Truth and Christianity

Truth and Christianity.                                                        January 2005.

 

Tilak B. Shrestha, Ph.D.   < >                                             

 

Satyam eva jayate – Truth always triumphs.

Socrates – unexamined truth is not really truth.

 

Nepalese proverbs:

Dhateko kura, kate pani mildaina. Artha ni bartha, Gobinda gai.

Mero goru ko barhai takka. Khai na pai, chhala topi lai.

 

[I had the dubious honor of meeting a few Nepalese missionaries claiming to be theology scholars. This article is in response to our conversation on Christianity. Please feel free to make any comments and to forward it to interested friends.]

 

I respect all the people and all the religions. I also expect respect to be mutual. However, the missionaries come with a simple proposition, “Brother, your God is no God, only my God is God. Sister, all Christians go to heaven, no matter how evil. Brother, every body else goes to hell, no matter how virtuous. Sister, all your ancestors have gone to hell. Brother, if you want to go to heaven, you better believe and do whatever I tell you.” Should not a person with any intelligence and integrity ask, “How come?” Wayne Johnson, Pastor of First Baptist Church, Orlando, Florida, 1988, writes, “Hinduism of India, yoga, meditation, psychological therapy and self-help are the lies first told by the serpent in the Garden of Eden.” The Southern Baptist Church published booklets condemning Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Native African religions in 1999. Should not some body stand up and yell, “He you, Emperor, you have no cloth?” We Nepalese are poor, so what? Is poverty of mind or money? When I was studying in Florida, I was challenged many times over by all kinds of Christian activists – Southern Baptists, Catholics, Mormons, Evangelists, Presbyterians, Seventh day Adventists and Ninth day Ciphers as well. They made me curios enough to read about Christianity. If any body tries to preach over me now, I do tell them real truth about Christianity. Truth is antidote to these aberrations. I am a student of science, not of theology. I have only passing interest in religion. However, I have not met any bright theologian yet. I wonder why? I think it is because only in theology the ridiculous doctrines are defended. Only in theology, the theories are not created out of facts, but facts are twisted to fit the theories. Only in theology the doctrines, not the truth, are sacrosanct. Please do point out any errors in objective facts and logic used here. I remain grateful.

 

I do assume that every body is interested about truth in general; and theologians in the truth about Christianity in particular. I expect theologians to have a general knowledge about all the religions and Dharmas. I also expect scholars to be intellectually honest, to make opinion according to the facts and to have respect for the truth. I also expect theologians coming from Nepal to know some thing about Buddha Dharma and Hinduism in general. If you have all the time to read Bible, but have no time to read our own. Is it because of some deep seated psychological inferiority complex? You even did not read Bible objectively. Otherwise you would know both the stories that Jesus was born in Bethlehem are demonstrably lies.

 

What Christianity is all about? Jesus taught to love our neighbors and even enemies. I do appreciate Jesus, and his teachings of universal love. That precisely Christianity is not about. Suppose there was a Jew who heard Jesus ‘a Jewish Rabbi’ preaching and practiced loving neighbors and enemies. Then according to Jesus and all the right thinking people he will go to heaven. However, according to Christianity he will go to hell. True or not? Be honest.

 

According to Christianity only way to heaven is to ‘believe’ that ‘Jesus is Christ’, or else you stand condemned. Here is the defining doctrine of Christianity:

John 14:6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.

Acts 4:12 Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.

Timothy 2:5 For there is one God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus

John 3:16-18 For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son. Whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. But he who does not believe is condemned already.

 

This is the crux of the problem. To hold a belief, whether it is true or not, does lead to nowhere. What happens if you believe two plus two is ‘four’ or ‘seven’? Nothing really. You do not go to heaven or hell by believing ‘this’ or ‘that.’ As a scholar, how do you connect the belief ‘Jesus is Christ’ with sins being forgiven and going to heaven? This absurd Christian fundamental doctrine leads to the conclusion that all your good and honorable non-Christian parents and all your ancestors have gone to hell. True or not? I do not think so, nor you should. Believing a fact is relevant only and to the extent the fact is used in making a decision. For example if you buy a ten dollar worth of item believing you have same amount of money, then you will be embarrassed, nonchalant, or happy if you really have nine, ten or eleven dollars. If you are playing tennis then believing in ten dollars is irrelevant. God created and loves all of us regardless of our color, race, gender, nationality and religion. Good guys go to heaven and bad guys go to hell – a simple metaphor. You go to heaven by practicing ‘good heart inside’ and ‘good deed outside.’ The mantra ‘be good, do good’ leads to heaven. Being a Jew, a Christian, a Hindu, a Buddhist, a Muslim or an Atheist makes no difference. Any way, on what basis do you believe the Christian doctrines? What facts and reason do you base upon? Because, ‘believing’ is not a voluntary act. Look at a dog and see if you could believe it a cat, then a camel. By the way, Jesus is evidently not the Christ.

 

Jesus paid for our sin? Not really, it is a pure wishful thinking. What a delusion and attempt at irresponsibility. A sin cannot be transferred. A crime can not be paid by some body else, much less before the event. It leads to the absurd conclusion that you can do any crime you want to. It is already paid for by Jesus. What if we forget to commit crime? See if you can transfer your headache or a bad school grade to Jesus. See if you can talk police into keeping your retired father-in-law in prison now and you doing commensurate crime later. Consider the Biblical doctrine of scapegoats paying for other’s crime. Imagine a prison full of goats and sheep doing time in lieu of other convicts. It is such a mind-boggling absurdity. Christianity offers only a false sense of security and wishful escapism. The natural or divine law is each of us has to face the consequences of our own deeds, both bitter and sweet.

 

Jesus was sacrificed for our sin? As a theologian perhaps you can explain it properly. Who sacrificed Jesus? To whom? Does God demand sacrifice of a lamb or his own son to forgive us? Or God sacrificed his own son for us? To whom? Can not God forgive us without the stunt of sacrificing his own son? What happens to all the humanity before Jesus, or the multitudes of non-Christian people? Do you think torture and murder of a lamb or a person a good idea? How does that please God? How does it serve any purpose? How does such sacrifice result in forgiving sin? Is not taking a life another ethical crime? How a crime will pay for another crime? Be honest.

 

Jesus died and resurrected? Not really. Jesus resurrected proving he is God. He is God therefore he was able to resurrect. What a classical tautology or the circular argument. How can God die? Is not immortality the hallmark of God? God sustains the whole world. God is beyond birth and death. If God dies then the whole world will cease to exist. Will it not? His disciples saw him crucified and later he visited them. If they were of normal intelligence, first question they would have asked Jesus would have been, “How did you survive?” However, they assumed he died and resurrected. It merely means they were not so bright after all. Given their circumstances and educational level that may be understandable. How about us? Are not we primary school graduates? Take the one half of the tautology that Jesus resurrected because he is God. So far it is plausible. However, Christianity states ‘whoever believes so will also resurrect.’ You do not have to be a God to resurrect, but mere believing ‘Jesus’s resurrection’ suffice. Try this: Whoever believes Jimmy Carter was President, is also a President. What about resurrection? According to Christianity, all and only Christians will come back alive with all his or her body restored to original form, and live for ever. Suppose there is a fat, bald and old Christian. Perhaps he does not want to live like that for eternity. Perhaps he wants to be a gorgeous and sexy woman. Do you want him to condemn for eternity to be a fat, bald, old and married to a cross-eyed woman? Can you imagine poor Hitler living for eternity with shame and embarrassment hanging on his face for loosing the war, if not for commencing? What kind of heaven Christianity envisage without Socrates, Pythagoras, Einstein, Gandhi, Buddha, your parents and friends; but with Hitler and Mussolini? Personally I wish to achieve salvation that is beyond birth and death. However, the important issue is ‘births and deaths are natural events’, ordained by God in this world. Resurrection is merely a wishful thinking without any basis.

 

Another Christian doctrine is so-called the ‘Original sin’. I think if a person commits crime then only he or she should be punished, not any other innocent people. However, according to Christianity, Adam committed the crime of eating the apple of knowledge, therefore we all are born in sin and will go to hell. You may rest assured babies are not criminals and we are all born pure. It violates the most fundamental principle of justice. Which, even a dog understands. For example if two of us were walking together and I happen to kick a stray dog. Then the dog will try to bite me, not you. Because the dog understands that I am guilty and you are innocent.

 

This doctrine is the product of Paul’s manipulation of a sensible Greek mythology ‘Adam and Eve being the parent of all humanity’, that is we are all one family ‘Bashundhaiva Kutumbakam’, to a nonsensical guilt trap. Why is eating ‘Apple’ of knowledge a sin? Rather eating ‘Orange’ of ignorance is. Do not we all go to school? Believe me, God wants us to be educated and wise.

 

Thus, Christianity fits the swindling ‘the good cop and the bad cop’ model. A strong man comes in with a dumb story but with a big threat. Then another comes along to help you out of the threat. The weak-minded person is relieved from the threat and is obliged to the second. Here comes the Adam and the Original Sin, that you are guilty and born in sin. Then comes the Jesus who pays for it. All of sudden you are obliged to Jesus. Truth is a person cannot be punished for another’s crime. Neither we are responsible for Adam’s sin, nor Jesus can pay for ours. Such swindling technique works only on weak-minded fools. Is it about seeking truth or spirituality? None whatsoever.

 

The doctrines of the ‘original sin’ and the ‘scapegoat’ get even better. Bigger the crime, larger the sacrifice. From a lamb it goes all the way to an elephant, a whale, a man, and ultimately God. To pay for the ‘original sin’, not only you need Jesus, but he also has to be unblemished or sinless. According to the Bible the original sin is transmitted from father to children. The ancient Jews consider the father as the giver of seed or life, and the mother merely an incubator. Thus, Jewish lineage comes strictly from the father, and the mother is irrelevant. They also thought sex to be inherently bad. Thus, children born normally are impure. Therefore the doctrine of the ‘immaculate conception’ is important to satisfy both conditions of purity. The baby Jesus does not have human father, and Mary is still virgin. Matter of fact, she remains virgin even after having a number of children with Joseph. However, the doctrine is contrary to another Biblical requirement that the Christ has to be the direct descendant of King David. Some theologians even tried to circulate the seven dollars bill that Mary is the descendant of David, not acceptable to Jewish custom. Contradictions and irrationalities are not problems for the Church as long as people believe them. However, the progress in human knowledge brought another problem. In the nineteenth century, even the enemies of Galileo realized that the mother not only provides nutrition but also provides life equal to the father. In that case Jesus is still impure through his mother side. To avoid such predicament, the Roman Catholic Church in 1854 stated as article of faith that Mary had been conceived without the original sin that affects all humanity. To emphasize Mary’s purity and non-affliction from the original sin, Pope Pius XII in 1950 declared that at her death Mary’s body and soul both went to heaven. However, the humble and inconvenient question remains, “How did Pope find out, and why not earlier?” This is a classical case of incoherent doctrine inventing facts. By the way, the ‘article of faith’ means to believe without thinking or questioning.

 

The myth that God dies and comes back alive is a recurrent theme in many of the old world religions. Egypt has the story of ‘Osiris’, in Greece ‘Dionysis’, in Asia Minor ‘Attis’, in Syria ‘Adonis’, in Italy ‘Bacchus’ and in Persia ‘Mithra’. These myths are centuries older than Christianity. Thus Christian myth is not an original but a poor plagiarism. Once Christianity has the political and military hold of the Europe it wiped out the other religions. The genocide of Pagan Europeans, destruction of old European religions, arts, literatures, philosophies, books are the hideous and yet ignored history of Europe. This is how Christianity paid for the tolerance of pre-Christian Europe. Today’s European descendants can only look at the ‘ruins’ of their glorious past. A Pagan philosopher Celsus, 2nd century AD, criticized Christians for trying to pass Jesus’s story as original when in fact it is a poor copy of Pagan myths, “Why Pagan story is myth and Christian story is true? Nothing is unusual about Christian belief, except that it excludes larger truth of God.” In response to such criticism, Church came with the doctrine of ‘Diabolical mimicry.’ Theologians like Justin Martyr and Tertullian, 2nd century AD, explain, “Devil knew about Jesus’s life before it happened. To confuse people he created all the other myths long before Jesus was born.” Did some body ask how they came to know? Perhaps Devil told them so. Christianity stands on these kinds of arguments.

 

Yet another Biblical doctrine is about the covenant between God and Jewish tribe. Do you think we human beings are equal to God to have a legal contract? It is as comical as having legal paper signed between a man and a horse. How do you enforce the contract if God renegades? In which court? One of the covenants stipulates that Jewish tribe will obey Mosaic code and the God will make the tribe always victorious in battles. Is it historically true? How about Diasporas? Do you think only concern of God is to look after one tribe and beat on others? Are we Jews? How about we Nepalese? If there is a war between Jews and us, which side you will be and which side God will be? Obviously so called covenant is a ploy to militarize Jewish tribe. It is not about seeking truth or spiritual practices. By the way, any body can approach God through simple love.

 

These facts may be interesting to theologians and lay people alike. The relevant references are given below.

 

1. Jesus’s biological father is a Roman soldier named ‘Panthera.’

2. When Jesus was growing up people used to make joke about his parentage. It led him to develop a mild form of psychological disorder called ‘paraphrenia’, which makes him very sensitive toward poor, exploited and down trodden.

3. When he was about 13 years old he followed the ancient Silk Road and went to India. He studied in many places including Benaras and Leh Monastery, Kashmir. He became a well-known scholar trained mostly in Buddha Dharma and other Hindu traditions. He was important enough to be mentioned in the ‘Rajtarangini’, a royal chronicle of Kashmir Kings. His way of addressing God as ‘Father’ is directly from the ‘Dwaita – duel’ tradition of Hindus. For example – ‘Tomeva Maata, Cha Pita tomeva. Thou art mother, and thou art father.’ Jews address God as ‘Lord.’ His statement ‘Kingdom within’ is directly from ‘Adwaita – non-duel’ tradition of the inner meditation. These concepts are quite foreign to Jews and they took them merely as parables.

4. When he was of late twenties he came back to Israel, a well-educated and charismatic Rabbi. He was also a Jewish nationalist and opposed Roman occupation. He also claimed to be the ‘Christ’, as understood by Jewish people then. He did not claim to have come to establish a new religion, nor biological-son of God, nor to take away other’s sin. They are the wishful thinking added later.

5. He was able to start an armed rebellion against Romans, albeit a minor one. Romans crucified him for that rebellion, a standard Roman punishment.

6. He was on cross, only for a few hours and survived. You may check with your physician friends if nailing in wrists, not palms, for a few hours will result in death or not.

7. He met his disciples and told them that he will escape to India and return for them later.

8. He returned to India, married, had children and died of old age. He was buried in Shrinagar, Kashmir. The temple built on his burial site exists even today. There are people who claim to be his descendant even today.

9. His disciples, all of them practicing Jews, vainly waited for his return. Current Christianity has nothing to do either with Jesus or his disciples.

10. Present Christianity, with all the absurd wishful doctrines, is the brainchild of Paul, who never met Jesus. And matter of fact, Jesus’ disciples including his brother James accused him of telling lies.

11. The Christian theme that Jesus came to take away others sin is neither taught by Judaism, nor by Jesus. It is the doctrine of Mithraism, where Lord Mithra pays for and forgives the sins of his believers. This copy and concoction of Paul is what you call Christianity today.

 

What is spirituality? It is about search for the truth and practices of improving ones inner values. Believing ‘Jesus is Christ or not’ is irrelevant, for that matter neither believing ‘Fat Buddha’ is. By believing so, what profound truth you came to know? How did it improve your spiritual values? Whether ‘Jesus is Christ or not’ is important only to the Jews. If he was really Christ, then they were obliged to obey and fight for him as a God appointed King towards liberation of Israel. It is a political issue. We are Nepalese. Is it our problem? Do not we have our own problems? ‘Khai na pai, Chhala topi lai.’

