“मैंने गांधी को क्यों मारा” – नथ्थुराम गोड़से

From: Pramod Agrawal < > wrote:

“मैंने गांधी को क्यों मारा” – नथ्थुराम गोड़से

 

60 साल तक भारत में प्रतिबंधित रहा नथ्थुराम का अंतिम भाषण “मैंने गांधी को क्यों मारा” ।

अपने मित्रों को बतायें अपने मित्रों को बतायें अपने मित्रों को बतायें ।

30 जनवरी 1948 को नथ्थुराम गोड़से ने महात्मा गांधी की गोली मारकर हत्या कर दी थी लेकिन नथ्थुराम गोड़से घटना स्थल से फरार नही हुआ बल्कि उसने आत्मसमर्पण कर दिया | नथ्थुराम गोड़से समेत 17 अभियुक्तों पर गांधी जी की हत्या का मुकदमा चलाया गया | इस मुकदमे की सुनवाई के दरम्यान न्यायमूर्ति खोसला से नथ्थुराम ने अपना वक्तव्य स्वयं पढ़ कर जनता को सुनाने की अनुमति माँगी थी जिसे न्यायमूर्ति ने स्वीकार कर लिया था | हालाँकि सरकार ने नथ्थुराम के इस वक्तव्य पर प्रतिबन्ध लगा दिया था लेकिन नथ्थुराम के छोटे भाई और गांधी जी की हत्या के सह-अभियोगी गोपाल गोड़से ने 60 साल की लम्बी कानूनी लड़ाई लड़ने के बाद सुप्रीम कोर्ट में विजय प्राप्त की और नथ्थुराम का वक्तव्य प्रकाशित किया गया | नथ्थुराम गोड़से ने गांधी हत्या के पक्ष में अपनी 150 दलीलें न्यायलय के समक्ष प्रस्तुति की | देसी लुटियंस पेश करते है “नथ्थुराम गोड़से के वक्तव्य के मुख्य अंश” :

  1. नथ्थुराम का विचार था कि गांधी जी की अहिंसा हिन्दुओं को कायर बना देगी |कानपुर में गणेश शंकर विद्यार्थी को मुसलमानों ने निर्दयता से मार दिया था महात्मा गांधी सभी हिन्दुओं से गणेश शंकर विद्यार्थी की तरह अहिंसा के मार्ग पर चलकर बलिदान करने की बात करते थे | नथ्थुराम गोड़से को भय था गांधी जी की ये अहिंसा वाली नीति हिन्दुओं को कमजोर बना देगी और वो अपना अधिकार कभी प्राप्त नहीं कर पायेंगे |

 

  1. साल 1919 को अमृतसर के जलियाँवाला बाग़ गोलीकांड के बाद से पुरे देश में ब्रिटिश हुकुमत के खिलाफ आक्रोश उफ़ान पे था | भारतीय जनता इस नरसंहार के खलनायक जनरल डायर पर अभियोग चलाने की मंशा लेकर गांधी जी के पास गयी लेकिन गांधी जी ने भारतवासियों के इस आग्रह को समर्थन देने से साफ़ मना कर दिया।

 

  1. महात्मा गांधी ने खिलाफ़त आन्दोलन का समर्थन करके भारतीय राजनीति में साम्प्रदायिकता का जहर घोल दिया | महात्मा गांधी खुद को मुसलमानों का हितैषी की तरह पेश करते थे वो केरल के मोपला मुसलमानों द्वारा वहाँ के 1500 हिन्दूओं को मारने और 2000 से अधिक हिन्दुओं को मुसलमान बनाये जाने की घटना का विरोध तक नहीं कर सके |
  2. कांग्रेस के त्रिपुरा अधिवेशन में नेताजी सुभाष चन्द्र बोस को बहुमत से काँग्रेस अध्यक्ष चुन लिया गया किन्तु गांधी जी ने अपने प्रिय सीतारमय्या का समर्थन कर रहे थे | गांधी जी ने सुभाष चन्द्र बोस से जोर जबरदस्ती करके इस्तीफ़ा देने के लिए मजबूर कर दिया |

