Intolerance of Islam

See this:

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/04/canada-muslim-woman-forced-to-flee-for-her-life-because-of-photo-of-niqab-wearing-woman-holding-bra.html

_

If the freedom loving Americans do not amend the constitution declaring Islam illegal, then USA will become a Muslism country. That means no freedom of thought, speech, religion, of any freedom for women.

According to the Quran, non-believers are …

From Dr VSH < >

The cat is out of the bag, and here one gets ample proof in terms of the Quranic suras along with their proper chapter and subheading numbers.  

 

Taken from TOI reader comments

 

 According to the Quran, non-believers…

…Eat like beasts .47:12

…Are a pes(t). 7:166, 5:60, 2:65

…Are swines. 5:60 Are asses 74:50

…The vilest of animals in Allah’s sight. 8:55

…Losers. 2:27, 2:121, 3:85

…Have a disease in their hearts. 2:10, 5:52, 24:50

…Are hard-hearted. 39:22, 57:16

…Impure of hearts. 5:41

…Are deaf. 2:171, 6:25

…Are blind. 2:171, 6:25

…Are dumb. 2:171, 6:35, 11:29

…Are niggardly. 4:37, 70:21

…Works shall be rendered ineffective.2:217, 47:1, 47:8

…Are impure. 8:37 Are scum. 13:17

…Are inordinate. 5:68, 78:22

…Are transgressors .2:26, 9:8, 46:20

…Are unjust. 29:49

…Make mischief .16:88

…Are the worst of men. 98:6

…Are in a state of confusion. 50:5

…Are the lowest of the low. 95:5

…Focus only on outward appearance. 19:73-74

…Are guilty. 30:12, 77:46

…Are sinful liars. 45:7

…Follow falsehood. 47:3

…Deeds are like the mirage in a desert. 24:39 also…

…Allah does not love them. 3:32, 22:38

…Allah forsakes them. 32:14, 45:34

…Allah brought down destruction upon them. 47:10

…Allah has c u r s e d them 2:88, 48:6

…Allah despises them. 17:18

…Allah abases them .22:18

 

Still sounds like hate speech to us!

and this is what being taught in all Madaraasaas and mosques.

 

Funny explanation of different economies based on 2 cows…

From: Mohindar S Virdy < >

 

Funny explanation of different economies based on 2 cows………………..

Aah, This is How it Works…..

 

SOCIALISM

You have 2 cows.

You give one to your neighbor.

 

COMMUNISM

You have 2 cows

The State takes both and gives you some milk.

 

FASCISM

You have 2 cows.

The State takes both and sells you some milk.

 

BUREAUCRATISM

You have 2 cows.

The State takes both, shoots one, milks the other and then throws the milk away.

 

TRADITIONAL CAPITALISM

You have two cows.

You sell one and buy a bull.

Your herd multiplies, and the economy grows.

You sell them and retire on the income.

 

VENTURE CAPITALISM

You have two cows.

You sell three of them to your publicly listed company, using letters of credit opened by your brother-in-law at the bank, then execute a debt/equity swap with an associated general offer so that you get all four cows back, with a tax exemption for five cows.

The milk rights of the six cows are transferred via an intermediary to a Cayman Island Company secretly owned by the majority shareholder who sells the rights to all seven cows back to your listed company. The annual report says the company owns eight cows, with an option on one more.

 

AN AMERICAN CORPORATION

You have two cows.

You sell one, and force the other to produce the milk of four cows. Later, you hire a consultant to analyze why the cow has dropped dead.

 

A FRENCH CORPORATION

You have two cows.

You go on strike, organize a riot, and block the roads, because you want three cows.

 

AN ITALIAN CORPORATION

You have two cows, but you don’t know where they are. You decide to have lunch.

 

A SWISS CORPORATION

You have 5,000 cows.

None of them belong to you. You charge the owners for storing them.

 

A CHINESE CORPORATION

You have two cows.

You have 300 people milking them. You claim that you have full employment and high bovine productivity.

You arrest the newsman who reported the real situation.

 

AN INDIAN CORPORATION

You have two cows.

You worship them.

 

A BRITISH CORPORATION

You have two cows.

Both are mad.

 

AN IRAQI CORPORATION

Everyone thinks you have lots of cows.

You tell them that you have none. Nobody believes you, so they bomb the crap out of you and invade your country.

You still have no cows but at least you are now a Democracy.

 

AN AUSTRALIAN CORPORATION

You have two cows.