 

So what are Bible and its prophets? Contrary to the claims, Bible is not a scripture, nor the prophets divinely inspired individuals. Actually Bible is a subjective political history of Jewish people and prophets are their community\political leaders. They are interesting historical documents but not spiritual works. A scripture is about universal principles and spiritual practices. History of how Jewish tribe got into bondage, their freedom, in turn how they massacred Caananites and took over their land is interesting but does not qualify as a spiritual treaty. Merely spicing up the text by sprinkling a handful of words ‘God’ does not change the inherent characteristics. A prophet is judged by the content of his message, not by his claims. Please do compare these two statements: a. Newton is a great scientist because his theories are proven correct, and b. I believe Newton is a great scientist therefore I believe whatever he says. First is about the way of ‘Apple’, and second is about ‘Orange.’

 

A prophet may walk down the hill or come out of a cave and claim that he was told by God to tell you what God wants. Did you wonder why is it a mountain or a cave but not a rest room? Why there are fires, thunders, lightening on the side? They are dramatic effects to avoid simple questions. It is the trick in trade of all magicians, kings, dictators and professional wrestlers. If God really talked to the prophet, good for him, but not good enough for me. He may have heard God directly, but for me it is only hear say. I am sure God is perfectly capable of telling me directly. Prophet hood is nothing more than hood winking gullible people to be controlled by the Prophet. It can be easily recognized by the so called divine statements coming out of the prophet. They are nothing but political assertions given the circumstances. For example, according to Moses God tells, “I am your God, helped you out of Egyptian bondage, gave Canaan land to you, worship only me, do not worship other Gods, else I am jealous.” May we ask how they got into Egyptian bondage in the first place? Is this God only of Jews, not of Egyptian? God forbid, if the God is also of Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites et al. According to Bible, God says, ”You shall annihilate them – Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites, Jebusites ….“ According to so-called divine urging Jews went and massacred all the Canaanites and took over their land. Is this how divine gift is given? Can God be in competition against other Gods and be jealous? Moses is a great Jewish leader, no doubt; but not a spiritual Mahatma. Given the circumstance, Moses have done the wonderful job of keeping discipline and leading the desperate Jewish tribe. But spade is a spade. The scenario is perfectly explainable if considered that God did not create Moses, rather Moses created God. Moses led Jews out of Egyptian bondage, engineered massacre and take over of Canaan land. He wants full control of Jews and would not like them to listen to others. Otherwise he is jealous.

 

There is an anecdote of an amateur singer trying to impress a music teacher. The teacher commented, “You really sing well. All you need to do is improve on the rhythm and the melody.” Christianity is a great religion, with problems of being false and dangerous. Consider the definitions: superstition – believing without facts, and brain washing – believing against facts. Christianity is merely a brain washing system by promoting wishful thinking. The danger of Christianity is that it does not allow people to do critical analysis. To be led by nose-rings looks good only on bullocks. To be led by bridles looks good only on horses. To parrot what was told to you or stated in Bible without any critical examination does not look good on intellectuals like you. Remember Socrates, “Unexamined truth is not truth.” If it is able to delude scholars like you, think of its devastating effect on the superstitious masses. Here are a few issues typically posed by missionaries for your meditation.

 

 

A. All the Christian countries are rich and good, non-Christian countries are poor:

 

Not true. Presently Japanese economy and per capita income are higher than that of comparative countries – Germany, Britain and France. According to the study by the CIA, the Chinese economy will be the world’s largest within next 15 years. By the way, USA like India is not a Christian but a secular nation. If you insist on claiming it to be a Christian country then perhaps you may also claim that God gave this land to the Native Americans and Christians stole it. However, what religion got to do with money or power? Are you assuming that Jesus was millionaire, if not billionaire? It is the intellectual bankruptcy and Christian propaganda to equate prosperity with soundness of a religion. In fact the internal consistencies, teachings of profound truths and traditions of spiritual practices are the parameters. Can you elaborate such measures about Christianity? If the means and the end of Christianity is mere believing ‘Jesus is Christ’, then what else is there to meditate and practice?

 

Europe did progress not because of but in spite of Christianity. Once Christianity got hold of Europe in the 3rd century, it destroyed all its illustrious heritage of countless sages like Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Euclid and who not. Christians literally burnt away all their pre-Christian heritage and dragged Europe down to the dark age of thousand years. Do you want to do same in Nepal? Scholar like Giordano Bruno was burnt alive because he said ‘the Earth revolves around the Sun.’ If you have any regards for truth and freedom of thoughts then you should mourn the martyrdom of Bruno, not Jesus. Christianity has the singular dubious honor of terrorizing Europe and world with inquisition, crusades and holocaust. Inquisition tortured and burnt alive literally millions of women. It was institutionalized by the Pope Innocent. Innocent? What a hideous joke. The crusades killed millions of Europeans and Muslims. Then it started to devour Christians them self. The war between Catholics and Protestants lasted literally centuries. The early American pioneers are mostly the persecuted Christians from Europe. These persecuted American forefathers knew the horror of Christianity too well to make sure that its ugly head does not rise here too. Their wisdom bloomed as the doctrine of the separation of the church and the state. Today’s liberal Europe is not because of the Christianity but because of the countless modern social thinkers like John Locke and others. Their ideas of human liberties and the social contracts are diametrically opposite to totalitarianism of Christianity. Is the scourge of Christianity is really gone in this modern age? The Jew baiting, progrom and holocaust of Jewish people in the 20th century is the direct result of anti-Semitism taught by the Churches from the very beginning of its creation. The Biblical lie ‘Jesus was not killed by Romans, but by Jews’ fully blossomed as the holocaust where educated and civilized Germans systematically murdered millions of Jews in industrial assembly lines. Guess from where such hatred and motivation comes from. What an irony to note that Jesus was a Jew. Churches were active not in saving Jewish victims, but the Nazi war criminals. Even today in USA, look how Churches try to poke their nose in politics, where it does not belong. These enemies of first amendment are dying to inject religion in government. They do not hate Ayatollah Khomeini but envy; because he was able to create a theocratic country. The American Christian fundamentalists are quite active for Israel. Because they believe that the second coming of Jesus requires the Kingdom of Israel. By the way, what is wrong with the first coming? Guess what happens when Jesus comes back? Jesus will send all the Jews to the fiery hell. Then whole world will be destroyed. Please write me e-mail when that happens. Then only Southern Baptists will be resurrected. Which denomination do you belong to? Bible states that there are only 144,000 seats in the heaven. Before joining Christianity perhaps you should check the queue first. Please call guys with long white coats.

 

The European renaissance beginning in 14th century is basically European revolt against Christianity. That paved way for the era of enlightenment, in spite of the enemies of Galileo. The 18th century on ward the mercantile capitalism and ensuing industrial revolution transformed Europe. Otherwise both the main Asian countries China and India were ahead of Europe, both in terms of economy and social institutions. However, the unholy mix of capitalism and the Fascist nationalism led to exploitation of the poor within Europe, slavery of African countries, and colonization of Asian and American countries. Exploitation of the colonies and forced accumulation of capital by European powers largely explains their industrialization and the current lopsided distribution of the wealth. The economic model of industrialization through colonization is the root cause of both world wars of the 20th century.

 

Shares (%) of World Manufacturing Output, 1750-1900.

Year                1750    1800    1830    1860    1880    1900

Europe             23.1     28.0     34.1     53.6     62.0     63.0

UK                    1.9       4.3       9.5     19.9     22.9     18.5

Tropics            76.8     71.2     63.3     39.2     23.3     13.4

China               32.8     33.3     29.8     19.7     12.5       6.2

India                24.5     19.7     17.6       8.6       2.8       1.7

Source: adapted from B R Tomlinson, Economics: The Periphery in Andrew Porter (ed), The Oxford History of the British Empire: the Nineteenth Century, Oxford 1990.

 

The story of 20th century is basically the struggle of European labor against capitalist exploitation; and the struggle of Afro-Asian countries for freedom from, shall I say, Christian countries. When did Churches spoke against exploitation? They are more interested in making money and forced conversions. Many of the colonized countries still are not able to put the devastation behind. History is witness that the Churches opposed modernization in one hand and supported the exploiters against the exploited on the other. You might have heard about Churches practicing racial segregation but not a squeak for the freedom and democracy. Have you? When did Churches oppose slavery? As a matter of fact Churches have used Bible to explain away and justify slavery. Do you think Pope is leading a spiritual movement? Think again. He is sitting on a multi-billion dollar worth of financial and business empire. Yet, he has audacity to claim representing Jesus, who would have given his last penny to the poor. Why go that far, find out assets of your Church. Then find out how much it takes in from and spends out on the poor. Facts will speak for it self.

 

 

B. Christianity is true because it believes in not many but one God who tells what to do:

 

Not true. There is no physical proof that God exists, let alone the number of Gods. So the monotheism and the polytheism have same validity. To claim there is only one God and feel superior about it is ridiculous in both counts. However, polytheists are not hostile to Gods of other people. One more God is always welcome. The Roman\Greek Pagans or Indian Hindus do not attack other religionists. But adherents of Semitic monotheists invariably attack and try to convert or destroy people of other religions. Because, the Semitic monotheism is not about merely believing number of Gods being one. It is about straight jacketing humanity in to a certain belief system and behavior pattern. The Semitic religions are basically social institutions for tribal survival. They are not about seeking truth or improving spirituality.

 

Polytheism comes with the premise that there are many spiritual ways. It is a matter of personal interest and choice to follow any of them. The bottom line is the freedom of thinking and believing. However, Semitic monotheism comes with the premise that only their way is correct and other ways are inherently evil and must be destroyed. The bottom line is the brain washing and the totalitarianism. This predatory nature of the Semitic monotheism has destroyed the European Paganism, Persian Zoroastrianism, and many of the old religions of Egypt, North Africa, Black Africa, Polynesia, Australia and Americas. Buddha Dharma is wiped out from South-West Asia and Hinduism survived with many wounds. We need to understand the root cause of this unequal battle between the carnivores and the herbivores. They are the genesis of Judaism and the Semitic monotheism.

 

There are two problems inherent in any tribal societies including Jewish one. They are the intra-tribe and the inter-tribe struggles. A Jew may fight another Jew, or his tribe may have to fight another tribe. Jewish leaders tackled both problems by militarizing their tribe using religion as the tool. Thus, Judaism is the cultural evolution towards tribal survival, not about declaration of the universal principles. Judaism cements individuals of the tribe with strict rules and makes the tribe formidable force against others. The intra-tribe aggression is strictly forbidden and the aggression is collectively externalized against other tribes. A Jew may not kill or rob another Jew but obliged to do so to other non-Jews (Goyim, man-animals). The laws are to be enforced at the pain of death – by stoning in this life and eternal damnation after.

 

With this cultural innovation Jewish tribe was able to wipe out other competing tribes. Who could argue against the success and characteristics of the Judaism was set. However, it also traps people into taking religion strictly in terms of military success against others. This is the root cause of Christian and Islamic aggression against other religions. This leads to several problems. First they miss the true sense of the spirituality as search for truth and practices of internal growth. Second, the fixation also takes away critical thinking and at worst produces neurosis. Third, it keeps people of one religion perpetually antagonizing others. Fourth, a military defeat will have far reaching consequences.

 

Thus, the Semitic monotheism is not about the principle of ‘universality of divinity’ or of seeing ‘unity in diversity’. It is about denying other viewpoints and cultural existence. The concept of ‘your God is no God, only my God is God’ is not about knowledge, but about struggle for tribal supremacy. The Islam, a medieval, improved and aggressive version of Judaism begins with the proclamation, “I bear witness that there are no other Gods, but only Allah.”

 

In contrast, Roman and Greek pantheon of Gods live like a family. Devotees of Apollo will also pay obeisance to Hera, let alone fight her devotees. A Hindu traveling from India to west will find likeness of Hindu god Indra in Greek god Zeus and Roman god Jupiter. He is not about to fight with the devotees of Zeus or Jupiter. He will understand them as manifestations of same divinity in different cultural settings. He will also expect such manifestations in other countries and cultures. Hinduism defines God as “Neti” or not that. That is, no matter how you define God, not that. In other words, God is unlimited and our intelligence and faculties are limited. Therefore our definition of God necessarily has to be partial and personal. How many ways God may be visualized? As many as human beings. Therefore there cannot be hostility between two views of God. For example, bestowing knowledge to younger generation is a universal phenomenon. It is not limited to the human specie. Even cats and dogs teach their off springs. Perhaps a boulder teaches a cobble. That universal essence may be worshiped as the ‘Goddess of learning.’ Same thing with the universal need of protection and we have the ‘Goddess of protection.’ These are merely two views of the same universal divinity. These two views are not hostile but complementary to each other.

 

One mistake we do is to consider all the religions being basically same. That way we are putting apples and oranges together. Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism etc. are not religions but Dharmas, and are about methods of spiritual advancements. On the other hand, semitic religions are about tribal survival, militarization of society, believing sets of doctrines without questioning, social control and totalitarianism. Most of the major world struggles are not due to the practices of spirituality, but due the totalitarianism. The practice of Dharmas are like joining college to get education. The joining religions are like joining army. For example, in Nepal we go to Buddhist, Saiva, Vaishnav or any other temples routinely. In China people go to Taoist or Buddhist or Confucius temples as they please. Now try being a Christian for two days, a Muslim for three days and a Jew for two days of a week. You will not be appreciated, to say the least. Because it is like being a soldier of American army for two days, Russian army for three days and so forth. The distinction between institutions producing scholars versus soldiers must be made.

 

C. Bible teaches us about God, Christ, Holy Ghost and nature of God:

 

What is the real truth then? In Abraham’s time people in the Middle East celebrated many Gods collectively known as ‘Baal.’ Their celebrations coincided with the agricultural cycle. Gods were supposed to grant protection and prosperity. The people also had the concept of Gods being territorial. That is equivalent of having God of Denver, God of Atlanta and so forth. People of Atlanta will be celebrating the God of Atlanta more than the God of Denver of course. However, they were not hostile against other Gods. If the King of Denver battles against King of Atlanta, he of course will pray to the God of Denver and assume that the God of Denver is stronger than the God of Atlanta. Same thing is done by King of Atlanta, albeit in the reverse order. The difference of opinion is usually settled in the battlefield. After ward they revert back to the normal setting. Obviously these different Gods or ‘Baal’ represent different level of tribal and territorial nationalism. Once the Jewish tribes were subjected to Diaspora, they had to redefine God representing people, not necessarily a territory. It is a ploy to safeguard the migrant nationalism. Also people did not think in terms of monotheism that there is only one God. They meant that their God is better than others. It is mostly political expression.

 

Abraham claimed to profess allegiance strictly to only one God of Israel, as opposed to praying many of them. It may be noted that Abraham is not claiming there is only one God in the world, but that he chose to align with one single deity among many. It is necessary to have allegiance with only one God for militarization of the society. A soldier cannot profess allegiance to more than one army. Compare that with the freedom of a student to study any subjects. Biblical expressions like, “I am jealous God. Thou shall have no other God before me”, are the ploys to keep dissenting Jews in check. Will God be jealous? Jealousy of what? Another God’s new car?

 

The concept of ‘Christ’ comes from the legend of ‘Krishna’ of the Hindu pantheon. Hindus believe that God incarnated as Krishna to teach the ‘Karma Yoga.’ It may be noted that the lesson of ‘Karma yoga’ is primary and the belief in incarnation is only secondary. However, it is also believed Krishna to state that whenever world is in pain; he will incarnate to heal it. It is a universal declaration of love of God for its creation, not a political statement. In those ancient times, though difficult, people did migrate. The people migrating to the Middle East from the east were collectively known as Hebrews. One sub-group of such Hebrews is ‘A-Brahman’. They were the erstwhile Hindu ‘Brahmans’ who quit rigors of Brahmanism and migrated to the west. In Sanskrit, the prefix ‘A’ is used to negate. Thus, ‘A-Brahman’ means ‘no longer Brahmans.’ This is the origin of the Jewish name ‘Abraham’. This group also carried the promise of Krishna as their legend. The word ‘Krishna’ Hellenized to ‘Chrisnos’. Greek language tends to substitute ‘T’ for ‘N’, and it became ‘Christos’. Similar interesting phonetic substitution in Japanese is ‘R’ for ‘L’ and in Chinese ‘L’ for ‘R’. You might have heard Chinese noodle and ‘lice’, and Japanese version of democracy and election. The Greek word ‘Christos’ became ‘Christ’ in Hebrew. The meaning of the legend also changed with the new environments. As Jewish tribe adopted the monotheism the ‘Christ’ became a man, not God; a messiah, appointed by God for a specific task. After the accent of King David, his political need further changed the definition of ‘Christ’ to the final Jewish term: a descendant of King David, appointed by God to lead Jewish people towards freedom of Israel, and reclaiming Davidic throne. This definition is believed by Jewish people and claimed by Jesus. By the way, ‘Jesus’ is known as ‘Yesu’, ‘Yusuf’, ‘Isa’ etc. in different languages.

