Month: February 2012

A warning from Britain about Islam

Pluralists, proselytizers and jihadists on the prowl;

a warning from Britain – Paul Weston

February 17, 2012
A warning from Britain

Jack Kemp

On Thursday night, the Chairman of the newly formed British Freedom Party, Paul Weston, spoke to a group of New Yorkers at an meeting sponsored by Brigitte Gabriel’s Act For America organization. Weston also said he came to warn America that what is happening in Britain today could happen in America in the not too distant future.
Five years ago, Mr. Weston was in private business (real estate) with no interest in politics, but seeing the decline in quality of life and cultural institutions in Britain caused him to start writing about these subjects. Weston then came to the conclusion that he could no longer sit on the sidelines as his country faced a “dystopian” future of mass immigration and riots in the street. Quoting Samuel Huntington’s The Clash of Civilizations, Weston spoke of “The Illusion of Permanency,” a belief that things will  go on much the same as they always have.
This illusion was easy for the native British population to maintain when they were the vast majority on the residents (the word “citizenry” doesn’t quite fit here). And this  is the attitude taken today by the British Conservative Party which refuses to talk in public, if not in private, about anything being out of sorts in Britain. I’d call it a British version of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” applied to jihadists and a potential sea change in British society and politics.
Mr. Weston spoke of how Tony Blair and his British Labor Party set out to destroy traditional Britain by encouraging mass immigration to ensure a majority that would vote for the Welfare State in perpetuity. Millions of people from around the world were invited to move to Britain.
Pamphlets were distributed in Pakistan, for example, urging locals to move to England and go on welfare. And both of these actions were facilitated and were, fed, in part, by post-colonial British guilt.
Today, although a native British citizen cannot marry more than one spouse, the United Kingdom pays welfare costs for immigrants with up to four wives and their children.
Seeing this problem in terms that the British Labor Party did not then anticipate and even now doesn’t comprehend, Muammar Gaddafi plainly spoke his mind years ago when he said, “We have fifty million Muslims in Europe. Allah will grant us victory without guns.”
The native British white population is having children at a rate of 1.4 per couple — and considerably fewer of them are forming couples these days. The immigrant Muslim population is having children at ten times that rate, Mr. Weston told the audience. Twenty percent of the British school population is white, he further said (yes, Weston is typically called a “Nazi and a racist” for pointing these facts out) and by 2050, this will make whites a minority in their own country. He also said that while the official population of Britain is sixty million, official state insurance card issued is a total of seventy-eight million, indicating an illegal population of sixteen million — or twenty-one percent of the whole.
“Many British (whites) are emigrating and the Left doesn’t care,” Weston said, as well as one hundred thousand of them have converted to Islam, most surprisingly women. He then posed the question: what if British Muslims could be able to impose a monoculture on the remaining whites? Answering himself, Weston stated that forty percent of British Muslims want sharia law and there was widespread rejoicing in British city streets by Muslims on September 11th, 2001. Today there are 3-4 Islamic terrorist attacks per week in Britain and constant calls by Islamists “for the murder of British Jews and homosexuals.”
To make matters worse, animosities in British society are centuries old.  Long time British leftists saw this as a way to get around their inability to “create a revolution” because they knew they could not directly “storm Buckingham Palace.” The labor union “leadership” in Britain has vigorously supported this mass immigration as well, even though the newcomers take jobs away from British workers. Mr. Weston also pointed out that since most of the Muslim immigrants settle mostly in England itself, Scottish and Welsh nationalists who have opposed the English for over a millennium are largely unconcerned about the problems in these other parts of Britain.
Paul Weston then addressed solutions to the problem(s) by asking, “What can we do about it?” Prefacing his next remarks by saying he could be jailed in Britain for what he was about to say (the charge would be inciting racial unrest or being anti-Muslim), he then advocated a stop to any more mass immigration to Britain.
He would deport foreign born criminals and also outlaw mosques “who preach terrorism.” If these things aren’t done, Weston added, “We could be in a worse situation than the breakup of Yugoslavia,” a situation that happened with surprising speed. He also advocated leaving the European Court of Human Rights and the European Union itself (one has to add assuming the EU still exists at the time of the next British election).
“We didn’t make all these sacrifices between 1939 and 1945 to give up now without firing a shot, “Weston emphatically stated, before commenting that the lack of Brits actually practicing Christianity has greatly hurt his country. He ended his speech by saying, “I implore America to not make the same mistakes that we have made in England.”
But there was more, as questions were taken from the audience. Mr. Weston was asked about Mark Steyn’s latest book “After America” which said that British Muslims from Pakistan have been marrying their first cousins at over a fifty percent rate, causing a number of genetic birth defects that overwhelm Britain’s National Health Service. He also was familiar with Ann Barnhardt’s article in American Thinker on the subject of Muslim first cousin marriage and inbreeding.  His reply, in part, was that in Britain, the rate of genetic disorders for Muslims was seven times greater than that of non-Muslims.
Weston also brought up the story of Channel Four, a news television station, which had filmed inside mosque services that called for the killing of Jews and homosexuals. After this was broadcast in Britain, Channel Four was charged with anti-Muslim racism.
Finally, the question of Geert Wilders came up. Mr. Weston said that Wilders is “the most important politician in Europe right now. If he gets a majority in three years (becomes the Prime Minister), it could cause a cascade (across Europe).
Expanding on the related topic of his plans for the British Freedom Party, Weston said, “I won’t get into power (in the next election) but I’d be glad to have the other parties steal our ideas or enact them.”  Weston then stated that although his party is now small, he would want it to be noticed in the 2014 elections and become a major influence in the next round. As all across Europe, Weston stated, there are many individuals in Britain who privately agree with his political views but are now both afraid to be called “racist” or worse and would rally to someone they feel speaks for them.
You can see and hear Paul Weston speak on internet video at his party’s website and on YouTube at a 2011 Amsterdam Rally for Free Speech. http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/02/a_warning_from_britain.html

Above article: “Weston also brought up the story of Channel Four, a news television station, which had filmed inside mosque services that called for the killing of Jews and homosexuals. After this was broadcast in Britain, Channel Four was charged with anti-Muslim racism.”
It is clear that ruthless elites wickedly believe that it is totally acceptable for hate-filled violent Muslims to call for the killing of Jews and homosexuals.
What elites consider to be unacceptable and an act to be punished is for anyone to warn people of the terrible evil that is preached in British mosques against innocents. God help Britain’s and the Free World’s innocents.

 

Islamist launches ‘Sharia for India’.

British Islamist Anjem Choudary Launches ‘Shariah for India,’ Vows to Demolish Hindu Temples and Bollywood; Muslims Urged to Join In New Delhi March Next Month Marking 88th Anniversary of the End of Islamic Caliphate

February 9, 2012

Inquiry & Analysis Series Report No. 797
British Islamist Anjem Choudary Launches ‘Shariah for India,’ Vows to Demolish Hindu Temples and Bollywood; Muslims Urged to Join In New Delhi March Next Month Marking 88th Anniversary of the End of Islamic Caliphate

By: Tufail Ahmad*
Introduction

British Islamist Anjem Choudary and Omar Muhammad Bakri – both former leaders of British jihadist organization Al-Muhajiroun – have launched an organization called Shariah for Hind (India) to advance their agenda for reestablishing Islamic rule in India. The group has planned a major public event in New Delhi on March 3, 2012, which marks the end of the Turkey-led Islamic caliphate 88 years ago.

 

It should be noted that during the British rule, Indian leaders like Maulana Abul Kalam Azad and Mahatma Gandhi campaigned for the Islamic caliphate led by Turkey – Gandhi doing so perhaps to gain Muslim support against British colonial rule in India.

 

Shariah for Hind plans to campaign for reestablishing Islamic rule in India with an ideological agenda which outlines a much purer form of Islamic rule for the country than that which existed during various periods of rule by Muslim kings in India both before and during the British era.

 

According to the ideological agenda stated on the group’s website, Islamic Shariah will be enforced in India; temples and statues of Hindu gods and Indian leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi will be demolished; and Bollywood, the world’s largest movie industry, will be abolished in order to make way for a monotheistic Islamic rule in the country.

 

Shariah for Hind – Leaders and Website Details

 

It appears that preparations for establishing Shariah for Hind began sometime in 2011; its website was launched in January 2012.

 

The domain for the website was created on January 3, 2012, according to its registration details.[1] The registrant for this website is “Abu Rumaysah c/o Dynadot Privacy, PO Box 701, San Mateo, CA 94401, United States.”[2]

 

The two leaders of this organization are identified as Sheikh Anjem Choudary and Sheikh Omar Muhammad Bakri. On the contact page of the website, these two names are published prominently: Sheikh Anjem Choudary, Judge of the UK Sharia Court, and Sheikh Omar Muhammad Bakri, who is identified as “Expert on Islamic Groups Worldwide.” Bakri’s phone number is given as 00961 70957759 – 961 being the country code for Lebanon.  Choudary’s phone number is given as 0044 7956 600 569.

