and brought them to ‘stand to’. He told the police wala that if the convoy did not move out forthwith he would shoot the whole bloody lot. Needless to say, they obeyed at full speed. I think I was living at Phillaur when the first incident took place. My father was a police officer posted at PTS Phillaur. Fauj ke woh acchhe din kahaan gaye ??

(Under Modi ji, thing will (should) change for better, and change soon. – Skanda987)

SHARIA: THE UNIFYING IDEOLOGY AMONG MODERN TERROR GROUPS

By Brigitte Gabriel

Dear Freedom Lovers of the World,

Rather than the irrational acts of madmen, the beheadings, kidnappings, and terrorist attacks around the world are the end result of a long-developed reading of Islam and what it requires of its followers.

“I highly recommend that by grass root democratic action please declare Islam illegal in kafir democratic countries.  The constitution needs to be amended by the same method because it is defective (it incorrectly assumes all religions are equally good and value human rights.)  Once Islam is declared illegal, it will be very easy and cheap to keep terrorism out of the country.” – Skanda987

From: Rajput < >

Why BJP or the PM seek approval of Muslims in Hindustan?

Neither our daughters nor the cows, nor even our “dharti” are safe if we are seeking the approval of Muslims first!

Please look at the laws in ALL Islamic republics including the two on either side of Bharat.

Saudi Arabia, the size of Kerala State, openly offends the one BILLION Hindus by banning the entry of Gita and Granth in one’s personal luggage. Nor do they allow a tiny “mandir”, church or synagogue in their country, or the sale of pork!

All laws there are in accordance with their ‘holy’ KORAN and in harmony with the aspirations of the MAJORITY community. As in South Kashmir (Article 370 of Nehru’s Constitution), NO Indian can buy even a tiny house in Saudi Arabia!

It is only in our Bharat where the sentiments, feelings and culture of the MAJORITY community can be so easily brushed aside, even trampled under the foot, due to the “consuming disease” called “MUSLIM APPEASEMENT” to the extent of unconditional surrender of one third of (Akhand) Bharat in 1947. We also gave a pledge in cast iron, never to question that bogus FRAUDULANT “Partition” and never to commemorate the two million DEAD Hindus of that year!

Now the Lok Sabha with MAJORITY of Hindu MP’s, is “trembling in fear” whether to ban cow slaughter across Bharat (that is the “Hindu” fragment of Akhand Bharat)..

It is time now to ASSERT the “HINDU WAY OF LIFE” (which is tolerance and compassion for all living beings). Cow is the NATIONAL symbol of Bharat associated with our ancient traditions that were prevalent thousands of years BEFORE Mohammed was born in Arabia.

Appeasement is the first step towards “accommodation”, i.e., tolerating the INTOLERANT, that leads to surrender. Now let us be serious about our survival!

After the cows it is the temple in AYODYA. Seeing the ruins there our Maimoona Begum, a convert to Islam, felt encouraged to “go” for AMRITSAR in 1984. The political “Witch” would not have dared had the Grand Temple in Ayodhya been up and functioning!

The lesson is: “There should be NO chink in Hindu ARMOUR. And NEVER again will we accept a Prime Minister as well as the Supreme Commander of Hindusthan who is neither a Hindu nor for Akhand Bharat.”

Mr. Modi’s government ought to be seen as virile and manly. They are expected to do four things immediately;

1. Ban cow slaughter. (Defense and protection of Cows).

2. Ban conversion of Hindu girls (“devis”) on marrying a Muslim. It also amounts to their “slaughter”! The groom should embrace the religion of his bride. (Defense of Bharat’s Daughters).

3. Construction of Grand historic Temple in Ayodhya; (National pride and honor); and

4. Repeal of Article 370 that bestows special powers only to the J & K State as if the others were “niggers”! (One law for all).

Rajput

From: Mohan Natarajan < >

To: All the anti-Vedic Media and TOI

Dear Sir:

            YOU (still) CONTINUE YOUR ANTI-RSS, ANTI-BJP AND ANTI-HINDU STANCE

—

I am surprised, you are making a mountain out of a mole hill.  Bhagvat said that Teresa did social service with an eye on conversion.  CAN YOU OR CHRISTIANS SAY HONESTLY THAT THEY ARE DOING SOCIAL SERVICE WITHOUT DOING CONVERSION?

