Some notes on Muhammad

From: sri venkat < >

Some notes on Muhammad

The references below are from original Muslims’ sources.

 

source: http://www.4truth.net/fourtruthpbworld.aspx?pageid=8589953043

 

“Although Muhammad patiently endured persecution in Mecca, his attitude quickly changed when his numbers grew in Medina. Soon he would tolerate no criticism whatsoever. According to our earliest biographical source, a man named Abu Afak—who was more than a hundred years old—wrote a poem criticizing people for converting to Islam. Muhammad demanded he be killed, and Abu Afak was murdered in his sleep. When a woman named Asma heard that Muslims had killed such an elderly man, she wrote a poem calling for people to take a stand against Islam.Ibn Ishaq relates what happened next:

 

When the apostle heard what she had said he said, “Who will rid me of Marwan’s daughter?” Umayr bin Adiy al-Khatmi who was with him heard him, and that very night he went to her house and killed her. In the morning he came to the apostle and told him what he had done and he said, “You have helped God and His apostle, O Umayr!” When he asked if he would have to bear any evil consequences the apostle said, “Two goats won’t butt their heads about her,” so Umayr went back to his people.v

 

Muhammad’s violence was directed towards groups as well. Muhammad once said to his followers, “I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslims.” The Jews of Qurayza resisted Muhammad and attempted to form an alliance against him. When the alliance faltered, Muhammad acted quickly. His armies surrounded them and “besieged them for twenty-five nights until they were sore pressed and God cast terror into their hearts.”

 

Then they surrendered, and the apostle confined them in Medina. . . . Then the apostle went out to the market of Medina (which is still its market today) and dug trenches in it. Then he sent for them and struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out to him in batches. . . . There were 600 or 700 in all, though some put the figure as high as 800 or 900.vii

 

Every male who had reached puberty was killed. Muhammad divided the women, children, and property among his men (taking a fifth of the spoils for himself).

 

V. MUHAMMAD: THE UGLY

 

But things get worse.As the Muslim armies raided town after town, they captured many women, who would often be sold or traded. Yet, since the Muslim men were a long way from their wives, they needed wisdom from Allah to guide them in their treatment of their female captives. It wasn’t long before Muhammad received a revelation allowing the soldiers to sleep with the women:

 

Allah’s Messenger sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them. Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions of Allah’s Messenger seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women because of their husbands being polytheists. Then Allah, Most High, sent down regarding that: “And women already married, except those whom your right hands possess (iv. 24)” (i.e. they were lawful for them when their ‘Idda period came to an end).viii

 

This verse of the Qur’an (4:24), along with others (23:1-6; 33:50; 70:22-30), granted Muslims the right to have sex with their female captives and slave girls, even those who were still married or who were going to be sold or traded.

 

Perhaps most disturbing of all is the fact that Muslims could have sex with girls who hadn’t even reached puberty. The opening verses of Chapter 65 of the Qur’an present Islamic rules for divorce. According to 65:4, if a Muslim divorces a girl who hasn’t yet reached puberty, he must wait three months to make sure she isn’t pregnant.

 

Muhammad himself had sex with a prepubescent girl. His courtship of Aisha began when she was only six years old.ix Muhammad had a dream about her, which led him to believe that God wanted him to marry the young girl.x Fortunately, Muhammad waited three years before having sex with her; nevertheless, Muslim sources report that Aisha still hadn’t reached puberty.xi Since Muhammad is the moral exemplar in Islam, his actions are still affecting young girls today.”

 

iIbn Ishaq, Sirat Rasul Allah (The Life of Muhammad), A. Guillaume, tr. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1980), p. 106.

ii See, e.g., Qur’an 109.

iii M. H. Shakir Translation.

iv Ibn Ishaq, p. 596.

v Ibid., p. 676.

vi Sahih Muslim 4366.

vii Ibn Ishaq, p. 464.

viii Sahih Muslim 3432.

ix Sahih Al-Bukhari 3894.

x Ibid., Number 3895.

xi See Sahih al-Bukhari 5236 and 6130.

 

MUHAMMAD DIES DURING SEX WITH AISHA SUCKING HER BREAST

MUHAMMAD DIES DURING SEX WITH AISHA SUCKING HER BREAST

From: Satya D < >

As much as disgusting the truth from Islamic scriptures is, what is bewildering is this inhumane and unsatiable lusty creature who has no bounds for any kind of reason is treated as prophet.   (It is) Sad that Muslims are stuck in their head and cannot get out of it.

There was a touchy video on CNN sometime ago about a Saudi woman crying for her 5 year old daughter who was given as a bride to a 50+ year old man to settle a financial dispute.   Does this help Muslims?  No, all this is a disaster for humanity.  See what is happening to Iranians and what Muslims do in turn to Christians, Hindus where they are majority.    Time we stop this disaster or we are going to leave generations to come, our children and thereafter pay a big price.   Saudi and other mullahs call for jihad and have you ever seen them being a suicide bomber.   It is unwitting young Muslims, brainwashed into utter trash who end up giving up their lives, for nothing.   What has Islam left for Muslims?  Their women suppressed under veil as a baby creating machine, one among several wives, at least in major section of Muslims.  While others are busy developing technologically and producing Nobel prizes, developing in arts and science, they produce terrorists and serve as parasites destroying the very people giving them better life.    Stuck in this trash, they want to drag everyone else for what, you wonder.

Regards,
Satya

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: yogesh saxena <>
Date: Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:24 PM
Subject: MUHAMMAD DIES DURING SEX WITH AISHA SUCKING HER BREAST

Muhammad Dies During Sex With Aisha Sucking Her Breast

This is one amazing hilarious fact that your Ulamas will never tell you. Muhammad dies while having sex with Aisha. Did he die during foreplay or  > while humping 18 year old Aisha? From the Hadith below, we know that he french kissed Aisha by sucking her saliva, and later he met his final destination while sucking Aisha’s big breast. Probably he had a heart attack. You know, old man having sex with young girl. Young girl played rough during sex and dirty old man’s heart couldn’t handle it.  Can you see how this dirty old man was acting like a spoiled brat?

