miltaa hu.n roj khud se ..

मिलता हूँ रोज खुद से, तभी मैं जान पाता हूँ,

गैरों के गम में खुद को, परेशान पाता हूँ।

गद्दार इंसानियत के, जो खुद की खातिर जीते,

जमाने के दर्द से मैं, मोम सा पिंघल जाता हूँ।

ढलती हुयी जिंदगी को, नया नाम दे दो,

बुढ़ापे को तजुर्बे से, नयी पहचान दे दो।

कुछ हँस कर जीते तो कुछ रोकर मरते हैं,

किसी के काम आओ, कोई नया मुकाम दे दो।

माना की व्यस्त हूँ, जिंदगी की दौड़ में,

भूल जाता हूँ मुस्कराना, कमाने की हौड़ में।

थक कर आता हूँ शाम को, जब बच्चों के बीच मैं,

छोड़ आता हूँ सारे गम, गली के मोड़ में।

मुश्किलें आती हैं हरदम, मेरी राहों में,

मेरे हौसले का इम्तिहान लेती हैं।

बताती हैं डरना नहीं मुश्किलों से कभी,

नए रास्ते खोजने का पैगाम देती हैं।

अपनी शख्सियत को इतना ऊंचा बनाओ,

खुद का पता तुम खुद ही बन जाओ।

गैरों के लबों पर तेरा नाम, आये शान से,

मानवता की राह चल, गर इंसान बन जाओ।

किसी कविता में गर नदी सी रवानी हो,

सन्देश देने में न उसका कोई सानी हो।

छंद-अलंकार-नियमो का महत्त्व नहीं होता,

जब कविता ने दुनिया बदलने की ठानी हो।

कोई नागरिक मेरे देश का, नहीं रहे अछूता,

विकास का संकल्प हमारा, बना रहे अनूठा।

तुष्टिकरण का नहीं कोई, यहाँ जाप करेगा,

विकसित भारत, अब दुनिया का सरताज बनेगा।

केसरिया की शान, जगत में सबसे न्यारी,

भारत की धरती, दुनिया में सबसे प्यारी।

छः ऋतुओं का भारत, धारा पर एक मात्र है,

विश्व गुरु बनने की फिर से, कर ली है तैयारी।

फ़क़ीर के हाथ में, न कलम है न धन है,

मगर दुवाओं में किस्मत बदलने का ख़म है।

यह बहम नहीं हकीकत का फ़साना है,

माँ की दुवाओं में सारे जहाँ से ज्यादा दम है।

गिरगिट की तरह रंग बदलते हर पल,

तेरे लफ्जों में तेरा किरदार ढूँढूँ कैसे ?

कबि तौला कभी माशा, तेरे दाँव -पेंच,

तेरे जमीर को आयने में देखूं कैसे ?

मेरे गीत में शामिल थे तुम, तरन्नुम की तरह,

मेरे दर्द में शामिल हुए, बन दर्द की वजह।

सच्ची वफ़ा निभाई है, तुमने सदा मुझसे,

मेरे जनाजे में आये, अजनबी शख्स की तरह।

मंजिल की तलाश में, जो लोग बढ़ गए,

मंजिलों के सरताज, वो लोग बन गए।

बैठे रहे घर में, फकत बात करते रहे,

मंजिलों तक पहुँचना, उनके ख्वाब बन गए।

दुनिया के दर्द को नहीं, अपनी ख़ुशी को नए रंग देता हूँ,

आती जब भी मुसीबत कोई, “शुक्रिया” कह मैं हँस देता हूँ

डॉ अ कीर्तिवर्धन

Reservtion for Women

From J G Aurora

Dear friends,

1. Instead of reviewing the existing system of reservation which has fragmented the nation and perpetuated the caste system, the newly installed BJP-led union government wants to provide for 33 per cent reservation to women in Parliament and State Legislatures as proclaimed in the Presidential address to Parliament on June 9, 2014.

2. Though the policy of reservation for women would please the self-proclaimed ‘leftist liberals’ (who control the main stream media) and the foreign-funded NGOs, it will cause irreparable damage to India’s democracy and the nation’s future.

Though no one can object to the empowerment of women, providing reservation to women in Parliament and State Legislatures cannot be the means to achieve it.

3. The claim that reservation is synonymous with empowerment is fallacious. Instead of indulging in gimmicks like reservation for women, the government needs to look forward and move beyond the divisive politics of reservation.

4. Since the Constitution gives right to women to contest the Parliamentary and State Legislature elections, there is no discrimination against women in this regard. But reserving 33 per cent of these seats for women would debar men from contesting these seats which violates the basic principle of democracy; and which cannot be justified on any ground.

5. Those political parties which believe in women’s reservation can select any number of women as their candidates during elections instead of going for a constitutional amendment to achieve this.

