The Roots of Terrorism

Compiled and Edited By

Anand Shankar

Foreword

Shri Anand Shankar has done a timely service by collecting article of his own and of others who have written on the scourage of terrorism confronting India today. What is terrorism and how do we deter terrorist acts in our country?

Media coverage of every terrorist incident over the years has complicated the difficulties of defining terrorism because there is no distinction drawn in the media between pure terrorist acts and terrorism as a phenomenon. A common accepted definition of terrorism does not exist even amongst the various concerned anti-terrorism agencies across the globe. The definition of terrorism as a phenomenon hinges on three characteristics: the goals, the method, and the identity of the perpetrator of acts of terror.

Terrorism is a threat to our national security. A nation enjoys national security only if it does not have to sacrifice its national interests and legitimate aspirations to avoid violent conflicts, and also committed and able if challenged, to defend these interests by war if necessary. National security requires thus a nation’s determination to preserve certain interests are: nation’s integrity, political independence, and fundamental political institutions. Thus, India’s national security policy must concern preserving the nation’s territorial integrity, political independence, fundamental democratic institutions and ancient cultural values.

Terrorism is thus premeditated politically motivated and/or religiously-inspired violence perpetrated against non-combatant target population by clandestine agents, by intimidation to overawe the civilian population, to do or not do an act against their will and well being. It is a strategy of violence by the perpetrators to generate fear, disruption, and ultimately secure their nefarious objectives through capitulation of the civilian law-abiding citizens.

What is Terrorism?

U.S.Fed.Cr. Code Chapter 113b Part I of Title 18 defines terrorism briefly as: Life threatening acts to coerce civilian population or influence policy of a government by intimidation and affect its conduct.

India has had chequered history of combating terrorism. The earliest terror tactics in modern India were deployed in Bengal in 1946 by extremist Muslim leaders, Sunhrawardly and Jinnah, to terrorize Hindus to give in on the demand for Pakistan, The Congress Party claiming to represent the Hindus capitulated who were 75 per cent of the population and handed 25 percent of the territory of India on a platter to Mohammed Ali Jinnah soon thereafter. Things have not improved much since then. According to Union Home Ministry’s Annual Report to Parliament, it is stated that of the 35 States of today’s India,29 are afflicted by terrorism. There are about 25 terrorist attacks per month in the country. India is thus a seriously terror-challenged nation.

Although terrorism is certainly not a phenomenon of the twentieth century, its growth since 1968 has been greatly enhanced by three specific innovations of the 20th century. First, the invention of television with instant satellite relay which had suddenly given small unknown groups the possibility of a worldwide publicity manifold. The fact, that most terrorist incidents have taken place in the democratic states may in part be due to the availability of this instant publicity.

With the freely available media, small groups of terrorists can achieve heavy leverage against powerful opponents by focusing large publicity on politically small events. The impace is mostly psychological and meant for media coverage.

Second, the incredible sophistication of modern weapons and its proliferation have enabled small number of criminal minded persons to do great harm. The erstwhile Soviet Union was largely the suppliers of these weapons starting with AK-47. In 1973, for example, the Italian police nabbed five Arab terrorists who were setting up SA-7 missiles in a rented apartment four miles from Rome’s Leonardo da Vinci Airport. These missiles were intended for use against an Israel Civilian airliner. The SA-7 is a Soviet heat-seeking, precision guided missile. It can be carried comfortably on a man’s back and can destroy a plane at altitudes of up to 6,500 feet. United States intelligence sources have reported that SA-7 missiles have surfaced in almost all Arab countries and some African nations, including Mozambique. Libya had obtained from the USSR large quantities of RPG-7 rockets which weigh under ten pounds, can be hand carried and can destroy a tank, a speaker’s platform, or a limousine. In this connection, the IRA is known to have used RPG-7 rockets against armored British military vehicles and police instillations.

Third, easy communication through internet and cell/satellite phones enabled active co-operation between various terrorist groups. The pilgrims at Lord Airport in Israel were massacred by Japanese Red Army (JRA) members acting for the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). The terrorists who raided the Vienna OPEC meeting were made up of elements from the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), a PLO group, and the Badder-Meinhof gang (Rote Armee Fraktion, RAF), the West German anarchist group.

Within India, the LTTE, PWG, ULFA, Naxaliies, Nepal Maoists, Al Qaeda are all coordinating their terrorist activities and training.

Since Independence, during the last six decades, the British imperialist-inspired Dravidian Movement founded by E.V.Ramaswamy Naicker, in the name of rationalism, tried to debunk as irrational the Hindu religion, and terrorized the Hindu priestly class, i.e., the Brahmins, for propagating the Hindu religion. The goal was to make Tamil Nadu State secede from India. The movement’s organizational arm, the Dravida Kazhagam (DK), had even venerated Ravana for fifty years to spite the Hindu adoration of Rama and vulgarize the abduction of Sita to create the psychology of separateness. These DK semi-literatures belatedly learnt that Ravana was himself a Brahmin and a pious bhakta of Lord Shiva too. The DK have now abandoned praising Ravana, and have instead become agents of the anti-Indian LTTE, which terrorist organization has specialized in killing Hindu Tamil leadership of Sri Lanka.

In the 1960s, the Christian missionaries inspired the Nagas to seek secession. The Nagas that wanted to further amputate the nation by seeking secession of Nagaland from the Indian nation. In the 1980s, the Hindus of Manipur were targeted by foreign trained elements. Manipuris were told: give up Hinduism or be killed. In Kashmir, since the beginning of the 1990s, militants in league with the Pakistani trained terrorists also targeted the Hindus by driving the Hindu pandit community out of the Valley, or killing them or dishonoring their women folk.

Globally today, the US, Israel and India are seen as the principal target nation for terrorists. And within India, the Hindus are the targets only because they are Hindus, while the leading terrorists are Islamic Fundamentalists.

Recognizing that in the targeting of Hindus, Muslim of India are largely just passive spectators. Islamic terrorists are beginning to engage in terrorist acts that could pit Muslims against Hindus in nation-wide conflagration and possible civil war as in Serbia and Bosnia.

Therefore we have to have a collective mindset as Hindus to stand against the terrorists. In this response, Muslim and Christians of India can join us if they genuinely feel for the Hindu. That they do would be credible if though they may be Muslims or Christians, they proudly declare that their ancestors are Hindus. It is not easy for them to acknowledge this ancestry because the Muslim Mullahs and Christian Missionaries would consider it as unacceptable since that realization of Hindu ancestry would dilute the religious fervor in their faith and also create an option for those who do so acknowledge, for re-conversion to the Hinduism. Hence, these religious leaders preach hatred and violence against the kafir and the pagan i.e. the Hindu to keep the faith of their followers. The Islamic terrorist outfits, e.g. the SIMI being the latest, has already resolved that Indi is Darul Harab, and they are committed to make it Darul Islam. That makes them free of any moral compunction whatsoever in dealing with Hindus. This mentality is at the root of Islamic terrorism in India.

But still, if any Muslim or Christian does so acknowledge his or heir Hindu legacy, then Hindus can accept him or her as a part of the Brihad Hindu Samaj, which is Hindustan. India that is Bharat that is Hindustan is a nation of Hindus and those others whose ancestors are Hindus. Even Parsi and Jews in India have Hindu ancestors. Others, those who refuse to so acknowledge or those foreigners who become Indian citizens by registration can remain in India, but should not have voting rights (which means thy cannot be elected representatives).

Four Lessons from History

Hence, the first four lessons from history to be learnt from re-centhistory, for tackling terrorism in India is that the Hindu is target and that Muslims of India are being programmed to slide into suicide against Hindus. It is to undermine the Hindu psyche and create fear of civil war that terror attacks are organized. And hence since the Hindu is the target. Hindus must collectively respond as Hindus against the terrorist and not feel individually isolated or worse, be complacement because he or she is not personally affected. This is an essential mental attitude, a necessary part of a virat Hindu (for fuller discussion of the concept of virat Hindu, see my Hindus Under Seige: The Way Out.,Haranand,2006).

Hence, to begin with, any policy to combat terrorism must first begin with requiring each and every Hindu becoming a committed or virat Hindu, or be ostracized as a ‘tankhiya’. If it is not enough commitment if one claims to be Hindu, or goes to temples, does pujas, and celebrates festivals. That is not sufficient to be a committed or virat Hindu. To be a virat Hindu one must have a Hindu mindset.

The second lesson for combating the terrorism we face today that we need to learn is: since demoralizing the Hindu and undermining the Hindu foundation of India in order to destroy the Hindu civilization, is the goal of all terrorists in India, we must never capitulate and never concede any demand of the terrorists. Terrorists are encouraged by appeasement but never satisfied by it. Therefore, no matter how many Hindus have to die for it, the basic policy has to be : never yield to any demand of the terrorists. That necessary resolve has not been shown in our recent history. Instead ever since we conceded Pakistan in 1947 under duress, we have been mostly yielding time and time again.