 

  1. 23 मार्च 1931 को भगत सिंह, सुखदेव और राजगुरु को फांसी दे दी गयी | पूरा देश इन वीर बालकों की फांसी को टालने के लिए महात्मा गांधी से प्रार्थना कर रहा था लेकिन गांधी जी ने भगत सिंह की हिंसा को अनुचित ठहराते हुए देशवासियों की इस उचित माँग को अस्वीकार कर दिया।

 

  1. गांधी जी कश्मीर के हिन्दू राजा हरि सिंह से कहा कि कश्मीर मुस्लिम बहुल क्षेत्र है अत: वहां का शासक कोई मुसलमान होना चाहिए | अतएव राजा हरिसिंह को शासन छोड़ कर काशी जाकर प्रायश्चित करने | जबकि हैदराबाद के निज़ाम के शासन का गांधी जी ने समर्थन किया था जबकि हैदराबाद हिन्दू बहुल क्षेत्र था | गांधी जी की नीतियाँ धर्म के साथ, बदलती रहती थी | उनकी मृत्यु के पश्चात सरदार पटेल ने सशक्त बलों के सहयोग से हैदराबाद को भारत में मिलाने का कार्य किया | गांधी जी के रहते ऐसा करना संभव नहीं होता |
  2. पाकिस्तान में हो रहे भीषण रक्तपात से किसी तरह से अपनी जान बचाकर भारत आने वाले विस्थापित हिन्दुओं ने दिल्ली की खाली मस्जिदों में जब अस्थाई शरण ली | मुसलमानों ने मस्जिद में रहने वाले हिन्दुओं का विरोध किया जिसके आगे गांधी नतमस्तक हो गये और गांधी ने उन विस्थापित हिन्दुओं को जिनमें वृद्ध, स्त्रियाँ व बालक अधिक थे मस्जिदों से खदेड़ बाहर ठिठुरते शीत में रात बिताने पर मजबूर किया गया।

 

  1. महात्मा गांधी ने दिल्ली स्थित मंदिर में अपनी प्रार्थना सभा के दौरान नमाज पढ़ी जिसका मंदिर के पुजारी से लेकर तमाम हिन्दुओं ने विरोध किया लेकिन गांधी जी ने इस विरोध को दरकिनार कर दिया | लेकिन महात्मा गांधी एक बार भी किसी मस्जिद में जाकर गीता का पाठ नहीं कर सके |

 

  1. लाहौर कांग्रेस में वल्लभभाई पटेल का बहुमत से विजय प्राप्त हुयी किन्तु गान्धी अपनी जिद के कारण यह पद जवाहरलाल नेहरु को दिया गया | गांधी जी अपनी मांग को मनवाने के लिए अनशन-धरना-रूठना किसी से बात न करने जैसी युक्तियों को अपनाकर अपना काम निकलवाने में माहिर थे | इसके लिए वो नीति-अनीति का लेशमात्र विचार भी नहीं करते थे |

 

  1. 14 जून 1947 को दिल्ली में आयोजित अखिल भारतीय कांग्रेस समिति की बैठक में भारत विभाजन का प्रस्ताव अस्वीकृत होने वाला था, लेकिन गांधी जी ने वहाँ पहुँच कर प्रस्ताव का समर्थन करवाया। यह भी तब जबकि गांधी जी ने स्वयं ही यह कहा था कि देश का विभाजन उनकी लाश पर होगा। न सिर्फ देश का विभाजन हुआ बल्कि लाखों निर्दोष लोगों का कत्लेआम भी हुआ लेकिन गांधी जी ने कुछ नहीं किया |

 

  1. धर्म-निरपेक्षता के नाम पर मुस्लिम तुष्टीकरण की नीति के जन्मदाता महात्मा गाँधी ही थे | जब मुसलमानों ने हिंदी को राष्ट्रभाषा बनाये जाने का विरोध किया तो महात्मा गांधी ने सहर्ष ही इसे स्वीकार कर लिया और हिंदी की जगह हिन्दुस्तानी (हिंदी + उर्दू की खिचड़ी) को बढ़ावा देने लगे | बादशाह राम और बेगम सीता जैसे शब्दों का चलन शुरू हुआ |