Jai

Islam: A German View

From: Zal Kabraji
Subject: Islam: A German View

Hard to argue with this:
A German’s View on Islam – worth reading. This is one of the best explanations of the Muslim terrorist situation I have ever read. His references to past history are accurate and clear. Not long, easy to understand, and well worth the read. The author of this email is Dr. Emanuel Tanya, a well-known and well-respected psychiatrist. A man, whose family was German aristocracy prior to World War II, owned a number of large industries and estates. When asked how many German people were true Nazis, the answer he gave can guide our attitude toward fanaticism.
‘Very few people were true Nazis,’ he said, ‘but many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come.’
‘My family lost everything. I ended up in a concentration camp and the Allies destroyed my factories.’
‘We are told again and again by ‘experts’ and ‘talking heads’ that Islam is a religion of peace and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace. Although this unqualified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff meant to make us feel better, and meant to somehow diminish the specter of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam.’
‘The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history. It is the fanatics who march. It is the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars worldwide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or honor-kill. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals. It is the fanatics who teach their young to kill and to become suicide bombers.’
‘The hard, quantifiable fact is that the peaceful majority, the ‘silent majority,’ is cowed and extraneous. Communist Russia was comprised of Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 20 million people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant. China’s huge population was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to kill a staggering 70 million people.’
‘The average Japanese individual prior to World War II was not a warmongering sadist. Yet, Japan murdered and slaughtered its way across South East Asia in an orgy of killing that included the systematic murder of 12 million Chinese civilians; most killed by sword, shovel, and bayonet. And who can forget Rwanda, which collapsed into butchery? Could it not be said that the majority of Rwandans were ‘peace loving’?
‘History lessons are often incredibly simple and blunt, yet for all our powers of reason, we often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points: peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence. Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy if they don’t speak up, because like my friend from Germany, they will awaken one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun.’
‘Peace-loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Serbs, Afghans, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians, and many others have died because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late.’
‘Now Islamic prayers have been introduced in Toronto and other public schools in Ontario , and, yes, in Ottawa , too, while the Lord’s Prayer was removed (due to being so offensive?). The Islamic way may be peaceful for the time being in our country until the fanatics move in.’
‘In Australia, and indeed in many countries around the world, many of the most commonly consumed food items have the halal emblem on them. Just look at the back of some of the most popular chocolate bars, and at other food items in your local supermarket. Food on aircraft have the halal emblem just to appease the privileged minority who are now rapidly expanding within the nation’s shores.’
‘In the U.K, the Muslim communities refuse to integrate and there are now dozens of “no-go” zones within major cities across the country that the police force dare not intrude upon. Sharia law prevails there, because the Muslim community in those areas refuse to acknowledge British law.’
‘As for us who watch it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that counts – the fanatics who threaten our way of life.’
Lastly, anyone who doubts that the issue is serious and just deletes this email without sending it on, is contributing to the passiveness that allows the problems to expand.
Extend yourself a bit and send this on. Let us hope that thousands world-wide read this, think about it, and send it on before it’s too late, and we are silenced because we were silent!!!

Article 370 of India constitution can be repealed

Article 370 of India constitution can be repealed
DC | K.N. Bhat | June 07, 2014, 06.06 am IST

Article 370 – Special status to the state of Jammu & Kashmir

“Mark my words and save this tweet — long after Modi government is a distant memory either J&K won’t be part of India or Article 370 will still exist,” Omar Abdullah, the Chief Minister of India’s 15th state, tweeted in his response to a minister’s statement on the special status accorded to Jammu and Kashmir.

Audacity unlimited! And ignorance unbounded! The Chief Minister appears to be under the wrong impression that he can give talaaq and separate Jammu and Kashmir from India at will.

According to the Omar school of thought, Article 370 of the Constitution of India cannot be touched except with the consent of the J&K Assembly. And if that Article is abrogated, the status of J&K before accession would automatically stand restored. Should that mean that Dr. Karan Singh, son of the last ruler of Kashmir, will be recognized as the ruler of J&K, and everything that happened after the accession would be void? No, that may not be acceptable.

On the eve of India and Pakistan becoming separate dominions, Indian Independence Act 1947, read with the Government of India Act 1935, gave the rajas and maharajas of British India three options: become part of India, become a part of Pakistan or remain independent states. Within the specified period — between August 15 and October 6, 1947 — 560-plus erstwhile rulers signed documents with the title “Instrument of Accession”, and thereby agreed to become part of the dominion of India. This was to be followed by instruments of merger, thereby becoming part of India and ending the original identity of the princely state — many princes executed both the documents one after the other, while some had hesitation to sign the merger treaty.

The process of merger in respect of all except J&K was completed in October 1949. At the insistence of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, the agreement to pay compensation to the princes for merging with India — the Privy Purse — was given a constitutional status through the introduction of Article 291. The ruler of Jammu and Kashmir wanted to remain independent, but when the Pakistanis were about to capture his kingdom, the raja in distress executed the Instrument of Accession on October 26, 1947 — the offer was accepted by Governor- General Lord Mountbatten the very next day with a gratuitous condition that after peace returned to the state, the people’s wish would be ascertained on the issue of accession. This was just a wish in view of the belated accession, not a precondition for accession authorized by law.

The Instruments of Accession were cyclostyled documents — the one signed by Raja Hari Singh was no different from the one signed by, say, Maharaja of Mysore. So much so the Kashmir king’s impressive string of titles — Shriman Inder Mahender Rajrajeswar Maharajadhiraj Shri Hari Singhji, Jammu and Kashmir Naresh Tatha Tibbetadi Deshadhipathi, Ruler of Jammu and Kashmir — had to be squeezed into the long enough blanks allotted in the specified form. So the document executed by Raja Hari Singh was just another Instrument of Accession with no special concessions or reservations.
In normal circumstances, merger of J&K with India should have taken place before October end, but a brilliant self-goal scored by Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, in the form of a complaint to the UNO and the consequent UN intervention, prevented it. The merger had to be postponed until the dispute was settled — and that dispute is still pending.

Again, at the insistence of Nehru, Article 370, according special status to J&K, was added at the far end of the deliberations of the Constituent Assembly. B.R. Ambedkar openly opposed the idea and refused to take part in drafting Article 370, while other members of the Constituent Assembly, according to Gopalasway, a member of the Constituent Assembly, condescended to this “gift from Nehru to his friend Sheikh Abdullah” in the firm belief that this was a temporary measure.
Recall the Privy Purse case. Indira Gandhi, following the split in the Congress, resorted to measures intended to project her as the only champion of the poor. One such gimmick was abolition of Privy Purse in 1970 — at that time the total burden on the exchequer on this account was about Rs 4 crore per year. A blatant breach of a constitutional obligation and of a solemn promise was sought to be committed by deleting Article 291.