 

The website of Sharia for Hind gives the name of its chairman as Abu Baraa and his phone contact as +44 7856827605. It also gives another phone contact, +44 7956041034, for Abu Rumaysah – Spokesman, a former Hindu, of Convert 2 Islam.

 

Shariah for Hind – The Ideology

 

“There is a Consensus among All Muslim Scholars That It is Not Permitted for Non-Muslims to Have Authority over Muslims; India Needs to Return Back to Her Glorious Islamic Past; India Needs a Muslim Revolution”

 

In a statement, titled “The Need for Muslim Rule in India,” Shariah for Hind notes that Muslims cannot live under non-Muslim rule, stating:[3]

 

“There is a consensus among all Muslim scholars that it is not permitted for non-Muslims to have authority over Muslims. Allah says in the Quran, ‘I have created you (Muslims) a leading Ummah (nation) in order to witness the affairs of mankind.’ [EMQ 2:143]

 

“Islam is the only religion to have maintained its relationship with God, with a miraculous book called the Quran and meticulous sciences that ensure texts recorded during the life of the final Messenger Muhammad can be verified, understood and authenticated. This cannot be said for any of the other world religions, which have literally been lost in translation.

“Fundamentally however, Islam is not a secular religion and, unlike the ‘biggest democracy in the world’ [i.e. India], always refers its governance back to the supreme commander, Allah (God).

 

“The Islamic constitution remains intact 1400 years after its inception, and emphatically puts the Indian constitution to shame. Political parties such as the BJP [Bharatiya Janata Party] and Indian [National] Congress have let India down because just like their British predecessors they were never suited to be rulers and so ruined their country with backward and evil policies.”

 

“India needs to return back to her glorious Islamic past. India needs a Muslim revolution.”

“Indian Political Parties Have Preyed on the Muslim Community, As the Wolf Preys a Lamb; They Have Divided Us with Nationalism and Poisoned Us with Democracy”

In a statement, Shariah for Hind identified its political objective as follows:[4]

 

“As a nation we used to move mountains.

 

“The Muslim Ummah (nation) is a community unparalleled in history. At its height in power it ruled over three continents. It brought tyrants to justice and liberated the oppressed. History still records their magnificent conquests, which against all odds defeated the mightiest of superpowers.

 

“But somewhere along the line that bright light waned and in 2012 we (Muslims) find ourselves bizarrely under the thumbs of the very people we were meant to liberate! India is now ruled by the most incompetent, unqualified and wicked individuals who have no clue about their purpose in life, let alone how to rule a nation. The Indian constitution, just like its Pakistani and Bangladeshi counterparts, [is] an appalling attempt at law and order, a stab in the dark, a gross display of trial and error.

 

“Indian political parties have preyed on the Muslim community, as the wolf preys a lamb; they have divided us with nationalism and poisoned us with democracy but most significantly have made us forget what the final Messenger Muhammad (peace be upon him) was sent down for i.e. the total domination of the world by Islam.

“And so we lay defenseless, strewn and confused.

 

“The Shariah4Hind project has thus been launched to kick start the return of Islam in the Indian subcontinent. Raw, undiluted and without compromise; it is the wild card which will inshaa’allah (God willing) make the Indian government forget about Kashmir. It is a call to unite over half a billion Muslims to retake what is rightfully theirs and galvanize a superpower unmatched in the world.

 

“3rd March 2012, New Delhi, India. A new spring waits.”

 

The Muslims versus the Non-Muslims

 

“The Whole of India is in Fact [a] Muslim Land, the Authority Belongs to… [Muslims] and That They Should Take It From the Current Ruling Party to Implement the Shari’ah… Instead [of] Begging for Rights from the Hindus, the Muslims in India Must Govern By the Law of the Creator Allah”

 

A January 2, 2012 press statement issued by Shariah for Hind urges Muslims to join. Following are excerpts from the statement:

 

“The elections [for states in January-February 2012] in India are underway and the main parties have not hidden their eagerness to garner the Muslim vote. From the Samajwadi Party (SP) promising job reservations to Deobandis [scholars of Darul Uloom Deoband seminary], the Congress party talking to Barelvis [clerics of Barelvi schools of thought based in the town of Bareilly], Rahul Ghandi [of Congress party] meeting the head of Nadwa[tul Ulema seminary in the town of Lucknow] to discuss minority welfare and the ruling [Bahujan Samaj Party] BSP’s Muslim face being in touch with several Muslim clerics, the race is on to bolster their respective vote bank and to win the elections. [Note: All seminaries cited here are in Muslim-heavy Uttar Pradesh state.]

 

“What is on offer for Muslims in the battle for their votes is supposedly community empowerment, quality education, protection and sensitivity in one form or other. Even the Peace Party and Ulema Council [political parties led by Muslims] have emerged to claim their stake.

 

“Sadly, the true rights of Muslims … [are] nowhere to be seen and no Islamic Scholar has had the courage to demand it. This is that the whole of India is in fact [a] Muslim land, the authority belongs to them and that they should take it from the current ruling party to implement the Shariah. Instead [of] begging for rights from the Hindus, the Muslims in India must govern by the law of the creator Allah (SWT). In fact it is an act of shirk(polytheism) to [be] rule[d] by other than what Allah has revealed or to ask another to do so (i.e. by voting for them).

 

“There is no Islamic justification for the Deobandis or Barelvis to participate in the kufr (non-Islamic) electoral system to elect someone who will violate the sanctity of Allah (SWT) by ruling according to man-made law. This is an act of apostasy from any Muslim which must be condemned.”

 

“We Therefore Call Upon All Muslims to Rise on the 3rd of March 2012 (the 88th Anniversary of the Destruction of the Last Islamic State) in New Dehli in a Public Demonstration and Demand… to Establish the Khilafah [Islamic Rule]”

 

“We therefore call upon all Muslims to rise on the 3rd of March 2012 (the 88th anniversary of the destruction of the last Islamic State) in New Dehli [Urdu for Delhi] in a public demonstration and demand what is rightfully theirs i.e. the authority, to establish the Khilafah and rule by the laws of God alone. To raise awareness about this obligation and to call for it and to work to establish it is an obligation upon Muslims wherever they are and to accept anything less is an act of war against Allah and his Messenger Muhammad (saw).

“Once established, the Islamic State will guarantee the rights of all citizens, Muslim and non-Muslim. It will be the job of the Khalifah [Islamic caliph] to ensure that food, clothing and shelter are afforded to all citizens and that they have a good Islamic education. The Khalifah will also be responsible to remove all public idols and ban alcohol and free-mixing between the genders in the public arena. Moreover institutions such as Bollywood and the caste system will be eradicated.

 

“The non-Muslims, whether Hindu or Sikh will have certain rights and responsibilities as set out by the divine law, in summary the privileges that they will have are:

 

“1. In return for paying the Jizya [Islamic poll tax on non-Muslims], their life and property will have sanctity. The Imam (khalifah) will have a duty to protect the non-Muslim citizens from the Muslims and the non-Muslims because they are living under his authority. Moreover they will benefit from the same welfare as all other citizens except what Shari’ah specifies for them and as long as they commit to abide by the law of Islam in the public arena. They will live among the Muslims and take Daw’ah i.e. be propagated to by the Muslims to embrace Islam.

 

“2. The non-Muslims will be allowed to live in the Muslim land (India and other territories which will be annexed to it in due course) i.e. they can go everywhere except where Allah (SWT) or the Khalifah prohibits, such as the haram [the Holy Mosque] in Mecca or to live in the Arab peninsula, although they can go to trade there.

 

“3. Muslims will be obliged to protect the non-Muslims because they are part of the Islamic State.

 

“4. Muslims will never attack their own temples and not take their pigs or alcohol unless they demonstrate them publicly.

 

“5. The non-Muslims also have the right to access the welfare system. The Jizya is only taken from able-bodied mature men, not women or children or priest or majnoon (mentally ill) or those incapable or disabled.”

 

“The Hindus or Sikhs or Other Non-Muslims… Must Not Build Any New Temples Nor Start to Sell Them and Buy New Ones, as Islam Forbids Us to Cooperate in the Bad Deeds; They Will Not Do Any Public Gathering of Their False Religion – Like Celebrating Christmas or Halloween or Diwali”

 

“In return, the Hindus or Sikhs or other non-Muslims will have certain duties, in summary:

 

“1. They must pay the Jizya depending on what the Khalifah adopts as the amount, for example a minimum of 1 Dinar a year or a maximum of 4 Dinar if rich.

 

“2. They must receive Muslims as guests if they are travelling. This applies to Muslims and non-Muslims if Muslims pass by.

 

“3. They must not build any new Temples nor start to sell them and buy new ones, as Islam forbids us to cooperate on the bad deeds.

 

“4. They must not show their symbols publicly or what is in their religion, like the pigs or alcohol or crosses or idols.