 

  1. कुछ एक मुसलमान द्वारा वंदेमातरम् गाने का विरोध करने पर महात्मा गांधी झुक गये और इस पावन गीत को भारत का राष्ट्र गान नहीं बनने दिया |13. गांधी जी ने अनेक अवसरों पर शिवाजी, महाराणा प्रताप व गुरू गोबिन्द सिंह को पथभ्रष्ट देशभक्त कहा। वही दूसरी ओर गांधी जी मोहम्मद अली जिन्ना को क़ायदे-आजम कहकर पुकारते थे |

 

  1. कांग्रेस ने 1931 में स्वतंत्र भारत के राष्ट्र ध्वज बनाने के लिए एक समिति का गठन किया था इस समिति ने सर्वसम्मति से चरखा अंकित भगवा वस्त्र को भारत का राष्ट्र ध्वज के डिजाइन को मान्यता दी किन्तु गांधी जी की जिद के कारण उसे तिरंगा कर दिया गया।

 

  1. जब सरदार वल्लभ भाई पटेल के नेतृत्व में सोमनाथ मन्दिर का सरकारी व्यय पर पुनर्निर्माण का प्रस्ताव पारित किया गया तब गांधी जी जो कि मन्त्रीमण्डल के सदस्य भी नहीं थे ने सोमनाथ मन्दिर पर सरकारी व्यय के प्रस्ताव को निरस्त करवाया और 13 जनवरी 1948 को आमरण अनशन के माध्यम से सरकार पर दिल्ली की मस्जिदों का सरकारी खर्चे से पुनर्निर्माण कराने के लिए दबाव डाला।

 

  1. भारत को स्वतंत्रता के बाद पाकिस्तान को एक समझौते के तहत 75 करोड़ रूपये देने थे भारत ने 20 करोड़ रूपये दे भी दिए थे लेकिन इसी बीच 22 अक्टूबर 1947 को पाकिस्तान ने कश्मीर पर आक्रमण कर दिया | केन्द्रीय मन्त्रिमण्डल ने आक्रमण से क्षुब्ध होकर 55 करोड़ की राशि न देने का निर्णय लिया | जिसका महात्मा गांधी ने विरोध किया और आमरण अनशन शुरू कर दिया जिसके परिणामस्वरूप 55 करोड़ की राशि भारत ने पाकिस्तान दे दी ।

महात्मा गांधी भारत के नहीं अपितु पाकिस्तान के राष्ट्रपिता थे जो हर कदम पर पाकिस्तान के पक्ष में खड़े रहे, फिर चाहे पाकिस्तान की मांग जायज हो या नाजायज | गांधी जी ने कदाचित इसकी परवाह नहीं की |

किसी को देश के टुकड़े करने के ,एक समप्रदाय के साथ पक्षपात करने की अनुमति नहीं दे सकता हूँ | गांधी जी की हत्या के सिवा मेरे पास कोई दूसरा उपाय नहीं था |

 

नथ्थुराम गोड़से जी द्वारा अदालत में दिए बयान के मुख्य अंश…..

मेने गांधी को नहीं मारा , मेने गांधी का वध किया हे |

गांधी वध |

वो मेरे दुश्मन नहीं थे परन्तु उनके निर्णय राष्ट्र के लिए घातक साबित हो रहे थे |

जब व्यक्ति के पास कोई रास्ता न बचे तब वह मज़बूरी में सही कार्य के लिए गलत रास्ता अपनाता हे |

मुस्लिम लीग और पाकिस्तान निर्माण की गलत निति के प्रति गांधीजी की सकारात्मक प्रतिक्रिया ने ही मुझे मजबूर किया |

पाकिस्तान को 55 करोड़ का भुकतान करने की गैरवाजिब मांग को लेकर गांधी जी अनशन पर बेठे |

बटवारे में पाकिस्तान से आ रहे हिन्दुओ की आपबीती और दूरदशा ने मुझे हिला के रख दिया था |