But the move was defeated by one vote in the Rajya Sabha. Bitterly bitten by this humiliation, the Indira government got a presidential notification issued, derecognizing the princes. That notification was struck down by the Supreme Court (1971). Soon thereafter, equipped with the needed numerical strength in Parliament, the 21st Amendment Act was passed. It was the shortest amendment reading, “Article 291 be deleted”. The Amendment Act was also challenged. However, the Supreme Court upheld the abolition of Privy Purse by deleting Article 291 after observing that Article 368 permits such an amendment. “We are concerned only with the legality not morality,” said the court (1983).

Arguments on the scope and interpretation of Article 370 may end before the Supreme Court of India, or may be not if the issue assumes international color. But what is not in doubt is that the Indian Parliament can amend the Indian Constitution even by deleting Article 370.

The amending power under Article 368 is plenary and in exercise of it Parliament can simply delete Article 370. Article 368(1) reads: “Notwithstanding anything contained in this Constitution, Parliament may in exercise of its constituent power amend by way of addition, variation or repeal any provision of this Constitution in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Article.”

So long as the basic structure of the Constitution is not altered, Parliament’s amending power is unlimited — what is the Constitution’s basic structure is not defined, but a temporary provision like Article 370 cannot be part of it. No agreement or treaty can restrict the scope of this constitutional provision.
Once Article 370 stands repealed, the Instrument of Accession may become operational to the extent that it is consistent with the Constitution — the proclaimed allegiance to the Government of India Act 1935 would extend to its successor, the Constitution of India.

The assertion by any citizen that J&K or any other state is not governed by the Indian Constitution may amount to an act of sedition. The seemingly unending Kashmir problem was born out of a single folly of a single man — Nehru stopping Sardar Patel from dealing with Kashmir. Through a series of more such follies, a Frankenstein of a state has been created that dares the nation even to discuss an issue relating to it. With the passage of time the problem may only get aggravated. What should be done? To begin with, try to win the co-operation of the Kashmiri politicians and MPs from the rest of India to suitably amend and attenuate Article 370; failing this repeal it. Hopefully, well before the Modi government is forgotten, the Kashmiri people would have forgotten Article 370.

The writer is a senior advocate of the Supreme Court and former additional solicitor-general of India.
He can be reached at knbhat1@gmail.com
__._,_.___
________________________________________
Posted by: nalin parekh

P. Deivamuthu’s Letter to PM Modi

My Letter to PM on Simple ways to Hinduise Bharat
P. Deivamuthu, Editor, Hindu Voice
(This letter was sent by Speed Post on 28th May 2014)

(The inserts in italics are by Skanda987.)

27th May 2014

Shri Narendra Modi Ji
Prime Minister of India
Gujarat Bhavan
New Delhi 110001

Dear Prime Minister, Modiji, Pranaam.

Sub: Simple ways to Hinduise Bharat

At the outset, let me congratulate you for leading the BJP to a grand victory, and becoming the first non-Congress Prime Minister of our nation with a clear majority. Your oath taking ceremony on 26th May was indeed grandeur, with the presence of many Hindu saints and RSS leaders.

Hindu Voice, a Monthly in English and Hindi, is not unknown to you. Directorate of Information, Govt. of Gujarat, is a Life Member of Hindu Voice. Copies are also posted to you personally. You have also conveyed your Best Wishes to Hindu Voice, many years ago, vide your letter dated 7th March 2003.

Hindu Voice has special relationship with Gujarat. It was launched in April 2002, in memory of the 58 Karsevaks burnt alive at Godhra on 27th Feb. 2002. Hindu Voice has been consistently campaigning for making you the PM candidate. In fact, in my editorial in Hindu Voice as early as June 2008, I had pleaded that you be declared as the PM candidate for the 2009 parliamentary election itself. I am happy that this has happened in 2014 and because of that we have got our Second Independence.

As the Editor of Hindu Voice, I have been propagating that Hindutva (Hinduism) is Rashtriyatuva (Nationalism), and Hindutva is the only unifying factor of all Indians. Hindutva encompasses everything humanity stands for, including secularism and democracy. Hindutva is not divisive; it is inclusive. I am sure that most of our Muslim and Christian brothers too will agree on this fact. By electing BJP and its allies overwhelmingly, the people have confirmed my stand. Therefore, more emphasis should be placed on Hindutva, so that our unity is further strengthened, and secularism and democracy thrive.
(Secularism is a European medicine against Christianity. The Hindu dharma is inherently tolerant of all the tolerant faiths. Therefore ti does not need secularism. Islaam /Koran/Sharia is against a democratic government. Therefore,those Muslims who want to live in democratic nation, need to give up Islaam. – Skanda987)

This will also be in accordance with our constitution. Our constitution bears the pictures of Sri Ram, Sri Krishna, Lord Natraj, Lord Mahavir, Lord Bhuddha, Vedic Yajna, Kurukshetra, Geeta Upadesh, Lanka Vijay and Sita Uddhar, etc. etc. Therefore, it is a Hindu Constitution.
(It has some anti-Hindu lines. – Skanda987)

