Who is a Hindu

Pak and Taliban-s big plan to destroy India

From: Mohan Natarajan < >

To: India’s Media:

ONE SIDED ARTICLE YES, WE KHAN

I agree with one point – if Hindus had been bad, Muslim population in India would not have grown from 4 crores at the time of partition to the present 24 crores.  If Sagarika discusses the following points, she can caption the next article NO, WE KHANNOT

1. Why the Indian media is keeping quiet over the genocide of Hindus in Pakistan – the Hindu population at the time of partition was around 17% and now it is less than 1%?  Is that goodness of Muslims?

2. Why the Indian media is keeping quiet over the genocide of Hindus in Bangladesh – the Hindu population at the time of partition was around 33% and now it is less than 7%.  Genocide – Bangladesh Human Rights commission had said that 35 million Hindus could not be accounted for.

Why not a single Muslim has migrated to Bangladesh or Pakistan, despite the creation of A SEPARATE MUSLIM COUNTRY.

3. Why the media is keeping a deathly silence over the massacre and ethnic cleansing of Hindus in Kashmir?  4 lac pundits are refugees in their own land for the last 25 years – Pundits were the original inhabitants – their lineage goes back to 3000 years and Muslims lineage goes back to less than 1000 years?  IS IT NOT SHAMEFUL THAT NO INDIAN IS TAKING AN INITIATIVE TO TEACH A LESSON TO OMAR AND FAROOK? – the media treats the Abdullahs as sacred guests – IS IT NOT A DOUBLE SHAME?

4. Why the media failed to ask the Muslims – WHY YOU ROASTED ALIVE 59 innocent women and children in Godhra?  Why the media did not publish the names of the victims and their photos?

5. Why the media did not mention that 259 Hindus were killed during

2002 riots?  Why the media did not mention the fact that so many rounds of firing were resorted to, to control the rioting?  A French journalist had mentioned in detail, the steps taken by Modi government to quell the riots.  Why the Indian media is silent on this?

6. Nanavathi commission had submitted the final report on Gujarat riots.  Why the media did not discuss in detail, about the contents of

this report?

7. Why Ambedkar told Gandhi that there must be exchange of Muslim population after partition?  Why Ambedkar correctly felt that Muslims can never co-exist with Hindus?

8. Why Rajedra Prasad told Gandhi that if Muslims are retained in India, they should be disenfranchised?

9. Why Huntington said that Muslims can never co-exist with other religionists?

10. Why Prathipal Singh, Prof. Alberta University, Canada remarked

THAT MUSLIMS WILL ALWAYS BE AN OPPRESSIVE MAJORITY AND A TURBULENT MINORITY?

11. Why Will Durant said that the greatest genocide on earth was the massacre of 100 million Hindus by the invading Muslims, who ruled

India for over 800 years?

12. Why Ambedkar told dalits not to embrace Islam or Christianity? –

He felt that if they do so, they will get denationalized.  They will be only Muslims or Christians – not Indians.

13. When 62% of Indians live on Rs.20 a day and 60% of womenfolk have no access to sanitary napkins and 60% of the Indians have no toilets, where is the question of Muslim poverty – if you assume, all the

20% Muslims are poverty-stricken, still it leaves more than 40% of Hindus poverty-stricken. Why Sachar committee only for Muslims?

14. When Hussain drew porno of Hindu Gods and Goddesses, the entire media, supported Hussain, saying nobody can interfere with his right to freedom of expression. When the greatest secular paper on earth, THE HINDU, by oversight, published a caricature of Prophet, the Muslims protested and THE HINDU, TENDERED A FRONT PAGE

APOLOGY. Why? WILL TOI PUBLISH A SKETCH OF PROPHET?

15. Why Taslima Nasrin’s book LAJJA was banned?

15. Why Rushdie’s Satanic verses was banned?

16. Why the media is supporting KP – because only Hinduism is attacked?

17. Why the media questions the recent Pakistani boat (terror, smuggler, etc.) exploding in the mid sea, as a PR exercise for BJP – that too in front of a Pakistani journalist – is it not sedition?

18. Why Musharraf remarked that Pakistani terrorists need not bleed India.  Indian media is doing a better job (during the Agra summit)

19. Why the media never advises the minorities to join the mainstream?

20. Why the media did not highlight the treatment meted out to Hindus in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Kashmir valley etc.?  How the Kashmir valley was allowed to become Hindu-free?

21. What will happen if Hindus do to Muslims, what they have done to Hindus?

22. Tell me one place in the world where Hindus enjoy minority rights, as minorities enjoy in India.

23. Why the media is not driving home the point that only in India,

Muslims are enjoying democracy for the last 66 years.

I am also attaching a news item on Kashmiri pundits:

QUOTE

25 YEARS OF EXILE

19th January — KASHMIRI HINDU HOLOCAUST DAY

Every year Kashmiri Hindus all over the country observe 19th of January as ‘Holocaust Day’. It was on this day in 1990 terrorist entrepreneurs under the aegis of JKLF and other allied outfits declared war against the minority Kashmiri Hindu community through hate campaigns, threats, selective killings, bomb attacks etc. This paved way for religious-cleansing of Kashmiri Hindus, the aborigines of Kashmir.