Business seems pretty good. You close the office and go for a few beers to celebrate.

 

A NEW ZEALAND CORPORATION

You have two cows.

The one on the left looks very attractive.

 

A GREEK CORPORATION

You have two cows borrowed from French and German banks.

You eat both of them. The banks call to collect their milk, but you cannot deliver so you call the IMF. The IMF loans you two cows. You eat both of them.  The banks and the IMF call to collect their cows/milk.

You are out getting a haircut.

 

Koran’s Sura 109

From Vinod Kumar < >

Sura 109

Let me make a few comments on this Sura.

Mr. H wonders “How do you reconcile the text which says

“go kill all the non-believers”  with Sura 109 which I discussed 

earlier with D.The Quran continues to create the jihadi terrorists, yet 90% of Muslims continue 
to be peaceful law-abiding citizens, following Sura 109 perhaps even without knowing what it says.”

First part first — how to reconcile this Sura with the reast of the text that says “go kill all the non-believers”. Actually it is not all that difficult. The Prophet’s life had two distinct periods — the initial Meccan period and the later Medina period. During the first period he did not have much of a following and he gained barely 100 – 150 followers. During this period he was relatively mild and even willing to compromise with the Meccans as his so called “Satanic verses” reveal. But then due to opposition from his few followers, he recanted and called them “Satanic verses”. But after migrating to Medina and acquiring political power, he became very aggressive. Even in Mecca, though he was mild, probably due to lack of political power, he never really compromised his ideology. Sura 109 might seem like a compromise but if one looks at it carefully — it is not at all a compromise — rather it is very confrontational. It says “I will never worship what you worship” and then giving up in frustration he says “You will never worship what I worship.”  There is no compromise in it. The Sura does not say — what is important is being a good person, who you worship and in what form is rather immaterial. If really there is ONLY ONE GOd how can anyone worship anyone else? This is the point Krihsna makes in Gita. Whoever you worship — you still worship me as I am the only God. The form and shape and name is immaterial.

The Koran has dual nature — a peaceful and rather tolerant Meccan part and an aggressive intolerant Medina part and both having come — at least what the Muslims believe — from God cannot be wrong — thus a Muslim uses whatever suits him at the time. The law of abrogation — the later verses abrogating the earlier ones — is used selectively. The normal logic is if two things are contradictory — one of them must be wrong — but in Islam both are right.

The second part: “yet 90% of Muslims continue 

to be peaceful law-abiding citizens, following Sura 109 

perhaps even without knowing what it says.”

Very true — most of the Muslims are peaceful law abiding citizens. They are after all human beings and want a good life. They don’t all know what the Koran says and even some who know pay scant attention to it unless someone shames them into not being a “good Muslim”.

My thoughts for whatever these are worth.

Vinod Kumar

ETHICS & POWER by RAM JETHMALANI

ETHICS & POWER
by RAM JETHMALANI
http://sunday-guardian.com/profile/ram-jethmalani

Let truth be known about Modi
India was made to believe that Modi was complacent while riots seared Gujarat. Evidence indicates otherwise.

Gujarat CM Narendra Modi. REUTERS
The UPA government, on coming to power in 2004, put in place its most accomplished experts to meticulously draw up its corruption road map, which it succeeded in implementing with precision until the scams exploded in public space.
Post-mortem reports of the 2G scam, the ISRO Devas deal, the Commonwealth Games fraud, to name a few, clearly establish this. I have no doubt that future historians will place the UPA in the same league as other plunderers of India, like Ghazni and the Pindaris.

Another road map uppermost in the Congress agenda was towards the political assassination of Narendra Modi, and banishing him from India’s political firmament forever, using the unfortunate post Godhra riots as a handle. Congress think tanks worked overtime to draw up a comprehensive, multifaceted strategy of slander, false accusation, governmental and non-governmental disinformation, Goebellesian lies, aimed at converting falsehood into belief among the general population, opinion leaders and influential intellectuals.

The lies were to be simple and crisp; they were to be repeated ad nauseam to embed them firmly as truth in the public mind, the media and internationally. Puppets were to be created and nurtured to keep the fiction of Modi’s involvement in the Godhra riots alive in the courts, in the media and in the minds of the people, through any lie or deception.