Our Constitution Makers too were well aware that the identity of our Nation is Hindu. Vedic slogans like ‘Satyameva Jayate’, ‘Satyam, Shivan, Sundaram’, ‘Dharma-Chakra-Pravartana’, etc. were used by various Govt. Depts. Because it is a Hindu Nation, they felt, India was, is and will always remain ‘secular’. Hence, they never felt the need for the word ‘secular’ in the preamble to our Constitution (which was inserted by Smt. Indira Gandhi during Emergency). Hindus, by nature, are secular, and Hinduism is perforce secularism.
Here are a few more proofs that India is a Hindu nation – legally, spiritually and culturally. Indian Satellites are named Aryabhata, Baskara, Rohini, etc. Our missiles are named Agni, Prithvi, Akash, etc. Our war ships are named INS Vikrant, Viraat, Vikramatitya, Godavari, Ganga, Brahmaputra, Shivalik, Abhay, Sarayu, Sukanya, Varuna, Tarangini, etc. Our Submarines are named Sindhudhvaj, Sindhughosh, Sindhuratna, etc. Our battle tanks are named Arjun, Bhishma, Ajeya, etc. All the above names are associated with Hindu culture. If one enters into the BARC Complex at Trombay (Mumbai), one is pleasantly surprised to find that all the multi-story buildings there are named Aruna, Varun, Godavari, Kaveri, Ganga, Yamuna, Saraswati, Prayag, Narmada, etc. – all our sacred rivers.

However, the Nehruvian Congress had not only tried to hide these Hindu spiritual and cultural elements in our constitution, but had tried to drain the nation of its spiritualism and culture. It was trying to detach this nation from its Hindu roots and make India into an adharmic (dharma-nirpeksh) state. Hence it had spread a canard that Hinduism is communal and only minorities are secular, which led to divisiveness in the society. This anomaly has to be set right and the nation has to be brought to its Hindu moorings, which is its soul.

The anti-Vedic names of monuments, cities, and streets in Hindusan need to be replaced with Vedic names. Some monuments, e.g. Kutub Minar is a monument of humiliation or reminder of unhappy defeat. Such monuments need to be removed or re-converted o Vedic glory.

Now that you have made India Congress-free and there is a radically transformed environment in the nation, there needs to be a paradigm shift in your Govt.’s approach towards ‘secularism’ and ‘communalism’, in letter and spirit. Your Govt. should recognize the spiritual and cultural sentiments of the people and our Constitution Makers, and hinduise Bharat. Muslims and Christians need not fear. There will be complete religious freedom in a Hinduised Bharat, but their loyalty to Bharat should be beyond doubt. (Islaam does not allow Muslims to be loyal to anything except Islaam. – Skanda987)

While development and good governance is important, which I am sure you will provide, the need for national integration is of paramount importance. Going to a Temple, Mosque or Church is a personal choice, but everyone should be absolutely loyal to Mother India. We have had enough of Nehruvian Secularism and Macaulayism. Now, let the country get back to its civilizational roots. Hence, you should take the following steps to Hinduise Bharat.

Your Govt. should proclaim and propagate that
(a) India was, is and will be a Hindu nation, citing the above examples, (b) Hindutva (Hinduism) is Nationalism (Rashtriyatva) and not communalism, as the Nehruvian Congress has made us to believe;
(c) Hinduism is a Way of Life, as confirmed by our Supreme Court, and is not against any religion;
(The Vedic dharma is universal religion for mankind. That is why it is called dharma. It is against any asuric or barbaric or ideology or demoniac religion. – Skanda987)
(d) any act done in the name of Hinduism is not communal; It is just national, and conforms to our constitution, and
(e) the survival of secularism and democracy, and the unity and integrity of India is directly related to the preservation and growth of Hinduism.
(Becaue the Vedic dharma is tolerant of all the tolerant faiths, Bharat needs to be made a Hindu nation – Hindustan. – Skand987)

The following simple methods will make India a truly Hindu nation – in other words more secular and democratic – without in any way altering the basic features of our Constitution.

1. Print new currency notes and coins with the picture of “Maa Laxmi”, replacing Mahatma Gandhi’s picture. Hindus identify money with Devi Laxmi. So, befitting that sentiment, it is natural that Maa Laxmi’s picture should appear on all currency notes and coins. Withdraw all old notes.

The UPA Govt. had brought out coins embossing the picture of Sister Alphonsa, Cross, Vaishnav Devi. etc. So there is no legality involved in putting the picture of Maa Laxmi on currency notes. This will also solve the black money problem within the country. Also, the picture of Devi Laxmi will deter ISI from printing counterfeit notes in Pakistan.

2. Make the slogans ‘Bharat Mata Ki Jai’ and ‘Vande Mataram’ compulsory for every citizen, to ensure their absolute loyalty to India – Indian first and Hindu, Muslim, Christian later. These were the slogans which kindled nationalist feelings amongst Indians and brought them together during our freedom movement. They unite all Indians, irrespective of their caste, creed, language, religion and region.

At the time of partition, Babasaheb Ambedkar desired that there should be exchange of population – all Muslims must be sent to Pakistan – as Dr. Ambedkar knew that Islam and democracy cannot co-exist. Dr. Rajendra Prasad desired that those Muslims who stayed back must be disenfranchised – no voting rights for Muslims. While Babasaheb’s suggestions are time-barred, we can implement Dr. Rajendra Prasad’s suggestions and weed out those who say ‘I am a Muslim/Christian first, Indian later’. Any one refusing to say ‘Bharat Mata Ki Jai’ and ‘Vande Mataram’ should be disenfranchised. The application form to enroll new voters should carry an undertaking to this effect. Also, these slogans should be made compulsory for every Govt. employee.

