ॐ Hinduu Nation ॐ

From the heart of a Muslim

 

From: devindersingh < >

(Note – The inserts in italics are by Skanda987)

Soon after Partition, Pakistani leaders realised that religious and political Islam would not transform into constitutional Islam that could accommodate all faiths and peoples. The Objectives Resolution passed by the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan in 1949, declared that `sovereignty belongs to Allah’ (not to the people) and the state should enable the Muslims to order their lives in accordance with Islam.

A study by Aparna Pande, a scholar at the well-known Hudson Institute, in the US, says that this very objective “gave rise to a central question that has bedeviled Pakistan ever since its creation: If Islam is to be the basis of the state, whose Islam will be followed and how?” Whose Islam? Are there many, diverse, Islams? Yes.

The report of the judicial commission (1954) headed by Pakistan’s Chief Justice Munir to inquire into the large-scale violence against the Ahmedia sect put the issue `whose Islam’ pithily thus:

– no two of the several Ulamas are `agreed on’ what is Islam;

– a person who is a Muslim under the definition given by one Ulama, will be kafir according to every other Ulama; and

– no new definition is possible as any definition that `differs from that given by all others’ will be `out of the fold of Islam’.

QED: Islam prescribes One God, but there is no One Islam.

In their blind anti-Hindu rage, Muslims of undivided India created Islamic Pakistan which, they now find they cannot keep up nor give up. After Partition, Pakistan’s diverse inhabitants had no `common identity that might bind them together’ and Pakistan has `struggled with this lack of a common identity and principle ever since’, says the Hudson study.

Hans Morgenthau, a leading 20th century scholar on international politics, said prophetically in 1956 itself:

“Pakistan is not a nation and hardly a state, with no justification in history, ethnic origin, language, civilisation, or the consciousness of its population…it is hard to see how anything but a miracle…will assure Pakistan’s future.”

The dilemma of Pakistan is brilliantly captured by a Pakistani scholar, Waheed-uz-Zaman, in 1973:

“If we let go the ideology of Islam, we cannot hold together as a nation by any other means…. If the Arabs, the Turks, the Iranians, god forbid, give up Islam, the Arabs yet remain Arabs, the Turks remain Turks, the Iranians remain Iranians, but what do we remain if we give up Islam?”

Authentic translations of Koran and Hadith, the Books of Islam, are available in English and other languages. The printing press, internet, and cell phones allow us to spread the messages of Koran or any other Book. No need to rely on mullahs to evaluate what Islam is.

Based o the quotes I have read and collected at https://skanda987.wordpress.com/category/islam/

I clearly see that Islam in almost any form or sect is not tolerant of any other faith in the world. Islam teaches follower to not rest till the whole world’s land and lives are under Islam and sharia. There is no ‘separation of church and state (SCS)’ (religion and politics or social lives) in Islam. The 1400 years of history of Islam supports this view strongly. The history shows that wherever Islam invades or enters, there is no peace.

Islam has spread mostly by invasions and forcible conversions, and by producing children with four wives like pigs and forcing Islam on the children. Islam does not approve a democratic government. For this reason all the non-Muslim countries need to declare Islam illegal.

The creation of Pakistan is in accordance of the agenda of Islam and the foolishness of the Hindu politicians of the time 1947 in Bhaarat. Since 1000 years the Hindus have been thinking that they can assimilate Muslims as they did Parsis or Jews in Bhaarat, the Vedic land. While Gandhi did not read Koran, and assumed Islam is a god religion, Jinnah clearly said in 1947 that Islam is not compatible with the Hindu dharma, and asked for a separate Muslim state. This (that the Islam is barbaric and not tolerant) becomes very clear when you read Koran and Bhagavad Gita that is well known as the Book of Hindu (Vedic) dharma.

The Vedic dharma is universal religion for mankind, and is tolerant of all the tolerant faiths. Forgetting that, the Hindus foolishly have kept tolerating the intolerant and forcibly invaded religion Islam. This is a cause of the creation of Pakistan.

So, if the Hindus do not wake up now and make Bhaarat a Vedic state (not a ‘secular” one), then the Vedic dharma and sanskriti are doomed. We the Vedics valued the Vedic heritage since millenniums, and have carried forward this precious heritage for mankind till now; and it can vanish from its cradle (Bhaarat) and the world just in 50-100 years if we do not make Bhaarat a Vedic state. It can vanhsi because the anti-Vedic forces are brutal, organized, and well funded and named. To counter, we need to unite, organize, and put our money and efforts to save dharma. It is called dharma because it is universal religion for mankind.

