RAPID Growth of MUSLIM population.

From: Rajput < >

CRY OF BRITISH MEDIA (below). RAPID EXPANSION OF MUSLIM NUMBERS.

Among the ultimate consequences are increase in terrorist acts, demand for Partition or even civil war.

Now to Bharat: Who is ensuring demographic balance in Partitioned India? Any idea of the rate of increase in Muslim numbers? Any idea of the end scene? Is there any Hindu “godfather”?

What about writing in the new Constitution the ultimate goal to take the frontier BACK TO KHYBER?

rajput

4 May 2020

==

24 Oct 15. From “The Daily Telegraph”, London, p. 2 (Even more topical & urgent today in 2020)

MUSLIM MEN ‘HAVING UP TO 20 CHILDREN’ AS SHARIA LETS THEM HAVE MULTIPLE WIVES

By Steven Swinford, Deputy Political Editor.

MUSLIM men in some communities are having up to 20 children each because of polygamy and the rise of “religiously sanctioned gender discrimination” under sharia, peers have warned.

Baroness Cox, a cross-bench peer, highlighted a series of “shocking!” examples of the impact of Islamic law on Muslim women in Britain as she called for them to be given greater protection under equality legislation.

She disclosed one case in which a 63-year-old man tried to divorce his 23-year-old wife and arrange her marriage to a Pakistani man who needed a visa. He asked a gynecologist to “repair the hymen” of his wife so she could re-marry, and stood to make £30,000 “for effecting the arrangement”.

“Such shocking cases surely cannot be allowed to continue,” she said. Baroness Cox also said that Muslim men divorce their wives just by saying or writing, “I divorce you” three times.

She added: “My Muslim friends tell me that in some communities with high polygamy and divorce rates, men may have up to 20 children each.

“Clearly, youngsters growing up in a dysfunctional family may be vulnerable to extremism and demography may affect democracy.” She put forward proposals to close a legal loophole that she said enables sharia courts to practice sexual discrimination.

Lord Green of Deddington, chairman of Migration Watch said,” We must be prepared to insist that there can be only one law.”

 

 

इस देश की दुर्दशा के लिए Secular जिम्मेदार-Vikaram Singh Ex DGP Uttar Pradesh

इस देश की दुर्दशा के लिए सेक्युलर जिम्मेदार-

Vikaram Singh Ex DGP Uttar Pradesh

 

 

We are Humane

Dear Hindus,
Ref. line: “We are humane.”
Sure we are, but due to the influence of Jainism, Buddhism, and Gandhism we are far more tolerant to aggressors than we should be per Dharma. In other words, we violated our dharma by being so much tolerant like stones that will tolerate any treatment to them. Let us see what Bhagavad Gita says about dharma:
 
Arjun, a Kshatriya, saw the opposite Kaurava’s army, saw his relatives and friends, and puujyas; and out of compassion he said to Krishna that he does not want to fight. Krishna did not say Arjun to sit on dhaarnaa and fast against Duryodhan. Instead, Krishna said Arjun to fight, because it was dharma yuddha opportunity, a war between divines and demoniacs.  Note that Kauravas were not Muslims, they were raised in the Vedics culture  also, but were demoniacs. Durhodjan had said, “जानाति धर्मः न च मे प्रवृत्ति।” He said he knows dharma, but has no inclination to live by it. 
 
The Vedic society should not tolerate demoniacs. 
And we Hindus tolerated Islamists for 1000 years. 
That is sin, and we are suffering because of that sin.
 
The Vedic society has Brahmanas, Kshartriyas, Vaishyas and Shudras; and all of them can fight against the demonics according to their guna and karma. No one should say: “we are humane and we should tolerate demoniacs no matter what.’ Brahmanas will fight at intellectual level, Kshatriyas will fight at physical level, Vaishyas will fight at trade/economy level, and shudras will fight at labor level. And Kshatriyas will maintain law and order, and protect the brahmanas. vaishiays will provide funding to fight.
 
Each of the four class should act per their varna dharma, except in emergency in which case one should act per आपद् धर्म , meaning execute other varna’s dharma in emergency. Thus, when Kshatriyas became asura like, then Parasuram, a brahmin, came and killed may kshatriyas single handed. Kautilya was a brahmin, but he took kshatriya dharma also when necessary.
Fighting for one’s self against asuras (injustice/aggressors) is one’s birthright, 
but fighting for the Vedic nation (for others good) opens the doors of haven, says Bhagavaan Krishna.
 
Only the stones do not fight back.
 
jaya sri krishna!
 
Suresh Vyas
Vedic preacher and purohit

देश के आन्तरिक दुश्मनो ने हालात बिगाड़ने की तैयारी बहुत करी है | Pushpendra Kulshrestha |