 

The idea of ‘Holy Ghost’ comes from the philosophy of Heraclitus, circa 500 BC, Greece. He philosophized that the world is not random. He noted whether in society or in nature there is orderliness and the inner workings are governed by known or unknown logic. There is cosmic logic is every thing. He urged to understand and abide by such logic. He termed it ‘Logos’ in Greek. In the 3rd century AD, the neo-Platonist philosophers gave it a new twist. They thought God does not come to the world. Otherwise, they reasoned, God’s presence would transform the world to Utopia. However, God does help humanity using ‘Logos’ as the agent. Thus ‘Logos’ got the personality and a job to carry out God’s errands. The Biblical phrase ‘Word is with God’ is the miss-translation of that doctrine. The Jewish philosopher Philo (1st century BC) adopted this Greek idea. John the Baptist learned it from Philo and passed on to Jesus. Jesus taught the idea to his disciples. However, Judaism teaches strict monotheism without any other divine agents. The disciples of Jesus could not reconcile these two mutually exclusive teachings; and the ‘Logos’, or ‘Word’, or ‘Holy Ghost’, or ‘Holy Spirit’ was left unemployed.

 

It brings to the Christian definition of God given as the Nicene Creed. Wise men agree that it may be one view of God, but not the only view. However, Nicene Creed is not about insight into the divine reality, but about a political compromise under a royal decree. The Roman Emperor Constantine, a non-Christian, had to deal with the political aspects of having three religions in his empire – Paganism, Mithraism and Christianity. Both Paganism and Mithraism have trinity and the winter solstice as their main holiday. The winter solstice is the day when Sun’s southern journey ends and northern journey begins. It symbolizes rejuvenation in the nature and the divine power, and also the day of Apollo and Mithra. Christianity was then a smallest sect with no trinity and no distinct holiday. The emperor wanted to have the trinity and a single holiday to be celebrated by all the three religions together. It was a political ploy towards unity of his empire. Thus to bring Christianity in line with other two religions, Constantine convened and presided over the Christian council in 325 AD, in Nicea. Christianity then following Judaism had only one God. Jesus supposed to be God’s son. The nature of Jesus was not well defined. Literally there were dozens of Christian sects subscribing to different natures of Jesus. The mother Mary had some prominence and followers. But the Christian leaders were misogynic enough to dismiss her from any divine part. The basic problem was how to reconcile between the Constantine’s demand of trinity and the monotheism of Christianity’s Judaic root. Constantine summarily kicked any Bishops out who would not agree with his demand. The council played around with different scenarios and finally came with compromise declaration that there are ‘three’ male or neuter Gods of ‘one’ substance. God is ‘Triune’, three equal persons in one deity – Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. The unemployed Holy Ghost finally got a job. If you cannot explain this parody of three in one God, then it is a divine mystery. It was not acceptable to many Christians. Father Arius, a prominent Christian scholar, refused to endorse the creed. Constantine banished him and soldiers took care of other disagreeable scholars. The symbiosis went further. The winter solstice also became the birthday of Jesus. The Pagan festival of fertility and rejuvenation became Christmas. Their symbolic pole became Christmas tree. The spring equinox, correlating to Sun’s return to prominence and Mithra’s ascension, became Easter. Christians took over the Mithraic temple in Vatican as their Catholic Church. The Christian chief adopted the Mithraic high priest’s title of ‘Pope’. Guess what happened to Mithraism? In 394 AD, king Theodosius I passed edict making all paganisms including Mithraism illegal at the pain of death. This is the bitter truth of Christianity. However, the basic question remains, “Can a person or a council define God?” Like the proverbial camel designed by a committee, the Nicene Creed is a political compromise, not a vision of divinity.

 

Next time you profess the Nicene Creed in a Church, look serious do not laugh; and please wink for me.

 

 

 

References:

 

Arnheim, Michael. 1984. Is Christianity true? Prometheus Books, New York.

Baagil, H.M. 1984. Christian – Muslim Dialogue. Revival of Islamic heritage society. Kuwait.

Baigent, Michael and Richard Leigh. 1991. The dead sea scrolls deception. Jonathan Cape Publishers. London.

Bamback, Richard K. 1983. Responses to creationism. In “Science”, Volume 220.

Bowden, Henry W. 1981. American Indians and Christian missions. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago.

Burr, William H. 1987. Self-contradictions of the Bible. A. J. Davis and Company. NY.

Capra, Fritjof. 1988. The Tao of Physics. Bantam Books. New York.

Carrier, Dr. Richard. 2011. Why I Am Not a Christian: Four Conclusive Reasons to Reject the Faith. Philosophy Press, Richmond, CA.

Chisti, Yousuf Saleem. 1970. What is Christianity? The world federation of Islamic missions. Karachi, Pakistan.

Ellerbe, Helen. 1999. The dark side of the Christian history. Morningstar and Lark. Orlando, Florida.

Elst, Koenraad. 1993. Psychology of Prophetism: A secular look at the Bible. Voice of India Publication. New Delhi, India.

Faber-Kaiser, A. 1977. Jesus died in Kashmir. Gordon and Cremonies Company. London.

Freke, Thomas and Peter Gandy. 1999. The Jesus Mysteries: Was the original Jesus a Pagan God. Three Rivers Press. New York.

Dawkins, Prof. Richard. 2008. The God delusion. Bantam Press, Britain

Gardner, Laurence. 2003. Bloodline of the Holy Grail. Barnes & Noble Books. NY.

Gaskin, J.C.A. (editor). 1989. Varieties of unbelief – from Epicurus to Sartre. MacMillan Publishing Company. New York.

Goddard, Dwight. 2000. Was Jesus influenced by Buddhism? Book Tree Publishers. Thetford, Vermont.

Harris, Marvin. 1974. Cows, Pigs, Wars, and Witches. Vintage Books. New York.

Isherwood, Christopher (editor). 1961. Vedanta for Western world. Vedanta Press. Hollywood, California.

Kalopoulos, Michael. 2003. Biblical religion: Great Lie. Xlibris Publishing House.

Kersten, Holger. 1986. Jesus lived in India. Element Book Ltd. England.

Kirsch, Jonathan. 2004. God against the Gods: The history of the war between monotheism and polytheism. Viking Compass Publishing Company.

Lapide, Pinechas and Jurgen Moltmann. 1979. Jewish Monotheism and Christian Trinitarian doctrine. Fortress Press. Philadelphia.

Loftus, John W. and Dan Barker. 2010. The Christian Delusion: Why Faith Fails. Prometheus Books, NY

McKitrick, Eric L. (editor). 1963. Slavery Defended. Prentice Hall Inc. New York.

Nelson-Pallmeyer, Jack. 2001. Jesus against Christianity: Reclaiming the missing Jesus. Trinity Press International.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1972. The Antichrist. Arno Press and the New York Times.

Nikhilananda, Swami (translator). 1984. The gospel of Sri Rama Krishna. Ramakrisha – Vivekananda Center. New York.

Pagels, Prof. Elaine. 2003. Beyond Belief: The secret gospel of Thomas. Random House Publishers.

Potter, Rev. Dr. Charles F. 1962. The lost years of Jesus revealed. Fawcett Publishing Company. Connecticut.

Prabhavananda, Swami. 1963. The sermon on the mount according to Vedanta. Vedanta Press. Hollywood, California.

Russell, Bertrand. 1957. Why I am not a Christian. Simon and Schuster Company. NY.

Russell, Bertrand. 1989. Wisdom of the West. American Humanist Association. NY.

Samartha, Stanley J. 1974. The Hindu response to the unbound Christ. The Christian Literature Society. Madras. India.

Smith, Huston. 1958. The religions of man. Harper Colophon Books. New York.

Srinivasan, Rajeev. August, 2002. The Predatory State. In “India Abroad.” http://www.indiaabroad.com/news/2002/aug/16rajeev.htm

Sutherland, Charles W. 1987. Disciples of Destruction. Prometheus Books. New York.

Talreja, Kanayalal M. 2000. Holy Vedas and holy Bible: A comparative study. Rashtriya Chetana Sangathan, New Delhi, India.

Tigunait, Pandit Rajmani. 1983. Seven systems of Indian philosophy. The Himalayan International Institute of Yoga Science and Philosophy of the USA. Pennsylvania.

Wells, Prof. George A. 1989. Who was Jesus? A critique of the new testament record. Open Court Publishing Company. Chicago, Illinois.

Wells, Prof. George A. 1999. The Jesus Myth. Open Court Publishing Company. Chicago, Illinois.

Christian Propaganda in Nepal

From: Tilak B. Shrestha < >

 

Background: On July 14, 2012 we were invited to watch a documentary on Nepal made by an American family who speak Nepali and lived in Nepal for a few years. To our surprise, the documentary “Priti ko malik – Priti’s master” is a Christian propaganda designed for conversion. The movie begins with a Nepali father selling his daughter ‘Priti’ of about 10 years old to a cruel master. Nepalese are depicted as poor, cultureless, valueless and Dharmaless people. The poor girl has to work hard, wear burlap cloth and beaten often. She finds a friend – a lady primary school teacher. The teacher is a Christian missionary and teaches 7 or 8 years old pupils not humanities or science but Christian doctrines that ‘Jesus is the only salvation.’ She converts Priti to Christianity. The cruel master finally beats Priti so bad that she dies. As Jesus she was dead in her mud hut for 3 days. The teacher buries her. The cruel master repents and converts to Christianity. Then there was the invasion of heathen Japanese army in Nepal. The ‘never happened event’ is lamely explained that it happened in Philippines. Japanese soldiers order the master to bow to the Japanese King’s photo. He refuses on the ground that he bows only to Jesus. Japanese soldiers execute the master and make him a Christian martyr.

==

 

July 22, 2012

 

Dear missionaries

Jon Cloud Jee <joncloudabc@yahoo.com>

Brian Snider Jee BKSnider@GMail.com

 

Namaste

Thanks for inviting to watch your Christian propaganda documentary “Priti ko malik.” It depicts Nepalese people as poor, cultureless, valueless and Dharmaless people; and Christianity as the only salvation. Such one way propaganda is not acceptable. There has to be a dialogue – both ways.

Yes, presently we are poor. It is just a matter of historical cycle. But we are not cultureless people. For example, we do not invite guests and insult them. Our civilization goes back to the pre-historical time of Shiva. Even King Janak and Princess Sita of Ramayana were almost a thousand years before Adam and Eve (4006 BC). By the way, that is where Cain got his wife. In the ‘Deluge’ even the Himalayan range was 3 feet under the water. For whole year we had to stand on hill tops to survive, and all others perished. We still call that the ‘year of cold butt.’ And that is why all the good people today are descendants of the Himalayan people.

I recognize you both are missionaries of Baptist – Christian religion. However, you may notice that we practice Dharma not religion. We have many Dharmas in Nepal like Buddha dharma, Shiva dharma, Vishnu dharma etc, which are collectively known as Hindu dharma or Hinduism. Dharma is not religion. Dharma is about seeking truth ‘Satya’ and spiritual practices ‘Yoga.’ A religion is about social innovation for tribal survival through militarization of society. Thus religion and Dharma acts in different planes. For example, you cannot be a Christian and a Muslim, but can be a Christian and a Buddhist same time.

Here are three articles to explain the basics of Dharma: ‘Dharma and religion’, ‘Karma – theory and practice’, and ‘Gnan yoga – Way of knowledge.’ You are welcome to learn, ask questions or write criticisms.

 

In the same token here are a few questions on Christianity. Please do respond.

A. Truth is – good people go to heaven, bad people go to hell. On the contrary, Christianity states, “All Christians go to heaven, no matter how evil. And all others go to hell, no matter how virtuous.”

John 14:6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.

 

Acts 4:12 Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.

 

John 3:16-18 For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son. Whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. But he who does not believe is condemned already.

 

Accordingly, all your non-Christian ancestors are in hell. Is it true? Do you agree?

Let me tell you, they were virtuous and are in heaven.

B. Truth is – a person may practice ‘good heart’ inside and ‘good deed’ out side to go to heaven. Any beliefs, true or not, are irrelevant. Compare it with the Christian doctrine that a mere belief ‘Jesus is Christ’ will open heaven for you. If you do not believe it then you go to hell. Do you agree? Can it be true?

C. Truth is – sins are not transferable. A person has to face the consequences of the person’s deeds, good for good, and bad for bad. Like school grades or head aches they cannot be wished away to others. On the contrary, Christian doctrines state that the original sin of Adam\Eve is transmitted to all humanity and thus babies are born in sin. Jesus pays for other’s sin, even for the crimes which are not even committed yet. Do you agree? Can it be true?

D. The doctrine comes from the Jewish superstition and practice that you can transfer your sins to an ‘escape goat.’ Jews sacrifice or slit throat of a poor sheep to God. They believe that would incur divine justice of punishing the sheep instead of the real criminal. Do you agree? Can it be true? Same concept is blown that God himself sacrificed his own son Jesus to pay for our sin. Here is a question. God sacrificed Jesus? To whom?

E. Jesus was a nice guy, a great spiritual master, a Buddhist scholar who lived most of his life in India and died in Shrinagar, Kashmir, India. Even today there is a temple where he is buried and people claiming to be his descendants.

F. Jesus’s teachings are mostly based upon Buddha and Shiva dharma traditions. His sublime teachings like ‘love even your enemies’ is most admirable. But Jesus’s teachings are not the central message of Christianity. For example, what happens to Jewish people who actually met Jesus and practiced his preaching ‘love all?’ According to Christianity, they all will go to hell merely because they do not believe ‘Jesus is Christ.’ Do you agree? Can it be true?

I am a science student, not a theologian. However, tons of material is available on the authenticity of Christianity or lack of it. I am giving a few below. Please help yourself. If you have any questions please feel free to contact.

Sincerely,

 

Tilak B. Shrestha, Ph.D.

Huntsville, Alabama, USA

===

 

A. Jesus’s life and burial place in India and his teachings

 

Parallels between Gautama Buddha and Jesus

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallels_between_Gautama_Buddha_and_Jesus

 

BBC Documentary – Jesus was a Buddhist monk

 

Buddhism and Christianity

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism_and_Christianity

 

Jesus as a Reincarnation of Buddha

http://www.near-death.com/experiences/origen045.html

 

Jesus in India – life and burial place

 

BBC Documentary – Jesus in India

 

Govt of India Documentary on Jesus in Kashmir

 

B. Why Jews say, ‘Jesus is not Christ.’

http://www.aish.com/jw/s/48892792.html

 

C. What Nepalese need to know about Christianity

Inquisition and torture tools, 50 million tortured to death.

Discovery Channel – Machines of Malice – The Inquisition

Millions of Native Americans were Killed by Christians – Hopi Chief

American Holocaust of Native American Indians

 

 

D. Objective study of Bible and Christianity

Bible scholar, Prof. Bart Ehrman, University of North Carolina, leaves Christianity

 

The truth about Bible exposed by a Bible scholar, Prof. Bart Ehrman

 

Christian Delusion – Dr. Richard Carrier

Dr. Richard Carrier, Rapture Day

 

Debunking the Jesus Myth, Prof. Robert M. Price, Ex-Baptist minister,

Johnnie Coleman Theological seminary

 

The core of the Jesus myth – Christopher Hitchens

 

Penn & Teller – Bible, real facts, Part 1

 

Penn and Teller – Creationism, Part 1

 

Prof. Richard Dawkins – The God Delusion

 

The God Delusion – Prof. Richard Dawkins, Part 1/5

 

Prof. Richard Dawkins on Christian doctrine of blood atonement

 

Dr. Sam Harris on Christianity

 

Real proof that Jesus was not real

Jesus did not exist, Part 1/7

 

“Did Jesus Exist?” Dr. Richard Carrier (Funny with x rated language)

The Jesuit Oath (Can it cause peace in the world?)