Jai sri Krishna! – Skanda987)

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/strategic-geopolitical-issues/201538-pakistan-s-existential-crisis.html#ixzz25rcA4as2

 

From: balayogi venkataraman < >

OUTSTANDING U.S. HISTORIAN CALLS BRITISH RULE IN INDIA GREATEST CRIME IN ALL HISTORY

I was a school boy in Karachi when I first heard the name of Katherine Mayo, notorious author of a viciously anti-India book, titled Mother India. Mahatma Gandhi had condemned the book as a “gutter inspector’s report”!

Mayo was an American journalist who wrote this book around 1927, stoutly defending British Rule in India. She also vehemently attacked Hindu society, religion and culture.

About the same time, I heard of two other American authors who had written almost as passionately in favour of India and against the Britishers. The first of these, Will Durant, had the reputation of being one of the world’s greatest historians, and philosophers. The other was a Church leader, Rev. Jabez Thomas Sunderland.

Will Durant’s life time achievement is his eleven volume series “The Story of Civilisation” a monumental set of volumes written in collaboration with his wife Ariel. Will and Ariel were awarded the Pulitzer Prize for General Non-fiction in 1968.

Will Durant’s other largely popular work, The Story of Philosophy, brought philosophy to the lay person.

On his first visit to India in 1896, Sunderland met Justice Mahadev Govind Ranade and Bengali Nationalist Surendra Nath Bannerji. He was the first American to attend an annual session of the Indian National Congress.

I recall reading around 1945 a very powerful book of his, India in Bondage. Gandhiji and Rabindra Nath Tagore wrote to him letters of gratitude. The book was banned in India by the British Government.

Not many may be aware that when the British came to India in the eighteenth century this country was politically weak but economically very wealthy.

This wealth, wrote Sunderland in the above book, was created by the Hindus’ vast and varied industries.

“India was a far greater industrial and manufacturing nation than any in Europe or than any other in Asia.  Her textile goods – the fine products of her looms, in cotton, wool, linen and silk – were famous over the civilized world; so were her exquisite jewelry and her precious stones cut in every lovely form; so were her pottery, porcelains, ceramics of every kind, quality, color and beautiful shape; so were her fine works in metal – iron, steel, silver and good.  She had great architecture – equal in beauty to any in the world. She had great engineering works. She had great merchants, great businessmen, great bankers and financiers. Not only was she the greatest ship-building nation, but she had great commerce and trade by land and sea which extended to all known civilized countries. Such was the India which the British found when they came.

 

**

 

I have, however, come upon lately a short book written by William Durant in 1930 titled “The Case for India”, but which had been out of print for many decades. Strand Book Stall of Mumbai and its Founder T.N. Shanbagh have done signal service to history by procuring a photo copy of Durant’s book from Mohandas Pai of Infosys and having it republished in 2007.

 

In his introductory note to his “The Case for India”, Durant writes:

 

“I went to India to help myself visualize a people whose cultural history I had been studying for The Story of Civilisation…

“But I saw such things in India as made me feel that study and writing were frivolous things in the presence of a people-one-fifth of the human race – suffering poverty and oppression bitterer than any to be found elsewhere on the earth. I was horrified. I had not thought it possible that any government could allow its subjects to sink to such misery.

“I came away resolved to study living India as well as the India with the brilliant past; to learn more of this unique Revolution that fought with suffering accepted but never returned; to read the Gandhi of today as well as the Buddha of long ago. And the more I read the more I was filled with astonishment and indignation at the apparently conscious and deliberate bleeding of India by England throughout a hundred and fifty years. I began to feel that I had come upon the greatest crime in all history.” (Emphasis added)

Durant refers extensively to Sunderland’s writings and says that “those who have seen the unspeakable poverty and physiological weakness of the Hindus today will hardly believe that it was the wealth of eighteenth century India which attracted the commercial pirates of England and France”.

 

It was this wealth that the East India Company proposed to appropriate, Durant says.  Already in 1686 the East India Company’s Directors declared their intention to “establish …a large, well-grounded, sure English dominion in India for all time to come”.