 

“5. They will not do any public gathering of their false religion – like celebrating Christmas or Halloween or Diwali or Guy Faulks night etc…

 

“6. Moreover they must be distinguished by their clothes so that we know who they are.

“7. They cannot raise their houses above ours.

 

“8. They must not harm Muslims in any way, not to insult Allah and his messenger or insult the book of Allah

 

“9. They will have the same liability in relation to the society i.e. the public law like in relation to adultery and stealing etc…”

 

The Cultural and Religious Agenda

 

“The Reconquest of India by Muslims Would See the Complete Demolition of Bollywood; Polytheism, Interfaith and Promiscuity and All of the Other Various Ills of the Bollywood Industry would Be Replaced with Islamic Monotheism”

 

A copy of Filmfare magazine that will be published under the Islamic Rule in India

 

The Shariah for Hind declares that the 2012 will mark the beginning of the end of Bollywood. Its statement on this subject declares:[5]

 

“The Indian cinema industry, commonly referred to as Bollywood, has a huge impact around the world. Bollywood produces some 1,000 films every year and sells over three billion cinema tickets in the same period. It is one of the most recognized symbols of India commanding a hypnotic influence over its followers.

 

“The impact of Bollywood in India and around the world should be a cause for great concern. The industry is luridly marred with corruption that has become progressively worse over the years. Notable examples include:

 

“Polytheism (glorifying the worship of idols, false gods, actors, actresses etc.)

“The promotion of interfaith (making Hindus and Muslims equal)

“Anti-Muslim propaganda

“Acting

“Nudity

“Free-mixing

“Promiscuity and fornication

“The exploitation of women

“Music

 

“The reconquest of India by Muslims would see the complete demolition of Bollywood and the Indian cinema industry. Its presence would be deemed as wholly unacceptable and in total opposition to the ethos of Islam. Ultimately, significant steps would be taken in order to see its complete destruction.

 

“With all remnants of the Bollywood industry thrown into the dustbins of history, possible uses of confiscated resources under Islamic rule include ‘Da’wah‘ (the propagation of Islam) and Islamic education.

 

“In conclusion, polytheism, interfaith and promiscuity and all of the other various ills of the Bollywood industry would be replaced with Islamic monotheism (Tawheed) and righteousness, providing a healthy environment for Muslims and non-Muslims to live under.”

 

“Associating Partners or Equals to Allah (God) is Seen as the Biggest Crime in Islam; The Establishment of the Shariah in India will Ultimately See an End to All Public Idols and Statues; We Envisage the Construction of Masjids (Mosques), Symbolizing the Transformation from Polytheism to Monotheism”

The head of Hindu god Lord Shiva is cut off in an image on the Shariah for Hind website

Shariah for Hind declares that statues of Hindu gods and of Indian leaders such Mahatma Gandhi will be demolished, as outlined in this statement:[6]

“India is one of the few countries in the world where explicit idolatry is openly celebrated. Public displays of paganism are common with idols present in nearly every town and city. Famous public idols include the Murudeshwara or Shiva statue in Karnataka, which stands at over 35 metres tall. Census reports show that over 800 million Hindus currently reside in India, with idols playing a big role in ritual practises.

“Statues of public figures are also a common feature of the Indian landscape. The Indian state of Gujarat announced in 2011 a project to build the world’s tallest statue paying ‘tribute’ to one of the foremost protagonists of Indian independence, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, a close companion of the tyrant Mohandas Gandhi.

“Associating partners or equals to Allah (God) is seen as the biggest crime in Islam. Allah says in the Quran, ‘…Indeed, associating partners with Allah is a great injustice.’ [EMQ 31:13]

“Islam also prohibits the construction of statues of living beings, men or women, righteous or wicked. Allah (God) relates to mankind (in the Quran) about the downfall of the people of ‘Ad, who erected large statues in commemoration of pious men. They were destroyed by a terrible storm.

“The establishment of the Shariah in India will ultimately see an end to all public idols and statues. Although non-Muslims (Hindus, Buddhists etc.) will not be prohibited from practising their religion privately, construction of idols and statues (in the public arena) will. Large scale projects outlining the destruction of public idols and statues will most likely be enforced, returning India back to her glorious Islamic past.

“As a possible replacement to India’s (public) idols and statues, we envisage the construction of Masjids(mosques), symbolizing the transformation from polytheism to monotheism, from darkness to light.”

* Tufail Ahmad is Director of the MEMRI South Asia Studies Project (www.memri.org/sasp)

Endnotes:

[1] http://www.who.is/whois/ shariah4hind.com/, accessed February 1, 2012.

[2] http://www.who.is/whois/ shariah4hind.com/, accessed February 1, 2012.

[3] http://shariah4hind.com/ project-hind/the-need-for- muslim-rule-in-india, accessed February 1, 2012.

[4] http://shariah4hind.com/ press-release/3rd-march-2012- a-new-spring-waits, accessed February 1, 2012.

[5] http://www.shariah4hind. com/project-hind/bollywood- gets-the-axe-under-the-shariah , accessed February 1, 2012.

[6] http://shariah4hind.com/ project-hind/the-islamic- destruction-of-indian-idols- and-statues, accessed February 1, 2012.

http://www.memri.org/report/ en/0/0/0/0/0/0/6071.htm

 

Meltdown of Pakistan

From: savarkar vinayak,

 

A part of article from N.S. Rajaram’s : MELTDOWN IN PAKISTAN

Very Interesting:

 

Saving Punjab is as much India’s responsibility as it is Pakistan’s. India cannot let these invading forces cross the Indus and turn West Punjab into a wasteland. The only way for Punjab to survive is to let the frontier be frontier and rejoin India, its natural home. But is the Punjabi ruling elite capable of such vision? As one Pakistani (Punjabi) journalist told Kaplan, “We have never defined ourselves in our own right, only in relation to India. That is our tragedy.” This attitude represents a historic truth: Punjab is India or it is happy hunting ground for the frontier tribes. If the Punjabis do not cure themselves of their hatred, it may soon lead to an even greater tragedy of Afghanistan consuming Pakistan itself. Punjabis should see for themselves that Pakistan is a fantasy that died the day Bangladesh broke away. They should also recognize that the Punjabis never asked for Pakistan; the people who planted that poison seed remained in India. And the same people ‘of the Deoband School of Lucknow’ planted also the poison seed that grew to be ‘Taliban’.

 

The choice for the Punjabis of Pakistan is clear. Forces of history and geography are against them. They can return to their natural home in India as the proud citizens of a great power(,) or continue their sordid existence as a client state that can be hired by a patron whenever a dirty job needs to be done. But even this is precarious and short-lived existence. For all its bombast, Pakistan ‘its Punjabi core at least’ is today little more than a buffer state between India and the violent frontier. Once they become part of India, they will have a great power to defend them against the hordes. One hopes they recognize the inexorability of the logic: it is India or oblivion, there is no middle ground.

 

For India the option is clear. Pakistan as it exists today is facing a meltdown. Changes of government and leaders will not turn back the elemental forces now in play. And negotiations and treaties with a melting state are meaningless. As India becomes a great power, the Pakistani Punjab and the land east of the Indus River will inexorably be drawn into India. And the Indus River will again be its natural boundary. There will be many challenges, but the goal is clear: to minimize the damage and destruction during this historic reunion, which I now feel is inevitable. In summary, India can no longer afford the luxury of being a soft state, continuing to avoid hard decisions and actions. A soft state at this critical juncture in history may also face a meltdown like Pakistan.

______________

N.S. Rajaram is a historian of science who has written extensively about Islam.

 

Nine Islamists jailed for plotting terror attacks

From: savarkar vinayak, savarkar_vinayak@yahoo.co.uk

Nine Islamists jailed for plotting terror attacks.

YAHOO NEWS 9 FEB 2012

A British court on Thursday jailed nine Islamists inspired by slain Al-Qaeda lynchpin Anwar al-Awlaqi for planning terror attacks on targets including the London Stock Exchange.

 

The nine men, who are all British nationals of Bangladeshi and Pakistani origin, had pleaded guilty to a variety of terror-related offences at a hearing a week ago at Woolwich Crown Court in southeast London.

 

Judge Alan Wilkie sentenced three of the men to “imprisonment for public protection” — an indeterminate jail term for suspects regarded as dangerous — while the other sentences ranged from 16 years to five years.

 

Wilkie said they were “fundamentalist Islamists who have turned to violent terrorism in direct response to material, both propagandist and instructive, issued on the Internet by Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.”

 

Awlaqi, the US-born leader of AQAP, was killed on September 30 in an air strike in Yemen.

Wilkie added that it was a “difficult and complex sentencing” that “gives rise to a number of issues of principle and has a high profile”.

 

Prosecutors said the men belonged to a group of fundamentalists who planned a spate of mail bomb attacks during the run-up to Christmas 2010 and discussed launching a “Mumbai-style” atrocity.

 

Four of the men — Mohammed Chowdhury, 21, and Shah Rahman, 28, from London and brothers Gurukanth Desai, 30, and Abdul Miah 25, from Cardiff — admitted preparing for acts of terrorism by planning to plant an improvised explosive device (IED) in the toilets of the London Stock Exchange.