From: Tilak Shrestha < >

THE JESUIT OATH
By Carlos Didler

http://members.aol.com/gregscv/jesuit.htm
Landmark Independent Baptist Church

http://members.aol.com/libcfl/

P.O. Box 847  11150 NE 113th Place  Archer, Florida 32618

When a Jesuit of the minor rank is to be, elevated to command, he is conducted into the Chapel of the Convent of the Order, where there are only three others present, the principal or Superior standing in front of the altar. On either side stands a monk, one of whom holds a banner of yellow and white, which are the Papal colors, and the other a black banner with a dagger and red cross above a skull and crossbones, with the word INRI, and below them the words IUSTUM, NECAR, REGES, IMPIOUS. The meaning of which is: It is just to exterminate or annihilate impious or heretical Kings, Governments, or Rulers. Upon the floor is a red cross at which the postulant or candidate kneels. The Superior hands him a small black crucifix, which he takes in his left hand and presses to his heart, and the Superior at the same time presents to him a dagger, which he grasps by the blade and holds the point against his heart, the Superior still holding it by the hilt, and thus addresses the postulant:

Superior:

My son, heretofore you have been taught to act the dissembler: among Roman Catholics to be a Roman Catholic, and to be a spy even among your own brethren; to believe no man, to trust no man. Among the Reformers, to be a reformer; among the Huguenots, to be a Huguenot; among the Calvinists, to be a Calvinist; among other Protestants, generally to be a Protestant, and obtaining their confidence, to seek even to preach from their pulpits, and to denounce with all the vehemence in your nature our Holy Religion and the Pope; and even to descend so low as to become a Jew among Jews, that you might be enabled to gather together all information for the benefit of your Order as a faithful soldier of the Pope.

You have been taught to insidiously plant the seeds of jealousy and hatred between communities, provinces, states that were at peace, and incite them to deeds of blood, involving them in war with each other, and to create revolutions and civil wars in countries that were independent and prosperous, cultivating the arts and the sciences and enjoying the blessings of peace. To take sides with the combatants and to act secretly with your brother Jesuit, who might be engaged on the other side, but openly opposed to that with which you might be connected, only that the Church might be the gainer in the end, in the conditions fixed in the treaties for peace and that the end justifies the means.

You have been taught your duty as a spy, to gather all statistics, facts and information in your power from every source; to ingratiate yourself into the confidence of the family circle of Protestants and heretics of every class and character, as well as that of the merchant, the banker, the lawyer, among the schools and universities, in parliaments and legislatures, and the judiciaries and councils of state, and to ‘be all things to all men,’ for the Pope’s sake, whose servants we are unto death.

You have received all your instructions heretofore as a novice, a neophyte, and have served as co-adjurer, confessor and priest, but you have not yet been invested with all that is necessary to command in the Army of Loyola in the service of the Pope. You must serve the proper time as the instrument and executioner as directed by your superiors; for none can command here who has not consecrated his labors with the blood of the heretic; for ‘without the shedding of blood no man can be saved.’ Therefore, to fit yourself for your work and make your own salvation sure, you will, in addition to your former oath of obedience to your order and allegiance to the Pope, repeat after me—-

The Extreme Oath of the Jesuits:

 “I, _________ now, in the presence of Almighty God, the Blessed Virgin Mary, the blessed Michael the Archangel, the blessed St. John the Baptist, the holy Apostles St. Peter and St. Paul and all the saints and sacred hosts of heaven, and to you, my ghostly father, the Superior General of the Society of Jesus, founded by St. Ignatius Loyola in the Pontificate of Paul the Third, and continued to the present, do by the womb of the virgin, the matrix of God, and the rod of Jesus Christ, declare and swear, that the holiness the Pope is Christ’s Vice-regent and is the true and only head of the Catholic or Universal Church throughout the earth; and that by virtue of the keys of binding and loosing, given to his Holiness by my Savior, Jesus Christ, he hath power to depose heretical kings, princes, states, commonwealths and governments, all being illegal without his sacred confirmation and that they may safely be destroyed. Therefore, to the utmost of my power I shall and will defend this doctrine of his Holiness’ right and custom against all usurpers of the heretical or Protestant authority whatever, especially the Lutheran of German, Holland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and the now pretended authority and churches of England and Scotland, and branches of the same now established in Ireland and on the Continent of America and elsewhere; and all adherents in regard that they be usurped and heretical, opposing the sacred Mother Church of Rome. I do now renounce and disown any allegiance as due to any heretical king, prince or state named Protestants or Liberals, or obedience to any of the laws, magistrates or officers.

I do further declare that the doctrine of the churches of England and Scotland, of the Calvinists, Huguenots and others of the name Protestants or Liberals to be damnable and they themselves damned who will not forsake the same.

I do further declare, that I will help, assist, and advise all or any of his Holiness’ agents in any place wherever I shall be, in Switzerland, Germany, Holland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, England, Ireland or America, or in any other Kingdom or territory I shall come to, and do my uttermost to extirpate the heretical Protestants of Liberals’ doctrines and to destroy all their pretended powers, regal or otherwise.

I do further promise and declare, that notwithstanding I am dispensed with, to assume my religion heretical, for the propaganda of the Mother Church’s interest, to keep secret and private all her agents’ counsels from time to time, as they may entrust me and not to divulge, directly or indirectly, by word, writing or circumstance whatever; but to execute all that shall be proposed, given in charge or discovered unto me, by you, my ghostly father, or any of this sacred covenant.

I do further promise and declare, that I will have no opinion or will of my own, or any mental reservation whatever, even as a corpse or cadaver (perinde ac cadaver), but will unhesitatingly obey each and every command that I may receive from my superiors in the Militia of the Pope and of Jesus Christ.

That I may go to any part of the World withersoever I may be sent, to the frozen regions of the North, the burning sands of the desert of Africa, or the jungles of India, to the centers of civilization of Europe, or to the wild haunts of the barbarous savages of America, without murmuring or repining, and will be submissive in all things whatsoever communicated to me.

I furthermore promise and declare that I will, when opportunity presents, make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly, against all heretics, Protestants and Liberals, as I am directed to do, to extirpate and exterminate them from the face of the whole earth; and that I will spare neither age, sex or condition; and that I will hang, waste, boil, flay, strangle and bury alive these infamous heretics, rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women and crush their infants’ heads against the walls, in order to annihilate forever their execrable race. That when the same cannot be done openly, I will secretly use the poisoned cup, the Strangulating cord, the steel of the poniard or the leaden bullet, regardless of the honor, rank, dignity, or authority of the person or persons, whatever may be their condition in life, either public or private, as I at any time may be directed so to do by any agent of the Pope or Superior of the Brotherhood of the Holy Faith, of the Society of Jesus.

In confirmation of which, I hereby dedicate my life, my soul and all my corporal powers, and with this dagger which I now receive, I will subscribe my name written in my own blood, in testimony thereof; and should I prove false or weaken in my determination, may my brethren and fellow soldiers of the Militia of the Pope cut off my hands and my feet, and my throat from ear to ear, my belly opened and sulphur burned therein, with all the punishment that can be inflicted upon me on earth and my soul be tortured by demons in an eternal hell forever!

All of which, I, _______________, do swear by the Blessed Trinity and blessed Sacraments, which I am now to receive, to perform and on my part to keep inviolable; and do call all the heavenly and glorious host of heaven to witness the blessed Sacrament of the Eucharist, and witness the same further with my name written and with the point of this dagger dipped in my own blood and sealed in the face of this holy covenant.”

(He receives the wafer from the Superior and writes his name with the point of his dagger dipped in his own blood taken from over his heart.)

Superior:

“You will now rise to your feet and I will instruct you in the Catechism necessary to make yourself known to any member of the Society of Jesus belonging to this rank.

In the first place, you, as a Brother Jesuit, will with another mutually make the ordinary sign of the cross as any ordinary Roman Catholic would; then one crosses his wrists, the palms of his hands open, and the other in answer crosses his feet, one above the other; the first points with forefinger of the right hand to the center of the palm of the left, the other with the forefinger of the left hand points to the center of the palm of the right; the first then with his right hand makes a circle around his head, touching it; the other then with the forefinger of his left hand touches the left side of his body just below his heart; the first then with his right hand draws it across the throat of the other, and the latter then with a dagger down the stomach and abdomen of the first. The first then says Iustum; and the other answers Necar; the first Reges. The other answers Impious.” (The meaning of which has already been explained.) “The first will then present a small piece of paper folded in a peculiar manner, four times, which the other will cut longitudinally and on opening the name Jesu will be found written upon the head and arms of a cross three times. You will then give and receive with him the following questions and answers:

Question—From whither do you come?
Answer—The Holy faith.

Q.—Whom do you serve?
A.—The Holy Father at Rome, the Pope, and the Roman Catholic Church Universal throughout the world.

Q.—Who commands you?
A.—The Successor of St. Ignatius Loyola, the founder of the Society of Jesus or the Soldiers of Jesus Christ.

Q.—Who received you?
A.—A venerable man in white hair.

Q.—How?
A.—With a naked dagger, I kneeling upon the cross beneath the banners of the Pope and of our sacred order.

Q.—Did you take an oath?
A.—I did, to destroy heretics and their governments and rulers, and to spare neither age, sex nor condition. To be as a corpse without any opinion or will of my own, but to implicitly obey my Superiors in all things without hesitation of murmuring.

Q.—Will you do that?
A.—I will.

Q.—How do you travel?
A.—In the bark of Peter the fisherman.

Q.—Whither do you travel?
A.—To the four quarters of the globe.

Q.—For what purpose?
A.—To obey the orders of my general and Superiors and execute the will of the Pope and faithfully fulfill the conditions of my oaths.

Q.—Go ye, then, into all the world and take possession of all lands in the name of the Pope. He, who will not accept him as the Vicar of Jesus and his Viceregent on earth, let him be accursed and exterminated.”

T’he Jesuit Oath of Induction is also recorded in the Congressional Record of the U.S.A. (House Bill 1523, Contested election case of Eugene C. Bonniwell, against Thos. S. Butler, Feb. 15, 1913, pp. 3215-3216)

The Oath of a Catholic Priest
By John Lyons, ex-catholic priest in a tract circulated in Glenside, Pa.

“I do declare from my heart, without mental reservation. That the Pope is Christ’s vicar-general and is the true and only head of the Universal Church throughout the world, and that by virtue of the Keys of binding and loosing given to his Holiness by Jesus Christ, he has power to depose heretical kings, princes, states, commonwealths and governments, all being illegal without his sacred Confirmation, and that they may safely be destroyed. Therefore, to the utmost of my power, I will defend this doctrine and his Holiness’ rights and customs against all usurpers of the Protestant authority whatsoever, especially against the now pretended authority of the Church of England and all adherents, in regard that they may be usurped and heretical, opposing the Sacred Mother, the Church of Rome.

I do renounce and disown any allegiance as due to any Protestant king, prince, or state, or obedience to any of their inferior officers. I do further declare the doctrine of the Church of England, of the Calvinist, Huguenots, and other Protestants, to be damnable and those to be damned who will not forsake the same.

I do further declare that I will help, assist, and advise, all or any of his Holiness’ agents, in any place wherever I shall be, and to do my utmost to extirpate the Protestant doctrine and to destroy all their pretended power, regal or otherwise. I do further promise and declare that, notwithstanding, I may be permitted by dispensation to assume any heretical religion for the propagation of the Mother Church’s interest, to keep secret and private all her agents’ counsels as they entrust to me, and not to divulge, directly or indirectly, by word, writing, or circumstances whatsoever, but to execute all which shall be proposed given in charge, discovered unto me by you my most Reverend Lord and Bishop.”

Links to know Islam

From: Tilak Shrestha < >

Islam:

1. Islam Destroyed Ancient Universities of India

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wF-pqIyI6Q

 

2. Destruction of Bamiyan Buddhas by the Taliban
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwMSo60oIKY

3. The Hindu genocide that Hindus and the world forgot
http://www.indiatribune.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2105&Itemid=524

4. Indian genocide – Killed 80 MILLION
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IstZSgniH8

5. Hindu Genocide in East Pakistan
http://www.hindunet.org/hindu_history/modern/hindu_bangla.html

6. Al Quida slaughters 12 Nepalese hostages by beheading in Iraq
http://mhking.mu.nu/archives/043570.php
7. Hindu bashing in Pakistani School books
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nXl5Hr2Aho&NR=1&feature=endscreen

8. Hindu Bashing in Mainstream Pakistani Media
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neEvPBYdxfk&feature=relmfu

9. Pakistan: Hindu Girls forced to convert to Islam and marry Muslim men
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dEjxy63DXY&feature=related

10. Forced Conversion of HINDU Girls in Pakistan : ISLAM on SWORD
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBiRTZIbBoc&feature=related

Links to know about Christianity

From: Tilak Shrestha < >

Christianity:

1. Conversion and inquisition of Hindus in Goa:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z52DlTuvsdo

 

2. Conversion by cheating:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2V8sAH3Ok8

 

3. Christian Terrorists & Missionaries are Converting Hindus:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGNuv2JJbLI

 

4. Missionary activities in India:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8xx37Z-wjM

 

5. Inquisition and torture tools, 50 million tortured to death.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rx8PdvOELvY

6. Discovery Channel – Machines of Malice – The Inquisition
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bci-cAGMwts&feature=related

7. Millions of Native Americans were Killed by Christians – Hopi Chief
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLe1SqHtihA

8. American Holocaust of Native American Indians
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTrbVf6SrCc&feature=related

 

The need for a Kafir (or Hindu) Social media Task Force

The need for a Kafir (or Hindu) Social media Task Force

By Skanda987

 

The process for winning or success is many times same for all the persons, or small or large groups, communities or nations. The Islamists are very active to wipe out kafir cultures and spread Islam and Sharia all over the world by all possible means, including terrorism. An example is below article where an Islamist describes a process to form an Islami Social Media Task Force.  The kafir groups or communities or nations can also use the same process or improved process.  In the below article read “Hindu or kafir” where ‘Muslim” word is written, and the process will be ready for kafirs or Hindus.

 

Jai sri krishna!

-Skanda987

===

 

 

(Islamic) Social Media Task Force

Written by Executive Director Faizan Syed

http://ztruth.typepad.com/files/prosecuteantiislamwww-cair-stlouis-com-1.pdf

 

Need for Muslim Social Media task force

As for those who think may have realize by now the power of social media, especially in recent days when mainstream electronic media boycotted the carnage of Rohingya Muslims. Experts are saying that the days of Electronic and print media are numbered, very soon social media will take over and it will play a vital role in shaping public opinion.

US military is fully exploiting this new technology to their advantage, read this article published in New York Times last year in November: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/18/world/us-military-goesonline-to-rebut-extremists.html?_r=1&;;pagewanted=all

Rand Corporation a think tank that works for Pentagon released a report a while ago suggesting that US should invest 20 billion dollars in coming years to drive the public opinion in it’s favor especially in war zones like in Afghanistan, Iraq and anywhere else where the anti western sentiments are high.

The need now for the Muslim community is to take heed and realize the urgent need to establish Muslim Social media task force which will monitor internet and counter the negative and anti Islam and Anti Muslim narratives instantly and in an efficient manner,

One lesson to be derived in this regard is the strategy adopted by Israeli government, it is training Jewish students from around the world and training them in Journalism and media monitoring.

Here is one example of the training American Jewish organizations is offering in US: http://www.theisraelproject.org/site/c.hsJPK0PIJpH/b.2540123/k.318F/TIPDC_Media_Fellowship_Details.htm

I have few suggestions to make in this regard.

An association of Muslim Youth should be created, they be trained in media monitoring and response and in media relations (See above link of Jewish organization for further details)

These Youth should be encouraged to be passionate, aggressive and prompt in their responses.

There need at least one such team in every country (I know it’s a daunting taks, but one small steps takes us to bigger one)

They should coordinate with other Muslim youth operating in different countries.

Report anti Islamic and anti Muslim content on the internet to appropriate authorities to take action to remove it and go after those who post it online and prosecute and take actions according to the Shariah ruling.