 

This hypocrite munafiq commanded you Muslims to be fair to all of your four wives, but he himself could not be fair to his own wives. If he wanted to sleep with Aisha instead of his other wives, why doesn’t he say so? Why must he ask “Where shall I stay tomorrow? Where shall I stay tomorrow?”
Did Muhammad manage to say “La Ilaha Illa Allah?” Is there any Hadith to support this? If he did not managed to say “La Ilaha Illa Allah” then probably other Muslims who died after saying “La Ilaha Illa Allah” died a better death than Muhammad. From the Hadith below, it seems that Muhammad did not manage to say “La Ilaha Illa Allah.” Probably he died an atheist saying “La Ilaha” (There is no god). The most evil man in history finally died on June 8, 632 C.E. in Madinah.

 

That explains why he was buried in the room of Aisha.  Sahih Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 62, Number 144: Narrated `Aisha:  that during his fatal ailment, Allah’s Apostle, used to ask his wives, “Where shall I stay tomorrow? Where shall I stay tomorrow?” He was looking forward to Aisha’s turn. So all his wives allowed him to stay where he wished; and he stayed at `Aisha’s house till he died there. `Aisha added: He died on the day of my usual turn at my house. Allah took him unto Him while his head was between my chest and my neck, and his saliva was mixed with my saliva. I wonder whether they managed to get rid of Muhammad’s rigor mortis hard-on which is sticking straight up in the air and if they don’t do something, it will look odd at the funeral. That could explain the reason why they waited for 2 days to bury Muhammad. That also explains why he was buried in the room of Aisha.
Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 6, Number 299: Narrated `Abdur-Rahman bin  Al-Aswad: (on the authority of his father) `Aisha said: “Whenever Allah’s   Apostle wanted to fondle anyone of us during her periods (menses), he used  to order her to put on an Izar and start fondling her.” `Aisha added, “None of you could control his sexual desires as the Prophet could.”  Sahih Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 62, Number 6: Narrated Anas: The Prophet I used to go round (have sexual relations with) all his wives in one night, and he had nine wives.  From Ibn Hisham page 682: that he heard Aisha [one of Muhammad’s wives] say: “The apostle died in my bosom during my turn: [the night Muhammad was to spend sleeping with her] I had wronged none in regard to him. It was due to my ignorance and extreme youth that the apostle died in my arms.”
http://centreright.in/2012/09/innocence-of-muslims-an-unreasonable-controversy/#.UFnXkbJmS8E

 

Freedom of Goa Videos – In Hindi

Freedom of Goa Videos

In Hindi

Part-1 : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RObk8XNMkM

Part-2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLvqzQYnMHo&feature=relmfu

Part-3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyeMQO96IKI&feature=relmfu

Part-4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZiVFfHvpO4

Part-5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_-0qNoqur8&feature=relmfu

Part-6: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gFRGcp0V4I&feature=relmfu

Part-7:

 

Book:

The Goa Inquisition: Being a quarter-century commentation study of the inquisition in India

by Anant Kakba Priolkar (Author)

 

“Wage wars,” said Pope Leo X in 1515

“Wage wars,” said Pope Leo X in 1515

And we also know that Pope Pius XI had once said that the principal duty of the papacy was to plant the church in all countries of the world.

 

The Church came to the East in dramatic circumstances. Pope Leo X had the following words to say to king Manoel of Portugal in 1515:

 

« Receive this warlike sword in your always victorious and warlike hands. With this you will wage wars under the most happy auspices you will subject the enemies of the Faith, as you have done up to now […] [May] you use your force, strength, and power against the fury of the infidels may you consecrate, not only your most religious spirit, but also the kingdom itself, and the forces of the kingdom, to the giver of them, to God the best and the greatest, so that having received through this gift the help of heaven in battles, you may bring back abundant spoils and most famous triumphs »2.

 

Source: http://www.lusotopie.sciencespobordeaux.fr/borges.pdf

 

Details of the Goa Inquisition

Details of the Goa Inquisition

by Christian historian, Dr. T. R. de Souza

Source: http://mahavansa.blogspot.com/2006/06/details-of-goa-inquisition-by.html

At least from 1540 onwards, and in the island of Goa before that year, all the Hindu idols had been annihilated or had disappeared, all the temples had been destroyed and their sites and building material was in most cases utilized to erect new Christian Churches and chapels. Various viceregal and Church council decrees banished the Hindu priests from the Portuguese territories; the public practices of Hindu rites including marriage rites, were banned; the state took upon itself the task of bringing up Hindu orphan children; the Hindus were denied certain employments, while the Christians were preferred; it was ensured that the Hindus would not harass those who became Christians, and on the contrary, the Hindus were obliged to assemble periodically in Churches to listen to preaching or to the refutation of their religion.”

“A particularly grave abuse was practiced in Goa in the form of ‘mass baptism’ and what went before it. The practice was begun by the Jesuits and was alter initiated by the Franciscans also. The Jesuits staged an annual mass baptism on the Feast of the Conversion of St. Paul (January 25), and in order to secure as many neophytes as possible, a few days before the ceremony the Jesuits would go through the streets of the Hindu quarter in pairs, accompanied by their Negro slaves, whom they would urge to seize the Hindus. When the blacks caught up a fugitive, they would smear his lips with a piece of beef, making him an ‘untouchable’ among his people. Conversion to Christianity was then his only option.”

The Goan inquisition is regarded by all contemporary portrayals as the most violent inquisition ever executed by the Portuguese Catholic Church. It lasted from 1560 to 1812. The inquisition was set as a tribunal, headed by a judge, sent to Goa from Portugal and was assisted by two judicial henchmen. The judge was answerable to no one except to Lisbon and handed down punishments as he saw fit. The Inquisition Laws filled 230 pages and the palace where the Inquisition was conducted was known as the Big House and the Inquisition proceedings were always conducted behind closed shutters and closed doors. The screams of agony of the culprits (men, women, and children) could be heard in the streets, in the stillness of the night, as they were brutally interrogated, flogged, and slowly dismembered in front of their relatives. Eyelids were sliced off and extremities were amputated carefully, a person could remain conscious even though the only thing that remained was his torso and a head.

Diago de Boarda, a priest and his advisor Vicar General, Miguel Vazz had made a 41 point plan for torturing Hindus. Under this plan Viceroy Antano de Noronha issued in 1566, an order applicable to the entire area under Portuguese rule :
“I hereby order that in any area owned by my master, the king, nobody should construct a Hindu temple and such temples already constructed should not be repaired without my permission. If this order is transgressed, such temples shall be, destroyed and the goods in them shall be used to meet expenses of holy deeds, as punishment of such transgression.”

In 1567 the campaign of destroying temples in Bardez met with success. At the end of it 300 Hindu temples were destroyed. Enacting laws, prohibition was laid from December 4, 1567 on rituals of Hindu marriages, sacred thread wearing and cremation. All the persons above 15 years of age were compelled to listen to Christian preaching, failing which they were punished.