 

Miah was jailed for 16 years and 10 months, Chowdhury for 13 years eight months, Rahman and Desai for 12 years each.

 

Three others, Mohammed Shahjahan, 27, Usman Khan, 20, and Nazam Hussain, 26, all from Stoke in central England, received indeterminate sentences with a minimum of eight years for making longer-term plans which included taking part in “terrorist training” in Pakistan.

 

Another man, Omar Latif, 28, from Cardiff, admitted preparing for acts of terrorism but was not involved in the specific plots and was jailed for 10 years four months.

 

Mohibur Rahman, 27, from Stoke, admitted possessing a copy of Inspire, an Internet magazine produced by AQAP, and was jailed for five years.

 

The Crown Prosecution Service said after the hearing that the men were “not members of Al-Qaeda but they were clearly influenced” by Awlaqi.

 

“What they had in common was that they all held extreme fundamentalist religious beliefs and were committed to converting those beliefs into terrorist action,” CPS counter-terrorism lawyer Piers Arnold said.

 

During the case, prosecutors said police found a handwritten target list at the home of one of the men that included the Stock Exchange, the US embassy in London, Mayor of London Boris Johnson and two rabbis.

 

They also talked about travelling to a militant training camp in Pakistani Kashmir.

The group, who met due to their membership of various extremist Islamic groups, had originally challenged the charges against them and were due to stand trial, but at the 11th hour they changed their pleas to guilty.

Ismaili method to convert Hindus

Ismaili method to convert Hindus

From: Vishal Agarwal, vishalsagarwal@yahoo.com

NOTE: See references at the end

 

Ismailis have been known to digest Hinduism and other religions for more than 1000 years now. It is surmized that they were responsible for spreading Islam in much of SW Punjab (Multan region), Sindh, Kutch, Gujarat, Rajasthan. Eventually, when the Qaramatian kingdom was smashed by Mahmud Ghaznavi (and after their kingdoms in Sindh also fell) who was a staunch Sunni, these half-Hindu and half-Ismailis became Sunnis, a notable example being the Sammas and Sumra dynasties of Sindh [Quereshi 1962: 49-51]. In many parts of India (Rajasthan and Gujarat) however, the Ismailis were re-absorbed into the dominant Hindu culture, although vestiges of the Ismaili past are still visible and are a sensitive issue in some Sampradayas today (e.g. the Pranamis, the mother of Mahatma Gandhi being a member of that that sect). Many of the so called Sunni sufis of Multan were actually Ismaili but their descendants found it inconvenient to retain their Ismaili or Shia heritage. The present day remnants of these Ismailis are Bohris, Khojas and Memons as well as the heretical Alawites in the middle east.

A considerably exaggerated account of Ismaili Dawa’a is contained in the works of Dominique Sila Khan who however tends to overstate the case of Ismaili influence. She unethically posed as a French tourist wwho pretended to be interested in converting to the Pranami faith. She concealed her intentions or the fact that she was a researcher who was interested in pushing the thesis that the Pranamis originated as Nizari Ismaili Muslims. Fearing violent Muslim retaliation, the Pranamis decided not to file a legal case against her. See Sharma (2006), p. 82, 96 below. One example of Sila Khan’s exaggeration is that she thinks that even the early Sikh Gurus were Ismailis but their Islamic heritage was suppressed by later Gurus!

 

Some tell tale descriptions of Ismaili tactics by Pakistani or Muslim authors –

 

“In those days the Ismailis had a tradition of posing as adherents of the faith within which they worked. They worked both among the Sunnis and the non-Muslims. There are several instances on record where an Ismaili missionary posed as a Brahmin or a Hindu priest and instead of flatly contradicting the doctrines of the faith he sought to subvert, he accepted its basic assumptions and introduced some of Ismaili beliefs in a disguised form and thus slowly and gradually paved the way for total conversion. Lack of total adherence has never worried the Ismailis because they are fully confident that the convert will ultimately accept the faith fully. This kind of conversion is achieved in a peculiar manner. In the beginning, the appeal is not on the basis of dogma or beliefs, but an attempt is made to convince the potential convert of the spiritual greatness of some person. In the early days, the missionary himself was a man of exemplary character. Very often, Ali was depicted as an incarnation of Vishnu among the Vaishnavites. In short, after some personal loyalty had been created, the disciple was taken through various stages into full-fledged belief in the teachings of Ismaili Islam. The Ismailis were here at an advantage compared to the Sunnis because the latter insist upon total conversion right from the beginning and are not willing to make the least compromise in the matter of doctrine. A change in the name of the convert also became common. The reason for this, in the beginning, was that the pagan names among the converts were often offensive to Muslim ideas of monotheism. Later, however, a change of name became almost obligatory in the popular mind. The justification has been that the convert is thus weaned away totally from his associations with the past which are rooted in a religious tradition. The Ismaili technique has been different. The inspiration has come from their insistence upon certain esoteric meanings of all exoteric institutions of religion. Because they could expand their influence in the world of Islam only by continuous propaganda, they were experts in the propagation of their views.” [Qureshi, 1962:45]
Another historian writes – “the reports sent by Ismaili missionaries from Multan and Sind to the Fatimid Caliph in Cairo are available in the works, compiled in Egypt during the Fatimid period. These reports shed interesting light on the Ismaili propaganda carried on by dais (missionaries). The missionary activity, known as dawa was the most characteristic institutions of Ismailism. Under it, the dai (missionary) was appointed by the Caliph to work in distant places and counties, attract people towards their faith and bring them under its fold. In the first instance the dai worked in the guise of a Hindu monk or a Sunni Muslim as the circumstances demanded of him and would change his method after he had won over a large number of converts to Ismailism. Unlike the Arabs, they (Unlike the Arabs who) were fanatics and hardly tolerated the shrines or places of worship belonging to non-Muslims. A letter dispatched by the dai of Sind in 962 AD to the Caliph tells us how the Ismailis made compromise with Hindu customs and rites in the beginning and then forced their own laws upon the converts. In the letter the dai, Halam mentions the victory “which he achieved in Sind. He writes that he had broken the idols, for the destruction he had previously asked the Imam’s permission”[Siddiqui 1987:38]

 

Sat Panth name is not a new, but an old name for Nizari Ismailis for several centuries now.

 

References:

Qureshi, Ishtiaq Husain. 1962. The Muslim Community in the Indo-Pakistan Subcontinent (610-1947). Mouten & Co (‘S-Gravenhage, W Germany).

 

Sharma, Chhavi Bhargava. 2006. Between the Two Worlds – Long Term Effects of Communal Violence on a Multi-religious, Marginalized Community. WISCOMP. New Delhi

 

Siddiqui, Iqtidar Husain. 1987. Islam and Muslims in South Asia: Historical Perspective. Adam Publishers and Distributers (New Delhi)

 

Ahmadis Worship Site under threat of demolition in Pakistan

From: Deva Samaroo, devasamaroo@hotmail.com

Ahmadis Worship Site under threat of demolition in Pakistan: Source

By Faiza Mirza

February 1, 2012

RAWALPINDI:  Worshippers at Ewan-e-Tauheed, which is the main worship site for Ahmadis in Rawalpindi, fear that the building will be demolished because of the recent propaganda embroiling Ahmadis and their religious practices, alleged Saleemuddin whilst taking to the reporters of Dawn.com

Saleemuddin, spokesperson of Jamaat Ahmadiyya Pakistan, whilst speaking to Dawn.com alleged, “ The conspiracy started in the May of 2011, however the situation deteriorated in September and we were asked to pack up and leave the town as it was a ‘residential area’ where a place like ‘a site to worship’ could not operate.”

The first rally was organised on January 29, 2012 which was attended by various religious clerics. During the rally, a deadline of one month was given to the administration of Ewan-e-Tauheed, to wind up their activities.

“One of the people who presided from the session said that we will not let Ahmadis pray on the next Friday. Closing down Ewan-e-Tauheed will be a huge victory for us and will be another step closer to extraditing them from Pakistan,” he further alleged.

Saleemuddin claims that along with him, other Ahmadis have also contacted the Punjab and Federal government, which motivated the Punjab government to instruct the local law enforcing bodies to stay active and protect the site and the worshipers.

“So far we have not received targeted threats, however, we know through sources that the perpetrators plan to demolish this site like 30 others which have been demolished in the past,” said Saleemuddin.

“According to the Constitution of Pakistan, we have a right to worship and profess our religion. We are not allowed to construct new mosques and now we are being threatened not to worship as well. We request the government and Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) to look into the matter and help us before the situation blows out of proportion as has happened in the past,” he added.

http://www.dawn.com/2012/02/01/ewan-e-tauheed-under-threat-of-demolition-source.html

GET RID OF THE BLACK ISLAMIC BEAR (KASHMIR BELONGS TO INDIA)

From: Rashtra1947@aol.com

GET RID OF THE BLACK ISLAMIC BEAR

(KASHMIR BELONGS TO INDIA)

A Muslim writer wrote, “Kashmir is the jugular vein of Pakistan.” We wish to educate him.