Highlight the inconsistencies of the mainstream media and spread it across the web using social networking and all other platforms available to us.

Highlight the bias of media in reporting issues pertaining to Islam and Muslims

Write to editors and journalist reporting on Islam and on Muslim issues (Believe it does have an impact)

Send mass emails out promptly urging Muslims to respond on news reports that is bias and anti Islamic in nature to the editors and journalist and TV anchors.

Promote books, documentaries, movies that is of beneficial to the Muslim youth.

===

Please pass this on to the Hindu organizations. Thanks. – Skanda987

 

Tulsidas ji described demolition of original Ram Mandir in 1528

From: vishwamohan tiwari < >
Date: Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 4:55 PM
Subject: Fwd: {भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्} Re: Tulsi Dasji described demolition of original Ram Mandir in 1528.

मित्रो,
यह प्रश्न अक्सर  किया जाता था क़ि तुलसी ने राममंदिर विध्वंस पर क्यों नाहीं कुछ  लिखा..
प्रमाण प्रस्तुत है..
विश्व मोहन तिवारी

 

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: subodh kumar < >
Date: Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: {भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्} Re: Tulsi Dasji described demolition of original Ram Mandir in 1528.

Allahabad High court judgment http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/DisplayAyodhyaBenchLandingPage.do  quoted from page 783.

तुलसी  दोहा शतक  से राम  जन्म मंदिर  के विध्वंस  पर :

मंत्र उपनिषद ब्राह्मनहुँ  बहु पुरान इतिहास ।

जवन  जराये  रोष  भरि  करि  तुलसी  परिहास ॥

 

सिखा सूत्र  से  हीन करि, बल ते हिन्दु लोग ।

भमरि  भगाये देश ते, तुलसी कठिन कुजोग ॥

 

बाबर  बर्बर  आइके, कर  लीन्हे करवाल ।

हने  पचारि पचारि जन, तुलसी काल कराल ॥

 

सम्बत सर वसु बान भर नभ, ग्रीष्म ऋतु अनुमानि ।

तुलसि अवधहिँ जड़ जवन, अनरथ किए अनखानि॥

 

राम  जनम मंदिर   महिँ मंदिरहिँ ,तोरि  मसीत  बनाय ।

जबहि  बहु  हिन्दुन हते ,   तुलसी कीन्ही हाय ॥

 

दल्यो  मीरबाकी अवध , मन्दिर राम समाज ।

तुलसी  रोवत हृदय अति , त्राहि त्राहि रघुराज ॥

 

राम  जनम मंदिर जहँ , लसत अवध के बीच ।

तुलसी रची मसीत तहँ, मीरबाकी खल नीच ॥

 

रामायन घरि घन्ट जहँ श्रुति पुरान उपखान।

तुलसी जवन अजान तहँ, कुरान  अजान ॥

 

New thoughts for Pakistan (the Muslims)

From: A Vedic < >

Pakistan New Thoughts
Should India trust Islamic Pakistan?
Should Pakistan first become a secular state before trusting?

Dawn (Pakistan) reporter, Mobarak Haider , renowned Pakistani Intellectual

Coexistence with India

[The final lines in this article are these. (The words added by Skanda987 are in parenthesis):

 

There is no country in the world even today where Islamist country gives equal rights to non-Muslims, and naturally there is growing (Muslim) concern for their future in India among (the Hindu) majority.    The problem is Islam itself.   Christianity grew out of their backward looking thinking in their own practice of religion (but it uses political and economic power to conver teh world,) but Islam followers are unable to grow out of archaic thinking of hatred and conquest that shaped the birth of its religion. (This is because Koran, Mohammed, and Hadith teaches them so.)    Unless and until we (the Muslims) grow to be all humanity as one religion, we feel oneness with the whole universe, as professed by Hinduism in its core, there is no future for this planet.  (This is only possible when the Muslims of India, pakistan, and Bangla Desh give up Islam. Why give up, because Islam is anti-Vedic, and has invaded in India by force, and the ancestors of all these Muslims a few centuries ago were Hindus who were forced to become Muslims, and teh history shows that where there is Islam, there cannto be peace.) As the world renowned Spiritual teacher Eckhart Tolle says, “Consciousness will find other avenues to express itself if humanity (specifically Islam) does not evolve.”]

 

Mobarak Haider | 5th February, 2013

 

-Illustration by Khuda Bux Abro.

This blog is part 1 of a four-part series that attempts to understand the enemy within; and why and how our establishment has fed this monster for decades.

See Part 2: Coexistence with the world

See Part 3: Coexistence with India – II

_____________________

Pakistan’s new army doctrine comes as good news for all who wish us well as a nation. For the first time in 65 years the army has shifted its focus from the eastern border to our internal enemy in the northwest. Let us hope it does not mean hands free for a crackdown on the Baloch, an issue that needs a political solution while harder military measures may result in deeper tragedies. Although, the army spokesman assured our lions and eagles that we shall keep India as our enemy no.1, yet the admission that the enemy within is more dangerous at the moment, may well prove to be a turning point in our history.

But we have to realize that the enemy within is not simply the non-state actors who have declared holy war on Pakistan; it is a special mindset that has created them and will continue to breed them in the future. It is this mindset which was discussed in detail in my book Tahzeebi Nargasiat and in subsequent writings, including my last blog. Facts and events of our history have shown that this mindset of pathological narcissism, of self-righteous self-love breeds a hundred tragedies till the society falls into paranoia and starts hurting itself and everything around it. What our army and government have now decided to fight is a threat not only to Pakistan but to the entire region’s peace. We have to combat that mindset and the forces that promote it, if we wish to survive as a state and society, whatever the amount of effort it may need, however painful the sacrifices it may demand. We cannot afford to fail, because such failure can empower nations of the region to intervene, exposing our land of anarchy to immense bloodshed and misery.

Unfortunately, the enemy within is the product of our obscure ambitions since 1947. It is of critical importance for us to understand why and how our establishment fed this monster for decades. We, the people, must know the truth if we wish to survive and grow.

The dominant classes of Pakistan that demanded separation from the rest of India in 1947 were mainly the same who had ruled India under different Muslim dynasties. They were the landed aristocracy, “pirs” and ulema of different levels. They lost power to the British, but never gave up their claim over India. Some Muslims who served the British as civil servants and the army men also joined to share the ambition for power. Being small in number these groups, even with the support of the entire Muslim population of India could not hope to dominate a huge Indian population in a democratic system. Therefore, they aroused the Muslim masses to support their demand for a separate homeland, appealing to their religious pride and fear of persecution. Congress leaders and a large number of Muslims who chose to live as Indian citizens all exerted each nerve to show our Muslim league leadership that a religious approach to politics in a world of diverse religions and people will initiate disaster but the highly aroused fears of persecution decided our course; our self-image as a special community prevailed.

Faith is one thing while a profession of faith is quite another. Like all ruling elite of medieval ages, our Muslim rulers of India were down-to-earth, worldly men; but they professed Islam only to win the devout support of religious leadership. Religious leaders have also been equally great self-seekers. These two groups of dominant professionals colluded throughout history to rule simpler people with the tool of faith, not only in the Muslim kingdoms of India but everywhere else too. They were magicians and pharaohs in Egypt, Khashtris (kshatriyas) and Brahmins in India, kings and priests in Christian Europe and Caliph Kings and ulema of fiqh in the Arab Empire. This pattern of power-sharing by the Muslim kings and ulema worked well in India. Shah Waliullah invited Abdali in that same capacity of a down-to-earth, power sharing priest. This same formula created the present day kingdom of Saud where a tribal chief and a holy man struck a deal. Almost a similar deal created Pakistan where Quaid-e-Azam seems to have been just a brilliant lawyer whose job ended soon after the partition.

Independence comes as jubilation to a nation. But in 1947 it came with tragedies of separation and bloodshed to the subcontinent. India overcame many of her problems because its leaders depended not on a religious class but on democracy, where the army accepted its subordinate and supporting role, while politics and diplomacy made the main defense. In Pakistan, medieval concepts dominated instead. We had been perpetually indoctrinated to love the “mujahid” and the maulana. The ulema and religious parties immediately demanded a decisive role. Landed gentry found the ulema and the army as their best protectors. That perhaps explains why no land reform has damaged them to this day.

These two stake holders decided to promote each other as the champions of Islam, fighting the heretics of India as their core duty. The Kashmir problem existed only as a permanent excuse for arousing sentiment; it was never handled with the modern tools of effective diplomacy because a liberal, democratic India always found more friends against our ever deepened religious identity. Only one education was allowed and available to the nation: Fight India with the power of Islam. This brought absolute power to our GHQ and finally served American plans; the soldiers of Islam faithfully fought for America’s global supremacy, opening Pakistan’s doors to international holy warriors.

An army that assumes political power cannot remain a professional fighting force; our army gradually outsourced its fighting jobs in Kashmir and Afghanistan to civilian opportunists who were made dearer to us than our own kith and kin through Islamic sentiment. General Zia encouraged these violent hordes to make money through crime and drugs. That might have exposed them to international buyers with greater rewards than Pakistan could offer. Ambition to rule Pak-Afghania may have motivated them and, unfortunately, these non-state actors are not just a few rebels out there; they have a vast popular backing among our affluent middle classes.

With absolute lack of vision, our political and military leadership created a mindset which has no respect for systems of a modern state. The only authority that appeals to this mindset is the maulana and themujahid. A very heartbreaking struggle awaits our lines of defense

All medieval conquerors were basically predators; they lived at the cost of the people they conquered, appropriating their resources, which naturally antagonized the subject people.  Muslim rulers, after the first four caliphs, used the Islamic doctrine of Zimmitude generally to their worldly benefit.

Rulers can win their subjects’ respect, even their affection, with their wisdom and justice. After many atrocities and crimes against their Indian subjects the British were able to leave India as almost friends, and no hostility exists today between them and their former subjects because their leaders and people confessed their crimes; they agreed to leave; and they left many gifts of value like modern learning, religious tolerance, systems of governance, constitutional democracy, science and technology.

Unfortunately, unlike the colonial capitalists of Europe, our ancestors had very few benefits to offer to their Zimmis in India which could endear them to their subjects. Added to it was the religious pride of our ulema that believed in the supremacy of Islam and flaunted it without a semblance of courtesy or hesitation. This only antagonized the subject people ever more deeply and necessitated perpetual use of force to maintain Muslim rule. In order to nourish the fighting spirit of the soldiers and common Muslims, ever more pride of faith and ever deeper contempt for reason was injected into their psyche through the ulema and clergy. The principle of equal human treatment of the Muslims and non-Muslims remained alien to their rule.

The absence of positive performance was compensated with boastful pride of the ability to destroy. That is perhaps an inherited attitude when our orators in Pakistan proudly talk of what we destroyed: our ancestors destroyed Indian idols and kings followed by the recent smashing of the peaceful Buddha; recently we destroyed the Soviet Union, we have pushed America to disaster, we shall destroy India, Europe and every system of “Jahiliah”, including our own systems and people in Pakistan and Afghanistan. This mindset hardly ever asks: what did we create or build?

We, as a nation, have gradually lost all respect for science and scientists; we have substituted research with conspiracy theories; we boast of our nuclear build-up, which is again an ability to destroy, not defend, an ability stolen from heretics without learning the science that creates it. This shortcut mentality, to escape science and invention, is an expression of our lazy, self-righteous pretensions. To bury the guilt, our power hungry ulema expects us to admire a scientist, a nuclear opportunist who admires the Taliban, and hate the real scientists of the world as heretics.

It is, therefore, natural for our people with this mindset to support the monster when it destroys Pakistan and the world with the banner of Islam in its hand. Self-righteousness is the dismissal of humility; it jams our ability to objectively appreciate merit, so that the virtue and merit of others never attracts our attention. Bragging of our own virtue and merit grows louder as our record of performance dips. This dichotomy of practice and pretension paralyses judgment and kills the resolve to make amends.

Ever since Independence, our governments and army leaders propagated the easy excuse that India aspires to annex Pakistan to realize an ancient Hindu dream of “Greater India”. But was this view realistic? Is it an exclusively Hindu dream? The fact is: Muslim rulers and the ulema also desired Greater India. They had endeavored hard for centuries to rule the whole of India; many times in these seven centuries they tried to hold Afghanistan with one hand while holding Bengal with the other. Ever since 1947, our generals and leaders have tried to grab Afghanistan and hold Bengal by force. Our lions and eagles still dream to destroy Bharat and make it a Muslim colony again.

Thus, it was natural for the ancient people of the subcontinent to dream of a united India even if it was no more possible. Long before the Muslim conquerors, India had Ashoka, Kanishka and Harshwardhana who ruled large parts of India with no less glory than the Muslims did. It was hardly anything abnormal if some nostalgic sons of the soil wished to restore their past glory in their own land, while the majority did not share the dream. Hindus have lived in this land for more than 4000 years with a deep sense of belonging. On the contrary, our Muslim ancestors came 1000 years ago and did not develop a sense of belonging. They did not assimilate or integrate with the people they ruled, keeping their identity as foreigners, with loyalty to the holy lands of Arabia. The British also ruled as foreigners but they did not demand a part of India like we did; they agreed to leave India while we did not, although we declared that we were not Indians. Our self-righteousness so limits our sense of justice that what we practice with great pomp and show, seems hateful to us if others desire it.

Justice and honesty demand that facts be examined before we accept or reject a claim. The facts did not verify the claim that India aspired to annex Pakistan or a part of it. Although a limited right wing of Indian politics threatened to avenge the wrongs of history, yet that mood never dominated India. On the contrary our opinion makers and the ulema on this side of the border kept pushing up on mass level the hype to conquer Kashmir and hoist our flag over the “Red Fort”.

It is difficult in Pakistan to state the fact that India did not annex Bhutan, Nepal, Sri Lanka or another dependent country. It did not annex Bangladesh which achieved its separation from Pakistan purely with Indian Army action. The wars which we claimed as Indian aggression on our eastern border were later exposed as our own initiation. These are facts that embarrass our claims of persecution.

To be continued…

 

Coexistence with the world

Mobarak Haider | 12th February, 2013

 

 

 

This blog is part 2 of a four-part series that attempts to understand the enemy within; and why and how our establishment has fed this monster for decades. 

See Part 1: Coexistence with India

See Part 3: Coexistence with India – II

_____________________

Unfortunately it is not yet clear whether our army and leaders really believe that “the enemy within” actually means those who use Islam for their power and support in their mission to destroy this state and society. So far neither the state nor the society seems to realize that these forces will destroy both of them as they exist today. In fact, the killer is a darling, a hero, a holy destroyer because he is fighting to implement in practice what the state and society profess as their ideal but do not implement.

While the state and society pretend to love Arabian Mullah’s Islam as a theory, they lack the readiness to live it. This society was told for generations that the state and all its resources must serve only Islam and fight the enemies of Islam. The “westernized” men in power believed this slogan would serve them well, without demanding any change in their Officer’s Mess culture. But political Ulema like Maudoodi, Mufti and Usmani were not their slaves; they had great ambitions with the Holy Arab Empire behind them. As generals and bureaucrats plunged in their prosperity drive and property deals, organized Islam steadily entered lower ranks in all centers of power and lashed at the semi liberal patterns of society, calling it depravity, perversion and shameless rebellion against Allah.


Dichotomy of conviction and conduct creates a crushing sense of guilt. The entire society and its rulers stood like truant boys before the godly maulana. Pakistan’s teeming millions of working masses had no sense of guilt, but Bhutto, their dearly loved leader, found his own iron melting and went to Maudoodi’s den to seek forgiveness. His later decision to lay down his life, however, brought him back to the simple-hearted masses, perhaps because they love simple and liberal Islam and do not feel the guilt of dichotomy which so molests our affluent middle class.

Everybody of importance soon realized that externalization of guilt in public and repentance in private were good ways to wash dirty hands, while keeping what they had grabbed. The emergence of Zia was natural while that of Musharraf was so unnatural that an armed invasion of the Islamic Republic became possible to cleanse it of un-Islamic “filth”. When holy warriors today attack our troops or explode our people, resentment is not directed towards the warrior, it simply turns to the “hypocrite” in power. The holy warrior’s destructiveness, therefore, is not so hateful as to deserve the treatment that India or America deserves. This perhaps explains why the “enemy within” is so single-minded and so organized while our leaders, generals and middle classes vacillate like overgrown stalks in wind.