Rev. Couto himself has not said in the interview THAT CHRISTIANS ARE NOT DOING CONVERSION.  How Peter Wagner, the Christian expert can say that the present Christian population is around 25%.  The real figure is NOT REVEALED because the converts retain their Hindu names to enjoy the benefit of reservation.

Your paper must conduct a similar interview with Bhagvat to know his side of the story.  WILL YOU DO IT?

See how the media hates Modi and Hindus.  The Christian and Muslim NGOs prostrated before US to deny visa to Modi. The same media made fun of Modi’s suit – 10 lacs, 10 lacs.  The same media made fun of Modi’s 56 inches chest. But the same media is very reverential towards Mother, without telling the other side of the story. You can publish extracts from Hitches book so that Rev. Couto may know the true picture.

See Modi’s magnanimity:

He invited Obama twice.  He broke protocol to receive and see off BARRACK HUSSAIN OBAMA.  How Obama responded? He BACKSTABBED AND FRON-STABBED MODI.

For a change, I am appending a posting from another group – a post that is refreshing to Modi followers/lovers:

Q UOTE

Two events happened to me recently about which I want to share my experiences. My dad passed away about 5 months ago at the ripe old age of 94.  He had retired in 1975 as Supdt. Engr in CPWD in Delhi and was getting the central gov’t pension from 1975 to 2014 (about 40,000/-per month). In the year 2010 he wrote to the ministry of pensions asking to include my mother’s name Sharadha, now 89 yrs, as the family pensioner

In the year 2012, due to his failing eyesight I reminded them by email as well as by phone to Delhi. I was told they are processing it and will send the revised papers “soon”.2014 came and my dad had still not rec’d confirmation of my mom’s name as family pensioner. He passed away assuming his wife will not be the recipient of around 25,000/-PM as her pension.

When I went to the bank after my dad’s death with all papers they said what I was expecting them to say that my mom’s name was not in the pension payment order. Frustrated, I sent a copy of the earlier correspondence of 2010 to the pension ministry.

Within 4 days I got an email from some clerk saying the papers will be ready within a week (not a vague “soon.”) On the 5th day I got a phone call from a person who introduced himself as Dr. Jitendra Singh, and he said the papers with my mom’s details have been sent to the bank that very day.

I hung up thanking him. When I checked their web site Dr. Jitendra Singh was the minister of state for pensions and personnel grievances, reporting to the cabinet minister who was Modi himself. When I called back to thank the  minister himself again, he modestly said it was the PM’s directive that no woman who has lost her husband recently should be further traumatized by delayed paperwork on pensions.

(What Manmohan did not do in 4 years, Modi did in 4 days.)

And last month when my mom had to give her life certificate to the bank a bank officer came home to get her signature due to her old age. (Last year I took my 93 years old dad to the bank with great difficulty).  The bank also confirmed it was Finance ministry directive to treat Sr. Citizens with extra sensitivity!!

UNQUOTE

WHEN TOI IS GOING TO BE IMPARTIAL?  

(Skanda’s answer:

When TOI’s owner/controller is pro-Vedic and pro-raashtra; or when the Vedics stop buying/supporting TOI.)

THAT IS A MILLION DOLLAR QUESTION.

Thanking you,

Yours sincerely

N Mohan

 IndiaStar: A Literary-Art magazine

Mother Teresa’s Hidden Mission in India:

Conversion to Christianity

By Dhiru Shah

[Editor’s intro: Dhiru Shah is an Atlanta-based writer.]

We must praise and respect any person involved in selfless humanitarian work irrespective of his or her religious belief. But as soon as that work is done with ulterior motive, it no longer remains a saintly deed. Mother Teresa’s work falls into the second category. Unfortunately, glowing tributes were paid to her by the pseudo-secularist leaders of India, Indian newspapers, and several Westernized Indians, without examining her mission in India.