A religious fatva was issued on the basis of the findings of Goa Inquiry Commission. It stated,”…Hereby we declare the decision that the conventions mentioned in the preamble of the fatva as stated below are permanently declared as useless, and therefore prohibited”.

Prohibitions Regarding Marriages

-The instruments for Hindu songs shall not be played.
-While giving dowry the relatives of the bride and groom must not be invited.
-At the time of marriage, betel leaf packages (pan) must not be distributed either publicly or in private to the persons present.

-Flowers, or fried puris, betel nuts and leaves must not be sent to the heads of the houses of the bride or groom.

-Gotraj ceremony of family God must not be performed.
-On the day prior to a wedding, rice must not be husked, spices must not be pounded, grains must not be ground and other recipes for marriage feast must not be cooked.

-Pandals and festoons must not be used.
-Pithi should not be applied.
-The bride must not be accorded ceremonial welcome. The bride and groom must not -be made to sit under pandal to convey blessings and best wishes to them.

Prohibitions Regarding Fasts, Post-death Rituals

-The poor must not be fed or ceremonial meals must not be served for the peace of the souls of the dead.
-There should be no fasting on ekadashi day.
-Fasting can be done according to the Christian principles.
-No rituals should be performed on the twelfth day after death, on moonless and full moon dates.
-No fasting should be done during lunar eclipse.

Conventions

-Hindu men should not wear dhoti either in public or in their houses. Women should not wear cholis .
-They should not plant Tulsi in their houses, compounds, gardens or any other place.

-Following the law of 1567, orphans were kidnapped for converting them to Christianity.

On September 22, 1570 an order was issued that :
-The Hindus embracing Christianity will be exempted from land taxes for a period of 15 years.
-Nobody shall bear Hindu names or surnames.

In 1583 Hindu temples at Esolna and Kankolim were destroyed through army action.
“The fathers of the Church forbade the Hindus under terrible penalties the use of their own sacred books, and prevented them from all exercise of their religion. They destroyed their temples, and so harassed and interfered with the people that they abandoned the city in large numbers, refusing to remain any longer in a place where they had no liberty, and were liable to imprisonment, torture and death if they worshipped after their own fashion the gods of their fathers.” wrote Sasetti, who was in India from 1578 to 1588.
An order was issued in June 1684 eliminating Konkani language and making it compulsory to speak Portuguese language. The law provided for dealing toughly with anyone using the local language. Following that law all the symbols of non-Christian sects were destroyed and the books written in local languages were burnt.

The Archbishop living on the banks of the Ethora had said during one of his lecture series, “The post of Inquiry Commission in Goa is regarded as holy.” The women who opposed the assistants of the commission were put behind the bars and were used by them to satisfy their animal instincts. Then they were burnt alive as opponents of the established tenets of the Catholic church.
The victims of such inhuman laws of the Inquiry Commission included a French traveller named Delone. He was an eye witness to the atrocities, cruelty and reign of terror unleashed by priests. He published a book in 1687 describing the lot of helpless victims. While he was in jail he had heard the cries of tortured people beaten with instruments having sharp teeth. All these details are noted in Delone’s book.

So harsh and notorious was the inquisition in Goa, that word of its brutality and horrors reached Lisbon but nothing was done to stop this notoriety and escalating barbarity and it continued for two hundred more years. No body knows the exact number of Goans subjected to these diabolical tortures, but perhaps it runs into hundreds of thousands, may be even more. The abominations of inquisitions continued until a brief respite was given in 1774 but four years later, the inquisition was introduced again and it continued un-interruptedly until 1812. At that point in time, in the year of 1812, the British put pressure on the Portuguese to put an end to the terror of Inquisition and the presence of British troops in Goa enforced the British desire. Also the Portuguese power at this time was declining and they could not fight the British. The palace of the Grand Inquisitor, the Big House, was demolished and no trace of it remains today, which might remind someone of inquisitions and the horrors inside this Big House that their great saint Francis Xavier had commenced.

Dr. Trasta Breganka Kunha, a Catholic citizen of Goa writes, “Inspite of all the mutilations and concealment of history, it remains an undoubted fact that religious conversion of Goans is due to methods of force adopted by the Portuguese to establish their rule. As a result of this violence the character of our people was destroyed. The propagation of Christian sect in Goa came about not by religious preaching but through the methods of violence and pressure. If any evidence is needed for this fact, we can obtain it through law books, orders and reports of the local rulers of that time and also from the most dependable documents of the Christian sect

(http://www.christianaggression.org/item_display.php?type=ARTICLES&id=1111142225)

 

It cannot be said Gandhi was a Hindu at heart. A Hindi article

From: yogesh saxena < >

गो हत्या का सद्भाव

http://vishwajeetsingh1008|blogspot|in/2011/04/blog-post_2050.html

 

15 अगस्त 1947 को भारत के आजाद होने पर देश के कोने – कोने से लाखों पत्र और तार प्रायः सभी जागरूक व्यक्तियों तथा सार्वजनिक संस्थाओं द्वारा भारतीय संविधान परिषद के अध्यक्ष डॉ० राजेन्द्र प्रसाद के माध्यम से गांधी जी को भेजे गये जिसमें उन्होंने मांग की थी कि अब देश स्वतन्त्र हो गया हैं अतः गौहत्या को बन्द करा दो । तब पाकपिता गांधी ने कहा, “राजेन्द्र बाबू ने मुझको बताया कि उनके यहाँ करीब 50 हजार पोस्ट कार्ड , 25 – 30 हजार पत्र और कई हजार तार आ गये हैं। हिन्दुस्तान में गौ – हत्या रोकने का कोई कानून बन ही नहीं सकता । इसका मतलब तो जो हिन्दू नहीं हैं , उनके साथ जबरदस्ती करना होगा| जो आदमी अपने आप गौकुशी नहीं रोकना चाहते , उनके साथ मैं कैसे जबरदस्ती करूँ कि वह ऐसा करें।

 