Now that the SIT has completed its investigation, and submitted its report to the Supreme Court, it is time the nation and the world knew about the travesty of slander and lies that has been disseminated against Modi by the Congress through hired and unethical civil society organisations, such as Citizens for Justice and Peace headed by Teesta Setalvad, disgruntled officers like Sanjiv Bhatt, who made futile attempts to start an aggressive campaign against Modi 10 long years after the riots, and certain sections of the media. Today, the lid over the entire political conspiracy has blown, and the false testimony and machinations of Teesta Setalvad and Sanjiv Bhatt have been exposed.

Let me inform the people of a few instances of deliberate disinformation against Modi, which gained huge currency during the last 10 years, backed by the malicious hate campaign, which the SIT investigation has proved to be completely false.

1. The country was made to believe that Modi sat complacent and inert while the riots were searing Gujarat. The evidence indicates otherwise. Immediately after the Godhra train burning, on the evening of 27 February 2002, the Gujarat Chief Minister summoned an emergency meeting of top ranking officials of the government, took steps to deploy the Rapid Action Force (RAF), State Reserve Police, local police at sensitive points.
Since the army at Ahmedabad Cantonment had been called at the border in view of the attack on Parliament earlier, the Chief Minister requested the then Defence Minister telephonically on 28 February 2002, to immediately deploy army battalions to tackle the situation, which were deployed immediately.

2. The Congress, through its mouthpieces, Teesta Setalvad and Sanjiv Bhatt, maliciously fabricated a story, vigorously picked up by certain so called intellectuals and, of course, the anti national elements of our society, that Narendra Modi and the police administration conspired to carry out a pogrom by Hindus against Muslims and that the Gujarat riots were state sponsored.

Undisputed statistics presented to the SIT show that in the first six days of the riots, 61 Hindus and 40 Muslims were killed in police firing. The death of any person in police firing is tragic. But does a police firing death toll with 60% casualties being Hindu indicate a pogrom by the state government against Muslims? The complaint of Zakia Jafri (filed at the behest of Teesta Setalvad) alleges that the riots that followed the Godhra train carnage were a conspiracy and a pogrom by the ruling party in Gujarat and its Chief Minister in which almost the entire administration was a co-conspirator.
More particularly, they perpetrated a smear campaign that the Chief Minister had instructed the police officials not to interfere with or use force against the Hindus taking revenge against the Muslims. This allegation has not been supported by any evidence, except for the false testimony of Sanjiv Bhatt, which not only appeared suddenly after 10 years, but has also been demolished by positive evidence that he is lying.
Teesta Setalvad, under tutelage of the Congress government, propagated to the world at large that the Godhra train carnage was accidental and the riots were a conspiracy supported by the Gujarat government.

3. Another canard led by Teesta Setalvad and other vested interest groups globally was that the Gujarat government and its police did not investigate rape cases. Evidence before the SIT establishes that this was pure fiction, that all rape complaints were being investigated and some convictions had already taken place.
It also proved that Setalvad fabricated a false rape case in Naroda, which she alleged was not investigated, with the alleged victim herself denying it and also the eyewitness.
Another gruesome fabrication spread by Setalvad about the tearing of a pregnant woman’s stomach and lifting the fetus on the tip of the sword has been disproved by the SIT as false. On post mortem the foetus was found intact within the unfortunate dead lady who succumbed to burns during the riots, and was identified by her relatives. This is corroborated by the statement of the doctor who performed the post mortem.

4. While investigating the Gulbarg case, the SIT came across nearly 20 witnesses who came with their ready-made ‘typed statements’ and refused to videotape their statements, to which the SIT objected. When they did give their statements, they did not match the ready-made statements, and, also admitted to the SIT that the ‘typed statements’ were given to them by Teesta Setalvad.

5. The Gujarat police had found on investigation that the Godhra train carnage was a conspiracy and what followed was a violent reaction to it. Teesta Setalvad, under tutelage of the Congress government, propagated to the world at large that the Godhra train carnage was accidental and the riots were a conspiracy supported by the Gujarat government.
The Justice Banerjee Committee report claiming the Godhra train burning to be an accident was held illegal by the High Court of Gujarat.
The SIT also rejected the accident theory, and found on re-investigation that the Godhra carnage was, indeed, a conspiracy to burn and bake the unwary passengers and the riots were a reaction. This fact is now judicially established in the trial of Godhra incident by the sessions judge appointed by the then Chief Justice of Gujarat High Court as directed by the Supreme Court.
The very fact that one of the principal accused in the Godhra carnage is now a fugitive in Pakistan, with an Interpol Red Corner Notice, clearly reveals how the conspiracy originated. So, another evil myth to poison the minds of the people of our country against Modi has been disproved by a series of judicial findings.