3. Make the singing of our National Anthem – Jana Gana Mana,
(Replace jana gana mana with vande maataram. Rationale: jana gana mana was written to praise the England’s king or queen. – Skanda987.)
and ending it with ‘Bharat Mata Ki Jai’ and ‘Vande Mataram’ – compulsory for all candidates at the time of filing their nomination papers for MPs and MLAs. If anyone fails or refuses to sing Jana Gana Mana, ending it with ‘Bharat Mata Ki Jai’ and ‘Vande Mataram’, his nomination should be rejected. Otherwise, we cannot stop a Pervez Musharrafs, Dawood Ibrahims or an Abu Salims from fighting (standing for) elections, and may even become the PM.

4. Similarly, at the time of taking oath by MLAs, MPs, Ministers, CMs, PM, and President, they should say at the end ‘Bharat Mata Ki Jai’ and ‘Vande Mataram’. Refusing to say so will disqualify him from holding that position.

Islaam does not allow it. Islaam is against any democratic Gov. Therefore Islaam needs to be purged out of any democratic country. One cannot hold on to Islaam and take such a Vedic oath.

5. Ban the word ‘minority’. Nowhere in the world are the citizens divided into ‘minority’ and ‘majority’ on the basis of religion. (Are Hindus/Muslims settled in USA, UK, Canada, etc. called minorities there? No.) Our Constitution too prohibits the word ‘Religious minority’. In fact, it was a distortion by our Nehruvian Congress with vote bank consideration. We are all Indians, with equal rights and duties. Going to a temple, mosque or church is one’s personal choice.

Going to mosques and madressas means learning to do jihad against the Hindus, and learning Arab nationalism. So, it works against the interests of the Vedic nation.

6. This will naturally bring us (our attention) to the ‘National Minority Commission Act of 1992’ – an act meant to divide the Indian society. This act itself is unconstitutional. It ultra vires Article 15 (1) of our constitution. (“The State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, and place of birth or any of them”). It goes without saying that the appointment of the Sachchar Committee is also unconstitutional.

7. Bring in an “Endangered Civilization Protection Act” to save Sanatan Hindu Dharm, Hindu civilization, Hindu practices, Hindu believes, Hindu scriptures, our heritage, culture and traditions, and to stop conversion.

(Instead, by the majority grass-root action, make Bharat a Vedic state – Hindusan – where anti-Vedic ideologies and religions will be illegal. Then the various Vedic sampadayas need to begin spreading dharma to interested people. When done effectively, dharma will spread. Dharma glaani among the Hindus need to be removed, but not by any external forces. – Skanda987)

8. Give Moral Policing Powers to some of our Hindu Organizations. To protect villagers from Maoists, Salva Judum was created in Chttisgarh. Similarly, to protect and preserve Hindu Dharma, Beliefs, practices, scriptures, culture, tradition, etc. moral/cultural policing rights should be given to selected Hindu Organizations and Ashrams. Their members, working in tandem with the local police, should have the power to stop any one from demeaning or tarnishing Hindu Gods, Hindu Way of Life, Hindu culture, Hindu scriptures, etc., arrest them and hand them over to the Police for further action. They can also identify infiltrators and hand them over to the police for deportation.
(A way to do this produce well trained 2 million Vedic preachres and pujaaris. Then deploy 2 each in every 1 million villages of Bharat. Their mission: To practice dharma correctly, to teach others how to practice it correctly, to engage the Vedics in Hindu programs (satsang, pujaa, havan, sankirtan, etc.; and to debate with those who come to convert Hindus. – Skanda987)

9. Make the lighting of our traditional lamp at every Govt. function compulsory. Any one refusing to light the lamp must be disqualified. Similarly, all Govt. offices should perform “Satyanarayan Pooja”, once in a year. It is purely scientific as Yagna purifies the atmosphere.
(I would say have discourse on Bhagvad Gita instead, by well qualified aacharyas or swamis. – Skanda987)

10. Bring a new law to declare anyone as persona non grata who intentionally – insults our National Anthem; refuses to say ‘Bharat Mata Ki Jai’ and ‘Vande Mataram’; shouts Pakistan Jindabad; insults our security forces; burns our National flag; spews venom in the name of religion and castes; talks of dividing India; supports giving away any part of India; talks of human rights for terrorists; etc. Their voting rights and fundamental rights must be forfeited, and they be allowed to just subsist.

11. All the criminals in jail, especially those arrested for terrorist activities, must be forced to do Yoga for one hour every day morning. They must also be given religious discourse every day evening for two hours, by different Hindu sadhus. This will reform 80% of the criminals. (They must be served only vegetarian foods. No cell phones for them. –Skanda987)

12. Remove all religious subsidy. No Islamic country gives subsidy to Haj. Giving subsidy to Haj and Jerusalem is against secularism. Also scrap all reservations on religious basis. It is against Islaam also.)

13. Bring in Uniform Civil Code, with provisions that anyone having more than one wife or more than three children will be debarred from standing for election.
(No Sharia law in the desh. No one should be guilty until proven in court. Burden to prove a defendant is guilty should be on the plaintiff. – Skanda987)

14. Ban Slaughter of Cow and its progeny, and give incentive to Cow Rearing (Go Paalan). When a cow bears a calf, the person who maintains the cow should be given a lump sum as incentive.

(No national holiday for any anti-Vedic religion or ideology. –Skanda987)

15. Give incentive to Ved Pathshalas and Sanskrit learning. Schools teaching Sanskrit and students learning Sanskrit should be given incentive. Incentive being given to Arab learning should be withdrawn. We do not want to spread Arab culture in India.
(The media should use pure Hindi or pure any language. No khichri. –Skanda987)

16. Pave the way for building a magnificent Ram Temple in Ayodhya, and also for reconstructing temples in Mathura and Kashi.