इसलिए मैं तो यह कहूँगा कि तार और पत्र भेजने का सिलसिला बन्द होना चाहिये इतना पैसा इन पर फैंक देना मुनासिब नहीं हैं । मैं तो अपनी मार्फत सारे हिन्दुस्तान को यह सुनाना चाहता हूँ कि वे सब तार और पत्र भेजना बन्द कर दें । भारतीय यूनियन कांग्रेस में मुसलमान , ईसाई आदि सभी लोग रहते हैं । अतः मैं तो यही सलाह दूँगा कि विधान – परिषद् पर इसके लिये जोर न डाला जाये । ( पुस्तक – धर्मपालन भाग – दो , प्रकाशक – सस्ता साहित्य मंडल , नई दिल्ली , पृष्ठ – 135 )—— [[[  it means ghaandhii ( GANDHI ) was anti – hinduu to start with —-  ]]]

 

गौहत्या पर कानूनी प्रतिबन्ध को अनुचित बताते हुए इसी आशय के विचार गांधी जी ने प्रार्थना सभा में दिये –

 

” हिन्दुस्तान में गौ-हत्या रोकने का कोई कानून बन ही नहीं सकता । इसका मतलब तो जो हिन्दू नहीं हैं उनके साथ जबरदस्ती करना होगा । ” – प्रार्थना सभा ‘ ( 25 जुलाई 1947 )

 

—- [[[  what a  ANTI – HINDUU gaandhii is —  ]]]

 

हिन्दुस्तान ( 26 जुलाई 1947 ) , हरिजन एवं हरिजन सेवक ( 26 जुलाई 1947 )

 

अपनी 4 नवम्बर 1947 की प्रार्थना सभा में गांधी जी ने फिर कहा कि –

 

” भारत कोई हिन्दू धार्मिक राज्य नहीं हैं , इसलिए हिन्दुओं के धर्म को दूसरों पर जबरदस्ती नहीं थोपा जा सकता । मैं गौ सेवा में पूरा विश्वास रखता हूँ , परन्तु उसे कानून द्वारा बन्द नहीं किया जा सकता । ”

—- [[[ what a विश्वासघात gaandhiiis !!! —- ]]]

 

 

( दिल्ली डायरी , पृष्ठ 134 से 140 तक )

इससे स्पष्ट हैं कि गांधी जी की गौरक्षा के प्रति कोई आस्था नहीं थी । वह केवल हिन्दुओं की भावनाओं का शौषण करने के लिए बनावटी तौर पर ही गौरक्षा की बात किया करते थे , इसलिए उपयुक्त समय आने पर देश की सनातन आस्थाओं के साथ विश्वासघात कर गये गांधी ।

 

7 नवम्बर 1966 को गोपाष्टमी के दिन गौरक्षा से सम्बन्धित संस्थाओं ने संयुक्त रूप से संसद भवन के सामने एक विशाल प्रदर्शन का आयोजन किया जिसमें तत्कालीन सरकार से गौहत्या बन्दी का कानून बनाने की मांग की गई । इस प्रदर्शन में भारत के प्रत्येक राज्य से करीब 10 – 12 लाख गौभक्त नर – नारी , साधु – संत और छोटे – छोटे बालक – बालिकाएं भी गौमाता की हत्या बन्द कराने इस धर्मयुद्ध में आये थे ।

 

उस समय इंदिरा गांधी प्रधानमंत्री पद पर थी और गुलजारिलाल नन्दा गृहमंत्री थे । श्री नन्दा जी ने प्रधानमंत्री इंदिरा गांधी को परामर्श दिया कि इतनी बडी संख्या में देशभर के सर्व विचारों के जनता की मांग गौहत्या बन्दी का कानून स्वीकार करें । तब इंदिरा गांधी ने कठोरता से कहा ” गौहत्या बन्दी का कानून बनाने से मुसलमान और ईसाई समाज कांग्रेस से नाराज हो जायेंगे । गौहत्या बन्दी का कानून नहीं बन सकता । ” इंदिरा के न मानने पर गुलजारिलाल नन्दा ने अपने गृहमंत्री पद से त्यागपत्र दे दिया और गौभक्त भारतीयों के इतिहास में अमर हो गये ।

 

उधर इंदिरा गांधी ने प्रदर्शन खत्म कराने के लिए निहत्थे अहिंसक गौभक्तों प्रदर्शनकारियों पर गोली चलवा दी जिसमें अनेकों साधुओं व गौभक्तों की हत्याएँ हुई । इंदिरा गांधी ने यह नृशंश हत्याकाण्ड गौपाष्टमी के पर्व पर कराया था अतः विधि का विधान देखिये कि – इंदिरा गांधी की हत्या भी गौपाष्टमी को हुई थी , संजय गांधी की दुर्घटना में मृत्यु भी अष्टमी को हुई , राजीव गांधी की हत्या भी अष्टमी को हुई , गौहत्या के महापाप से गांधी – नेहरू परिवार का नाश हो गया ।

 

स्वतन्त्रता प्राप्ति के इतने दिन बाद भी राष्ट्रीय स्तर पर गौहत्या बन्दी का कानून न बन पाना भारतीयों के लिए बडे ही दुःख और अपमान की बात हैं । हे परमात्मा , नेहरू के वंशजों और गांधी के अनुयायी इन राजनेताओं को सद्बुद्धि दो । भारत की प्राणाधार गौमाता की हत्या बन्दी का कानून सम्प्रदायवाद की भावना से उठकर शीघ्र बने यहीं प्रार्थना हैं ।

 

– विश्वजीतसिंह

 

 

Forget Gandhi. Listen to KrishNa.

From: Rashtra1947@…

2 OCTOBER 2012. Please copy, print or publish freely.

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi

By Kuru

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, the man who selflessly served the interests of the two great imperial powers, ISLAM and BRITAIN, was born at Porbandar, Western India, on 2 October 1869 to wealthy Hindu parents.

Early experiences in London shaped his mind and mentality for the rest of his life. He had gone to England in his impressionable years and though his parents had spent a fortune to see him qualify as a barrister in England, his stay there was not a happy one. He was not accepted as equal, coming to the heart of Imperial Britain from a disdained slave colony. In streets he was subjected to racist taunts and called “Blackie”, “Nigger”, even “Baboon”.

This had lasting effect on his personality and outlook. He came to see Britain as a “lion” and himself as a “goat”. So, the “goat” could only use the weapon of non violence and protest by “fasting unto death” and peaceful unarmed marches and shouting slogans.

After return from South Africa, where again he was insulted and locked up unceremoniously, abused and beaten up by White men, he was convinced that armed struggle was futile and, so, put the country on the road of long suffering.

That was just what the British rulers had wanted. None was a better ally than Gandhi to pacify and disarm the slaves and ensure peace in their vast labour colony.