 

 

 

In 1757, Robert Clive defeated the Rajah of Bengal at Plassey and declared his Company the owner of the richest province in India. Durant adds: Clive added further territory by forging and violating treaties, by playing one native prince against another, and by generous bribes given and received. Four million dollars were sent down the river to Calcutta in one shipment. He accepted “presents” amounting to $ 1,170,000 from Hindu rulers dependent upon his favour and his guns; pocketed from them, in addition, an annual tribute of $ 140,000; took to opium, was investigated and exonerated by Parliament, and killed himself.  “When I think”, he said, “of the marvelous riches of that country, and the comparatively small part which I took away, I am astonished at my own moderation”. Such were the morals of the men who proposed to bring civilization to India.

 

India-analysts often talk very disparagingly about India’s caste-system. Will Durant, however, used the casteist metaphor to substantiate his condemnation of British dominion over India as the greatest crime in all history.

 

Under sub-heading “The Caste System in India” Durant writes :

 

“The present caste system in India consists of four classes: the real Brahmans i.e. the British bureaucracy; the real Kshatriyas i.e. the British army; the real Vaisyas i.e. the British traders; and the real Sudras and Untouchables i.e. the Hindu people.”

 

After dealing with the first three castes the author writes:

 

“The final element in the real caste system of India is the social treatment of the Hindus by the British. The latter may be genial Englishmen when they arrive, gentlemen famous as lovers of fair play; but they are soon turned, by the example of their leaders and the poison of irresponsible power, into the most arrogant and over-bearing bureaucracy on earth. “Nothing can be more striking,” said a report to Parliament, in 1830, “than the scorn with which the people have been practically treated at the hands of even those who were actuated by the most benevolent motives”. Sunderland reports that the British treat the Hindus as strangers and foreigners in India, in a manner “quite as unsympathetic, harsh and abusive as was ever seen among the Georgia and Louisiana planters in the old days of American slavery”.

 

Durant then quotes Gandhiji saying that the foreign system under which India was governed had reduced Indians to “pauperism and emasculation”.

 

Durant comments “As early as 1783 Edmund Burke predicted that the annual drain of Indian resources to England without equivalent return would eventually destroy India. From Plassey to Waterloo, fifty-seven years, the drain of India’s wealth to England is computed by Brooks Adams at two-and-a-half to five billion dollars. Macaulay suggested long ago, that it was this stolen wealth from India which supplied England with free capital for the development of mechanical inventions, and so made possible the Industrial Revolution.”

 

Will Durant wrote his book “The case for India” in 1930. When some time later the book was noticed by Rabindranath Tagore, he wrote an article in the Modern Review of March, 1931 warmly complimenting Will Durant, and Tagore observed: “I was surprised when I noticed in Will Durant’s book a poignant note of pain at the suffering and indignity of the people who are not his kindred. I know that the author will have a small chance of reward in popularity from his readers and his book may even run the risk of being proscribed to us, not having the indecency to deal with an unwholesome calumny against the people who are already humiliated by their own evil fortune. But he, I am sure, has his noble compensation in upholding the best tradition of the West in its championship of freedom and fair play.”

 

TAILPIECE

 

William Durant and Ariel Durant shared a love story as remarkable as their scholarship. In October, 1981, William fell ill, and was taken to the hospital. After he was hospitalized, Ariel stopped eating. On October 25, she died. When William learnt that Ariel had died, he passed away on November 7.

 

L.K. Advani

 

New Delhi

 

15 July, 2012

 

From: <MoorthyM@comcast.net>

I thought in this poignant moment of the exodus of beleaguered NE Indians from the Indian (read, Hindu) heartland, the following poem captures the moment so appropriately.

First they came for Punjabi / Sindhi / Bangladeshi non-Muslims

But I did not speak out,
Because I was not a Punjabi / Sindhi / Bangladeshi non-Muslim

Then they came for the Kashmiri non-Muslims
And I did not speak out,
Because I was not a Kashmiri non-Muslim

Then they came for the Jammu / Ladakhi non-Muslims
And I did not speak out,
Because I was not a Jammu / Ladakhi non-Muslim

Then they came for the Assamese non-Muslims
And I did not speak out,
Because I was not a Assamese non-Muslim

Then they came for the West Bengali non-Muslims
And I did not speak out,
Because I was not a West Bengali non-Muslim

Then they came for the Nepali non-Muslims
And I did not speak out,
Because I was not a Nepali non-Muslim

Then they came for me,
And there was no one left to speak out for me.

The poem can be found here: http://www.saveindia.com/poems.htm

It’s a pity, because we now know how radical Islam operates in India (and elsewhere). We know its weak points, and in my view, its powerbase in India can be neutralized within two years and the flock liberated within the next 10 years, permanently.