अखंड हिन्दू राष्ट्र गांधी जी के कारण मुस्लिम लीग के आगे घुटने टेक रहा था |

बेटो के सामने माँ का खंडित होकर टुकड़ो में बटना |

विभाजित होना असहनीय था |

अपनी ही धरती पर हम परदेशी बन गए थे |

मुस्लिम लीग की सारी गलत मांगो को गांधी जी मानते जा रहे थे |

मेने ये निर्णय किया के भारत माँ को अब और विखंडित और दयनीय स्थिति में नहीं होने देना हे तो मुझे गांधी को मारना ही होगा |

और मेने इसलिए गांधी को मारा…..

मुझे पता हे इसके लिए मुझे फ़ासी होगी | में इसके लिए भी तैयार हु |

और हा यदि मातृभूमि की रक्षा करना अपराध हे तो में यह अपराध बार बार करूँगा |

हर बार करूँगा |

और जब तक सिन्ध नदी पुनः अखंड हिन्द में न बहने लगे तब तक मेरी अस्थियो का विसर्जन नहीं करना |

मुझे फ़ासी देते वक्त मेरे एक हाथ में केसरिया ध्वज और दूसरे हाथ में अखंड भारत का नक्शा हो |

में फ़ासी चढ़ते वक्त अखंड भारत की जय जय बोलना चाहूँगा |

हे भारत माँ !

मुझे दुःख हे में तेरी इतनी ही सेवा कर पाया….

  • नथ्थुराम गोडसे

 

कृपया शेयर जरूर करें ताकि जानकारी सब तक पहुँचाने की. कोशिश करें |

 

TREACHERY OF OMAR ABDULLAH

From: Mohan Tatarajan < >

 

TREACHERY OF OMAR ABDULLAH

AND HIS MUSLIMS DELEGATION

———————————————————————————–

Hindus were the original inhabitants of the valley. Muslims were the invaders.

Omar and Farook encouraged the massacre and ethnic cleansing of Hindus

in Kashmir. NC AND CONGRESS, despite ruling J&K for decades, did not

find any solution to the Kashmir problem. NOW WHY OMAR WANTS

A POLITICAL SOLUTION WITHOUT EXPLAINING, WHAT SORT OF

POLITICAL SOLUTION.

 

Omar should be booked for sedition and must be put behind bars for anti-national

activities. He can be given a choice. Pakistan was created exclusively for

Muslims and Omar and his entire family, can emigrate to Pakistan and enjoy

Hindu free life. He acts like a traitor and a quisling.

 

Our country is paying the price for not listening to Ambedkar. At the time

of partition, Ambedkar told Gandhi to send back all Muslims to Pakistan for

he felt that Muslims can never co-exist with Hindus. How prophetic Ambedkar

was. Now we are paying the price for our pusillanimity.

 

Huntington said that Muslims can never co-exist with other religionists. Prithipal Singh of the Alberta University, Canada said THAT MUSLIMS WILL ALWAYS LIVE AS AN OPPRESSIVE MAJORITY AND A TURBULENT MINORITY.

Omar and others are proving him right.

 

Our government should tell Pakistan, Omar, Farook and other Muslims leaders in congress THAT A SOLUTION TO KASHMIR PROBLEM CAN BE FOUND IF PAKISTAN TAKES BACK* ALL MUSLIMS FROM INDIA (1947, Pakistan was created exclusively for Muslims and because of Gandhi’s stupidity, we are getting cut in every place by the secular Muslims) and THEY CAN SEND BACK ALL HINDUS TO INDIA.

 

In this way, Pakistan can be happy to be free from Hindu devils AND INDIA CAN BE DOUBLY HAPPY WITHOUT THE TROUBLE OF MUSLIM ANGELS.