With his own safety and popularity ensured by the rulers he felt brave enough to condemn all the Hindu warriors of the past and the brave Hindu patriots, calling Shivaji and Guru Gobind Singhji “misguided patriots”. What could please the please the MUSLIMS and the EUROPEANS more?

It is directly due to “Bapu” Gandhi that the Punjab Lion is dead and the Bengal Tiger is in cage. From Lok Sabha in Delhi to the State Assemblies in Kerala and Tamil Nadu we see only “GOAT” Gandhi’s statues, followers, institutions, schools, roads, localities and towns named after him, all the time throwing ice cold water on the warm blooded onlookers and any sign of “Shakti” and “Gaurav” as Hindus.

Ideologically and politically, the whole of Gandhian Bharat is a treeless flat land with signs posted on frontiers on all sides,

“COME IN. PLUNDER AND CONVERT FREELY.”

That is what the foreigners are doing- from Italy to Bangladesh.

For a government that wishes to drive the people like a herd of cattle a super hero figure like Gandhi is the ideal psychological tool. And logically this is the tool the ruling and fooling establishment are using vigorously, rigorously and non stop, since 1947. The Hindu nation once dominant from Afghanistan to Malaysia is like a flock of submissive sheep today, with the key of the abattoir in the hand of Italian born Sonia Maino-Gandhi. She has yet to see a ram among the one billion ewes standing up, to show her the sign, “QUIT INDIA!” Many Gandhian ewes are busy at work at Bollywood, pleasing all the KHANS in the absence of a Hindu hero.

Gandhi’s Hindu nation imagines like the man himself, being continuously kicked and stoned from all sides. That has led to the cocoon mentality of today when the Indians being expelled from Uganda or beaten up in Fiji or the Buddhist temples being burnt down in Bangladesh cause no ripple in the unconscious Hindu body in Bharat. Even the occupation of North Kashmir was not able to bring about a fierce reaction to liberate the territory.

India that remains deep frozen in the crippling Gandhian jelly of tolerance and appeasement is now bleeding profusely. We see sharp and long daggers of corruption, bureaucracy and minority-ism being thrust into every pour of her skin. Soon she will violently IMPLODE with foreseeable loss of life and property. Only a post revolution new Bharat in even smaller area than now, will emerge as Hindusthan with the guts to declare itself “HINDU RASHTRA” after shedding her gangrene infested peripheries.

—————————-

Defeated, disgraced and dishonourable leader

Any devotee of M K GANDHI, the emaciated Weakling who discouraged manliness and demoralised the nation into unconditional surrender and died an ignominious death at the hands of a patriot, must be either brainwashed, bullied or downright stupid (be-waqoof) to call the man “freedom fighter”.

What was the freedom of Delhi if Lahore, Karachi, Quetta, Peshawar and Dhaka were betrayed into slavery? Were they not integral to India like Mumbai, Kanpur and Chennai? Do we see a woman happy whose daughter is abducted and son killed by bandits? Yet Gandhi’s India doesn’t even mention the word “Partition” nor the cancer (MUSLIMS) that killed Akhand Bharat! Instead of confronting the enemy with courage he went on the worst ever misleading suicidal mission by chanting “Hindu-Muslim Bhai Bhai!”

Hundreds of millions of Hindus, worshipping Gandhi, are still stuck to the same suicidal mentality like brain dead zombies. The nation has lost vigour and independence. Our own great religious and spiritual heritage, culture and traditions have been suppressed or subordinated to those from the Middle East. Gandhi never looked at the ruins of those great temples in Ayodhya, Mathura, Varanasi and Somnath, mortally fearing those who look towards Mecca while praying, and call themselves descendants of Babur and Aurangzeb and are quick with dagger and sword.

Thinkers call it cognitive seizure of the great Hindu nation, still being misled, misruled and robbed by the Italians. Others regard it self-negation. Some have identified it as a secret wish for collective death due to centuries long slavery and degradation resulting in genetic deterioration and deeply embedded inferiority complex. Despite 65 years since Partition the pacified supine Hindu nation is still giving rides to the corrupt “Hindu bashing” rulers and foreign oriented descendants of previous invaders and tyrants who are circulating as venom and cancer in the arteries of the nation.

No other nation on earth has the counterpart of our Gandhi who is seen as the sleep inducing agent for the dying patient who is unable to open his eyes or move his hands. We have become incapable of imagining as to what our Hindusthan would have been like today had we replaced Gandhian slavish appeasing mentality with the vigour, dynamism, pride and dignity of Shivaji, Guru Gobind Singhji and Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose on 15 August 1947, the day of eternal defeat, shame and surrenders. Today, due to ‘Gandhi induced’ disability and invalidity the orphaned Hindu nation, including the Supreme Commander and the Prime Minister, is so demoralised, lacking self-confidence and unity, that our Bharat is looking up to a nondescript imported Italian born female of unknown pedigree, mental orientation, core loyalties and background, to guide the vast country of one billion inhabitants from Kashmir to Kerala. The country’s Parliament, President, Prime Minister and the top General begin their day after paying homage to her ancestors and swearing loyalty to her. Is there any other country on earth so low down and flat, being trampled upon, exploited and misled by a FOREIGN finger, like our Hindusthan? Only the brave Hindus who have escaped the “Gandhian cage” can go abroad and see the pride and patriotism of even tiny countries like Denmark, Austria and Lithuania to compare with our own.

Gandhi surrendered everything even before the battle for Hindusthan had begun and instantly went silent (“died”) when his Hindusthan (“Akhand Bharat”) was attacked, hacked and bled to death by the so-called “indigenous” Muslims, and Lahore and Dhaka disappeared from the map of India overnight.

The enemy of Gandhi and his India, the former President of All-India Congress Party, Mohammed Ali Jinnah, demanded a separate country for the INDIAN Muslims and threatened civil war. He prevailed. Gandhi was “demolished” but survived to live in shame.

EVIL TRIUMPHED OVER GOOD. Gandhi was the cause of the triumph of Evil in India.

“Bapu” Gandhi, whose statues stand across Partitioned India, reminds all the world of the Hindus’ collective cowardice and love of slavery. He watched in horror, listened in terror, and fell flat on his nose without even whispering, “I charge you, Brother JINN, with High Treason.”

Jinn had already exposed his Islamic sword, to frighten Gandhi, and his loyalty towards his own land of birth. JINN was born an Indian, died a Pakistani. He found Gandhi detestable, repugnant, loathsome and repulsive and thought the same of his Hindusthan, too. He couldn’t wait to take his Pakistan out of India and live away from Gandhi.

