Author: Vyasji
आंदोलन की आड में था बडा प्लान | Satya Sanatan
Democracy ही भारत को ले डूबी वरना जापान से आगे होता भारत। Satya Sanatan
INDIA देश में 10 करोड़ से ज्यादा घुसपैठिये घुस चुके है | Pushpendra Kulshrestha
Sadhguru On How ‘Commercialization of agricultural methods could prove dangerous | Mystics of India
ग़ज़वा ए हिन्द से निबटने के लिये हमारे काम – Tufail Chaturvedi
Pujya Gaubhakt Sadhvi Shradha Gopal Sarswati Didi Ji….
#Sikh Sukhi Chahal Explains How Khalistanis are Trying to Exploit Farmer Protests in India
On Legal Aspect of Hate Speech
On Legal Aspect of Hate Speech
Most democracies say that hate speech is illegal, and should not be allowed, and be punished.
In judging a speech as a hate speech, the court does not find if the speech is telling a truth or a lie.
Take an example of Islam. It’s Books (Koran and Hadith) are fill of hate speeches against the kafirs (non-Muslims.) So, then on that ground the democracies must declare Islam illegal.
Additionally, if a kafir hates Islam, or Koran and Hadith, then the kafir has a valid ground to hate Islam.
The court cannot tell the kafirs to live Islam, the killer religion for the kafirs.
Therefore, when there is valid data/ground to hate something, then such a speech should not be punishable. Therefore, all the Hindus have the right to hate Islam and give hate speech on Islam on streets anytime, and it must not e punishable. If the Muslims come to attack them, then the Hindus have the birthright for aatma-raxan and kill the Muslims who come to attack them.
Bottom line: The court must judge of a hate speech has vaild ground for it or not. When no ground, then only it is punishable.
Jaya sri Krishna!
Suresh Vyas
Hinduunation.com
Moinuddin or Lootera Chisty