(Bharat will have lasting peace when the current Muslims of Bharat (after quitting Islaam) will help build Ram Mandir back where it was; and when there will not be riots if Koran is buried in the Vedic land. Remember that when Manu Smriti was buried around 1947 time, there was no protect or riot by the Hindus. –Skanda987)

17. Vedic slogans like ‘Satyameva Jayate’, ‘Satyam, Shivan, Sundaram’, ‘Dharma-Chakra-Pravartana’, etc. must be restored with its original glory. Every govt. stationery should carry the slogan ‘Satyameva Jayate’. DD logo should include ‘Satyam, Shivan, Sundaram’, and the Chair of Lok Sabha speaker should bear ‘Dharma-Chakra-Pravartana’. All these Vedic slogans were removed by the Nehruvian Congress.

18. Review the laws governing (restricting) Hindus, which tries to destroy Hindu family institution. For example, the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, trivializes Hindu marriages as Civil Contracts and promotes live-in relationship. It also ridicules the spiritual and cultural significance and sacredness of Hindu marriages.
(This is like Islamic Muthaa low. Muthaa means temporary marriage for sex. It is anti-Vedic. and is adharma. – Skanda987)
We worship women as goddesses – Laxmi, Saraswati and Durga – and also Ardha-nareeshwar for giving half of his body to his spouse. Such a spiritualism and culture cannot be allowed to be hijacked in the name of women empowerment.

19. Shiv Sena supremo late Balasaheb Thackrey and Shri Subhash Desai (present MLA, Goregaon, Mumbai) were debarred from voting for six years, for asking for votes in the name of Hindutva. So then why no Muslim or Christian is similarly debarred for asking for votes in the name of Allah and Jesus Christ, which they wantonly do? This must be reversed. Asking for votes in the name of Hindutva or Hinduism is no offence, as it is a way of Life according to our Supreme Court. Conversely (Therefore), make asking for votes in the name of Allah and Jesus Christ an offence.

20. Ban the use of Loudspeaker in Mosques and Churches. In a secular country claiming to respect all religions, shouting publicly that ‘There is no God except Allah’ and ‘Jesus is the only Saviour’ is preposterous. (These two religions are anti-Vedic and are invaded in Bharat. They do not belong in Bharat. –Skanda987)

21. Your Gov’t should free Hindu Mandirs from govt. control. Also the Govt. should provide basic facilities at all Hindu Pilgrimage sites and River Ghats (such as Wash rooms, bathrooms, change rooms, etc.)
(See an article at below link describing the kind of temles we need.
https://skanda987.wordpress.com/2011/07/05/the-kind-of-temples-the-hindus-need-2/ )

22. Change the name of our Motherland to ‘Bharat’ by removing the ambiguity in the Constitution and the word ‘India’. Also, change names of all places and roads – like Allahabad, Aurangabad, Ahmedabad, Aurangzeb Road, St. Xavier Road, etc. – with that of our freedom fighters.

23. Change the weekly holidays from Sunday to Monday or Tuesday. {The timing of presenting Indian budget in parliament was changed from 5.30 pm (which was continued by the Nehruvian Congress, to suit Britishers) to 11.00 am by the NDA Govt.}.

24. Change the school uniform of girl students – from Skirts (meant for Christian nuns) to Salvar-Kamis with Thuppatta.

After winning the elections, your visiting Kashi and performing pooja and Ganga Aarthi there (on 17th May) proudly sporting the sacred ash and tilak on your forehead, in the full glare of the TV is indeed a bold message to the nation that you are a Hindu Nationalist. Your bowing before parliament and placing your forehead on its steps (on 20th May), exactly like Hindu devotees do before a entering temple, proves that you are showing the nation of its Hindu ethos. Please extend this further and Hinduise Bharat by implementing the above suggestions.

If you implement even some of my above suggestions during the first few years of your Prime Ministership, I am sure the entire nation will remain indebted to you. A Hinduised Bharat will vote for you to be its PM for at least another two terms.

Thanking you and wishing you a long inning as PM,

Yours, In the Services of Bharat Mata
P. Deivamuthu, Editor, Hindu Voice.

From Amit Bhadhuri

Dear Suresh Ji,

You have the liberty to print any of my writings in your blog. You don’t need to ask me at all.

I am an Indian Hindu Brahmin, Indian nationalist, committed Hindu religion. The welfare and progress of my motherland is of paramount interest to me. I practice and preach uncompromising honesty and lead my life with examples. I have high values and principles in life and great believer in straight talk.

I was an Inspector in the Central Industrial Security Force, resigned over 36 years ago and settled in England. Since in UK, I have worked as Ed Welfare Officer and finally as Legal Officer with the Local Govt.

I am married with grown up off-springs.

Thank you,
Amit

About Vedic Punishment (Hindi)

वैदिक दंड व्यवस्था पर विचार

वैदिक दंड व्यवस्था विषय में एक शंका हमारे समक्ष आई हैं। शंका इस प्रकार हैं की एक और वेदों में विश्व में सम्पूर्ण मानव जाति के लिए शांति का सन्देश हैं जबकि दूसरी ओर वेदों में शत्रु को जड़ से नष्ट करने का, उसके प्राण हरने का, उसके राज्य को भंग करने का स्पष्ट आदेश हैं। इसके अतिरिक्त वेदों में विभिन्न प्रकार के अस्त्र और शास्त्र का उल्लेख होना क्या दर्शाता हैं ? शांति और शत्रुओं का नाश करना इन दोनों बातों में परस्पर विरोध हैं, ऐसा कैसे संभव हैं? एक अन्य शंका यह थी की इस दंड व्यवस्था को कौन लागू करेगा।