Like a docile and tame Hindu Gandhi became “secular” in order to escape being abused, beaten up or boiled & roasted alive (Hindus’ fate in earlier centuries). Lacking conviction & pride (“Gaurav”) in his own Hindu religion he did not admonish his own son, Hira Lal, **who rejected Sri Krishna and the Hindu religion, and embraced Mohammed & Islam with big love.

Mohandas Karamchand GANDHI is called the “FATHER” OF PAKISTAN”. His cowardice and frequent “fasts unto death” had created a dangerous political VACUUM in India that sucked in (INVITED) Islamic aggression so easily.

Would Jinnah have dared to utter the obscene word “Pakistan” had he seen Churchill or Shivaji, even Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, facing him, instead?

It was an oft repeated sentence that was heard all over India before Partition, “Jinnah, the “rat”, has become a “cat”, going for the “mouse” called Gandhi, for his meal.”

Today the entire Lok Sabha of Hindusthan, beholden to MK Gandhi, are also behaving like “rats” before yet another “Cat” called SONIA from Italy, making FOOLS of themselves. The new Cat in Bharat has become fat on the wealth of Hindusthan being deposited in foreign banks. Aggrieved & offended, the sulking followers of Gandhi are only capable of doing “Satyagraha” and hoping that Sonia Maino-Gandhi will vanish one day due to natural death.

What sense are “Ahimsa Parmo Dharma” and “Peace at all costs” of MK Gandhi when earlier we had the shining examples of SRI RAM fighting bravely in Sri Lanka, SRI KRISHNA encouraging Arjuna to fight in battle, BANDA SINGH BAHADUR sacking Sarhind to teach the savage ‘killers of infants’ a lesson, GENERAL HARI SINGH NALWA capturing Khyber Pass after defeating the Afghans, SHIVAJI “despatching” Rascal AFZAL KHAN, RANI OF JHANSI distinguishing herself in battles, MAHARANA PRATAP fighting for Hindu sovereignty, and countless other Hindus who FOUGHT against submission, slavery and dishonour but did not sit in “Satyagrahas” till the Muslims were “tamed” and the British had gone, leaving Jawaharlal NEHRU in tears over their departure.

Recalling the speed at which Gandhi forgot the slogan, “AKHAND BHARAT: AMAR RAHE!” but took up the chant of “HINDU MUSLIM BHAI BHAI!” puts him in the category of rats rather than lions. To earn the title of “LION” he had to speak like Winston Churchill, “FIGHT the separatist DEVILS till the end, and DEFEND our MOTHERLAND and SECULARISM to the last.”

Today the powerful ruling establishment in PARTITIONED India, who have vested interests in fooling the Hindus and destroying the country while robbing the natives with both hands, are still busy boosting the Gandhi image, calling him “MAHATMA” while denying the TRUTH that instead of Independence he got us PARTITION and two million DEAD and 15 million REFUGEES.

It took more than a few days to slaughter and wipe out all the Hindus and Sikhs in Pakistan at Partition. What warning or threat did GANDHI deliver to the KILLERS in PAKISTAN to stop the massacres and ensure the safety of the helpless MINORITY there? Did he send the betrayed and besieged HINDUS any support, reinforcements, arms and weapons to defend themselves? Sadly, it was not done even in KASHMIR when it was invaded within days of Partition. Gandhi openly BETRAYED the Hindus and saw them being killed, raped and driven out of their homes, but never mentioned “Exchange of Population”, and never issued any warning to the enemy. He did not realize what the fleeing Hindu refugees expected of him as the top leader of Hindusthan. He was scared and terrified himself. We saw him like a dry leaf that is lifted up high, and tossed about, by the gale force (political) wind in a violent storm.

The man was totally clueless about history, all the countless foreign invasions and the centuries of slavery and, by now, the presence of strongly motivated, united and HOSTILE foreign fifth columns that were deeply entrenched in our soil, who could “eat up” his AKHAND Bharat within days.

ON THE DAY THAT INDIA WAS MUTILATED AND MILLIONS WERE FLEEEING ACROSS THE BORDER, BOTH GANDHI AND NEHRU OUGHT TO HAVE BEEN LYNCHED, MUSSOLINI STYLE, OR SHOT DEAD. Partitioned India, still burdened with the separatist, intolerant and violent Muslims, had NO use of them.

Hindu LEADERS must muster guts even to think if action is still beyond their imagination.

GANDHI’ S legacy is FRONTIER AT WAGAH, NOT AT KHYBER.

HIS legacy is PAKISTAN, not “AKHAND” Bharat.

HIS bequest is the LIMBLESS, WINGLESS GUTLESS SECULAR BHARAT THAT IS ASHAMED TO SEE THE WORD “HINDU” IN CONSTITUTION.

HIS legacy is EXTERMINATION OF HINDUS in EAST BENGAL, NORTH KASHMIR and WEST PUNJAB but SWELLING NUMBERS of MUSLIM IMMIGRANTS and INFILTRATORS in BHARAT.

Who will now save the “REST OF INDIA” from the “KAFIR KILLER DEVILS”, given that the Hindu leaders are as confused, demoralised and docile now in 2012 as they were then in 1947, and worst of all, admire and adore GANDHI but not any hero who wielded sword in battle-field.

Hindu LEADERS like GANDHI cut a sorry figure when AKHAND BHARAT was bleeding and DYING..

They could not prevent the break up of Bharat in 1947.

They could not expel all the treacherous Muslims after Partition in 1947.

They could not ensure the safety of the Hindus in Srinagar, Kashmir.

They could not rally round the SRI RAM TEMPLE, the holiest shrine in Bharat, in order to construct it to its original grandeur and glory to attract tourists and pilgrims from the world.

They could not defend Sri NANKANA SAHIB, the birth place of Guru Nanak Dev that lies in Pakistan.

They cannot even shout, “QUIT INDIA!” at Sonia Maino, the Italian born “First Lady” of Bapu Gandhi’s Hindusthan.

They are watching the INFILTRATION of Muslims from the East and the West passively.

They are watching the ONE-WAY TRAFFIC of naïve Hindu girls converting to Islam on marrying a “MOHAMMED”.

They cannot even secure grants and subsidies for HINDU pilgrims that are given to the Muslims for Hajj.

Not one has dared to shout, “WHAT ARE THE MUSLIMS DOING IN BROKEN BHARAT AFTER PARTITION?”.