If Kashmir is the “jugular vein” of Pakistan then pray, tell us, what are the INDIAN MUSLIMS? Are they simply a lethal appendix in Bharat? Do you not think that with the mutilation of India in 1947 it was ALSO the Muslims. the second nation, that was savagely cut and chopped into THREE fragments.

In that year from ONE fully integrated, secular and sensible INDIAN Muslim community (“Saare Jahan se achcha Hindusthan Hamaara!” – Poet Mohammed Iqbal) we saw THREE divided, broken, confused & rootless Muslim communities- one in East Pakistan, one in West Pakistan and one in the Middle, in (what was left of) India.

How foolish and treacherous of the Muslim leaders to inflict ISLAMIC calamity on the noble land that had given them birth and nourished them! Mohammed himself would have found peace in his soul had he come and stayed in Hindusthan like Jesus Christ.

25 years passed after Partition for the Islamic “way of life” based on the Book from Arabia to entrench itself deeper in the two wings of Pakistan that in 1971 came to blows with each other under the law of nature that says, “Death to the Fool!”

From the belly of Pakistan the new state of Bangladesh was born just as Pakistan herself was born after “caesarean” operation of (Mother) India in 1947.

May we inform you that the INDIAN Muslims, who were living happily, and refused to emigrate to the Land of their Allah, also now consider themselves to be the “jugular vein” of India. You can check up on this with Dr. Zakir Naik of “Peace TV” and Imam Bukhari of Jama Masjid, Delhi. How happy they are in the Land of Kafirs! They would rather die than go and live in Islamic Pakistan.

Perhaps the best place for all of you is Saudi Arabia where it all began with the “poison” of anti Kafir indoctrination that is still carrying on and will never end so long as you have the source- your anti Kafir, anti Pig & anti Dog Book of Provocation & Poison.

Do you really need that Book from alien Arabia when in India itself there are countless holy Scriptures and dozens of divine books that inspire people to live in peace, mind their own business, love all the animals and inculcate the love of nature & the entire mankind?

What sort of Pakistan do you wish Kashmir to join? Ask those Muslim criminals in England threatened with deportation to Pakistan. They describe it perfectly well when they plead upon their knees, “Please do not send us back to HELL.”

Your thinking would be very shallow if you did not think of the shattering effect on India if Kashmir, the cradle of Indian civilisation and the Land of ancient Rishis & Sages, is surrendered to the Devil. Here is the scenario:

The Muslims in India now regard themselves as Indians and will have great contempt for their country if they see India betraying Secularism again as traitor Nehru betrayed it in 1947 and his arrogant daughter Maimuna Begum (aka “Indira Gandhi”) turned her back on it in East Bengal in 1972. Their faith in Secularism and India will be irrevocably shattered for ever.

The Hindus will realize the futility of such Secularism that is deceitfully imposed on them only, and will rise against their rulers who are quick to surrender principles and territory to Islam.

Sikh patriots will look very sheepish in Bharat that has always surrendered territory to the Muslims but never gained an inch back. What will you tell these warriors who once defeated the Afghans and captured KHYBER PASS? Kashmir was part of the powerful Sikh Kingdom from 1819 until 1846 AD.

Finally, look at Pakistan itself.  What have Islam and Koran done to her? She now resembles a lawless wild country where abduction, rape, murder and bomb blasts are a daily occurrence? Why not ask the children of Liaqat Ali Khan, Zulfiqar Ali, Benazir Bhutto, Zia ul Haq and Salman Taseer as to what they think of the Pakistan of your Rasool Allah?

Can the Kashmiris NOT see with their own eyes that the restless & turbulent Pakistan, that was created in HIGH TREASON, is dying its natural death and will finally IMPLODE or DISINTEGRATE?

At this time you ought to be telling Sindh, Balochistan and Pakhtoon Khwa to love Pakistan, and ask TALIBAN & AL QAIDA to declare peace instead of “going” for ISLAMABAD, the jugular vein of Pakistan.

If Koran, Islam and the love of Arabian desert, dates & camels have not taken over your senses completely, you ought to be speaking up for “Akhand Bharat” where your ancestors were living happily so that we could all see a prosperous Hindusthan from Khyber to Chittagong and from Gilgit to Kerala in which everyone is an Indian, not Hindu, Muslim, Christian, Sikh or Buddhist.

You write, “KASHMIR IS THE JUGULAR VEIN OF PAKISTAN AND IT CANNOT ABANDON IT.” This reminds us of the drowning idiot in deep water who caught hold of the bear thinking it was a blanket. To the onlookers on the banks he shouted, “I want to leave it but IT DOES NOT LET GO OF ME!”

For God’s sake, please do get rid of the black Islamic “BEAR”.

Wish you sanity, wisdom and courage.

 

Kuru

PS: Hindus, too, ought to understand the Devil’s mind of their own pseudo-secular “Hindu bashing” Sarkar that desperately needs the Kashmir “dispute” to secure their own legitimacy to rule Bharat for ever. 

They will NOT repeal Article 370 of “Bandit’s Constitution” that ensures separate identity of Kashmir and Muslim majority there.

==========================

The secrets of the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty

From: yogesh saxena

The Nehru-Gandhi dynasty

starts with the Mughal man named Ghiyasuddin Ghazi.

The Nehru-Gandhi dynasty starts with the Mughal man named Ghiyasuddin Ghazi. He was the City Kotwal i.e. police officer of Delhi prior to the uprising of 1857, under the Mughal rule. After capturing Delhi in 1857, in the year of the mutiny, the British were slaughtering all Mughals everywhere. The British made a thorough search and killed every Mughal so that there were no future claimants to the throne of Delhi. The Hindus on the other hand were not targeted by the British unless isolated Hindus were found to be siding with the Mughals, due to past associations. Therefore, it became customary for many Mohammedans to adopt Hindu names. So, the man Ghiyasuddin Ghazi (the word means kafir-killer) adopted a Hindu name Gangadhar Nehru and thus saved his life by the subterfuge. Ghiyasuddin Ghazi apparently used to reside on the bank of a canal (or Nehr) near the Red Fort. Thus, he adopted the name ‘Nehru’ as the family name. Through out the world, we do not find any descendant other than that of Gangadhar, having the surname Nehru. The 13th volume of the “Encyclopedia of Indian War of Independence” (ISBN:81-261-3745-9<tel:81-261-3745-9) by M.K. Singh states it elaborately. The Government of India have been hiding this fact.

City Kotwal was an important post like today’s Commissioner of Police. It appears from Mughal records that there was no Hindu Kotwal employed. It was extremely unlikely for a Hindu to be hired for that post. Compulsorily only Mohammedans of foreign ancestry were hired for such important posts.

Jawaharlal Nehru’s second sister Krishna Hutheesing also mentions in her memoirs that her grandfather was the city Kotwal of Delhi prior to 1857’s uprising when Bahadur Shah Zafar was still the sultan of Delhi. Jawaharlal Nehru, in his autobiography, states that he has seen a picture of his grandfather which portrays him like a Mughal nobleman. In that picture it appears that he was having long & very thick beard, wearing a Muslim cap and was having two swords in his hands. Jawaharlal Nehru also states in his autobiography that on their way to Agra (a seat of Mughal influence) from Delhi, the members of his grandfather’s family were detained by the British. The reason for the detention was their Mughal features. They however pleaded that they were Kashmiri Pandits and thus got away. The Urdu literature of the 19th century, especially the works of Khwaja Hasan Nizami, is full of the miseries that the Mughals and Mohammedans have to face then. They also describe how Mughals escaped to other cities to save their lives. In all probability, Jawahar Nehru’s Mughal grandfather and his family were among them.

Jawaharlal Nehru was a person that India adores. He was undoubtedly a very sound politician and a gifted individual. But, the Government of India has not built a memorial of Jawaharlal Nehru at his birth place 77 Mirganj in Allahabad, because it is a brothel. The entire locality is a well known red light area since long. It has not become a brothel recently, but it has been a brothel even before Jawaharlal Nehru’s birth. A portion of the same house was sold by his father Motilal Nehru to a prostitute named Lali Jaan and it came to be known as “Imambada”. If you have some doubt, you may visit the place. Several dependable sources and also encyclopedia.com & Wikipedia say this. Motilal Nehru along with his family, later shifted to Anand Bhawan. Remember that Anand Bhawan is Jawaharlal Nehru’s ancestral house and not his birth place.