In 1989, to obtain the release of Mufti Mohammed Sayeed’s daughter, Rubaiyya who had been ‘kidnapped by terrorists, five terrorists in Indian jails were set free by the V.P.Singh’s Government. This made these criminals in the eyes of Kashmiri separatists and fence sitters as heroes, as those who had brought India’s Hindu establishment on it’s knees. To save Rubaiyya it was not necessary to surrender to terrorist demands.

However, in 1991, when Chandrashekhar was PM, I was his senior Minister handling the Law & Justice portfolio, Saifuddin Soz’s daughter was kidnapped by the JKLF. They too made the same demand (release of four terrorists in jail), but we refused. We also took some secret retaliatory action which made the JKLF frightened and hence Soz’s daughter was put on an auto rickshaw and sent home unharmed. This toughness was shown at a time when our government was tottering and to fall! The difference with the V.P. Singh’s Government was in our mindset it had become clear from day one of the kidnapping to the JKLF that we meant business as also that two can play the game of terror.

We also showed similar grit and guts when we received information that LTTE had established a parallel establishment in Tamil Nadu, with Karunanidhi’s connivance. Most of the senior bureaucrats of our government had warned that we risked bloodshed and rise of separatist Dravidian movement, sacked the Governor for inaction, and smashed the terror infrastructure in the State. Had we not done that then, Tamil Nadu would have been worse today than Kashmir. Thus toughness on both occasions was rewarded.

The worst capitulation to terrorists in our modern history was in the Indian Airlines hijack incident in December end 1999. The terrorists after hijacking an India Airlines flight from Kathmandu to Delhi, demanded money and release of three of the most dreaded terrorists held in judicial custody in Jammu jail (Maulana Masood Azhar, Omar Sheikh, and Ahmed Zargar). About 40 police persons had earlier died in various encounters to capture them. Yet in the call of saving the lives of 259 passengers in the IA Airbus parked in Kandhahar, the government released these terrorists even without getting court permission (required since they were in judicial custody). Moreover they were escorted by a senior Minister on the PM’s special Boeing all the way to Kandhahar as royal guests instead of being shoved across the Indo-Pakistan border.

Worst still, all the three after being freed, went back to Pakistan and created three separate terrorist organizations to kill Hindus. Mohammed Azhar, whom the National Security Adviser Brijesh Mishra had then described (on NDTV) as “as mere harmless cleric”, upon his release led the LeT to savage and repeated terrorists attacks on Hindus all over India from Bangalore to Srinagar. Since mid-2000, Azhar is responsible for killing of over 2000 Hindus. Omar Sheikh is in jail for killing US journalist Daniel Pearl and is in US custody, while the third, Zargar is engaged today in random killing of Hindus in Doda and Jammu.

The third lesson to be learnt is that whatever and however small the terrorist incident, the nation must retaliate not by measured and “sober” responses but by massive retaliation. For example, when Ayodhya Temple was sought to be attacked, or the Institute of Science in Bangalore was targeted, these were not big terrorist incidents but we should have massively retaliated. Our Intelligence agencies keep telling me in private that we have clinching proof of terrorist training camps in POK and Bangladesh, and Indian government also claims proof which has not been made public that there are 57 camps in Pakistani held territory and 36 camps in Bangladesh.

We could demand territory from Bangladesh for all those illegal Bangladeshis settled in India. After all, Partition was for those Muslims who could not bear to live with Hindus. And yet if Muslims have returned to live with Hindus, then the territory of Bangladesh should be reduced in proportion to millions of Bangladesis that have come to India and the Hindus pushed out since 1947. Strategically, northern one-third of Bangladesh above the line drawn from Khulna to Sylhet could then be annexed if Bangladesh does not take back its people.

The fourth lesson to learn is that more than the overt threat of the terrorists in India, the more sinister corrosion of our nation state occurs from within. This corrosion provides ‘a force multiplier’ to the terrorists. That is, the terrorists are able to leverage the influence of highly placed individuals in the government, media and academic, who have been compromised by the terrorists and blackmailed on sex, drug money and illegitimate favors, into collaborating with them. Take for example the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi. He had been the Prime Minister, and the LTTE killed him because it claimed that he had to be punished for sending the IPKF to Sri Lanka. The dispatch of the Indian army was a government policy ratified by Parliament, and yet the LTTE arrogated to itself the right to hold Rajiv Gandhi responsible and to be murdered for it. In other words, the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi was a challenge to India’s sovereignty and self- respect itself, that a foreign terrorist organization can decide to kill because it does not like a policy of the government of India. Incidentally, the LTTE was a party to the decision to send the IPKF, but found soon enough the Indian army was not going to do the LTTE’s dirty work and hand over a Eelam to them on a platter. So they turned against India. So, it was perfidy too.

But instead of revulsion against the LTTE that any Indian patriot in government, media or academia would feel, we find that there are political parties, such as the DMK, PMK and MDMk which have no shame in stating that Rajiv Gandhi deserved to die. More surprisingly, the widow of Rajiv Gandhi, Ms. Sonia Gandhi finds nothing wrong with having political alliance with these parties which praise the killers of her husband. Furthermore, Ms. Gandhi wrote to the President that the four LTTE/DK criminals to be hanged on the orders of the Supreme Court (delivered on May 12, 1999), should be given a lesser sentence of life imprisonment even though the four criminals did not ask for mercy !! Is this her concept of zero tolerance for terrorism, or is there some mysterious reason why Ms. Gandhi wrote this letter ? And why is it that ever since the assassination till today Ms. Gandhi has not written a single letter to the President or raised in Lok Sabha demanding the immediate extradition of the LTTE supreme and Accused No.1 in the Rajiv murder case, V. Prabhakaran, or even carpet bombing of his hideout in Mullaitheevu or wherever in Sri Lanka ? Even the media and the academia does not write op-ed pages demanding action. Why does not the media raise the question of alliance of Congress with pro-LTTE parties with her ? What is behind this conspiracy of silence ?

One thing is for sure-terrorists in India of all hues and background have their compromised moles in the India’s Establishment, and hence no anti-terrorist policy can succeed unless these fifth column elements are weeded out. The IB/RAW/MI/CRPF all have files on them and so identifying them is no problem. The political support these traitors have to be withdrawn and some have to be made an example of. Hence, these four lessons are the core of a new strategy for deterring terrorism in India.