Our first Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan panicked when he received an invitation from the Soviets and requested the Americans to save him by sending an invitation. Thus, we assumed our interesting role that spelled gradual disaster: Islam for America to fight the Soviets + Islam for our army to fight India. Much later when the East wing was gone and the two nation theory almost done, Z A Bhutto added another enemy to the list of our eternal enemies. Now we had Hindus and Jews in addition to atheists, a thousand years to fight for a thousand miles on the East and a thousand miles across the Holy Lands. We injected our nation’s blood in the nukes till the intoxicated nation lost its consciousness due to anemia. How rewarding was it to have the Islamic bomb? We lost Bhutto as a punishment from our Western mentor who knew our nuclear prowess was meaningless against the Soviets while dangerous in the hands of an emotionally charged religious state against India and Israel. We fought India each time to lose, because the US did not support us but we won against the Soviets because the Free World stood behind. We consistently refused to see that not only America but the whole world valued India and Israel. Only China supported us for a while against India till we showed her our holy teeth in Sinkiang, and Saudi Arabia encouraged us against Israel only by occasionally permitting us to kiss the holy royal hands.

The enemy within is a breed of crude, unreasoning tyrants who have no respect for life and law, not even their own. The mindset which created this self-righteous specie is strongly negative. It negates and excludes all that is “the others”, so that what remains to be admired is “we” and “ours”. Everything we do is right and just. Unfortunately, for more than a millennium, we, the Muslims of the world, served our ruling elite as their power base, as their soldiers, their police and agricultural work force. Perpetual conflict with the subject people, excessive emphasis on faith and dominance of the dogmatic Ulema dried up the positive human creativity of Muslims, as well as their subjects.

The Holy Prophet of Islam (SAAW) desired to know the essence of things, but Muslim societies for ever produced only Imam, Hafiz and Mujahid. The tradition of reason and critical thinking grew for just a century but dried up as an illegal activity after Imam Hambal, to be finally strangulated by Imam Ghazali. Freedom to think and disagree was strongly crushed with the final defeat of Mu’tazilla. Since creativity needs freedom to think and disagree, therefore, the Muslim civilization lost all creativity. Although the pride of righteousness and spirituality was pumped into the Muslim psyche, our world remained deeply soaked in myopic selfishness and parrot learning. Trade excelled in the Arab empire more than it had in any earlier periods of history, but innovation and improvement in other fields became alien to the Muslim Ummah; agriculture, handicrafts, transport, navigation, political system, health, education and administration stagnated for centuries because the conquerors and traders don’t need innovation. Even weaponry which was the source of our power remained pathetically conventional till the Mongols came to show us that we were not the fastest horsemen or the most efficient killers.

Our leaders and generals must see these facts of history and life. We have to open a national seminar that aims at reforming our middle class concepts of guilt and virtue and competence. Disastrous ambitions of political Islam to rule this region and the world must be exposed as merit-less and suicidal. Islam must be redeemed as a soft and kind path to ethical goodness and humility. Its role must end as a weapon in the hands of an aggressively pretentious but totally uncreative mullah. But that will start only when our leaders realize the threat and discard their strategic assets. It is disturbing to hear that ambitions of strategic depth and parasitic blackmail persist; no redemption is possible if that is true.

To be continued…

 

 

The author is a renowned Pakistani intellectual. His Urdu books Tehzeebi Nargisyat and Mubaalghe, Mughaalte are widely regarded as the revival of critical thinking and free inquiry in Urdu non-fiction.

 

 

 

 

Thank you for your honest and frank article.   I pray that no harm comes to you from wrongheaded extremists in your country where speaking ones mind is crime.   What happened after Independence in Pakistan and Bangla Desh also need introspection.   In 1947, Pakistan had 25% Hindus and Sikhs, today less than 1% and in Bangla Desh 30% and today less than 10%.   I understand most of this happened within few months after partition and later by conversions, forcible marriages by kidnapping girls, this is the life of minorities in Pakistan.   In spite of perceived shortcomings for minorities in India, Muslim population increased from 7% to 15+% and added to illegal immigration; it is now believed to be 20%.    There is no country in the world even today where Islamist country gives equal rights to non-Muslims, and naturally there is growing concern for their future in India among (the Hindu) majority.    The problem is Islam itself.   Christianity grew out of their backward looking thinking in their own practice of religion, but Islam followers are unable to grow out of archaic thinking of hatred and conquest that shaped the birth of its religion.    Unless and until we grow to be all humanity as one religion, we feel oneness with the whole universe, as professed by Hinduism in its core, there is no future for this planet.  As the world renowned Spiritual teacher Eckhart Tolle says, “consciousness will find other avenues to express itself if humanity does not evolve.”

 

 

Genocide by Pakistan

From: Dilip Kumar Roy < >

 

Neville Anthony Mascarenhas, a Pakistani journalist and author, wrote an article called “Genocide”, which was published in The Sunday Times on 13 June 1971. It is credited with having “exposed for the first time the scale of the Pakistan army’s brutal campaign to suppress its breakaway eastern province”.

 

Many think Macarena’s reportage played its part in ending the war. It helped turn world opinion against Pakistan and encouraged India to play a decisive role. Even Indian then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi herself stating that Mascarenhas’ article has led her” to prepare the ground for India’s armed intervention.” In 1972, he won the Granada’s Gerald Barry Award and the International Publishing Company’s Special Award for reporting on the human rights violations committed during the Bangladesh Liberation War.

Here Is the Full Articles collected from Bangladesh Documents vol – I, page no: 358 – 373.

GENOCIDE
An account by Anthony Mascarenhas

Former Assistant Editor, Morning News, Karachi

(Note – Skanda987 has corrected punctuations and has run spell check. Still the article may not be as original.)

            ABDUL BARI had run out of luck. Like thousands of other people in East Bengal, he had made the mistake – the fatal mistake – of running within sight of a Pakistani army patrol. He was 24 years old, a slight man surrounded by soldiers. He was trembling, because he was about to be shot.

 

“Normally we would have killed him as he ran,” I was informed chattily by Major Rathore, the G-2 Ops. of the 9th Division, as we stood on the out­skirts of a tiny village near Mudafarganj, about 20 miles south of Comilla.

 

“But we are checking him out for your sake. You are new here and I see you have a squeamish stomach. ”
“Why kill him?” I asked with mounting concern.
“Because he might be a Hindu or he might be a rebel, perhaps a student or an Awami Leaguer.

 

“They know we are sorting them out and they betray themselves by running. ”

“But why are you killing them? And why pick on the Hindus?” I persisted.

“Must I remind you, ” Rathore said severely, ”how they have tried to des­troy Pakistan? Now

under the cover of the fighting we have an excellent oppor­tunity of finishing them off. ”
First Glimpse of Blood stains
“Of course, ” he added hastily, ”we are only killing the Hindu men. We are soldiers, not cowards like the rebels. They kill our women and children. ”
I WAS GETTING my first glimpse of the stain of blood which has spread over the otherwise verdant land of East Bengal. First it was the massacre of the non-Bengalis in a savage outburst of Bengali hatred. Now it was massacre, deliberately carried out by the West Pakistan army.
The pogrom’s victims are not only the Hindus of East Bengal-who constitute about 10 per cent of the 75 million population, but also many thousands of Bengali Muslims. These include university and college students, teachers, Awami League and Left-Wing political cadres and every one thee army can catch of the 176, 000 Bengali military men and police who mutinied on March 26 in a specta­cular, though untimely and ill-starred bid, to create an independent Republic of Bangla Desh.
What I saw and heard with unbelieving eyes and ears during my 10 days in East Bengal in late April made it terribly clear that the killings are not the isolated acts of military commanders in the field.
The West Pakistani soldiers are not the only ones who have been killing in East Bengal, of course. On the night of March 25-and this I was allowed to report by the Pakistani censor-the Bengali troops and paramilitary units stationed in East Pakistan mutinied and attacked non-Bengalis with atrocious savagery.
Thousands of families of unfortunate Muslims, many of them refugees from Bihar who chose Pakistan at the time of the partition riots in 1947 were merci­lessly wiped out. Women were raped, or had their breasts torn out with specially fashioned knives. Children did not escape the horror: the lucky ones were killed with their parents; but many thousands of others must go through what life remains for them with eyes gouged out and limbs roughly amputated. More than 20, 000 bodies of non-Bengalis have been found in the main towns, such as Chitta­gong, Khulna and Jessore. The real toll, I was told everywhere in East Bengal, may have been as high as 100, 000; for thousands of non-Bengalis have vanished with­out a trace.
The Government of Pakistan has let the world know about that first horror. What it has suppressed is the second and worse horror which followed when its own army took over the killing. West Pakistani officials privately calculate that; altogether both sides have killed 250, 000 people-not counting those who have died of famine and disease.
Reacting to the almost successful breakaway of the province, which has more than half the country’s population, General Yahya Khan’s military Govern­ment is pushing through its own” final solution” of the East Bengal problem.
“We are determined to cleanse East Pakistan once and for all of the threat of secession, even if it means killing of two million people and ruling the pro­vince as a colony for 30 years, ” I was repeatedly told by senior military and civil officers in Dacca and Comilla.
The West Pakistan army in East Bengal is doing exactly that with a terri­fying thoroughness.
WE HAD BEEN racing against the setting sun after a visit to Chandpur (the West Pakistan army prudently stays indoors at night in East Bengal) when one of the jawans (privates) crouched in the back of the Toyota Land Cruiser called out sharply:”There’s a man running, Sahib”.
Major Rathore brought the vehicle to an abrupt halt, simultaneously reaching for the Chinese made light machine-gun propped against the door. Less than 200 yards away a man could be seen loping through the knee-high paddy.
“For God’s sake don’t shoot,” I cried. ”He’s unarmed. He’s only a villager. ” Rathore gave me a dirty look and fired a warning burst.
As the man sank to a crouch in the lush carpet of green, two jawarns were already on their way to drag him in. The thud of a rifle butt across the shoulders preceded the questioning.
“Who are you?”
“Mercy, Sahib! My name is Abdul Bari. I’m a tailor from the New Market in Dacca.
“Don’t lie to me. You’re a Hindu. Why were you running?”
“’It’s almost curfew time, Sahib, and I was going to my village.”
“Tell me the truth. Why were you running?”
Before the man could answer he was quickly frisked for weapons by a jawan while another quickly snatched away his lunghi. The skinny body that was bared revealed the distinctive traces of circumcision, which is obligatory for Muslims.
The truckloads of human targets
At least it could be plainly seen that Bari was not a Hindu. The interrogation proceeded.
“Tell me, why were you running?”
By this time Bari, wild eyed and trembling violently, could not answer. He buckled at the knees.
“He looks like a fauji, sir,” volunteered one jawan as Bari was hauled to his feet, (Fauji is the Urdu word for soldier: the army uses it for the Bengali rebels it is hounding. )
“Could be,” I heard Rathore mutter grimly.
Abdul Bari was clouted several times with the butt end of a rifle, then ominously pushed against a wall. Mercifully his screams brought a young head peeping from the shadows of a nearby hut. Bari shouted something in Bengali. The head vanished. Moments later a bearded old man came haltingly from the hut. Rathore pounced on him.
“Do you know this man?”
“Yes, Sahib. He is Abdul Bari.”

“Is he a fauji?”
“No Sahib, he is a tailor from Dacca. ”
“Tell me the truth. ”
“Khuda Kassam (God’s oath), Sahib, he is a tailor. ”
There was a sudden silence. Rathore looked abashed as I told him “For God’s sake let him go. What more proof do you want of his innocence?”
But the jawans were apparently unconvinced and kept milling around Bari. It was only after I had once more interceded on his behalf that Rathore ordered Bari to be released. By that time he was a crumpled, speechless heap of terror. But his life had been saved. Others have not been as fortunate.
For six days as I travelled with the officers of the 9th Division headquarters at Comilla I witnessed at close quarters the extent of the killing. I saw Hindus, hunted from village to village and door to door, shot off-hand after a cursory” short-arm inspection” showed they were uncircumcised. I have heard the screams of men bludgeoned to death in the compound of the Circuit House (civil administrative headquarters) in Comilla. I have seen truck loads of other human targets and those who had the humanity to try to help them hauled off “for under the cover of darkness and curfew.” I have witnessed the brutality of “kill and burn missions” as the army units, after clearing out the rebels, pursued the pogrom in the towns and the villages.
I have seen whole villages devastated by “punitive action.”
And in the officers’ mess at night I have listened incredulously as otherwise brave and honorable men proudly chewed over the day’s kill.
“How many did you get?”
The answers are seared in my memory.
All this is being done, as any West Pakistani officer will tell you, for the “preservation of the unity, the integrity and the ideology of Pakistan. ” It is, of course, too late for that. The very military action that is designed to hold together the two wings of the country, separated by a thousand miles of India, has confirmed the ideological and emotional break. East Bengal can only be kept in Pakistan by the heavy hand of the army. And the army is dominated by the Punjabis, who traditionally despise and dislike the Bengalis.
The break is so complete today that few Bengalis will willingly be seen in the company of a West Pakistani. I had a distressing experience of this kind during my visit to Dacca when I went to visit an old friend. “I’m sorry, ” he told me as he turned away, ”things have changed. The Pakistan that you and I knew has ceased to exist. Let us put it behind us. ”
Hours later a Punjabi army officer, talking about the massacre of the non­ Bengalis before the army moved in, told me:” They have treated us more brutally than the Sikhs did in the partition riots in 1947. How can we ever forgive or forget this?”
Annihilation of Hindus
The bone-crushing military operation has two distinctive features. One is what the authorities like to call the “cleansing process”; a euphemism for massacre. The other is the “rehabilitation effort.