Not one has cried, “MK GANDHI’S VERSION OF SECULARISM IN DELHI AND AMRITSAR IS LIKE “COW DUNG” FOR US IF IT IS NOT VALID IN LAHORE AND DHAKA.”

Not one has declared AUGUST 15 the “DAY OF MOURNING” to lament the historic defeat of India in 1947 when she escaped the “MOGUL RULE” only after surrendering one third of surface area of India to the enemy.

Not one has stood up for a HINDU HOLOCAUST MUSEUM in Delhi and Kolkata to remind the people of the world of the barbarities and cruelties, massacres, abductions, rape and the Jezia tax during the ISLAMIC rule over India.

None has yet demanded a free discussion over the absurd, illegal, illogical and non democratic (without Referendum) Partition. Are the slaves blind or timid “rats” not to wish to go to Israel and see the Holocaust Museum in Jerusalem, the one in Prague, the one in in Vilnius and the one in Washington DC?

Given such disgusting REALITY, only a FOOL will say, “OUR COUNTRY’S FRONTIRS AND GRANDCHILDREN ARE SAFE IN GANDHI’S HINDUSTHAN.”

On the birth anniversary of the uninspiring demolished and cowardly MK Gandhi, who was forced to go naked, who was soundly defeated and humiliated by his friend Barrister JINN to force Partition of India in 1947, we can only mourn the fact that his followers still call him “Mahatma”!

==================

**

Ram Gopal`s Diary

Hiralal Gandhi In Kanpur

�Yaadon ke Jharokhe se� (Through the Windows of Memory)

Shivnath Sharma, Page 28-29

(Translated from original Hindi.)

This incident dates back to 1936-37 when I was a student in Kanpur’s DAV college and was preparing for the law examination. I used to live in the college hostel.

Inter-community relations in Kanpur of those times had reached their nadir. People still had fresh in their minds the memories of the big Hindu-Muslim riots. The embers of communal hatred were being fanned by the so-called �community leaders� on both sides.

On one side there was this Maulana Bukhari, fond of giving long speeches, thoroughly quenched in communal venom. People of a certain community used to regularly attend his meetings and encourage him at intervals by shouting incendiary slogans. Typically, these meetings concluded with the bringing of a few persons, purportedly Hindus, on the podium, wishing to embrace Islam. They were made to recite the Kalama (affirmation of faith, required of those embracing Islam), and were thus ceremonially inducted into the ranks of the believers.

Often times, Hindus too used to convene retaliatory meetings, which were equally inciting.

Not only did the authorities make absolutely no effort to curb such gatherings, but in actuality they tacitly encouraged them. The reasons were clear. The independence movement was in full swing, and the calculated policy of the government was to weaken it by keeping Muslims and Hindus in a perpetual state of warfare.

Just about that time Mahatma Gandhi’s son Hiralal Gandhi was making news. Whether it was because of his illustrious father’s indifference towards him, or any other reason, he had fallen into the abyss of degradation. He had become addicted to alcohol and women. His moral character had plummeted to the gutter level. Some Muslim fanatics saw their opportunity to slander the Mahatma, fanned the fires in the son by assisting him in his evil desires. A a prelude, he was coaxed into Islam and given a new name: Abdullah Gandhi. Then he was made a show-piece at Muslim gatherings all over India. Wherever he was exhibited, the Muslim slogan used to be : �Today the son has known the true religion of Islam, tomorrow we shall make Gandhi (M.K.) recite the Kalama.�

How could Kanpur be immune to this malady? As expected, with great fanfare Abdullah Gandhi, alias Hiralal was brought to Kanpur and was show-cased in a mammoth meeting. The same slogans- “The Son Today, the Father Tomorrow” were repeated. Then in accordance with the usual routine of previous meetings, some imposters and hired characters posing as Hindus took the Islamic oath, and were ceremonially inducted into Islam. The meeting then formed into a procession. I had the chance to watch this procession with a few of my friends from a close angle.

The procession was fairly big, and passed raucously through the important thoroughfares of the city, shouting inflammatory slogans. The centerpiece was, of course, Abdullah Gandhi sitting in an open ‘Buggy’ (horse drawn carriage). On either side of him was a man holding him for support because he was heavily drunk. He was wearing a pair of loose pyjamas, black ‘sherwani’ topped by a Sheikh Abdullah style fur cap. His eyes were bloodshot, and he was swinging under the influence. When the procession passed through Moolganj (the red-light district of Kanpur) the scene became hilarious. On both sides of the road, on the balconies and rooftops, the prostitutes turned out to watch the spectacle. Our ‘hero’ Abdullah Gandhi bowing to them, was sending his ‘Salaams’ through the air, which were profusely reciprocated to by the ladies of the night. At one spot, while doing his Salaams, Abdullah lost his balance and rolled to the floor of the carriage. His facilitators somehow lifted him up and put him back in his seat.

Needless to say, my heart filled with grief and indignation over the tragic fall of a great man’s offspring.

==========

Another comment on Gandhi by a patriot:

MAHATAMA GANDHI and JAVAHAR LAAL NAHARU are responsible for the creation of PAAKISTHAAN because of this we HINDUUS and COMING GENERATIONS of every Hinduu are going to suffer for ever ——– before we were suffering because of white Christian British rule now we are suffering because of Catholic Christian SONIA + BROWN INDIAN CHRISTIANS + ANTI HINDUUS EDUCATED IN CONVENT SCHOOLS OF MACAULAY EDUCATION SYSTEM + MUSLIM rule of all together over the defeated, disunited and disoriented Hindus.

=============

CONCLUSION

An honourable leader would have committed suicide out of shame or sense of honour on “leading” the country to defeat & disaster of such horrendous magnitude and strategic defence implications like Partition. Gandhi was not that sort of a leader. A young Maratha patriot had to teach him the responsibilities of a true leader.

Gandhi will also be CURSED by those tens of millions of Hindus who believed in his assurances to stay put in Pakistan but not to escape with their lives in good time despite the approaching black clouds of despotic Islamic rule overhead. In the event most of them were hacked to death or burnt alive.

How long will the curse of Gandhi’s residual national paralysis and cowardice last? As long as a semi literate non-Hindu Italian born female of unknown pedigree and background is seen guiding and advising the “poodle” Prime Minister and Parliament of Hindusthan, AND THE GALLANT ARMY GOES ON WATCHING.