Dr. Subramaniam Swamy

SALUTE to  Denmark … They are trying to fix a huge problem. This could very well happen here on our Continent… Susan MacAllen, a Canadian citizen, is a contributing editor for (FamilySecurityMatters.org) Salute the Danish Flag – it’s a Symbol of   Western Freedom By Susan MacAllen In 1978-9, I was living and studying in Denmark. But in 1978, even in Copenhagen, one didn’t see Muslim immigrants. The Danish population embraced visitors, celebrated the exotic, went out of its way to protect each of its citizens. It was proud of its new  brand of socialist liberalism one in development since the conservatives had  lost power in 1929 – a system where no worker had to struggle to survive,  where one ultimately could count upon the state as in, perhaps, no other  western nation at the time. The rest of Europe saw the Scandinavians as free-thinking, progressive and infinitely generous in their welfare policies. Denmark boasted low crime rates, devotion to the environment, a superior educational system and a history of humanitarianism. Denmark was also most generous in its immigration policies – it offered the best welcome in Europe to the new immigrant: generous welfare payments from first arrival plus additional perks in transportation, housing and education. It was determined to set a world example for inclusiveness and multi-culturalism.  How could it have predicted that one day in 2005 a series of political cartoons in a newspaper would spark violence that would leave dozens dead in  the streets – all because its commitment to multiculturalism would come back  to bite? By the 1990s the growing urban Muslim population was obvious – and   its unwillingness to integrate into Danish society was obvious.  Years of immigrants had settled into Muslim-exclusive enclaves. As the Muslim leadership became more vocal about what they considered the decadence of Denmarks’ liberal way of life, the Danes – once so welcoming – began to feel slighted. Many Danes had begun to see Islam as incompatible with their long-standing values: belief in personal liberty and free speech, inequality for women, intolerance for other ethnic groups, and a deep pride in Danish heritage and history. An article by Daniel Pipes and Lars  Hedegaard, in which they forecast, accurately, that the growing im-migrant problem in Denmark would explode. In the article they reported: ‘Muslim immigrants constitute 5 percent of the population but consume upwards of 40 percent of the welfare spending.     ‘Muslims are only 4 percent of Denmarks’ 5.4 million people but make  up a majority of the countrys’ convicted rapists, an especially combustible issue given that practically all the female victims are non-Muslims. Similar, if lesser, disproportions are found in other crimes.’ ‘Over time, as Muslim immigrants increase in numbers, they wish less to mix with the indigenous population.  A recent survey finds that only 5 percent of young Muslim immigrants would readily marry a Dane.’ ‘Forced marriages – promising a newborn daughter in Denmark to a male cousin in the home country, then compelling her to marry him, sometimes on pain of death – are one problem.’ ‘Muslim leaders openly declare their goal of introducing Islamic law once Denmarks’ Muslim population grows large enough – a not-that-remote prospect. If present trends persist, one sociologist estimates, every third inhabitant of Denmark in 40 years will be Muslim.’ It is easy to understand why a growing number of Danes would feel that   Muslim immigrants show little respect for Danish values and laws.   An example is the phenomenon common to other European countries and   Canada: some Muslims in Denmark who opted to leave the Muslim faith have been murdered in the name of Islam, while others hide in fear for their lives. Jews are also threatened and harassed openly by Muslim leaders in Denmark, a country where once Christian citizens worked to smuggle out nearly all of their 7,000 Jews by night to Sweden – before the Nazis could invade. I think of my Danish friend Elsa – who, as a teenager, had dreaded crossing the street to the bakery every morning under the eyes of occupying Nazi soldiers – and I wonder what she would say today. In 2001, Denmark elected the most conservative government in some 70 years – one that had some decidedly non-generous ideas about liberal unfettered immigration. Today, Denmark has the strictest immigration policies in Europe. Its effort to protect itself has been met with accusations of  ‘racism’ by liberal media across Europe – even as other governments struggle to right the social problems wrought by years of too-lax immigration. If you wish to become Danish, you must attend three years of language classes. You must pass a test on Denmarks’ history, culture and a Danish language test. You must live in Denmark for 7 years before applying for citizenship. You must demonstrate an intent to work, and have a job waiting. If you wish to bring a spouse into Denmark, you must both be over 24 years of age, and you won’t find it so easy anymore to move your friends and family to   Denmark with you. You will not be allowed to build a mosque in Copenhagen. Although your children have a choice of some 30 Arabic culture and language schools in Denmark, they will be strongly encouraged to assimilate to Danish society   in ways that past immigrants weren’t. In 2006, the Danish minister for employment, Claus Hjort Frederiksen,  spoke publicly of the burden of Muslim immigrants on the Danish welfare  system, and it was horrifying: the governments’ welfare committee had  calculated that if immigration from Third World countries were blocked, 75  percent of the cuts needed to sustain the huge welfare system in coming decades would be unnecessary. In other words, the welfare system, as it existed, was being exploited by immigrants to the point of eventually bankrupting the government.  ‘We are simply forced to adopt a new policy on immigration.’ ‘The calculations of the welfare committee are terrifying and show how unsuccessful the integration of immigrants has been up to now,’ he said. A large thorn in the side of Denmarks’ imams is the Minister of Immigration and Integration, Rikke Hvilshoj. She makes no bones about the  new policy toward immigration, ‘The number of foreigners coming to the  country makes a difference,’ Hvilshoj says, ‘There is an inverse correlation between how many come here and how well we can receive the foreigners that  come.’ And on Muslim immigrants needing to demonstrate a willingness to blend in, ‘In my view, Denmark should be a country with room for different cultures and religions. Some values, however, are more important than others. We refuse to question democracy, equal rights and freedom of speech.’ Hvilshoj has paid a price for her show of backbone. Perhaps to test her resolve, the leading radical imam in Denmark, Ahmed Abdel Raman Abu  Alban, demanded that the government pay blood money to the family of a  Muslim who was murdered in a suburb of Copenhagen, stating that the familys’  thirst for revenge could be thwarted for money. When Hvilshoj dismissed his demand, he argued that in Muslim culture the payment of retribution money  was common, to which Hvilshoj replied that what is done in a Muslim country is not  necessarily what is done in Denmark.  The Muslim reply came soon after: her house was torched while she, her husband and children slept. All managed to escape unharmed, but she and her family were moved to a secret location and she and other ministers were assigned bodyguards for the first time – in a country where such murderous violence was once so scarce. Her government has slid to the right, and her borders have tightened. Many believe that what happens in the next decade will determine whether Denmark survives as a bastion of good living, humane thinking and social responsibility, or whether it becomes a nation at civil war with supporters of Sharia law. And meanwhile, Canadians clamor for stricter immigration policies, and demand an end to state welfare programs that allow many immigrants to live on the public dole. As we in Canada look at the enclaves of Muslims amongst  us, and see  those who enter our shores too easily, dare live on our taxes, yet refuse to embrace our culture, respect our traditions, participate in  our legal system, obey our laws, speak our language, appreciate our history.  We would do well to look to Denmark, and say a prayer for her future and for our own. If you agree this article has value, then please pass it on. SOME TRUTH ABOUT THE RELIGION OF MUHAMMAD CALLED ISLAM. . . . DIRECT FROM THE HOLY BOOK!!!

An Ebook on Muhammad’s Qur’an

Compiled by Robert Spencer

☻Allah will throw fear into the hearts of the disbelievers, and smite their necks and fingers. (Original: إِذْ يُوحِي رَبُّكَ إِلَى الْمَلآئِكَةِ أَنِّي مَعَكُمْ فَثَبِّتُواْ الَّذِينَآمَنُواْسَأُلْقِي

فِي قُلُوبِ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُواْ الرَّعْبَ فَاضْرِبُواْ فَوْقَالأَعْنَاقِ وَاضْرِبُواْ مِنْهُمْ كُلَّ بَنَانٍ ) — The Qur’an (القرآن), Sura 8:12

☻The fires of hell will be fueled with the bodies of idolators and unbelievers. They will experience an ever-greater torment. (Original: وَأَمَّا الْقَاسِطُونَ فَكَانُوا لِجَهَنَّمَ حَطَباً وَأَلَّوِ اسْتَقَامُوا عَلَى الطَّرِيقَةِ لَأَسْقَيْنَاهُم مَّاء غَدَقاً لِنَفْتِنَهُمْفِيهِ وَمَن يُعْرِضْ عَن ذِكْرِ رَبِّهِ يَسْلُكْهُ عَذَاباً صَعَداً) — The Qur’an (القرآن), Sura 72:15-17

☻Smite the necks of the disbelievers whenever you fight against them. Those who die fighting for Allah will be rewarded. (Original: فَإِذا لَقِيتُمُ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا فَضَرْبَالرِّقَابِ حَتَّىإِذَا أَثْخَنتُمُوهُمْ فَشُدُّوا الْوَثَاقَ فَإِمَّا مَنّاً بَعْدُ وَإِمَّافِدَاء حَتَّى تَضَعَ الْحَرْبُأَوْزَارَهَا ذَلِكَ وَلَوْ يَشَاءُ اللَّهُ لَانتَصَرَ مِنْهُمْ وَلَكِن لِّيَبْلُوَبَعْضَكُمبِبَعْضٍ وَالَّذِينَ قُتِلُوا فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ فَلَن يُضِلَّ أَعْمَالَهُمْ) — The Qur’an (القرآن), Sura 47:4

☻Those who conceal Allah.s revelations in the Book, and purchase for them a miserable profit,- they swallow into themselves naught but Fire; Allah will not address them on the Day of Resurrection. Nor purify them: Grievous will be their penalty. (Original: إِنَّ الَّذِينَ يَكْتُمُونَ مَا أَنزَلَ اللّهُ مِنَالْكِتَابِ وَيَشْتَرُونَ بِهِ ثَمَناً قَلِيلاً أُولَـئِكَ مَا يَأْكُلُونَفِي بُطُونِهِمْ إِلاَّ النَّارَ وَلاَ يُكَلِّمُهُمُ اللّهُ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِوَلاَ يُزَكِّيهِمْ وَلَهُمْ عَذَابٌ أَلِيمٌ) — The Qur’an (القرآن), Sura 2:174

☻O ye who believe! the law of equality is prescribed to you in cases of murder: the free for the free, the slave for the slave, the woman for the woman. But if any remission is made by the brother of the slain, then grant any reasonable demand, and compensate him with handsome gratitude, this is a concession and a Mercy from your Lord. After this whoever exceeds the limits shall be in grave penalty. (Original: يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُواْكُتِبَعَلَيْكُمُ الْقِصَاصُ فِي الْقَتْلَى الْحُرُّ بِالْحُرِّ وَالْعَبْدُ بِالْعَبْدِوَالأُنثَىبِالأُنثَى فَمَنْ عُفِيَ لَهُ مِنْ أَخِيهِ شَيْءٌ فَاتِّبَاعٌ بِالْمَعْرُوفِوَأَدَاءإِلَيْهِ بِإِحْسَانٍ ذَلِكَ تَخْفِيفٌ مِّن رَّبِّكُمْ وَرَحْمَةٌ فَمَنِ اعْتَدَىبَعْدَ ذَلِكَ فَلَهُ عَذَابٌ أَلِيمٌ) — The Qur’an (القرآن), Sura 2:178