” This is a way of describing the moves to turn East Bengal into a docile colony of West Pakistan. These commonly used expressions and the repeated official references to “miscreants” and “infiltra­tors” are part of the charade which is being enacted for the benefit of the world. Strip away the propaganda, and the reality is colonization-and killing.
The justification for the annihilation of the Hindus was paraphrased by Lt. Gen. Tikka Khan, the Military Governor of East Pakistan, in a radio broadcast I heard on April 18. He said:”The Muslims of East Pakistan, who had played a leading part in the creation of Pakistan, are determined to keep it alive. How­ever, the voice of the vast majority had been suppressed through coercion, threats to life and property by a vocal, violent and aggressive minority, which forced the Awami League to adopt the destructive course. ”
Others, speaking privately, were blunter in seeking justification.
“The Hindus had completely undermined the Muslim masses with their money, ” Col. Naim, of 9th Division headquarters, told me in the officers’ mess at Comilla. They bled the province white. Money, food and produce flowed across the bor­ders to India. In some cases they made up more than half the teaching staff in the colleges and schools, and sent their own children to be educated in Cal­cutta. It had reached the point where Bengali culture was in fact Hindu culture, and East Pakistan was virtually under the control of the Marwari businessmen in Calcutta. We have to sort them out to restore the land to the people, and the people to their Faith. ”
Or take Major Bashir. He came up from the ranks. He is SSO of the 9th Division at Comilla and he boasts of a personal body count of 28. He had his own reasons for what has happened. ”This is a war between the pure and the impure,” he informed me over a cup of green tea. ”The people here may have Muslim names and call themselves Muslims. But they are Hindus at heart. You won’t believe that the maulvi (mulla) of the Cantonment mosque here issued a fathwa (edict) during Friday prayers that the people would attain janat (paradise) if they killed West Pakistanis. We sorted the bastard out and we are now sor­ting out the others. Those who are left will be real Muslims. We will even teach them Urdu. ”
Everywhere I found officers and men fashioning imaginative garments of justification from the fabric of their own prejudices. Scapegoats had to be found to legitimize, even for their own consciences, the dreadful “solution” to what in essence was a political problem: the Bengalis won the election and wanted to rule. The Punjabis, whose ambitions and interests have dominated government policies since the founding of Pakistan in 1947, would brook no erosion of their power. The army backed them up.
Officials privately justify what has been done as retaliation for the massacre of the non-Bengalis before the army moved in. But events suggest that the pog­rom was not the result of a spontaneous or undisciplined reaction. It was planned.
General Tikka Khan takes over
It seems clear that the “sorting-out” began to be planned about the time that Lt-Gen. Tikka Khan took over the governorship of East Bengal, from the gentle, self-effacing Admiral Ahsan, and the military command there, from the scholarly Lt-Gen. Sahibzada Khan. That was at the beginning of March, when Sheikh Mujibur Rahman’s civil disobedience movement was gathering momentum after the postponement of the assembly meeting from which the Bengalis hoped for so much. President Yahya Khan, it is said, acquiesced in the tide of resent­ment caused in the top echelons of the military establishment by the increasing humiliation of the West Pakistani troops stationed in East Bengal. The Punjabi Eastern Command at Dacca continues to dominate the policies of the Central Government. [It is perhaps worth pointing out that the Khans are not related: Khan is a common surname in Pakistan.
When the army units fanned out in Dacca on the evening of March 25, in pre-emptive strikes against the mutiny planned for the small hours of the next morning, many of them carried lists of people to be liquidated. These included the Hindus and large numbers of Muslims; students, Awami Leaguers, professors, journalists and those who had been prominent in Sheikh Mujib’s movement. The charge, now publicly made, that the army was subjected to mortar attack from the Jaganath Hall, where the Hindu university students lived, hardly justifies the obliteration of two Hindu colonies, built around the temples on Raman race course, and a third in Shakrepati, in the heart of the old city. Nor does it explain why the sizeable Hindu populations of Dacca and the neighboring industrial town of Narayanganj should have vanished so completely during the round-the-clock curfew on March 26 and 27. There is similarly no trace of scores of Muslims who were rounded up during the curfew hours. These people were eliminated in a planned operation: and improvised response to Hindu aggression would have had ~as, l~ different results.
Touring Dacca on April 15 1 found the heads of four students lying rotting on the roof of the Iqbal Hall hostel. The caretaker said they had been killed on the night of March 25. I also found heavy traces of blood on the two staircases and in four of the rooms. Behind Iqbal Hall a large residential building seemed to have been singled out for special attention by the army. The walls were pitted with bullet holes and a foul smell still lingered on the staircase, although it had been heavily powdered with DDT. Neighbors said the bodies of 23 women and children had been carted away only hours before. They had been decomposing on the roof since March 25. It was only after much question­ing that I was able to ascertain that the victims belonged to the nearby Hindu shanties. They had sought shelter in the building as the army closed in.
THIS IS GENOCIDE conducted with amazing casualness. Sitting in the office of Major Agha, Martial Law Administrator of Comilla city, on the morning of’ April 19, I saw the off-hand manner in which sentences were meted out. A Bihari sub-inspector of police had walked in with a list of prisoners being held in the police lock-up. Agha looked it over. Then, with a flick of his pencil, he casually ticked off four names on the list.
“Bring these four to me this evening for disposal,” he said. He looked at the list again. The pencil flicked once more.”. . . and bring this thief along with, them. ”
Death sentence over Cold Drink
The death sentence had been pronounced over a glass of coconut milk. I was informed that two of the prisoners were Hindus, the third a “student,” and the fourth an Awami League organizer. The “thief,” it transpired, was a lad named Sebastian who had been caught moving the household effects of a Hindu friend to his own house.
Later that evening I saw these men, their hands and legs tied loosely with, a single rope, being led down the road to the Circuit House compound. A little after curfew, which was at 6 o’clock, a flock of squawking mynah birds were disturbed in their play by the thwacking sound of wooden clubs meeting bone and flesh.
Captain Azmat of the Baluch Regiment had two claims to fame according to the mess banter. One was his job as ADC to Maj. -Gen. Shaukat Raza, Commanding officer of the 9th Division. The other was thrust on him by his colleagues’ ragging.
Azmat, it transpired, was the only officer in the group who had not made a” kill” Major Bashir needled him mercilessly.
“Come on Azmat,” Bashir told him one night, “we are going to make a man of you. Tomorrow we will see how you can make them run. It’s so easy.”
To underscore the point Bashir went into one of his long spiels. Apart from his duties as SSO, Bashir was also “education officer” at Headquarters. He was the only Punjabi officer I found who could speak Bengali fluently. By general agreement Bashir was also a self-taught bore who gloried in the sound of his own voice.
A dare Walla (bearded man) we were told, had come to see Bashir that morning to inquire about his brother, a prominent Awami League organizer of Camilla who had been netted by the army some days earlier. Dhor gaya, Bashir said he told him:”He has run away. ” The old man couldn’t comprehend how his brother could have escaped on a broken leg. Neither could I. So Major Bashir, with a broad wink, enlightened me. The record would show dhor gaya: “shot while escaping. ”
I never did find out whether Captain Azmat got his kill. The rebel Bengali forces who had dug in at Feni, seventy miles north of Chittagong on the highway to Comilla had tied down the 9th Division by destroying all the bridges and culverts in the area. General Raza was getting hell from the Eastern Command at Dacca which was anxious to have the south-eastern border sealed against escaping rebels. It was also desperately urgent to open this only land route to the north to much= needed supplies that had been piling up in the port at Chittagong.
So General Raza was understandably waspish. He flew over the area almost -daily. He also spent hours haranguing the brigade that was bogged down at Feni. Captain Azmat, as usual, was the General’s shadow. I did not see him again. But if experience is any pointer, Azmat probably had to sweat out his “kill” and the ragging-for another three weeks. It was only on May 8 that the 9th Division was able to clear Feni and the surrounding area. By then the Bengali rebels, forced out by relentless bombing and artillery barrages, had escaped with their weapons across the neighboring border into India.
The escape of such large numbers of armed, hard-core regulars among the Bengali, rebels was a matter of grave concern to Lt. -Col. Aslam Baig, G-1 at 9th Division headquarters. ”The Indians,” he explained, will “obviously not allow them to settle there. It would be too dangerous. So they will be allowed in on sufferance as long as they keep making sorties across the border. Unless we can kill them off, we are going to have serious trouble for a long time. ”
Lt: Col. Baig was a popular artillery officer who had done a stint in China after the India-Pakistan war when units of the Pakistan Army were converting to Chinese equipment. He was said to be a proud family man. He also loved Cowers. He told me with unconcealed pride that during a previous posting at Comilla he had brought from China the giant scarlet water-lilies that adorn the pond opposite the headquarters. Major Bashir adored him. Extolling one officer’s decisiveness Bashir told me that once they had caught a rebel officer there was a big fuss about what should be done with him. ” While the others were telephoning all over for instructions,” she said, ” he solved the problem. Dhor gaya. Only the man’s foot was left sticking out -of the ditch. ”
It is hard to imagine so much brutality in the midst of so much beauty Comilla was blooming when I went there towards the end of April. The rich green, carpet of rice paddies spreading to the horizon on both sides of the road was broken here and there by bright splashes of red. That was the Gol Mohor, aptly dubbed the” Flame, of the Forest,” coming to full bloom. Mango and coconut trees in the villages dotting the countryside were heavy with fruit. Even the terrier-sized goats skipping across the road gave evidence of the abundance of nature in Bengal. ” The only , way you can tell the male from the female,” they told me, ” is that all the she-goats are pregnant. ”
Fire and Murder their vengeance
In one of the most crowded areas of the entire world-Comilla district has a population density of 1, 900 to the square mile-only man was nowhere to be seen.
“Where are the Bengalis?” I had asked my escorts in the strangely empty streets of Dacca a few days earlier. ” They have gone to the villages, – was the stock reply. Now, in the countryside, there were still no Bengalis. Comilla town, like Dacca, was heavily shuttered, and in ten miles on the road to Laksham. Past silent villages, the peasants I saw could have been counted on the fingers of both hands.
There were, of course, soldiers-hundreds of unsmiling men in khaki, each with an automatic rifle. According to orders, the rifles never left their hands. The roads are constantly patrolled by tough, trigger-happy men. Wherever the army is, you won’t­ find Bengalis.
Martial law orders, constantly repeated on the radio and in the Press, proclaim the­ death penalty for anyone caught in the act of sabotage. If a road is obstructed or a bridge damaged or destroyed, all houses within 10 yards of the spot are liable to be demolished and their inhabitants rounded up.
The practice is even more terrible than anything the words could suggest. ” Punitive­ action” is something that the Bengalis have come to dread.
We saw what this meant when we were approaching Hajiganj, which straddles the road to Chandpur, on the morning of April 17. A few miles before Hajiganj, a 15-foot bridge had been damaged the previous night by rebels who were still active in the area. According to Major Rathore (G-2 Ops. ) an army unit had immediately been sent out to take punitive action. Long spirals of smoke could be seen on all sides up to a distance of a quarter of a mile from the damaged bridge. And as we carefully drove over a bed of wooden boards, with which it had been hastily repaired, we could see houses in the village on the right beginning to catch fire.
At the back of the village some jawans were spreading the flames with dried coconut fronds. They make excellent kindling and are normally used for cooking. We could also see a body sprawled between the coconut trees at the entrance to the village. On other side of the road another village in the rice paddies showed evidence of the fire that had gutted more than a dozen bamboo and mat huts. Hundreds of villagers had escaped before the army came. Others, like the man among the coconut trees, were slow to get away.
As we drove on, Major Rathore said, “They brought it on themselves.” I said it was surely too terrible a vengeance on innocent people for the acts of a handful of rebels. He did not answer.
A few hours later when we were again passing through Hajiganj on the way back from Chandpur, I had my first exposure to the savagery of a” kill and burn mission”.
We were still caught up in the aftermath of a tropical storm which had hit the area that afternoon. A heavy overcast made ghostly shadows on the mosque towering: above the town. Light drizzle was beginning to wet the uniforms of Captain Azhar and the four jawans riding in the exposed escort jeep behind us.
We turned a corner and found a convoy of trucks parked outside the mosque. I counted seven, all filled with jawans in battle dress. At the head of the column was& a jeep. Across the road two men, supervised by a third, were trying to batter down the door of one of more than a hundred shuttered shops lining the road. The studded teak wood door was beginning to give under the combined assault of two axes as Major Rathore brought the Toyota to a halt.
“What the hell are you doing?”
The tallest of the trio, who was supervising the break-in, turned and peered at us. “Mota,” (Fatty) he shouted, “what the hell do you think we are doing?”
Recognizing the voice, Rathore drew a water-melon smile. It was, he informed me, his old friend “Ifty”-Major Iftikhar of the 12th Frontier Force Rifles.
Rathore:” I thought someone was looting. ”
Iftikhar: “Looting? No. We are on kill and burn.”
Waving his Land to take in the shops, he said he was going to destroy the ‘. ct.
Rathore: “How many did you get?”
Iftikhar smiled bashfully.
Rathore:” Come on. How many did you get?”
Iftikhar:” Only twelve. And by God we were lucky to get them. We would have lost those, too, if I hadn’t sent my men from the back. ”
Prodded by Major Rathore, Iftikhar then went on to describe vividly how after much searching in Hajiganj he had discovered twelve Hindus hiding in a house on the outskirts of the town. These had been” disposed of”. Now Major Iftikhar was on the second part of his mission: burn.
By this time the shop’s door had been demobilized and we found ourselves looking into one of those tiny catch-all establishments which, in these parts, go under the title “Medical & Stores.” Under the Bengali lettering the signboard carried in English the legend “Ashok Medical & Stores.” Lower down was painted “Prop. A. M. Bose.” Mr. Bose, like the rest of the people of Hajiganj, had locked and run away.
In front of the shop a small display cabinet was crammed with patent medicines, cough syrups, and some bottles of mango squash, imitation jewelry, reels of colored cotton, thread and packets of knickers elastic. Iftikhar kicked it over, smashing the light wood-work into kindling. Next he reached out for some jute shopping bags on one shelf. He took some plastic toys from another. A bundle of handkerchiefs and a small bolt of red cloth joined the pile on the floor. Iftikhar heaped them all together and borrowed a matchbox from one of the jawans sitting in our Toyota. The jawan had ideas of his own. Jumping from the vehicle he ran to the shop and tried to pull down one of the umbrellas hanging from the low ceiling of the shop. Iftikhar ordered him out.
Looting, he was sharply reminded, was against orders.
Iftikhar soon had a fire going. He threw burning jute bags into one corner of the shop, the bolt of cloth into another. The shop began to blaze. Within minutes we could hear the crackle of flames behind shuttered doors as the fire spread to the shop on the left, then on to the next one.
At this point Rathore was beginning to get anxious about the gathering darkness. So we drove on.
When I chanced to meet Major Iftikhar the next day he ruefully told me, “I burnt only sixty houses. If it hadn’t rained I would have got the whole bloody lot. ”
Approaching a village a few miles from Mudarfarganj we were forced to a halt by what appeared to be a man crouching against a mud wall. One of the jawans warned it might be a fauji sniper. But after careful scouting it turned out to be a lovely young Hindu girl. She sat there with the placidity of her people, waiting for God knows who. One of the jawans had been ten years with the East Pakistan Rifles and could speak bazaar Bengali. He was told to order her into the village. She mumbled some­thing in reply, but stayed where she was, but was ordered a second time. She was still sitting there as we drove away. ” She has, ” I was informed, ” nowhere to go-no family, no home. ”
Major Iftikhar was one of several officers assigned to kill and burn missions. They moved in after the rebels had been cleared by the army with the freedom to comb-out and destroy Hindus and” miscreants” (the official jargon for rebels) and to burn down everything in the areas from which the army had been fired at.
Three shots to kill a man
This lanky Punjabi officer liked to talk about his job. Riding with Iftikhar to the Circuit House in Comilla on another occasion he told me about his latest exploit.
“We got an old one.” he said. ” The bastard had grown a beard and was posing as a devout Muslim even called himself Abdul Manan. But we gave him a medical inspection and the game was up. ”
Iftikhar continued:” I wanted to finish him there and then, but my men told me such a bastard deserved three shots. So I gave him one in the balls, then one in the stomach. Then I finished him off with a shot in the head. ”
When I left Major Iftikhar he was headed north to Bramanbaria. His mission: Another kill and burn.
Overwhelmed with terror the Bengalis have one of two reactions. Those who can run away just seem to vanish. Whole towns have been abandoned as the army approached. Those who can’t run away adopt a cringing servility which only adds humiliation to their plight.
Chandpur was an example of the first.
In the past this key river port on the Meghna was noted for its thriving business houses and gay life. At night thousands of small country boats anchored on the river’s edge made it a fairy land of lights. On April 18 Chandpur was deserted. No people, no boats. Barely one per cent of the population had remained. The rest, particularly the Hindus who constituted nearly half the population, had fled.
Weirdly they had left behind thousands of Pakistani flags fluttering from every house, shop and rooftop. The effect was like a national day celebration without the crowds. It only served to emphasize the haunted look.
The flags were by way of insurance.
Somehow the word had got around that the army considered any structure with­out a Pakistani flag to be hostile and consequently to be destroyed. It did not matter how the Pakistani flags were made, so long as they were adorned with the crescent and star. So they came in all sizes, shapes and colors. Some flaunted blue fields, instead of the regulation green. Obviously they had been hastily put together with the same material that had been used for the blue Bangla Desh flag. Indeed blue Pakistani flags were more common than the green. The scene in Chandpur was repeated in Hajiganj, Madarfarganj, Kasba, Brahmanbaria; all ghost towns gay, with flags.
Laksham was an example of the other reaction; cringing.
When I drove into the town the morning after it had been cleared of the rebels, all I could see was the army and literally thousands of Pakistani flags. The major in charge there had camped in the police station, and it was there that Major Rathore took us. My colleague, a Pakistani TV cameraman, had to make a propa­ganda film about the “return to normalcy” in Laksham-one of the endless series broadcast daily showing welcome parades and “peace meetings.”
A ‘Parade’ and a Knowing Wink
I wondered how he could manage it but the Major said it would be no sweat. “There are enough of these bastards left to put on a good show. Give me 20 minute­s.”
Lieutenant Javed of the 39 Baluch was assigned the task of rounding up a crowd. He called out to an elderly bearded man who had apparently been brought in for questioning. The man, who later gave his name as Moulana Said Mohammad Saidul Huq, insisted he was a “staunch Muslim Leaguer and not from the Awami League” (The Muslim League led the movement for an independent Pakistan in. 1947. He was all too eager to please. “I will very definitely get you at least 60 men in 20 minutes,” he told Javed. “But if you give me two hours I will bring 200.”
Moulana Saidul Huq was as good as his word. We had hardly drunk our flit of the deliciously refreshing coconut milk that had been thought fully supplied by the Major when we heard shouts in the distance. “Pakistan Zindabad!” “Pakistan, army Zindabad!” “Muslim League Zindabad!” they were chanting. (Zindabad is Urdu for “Long live!”) Moments later they marched into view a motley crowd of about 50 old and decrepit men and knee-high children, all waving Pakistani flags and shouting at the top of their voices. Lt. Javed gave me a knowing wink.
Within minutes the parade had grown into a “public meeting” complete with a make-shift public address system and a rapidly multiplying group of would-be speakers.
Mr. Mahbub-ur-Rahman was pushed forward to make the address of welcome to the army. He introduced himself as “N. F. College Professor of English and Arabic who had also tried for History and is a life-time member of the great Muslim, League Party.”
Introduction over, Mahbub-ur-Rahman gave forth with gusto. “Punjabis and Bengalis,” he said, “had united for Pakistan and we had our own traditions and culture. But we were terrorized by the Hindus and the Awami Leaguers and led astra. . Now we thank God that the Punjabi soldiers have saved us. They are the best soldiers in the world and heroes of humanity. We love and respect them from the bottom of our hearts.” And so on, interminably, in the same vein.
After the “meeting” I asked the Major what he thought about the speech, “Serves the purposes,” he said, “but I don’t trust that bastard. I’ll put him on my list.”
The agony of East Bengal is not over. Perhaps the worst is yet to come. . The army is determined to go on until the “clean-up” is completed. So far the job is only half done. Two divisions of the Pakistan Army, the 9th and the 16th, were flown out from West Pakistan to “sort out” the Bengali rebels and the Hindus. This was a considerable logistical feat for a country of Pakistan’s resources. More than 25, 000 men were moved from the west to the east. On March 28 the two divisions were given 48 hours’ notice to move. They were brought by train to Karachi from Kharian and Multan. Carrying only light bed rolls and battle packs (their equipment was to follow by sea), the troops were flown out to Dacca by PIA, the national airline. Its fleet of seven Boeings was taken off international and domestic routes and. flew the long haul (via) Ceylon continuously for 14 days. A few Air Force transport aircraft helped.
The troops went into action immediately with equipment borrowed from the 14th Division which till then constituted the Eastern Command. The 9th Division, . operating from Comilla, was ordered to seal the border in the east against movement of rebels and their supplies. The 16th Division, with headquarters at Jessore, had a similar task in the western sector of the province. They completed these assignments by the third week of May. With the rebels-those who have not been able to escape to India-boxed in a ring of steel and fire, the two army divisions are beginning to converge in a relentless comb-out operation. Ibis will, undoubtedly mean that the terror experienced in the border areas will now spread to the middle point. It could also be more painful. The human targets will have nowhere to run to.
On April 20 Lt. -Col. Baig, the flower-loving G-1 of the 9th Division, thought that the comb-out would take two months, to the middle of June. But this planning seems to have misfired. The rebel forces, using guerilla tactics, have not been subdued as easily as the army expected. Isolated and apparently uncoordinated, the rebels have none the less bogged down the Pakistan Army in many places by the systematic destruction of roads and railways, without which the army cannot move. The ninth Division for one was hopelessly behind schedule. Now the monsoon threatens to shut down the military operation with three months of cloudbursts.
For the rainy season, the Pakistan Government obtained from China in the second week of May nine shallow draught river gunboats. More are to come. These 80-ton gunboats with massive firepower will take over some of the responsi­bilities hitherto allotted to the air force and artillery, which will not be as effective when it rains. They will be supported by several hundred country craft which have been requisitioned and converted for military use by the addition of outboard motors. The army intends to take to the water in pursuit of the rebels.
There is also the clear prospect of famine, because of the breakdown of the distribution system. Seventeen of the 23 districts of East Pakistan are normally short of food and have to be supplied by massive imports of rice and wheat. This will not be possible this year because of the civil war. Six major bridges and thousands of smaller ones have been destroyed, making the roads impassable in many places. The railway system has been similarly disrupted though the Government claims it is “almost normal”.
The road and rail tracks between the port of Chittagong and the north have been completely disrupted by the rebels who held Feni, a key road and rail junc­tion, until May 7. Food stocks cannot move because of this devastation. In normal times only 15 per cent of food movements from Chittagong to upcountry areas were made by boat. The remaining 85 per cent was moved by road and rail. Even a 100 per cent increase in the effectiveness of river movement will leave 70 per cent of the food stocks in the warehouses of Chittagong.
Two other factors must be added. One is large-scale boarding of grain by people who have begun to anticipate the famine. This makes a tight position in­finitely more difficult. The other is the Government of Pakistan’s refusal to ack­nowledge the danger of famine publicity. Lt. Gen. Tikka Khan, the Military Governor of East Bengal, acknowledged in a radio broadcast on April 18 that he was gravely concerned about food supplies. Since then the entire Government machinery has been used to suppress the fact of the food shortage. The reason is that a famine, like the cyclone before it, could result in a massive outpouring of foreign aid-and with it the prospect of external inspection of distribution methods. That would make it impossible to conceal from the world the scale of the pogrom. So the hungry will be left to die until the clean-up is complete.
Let Them Die of Starvation
Discussing the problem in his plush air-conditioned office in Karachi recently the chairman of the Agricultural Development Bank, Mr. Qarni, said bluntly: “The famine is the result of their acts of sabotage. So let them die. Perhaps then the Bengalis will come to their senses.”
THE MILITARY Government’s East Bengal policy is so apparently contra­dictory and self-defeating that it would seem to justify the assumption that those who rule Pakistan cannot make up their minds. Having committed the initial error of resorting to force, the Government, on this view, is stubbornly and stupidly muddling through.
There is, superficially, logic in this reasoning.
On the one hand, it is true that there is no let up in the reign of terror. The policy of subjugation is certainly being pursued with vigor in East Bengal. This is making thousands of new enemies for the Government every day and making only more definitive the separation of the two wings of Pakistan.
On the other hand, no government could be unaware that this policy must fail (There are just not enough West Pakistanis to hold down the much greater numbers in East Bengal indefinitely. ) For hard administrative and economic reasons, and because of the crucial consideration of external development assistance, especially from America, it will be necessary to achieve a political settlement as quickly as possible. President Yahya Khan’s Press conference on May 25 suggests that he acknowledges the force of these factors: And he said he would announce his plan for represen­tative government in the middle of June.
All this would seem to indicate that Pakistan’s military Government is moving paradoxically, in opposite directions, to compound the gravest crisis in the country’s 24-years history.
This is widely held view. It sounds logical, but is it true?
My own view is that it is not. It has been my unhappy privilege to have had the opportunity to observe at first hand both what Pakistan’s leaders say in the West, and what they are doing in the East.
I think that in reality there is no contradiction in the Government’s East Bengal policy. East Bengal is being colonized.
This is not an arbitrary opinion of mine. The facts speak for themselves.
The first consideration of the army has been and still is the obliteration of every trace of separatism in East Bengal. This proposition is upheld by the continuing slaughter and by everything else that the Government has done in both East and West Pakistan since March 25. The decision was coldly taken by the military leaders, and they are going through with it-all too coldly