Mother Teresa was wedded to the Catholic Church, particularly the Vatican establishment, whose main mission is to convert people in developing countries into Christianity by any means, now that Europeans are abandoning church membership and Christianity in increasing numbers. (But for imported Indian priests and nuns many European churches would have to close doors because Europeans seminaries are unable to fill their vacancies with Europeans.) In the early days of Christianity, those who refused to believe in Jesus were first branded as heretics and witches and then killed or burnt at the stake. In the name of the holy wars, military missions were sent which resulted in millions of people being massacred in South America. To perpetuate the forces of imperialism in Asia and Africa, the Western powers fit like a hand in glove with the

===========================

Gandhi: “If I had the power and could legislate, I should certainly stop all proselytising.” (Collected Works, Vol 61, page 46-47)

============================

Christian Church and used their military might to convert the natives into Christianity. Following the dictum ‘the end justifies the means,’ the Christian Church had to devise new means to convert Asians and Africans into Christianity after the demise of the Western Imperialism. Along with this came a breed of Christian evangelists guided and financed by the Vatican and the Western powers to carry on the crusade by using the label of “poverty and disease” as their weapons. That is exactly what Mother Teresa was doing in India.

Mother Teresa portrayed India as a poor, starving, and a diseased land to her Western donors who responded by filling her coffers so that she could continue her mission of converting the poor and illiterate of India. She effectively used the converted Indian nuns for this purpose and thereby achieved her major mission of the Church. Mother Teresa, the founder of the “Missionaries of Charity “was “a crafty user of public relations” as pointed out by Christopher Hitchens in his recent book, The Missionary Position: Mother Teresa in Theory and Practice.

The Western media played a big role in projecting her as a saint and savior of the poor. This powerful media at the same time told the world that Indians, particularly the Hindus, don’t care for their helpless people and hence a foreign Christian saint has to perform that job.

The Christian Church and the Western media succeeded in convincing many of the Indian leaders and the westernized Indians that Mother Teresa was a great saint and therefore should be given a state funeral, an honor reserved only for great leaders of India. She was equated by one of the Indian leaders with Mahatma Gandhi. In doing so, then Indian Prime Minister, Mr. Gujaral, and leaders of other political parties excepting the BJP confirmed to the world that the Indians are incapable of taking care of their own poor and sick people. Indian leaders like Gujaral have insulted Gandhi by equating Mother Teresa with him.

Gandhi was extremely articulate in opposing the conversion activities of Christian missionaries in India and questioned their motives in establishing educational institutions and other services in India. The following are cited from Arun Shourie’s 302-page book, Missionaries in India New Delhi, ASA Publications, 1994):

“There was a deeper problem with these services, and Gandhiji drew attention to it again and again. The services were incidental. They were the means. The objective was to convert the natives to Christianity. “The Collected Works of Gandhi” contain several accounts as do Mahadev Desai’s “Diaries” in which missionaries acknowledged to Gandhiji that the institutions and services are incidental that the aim is to gather a fuller harvest of converts for the Church.

“To gain access to non-Christian households, counsels the ‘Catholic Dharma ka Pracharak,’ [How to Preach the Catholic Religion] the preacher should know something of medicine. He will then be sought after whenever there is some illness in the house. Once there, he should try to prevail upon the parents that he should be allowed to baptize the child as the baptism would aid the child’s recovery. If they do not agree, says the guide: ‘If it is clear to you that the father is not going to agree to the child being baptized, and, as far as you can see, the child is close to death, then, on the pretext of administering some medicine, sprinkle water on his head in some secret way and pronounce the words of baptism. O, preacher, should the child die, you would have opened the gates of heaven for this child. Is this not a good deed? Now, if every preacher were to devote himself to his work, then how many children would they send to heaven in a year?’ “(Shourie, page 7-8)

Shourie goes on to question the motives of Mother Teresa.

Just how strongly Gandhi felt about Christian missionaries in India can be gauged from his recorded comments:

1. Gandhi’s writing: “The cultured Hindu society has admitted its grievous sin against the untouchables. But the effect of Christianity upon India in general…has been disastrous.” (Shourie, p.6)
2. Gandhi to Krezenski, a visiting professor of Philosophy from Poland, who had told him that Catholicism was the only true religion: “The idea of conversion, I assure you is the deadliest poison that ever sapped the fountain of truth.” (Shourie, p.11)
3. Gandhi to a visiting missionary nurse: “The other day a missionary descended on a famine area with money in his pocket, distributed it among the famine-stricken, converted them to his fold, took charge of their temple and demolished it. This is outrageous. This friend goes and gets it demolished at the hands of the very men who only a little while ago believed that God was there.” (Shourie, p. 17)
4. Gandhiji: “If I had the power and could legislate, I should certainly stop all proselytizing.” (Collected Works, Vol 61, page 46-47; Shourie, p. 38).
5. Several missionaries tried to convert Gandhi. When they failed, one of the reverend gentlemen, writes Mahadev Desai, “retired with the imprecation…’Mr. Gandhi, soon there will come a day when you will be judged, not in your righteousness, but in the righteousness of Jesus.’ “(Collected Works, Vol 60, p.323; Shourie, p. 240)