☻Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not. (Original: كُتِبَ عَلَيْكُمُ الْقِتَالُ وَهُوَ كُرْهٌ لَّكُمْ وَعَسَى أَن تَكْرَهُواْشَيْئاً وَهُوَ خَيْرٌ لَّكُمْ وَعَسَى أَن تُحِبُّواْ شَيْئاً وَهُوَ شَرٌّ لَّكُمْوَاللّهُ يَعْلَمُ وَأَنتُمْ لاَ تَعْلَمُونَ) — The Qur’an (القرآن), Sura 2:216

☻Do not marry unbelieving women (idolaters), until they believe: A slave woman who believes is better than an unbelieving woman, even though she allures you. Nor marry (your girls) to unbelievers until they believe: A man slave who believes is better than an unbeliever, even though he allures you. Unbelievers do (but) beckon you to the Fire. But Allah beckons by His Grace to the Garden (of bliss) and forgiveness, and makes His Signs clear to mankind: That they may celebrate His praise. (Original: وَلاَ تَنكِحُواْ الْمُشْرِكَاتِ حَتَّى يُؤْمِنَّ وَلأَمَةٌ مُّؤْمِنَةٌ خَيْرٌمِّن مُّشْرِكَةٍ وَلَوْ أَعْجَبَتْكُمْ وَلاَ تُنكِحُواْ الْمُشِرِكِينَ حَتَّىيُؤْمِنُواْ وَلَعَبْدٌ مُّؤْمِنٌ خَيْرٌ مِّن مُّشْرِكٍ وَلَوْ أَعْجَبَكُمْأُوْلَـئِكَيَدْعُونَ إِلَى النَّارِ وَاللّهُ يَدْعُوَ إِلَى الْجَنَّةِ وَالْمَغْفِرَةِبِإِذْنِهِوَيُبَيِّنُ آيَاتِهِ لِلنَّاسِ لَعَلَّهُمْ يَتَذَكَّرُونَ) — The Qur’an (القرآن), Sura 2:221

☻Some of them believed, and some of them averted their faces from him: And enough is Hell for a burning fire. (Original: فَمِنْهُم مَّنْ آمَنَ بِهِ وَمِنْهُم مَّن صَدَّ عَنْهُ وَكَفَى بِجَهَنَّمَسَعِيراً) — The Qur’an (القرآن), Sura 4:55

☻Those who reject our Signs, We shall soon cast into the Fire: as often as their skins are roasted through, We shall change them for fresh skins, that they may taste the penalty: for Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise. (Original: إِنَّ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُواْ بِآيَاتِنَا سَوْفَ نُصْلِيهِمْ نَاراً كُلَّمَانَضِجَتْجُلُودُهُمْ بَدَّلْنَاهُمْ جُلُوداً غَيْرَهَا لِيَذُوقُواْ الْعَذَابَ إِنَّاللّهَكَانَ عَزِيزاً حَكِيماً — The Qur’an (القرآن), Sura 4:56

☻They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks; (Original: وَدُّواْلَوْتَكْفُرُونَ كَمَا كَفَرُواْ فَتَكُونُونَ سَوَاء فَلاَ تَتَّخِذُواْ مِنْهُمْأَوْلِيَاءحَتَّىَ يُهَاجِرُواْ فِي سَبِيلِ اللّهِ فَإِن تَوَلَّوْاْ فَخُذُوهُمْ وَاقْتُلُوهُمْحَيْثُ وَجَدتَّمُوهُمْ وَلاَ تَتَّخِذُواْ مِنْهُمْ وَلِيّاً وَلاَ نَصِيراً) — The Qur’an (القرآن), Sura 4:89

☻Allah has stirred up enmity and hatred among Christians. (Original: وَمِنَ الَّذِينَ قَالُواْ إِنَّا نَصَارَى أَخَذْنَا مِيثَاقَهُمْفَنَسُواْ حَظّاً مِّمَّا ذُكِّرُواْ بِهِ فَأَغْرَيْنَا بَيْنَهُمُ الْعَدَاوَةَوَالْبَغْضَاء إِلَى يَوْمِ الْقِيَامَةِ وَسَوْفَ يُنَبِّئُهُمُ اللّهُبِمَا كَانُواْ يَصْنَعُونَ) — The Qur’an (القرآن), Sura 5:14

☻Christians are disbelievers for believing in the divinity of Christ. (Original:

INDIAN AMERICAN INTELLECTUALS FORUM
Tel. (718)  478-5735/(718) 271-0453
Katarian@aol.com

Reasons why Islam needs to be declared illegal in the non-Muslim countries

 

How America could Save a Lot of Money and Freedom

A Suggestion

 

I suggest that America fight the Islamic terrorism by addressing the root cause of the terrorism – Islam – by large scale educational and social programs, and make America free from Islam in 25-50 years by non-violent and civil means.

 

Compared to the current two wars, this will cost a lot less and no lives, and reduce the possibility of future wars like our current wars. The greatest benefit would be that America will maintain its freedom and culture without any fear of Islam taking over the country. Below I am describing why and how.

 

Please ponder over the suggestion and ideas I shared here after reading this whole document. If you like it, please share it with all kafir Americans you know. If you do not like it, or do not believe in what I said, please do not trash it, but send it to those who possibly could use it, and let them decide if to trash it or not.

 

We must give up talking only the “politically correct” because then we are not talking the truth and facts. That makes it impossible to figure effective solutions to our problems, and it deludes others from the reality.

 

I have no doubt about the great value of this suggestion.

 

The 9/11 event has shown that America is vulnerable to Islam. While the Islamic terrorists attack from within and without USA, the so called moderate American Muslims also exploit the loop holes – deficiencies – in our legal system to promote or spread Islam or protect interests of the terrorists and Islam within USA.

 

Islam is not tolerant of any other faith. Islam/Koran does not approve any democratic government. All the Muslims have alliance with only the Islam, not with the country they live in or are born in. Koran teaches them to lie with the kafirs in order to serve Islam interests. This is called taquia in Koran.  The so called moderate Muslims sooner or later are the beneficiaries of the Islamic terrorism acts. They gradually attain political power to push a kafir country under Islam. There is no separation of church and state in Islam. The five attachments to this document are in support of what I am saying.

 

I am sure the Homeland Security Dept, FBI, and CIA are spending a lot of effort and $s to keep an eye on many so called moderates in USA and abroad. This money and efforts could be saved by enacting proper laws. The screening at the airports could also become easy and less costly.

 

Additionally, we are fighting two wars, but we are fighting the symptoms of Islamic terrorism. America’s war efforts are not addressing the root cause of the terrorism – Islam. We need to fight this ideology by large scale educational and social programs. I am very confident that any kafir country can purge out Islam in 25-50 years. The cost of the social and educational programs will be a lot less than the cost of wars we are fighting, and we will save a lot of war expenses in future as there will be less need for such wars.

—

 

Religions and Religious Freedom

A Rational Discussion to understand the Truth

 

There is a flow in the law and there is some misunderstanding. Let me explain it.

 

At this time the world has a small number of religions, and the major religions are: Christianity, Islam, Hindu, and Buddhism. The followers of no religion, except the Hindus, say that all religions are same.

 

[(Most Hindus think that “all religions are same” out of misunderstanding of a line in the Vedas that says all paths lead to the same god. They forget that when the Vedas said it (in the beginning of creation) there was only one religion – the Vedic dharma – in the world. This Vedic dharma gives a number of yogas – processes of realizing god or going to god and experience bliss.  All these Vedic paths lead to the same god. Therefore the words “all paths” of the Vedas do not include Islam and Christianity, or Semitic religions.]

 

When one understands that all religions are different from each other, then one may ask – which religion is good, better, or best? This question immediately raises another question – how you figure if a religion is better than another religion? Here is how you could figure it:

 

A religion is better than another religion when:

 

1. It gives more freedom of thought, speech and action. Islam does not give freedom.

 

1. It is tolerant of all the tolerant religions. An intolerant religion is one that that does not accept the existence of any competing faith, and makes organized efforts to convert the infidels. (Islam is not tolerant. Tolerating intolerant is encouraging intolerance.)

 

1. Its practice does not take away, or curtail, or limit the freedom, lives, lands, or property, pursuit for happiness, or dignity and honor of the followers of other tolerant religions. (Islam tells to convert the kafirs or kill them if they refuse to accept Islam.)

 

1. Its practice is eco friendly and harmonious with nature.

 

1. It does not encourage animal killings for fun. (Islam does not prohibit animal killing.)

 

1. Its practice makes one compassionate to other living beings. (Islam does not teach compassion.)

 

1. People accept it by free choice without any force, pressure or enticement for conversion. (Islam spreads only by force on their many children, wives, and others. There is hardly any case where one willingly accepts Islam.)