 

*Skanda987’s comment: Why request, suggest, or ask Pak to do it? To talk like that is weakness. Bhaarat needs to send back or send to haven all the invaded Muslims in Kashmir without any declaration or hint about the action, which must start suddenly and finish complexly quickly. Bhaarat need not worry about the world opinion. When Paki illegally occupied Kashmir, the world did not car, nor the UN. When Russia occupied Cremia, the world did not care. We do not need anyone’s permission or support to get back what is ours. – Skanda987

 

KASHMIR IS BURNING – A FACTUAL SYNOPSIS

From: Deva Sharan Samaroo < >

KASHMIR IS BURNING A FACTUAL SYNOPSIS

 

WHY OMAR ABDULLA N ENTOURAGE DID NOT APPEAL FOR THE STONE THROWING YOUTHS TO CALM DOWN BEFORE ACCUSING THE DEFENCE FORCES

= SUCH DUPLICITY ARE THEY AGENTS OF ISI N PAKISTAN

READ THE TRUTH BELOW

In spite of Pakistan’s best efforts, Kashmir will always remain an integral part of India, and we will grow stronger with time

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Killer rollers -marg

 

 

Media and trouble makers thrive on mischief. Everyday, Kashmir is in the news, and its usually portrayed maliciously by many of these elements that India is inhuman, steeped in illegality and is evil.

 

First the facts.

As per international law, all of Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India. This was effected by the treaty of accession signed between the Maharaja of Kashmir and India on 27th Oct 1947.

  1. Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh consists of 22 districts, separatist are present only in 5 districts – which represents a mere 15% of the state, and they are all Sunni Muslim. The voices and faces you see on television like Omar Abdullah, Mehbooba Mufti, Yasin Malik, Shabbir Shah, Gilani, Asiya Andrabi and Lone are from this region and sect.
  2. The state has 12% Shia Muslims, 12-14% Gujjar Muslims and 8% Pahadi Rajput Muslims. It also has significant population of Sufis, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists and Hindus. None of these communities have any separatist demands.
  3. The larger two of the three regions of the state consisting of Jammu and Ladakh covering an area of 85,000 square kilometers are not Muslim majority areas, and there has never been any demand of separatism.
  4. When the terrorist Afzal Guru was hanged, the media made it appear as if the entire state was out on the streets. The reality was that out of 22 districts, there was not a single demonstration in 17 districts and only 5 districts in the Valley saw staged demonstrations.
  5. Poonch has 90% and Kargil 90% Muslims, but there was no protest in these areas.
  6. Our perception about Jammu and Kashmir is that a battle between nationalism and separatism is going on for the past 68 years. Nationalism has neither been lost nor will it, because in most areas of the state, majority of the people are nationalists.
  7. The only legal dispute tenable under international law is, How India should get back areas that are under the illegal occupation of Pakistan and China?

_________________________

 

White fire – Vasi V 352

 

‘Separatism’, ‘dispute’ and ‘autonomy’ are three myths raised by Pakistan and her agents within Kashmir and other parts of India

The State should be considered as one entity like Jammu (with maximum of the ground area), Ladakh and only thereafter Kashmir.

 

Pakistan and India baiters have been harping on

United Nations Security Council Resolution 47.

The resolution identifies Pakistan as an occupying force and states that in order to bring peace and harmony, the following steps will be undertaken in sequence.

  1. First Pakistan must demilitarise and withdraw ALL its military forces and nationals used for the purpose of fighting from Kashmir.
  2. Subsequently India must demilitarise Kashmir
  3. A plebiscite may be held to determine the will of the people of Kashmir.

 

Since Pakistan failed to demilitarise, the entire process of normalisation went into a tailspin. That was in 1947, it is now 2016. In November 2010 the United Nations removed Jammu and Kashmir from its list of disputed territories.This UN Resolution is thus dead.

 

Secondly, the resolution was passed by United Nations Security Council under chapter VI of UN Charter.Resolutions passed under Chapter VI of UN charter are considered non binding and have no mandatory enforceability.

 

Since the government and the armed forces do not speak on the issue, the reporting is left mainly to separatist leaders and politicians, Jihadi terrorists, and the media. That most of these people and organisations who owe their loyalty and livelihood to foreigners, the reports will unjustifiably portray India in a bad light.