Far-reaching measures can be justified under the human rights umbrella that non-Muslims have the right to live safely in South Asia in light of the Islamic partitioning of 1947, and that can only be India. India has every right to liberate its certain minorities from genocidal and non-functioning ideologies and provide a future for them.

India will likely unravel quickly under the radical Islamic onslaught from within and without, if the armed forces of India do not recognize the limitations of the system of governing and that of its political leadership.

http://www.moorthymuthuswamy.com/

From: Deva Samaroo < >

True Face of Radical Islam

Ramadan: Islam’s ‘Holy Month’ of Christian Oppression and the True Face of Radical Islam: Can Muslims Truly Live Sincerely in Non-Muslim States

by Raymond Ibrahim
Investigative Project on Terrorism

The month of Ramadan, which ended earlier this week, proved to be a month of renewed Muslim piety on the one hand, and renewed oppression of non-Muslim minorities on the other. In Nigeria, for example, Islamic militants are living up to the assertion that “Ramadan is a month of jihad and death for Allah,” proving that killing Christians is not only reserved for Christian holidays—like Christmas and Easter, when militants bombed churches killing dozens—but is especially applicable during Islam’s Ramadan.

Usually, however, Ramadan-related oppression has to do with Muslim perceptions that Christians do not “know their place”—either because the latter openly do things forbidden to Muslims during Ramadan, or because they dare object to the things Muslims do during their holy month.
When it comes to these aspects of dhimmitude, Egypt offers countless examples, past and present, simply because it houses the Middle East’s largest Christian minority, the Copts, and thus offers more opportunities for the intolerant face of Ramadan to reveal itself. Two recent examples follow:
First, according to Coptic websites, on July 27, a diabetic man in Egypt was driving his car in Maadi, a suburb of southern Cairo, when he was struck with great thirst, “which he could not bear” (a side-effect of diabetes, further exacerbated by Egypt’s July weather). He pulled over by a public water source and started drinking water. Soon three passer-bys approached him, inquiring why he was drinking water (among the many things forbidden to Muslims during daylight in Ramadan). The diabetic man replied, “Because I am a Christian, and sick,” to which they exclaimed “you’re a Christian, too!” and begun beating him mercilessly. Other passer-bys began to congregate to see what was happening, but no one intervened on behalf of the diabetic non-Muslim, until he managed to make a dash for his parked car and fled the scene.

Though water is not forbidden to him, this infidel Christian openly violated a principle of Islamic Ramadan, which was deemed a great affront and punished accordingly. This idea that non-Muslims must show respect for Islamic observances is commonplace. Around the same time this story took place, a Christian Lebanese singer was taken to police while in Algeria for smoking in public, and “failing to show due respect to Muslims.” She was released after police warned her that “she was not allowed to smoke in public during Ramadan in Muslim Algeria, even though she was a Christian.”

The second story from Egypt concerns a young Christian doctor, Maher Rizkalla Ghali, who was shot by riotous Muslims, including easily-identified Salafis, resulting in the loss of one eye and the likely loss of the other. According to Watan Voice, the perpetrators live downstairs and regularly fired bullets in the air while feasting during sahur (the time before dawn when Muslims are permitted the things they are forbidden in daylight, including food, water, and sex). One night the raucous was so unbearable that the Copt spoke to them from his window, saying that their actions were disturbing to children and the elderly.

Their response was to “insult his religion” and open fire at him, severely disfiguring him. The Muslims then tried to break through the door to attack and plunder the Christian household. Although the family filed a police report, “security forces have not taken any action towards the perpetrators.” Likewise, though they tried to admit the blinded Christian man to several hospitals, they were refused admission until Kasr Hospital accepted them.

This story is almost identical to what happened to a family in Turkey around the same time. According to Hurriyet Daily News, the home of an Alevi family “was stoned and their stables burned down by an angry mob” because they “told a Ramadan drummer not to wake them for sahur, the meal before sunrise,” resulting in a quarrel. After local Muslims found out about the family’s temerity, “a mob of around 60 people” gathered around the house hurling stones, setting the stable on fire, and chanting Islamic slogans, including “Allahu Akbar!” “They came to lynch us,” explained a family member, and “told us to leave and threatened to kill us if we did not.”

The above anecdotes demonstrate the stark antithesis between the West and the Muslim world concerning the notion of being “sensitive” to religious minorities during the holidays of the dominant religion: whereas almost every year, stories appear of Christmas being suppressed to accommodate Muslim sensitivities in the West, in the Muslim world, Christians themselves are being suppressed to accommodate Muslim sensitivities. The question is asked can Muslims truly live sincerely in non-Muslim states without ulterior motives.