 

1. Its followers do not go out to convert anyone. They preach only to those who have friendly and non-envious interest to know it.

 

1. It is more scientific or logical than another religion. (There is nothing scientific in Koran.)

 

1. It does not say, “Follow this religion, or you will go to hell.”

 

1. It does not say, “Kill those who quit this religion.” (Islam says so.)

 

1. It does not say, “Women cannot go to heaven.” (Islam says so.)

 

1. It does not say one race or sex is superior to another. (Koran says that only the Islam is true religion.)

 

1. It is for all the humans of all the time. It is not exclusive for a particular race, or country or group. (Islam spreads barbaric Arab imperialism.)

 

1. It says that any human is free to follow any process of the religion and achieve its final destination or goal. Islam does not say it. (Koran says that if one quits Islam, he/she must be killed.)

 

1. It does not approve slavery, sex out of marriage, gambling, or intoxication. (Islam approves sex out of marriage. It allows very temporary marriage for sex.)

 

1. Its practice helps in achieving peace at any level. It has more likelihood of achieving peace. (Islam’s whole 1400 year bloody history shows that wherever Islam goes – mostly by force – peace goes away.)

 

With the above criteria one could compare religion A with religion B. Then a better of the two religions could be compared with religion C, and so forth. Using this process you will find that some religions are not good, and at least one – Islam – is really worst or barbaric.

 

You have to know about a religion only by its Book, and from its well recognized authorities, and staunch followers. Every religion has more or less followers who do not know their own religion correctly, or they malpractice it. So, the religion is what is stated in its authorized Book.

 

Now, most democratic counties at this time (except Hamas perhaps) give freedom of religion. They say, “Anyone can follow any religion. All religions are legal. Government does not prefer one religion over another.” This law basically says that you could follow a good religion or a bad religion.

 

Now think. Is it rational, or safe, to say that you living in a democratic country could follow a religion that says: “Any democratic government is illegal and must be replaced; or, you kill the followers of other religions, and doing so you will go heaven; or, accept this religion, or else you will go to hell or will be killed; or, no woman could go out of home without fully covering her body from head to toe; or, no woman could go to schools, etc.? It certainly is not rational.

 

Therefore, the law or constitution needs to be amended to say that any intolerant religion is illegal. If you are living in a democracy, and not following a barbaric religion, and your country’s majority people are not following a barbaric religion, then please tell the majority to unite and change the law or constitution as soon as possible before the barbarians could take over your country.

 

No democratic constitution should allow a barbaric and intolerant or anti-democracy religion. The kafir Americans (who are majority at this time) do not want to see America converted into a Muslim country. They do not want Islamic Sharia law (that says you are guilty when accused) in America.

 

Keep in mind the alarming fact that the kafir population growth rate in USA and Europe is very less (one fourth) compared to Muslim growth rate; and democracy is a game of number of votes. Once Islam take over by vote, the democracy will vanish and Sharia will take over.

 

Therefore, Islam needs to be declared illegal. Most Americans will reject this idea saying that the constitution provides freedom of religion. This is because they have not analyzed the issue thoroughly. I already explained above that Islam is not worthy of freedom in America. Below is more rationale.

When the forefathers of America drafted the constitution, they did not have slightest idea that Islam could be a threat to USA. They thought all religions are good, and now we know that it is not true. Therefore, we need to amend the constitution declaring Islam illegal. “The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people; it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government.” – Alexander Hamilton, Aug 28, 1794

Additionally, all the Muslim countries have all the religions illegal, except Islam. You cannot pray to Jesus in Saudi Arabia e.g. Therefore, all the kafir countries and USA should have no problem – i.e. no other country will complain or criticize – in declaring Islam illegal. It has to be done soon by grass root united action. “We (the kafirs) must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.” – Benjamin Franklin, July 4, 1776

 

Attachments:

1. Quotes from Koran_1
2. I am a Muslim woman
3. Helpless destiny in Islam
4. This is chilling…
5. IBD Editorials: Al-Qaida Now Poses Inner Threat

 

—

BBC News: Pakistan on strike against bill to amend blasphemy law

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-12101356

—

Muslim Demographics

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-3X5hIFXYU

—

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/5994047/Muslim-Europe-the-demographic-time-bomb-transforming-our-continent.html

—

दिनांक १८-६-२०११

मेरे भारतीय मुसलमान  भाइयों ,
प्रणाम!

बाबा श्री रामदेव जी भारतमे – हिंदुस्तान में –  भ्रष्टाचार मिटाने का आन्दोलन कर रहे है,
और में देखता हु की मुसलमान अग्रणी लोग ये आन्दोलानमे बाबाजी को साथ दे रहे है.

जब भारतीयों का  अंगरेजो से आज़ादी का आन्दोलन १९४७ पहले चल रहा था  तब भी हुन्दुस्तानके मुसल्मानोने उसमे साथ दिया था. परन्तु जब आज़ादी मिली तब मुसलमान हुन्दुओके दुश्मन बने, और देश का कटवारा किया, और पाकिस्तान का जन्म हुवा. बहुमति हुन्दुओ के विरुद्ध गाँधी मुसलमानों का पक्ष लेते रहे, फिर भी मुसलमानों ने उनका माना नहीं और देशको कटवाया,
और सरहद पर एक दुश्मन देशको बनाया.

तो मुसंमानो के ये सहकार से देशको बहुत नुकसान हुवा.

इस  बार जब हुन्दुस्तान के लघुमति मुसलमान बहुमति हिन्दुओको – बाबा रामदेवजी के आन्दोलन को – साथ दे रहे है, तो में आपसे और भगवन से प्रार्थना करता हु की जब आन्दोलन  सफल होवे तब कोई झगडा शुरू न करना.

ये भ्रष्टाचार मिटने का आन्दोलन सदाचार फैलाने का आन्दोलन है. आतंकवाद भी एक भ्रष्टाचार है. सारी दुनियाने १४०० साल से देखा है, और खास कर के ९/११ घटने बाद देखा है की ज्यादातर सब आतंक  मुसलमानों से आता है.  और हुन्दुस्तान में जो कोमी दंगे हुवे हेई वे सब मुसलमानों ने ही शुरू किये है.

तो ये  हुन्द्स्तान के हन्दू – मुसलमान का झगडा कायम के लिए मिटाने  का जो रास्ता है वो में कहता हु. जब हिंदुस्तान के सब मुसलमान इस्लाम धर्मं छोड़ दे तो हुन्दुस्तान में परम शान्ति आ सकती है. हिन्दुस्तानके    मुसलमानों को इस्लाम किसलिए छोड़ने की जरुरत है वो कहता हु – किस कारणों से इस्लाम छोड़ना चाहिए वो कहता हु :

1. हिंदुस्तान हजारो सालो से हिन्दुओ  का देश है. इस्लाम धर्म वहा हैदा नहीं हुवा  है. इस्लाम रेगिस्तान में पैदा हुवा है. हन्दू धर्म – सनातन धर्म – वेदोका धर्मं हिंदुस्तान में पैदा हुवा है.
2. हिन्दुस्तानमे इस्लाम को किसीने बुलाया नहीं है. इस्लाम वहां जबरदस्ती घुसा हुवा है. १००० सालो से इस्लामी आक्रामको ने हिन्दुओ का और उनके मंदिरोका बहुत नाश किया है, ये सब इतिहास बताता है. जो बिना बुलाये घुसे  उसको देशमे रहने का कोई हक़ नहीं होता है. इसलिए इस्लाम धर्म को हुन्दुस्तान में रहनेका  कोई हक़ नहीं है.
3. कुछ सदियों पहले आप सब मुसल्मानोके  पूर्वज हिन्दू थे जिनको  तलवारके जोर से जबरदस्ती मुस्लमान बनाया गया था. अपनी जान बचाने के लिए वो मुसलमान बने. इस्लामी आतंक का वो शिकार बने. तो आप अपने हिन्दू पूर्वजो  को स्वर्गमे  शांति देनेके लिए इस्लाम छोड़ दो. इस्लाम छोड़ कर आप भारतमे जन्मे कोई भी धर्म ले सकता है, अथवा नास्तिक भी रह शकते है. पर ख्रिस्ती नहीं  बनना क्यों की वो धर्म हुन्दुस्तान की पैदाश नहीं है.
4. इस्लाम धर्म कुरान से और हडिथ से आता है. इस्लाम लोकतंत्र स्वर्राज से विरुद्ध है. भारतमे लोक तंत्र स्वराज -Democracy – है. इस लिए कोई  भी स्वराज लोकतंत्र वाले  देश में इस्लाम को रहने का कोई हक़ नहीं देना चाहिए.
5. कुरान बताती है की इस्लाम धर्मं सहिष्णु नहीं है. कुरान कहती है की काफिरों को तलवार बताकर  मुस्लमान करो, और वो यदि इस्लाम का इनकार करे तो उनको मार डालो. इसी ही  कारणसे मुसलमान  लोग जिहाद करते है. इसी कारणसे देशको काटा गया है. हिन्दुओ की गीता कहती है की किसीको भी जबरदस्ती हिन्दू न बनाए. जो हिन्दू धर्म के बारेमे प्रेमसे जानना चाहता हे, केवल उनको ही धर्म के बारेमे  कहे.