 

Muslim Pakistan’s national identity is defined by a single dimension of being anti India and the destruction of secular India. Fake issues and imaginary threats from India are constantly raked up to provide justification for the Pakistan army to control the reins of power. Pakistan has lost all the wars they have waged against India. Pakistan claims concern for muslim brothers in Kashmir, while simultaneously abducting, torturing and exterminating large number of Baluchis,and Pashtuns, shows its desire for conflict with India.

Pakistan because of its terrorist activities and toxic behaviour, is on very bad terms and in conflict with all its neighbours be it India, Afghanistan or Bangladesh.

 

The Pakistani leadership and Army have bankrupted and impoverished Pakistan by wasting money and resources on useless confrontations. Pakistan is using Kashmir merely as an issue to harm India by waging a proxy war using terrorism, with the hope of bleeding India with a thousand cuts.

The ONLY condition required is PUT THE COUNTRY ABOVE YOUR RELIGION is also the guarantee for peace and prosperity in the whole world. Prophets come and go but Mother Earth is eternal. Hence our FIRST loyalty should be to MOTHER figuratively and literally.

Truly great are those who honour their mothers and also as logical extension their COUNTRY.

 

In spite of Pakistan’s best efforts, Kashmir will always remain an integral part of India, and we will grow stronger with time.

 

How to Purge out Islam

How to Purge out Islam

from any Non-Muslim country

By Suresh Vyas

The internet free media has helped the world know very well truthfully how barbaric, intolerant, anti-democratic cancerous Islam is. Therefore, as of now (Aug. 2016) Angola has declared Islam illegal, China and Myanmar have taken many measures to curb Islam.

Purging out Islam from, or declaring it illegal in, a non-Muslim democracy is possible as long as the non-Muslim people are in majority and with unity they determine to purge out Islam. They will need to amend constitution clearly declaring any anti-democracy religion or ideology illegal. Once the constitution is amended thus, it will be very easy to purge out Islam. While effort to amend the constitution are going on, the government / people can do the following:

  1. Do not give permission for separate Sharia law for Muslims
  2. Do not give permission to run Muslims schools (madressas)
  3. Do not give permission to build mosques
  4. Declare distribution or sale of Koran, Hadith, and Sura illegal
  5. Ban blocking streets by Muslims for namaaz (Islamic prayer)
  6. Ban burkha
  7. Ban halaal meat sales or advertisements
  8. Do not declare any Muslim holiday as national holiday
  9. Ban use of Arabic in mosques (allow only the national language in mosques)
  10. Forbid Islamic holiday celebrations
  11. Ban foreign mullahs or Muslim preachers to enter in country
  12. Do not allow loudspeakers on mosques
  13. Declare illegal the possession of arms, weapons, or explosives by Muslims
  14. Ban entry back in the country for those Muslims who go pilgrimage to Macca and Madina
  15. Declare a law that says no Muslim man can divorce his wife saying, “tallaaq, tallaaq, tallaaq”
  16. Make legal marriage age above 17 years
  17. Punish all those who support or make any effort in cutting clitoris of girls
  18. Ban any ritual that causes injury to children
  19. Economically boycott Muslims. That is, with unity no one will ever buy or sell any product or service from any Muslim no matter what
  20. Encourage Muslims to quit Islam by social, intellectual, political, and economic pressures

8 Brave Indian Kings and Queens

From: Murli dhar Gupta < >

 

8 Brave Indian Kings and Queens

Who Died for Their Kingdoms and Refused to Surrender

Our country was once a land of brave kings and queens who took every arrow and blow upon themselves to save their kingdoms from alien powers. Whether it was the British or the Greeks, these Indian kings and queens proved to be great obstacles between them and their cunning plans of taking over the country. Here are 8 kings and queens that Indian history is thankful to for their courage and valor.

  1. Porus

Or King Puru or Paurava was the king between the regions of the Hydaspes (Jhelum) and Acesines (Chenab) rivers, which is now Punjab. The famous battle of Jhelum which was fought between him and Alexander is known to be one of the most significant battles in history. The battle was fought despite heavy monsoons lashing the battlefield. King Porus and his resistance made Alexander change his mind and he backed off by offering Porus to join him as a minister in his council.