यह शंका नवीन नहीं हैं। पूर्व में भी यह शंका पहले कई बार सामने आई हैं और इसका यथोचित समाधान भी किया गया हैं। जैसे पूर्व में अब्दुल गफूर से महाशय धर्मपाल बनने और फिर दोबारा से अब्दुल गफूर बनने पर मुसलमानों में धाक ज़माने के लिए आर्य समाज और स्वामी दयानंद के विरुद्ध कुछ पुस्तकें प्रकाशित की गई थी। इन पुस्तकों में से एक उर्दू पुस्तक थी “वेद और स्वामी दयानंद”। इस पुस्तक में इसी शंका को अब्दुल गफूर ने प्रस्तुत किया हैं। अब्दुल गफूर लिखता हैं “वेदों के इज़हार से पेशतर दुनिया में इस क़िस्म के कुश्त व ख़ून और जंग व हदल जारी थे और कि वेदों की तालीम से पहले ही लोग तोप बन्दूक़ और तीर व कमान से एक दूसरे को हलाक कर रहे थे तो उनसे सिर्फ़ यही नहीं कि इस दावे की कि वेदों का इलहाम शुरू दुनिया में हुआ, तरदीद हो जाती है। बल्कि वेदों के सर पर ये इलज़ाम आयद हो जाता है कि जिस सूरत में कि ये जंग व हदल और कुश्त व ख़ून वेदों से पहले ही जारी थे तो वेदों ने अपनी तालीम से बजाये इनका ख़ात्मा करने या सुलह की तालीम देने के जलती आग पर और भी घी डाल दिया और जंग व जदल कुश्त व ख़ून करने फ़ौज भर्ती करने, तीर कमान, तोप बन्दूक़ और अनवाअ़ व अक़साम के आतिशीं और बिजली के असलहे तैयार करने की ऐसी ख़तरनाक तालीम दी कि तमाम दुनिया शोला-ए-ग़ार बन गयी। ”

मुसलमानों द्वारा इस शंका को उठाये जाने का मुख्य कारण क़ुरान में जिहाद के नाम पर गैर मुसलमानों के ऊपर विभिन्न प्रकार के अत्याचार, उनके जायदाद छीनने, उनको गुलाम बनाने, उनका कत्ल करने सम्बन्धी जो आयतें हैं उनको वेदों का सहारा लेकर जायज ठहराने का एक असफल प्रयास हैं।

कारण स्पष्ट हैं वेदों में शत्रु और क़ुरान में शत्रु की परिभाषा में पर्याप्त भेद हैं। वेदों में शत्रु उसे कहा गया हैं जो दुराचारी हैं, पापी हैं, अज्ञानी हैं, दुष्ट हैं। ऐसा व्यक्ति कोई भी हो सकता हैं चाहे वह किसी भी मत मतान्तर का हो जबकि क़ुरान के अनुसार शत्रु वो हैं जो गैर मुस्लिम हो, जो क़ुरान की शिक्षाओं पर विश्वास नहीं लाता हो और जो मुहम्मद साहिब को अंतिम पैगम्बर नहीं मानता हो। यहाँ पर वेदों की विस्तृत परिभाषा के समक्ष क़ुरान की सोच संकीर्ण नजर आती हैं क्यूंकि वेदों के अनुसार विश्व का कोई भी व्यक्ति, चाहे वह किसी भी मत-मतान्तर का हो अपने श्रेष्ठ कर्मों से धार्मिक बन सकता हैं जबकि क़ुरान के अनुसार वही धार्मिक हैं जो मुस्लमान हैं। स्पष्ट हैं की यहाँ पर भेद एक और कर्म का हैं दूसरी और विश्वास का हैं। यही भेद धर्म और मजहब अथवा मतमतांतर की नींव रखता हैं।

अब वैदिक दंड व्यवस्था को समझने का प्रयास करते हैं। सभी जानते हैं की वेदों में आलंकारिक भाषा शैली हैं। विभिन्न प्रकार के विज्ञान को कम से कम शब्दों में वेदों वर्णित किया गया हैं। शत्रु को दंड देने उसे केवल शारीरिक दंड देना नहीं हैं। पाप कर्म का मुख्य कारण अज्ञानता हैं। अज्ञानता का शत्रु सत्य ज्ञान हैं। ज्ञान से मनुष्य का उद्धार करना भी तो शत्रु का नाश कहलाता हैं। कठोपनिषद में यम नचिकेता के संवाद में यमाचार्य को मृत्यु का देवता बतलाया गया हैं। क्या यम नचिकेता के प्राण हरने आये थे? नहीं! अपितु यमाचार्य वहां पर नचिकेता को ज्ञान प्राप्त करवाने आये थे अर्थात उसकी अज्ञानता का नाश करने आये थे। इसलिए अज्ञानता का नाश शत्रुता का नाश हैं।

वैदिक दंड व्यवस्था को लागु करने का भर राजा अर्थात क्षत्रिय एवं ब्राह्मण अर्थात विद्वान पर हैं। क्षत्रिय राजा और ब्राह्मण के कर्तव्यों का वैदिक वांग्मय में विस्तृत रूप सेवर्णन मिलता हैं।

ऋग्वेद 1/14/9 में राजा के लिए आदेश प्रजा के भक्षक, समाज विघातक, भ्रष्टाचारी, दुष्ट बुद्धि, दुखदायी, दुश्चरित्र आदि को नाना प्रकार के दंड से दण्डित करे और प्रजा में न रहने दे।