6. It is now widely known that the entire anthology of false and gruesome stories brought to the notice of the Supreme Court by mainly Citizens of Justice and Peace, the NGO headed by Teesta Setalvad, on the basis of which the Supreme Court appointed the SIT itself, were found by the SIT to be false.
Modi bashing, Modi defamation became a lucrative industry and a blood sport during the last 10 years. Appropriate recruitments were done, the Goebbelsian strategy that if you repeat a lie a thousand times, it will become a truth was used to the hilt.
The Congress and Teesta Setalvad must have basked in their success until the SIT findings revealed not only the real truth to the world, but, also exposed the lies of Setalvad and Sanjiv Bhatt, in tutoring witnesses, pressurizing them to give false affidavits, and providing false information to the SIT and the Supreme Court.
Though still trying their best to attack the SIT, there is little they can do, as all statements of all witnesses are recorded under videography.

7. The enemies of India desperately tried to turn the unfortunate Gujarat riots into a global issue and grievously tarnish Gujarat and Modi through their strategy of repeating lies. But, the same Europeans who had succumbed to Teesta Setalvad’s pogrom and state sponsored riot theory in 2002, appear to have realised their mistake, and are now graciously making amends, not to mention the overtures made to Modi by the UK and the US.
Well, the lengthy SIT process that involved thousands of witnesses and reams of evidence is over, and Modi has emerged unscathed. It is now time that the conspiracy against Modi and Gujarat should forcefully be informed to the general public, the “secular” intellectuals, the opinion makers and the media.

AANMIGAM – HINDU CULTURE BEING WIPED AWAY

From: Varadachari Srinivasan < >

Subject: AANMIGAM – HINDU CULTURE BEING WIPED AWAY

” It’s time we realize our culture is being wiped away!!!  If you care, forward this

                                                                            

Why are we Hindus taking all this lying down? Why is there an IAS officer as head of every temple? Can they dare go to a Masjid or a church? Please see the article and decide for yourself.

                                             

Foreign writer opens our eyes.                                    

 

The Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Act of 1951 allows State Governments and politicians to take over thousands of Hindu Temples and maintain complete control over them and their properties. It is claimed that they can sell the temple assets and properties and use the money in any way they choose. 

                                                                

A charge has been made not by any Temple authority, but by a foreign writer, Stephen Knapp in a book (Crimes Against India) and the Need to Protect Ancient Vedic Tradition) published in the United States that makes shocking reading.

                                                                               

Hundreds of temples in centuries past have been built in India by devout rulers and the donations given to them by devotees have been used for the benefit of the (other) people. If, presently, money collected has ever been misused (and that word needs to be defined), it is for the devotees to protest and not for any government to interfere.   This letter is what has been happening currently under an intrusive law.   

                                                            

It would seem, for instance, that under a Temple Empowerment Act, about 43,000 temples in Andhra Pradesh have come under government control and only 18 per cent of the revenue of these temples have been returned for temple purposes, the remaining 82 per cent being used for purposes unstated.               

                                                                                           

Apparently even the world famous Tirumala Tirupati Temple has not been spared. According to Knapp, the temple collects over Rs 3,100 crores every year and the State Government has not denied the charge that as much as 85 per cent of this is transferred to the State Exchequer, much of which goes to causes that are not connected with the Hindu community. Was it for that reason that devotees make their offering to the temples? Another charge that has been made is that the Andhra Government has also allowed the demolition of at least ten temples for the construction of a golf course. Imagine the outcry, writes Knapp, if ten mosques had been demolished. It would seem that in Karanataka, Rs. 79 crores were collected from about  two lakh temples and from that, temples received Rs seven crores for their maintenance, Muslim madrassahs and Haj subsidy were given Rs. 59 crore and churches about Rs 13 crores.  Very generous of the government.