  1. Maharana Pratap

Mewar’s Maharana Pratap never bowed down to Akbar’s demands. Maharana Pratap refused to sign the peace treaty with Akbar which made the Shahenshah plot evil plans against Pratap and his kingdom. It is said that Pratap and his family had to thrive on bread made of grass because his own people turned against them. He bravely fought the Battle of Haldighati, where he lost his beloved horse Chetak.

  1. Chatrapati Shivaji

Chhatrapati Shivaji is considered a great inspiration in Maharashtra. The Maratha King fought the cruel Adilshahi sultanate till his last breath. From innovating smart war tactics like guerilla warfare to escaping the Agra prison by hiding in a sweet box, he has given some great chapters to history that people derive inspiration from until today. He continued his struggle against the Mughals till his death, which occurred when he was 52 years old.

  1. Rani of Jhansi

Rani Laxmibai was considered a massive threat to the British empire. With her son on her back, Laxmibai was forced to fight a battle with the Britishers, as she refused to give away her empire. It is said that she was shot by a British soldier in her abdomen and that she told a hermit to burn her down rather than getting captured by the British. She died at the young age of 22.

  1. Chandragupta Maurya

The founder of the Maurya Empire had to withstand the pressure of giving up his kingdom by the Greeks and he successfully did so with his war tactics. Chandragupta defeated Alexander’s successor Seleucus I Nicator and married his daughter to establish friendship with the Greeks. With the help of his smart advisor Chanakya, Chandragupta Maurya went on to win many battles against alien powers that existed within India. He embraced death by embracing the path of Sallekhana.

  1. Tipu Sultan

The ruler of Mysore strategically fought against British Colonialism. He was, in fact, one of the first Indian kings to be martyred on the battlefield while defending his kingdom against the Colonial British. His sword, today, sits at the Wallace Collection, No. 1 Manchester Square, in London.

  1. Rani Padmavati

Rani Padmavati was the main reason Allaudin Khilji decided to take over Chittor. After hearing about the queen’s beauty, Allaudin Khilji decided to march on Chittor to capture her from her husband Rana Ratansen. Rani Padmavati refused to surrender. Therefore, she ignited a pyre and performed Jauhar, where she asked the women of Chittor to jump in too. Khilji had to return disappointed as the women of Chittor committed suicide instead of facing dishonour at his hands.

  1. Yashwantrao Holkar

Known as the Napoleon of India, the British Empire was very cautious of every move the Indore king made, as he was considered the biggest threat to the empire. He was the one who initiated the process of unifying Indian kings against the British and prevented them from signing cunning treaties where the British took over their entire kingdoms in the name of peace. His patriotism towards his country made the British people/rulers go green with envy. Once, in a letter to General Gerard Lake, he wrote the following lines that showed his love for his country – “My country and property are upon the saddle of my horse, and please God, to whatever side the reins of the horses of my brave warriors shall be turned, the whole of the country in that direction shall come into my possession. As you are wise and provident, you will consider the consequences of this affair, and employ yourself in settling the important matters which will be explained by my agents.”

 

About Cows

From: Dirgha Raj Prasai < >

 

About Cows

 

A cow’s milk is highly nutritious that its advantages are hard to explain. A cow gives plenty of milk besides her own café. There is enough milk provided by cow for the entire family otherwise it will go into the drain. That is the Nature Laws. Those who keep cows benefit economically in numerous ways by selling its milk and running a dairy.

 

Milk cleanses our body and keeps it healthy as well as increases our intellectual power. There is no need to explain the advantages of the products of a cow. It is written in the Artha Veda that cows’ extinction from earth would result in Sun’s increase in temperature that would ultimately destroy the planet. This shows that the earth and cow have a significant relation. This Vedic expression can be understood in a simple meaning that the relation between the two is conditional and dependent. Those who drink and use cow’s milk, proved brilliant and intellectual. And the buffalo’s milk user has been proved dull and blunt. The cow’s urine (Gauut) and dung can turn soil fertile and help crops to grow. The grasses that sprout from the soil, straw, stalk, and other grains can be used as fodder for cow which retains the traditional balance. A cow’s significance is huge. We need to open the discussion, which is highly necessary, if we should consume cow’s meat or not. During the Vedic period the Risihis’ had observed a ritual sacrifice of the cow which brought all curses of diseases as leprosy, Dusadhya, Rajyayachma and Ohjayachma different kinds of diseases that led the Rishis to their death. So the ritual was not observed. To consume the cow’s meat can be compared to consuming slow poison. The killing of cow and its sacrifice was banned. To eat cow’s meat is in reality like consuming poison.