 No Kashmiri Hindu who has lived those days in Kashmir and retains some sensitivity can over-come these nightmarish experiences. That is why on this day Kashmiri Hindus hold protests, take out rallies and make resolve to keep reminding the world that this community will never accept its cleansing as fait accompli. Kashmiri Hindus have been great survivors and retain the will to survive in future also.

Exile leads to spiritual impoverishment—not only in cultural terms but also in retaining memory of the cleansing act itself. Fear, insecurity, powerful adversary, insensitivity all around etc. tend to induce de politicization and feelings of defeatism.

 As the exile gets prolonged the mass of the exiled community comes to regard its own self as the worst enemy. The resultant social distortion of its personality makes it behave in bizarre ways. It seeks to invent virtues in those who imposed genocide on it. Secondly, it begins to advocate its redemption by undermining its own community—its ethos, culture, struggle, leadership and comes to regard assimilation in alien culture and erosion of its identity as its ultimate salvation. This has been true of all exiled groups in history.

If living in exile is not accompanied by consciousness of exile, the exiled community would not be able to preserve its identity consciousness for retrieving its homeland. Observance of the ‘Holocaust Day’ addresses this dimension as well, besides keeping political visibility on genocide. A new generation of Kashmiri Hindus born after 1990 have no memories—of being pushed out or the nostalgia of living Kashmiri way of life in the ambience of Kashmir. How do they relate themselves to the moment for retrieval of homeland? Participation in community agendas on ‘Holocaust Day’ and other days affords an opportunity.

In 1990 when Kashmiri Hindus were thrown out from Kashmir by Jihadist fascist forces, the displaced community faced total isolation. Regional mainstream parties in Kashmir were hostile because Kashmiri Hindus refused to endorse the parochial religious sub-nationalism espoused by them. Left\Libeof Panun Kashmir are slowly succeeding in breaking this vicious circle of isolation. The forces of history are also playing their role. Travelling of jihadist terrorism to the mainland is making the nation aware that Kashmiri Hindus were only the first victims in the jihadist war. Its larger target was the idea of India itself. Kashmiri Hindus are thus finding new allies.

It is time the ruling dispensations in Delhi realize that genocide of Kashmiri Hindus needs to be reversed lock, stock and barrel. Political structures in which Kashmiri Hindus lived prior to 1990 only facilitated their complete cleansing from their homeland. They cannot return to the same structure.

Kashmiri Hindus look to Narendra Modi with great hope and optimism. It is our strong belief based on ground realities that the separatist campaign in Kashmir is not an issue of local alienation or a legacy of partition. The separatist campaign is part of a war being waged to dismantle India’s northern frontiers and pave a way for the balkanization of the country. The religious cleansing of their community was a consequence of this campaign.

They challenged the very concept of Kashmiriyat. Apart from underlining the need to accelerate the process of nation-building and protecting and securing the Himalayan frontiers and eliminating the forces inimical to India and the minorities in the state.

The structural reorganization of Jammu & Kashmir in the larger framework of the reorganization of the state is a political necessity. It is GOI’s responsibility to create a new dispensation as demanded by Panun Kashmir in Kashmir, in which there would be no future refoulment. It is to this dispensation the entire displaced community would return to live there on permanent basis. Till then Kashmiri Hindus need to keep up their struggle.

 This is the message for the ‘Holocaust Day’.

UNQUOTE

Can I wait for another article NO WE KHAN-NOT

Thanking you,

N Mohan

From: Devinder Thakur < >

Ulama Iqbal has explained the role of a good Muslim which is as follows

On VarNa (Vedic Social Class)

of the Muslims Who Became Hindus

The Muslims of Bhaarat now are quitting Islam and accepting the Vedic dharma because they know that a few centuries ago their ancestors were Vedics who were forced to accept Islam. Now in democracy they are free to quit Islam and become Hindus (Vedics) again. Some Vedic organizations run a program called Ghar Waapasi to facilitate them to become Vedics. Bhaarat’s “communal” problems will end when all the Muslims of Bhaarat give up Islam, and do not convert to any anti-Vedic religion.

A question is, what Vedic varNa they will be in? Will they be called Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishya’s, or Shudras? There are a few facts stated below that influence an answer to the question.

1. Bhagavaan Krishna says inBhagavad Gita (which is known as The Book of Vedic dharma) that He created four classes of the Vedic society according toguNa (qualifications) and karma (actions.)
   4. He says: “According to the three modes of material nature and the work ascribed to them, the four divisions of human society were created by Me. .. ..” – Gita 4.13

Krishna also describes dharma/duties of each varNa as follows:

“Brahmanas, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas and Sudras are distinguished by their qualities of work, O chastiser of the enemy, in accordance with the modes of nature.” –Gita 18.41

“Peacefulness, self-control, austerity, purity, tolerance, honesty, wisdom, knowledge, and religiousness–these are the qualities by which the Brahmana’s work.” – Gita 18.42

“Heroism, power, determination, resourcefulness, courage in battle, generosity, and leadership are the qualities of work for the Kshatriyas.” – Gita 18.43

“Farming, cow protection and business are the qualities of work for the Vaishyas, and for the Sudras there is labor and service to others.” – Gita 18.44

“By following his qualities of work, every man can become perfect. Now please hear from Me how this can be done.” – Gita 18.45

This verse says that each person of any varNa can advance spiritually by doing his/her prescribed duties of that varNa.