Raymond Ibrahim is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center and an Associate Fellow at the Middle East Forum.

From: Gaurang Vaishnav < >

Subject: If you do not want Bharat to Become another Pakistan, YOU must attend this Rally on September 2

Dear Friends:

Namaste. You must be aware of terror campaign by Muslim infiltrators from Bangladesh in Assam where 400,000 Bodo Hindus have been forced out of their homes. The terror campaign against Assamese Hindus has spread to the rest of the country where they have been forced to flee their homes in Mumbai, Pune, Bangalore, Hyderabad, etc. This shows the deep rooted network of the Jehadi forces in Bharat. What happened in Kashmir 20 years ago is now repeated in the Northeast.

 

Vishwa Hindu Parishad of America has joined with other patriotic organizations to hold a massive demonstration in front of the Bharatiya Consulate in New York on coming Sunday, September 2 to protest inaction and pro-Muslim policy of the Government of Bharat. Please see below an impassioned plea by one of the Hindu activists (edited for clarity).

 

The danger is so real that you must put aside all your other commitments, and attend this demonstration to save Bharat, save your kith and kin residing in Bharat from a horrible fate that awaits them, if we do not act NOW. Do not let our grand children ask, where were my grandparents when my ancestral land was being looted, raped and converted to Islam? Remember, there is strength in number.

 

Thank you, for your consideration and support.

 

Brotherly yours,

 

Gaurang G. Vaishnav

Central & Northern NJ Chapter

Vishwa Hindu Parishad of America

732-744-0851

 

==  APPEAL ==

 

India is a turmoil and the dangers are immense for Non-Muslim population.  Even Indian Muslims showed that their true allegiance is for Bangladeshi Muslims who carried knives, axes and spades and terrorized and burnt villages, displacing literally hundreds of thousands of Bodo Hindus.   First Kashmir, then all Northeast India and many mini-Pakistanis all around India, there seems little hope for non-Muslims of India.

What happened to police in state of Maharashtra where they banged heads of two cops until they died, cut their private parts and threw their bodies into fire, will happen in rest of the country in a few years, eventually to the rest of the population in just a few decades.   In Pakistan, they reduced the population of 25% non Muslims to less than 1%; they decimated most of non Muslim population by conversion and killing, mostly in three months.   Millions of women and girls committed suicide to escape mass scale rape;  men’s private parts were cut off and thousands of severed heads paraded on poles all around Pakistan.  Hindu and Sikh fathers killed their daughters with their own hands rather than see their daughters raped in front of them and killed.   We have got to face the Islamic terror head on or we are all doomed.  Jehadi Islam will eventually destroy the all humanity, both non-Muslims and Muslims.  What will happen if all of India becomes Islamic?  We cannot handle one Pakistan; just imagine what would happen if India becomes Islamic, which is a real possibility with many parts of India becoming mini Pakistans.

If Indians are not willing to oust and punish those politicians and their hand maidens like the purchased media who are allowing this to happen, they will face the same fate of those Hindus in Pakistan a few decades ago, of those in Bangladesh in last three decades and now those in Assam.    Ms. Sonia Gandhi and the Congress party have literally allowed Indians to become minced meat for the Jehadi terrorists without catching a single terrorist for sake of vote bank (see heart breaking links at the end).  Indian politicians enjoying Z level security costing millions of dollars at the expense of the wretched Indians have looted enough to run away to other countries, leaving hapless Indians to eventually become fodder for the Jehadi Islamists.

Please attend this program and show your solidarity.

See the result yourself.  350,000 Kashmiri were driven out 20+ years ago overnight and they are still living in camps.  As mini-Pakistan’s rise in India, this is the fate that is of non-Muslims.

350,000 Kashmiri Hindus in camps even after 25 years.

 

Future waiting for rest of India if this is not stopped.

 

Is there any country where their citizens are living as refugees in squalid camps raising generations of children?  Is this not what North East and eventually many parts of India going to be as Muslims population grows, not withstanding any “moderate Muslims”?   What is Indian Govt doing, supporting the very perpetrators who are doing this for vote banks.
Note:  Pics below are from Fact India Exhibitions on Kashmir; several were inaugurated by Sri Sri Ravi Shankar.  (You can find more at:

 http://hinduhumanrightswatch.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=57&Itemid=65)

As if driving them away at threat of rape and murder and forcing them to live for decades in squalid camps, they even targeted camps and killed them.  Kuffars, particularly idolater Hindus have to be decimated or converted.  Here are some pictures and stats.