 

Those who are used to eating beef have low immunity resistance, and they easily fall prey to the diseases, which ultimately claim their lives; so all sectors ought to be alert to this danger. In Saudi Arab to take a picture of Lord Shiva is banned, it is prohibited. In

similar manner if beef is allowed to enter the holy land of Nepal for the consumption by tourists the government ought to impose strict regulation against it. It is the subject of the sensitivity of this land. In the name of secularism no one has the right to kill the

aspirations of the majority in the interest of the minority of the country. However, it is said that the cow from the Himwat-khanda region and that from western countries some differ considerably. There are logics that claim the consumption of cow meat in western nation is less dangerous than what it would be in this region. The environment and the geographical environment create such difference between the east and western regions. British grass cannot be used for religious rites of Hindus. If the grass sprouting in any other places than Himwat-khanda cannot be used for Hindu rituals then there must be some difference in terms of cow too-as some logics have pointed out. In western nation it is said that consuming cow meat does not bring diseases, but drinking urine brings great illness. But in Himwat-khanda it is the reverse.

 

Drinking cow urine cures diseases, where as other animal’s urine can be fatal. The cow’s meat eaters are the sufferers of leprosy and death in decay.

 

Once there was news that people in Britain went mad and became ill after consuming cow’s meat. They had even stopped consuming cow’s meat. Then, the British government banned cow’s meat. In many beef eating countries banned the beef from Britain. After that, some Britain’s media reported that, so many British left eating cows’ meat. If a person suffering from arthritis consumes sheep’s meat, and if a person with pressure consumes the meat of a castrated goat then they suffer from unnecessary thoughts. If a person eats beef that person suffers from bad breath. There must have been an ulcer inside the stomach. To eat goat’s meat for the blood- pressure patients and to eat the sheep’s meat for the rheumatism patients will harmful. So, the beef is also becoming the causes of the obesity and increases cholesterol level which is very dangerous for heart. Sometimes it also spread diseases like e-coli and b-coli.

 

An Indian cultural export Subodh Kumar writes – ‘The Enemies of civilized behavior think that cows cannot defend themselves. They kill cows, but by their conduct such persons, fire the hearts of right mind men who hound such enemies of civilized behavior to punish them here on earth in this world and the next world.

 

‘न ब्राह्मणो हिंसितव्यो3ग्निः प्रियतनोरिव ।

सोमो ह्य स्य दायद इन्द्गो अस्याभिशस्तिपाः ॥ अथर्व 5-18-6

They (Cows) should never be killed. They provide with warmth and comfort like fire, provide the highest forms of intellect, and fill the individuals with qualities strength and valor to be victorious in all situations.

 

शतापाष्ठां नि गिरति तां न शक्नोति निःखिदन्‌ ।

अन्नं यो ब्रह्मणां मल्वः स्वाद्व द्यीति मन्यते ॥ अथर्व 5-18-7

The unfortunate persons, who kill and rejoice in eating their (cow’s) flesh, suffer with innumerable maladies from which they can never recover.

http://subodh-vedainspirations.blogspot.com

 

Arun Upadhyay writes – ‘It is rightly stated that cow milk and not meat is good for human beings. Actually, it is for whole world. But only the fanaticism against Hinduism has started killing of cows. Cow milk is used all over the world for infants as substitute for mother’s milk and for persons of all ages. Thus, cow is literally mother for humanity and we cannot show any disrespect to mother. Actually, in Islam itself, highest obligation is called ‘Doodh ka karj’ gratefulness for milk offered by mother ‘

 

Thank you