Gandhi worked for the poor and the diseased without any selfish motive. He was a great philosopher, teacher, intellectual, and above all a great world leader. None of this can be said of Mother Teresa. Her helping of poor and downtrodden was only a facade behind which she carried out her real assigned mission of converting the miserable lot. Hitchens calls her as a “Christian Fundamentalist” who described the suffering of the poor as a gift from God. She called abortion as the single greatest threat to the world peace in her Nobel Prize speech. She was against attempts to resist injustice and inequality and though she called herself as “non-political,” she expressed sympathy for conservative Catholic forces in Latin America and Southern Europe.

Was Mother Teresa truly a holy, selfless person and completely dedicated to the service of the poor and the wretched as she has been projected by her mission and the world press? No, says Hitchens. She befriended the rich and powerful and was a defender of Western big business. Though she proclaimed her devotion to the poor and downtrodden, she urged the Indians to forgive Union Carbide for the gas leak in Bhopal which had killed more than 2000 people. She visited Haiti in 1981 to accept that nation’s highest award from the Duvalier family and made a glowing speech in which she said that the dictator ‘Baby Doc’ and his wife, Michele, not only loved the poor but were also loved by the poor!

Hitchens further reveals that Mother Teresa went to Albania in 1990, at that time the most oppressive of the Balkan Stalinist states, and laid a wreath on the grave of the dictator, Enver Hoxha, and embraced Hoxha’s widow while remaining silent on human rights. In 1992, Mother Teresa gave many lucrative endorsements, including a character reference to the court for Charles Keating, the biggest fraud and embezzler in the American history who stole a total $252 million from mainly small and poor depositors. Hitchens claims that Keating gave $1.25 million in cash to Mother Teresa and allowed her to use his private jet. The court had asked her to return the donation given by Keating but she never replied to the request.

Hitchens describes how Mother Teresa urged the faithful in the Republic of Ireland to vote against the referendum on the divorce issue but when asked in an interview in “The Ladies Home Journal” about Princess Diana’s impending divorce, she said, “It is good thing that it is over. Nobody was happy anyhow.” Thus she preached morality and obedience to the poor but forgiveness and indulgence for the princesses.

Hitchens doubts her celebrated concern for the poor and the weak. Hitchens cites testimony from the leading American and British physicians about the extremely low standard of medicine practiced in her small Calcutta clinics. There are no pain killers and the syringes are washed in cold water. He goes on to claim that no public accounts are made available for her Missionaries of Charity, but enormous sums are known to have been raised.

Mother Teresa had spoken with pride of having opened more than 500 convents in 125 countries, “not counting India.” It is obvious that the money donated by well-wishers (or guilty-conscience Westerners?) for the relief of poor was being used for the purpose of religious proselytizing by the “Missionary Multinational.”

India still remains poor after 50 years of independence. This does not speak highly of the Congress party. The only objective of Congress politicians has been to remain in power. Most Congress leaders have been naive and shallow who have never bothered to read and analyze the Christian and Islamic histories and understand their present and future strategies of conversion of poor and helpless people of India.

India has already been divided into three countries thanks to the pseudo-secularism of Nehru and his dynasty. The Congress under Sonia Gandhi and their leftist supporters want the government to follow the same policies which will eventually divide India further. The current problems in Kashmir, Nagaland, and Assam are the results of the failure on the part of the Indian leaders to recognize the threat of the Christian and Islamic conversion factor. In any country, such leaders would have been branded as traitors for selling their country to foreigners.

Unfortunately, many westernized Indians in India and abroad have shown the same ignorance, indifference, and insensitivity on the above subject as their leaders. Their minds are so Anglo-Americanized that they read and believe only in the Western media which always wants to propagate the Western religion, culture, and history in the developing world. Most of the leading Indian newspapers and magazines have also followed this trend. They have joined hands since independence with the Indian politicians in criticizing the Hindus and ignoring the real danger of the Christian and Islamic conversion jihad which is being carried out currently in India, supported and financed by the Vatican Establishment, Western powers, and Islamic countries. Millions of dollars are pouring into India every day from these sources to convert and subvert India.