बस तो ये बात सोचो और समजो . आप हुन्द्स्तान में पैदा हुवे  है, आप हिन्दुकी संतान है, इस्लाम हिंदुस्तान की पैदाश नहीं है, इस्लाम सब धर्मो  का दुश्मन है. इस्लाम छोड़ दो.
हिन्दू बनो या न बनो, कोई बात नहीं  है, परन्तु ये ज़हरीला घुसाहुवा इस्लाम छोड़ दो.
हिंदुस्तान में बहुत शांति आएगी.
जय भारत!
जय श्री कृष्ण !
-सुरेश व्यास

I am a Muslim woman

By Agniveer (http://agniveer.com/author/admin/)  on May 22, 2010

Hello there! If you are new here, you might want to subscribe to the RSS feed for updates on this topic.

For this post, I am simply publishing the already published confessions of a Muslim woman. Please visit http://homa. org for complete set of articles. Many of the articles contain excerpts from Islamic laws that are too vulgar to be discussed. So discretion is advised.

I Am a Moslem Woman – Parvin Darabi

I am a Moslem woman. I have no face. I have no identity. At age 9, based on lunar year (a lunar year is ten days shorter) I am considered an adult. Being an adult means that I have to adhere with Islamic laws as stated below.

I have to pray five times a day, fast one month out of the year and cover myself from head to toe in yards of black fabric. I am eligible to be married and can be punished for any wrong doing. I can be incarcerated and, if needed, executed for my crimes, even political ones.

Islam’s law – that Allah sent down to his messenger Muhammad – came to announce that women (exactly like men) are full human beings. Women (like men) are therefore required to follow the way appointed by Allah.

“A woman (like a man) is therefore obligated with all three degrees of this religion: Islam (outward submission to Allah), iman (inward faith in Allah), and ihsan (perfection of worship of Allah)”.

“Women have such honorable rights as obligations, but men have a (single) degree above them”. The Koran 2:228

“Men are the managers of the affairs of women because Allah has preferred men over women and women were expended of their Rights”. The Koran 4:34

Islam believes and promotes only one relationship between male and female and that is the relation of lust.

“If a man and a woman are alone in one place, the third person present is the devil”. Prophet Mohammed

I am not allowed to swim, ski, ride a bike, dance, learn to play musical instruments, practice gymnastics, or any other sport. I am not even permitted to watch men play sports, either in the stadium and/or on television.

I am not permitted to participate in Olympic games.

From age 7, I am segregated from all males in and out of my extended family.

My father, grandfather, uncles, brothers or my male cousins are not allowed to be present at any ceremonies for my accomplishments. They will not be allowed to participate in my birthday parties.

I have to study under female teachers and professors. However, since women of prior generations were not allowed to go to school, there are not that many qualified women teachers and professors. Male professors must teach me from behind a wall.

I am to be treated by female doctors. Go to female dentists. And if there are none, then I have to go without or I must be examined through some sort of divider.

I am not allowed to practice birth control or have abortions, even if carrying or having a child means I have to die.

My worth is based on the Islamic Laws of Retribution, 24th edition, December 1982, as half of a man. It doesn’t matter who I am, how educated I am, and what earning potential I may have in my life. My worth is half of a man, any man.

According to clauses 33 and 91 of the law in respect, Qasas (The Islamic Retribution Bill) and its boundaries, the value of woman is considered only half as much as the value of a man.

Article 1: dieh or blood money paid to the victim or next of kin for as compensation for bodily injury or murder of a relative.

The Islamic Law of Retribution

In the old Islamic laws, recently placed into practice by the Islamic Republic of Iran, the worth of a man’s life is equal to the market value of 100 camels or 200 cows and that of a woman is equal to half of the man’s, 50 camels or 100 cows.

The clause number 6 regarding the dieh (cash value of the fine) states that the cash fine for murdering a woman intentionally or unintentionally is half as much as for a man. The same clause adds that if a man intentionally murders a woman and the guardian of the woman himself is not able to pay half of the Dieh (the value of 50 camels or 100 cows, the difference between the value of a man to that of a woman’s life) to the murderer, the murderer will be exempted from retribution.

New Legal Standing: Pursuant to article 85 of the constitution, the Islamic penal code article 300, blood money or dieh, a sum paid to the next of kin as compensation for the murder of a relative, is twice as much in the case of a murdered man as in the case of a woman. The number of witnesses required to prove a crime is higher if the witnesses are female. For example, article 237 of the penal code states that first degree murder must be proven by testimony of two just men and evidence for second-degree murder or manslaughter requires the testimony of two just men, or one just man and two just women, or of one just man and the accuser.

My testimony in a court of law is equal to half of that of a man. In most countries I don’t vote and I don’t get elected to office. And if I do, it does not mean much. I inherit only half as much as my male siblings.

I cannot get custody of my children. Even if their father dies. In the case of divorce or death I have to surrender my children to their father and/or his family.

I cannot travel, work, go to college, join organizations, even visit my friends and relatives without my father or husband’s permission.

I must live where my husband desires.

I am banned from studies such as engineering, agriculture, archaeology, restoration of the historic monuments and handicrafts, and many other fields. I am not allowed to become a judge.

Under the terms of Koranic law, any judge fulfilling the seven requirements (that he have reached puberty, be a believer, know the Koranic laws perfectly, be just, and not be affected by amnesia, or be a bastard, or be of the female sex) is qualified to dispense justice in any type of case.

I have no right to choose the clothing I wear in public. This is done by the Office of the Islamic Guidance which sets the color, the style, and the accessories for women and girls as young as 6 years of age.

I will get arrested, beaten, and sometimes even executed if I wear make-up, nylons, bright colors and specifically the color of red.

I cannot choose my mate and am not permitted to divorce him if things did not work out.

According to Khomeini, the Iranian Islamic Imam, “The most suitable time for a girl to get married is the time when the girl can have her first menstrual period in her husband’s house rather than her father’s”.

I have to meet all my husband’s desires including the sexual ones. And if I refuse he has the right to deny me food, shelter, and all of life’s necessities. I have to say yes every time he wants to have sex.

According to Hojatoleslam Imani, Religious Leader in Iran. “A woman should endure any violence or torture imposed on her by her husband for she is fully at his disposal. Without his permission she may not leave her house even for a good action (such as charitable work). Otherwise her prayers and devotions will not be accepted by God and curses of heaven and earth will fall upon her”.

My husband can divorce me without my knowledge and by the Islamic law he is required to support me for only 100 days. And if he dies, I am entitled to 1/8 of his Estate.

My husband can have four permanent wives and if he is from Shi’i sect, he can have as many temporary wives as he wants.

Koran says that “Men your wives are your tillage. Go into your tillage anyway you want”. This means that a man is allowed to sodomise his wife and she cannot complain.

In some countries they even mutilate, cut and sew my female sexual parts in order to control and regulate my sexual desire.

According to the Islamic Laws, I am supposed to be seen outside of my home three times in my life. When I am born, when I get married and when I die.

I have no explanation on why God denied me everything and made men in charge of me.

In Islam, the age of majority for a girl is 9 years and for a boy is 15 years. This means that a 9 year old girl and a 15 year old boy are considered to have the same level of maturity. Now, if girls reach maturity six years earlier than boys, then why did God place men in charge of women? Was there something wrong with God’s Judgment?

In some Islamic countries such as Iran, if I am arrested for wearing make-up, the guards will force me to clean my face with cotton balls rubbed in pieces of glass. This cuts my face. The barbaric revolutionary guard, while watching the blood run out of my flesh, will tell me, “next time you think about this and will not wear it”.

As a political prisoner I will be used as a concubine for the revolutionary guards. In case I am condemned to death I will not undergo the sentence as long as I am a virgin. Thus I will be systematically raped before the sentence is executed. Mullahs believe that virgin girls who die go to heaven but politically inclined girls are ungodly creatures and they do not deserve to go to heaven, therefore they are raped so that the Mullah’s can be sure that they indeed will be sent to hell.

In Islam, if a 6 or 7 year old girl is raped by an adult man, she will be the one that gets punished. It is her fault because she provoked it. The parents then will burn or kill her because she has dishonored the family.

It has been said that the Moslem Prophet got very upset one day noticing his wives flirting with men who visited him and ordered women to stay behind a dividing curtain when speaking with men. The idea of hijab, the covering up of women, became a law in Islamic countries from that day.