M. O. Mathai of Indian Civil Service served as the Private Secretary to Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru. Mathai has written a book “Reminiscences of the Nehru Age” (ISBN-13: 9780706906219).In the book Mathai reveals that there was intense love affair between Jawaharlal Nehru and Edwina Mountbatten (wife of the last Viceroy to India, Louis Mountbatten). The romance was a source of great embarrassment for Indira Gandhi, who used to seek Maulana Abul Kalam Azad’s help in persuading her father to be little discreet about their relationship. Also Nehru had love affair with Sarojini Naidu’s daughter Padmaja Naidu, whom Nehru got appointed as the Governor of Bengal. It is revealed that he used to keep her portrait in his bed room, which Indira would often remove. It caused some tension between father and daughter.

Apart from these ladies, Pandit Nehru had an affair with a sanyasin from Benares named Shraddha Mata. She was an attractive Sanskrit scholar well versed in the ancient Indian scriptures and mythology. When she conceived out of their illicit relationship, in 1949, in a convent in Bangalore, she insisted that Nehru should marry her. But, Nehru declined that because it could affect his political career. A son was born and he was kept at a Christian Missionary Boarding School. His date of birth is estimated to be 30th May, 1949. He may be in his early sixties now. Convents in such matters maintain secrecy to prevent humiliation of the child. Though Mathai confirmed the existence of the child, no efforts have ever been made to locate him. He must have grown up as a Catholic Christian blissfully ignorant of who his father was.

Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose and Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee were competitors of Jawaharlal Nehru for the post of Prime Minister of India and both of them died under mysterious circumstances. Knowing all these facts, is there any meaning of celebrating Nehru’s birthday as Children’s Day? Presenting him as a different person to our children, and hiding the truth amounts to denying education to them.

As per the book “The great divide: Muslim separatism and partition” (ISBN-13:9788121205917) by S.C. Bhatt— Jawaharlal Nehru’s sister Vijaya Lakshmi eloped with her father’s employee Syud Hussain. Then Motilal Nehru forcefully took her back and got her married with another man named Ranjit Pandit.

Indira Priyadarshini perpetuated immorality in the Nehru dynasty. Intellectual Indira was admitted in Oxford University but driven out from there for non-performance. She was then admitted to Shantiniketan University but, Guru Dev Rabindranath Tagore chased her out for bad conduct.

After driven out of Shantiniketan, Indira became lonely as father was busy with politics and mother was dying of tuberculosis in Switzerland. Playing with her loneliness, Feroze Khan, son of a grocer named Nawab Khan who supplied wines etc to Motilal Nehru’s household in Allahabad, was able to draw close to her. The then Governor of Maharashtra, Dr. Shriprakash warned Nehru, that Indira was having an illicit relation with Feroze Khan. Feroze Khan was then in England and he was quite sympathetic to Indira. Soon enough she changed her religion, became a Muslim woman and married Feroze Khan in a London mosque. Indira Priyadarshini Nehru changed her name to Maimuna Begum. Her mother Kamala Nehru was totally against that marriage. Nehru was not happy as conversion to Muslim will jeopardize her prospect of becoming Prime Minister.

So, Nehru asked the young man Feroze Khan to change his surname from Khan to Gandhi. It had nothing to do with change of religion from Islam to Hinduism. It was just a case of a change of name by an affidavit. And so Feroze Khan became Feroze Gandhi, though it is an inconsistent name like Bismillah Sarma. Both changed their names to fool the public of India. When they returned to India, a mock vedic marriage was instituted for public consumption. Thus, Indira and her descendants got the fancy name Gandhi. Both Nehru and Gandhi are fancy names. As a chameleon changes its colour, this dynasty has been changing its name to hide its real identity.

Indira Gandhi had two sons namely Rajiv Gandhi and Sanjay Gandhi. Sanjay was originally named as Sanjiv that rhymed with Rajiv, his elder brother’s name. Sanjiv was arrested by the British police for a car theft in the UK and his passport was seized. On Indira Gandhi’s direction, the then Indian Ambassador to UK, Krishna Menon misusing his power, changed his name to Sanjay and procured a new passport. Thus Sanjiv Gandhi came to be known as Sanjay Gandhi.

It is a known fact that after Rajiv’s birth, Indira Gandhi and Feroze Gandhi lived separately, but they were not divorced. The book “The Nehru Dynasty” (ISBN 10:8186092005

<tel: 8186092005>) by K. N. Rao states that the second son of Indira (or Mrs. Feroze Khan) known as Sanjay Gandhi was not the son of Feroze Gandhi. He was the son of another Muslim gentleman named Mohammad Yunus.

Interestingly Sanjay Gandhi’s marriage with the Sikh girl Menaka took place in Mohammad Yunus’ house in New Delhi. Apparently Yunus was unhappy with the marriage as he wanted to get him married with a Muslim girl of his choice. It was Mohammad Yunus who cried the most when Sanjay Gandhi died in plane crash. In Yunus’ book, “Persons, Passions & Politics” (ISBN-10: 0706910176) one can discover that baby Sanjay was circumcised following Islamic custom.

It is a fact that Sanjay Gandhi used to constantly blackmail his mother Indira Gandhi, with the secret of who his real father is. Sanjay exercised a deep emotional control over his mother, which he often misused. Indira Gandhi chose to ignore his misdeeds and he was indirectly controlling the Government.

When the news of Sanjay Gandhi’s death reached Indira Gandhi, her first question was “Where are his keys and his wrist watch?”. Some deep secrets about the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty seems to be hidden in those objects. The plane accident was also mysterious. It was a new plane that nosedive to a crash and yet the plane did not explode upon impact. It happens when there is no fuel. But the flight register shows that the fuel tank was made full before take-off. Indira Gandhi using undue influence of PM’s office prohibited any inquiry from taking place. So, who is the suspect?

The book “The Life of Indira Nehru Gandhi” (ISBN: 9780007259304) by Katherine Frank sheds light on some of Indira Gandhi’s other love affairs. It is written that Indira’s first love was with her German teacher at Shantiniketan. Later she had affair with M. O. Mathai (father’s secretary), then Dhirendra Brahmachari (her yoga teacher) and at last with Dinesh Singh (Foreign Minister).

Former Foreign Minister K Natwar Singh made an interesting revelation about Indira Gandhi’s affinity to the Mughals in his book “Profile and Letters” (ISBN: 8129102358<tel:8129102358>). It states that- In 1968 Indira Gandhi as the Prime Minister of India went on an official visit to Afghanistan. Natwar Singh accompanied her as an IFS officer in duty. After having completed the day’s long engagements, Indira Gandhi wanted to go out for a ride in the evening. After going a long distance in the car, Indira Gandhi wanted to visit Babur’s burial place, though this was not included in the itinerary. The Afghan security officials tried to dissuade her, but she was adamant. In the end she went to that burial place. It was a deserted place. She went before Babur’s grave, stood there for a few minutes with head bent down in reverence. Natwar Singh stood behind her. When Indira had finished her prayers, she turned back and told Singh “Today we have had our brush with history.” Worth to mention that Babur was the founder of Mughal rule in India, from which the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty have descended.

It is difficult to count how many institutes of higher education are named after Rajiv Gandhi but, Rajiv Gandhi himself was a person of low calibre. From 1962 to 1965, he was enrolled for a Mechanical Engineering course at Trinity College, Cambridge. But, he left Cambridge without a degree because, he could not pass exams. Next year in 1966, he joined Imperial College, London but, again left it without a degree.

K. N. Rao in the above said book alleges that Rajiv Gandhi became a Catholic to marry Sania Maino. Rajiv became Roberto. His son’s name is Raul and daughter’s name is Bianca. Quite cleverly the same names are presented to the people of India as Rahul and Priyanka. In personal conduct Rajiv was very much a Mughal. On 15th August 1988 he thundered from the ramparts of the Red Fort: “Our endeavor should be to take the country to heights to which it belonged about 250-300 years ago. It was then the reign of Aurangzeb, the ‘jeziya’ master and number one temple destroyer.”

The press conference that Rajiv Gandhi gave in London after taking over as prime minister of India was very informative. In this press conference, Rajiv boasted that he is not a Hindu but a Parsi. Feroze Khan’s father and Rajiv Gandhi’s paternal grandfather was a Muslim gentleman from the Junagadh area of Gujarat. This Muslim grocer by the name of Nawab Khan had married a Parsi woman after converting her to Islam. This is the source where from the myth of Rajiv being a Parsi was derived. Mind that he had no Parsi ancestor at all. His paternal grandmother had turned Muslim after having abandoned the Parsi religion to marry Nawab Khan.

Surprisingly, Parsi Rajiv Gandhi was cremated as per Vedic rites in full view of Indian public.

Dr. Subramanian Swamy writes that Sonia Gandhi’s name was Antonia Maino. Her father was a mason. He was an activist of the notorious fascist regime of Italy and he served five years imprisonment in Russia. Sonia Gandhi have not studied beyond high school. She learnt some English from a English teaching shop named Lennox School at the Cambridge University campus. From this fact she boasts of having studied at the prestigious Cambridge University. After learning some English, she was a waitress at a restaurant in Cambridge town.

Sonia Gandhi had intense friendship with Madhavrao Scindia in the UK, which continued even after her marriage. One night at 2 AM in 1982, Madhavrao Scindia and Sonia Gandhi were caught alone together when their car met an accident near IIT Delhi main gate.

When Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi were Prime Ministers, PM’s security used to go to New Delhi and Chennai international airports to send crates of Indian treasures like temple sculptures, antiques, paintings etc to Rome. Arjun Singh as CM and later as Union Minister in charge of Culture used to organize the plunder. Unchecked by customs, they were transported to Italy to be sold in two shops named Etnica & Ganpati, owned by Sonia Gandhi’s sister Alessandra Maino Vinci.

Indira Gandhi died not because her heart or brain were pierced by bullets, but she died of loss of blood. After Indira Gandhi was fired upon, Sonia Gandhi strangely insisted that bleeding Indira Gandhi should be taken to Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, in opposite direction to AIIMS which had a contingency protocol to precisely deal with such events. After reaching Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, Sonia Gandhi changed her mind and demand that Indira Gandhi should be taken to AIIMS, thus wasting 24 valuable minutes. It is doubtful whether it was immaturity of Sonia Gandhi or a trick to speedily bring her husband to power.

Rajesh Pilot and Madhav Rao Scindia were strong contenders to the Prime Minister’s post and they were road blocks in Sonia Gandhi’s way to power. Both of them died in mysterious accidents.

There are circumstantial evidences pointing to the prima facie possibility that the Maino family have contracted LTTE to kill Rajiv Gandhi. Nowadays, Sonia Gandhi is quite unabashed in having political alliance with those like MDMK, PMK and DMK who praise Rajiv Gandhi’s killers. No Indian widow would ever do that. Such circumstances are many, and raise a doubt. An investigation into Sonia’s involvement in Rajiv’s assassination is necessary. You may read Dr. Subramanian Swamy’s book “Assassination Of Rajiv Gandhi — Unasked Questions and Unanswered Queries” (ISBN : 81-220-0591-8<tel:81-220-0591-8>). It contains indications of such conspiracy.

In 1992, Sonia Gandhi revived her citizenship of Italy under Article 17 of the Italian Citizenship Law. Under Italian law, Rahul and Priyanka are Italian citizens because Sonia was an Italian citizen when she gave birth to them. Rahul Gandhi’s Italian is better than his Hindi. Rahul Gandhi is an Italian citizen is relevant from the fact that on 27th September 2001 he was detained by the FBI at Boston airport, USA for traveling on an Italian passport. If a law is made in India that important posts like that of President and Prime Minister should not be held by a person of foreign origin, then Rahul Gandhi automatically disqualifies to contend for the post of Prime Minister. After finishing school education, Rahul Gandhi got admission at the St. Stephens College in New Delhi, not on merit basis but on sports quota of rifle shooting. After a brief stay there in 1989-90, he did his BA from Rollins College, Florida in 1994. Just for doing BA one need not go to the US. The very next year, in 1995 he got M.Phil. degree from Trinity College, Cambridge. The genuineness of this degree is questioned as he has done M.Phil. without doing MA. Amaratya Sen’s helping hand is thought to be behind. Many of you might have seen the famous movie “Munna Bhai MBBS”.

In 2008 Rahul Gandhi was prevented from using an auditorium of the Chandra Shekhar Azad University in Kanpur for a students’ rally. Subsequently, the Vice-Chancellor of the university, V.K. Suri, was ousted by the UP Governor. During 26/11 when the whole country was tense about how to tackle the Mumbai terror, Rahul Gandhi was lavishly partying with his friends till 5 AM. Rahul Gandhi advises austerity for all Congress members. He says it is the duty of all politicians to be austere. On the other hand he has a ministerial bungalow with a fully equipped gym. He is a regular member of at least two of the Delhi’s poshest gyms, one of which is 5-star rated.

Rahul Gandhi’s trip to Chennai in 2009 to campaign for austerity cost the party more than Rs 1 Crore. Such inconsistencies show that initiatives taken by Rahul Gandhi are not his own but, workout of his party men only.

During the 2007 election campaign in Uttar Pradesh, Rahul Gandhi said that “if anyone from the Nehru-Gandhi family had been active in politics then, the Babri Masjid would not have fallen”. It doubtlessly shows his Mohammedan affiliation as a loyalty to his ancestors. On Dec 31, 2004, John M. Itty, a retired college professor in Alappuzha district of Kerala, contended that action should be taken against Rahul Gandhi and his girlfriend Juvenitta alias Veronica for staying together for three days at a resort in Kerela. It is a criminal offense under Immoral Trafficking Act as they are not married. Anyway, one more foreigner daughter-in-law is waiting to rule the tolerant Indians.

The Swiss magazine Schweizer Illustrierte’s 11th November 1991 issue revealed that Rahul Gandhi was the beneficiary of accounts worth US $2 billion controlled by his mother Sonia Gandhi. A report from the Swiss Banking Association in 2006 revealed that the combined deposits of Indian citizens are far greater than any other nation, a total of US $1.4 trillion, a figure exceeding the GDP of India. This dynasty rules greater than half of India. Ignoring the center, out of 28 states and 7 union territories, more than half of them have Congress government at any point of time. Up to Rajiv Gandhi there was Mughal rule in India, with Sonia Gandhi, the Rome rule on India have started. The objective behind writing this article is to acquaint the citizens of India with their national leaders and show how a dynasty has misused the democracy of this country. Several prestigious national assets and schemes are named after these lose-character people to immortalize them. Many other shocking facts are not presented in this article because of lack of supporting evidence.

==

“REVERSE EVANGELISM” !!! – LETTER TO TNIE

From: balakrishnan hariharan <hbalakrishnan@yahoo.com>
Date: 31 January 2012 13:14
Subject: “REVERSE EVANGELISM” !!! – LETTER TO TNIE

Dear Sir,

Reference the report –  ” Indian missionaries swamping the West ” – (TNIE – 30 Jan)

The reason for this is not far to see !!

 

As far back as 1964, Bates M. Searle and PAUL K Wilhelm in their –  “CHRISTIANITY IN EUROPE : THE PROSPECTS OF CHRISTIANITY THROUGHOUT THE WORLD” wrote about the decline of Christianity in Europe. As examples, they highlighted the state of Christianity in the following countries:

(A) – “Great Britain.  Unless new factors do enter the situation, the institutional decline of the Churches in those older neighborhoods of Britain which are themselves declining will continue.” – – – . “Statistics of Church attendances show that not more than 10% of the population is likely to be in Church on any given Sunday.”

 

(B) – “Scandinavian Countries. The situation in the Scandinavian countries is not unlike that in Britain, though alienation from the Church seems to have gone further – – –  a strange deep regard for the Christian tradition; and at the same time empty Churches.”

 

(C) – “Switzerland.  Switzerland presents many of the same features of Scandinavia. Even in the city of John Calvin, not more than 5% of the Protestant population will be found in Church on a Sunday morning.”

 

(D) –  “Netherlands. The Netherlands is a land of paradoxes. A great proportion of the population than in any other European country declares itself in the census returns to belong to no religious community at all.”

 

(E) –  “Germany. No strong prophetic voices are to be heard from the Churches.”

 

Continuing, the authors wrote about Europe : “ There are no signs of a great revival of spiritual life, nowhere have the Church broken through a broad front into the newly paganised world. There is much perplexity as to how the Gospel should be preached, indeed as to whether the Church had a message at all for the man of today.” 

 

As regards the ‘Land of Liberty’, the well known commentator, Fareed Zakaria, in his – ” THE FUTURE OF FREEDOM”, wrote, about the desperate attempts by the ‘Bible Belt’ evangelists to keep the ‘Flock together’ ; ” In the process of expanding, Falwell and others like him discovered that the easiest way to attract a mass audience was to mimic mainstream culture and values, giving people what they want, which is less religiously demanding and more warm and service oriented Christianity. – – – . Evangelical Churches are now designed to blend in perfectly with ‘modern consumerist America”. AGAIN. “Faith as hedonism was a sublimal message of the Pentacostal evangelists Jim and Tammy Faye Baker.- – – .To practice what they preached the Baker’s built a 2300 acre THEME PARK,- HERITAGE U.S.A.- proudly called a ‘Christian Disneyland.’ Replete with  shopping malls etc “. In short- religion reduced to a commercial venture!!

 

Staying with the ‘Land of Liberty’, Lisa Miller in a ‘wonderful’ treatise published in the daily – ‘The Daily Beast’ – on 14 Aug 2009, and entitled : ” We Are All Hindus Now “ , wrote:

” The Rig Veda, the most ancient Hindu scripture, says this: “Truth is One, but the sages speak of it by many names.” A Hindu believes there are many paths to God. Jesus is one way, the Qur’an is another, yoga practice is a third. None is better than any other; all are equal. The most traditional, conservative Christians have not been taught to think like this. They learn in Sunday school that their religion is true, and others are false. Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth,
and the life. No one comes to the father except through me.”