2. A mantra in PurUsh SUkta says:

ब्राह्मणोऽस्य मुखम् आसीत् बाहू राजन्यः कृतः।

ऊरु तदस्य यद् वैश्य पद् भ्याम् शूद्रो अजायत॥

It says that Brahmins are the head of Viraat, Kshatriya are arms, Vaishyas are belly, and Shudras are legs of the Viraat. Each of the four parts of the body need to take care of each other. No part is superior or inferior. Therefore, no varNa should hate or look down at any other varNa. No varNa should oppress any other varNa.

3. There is a verse in Mahabharat:

जन्मना जायते शूद्रः संस्कारत् भवेत् द्विजः ।

वेद-पठत् भवेत् विप्रः ब्रह्म जानत् इति ब्राह्मणः ॥

– MahaBharatha Shanthi Parva 188.

Translation around the shloka is provided below.

Bharadwaja said:

“By what acts does one become a Brahmana? By what, a Kshatriya? O best of regenerate ones, by what acts again does one become a Vaisya or a Sudra? Tell me this, O foremost of speakers.”

Bhrigu said:

“That person is called a Brahmana who has been sanctified by such rites as those called jata and others; who is pure in behavior; who is engaged in studying the Vedas; who is devoted to the six well-known acts (of ablutions every morning and evening, silent recitation of mantras, pouring libations on the sacrificial fire, worshipping the deities, doing the duties of hospitality to guests, and offering food to the Viswedevas); who is properly observant of all pious acts; who never takes food without having offered it duly to gods and guests; who is filled with reverence for his preceptor; and who is always devoted to vows and truth. He is called a Brahmana in whom are truth, gifts, abstention from injury to others, compassion, shame, benevolence, and penance.

He who is engaged in the profession of battle, who studies the Vedas, who makes gifts (to Brahmanas) and takes wealth (from those he protects) is called a Kshatriya.

He who earns fame from keep of cattle, who is employed in agriculture and the means of acquiring wealth, who is pure in behavior and attends to the study of the Vedas, is called a Vaisya.

He who takes pleasure in eating every kind of food, who is engaged in doing every kind of work, who is impure in behavior, who does not study the Vedas, and whose conduct is unclean, is said to be a Sudra.

4. Below verse is also from Mahabharat:

सत्यम् दानमथाद्रोह आनृशन्स्यम् त्रप घृणा ।

तपश्च दृश्यते यत्र स ब्राह्मण इति स्मृतः ॥

शूद्रे चैतद् भवेल्लक्ष्यम् द्विजे तच्च न विद्यते ।

न वै शूद्रो भवेच्छूद्रो ब्राहमणो न च ब्राहमणः ॥ Mahabharat Shaa. 188.4.8

Translation: In whom the qualities such as truthfulness, charity, non-enviousness, and absence of cruelty, shame in doing bad acts, mercy, compassion, and austerity are seen is called a Brahmin. If this qualities are seen in a Shudra, then he is not a Shudra, and if these qualities are not seen in a Brahmana, then he is not a Brahmana.

5. We also know that the Hindus identify a child’s varNa by the varNa of its parents, and all Brahmins do not have their guNa and karma of a real Brahmin. Same for all other three varNas. There are marriages between VarNas; so it is not clear what varNa the children of such marriages can be identified. As a conversion, the child is identified with its father’s varNa.

So then what is the varNa of the Muslims who gave up Islam and accepted Vedic dharma? Considering all the above I would say this:

Let a Vedic guru in a bona fide sampradaaya consider a person’s guNa and karma. Based on that the guru can recommend a suitable name for the person. There are hundreds of last names (family names) in each varNa. Alternatively, a person can choose his/her own Vedic last name that does or does not indicate a varNa. The person must get an official ID card from a local gov’t office with the new name.

For social, political, employment or dharmic purpose, the Vedics need to see one’s guNa and karma, not the last name of the person. Any person can, is free to, develop guNa and karma of any other varNa.

The government should not provide any special benefits to any particular varNa because doing so unduly motivates the person to remain in that varNa.

The International Society of Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON) is very successful in converting any person from any race or religion to Krishna Bhakti. Thus, all the Hare Krishna’s are Vedic. They adopt Vedic dress, manners, customs, and names, and a mantra. I suggest that all who come back to Vedic dharma, associate with a local Hare Krishna temple and develop Krishna Bhakti.

Jai Sri Krishna!

Suresh Vyas

8 Jan. 2015