In 1991, the Prosecutor-General of Iran, declared that “anyone who rejects the principle of hijab is an apostate and the punishment for an apostate under Islamic law is death.”

Polygamy is legal in Islam. A man may marry “four Permanent” and as many “Provisional” or temporary wives as he desires.

“Marry such women as seem good to you, two, three, four; but if you fear you will not be equitable, then only one, or what your right hands own; so it is likelier you will not be partial”. The Koran 4:3

“Most Europeans have mistresses. Why should we suppress human instincts? A rooster satisfies several hens, an stallion several mares. A woman is unavailable during certain periods where as a man is always active….”, Ayatollah Ghomi, LE MONDE, January 20, 1979.

Also read:

Does God Hate Women

Islam and the Institution of Marriage

Woman and Islam

Addendum:

It’s a pity that such barbaric and dehumanizing treatment of women has forced the thoughtful and righteous women to adopt atheism and has filled their lives with hatred. All Muslim women should come back to their original Vedic Dharma, either alone or with their husbands to discover the true status that true God (not the Biblical or Quranic pervert) has accorded to them.

In Vedas:

a. Women are neither considered sensual objects nor jailed in hijab.

b. Women have same rights as those of men. In fact, owing to their critical responsibilities in shaping the future of society, they are given an edge over men in terms of rights.

c. Women are neither expected to be glam girls, nor expected to be dumb animals in prison. They are to be respected for their intellect, feminine qualities and their role in society that cannot be replicated by men.

d. Vedic ideology states that only those places prosper where women are given highest level of respect.

e. Vedas further state that men should not try to control the minds of women.

f. Rights for divorce are inclined favorably towards women.

g. Physical torture of women is a crime.

h. Women have equal social and political rights. Vedas say that all things being equal, women should be preferred for administrative roles.

i. Marriage of women until they have matured physically and mentally, and have completed their education is a sin.

j. Women have full rights to choose their husbands after completion of their education. They should not be forced to marry against their wishes by relatives.

So all women in the world, especially Muslim women, should show courage, reject their humiliating destiny and embrace Vedic Dharma to restore their dignity accorded rightfully by Ishwar.

A dignified Muslim woman is an oxymoron!

I welcome all Muslim women to assert their right to self-respect.

If you are married, convince your husband to convert away from Islam. He would do so if he indeed loves you. If not, prefer truth over blind affection that offers you no scope, and manage a divorce. That may be difficult in a Muslim country, but explore legal loopholes in case they do not follow Sharia too strictly. Or convince him to come to a non-Muslim country for a while and once out of Sharia clutches, assert your right to dignity.

If you are unmarried but plan to marry a Muslim man, make sure he is not already married. Investigate his background. And if indeed he is a genuine person who loves you deeply, ask him to embrace Hinduism. He would readily do so to gift you your self-respect and dignity. If not, swallow the hard pill, burn your past and look ahead in life. Thank Ishwar for saving you from being a victim of love jehad. Because once you marry a Muslim man, there are hardly any options for you to protect your self-respect and right to equality.

No person or object in the world is more important than self-respect and natural rights of equality among all humans regardless of gender or birth. So refuse to be a Muslim woman at any cost.

Related posts:

I am a Muslim wife/ concubine Read to know why you should decide to refuse accepting to be a Muslim wife or concubine. Must read if you plan to marry a Muslim. …

I want to marry a Muslim guy! Essential facts to know before you marry a Muslim guy! Must read for all women who are or who aspire to be a Muslim wife. Circulate if you find useful….

Islamic Women – Humans or Commodity? Read to know how Islam reduces women to commodity to satisfy lust of men? Read and liberate the true woman whom Vedas accords the highest status among all creations of God!…

Islam and Women Rights Read straight from Islamic scriptures on the status and respect for women!…

Arguments of Muslim fanatics Analysis of a few arguments that Muslim fanatics provide to claim that Islam alone is best!…

From: Brij Mohan Thapar
To: csshan

Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 11:24 AM

Subject: THE PROGRESS OF ISLAM IN A SOCIETY ( FROM 1% TO 100%) – ADAPTED FROM DR. PETER HAMMOND’S BOOK: SLAVERY, TERRORISM AND ISLAM: THE HISTORICAL ROOTS AND CONTEMPORARY THREAT

BHARATIYA  PRAGNA

APRIL, 2008

The Progress of Islam in a Society

(from 1% to 100%)

Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical roots and contemporary threat

The world has no place for non-Muslims. The ummah is one and must act as on – Quran 3.103.

 

Mohammed said “I have been commanded to fight until They testify that there is no God but Allah and I am His messenger” Quran 47-4.

When Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to any-one:

United States                                    Muslim     1%

Australia                                            Muslim     1.5%

Canada                                             Muslim     1.9%

China                                                Muslim      1% – 2%

Italy                                                   Muslim      1.5%

Norway                                             Muslim       1.8%

At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:

Denmark                                         Muslim        2%

Germany                                         Muslim        3.7%

United Kingdom                              Muslim        2.7%

Spain                                               Muslim        4%

Thailand                                          Muslim        4.6%

From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion in their percentage of the population.

They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves – along with threats for failure to comply. At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law.

France                                           Muslim        8%

Philippines                                     Muslim        5%

Sweden                                         Muslim        5%

Switzerland                                    Muslim        4.3%

The Netherlands                            Muslim        5.5%

Trinidad & Tobago                         Muslim        5.8%

When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions (Paris – car-burnings) . Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats (Amsterdam – Mohammed cartoons).

Guyana                                                Muslim        10%

India                                                     Muslim        13.4%

Israel                                                    Muslim        16%

Kenya                                                   Muslim        10%

Russia                                                  Muslim        10 – 15%

After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:

Ethiopia                                                Muslim        32.8%

At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:

Bosnia                                                 Muslim        40%

Chad                                                   Muslim        53.1

Lebanon                                              Muslim        59.7%

From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:

Albania                                                Muslim        70%

Malaysia                                              Muslim        60.4%

Qatar                                                   Muslim        77.5%

Sudan                                                  Muslim        70%

After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:

Bangladesh                                        Muslim        83%

Egypt                                                  Muslim        90%

Gaza                                                   Muslim        98.7%

Indonesia                                            Muslim        86.1%

Iran                                                     Muslim        98%

Iraq                                                     Muslim        97%

Jordan                                                Muslim        92%

Morocco                                              Muslim        98.7%

Pakistan                                              Muslim        97%

Palestine                                             Muslim        99%

Syria                                                    Muslim        90%

Tajikistan                                             Muslim        90%

Turkey                                                 Muslim        99.8%

United Arab Emirates                          Muslim        96%

100% will usher in the peace of “Dar-es-Salaam” – the Islamic House of Peace – there’s supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim:

Afghanistan                                        Muslim        100%

Saudi Arabia                                       Muslim        100%

Somalia                                               Muslim        100%

Yemen                                                 Muslim        99.9%

Of course, that’s not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons.

“Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world and all of us against the infidel.  – Leon Uris, “The Haj”.

It is good to remember that in many, many countries, such as France, the Muslim populations are centered around ghettos based on their ethnicity. Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. Therefore, they exercise more power than their national average would indicate.

Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat.

Helpless destiny in Islam

And the concept of destiny in the Vedas

By Agniveer on April 17, 2010

The concept of destiny or Taqdeer in Islam has certain very fundamental inconsistencies. Scholars have tried to explain it in various ways but reach an impasse somewhere in process. And then they simply have to escape by saying, “Allah knows the best!”

Fine! All agree that Allah knows the best. But if that would suffice, what is even the point of believing in rest of Quran or on anything in the world, for that matter. Why then even argue that Islam is best religion?

In this article, let us briefly evaluate some concepts regarding destiny in Quran and judge for ourselves if they stand the test of reason and rationality. And more importantly, can this concept leave any scope for a better future for anyone? We shall also then compare it with concept of destiny in Vedas.

Destiny in Islam

0. Islam believes that there is only one life and then we shall go to Hell or Heaven forever. There is no rebirth.

1. The Islamic belief is that whatever happens in world, good or bad, is due to will of Allah. Except Allah, nothing else, including soul is eternal and is merely a creation of Allah. Thus their existence and properties are determined by Allah. Allah may create a soul, decide its nature and also decide to destroy it.

2. Islam goes a step ahead from this belief and states that not only has Allah Miyan decided our fate from very inception, but He has also documented it in a book called “Lohe Mahfooz” that is kept under the throne of Allah. (The throne of Allah is over the water which is above the air.)

3. Thus Allah has already decided who will go to Hell and who will enjoy the virgins in Paradise. If that be so, whatever good or bad acts that humans do is due to will of Allah. Why then Allah punishes us for his bad intentions? This very concept makes Allah the greatest Kafir!