Again. ” Americans are no longer buying it. According to a 2008 Pew Forum survey, 65 percent of us believe that “many religions can lead to eternal life”—including 37 percent of white evangelicals, the group most likely to believe that salvation is theirs alone. Also, the number of people who seek spiritual truth outside church is growing. Thirty percent of Americans call themselves “spiritual, not religious,” according to a 2009 NEWSWEEK Poll, up from 24 percent in 2005″.

In his ” PSYCHOLOGY OF PROPHETISM AND A SECULAR LOOK AT THE BIBLE.” (1993),  Dr. Koenraad Elst, the noted Begian historian  wrote :

 

“ Anyone who cares to look, can see that Christianity is in steep decline. This is especially the case in Europe, where Church attendance levels in many countries have fallen below 10% or even 5%. In most Christian countries (ie, with the exception of some frontline areas of the mission), the trend is the same, even if less dramatic. Even more ominous for the survival of Christianity, is the decline in priestly vocations. Many parishes that used to have two or three priests now HAVE NONE, so that Sunday services have to be conducted by a visiting priest, who has an even fuller agenda as his colleagues keep dying, retiring, or abandoning priesthood without being replaced. The average age of Catholic priests in the world is 55. In the Netherlands it is even 62, and increasing– — . The fact is modern people just are’nt very interested anymore in practicing Christianity.”

AGAIN. “- — – but the fundamental reason for the decline is intrinsic to the Christian faith.- – -. The central defining element in Christianity that cannot possibly be saved, is the composite doctrine of prophetic monotheism. The notion that there is a SINGLE GOD, CREATOR of the Universe, who is interfering with His Creation, by sending messages to privileged spokespersons called ‘prophets’, flies in the face of rationality. People will accept that reason isn’t everything, but not that your central belief system is so militantly opposed to reason.”

Dr. Elst gives the example of Dr. Herman H. Somers. a Jesuit priest. He wrote:

” He studied in Leuven and Rome, and is an M.A. in Philosophy, Ph.D. in Classical Philology (i.e. Latin and Greek), Ph.D. in Theology, and Ph.D. in Psychology.  For forty years he was in the Jesuit order.  He had worked as a schoolteacher, journalist for the Jesuit-led paper De Linie, lecturer in Classical Philology and in Psychology, practicing psychopathologist in a mental asylum, before he went on to devote 25 years to scientific research.  He has been active in a variety of research projects, from noise ecology and experimental psychology to pioneering work in computer-aided mathematical text analysis of the Bible.

As he studied the Bible more closely, he developed doubts about its divine character.  In the face of unexpected findings inconvenient to the faith, he refused to renounce scientific standards, and drew his conclusions. In what he describes as a painful process, he grew away from the Christian faith, and left the Jesuit order.  Pro-Jesuit sources claim that it is only because of his unwillingness to comply with his vow of poverty (concretely: renouncing the family property in favor of the order after his mother died) that he has left the order.

In 1986, he published the book: Jezus de Messias: was het Christendom een Vergissing? (“Jesus the Messiah: was Christianity a Mistake?”).1 Written in Dutch, it is an abridged version of a more technical study in French, which he sent to a number of experts and interested parties, among them the Vatican.  It is a ground-breaking exploration of the psychopathological syndromes accurately described in the New Testament, especially of Jesus’ mental condition.

In June 1990, he published a more voluminous sequel, this time also dealing with the Old Testament prophets.  It is called: Toen God sliep, schreef de mens de Bijbel.  De Bilbet belicht door een psycholoog (Dutch: “When God slept, man wrote the Bible.  The Bible explained by a psychologist”). We hope that it will soon be translated into all major languages, and meanwhile we will offer a summary of the book’s most striking points.

Since then, Dr. Somers has also written a history of the Jesuit order, a psychological study of Mohammed, and a study of the Jehovah’s Witnesses “.

And, the Indian ‘Harvesting’ scene is best captured by Sir Mark Tully, the former BBC Station Chief in New Delhi, in his most readable – ” No Full Stops in India “. He wrote : ” The bulk of their converts came from the untouchable community and the tribes. One Roman Catholic friend of mine still refers to Harijan converts as ‘POWDER MILK CHRISTIANS’, and there is no doubt that these people- the poorest of the poor were attracted by the MISSIONARIES’ PROMISES TO FEED THEIR BODIES, RATHER THAN THE PROSPECT OF SPIRITUAL NOURISHMENT.”

It is against the foregoing canvas, should one view the message of the Pope John Paul II’s statement during the Papal High Mass on November 8′ 1999 in New Delhi, which also happened to be Deepavali – “The first millennium saw the cross planted in the soil of Europe, and the second in America and Africa. May the Third Christian Millennium witness a great harvest of faith on this vast and vital continent”.

 

This, on a State visit, at the invitation of the then ‘COMMUNAL’ NDA Govt. !!

VANDE MATARAM

Warm Regards

H. Balakrishnan

“ATHREYA”
A1/8 – Flat: 5
22nd Cross Strert
Besantnagar
Chennai – 600 090

TEL: 24910140

आशा भोंसले का तमाचा

From:

Dr. Ved Pratap Vaidik dr.vaidik@gmail.com

 

आशा भोंसले का तमाचा 

02 फरवरी 2012 : आशा भोंसले और तीजन बाई ने दिल्लीवालों की लू उतार दी| ये दोनों देवियाँ ‘लिम्का बुक ऑफ रेकार्ड’ के कार्यक्रम में दिल्ली आई थीं| संगीत संबंधी यह कार्यक्रम पूरी तरह अंग्रेजी में चल रहा था| यह कोई अपवाद नहीं था| आजकल दिल्ली में कोई भी कार्यक्रम यदि किसी पांच-सितारा होटल या इंडिया इंटरनेशनल सेंटर जैसी जगहों पर होता है तो वहां हिंदी या किसी अन्य भारतीय भाषा के इस्तेमाल का प्रश्न ही नहीं उठता| इस कार्यक्रम में भी सभी वक्तागण एक के बाद एक अंग्रेजी झाड़ रहे थे| मंच संचालक भी अंग्रेजी बोल रहा था|

जब तीजनबाई के बोलने की बारी आई तो उन्होंने कहा कि यहां का माहौल देखकर मैं तो डर गई हूं| आप लोग क्या-क्या बोलते रहे, मेरे पल्ले कुछ नहीं पड़ा| मैं तो अंग्रेजी बिल्कुल भी नहीं जानती| तीजनबाई को सम्मानित करने के लिए बुलाया गया था लेकिन जो कुछ वहां हो रहा था, वह उनका अपमान ही था लेकिन श्रोताओं में से कोई भी उठकर कुछ नहीं बोला| तीजनबाई के बोलने के बावजूद कार्यक्रम बड़ी बेशर्मी से अंग्रेजी में ही चलता रहा| इस पर आशा भोंसले झल्ला गईं| उन्होंने कहा कि मुझे पहली बार पता चला कि दिल्ली में सिर्फ अंग्रेजी बोली जाती है| लोग अपनी भाषाओं में बात करने में भी शर्म महसूस करते हैं| उन्होंने कहा मैं अभी लंदन से ही लौटी हूं| वहां लोग अंग्रेजी में बोले तो बात समझ में आती है लेकिन दिल्ली का यह माजरा देखकर मैं दंग हूं| उन्होंने श्रोताओं से फिर पूछा कि आप हिंदी नहीं बोलते, यह ठीक है लेकिन आशा है, मैं जो बोल रही हूं, उसे समझते तो होंगे? दिल्लीवालों पर इससे बड़ी लानत क्या मारी जा सकती थी?

इसके बावजूद जब मंच-संचालक ने अंग्रेजी में ही आशाजी से आग्रह किया कि वे कोई गीत सुनाएँ तो उन्होंने क्या करारा तमाचा जमाया? उन्होंने कहा कि यह कार्यक्रम कोका कोला कंपनी ने आयोजित किया है| आपकी ही कंपनी की कोक मैंने अभी-अभी पी है| मेरा गला खराब हो गया है| मैं गा नहीं सकती|

क्या हमारे देश के नकलची और गुलाम बुद्घिजीवी आशा भोंसले और तीजनबाई से कोई सबक लेंगे? ये वे लोग हैं, जो मौलिक है और प्रथम श्रेणी के हैं जबकि सड़ी-गली अंग्रेजी झाड़नेवाले हमारे तथाकथित बुद्घिजीवियों को पश्चिमी समाज नकलची और दोयम दर्जे का मानता है| वह उन्हें नोबेल और बुकर आदि पुरस्कार इसलिए भी दे देता है कि वे अपने-अपने देशों में अंग्रेजी के सांस्कृतिक साम्राज्यवाद के मुखर चौकीदार की भूमिका निभाते रहें| उनकी जड़ें अपनी जमीन में नीचे नहीं होतीं, ऊपर होती हैं| वे चमगादड़ों की तरह सिर के बल उल्टे लटके होते हैं| आशा भोंसले ने दिल्लीवालों के बहाने उन्हीं की खबर ली है|

==