अथर्ववेद 3/1/1 में सन्देश हैं की सेनापति राष्ट्र के शत्रुओं का नाश करे।

अथर्ववेद 3/19/3-1 में पुरोहित के कर्तव्यों का वर्णन करते हुए लिखा हैं की हम पुरोहित राष्ट्र में सदा जागरूक रहे, अपने कर्तव्यों का तत्परता और सतर्कता से पालन करते रहें तथा ज्ञान के द्वारा अज्ञान का तथा क्षात्र के द्वारा बाह्य शत्रुओं का नाश होता रहे।

ऋग्वेद 10/137/1 में शिक्षा हैं की सत्य निष्ठ निष्पाप विद्वान ऐसे नीच, मृत समान व्यक्तियों (पापी और अपराधी) को भी उत्तम धर्मोपदेश देकर उनके अंदर फिर पवित्र दिव्य जीवन का संचार करते हैं।

ऋग्वेद 1/106/3 में शिक्षा हैं की पाप, भ्रष्टाचार और दुराचार से बचाने का कार्य अनुभवी पिता के समान ज्ञान-उपदेश द्वारा पालन करनेवाले गुरुजनों और विद्वान माता-पिता का हैं।

वेदों के अनुसार त्यागी, तपस्वी विद्वान साधु महात्माओं के प्रेमपूर्वक समझाने पर भी जो भ्रष्टाचार और दुराचार का परित्याग न करके समाज के लिए विघातक हो उनको राजा द्वारा कठोर दंड देना चाहिए, उन पर दया नहीं दिखलानी चाहिए। थोड़े से लोगों को भी ऐसा कठोर दंड देने से अन्य लोग प्रेरणा प्राप्त कर उन पाप कार्यों में निवृत नहीं होंगे। इसीलिए वेदों में दंड विधान में छोटे दंड से लेकर कारागार, कारागार से लेकर मृत्यु दंड तक का विधान हैं। अस्त्र-शस्त्र का उद्देश्य केवल दूसरे पर आक्रमण करना ही नहीं हैं अपितु शत्रु से प्राण रक्षा भी हैं। इसलिए यह केवल कुतर्क ही हैं की वेदों में अस्त्र-शस्त्र के वर्णन और उनके प्रयोग से विश्व की शांति भंग होती हैं। वेदों के अनुसार विश्व में शांति स्थापित करने के उद्देश्य से ही दंड व्यवस्था का प्रावधान हैं। अगर समाज में चोर, डाकू, भ्रष्टाचारी लोग अपने कुकृत्य में लगे रहेंगे तो समाज में शांति की स्थापना हो ही नहीं सकती। इसलिए उनका उचित समाधान निकालने से ही शांति संभव हैं। वेदों में सामान्य प्रजा जो अपना धर्मानुसार जीवन व्यतीत कर रही हैं को प्रताड़ित करने का नहीं अपितु उसकी रक्षा करने का आदेश हैं इसलिए वेदों पर विश्व शांति को भंग करने का दोष लगन बचकानी बात हैं।

एक और बात की वेदों में पाप कर्म होने से पूर्व ही उसके दंड के होने का विधान का पहले से होना ईश्वर के सर्वज्ञ होने के सिद्धांत को सिद्ध करता हैं। वैदिक व्यवस्था “Necessity is the mother of invention” अर्थात आवश्यकता आविष्कार की जननी हैं के विपरीत हैं। जैसे ईश्वर ने मनुष्य के जन्म से पहले प्रकाश के लिए सूर्य, पीने के लिए जल, श्वास लेने के लिए वायु का निर्माण सृष्टि उत्पत्ति के समय किया उसी प्रकार मनुष्य को क्या करना हैं और क्या नहीं करना हैं ऐसा सन्देश वेद रूपी ज्ञान के माध्यम से पहले ही प्राप्त करा दिया। इसलिए वेदों में पाप कर्म करने पर दंड आदि का स्पष्ट विधान हैं। ईश्वर पूर्व की, वर्तमान की और भविष्य की सभी सृष्टियों से परिचित हैं। इसलिए ईश्वर ने मानव जीवन में समय समय पर व्यवहार में आने वाली समस्याओं से से भी परिचित हैं। इसलिए ईश्वर ने उनके समाधान के लिए दिशा निर्देश वेद ज्ञान रूप में सृष्टि के आदि में ही दे दिया। वैदिक दंड व्यवस्था निश्चित रूप से व्यवाहरिक, सार्वभौमिक एवं सार्वकालिक हैं।

डॉ विवेक आर्य
वैदिक दंड व्यवस्था पर विचार

‘Allah says I should sell. He commands me to sell. I will sell women. I sell women’.

From: M Patel

‘Allah says I should sell. He commands me to sell. I will sell women. I sell women’.

Religion
by Taslima Nasreen

“I abducted your girls. I will sell them in the market, by Allah,” a man claiming to be Boko Haram leader Abubakar Shekau said.

“There is a market for selling humans. Allah says I should sell. He commands me to sell. I will sell women. I sell women,” he continued.

There is no reason to not believe what this man is saying. Once upon a time when a man said, ‘Allah asked me to f**k my wife’s slave, so I f**ked. Or Allah asked me to f**k my son’s wife, so I f**ked. Or Allah asked me to f**k the captive women, so I f**ked’, everybody believed in him. People still believe in that f**ker.

So what is the problem to believe now that the Nigerian man is telling the truth that Allah asks him to sell women? He should get billions of followers. Allah talks to him, he must be a prophet. Who the f**k says there will be no more prophet? Abubakar Shekau must have direct contact with Allah, or who will give him a bunch of anti-women advices but Him?

Long live Abubakar Shekau (peace be upon him)! (Skanda987 thinks this is a sarcastic statement.)

http://freethoughtblogs.com/taslima/2014/05/08/allah-says-i-should-sell-he-commands-me-to-sell-i-will-sell-women-i-sell-women/