4. Surate Fatih states that no one is deviated from their paths, be those whom Allah gives gifts or those whom Allah tortures.

Tafseere Husaini details it further and states that those who are Kafirs became so because even before they were created, they had to face anger of Allah!

If Allah indeed has decided who will be Kafir, even before they were created, then what is the fault of Kafirs if they refuse to accept Islam?

Surate Bakr 7 explains it further: The Kafirs will not believe whether you scare them or not. Because Allah has put seal in their hearts and ears, and curtain over their eyes, and shall punish them severely. Tafseer-e-Jalalayn commentary on Islam explains it further by stating that many like Abu Zahal are destined by fate to be Kafir.

Thus if someone is a Kafir, he or she is not the culprit. The real culprit is Allah himself who decided Kufra for them even before their creation!

Thus the Islamic Allah cannot be just and honest, if this modern Quran is indeed true.

5. The next Ayat of Surate Bakr writes that Allah has increase the disease of their hearts. Tafseer-e-Jalalyn explains: Allah increased their disease in a way that these Kafirs went against the message that Allah brought down on earth.

Mujihul Quran explains this disease further: One pain that they suffered was that they were forced to believe what they did not want to believe. The second pain was that they had to forcibly fight in Jehad battles.

This also amply proves that the religion of peace was actually spread by sword and force, by will of Allah. Not to say about Allah being the cause of all evil!

6. Surate Bakr 86 states that Allah decides by his grace whom he shall love. Tafseer Husaini details and states further that Allah decides whom he wants to be his messenger for his message.

The same is stated in Aale Umran 173 and Surate Bakr 130.

Now this looks like match-fixing. Allah decided some to be Kafir, some to be Momin and then some he chooses to be messenger. There is nothing that you or me can do anything about it.

So all that is happening is telecast of a TV Serial. Howsomuch you may try, you are destined to do and achieve what Allah has already decided before your creation and has written in Lohe-Mahfooz. There is no concept of free will or efforts here.

7. Surate Bakr 248 states that some brought faith and some remained Kafir. If Allah wanted, they would not have fought. But Allah wants them to fight.

Tafseer-e-Jalalyn writes here that Allah may make one capable and another person incapable of doing noble acts.

This view is repeated again in Surate Bakr 264.

So the Allah of Quran is the greatest criminal and trouble-maker.

8. Surate Bakr 280 states that Allah shall forgive whom he wants and punish whom he wants.

9. Surate Raad 26 states that Allah confuses whom he wants and guides others to His path.

So it is like Allah decided that some of us shall play villains and some shall play heroes. And then we face all the punishments including Hell for eternity because he thought so even before He created us!

10. Surate Hood 7 states that He tests who is best among us.

Thus Allah is no more than a corrupt chairman of selection committee. He has decided what questions to ask whom, he has decided what answers each one of his stooges will answer, he has decided what evaluation criteria he shall choose and has also decided who shall then be the winner. And everything has been documented in Lohe-Mahfooz under his throne!

11. Bani Israel Ayat 13 states that Allah has hanged an account over neck of every person and shall see an open book of justice on day of judgment.

Tafseer-e-Jalalyn demystifies this by explaining that no child is born without a sheet of paper over his neck which states whether the child is fortunate or unfortunate.

Tafseer-e-Husaini states that whatever has been written regarding fate of the child including his actions, cannot be changed in any manner.

12. The angry Allah states further in Surate Sijda that if I wanted, I could have shown the right path to everyone. But I have decided to fill the hell with humans and jinn together.

13. While all these Ayats of Quran prove that Allah is the greatest Kafir, there is a bigger question mark. When good people are already on right path as per Allah’s will, and evil-doers can no way be inspired to right path, what is the purpose of revealing Quran. What more is importance of Quran except a fake drama?

14. Some more examples of this whimsical nature in Quran are as follows:

Surate Bakr 212 – Allah gives unlimited wealth to those he desires.

Surate Shuara 78-79 – Allah has created me and he alone guides me and feeds me.

(Why is there a difference among different people then in the way they are fed?)

Surate Shuara 48 – He gives daughters to those he desires and renders others childless.

Surate Kasas 68 – He creates whatever He wants to.

Surate Bakr 118 – He has created the skies and earth. When he wants something to happen, he says “Fay Kun’ and it happens.

(Why the moody Allah needs to say even ‘Fay Kun’ is beyond comprehension? May be that’s His habit! But then we are merely puppets)

15. Surate Imran 50 even claims that Allah is the greatest cheat!

Tafseer-e-Husaini explains this: He captured Jesus Christ in variety of ways and imprisoned him. In morning Allah sent Yahuda, an old man in his house. In night Allah had already lifted Jesus Christ over the sky. Now he gave the face of Jesus to Yahuda. So instead of Jesus, Yahuda was hanged and killed.

Surate Infal 30 also states that Allah used to cheat and is the greatest cheat.

Surate Tarik 15 −16 again has Allah claiming that I am the greatest cheat. Allah taught special lessons of Adam and did not teach them to Angels. Then He asked both to compete. Obviously Adam won because he was taught by Allah. Thus Adam became superior to angels and angels had to bow to Adam.

Surate Tauba Ayat 79 says that Allah jokes with those who joke with Him. Nasa Ayat 142 states that those who deceive are deceived by Allah.

Surate Bakr 98 says that Allah is enemy of Kafirs.

Surate Nisa 88 states that Allah does opposite with those who do so. They have been deviated from path by Allah and hence you cannot bring them to right path even if you want.

Tafseer-e-Jalalyn explains this: In the battle of Uhad, a group of warriors retreated. So some said that they should be killed and others said they should be reverted back. Then Allah said that they have been deviated from path by Allah and hence they cannot be brought back again.

Surate Nisa 137 states that those who became Muslim and then became Kafir, then again became Muslim and again became Kafir and increased Kufra, they are not pardoned or shown path by Allah

Thus Allah is revengeful and emotionally surcharged. He creates souls, decides who will joke with him or deceive him or be Kafir. Then he gets angry with them and takes revenge. Are we discussing Allah or a psychopath in an asylum?

In summary, Allah is simply playing a game, if Quran is to be believed. And we all are mere guinea pigs whose fate was already written in Lohe-Mahfooz. Based on one single birth as per His will, we will act as per His will and then burn in Hell forever as per His will!

Destiny in Vedas

The concept of destiny in Vedas is completely different. The same is echoed in other philosophies of East also with minor differences. The salient points are as follows:

a. Soul is not created by Ishwar. It is eternal, unborn and undying.

b. Thus, Soul, Ishwar and Nature have always existed together and are all unborn and undying.

c. Soul keeps taking birth till they do not get rid of all ignorance and achieve Moksha or ultimate bliss.

d. Soul is somewhat free to do its actions and bound by laws of Ishwar to face the consequences.

e. The type of acts that a soul does (karma)- thoughts, words and acts – develop tendencies of mind (Sanskaars). As per these Sanskaars, they face the fruits of their karma.

f. Thus if a soul strives to purify its karma, it gradually creates a more favorable environment for its progress and prosperity.

g. The key to this process of purification is to listen to what is commonly called ‘voice of soul’ which protests when we do something wrong through feelings of fear, shame or doubt; and encourages us when we do something good through feelings of satisfaction, enthusiasm and peace. (This is not to be confused with mindless urges for material satisfaction)

h. Hence the discrepancies and anomalies in the world, and whatever that happens in the world with us are not due to whims of Ishwar. They are merely fruits of our own actions or karma as per unchangeable and completely uniform laws of Ishwar devoid of any favoritism. Hence all souls are exactly equal in all respect in terms of their competence and mentoring by Ishwar.

i. Ishwar is unchangeable and never deviates from his laws. So if a crooked is on wrong path, it is due to his own karma and not due to Ishwar’s whim. Further, each soul has the potential to reach Moksha regardless of its current state of ignorance.

j. The only way to achieve Moksha or bliss is through removal of ignorance. The only way to remove ignorance is through efforts. The only way to put these efforts is to perform actions. Thus soul needs mind, intellect, body and world to perform these actions. That is the purpose of this creation.

k. Just as soul, Ishwar and nature are eternal, similarly creation and destruction are also eternal processes. It is not that Allah decided one moment that he should create and then said “Fay Kun”!

l. There is no permanent Hell or Heaven. Deviating from path of good is Hell and striving on path of knowledge is Heaven. Thus everything is a continuous process. There is neither a permanent Paradise full of virgin girls, nor there is a permanent oven called Hell.

In fact beliefs in such superstitions and desires for such material pleasures are cause of miseries and grief, as per Vedas.

Muslim brothers and sisters should objectively evaluate the dogmas of false Quran that they have got trapped into, free their minds, and return to the path of Vedas, which is their original and only reliable passport to the true Heaven.

That is the only way to free their destiny from clutches of Lohe-Mahfooz and its author, and shape their own future of bliss!