Before any brain washed leftists opened their mouth, please see the following links:

What happened in India since Islam came over and killed 80 millions Hindus

http://opposemosqueatgroundzero.wordpress.com/911-sioa-rally/

 

Here is South Asian American report that was endorsed by respected US Congresspersons and Senators.   This was prepared by Washington DC advocacy group ‘Hindu American Foundation’.

http://www.hafsite.org/sites/default/files/HHR_2011_FINAL.pdf

 

The Assam take over is part of big plan blessed by Osama Bin Laden.
http://mughalistan.wordpress.com/

 

When I look at my daughter born here, I wonder what fate awaits her and her progeny.    Are we going to look other way and throw away their future?   Are we going to sacrifice the future of this nation in the name of political correctness?  How are we justifying funding of US Mosques by Saudis who are teaching nothing but hate to our people and our nation, while they would not allow to fund a single Church or Synagogue or temple in Saudi Arabia?   How are we going to control the tendency of Muslims to subvert our constitution and laws and impose Shariah law first on themselves and later as they gain majority, on all of us?  Are we going to learn the lesson the hard way?  Are we blind to the fact that, not a single Islamic country, NOT ONE, gives equal rights to non Muslims?

 

What happened in India during last few years where not a single terrorist was caught for vote banks, literally Sonia Gandhi allowed to be killed to make sure vote banks are not affected.

http://www.slideshare.net/truthaboutsoniagandhi/sonia-and-terrorism

 

 

BURNING ALIVE OF SUDANESE CHRISTIANS.    SAME WAY KUFFARS BURNT DURING PARTITION IN PAKISTAN, RECENTLY COPS IN MAHARASHTRA AFTER BANGING THEIR HEADS AND BURNT THEM.

KILLINGS, SLAUGHTERS AND GENOCIDES OF KUFFAR (from Islam-Watch website)

Followers of Quran and sunna mass murdered Sudani Christians by burning them alive.

(Hadith (Ishaq, p. 316): “Following Badr, Muhammad sent a number of raiders with orders to capture some of the Meccans and burn them alive.”)

ORDER from QURAN:

2.216: Fighting is prescribed for you

Q 9.5: Slay the infidels wherever you find them

COMPLIANCE

Q 3.152: You slew them by His permission.

Q 33.26: A part [of them] ye slew, and a part ye made captives; (900 men  of Quraiza tribe, above the age of 13 were killed, women and others were made captives).

Q 8.017: It is not ye who slew them; it was Allah:

Q 8.67: It hath not been [granted] unto any prophet, that he should possess captives, until he had made a great slaughter [of the infidels] in the earth.

Hadiths:

Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 512:

Narrated Anas: Prophet attacked Khaybar unannounced. Their men were killed, their offspring and woman taken as captives. Safiya was amongst the captives. She first came in the share of Dahya Alkali but later on she belonged to the Prophet.

Bukhari vol 3, Book 46, No. 717

Prophet had suddenly attacked Bani Mustaliq without warning while they were heedless and their cattle were being watered at the places of water. Their men were killed and their women and children were taken as captives; the Prophet got Juwairiya on that day.

“Sirat e Rasulullah” by Ishaq, p. 464:

After beheading  all  700-900 Quraiza men the apostle divided their property, wives and children as booty. He took Rayhana d. Amr b. Khunafa for himself.

TORTURING ORDER:

Q 9.5: kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, torture them, and lie in wait and ambush them

Q 5.33: murder them, crucify them, or cut off a hand and foot on opposite sides…

COMPLIANCE

Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 52, Number 259:

Allah’s Apostle sent us in a mission and said, “If you find so-and-so and so-and-so, burn both of them with fire”

Bukhari Volume 1, Book 4, Number 234:

Narrated Abu Qilaba: He then ordered to cut their hands and feet (and it was done), and their eyes were branded with heated pieces of iron, They were put in ‘Al-Harra’ and when they asked for water, no water was given to them.”

Tabari VIII, p. 122/Ishaq, p. 515:

The Prophet gave orders concerning Kinanah to Zubayr, saying, ‘Torture him until you root out and extract what he has. So Zubayr kindled a fire on Kinanah’s chest, twirling it with his firestick until Kinanah was near death. Then the Messenger gave him to Maslamah, who beheaded him.

Ishaq, p. 595: “The Apostle said, ‘Get him away from me and cut off his tongue.”