 

Because of this, Knapp writes, 25 per cent of the two lakh temples or about 50,000 temples in Karnataka will be closed down for lack of resources, and he adds: The only way the government can continue to do this is because people have not stood up enough to stop it.                                                

 Knapp then refers to Kerala where, he says, funds from the Guruvayur Temple are diverted to other government projects denying improvement to 45 Hindu temples. Land belonging to the Ayyappa Temple, apparently has been grabbed and Church encroaches are occupying huge areas of forest land, running into thousands of acres, near Sabarimala.                                                             

 A charge is made that the Communist state government of Kerala wants to pass an Ordinance to disband the Travancore & Cochin Autonomous Devaswom  Boards (TCDBs) and take over their limited independent authority of 1,800 Hindu temples. If what the author says is true, even the Maharashtra Government wants to take over some 450,000 temples in the state which would supply a huge amount of revenue to correct the states bankrupt conditions                                                                            

 

And to top it all, Knapp says that in Orissa, the state government intends to sell over 70,000 acres of endowment lands from the Jagannath Temple, the proceeds of which would solve a huge financial crunch brought about by its own mismanagement of temple assets.                                                                                

 Says Knapp: Why such occurrences are so often not known is that the Indian media, especially the English television and press, are often anti-Hindu in their approach, and thus not inclined to give much coverage, and  certainly no sympathy, for anything that may affect the Hindu community. Therefore, such government action that play against the Hindu community go on without much or any attention attracted to them.                                                                                

 Knapp obviously is on record. If the facts produced by him are incorrect, it is up to the government to say so. It is quite possible that some individuals might have set up temples to deal with lucrative earnings. But that, surely, is none of the governments business?  Instead of taking over all earnings, the government surely can appoint local committees to look into temple affairs so that the amount discovered is fairly used for the public good?                                                                  

 Says Knapp: Nowhere in the free, democratic world are the religious institutions managed, maligned and controlled by the government, thus denying the religious freedom of the people of the country. But it is happening in India. Government officials have taken control of Hindu temples because they smell money in them, they recognize the indifference of Hindus, they are aware of the unlimited patience and tolerance of Hindus, they also know that it is not in the blood of Hindus to go to the streets to demonstrate, destroy property, threaten, loot, harm and kill.

 

Many Hindus are sitting and watching the demise of their culture. They need to express their views loud and clear Knapp obviously does not know that should they do so, they would be damned as communalists.  But it is  time someone asked the Government to lay down all the facts on the table so that the public would know what is happening behind its back. Robbing Peter to pay Paul is not secularism. And temples are not for looting, under any name. One thought that Mohammad of Ghazni has long been dead.                                                                                                                                

HARD REALITIES………                                                      

Hinduism remains the most attacked and under siege of all the major world religions. This is in spite of the fact that Hinduism is the most tolerant, pluralistic and synthetic of the world’s major religions.

 

 

from:
Natarajan K.S.
Chennai – 600101

==

[The problem is the law or constitution of Bhaarat is anti-Vedic, and so it need to be amended by the majority (Vedics). – Skanda987]

 

How to Weed Out Criminals from Indian Parlament & Assemblies?

From: N.S.Venkataraman < >

To:  Stop-Corruption-Worldwide

HOW TO WEED OUT CRIMINALS FROM INDIAN PARLIAMENT AND ASSEMBLIES ?

 

The pre condition to eliminate corruption in India is to prevent the corrupt persons and criminals from entering parliament and assemblies.  How to achieve this end ?

It  is not possible to defeat them in the polls,  in view of their extensive money power and muscle power and criminal ridden political parties skilfully aligning between themselves as one front or the other and leaving the citizens with no choice other than voting to  any one of the corruption ridden front.

 The obvious solution is to prevent the corrupt persons and criminals from contesting the elections at all. The Chief Election Commissioner has correctly said that those against whom criminal charges have been admitted in the court for hearing should not be allowed to contest the elections.  But, the Chief Election Commissioner appears to conveniently think that  the Government of India should  do this by passing appropriate  law, which would never happen with so many criminals and corrupt persons now sitting in the parliament.  Certainly, Chief Election Commissioner would also know this  !

 Obviously, the Election Commissioners do not realise that the Election Commission has the residual and inherent power  to ban such persons from contesting the polls, since the Election Commission has been given the responsibility by the Constitution to ensure free and fair polls.  Banning the corrupt and criminals is the ultimate tool that the  Election Commission  would be well justified in employing  to fulfil its Constitutional responsibility of ensuring fair and free election.

 What the country needs today is strong  and committed  Election Commissioners who would not feel helpless but act  towards the cause of healthy parliamentary democracy.  The Constitution makers  have given the unwritten,  inherent powers to the Election Commissions   by entrusting with  them great responsibility of ensuring free and fair elections. Today, the corrupt and criminals entering parliament and assemblies is not  in spite of Election Commission’s efforts but due to its lack of efforts.

 

N.S.Venkataraman

Nandini Voice for The Deprived

Chennai