============

Kuru

www.partitionofindia.com

__._,_.___

 

How ‘Religious Defamation’ Laws Would Ban Islam

How ‘Religious Defamation’ Laws Would Ban Islam

Written by Raymond Ibrahim   

Wednesday, 26 September 2012

(Note – Insert in italics are byskanda987.)

Front Page Magazine
http://www.copts.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4124&Itemid=1

If films and cartoons defame Islam, the Quran itself defames other religions.

 

As the Islamic world, in the guise of the 57-member state Organization of Islamic Cooperation, continues to push for the enforcement of “religious defamation” laws in the international arena—theoretically developed to protect all religions from insult, but in reality made for Islam—one great irony is lost, especially on Muslims: if such laws would ban movies and cartoons that defame Islam, they would also, by logical extension, have to ban the religion of Islam itself—the only religion whose core texts actively defame other religions.

(There is already a valid reason why Islam can be declared illegal in any kafir country. The reason is – Islam does not approve any democratic government. Islam only accepts Sharia law and constitution. There is no separation of church and state in Islam.  Therefore, the kafirs need to unite and with grass root democratic action ammend the constitution declaring Islam illegal. – Skanda987)

To understand this, consider what “defamation” means. Typical dictionary-definitions include “to blacken another’s reputation” and “false or unjustified injury of the good reputation of another, as by slander or libel.” In Muslim usage, defamation simply means anything that insults or offends Islamic sensibilities.

 

However, to gain traction among the international community, the OIC maintains that such laws should protect all religions from defamation, not just Islam. Accordingly, the OIC is agreeing that any expression that “slanders” the religious sentiments of others should be banned.

What, then, do we do with Islam’s core religious texts—beginning with the Quran itself, which slanders, denigrates and blackens the reputation of other religions? Consider Christianity alone: Quran 5:73 declares that “Infidels are they who say Allah is one of three,” a reference to the Christian Trinity; Quran 5:73 says “Infidels are they who say Allah is the Christ, [Jesus] son of Mary”; and Quran 9:30 complains that “the Christians say the Christ is the son of Allah … may Allah’s curse be upon them!”

 

Considering that the word “infidel” (or kafir) is one of Islam’s most derogatory terms, what if a Christian book or Western movie appeared declaring that “Infidels are they who say Muhammad is the prophet of God—may God’s curse be upon them”? If Muslims would consider that a great defamation against Islam—and they would, with the attendant rioting, murders, etc.—then by the same standard it must be admitted that the Quran defames Christians and Christianity.

 

Similarly, consider how the Christian Cross, venerated among millions, is depicted—is defamed—in Islam: according to canonical hadiths, when he returns, Jesus supposedly will destroy all crosses; and Muhammad, who never allowed the cross in his presence, ordered someone wearing a cross to “take off that piece of idolatry.”

 

What if Christian books or Western movies declared that the sacred things of Islam—say the Black Stone in the Ka’ba of Mecca—are “idolatry” and that Muhammad himself will return and destroy them? If Muslims would consider that defamation against Islam—and they would, with all the attendant rioting, murders, etc.—then by the same standard it must be admitted that the hadith defames the Christian Cross.

 

Here is a particularly odious form of defamation against Christian sentiment, especially to the millions of Catholic and Orthodox Christians. According to Islam’s most authoritative Quranic exegetes, including the revered Ibn Kathir, Muhammad is in paradise married to and having sex with the Virgin Mary.

 

What if a Christian book or Western movie portrayed, say, Muhammad’s wife, Aisha the “Mother of Believers,” as being married to and having sex with a false prophet in heaven? If Muslims would consider that a great defamation against Islam—and they would, with all the attendant rioting, murders, etc.—then by the same standard it must be admitted that Islam’s most authoritative Quranic exegetes defame the Virgin Mary.

 

Nor does such defamation of Christianity occur in Islam’s ancient texts only; modern day Muslim scholars and sheikhs agree that it is permissible to defame Christianity. Qatar-based “Islam Web” even issued a fatwa that legitimizes insulting Christianity.

 

Now consider the wording used by Muslim leaders calling on the U.N. to enforce religious defamation laws in response to the Muhammad film on YouTube, and how these expressions can easily be used against Islam:

 

The OIC “deplored… an offensive and derogatory film on the life of Prophet Muhammad” and “called on the producers to show respect to the religious sentiments held sacred by Muslims and those of other faiths.”

 

But what about the “offensive and derogatory” depictions of Christianity in Islam’s core texts? Are Muslims willing to expunge these from the Quran and hadith, “to show respect to the religious sentiments held sacred … by those of other faiths,” in this case, Christians?

 

Turkish Prime Minister Erodgan said the film “insults religions” (note the inclusive plural) and called for “international legal regulations against attacks on what people [not just Muslims] deem sacred.”

 

Well, what about the fact that Islam “insults religions”—including Judaism and all polytheistic faiths? Should the West call for “international legal regulations against attacks on what people deem sacred,” in the case of Christianity, regulations against Islam’s teachings which attack the sanctity of Christ’s divinity, the Cross, and Virgin Mary?

 

Even Saudi Arabia’s Grand Mufti—who a few months ago called for the destruction of all Christian churches in the Arabian Peninsula (first reported here)—is calling for a “global ban on insults targeting all” religious figures, while the Grand Imam of Egypt’s Al Azhar is calling for “a U.N. resolution outlawing ‘insulting symbols and sanctities of Islam’ and other religions.” Again, they, too, claim to be interested in banning insults to all religions, while ignoring the fact that their own religion is built atop insulting all other religions.

 

And surely this is the grandest irony of all: the “defamation” that Muslims complain about—and that prompts great violence and bloodshed  around the world—revolves around things like movies and cartoons, which are made by individuals who represent only themselves; on the other hand, Islam itself, through its holiest and most authoritative texts, denigrates and condemns—in a word, defames—all other religions, not to mention calls for violence against them (e.g., Quran 9:29).

 

It is this issue, Islam’s perceived “divine” right to defame and destroy, that the international community should be addressing—not silly cartoons and films.

 

A Rational Study of Radical Islam, by Dr. Bill Warner

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Barbara Paolucci <>

(Do you) Think you know all you need to know about Islam/Muslims/Jihad? – I did.  You don’t and neither did I.

Watch the 2 videos and pay close attention while you watch.

A Rational Study of Radical Islam, by Dr. Bill Warner

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9sYgqRtZGg&feature=relmfu

 

Why We Are Afraid, A 1400 Year Secret, by Dr Bill Warner

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_Qpy0mXg8Y