By glorifying Mother Teresa, the world has been made to believe that there are no other persons in India, excepting her who are engaged in caring for the poor and helpless folks. This is a lie perpetuated by the Christian church and the Western media slavishly supported by some section of the Indian press and the dishonest politicians.

There are many Indians involved in similar noble humanitarian works like Mother Teresa but without her ulterior motives. Pandurang Shashtri Athavale had dedicated himself in selfless ‘Lok Seva’ for many years. He and his followers have made a tremendous impact on the lives of poor and helpless fishermen on the West Coast of India. Until he won the Templeton Award, he was not recognized by the Anglo-Americanized Indians or the Indian government.

Acharya Shri Chandananji, a Jain nun, has been carrying on a crusade of uplifting the illiterate and poor section of the society in Bihar since 1973. She founded an institution called “Veeraytan” at Rajgir, Bihar with the clear objective of ‘providing unflinching service in the field of community health, education, and employment’ which has created a total social transformation of that locality. It teaches ‘the practicality of religion to the modern scientific world, a religion totally honest to mankind and entirely free from the sectarian prejudices.’ The institution has set up a hundred bed charitable eye hospital along with other medical facilities which is basically managed by the nuns supported by a medical team of surgeons, doctors, nurses, and medical students. Veerayatan is also involved in uplifting the lives of thousands of deprived local children by providing free meals and education. It also provides training facilities in vocational courses like carpentry, pottery, and medical staff attendants. Acharya Shri Chandanaji has been able to prove in spite of several problems and challenges that it is possible to serve the poor and needy without any sectarian bias.

The list of such dedicated humanitarians is inexhaustible. In every nook and corner of India one can find such workers who devote their lives to the caring and service of the poor and weak sections of the society. Some of them are so humble that they don’t want their names to be brought into limelight. Unfortunately, westernized Indians have the tendency to recognize our great people only when there is a stamp of approval of the Western world. We did not give the state funerals to such great humanitarians like Vinoba Bhave or Jayprakash Narain, but our leaders thought it fit to give that rare honor to Mother Teresa in order to please the Western powers, the Vatican, and the minority at home.

Instead of creating a true secular state where all citizens are governed by the same laws and wherein all people irrespective of their faith are treated equally, our self-serving politicians in India have not only enacted separate laws for minorities but also have given special preferential treatment to them, solely for the purpose of getting their votes. Any person from the majority community objecting to this type of pseudo-secularism is branded as a “Hindu Chauvinist” or “Hindu Fundamentalist.”

It is unfortunate that neither the Indian leaders nor the educated people from the majority community have learnt any lessons from the last 800 years of India’s bloody slavery. Today India is being subverted from within as well as abroad by the Christian and Islamic forces who are bent on disintegrating India with the active help of some greedy and selfish politicians and the indifferent majority. Those who do not heed the truth of history must perish.

===================================================

Dhiru Shah

From: Harish Sharma < >

Why can’t Indian Americans be more Indian?

By Francois Gautier Source : SIFY

(Skanda987’s answer: Dharma glaani; not knowing the Vedic dharma as it is, and not living per the dharma. However, I think that all the Indian Americans are not as this article describes.)

It’s lunchtime at the home of the Consul General of India in New York, Dnyaneshwar M. Mulay.

A young Hindu American arrives. Her name is Suchitra Vijayan and she teaches part time in Columbia University, one of the most prestigious in the USA & plans to start there a course on South Asian Human Rights.

She says that she is first going to travel to India to interview Kashmiri Muslims and Christian Nagas – obviously an anti-Indian agenda – while her Indian consular mentor smiles proudly…

Welcome to America, the home of millions of Indians, some of whom make a living out of bashing India in American universities and in US publications.

Let’s face it: Indians who immigrate to America most of the time merge totally into the American way of life and their children never come back to their homeland.

The culprit, of course, is Indian education that mass produces brilliant Indians, who are only good for export, because students are not taught to be proud of their own culture, the way French are proud to be French or the Americans proud to be Americans.

As a result, Indian Americans know nothing about Kalidasa, probably one of the greatest poets ever, or Shivaji Maharaj, who is on par with Napoleon, or Sri Aurobindo, India’s greatest contemporary philosopher- but all about Shakespeare, the latest Dan Brown novel, or the best Italian restaurant in New York.