.
Will The Killing Stop?
No meaningful or viable political solution is possible in East Bengal while the pogrom continues.
The crucial question is: Will the killing stop?
I was given the army’s answer by Major-General Shaukat Raza, Commanding Officer of the 9th Division, during our first meeting at Comilla on April 16.
“You must be absolutely sure,” he said, ”that we have not undertaken such a drastic and expensive operation-expensive both in men and money-for nothing. We’ve undertaken a job. We are going to finish it, not hand it over half done to the politicians so that they can mess it up again. The army can’t keep coming back like this every three or four years. It has a more important task. I assure you that when we have got through with what we are doing there will never be need again for such an operations”.
Major-General Shaukat Raza is one of the three divisional commanders in the field. He is in a key position. He is not given to talking through his hat.
Significantly, General Shaukat Raza’s ideas were echoed by every military officer I talked to during my 10 days in East Bengal. And President Yahya Khan knows that the men who lead the troops on the ground are the de facto arbiters of Pakistan’s destiny.
The single-mindedness of the army is underscored by the military operation itself. By any standard, it is a major venture. 1t is not something that can be switched on and off without the most grave consequences.
The army has already taken a terrible toll in dead and injured. It was privately said in Dacca that more officers have been killed than men and that the casualty list in East Bengal already exceeds the losses in the India-Pakistan war of September, 1965. The army will certainly not write off these “sacrifices” for illusory political considerations that have proved to be so worthless in the past.
Militarily-and it is soldiers who will be taking the decision-to call a halt to the operation at this stage would be indefensible. It would only mean more trouble with the Bengali rebels. Implacable hatred has been displayed on both sides. There can be no truce or negotiated settlement; only total victory or total defeat. Time is on the side of the Pakistan Army, not of the isolated, unco­ordinated and ill-equipped rebel groups. Other circumstances, such as an expanded conflict which takes in other powers, could of course alter the picture. But as it stands today the Pakistan Army has no reason to doubt that it will eventually achieve its objective. That is why the casualties are stolidly accepted.
The enormous financial outlay already made on the East Bengal operation and its continuing heavy cost also testifies to the Government’s determination. The reckless manner in which funds have been poured out makes clear that the military hierarchy, having taken a calculated decision to use force, has accepted the financial outlay as a necessary investment. It was not for nothing that 25, 000 soldiers were airlifted to East Bengal, a daring and expensive exercise. These two divisions, the 9th and the 16th, constituted the military reserve in West Pakistan. They have now been replaced there by expensive new recruitment.
The Chinese have helped with equipment, which is pouring down the Karakorum highway. There is some evidence that the flood is slowing down: perhaps the Chinese are having second thoughts about their commitments to the military rulers of Pakistan. But the Pakistan Government has not hesitated to pay cash from the bottom of the foreign exchange barrel for more than $ 1-million-worth of ammunition to European arms suppliers.
Conversations with senior military officers in Dacca, Rawalpindi and Karachi confirm that they see the solution to this problem in the speedy completion of the East Bengal operation, not in terms of a pull-out. The money required for that purpose now takes precedence over all other governmental expenditure. Develop­ment has virtually come to a halt.
In one sentence, the Government is too far committed militarily to abandon the East Bengal operation, which it would have to do if it sincerely wanted a political solution. President Yahya Khan is riding on the back of a tiger. But he took a calculated decision to climb up there. SO THE ARMY is not going to pull out. The Government’s policy for East Bengal was spelled out to me in the Eastern Command headquarters at Dacca. It has three elements:­
(I) The Bengalis have proved themselves “unreliable” and must be ruled by West Pakistanis;

(2) The Bengalis will have to be re-educated along proper Islamic lines. The” Islamization of the masses”-this is the official jargon-is intended to eliminate secessionist tendencies and provide a strong religious bond with West Pakistan;
(3) When the Hindus have been eliminated by death and flight, their property will be used as a golden carrot to win over the under-privileged Muslim middle­class. This will provide the base for erecting administrative and political structure–, in the future.
This policy is being pursued with the utmost blatancy.
Because of the mutiny, it has been officially decreed that there will not for the present be any further recruitment of Bengalis in the defense forces. Senior air force and navy officers, who were not in any way involved, have been moved” as a precaution” to non-sensitive positions. Bengali fighter pilots, among them some of the aces of the Air Force, had the humiliation of being grounded and moved to non-flying duties. Even PIA air crews operating between the two wings of the country have been strained clean of Bengalis.
The East Pakistan Rifles, once almost exclusively a Bengali para-military force, has ceased to exist since the mutiny. A new force, the Civil Defense Force, has been raised by recruiting Biharis and volunteers from West Pakistan. Biharis, instead of Bengalis, are also being used as the basic material for the police. They are supervised by officers sent out from West Pakistan and by secondment from the army. The new superintendent of police at Chandpur at the end of April was a military police major.
Hundreds of West Pakistani Government civil servants, doctors, and technicians for the radio, TV, telegraph and telephone services have already been sent out to East Pakistan; More are being encouraged to go with the promise of one and two-step promotions. But the transfer, when made, is obligatory. President Yahya recently issued an order making it possible to transfer civil servants to any part of Pakistan against their will.
I was told that all the commissioners of East Bengal and the district deputy commissioners will in future be either Biharis or civil officers from West Pakistan. The deputy commissioners of the districts were said to be too closely involved with the Awami League secessionist movement. In some cases, such as that of the deputy commissioner of Comilla, they were caught and shot. That particular officer had incurred the wrath of the army on March 20 when he refused to requisition petrol and food supplies “without a letter from Sheikh Mujibur Rahman.”
The Government has also come down hard on the universities and colleges of East Bengal. They were considered the hot beds of conspiracy and they are being “sorted out”. Many professors have fled. Some have been shot. They will be replaced by fresh recruitment from West Pakistan.
Bengali officers are also being weeded out of sensitive positions in the Civil and Foreign Services. All are currently being subjected to the most exhaustive screening.
This colonization process quite obviously does not work even half as efficiently as the administration wishes. I was given vivid evidence of this by Major Agha, Martial Law Administrator of Comilla. He had been having a problem getting the local Bengali executive engineers to go out and repair the bridges and roads that had been destroyed or damaged by the rebels. This task kept getting snarled in red tape, and the bridges remained unrepaired. Agha, of course, knew the reason. ”You can’t expect them to work,” he told me, ”when you have been killing them and destroying their country. That at least is their point of view, and we are paying for it. ”
CAPTAIN DURRANI, of the Baluch Regiment, who was in charge of the company guarding the Comilla airport, had his own methods of dealing with the problem. ” I have told them, ” he said with reference to the Bengalis maintaining the control tower, ” that I will shoot anyone who even looks like he is doing something suspicious.” Durranni had made good his word. A Bengali who had approached the airport a few nights earlier was shot,” Could have been a rebel, ”
I was told. Durrani had another claim to fame. He had personally accounted -more than 60 men” while clearing the villages surrounding the airport.
The harsh reality of colonization in the East is being concealed by shameless window dressing. For several weeks President Yahya Khan and Lt-Gen. Tikka Khan have been trying to get political support in East Pakistan for what they are _. :. -. e. The results have not exactly been satisfying. The support forthcoming so far has been from people like Moulvi Farid Ahmad, a Bengali lawyer in Dacca, Fazlul Quadeer Chaudhary and Professor Ghulam Azam, of the Jamat Islami, all of whom were soundly beaten in the General Elections last December.
The only prominent personality to emerge for this purpose has been Mr. Nurul Amin, an old Muslim Leaguer and former Chief Minister of the Province who was one of only two non-Awami Leaguers to be elected to the National Assembly. He is now in his seventies. But even Nurul Amin has been careful not to be too effusive. His two public statements to date have been concerned only with the “Indian interference”.
Bengalis look with scorn on the few who “collaborate”. Farid Ahmad and Fazlul Quadeer Chaudhury are painfully aware of this. Farid Ahmad makes a point of keeping his windows shuttered and only those who have been scrutinized and recognized through a peephole in the front door are allowed into the house.
By singularly blunt methods the Government has been able to get a grudging acquiescence from 31 Awami Leaguers who had been elected to the national and provincial assemblies. They are being kept on ice in Dacca, secluded from all but their immediate families, for the big occasion when “representative government” is to be installed. But clearly they now represent no one but themselves.
ABDUL BARI the tailor who was lucky to survive is 24 years old. That is the same age as Pakistan. The army can of course hold the country together by force. But the meaning of what it has done in East Bengal is that the dream of the men who hoped in 1947 that they were founding a Muslim nation in two equal parts has now faded. There is now little chance for a long time to come that Punjabis in the West and Bengalis in the East will fell themselves equal fellow-citizens of one nation. For the Bengalis, the future is now bleak: the unhappy submission of a colony to its conquerors.
– Anthony Mascarenhas, Former Assistant Editor, Morning News, Karachi, in Sunday Times, London, June 13, 1971