This is the greatest brain drain in the world, which allowed the Silicon Valley to flourish (80% Indian engineers), or the American medical system to expand (60% Indians).

Compare this to the American Chinese: Not only do they unabashedly stand out as Chinese, but they repatriate many of their funds to China and even go back to the mainland, to be part of the great Chinese economic boom.

American Indians rave about the American way of life, but it burns out a human being in 30 or 40 years. They start early for work – by 7 am, America’s millions of highways are already clogged with traffic.

There is fierce competitiveness in the work place – you can be fired in a minute for no reason. Imagine the late hours and heartburn produced over the years by food too quickly swallowed on the run or in the car, the immense stress at airports where security – thanks to continuing terrorism – has reached inhuman proportions…

If only American Indians did retain a bit of their Indian-ness…

Today’s Hollywood stars all do yoga, India’s gift to the world. Yet not only it is not taught in Indian schools and universities as it should, but our Hindu Americans do not practice it.

What else? Pranayama is the ancient Indian science of breathing. Through it you can not only gain more energy, but also de-stress naturally and balance your mind.

It is also a perfectly secular science: Respiration has no religion and a Muslim, a Hindu or a Christian breathe the same air.

In fact, Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, who has revived and modernized pranayama, has many Muslims and Christians teachers and disciples. Yet, neither is it taught in India, nor do our Indian Americans seem to practice it much.

What about meditation, this most ancient technique that has again no religion, and can be practiced by anybody, with wonderful effects on the mind and the body?

In fact, American companies have begun introducing meditation in their seminars and it is becoming mainstream in the US. Does that mean that meditation is taught in Indian schools, as it should be, or that our Indian Americans practice it? Not at all.

What about Ayurveda, the oldest medical science still in practice that understood 3000 years before western medicine, that many diseases have a psychosomatic origin? Do our Hindu Americans use Ayurveda? Unlikely.

Yet, what would happen if Indian Americans practiced a little bit of that Indian-ness? They would shine, be an example to their fellow Americans, and make India proud.

Instead they want to become more American than the Americans. In this process, they drop their unique identity and are a loss not only to India, but also to America, as they bring nothing new to American culture.

And because they do not stand out, they allow these multiple South Asian groups that sprout everywhere, to be dominated by hostile Indian Americans, who, for instance, convinced the US Government for ten years to deny Narendra Modi a visa.

At the same time, it is true that America, whatever its faults, has always stood up for freedom and democracy. It did so during World War II, when it saved Europe from Nazi domination. It is doing so today, by being the only country in the world willing to take on terrorism head on.

Americans are friendly, hardworking, and it should soon dawn upon them that India is their natural political ally, in an Asia confronted with terrorism born out of Pakistan, Afghanistan or Indonesia. It is also the obvious democratic, pro-western and liberal economic destination to counterbalance China’s aggressive hegemony in Asia.

Meanwhile, it is very unfortunate that the second highest Indian official in the USA, endorses and promotes anti-Indian agendas, whereas he should be the first one to hunt them out. This Nehruvian mind-set in diplomats has got to stop.

The author is the editor in chief of the Paris based La Revue de l ’Inde.

From: Narain Kataria < >

CHINA  GOVERNMENT  FORCES IMAMS  TO DANCE IN THE STREET IN XIANJANG

http://www.moroccoworldnews.com/2015/02/151682/imams-forced-dance-street-religiously-repressed-xianjang/

By Kristina Fried

In order to curb the diabolical activities of radical Islamists  who have brutally and mercilessly  murdered hundreds of  innocent Chinese in the name of Allah, Chinese Government  made  imams to dance and swear on oath that they would not teach religion [Islam]  to children …..  Teachers in the district were forced to take a similar oath, also swearing to teach their students to stay away from mosques.

(The Muslims in kafir countries need also to be forced to not force Islam on their children and their women. -Skanda987)

 Hundreds of Indian Muslims have been radicalized by social media and recruited by IS (Islamic State).  However, it is a matter of great regret and concern  that so far Government of India has not yet formulated a clear cut and solid strategy to nip in bud the traitorous  designs  of  Jihadists  whose sole aim is to destabilize, balkanize and consequently Islamize India. 

Narain Kataria