Kargil “Victory”. Hang The Supreme Commander!

From: Rajput < >

Subject: Kargil “Victory”. Hang The Supreme Commander!

So nice of you to write that important bit about Maneckshaw. How true.

 

I may add another incident in which he showed guts to defy the prime minister, a secret convert to Islam.

 

During war against Pakistan (1971-72) when our troops were advancing rapidly, the Musalmaani Indira (Maimoona Begum) got jittery. She called Maneckshaw and asked him to cease fire to avoid needless carnage of Pakistani soldiers and the Bengali citizens.

 

Maneckshaw was shrewd enough to see through her pro Pakistani orientation and her contempt of our own army that she regarded as mercenaries. He was horrified to hear the words “cease fire” over which he, and his soldiers, had been seething with anger since they were held back by her pro Pakistani father Jawaharlal Nehru in Kashmir.

 

He told her point blank, “Bibi, leave the fighting to me. I am a professional soldier, not a mercenary. My next step will be to blast the “cease-fire” ordered by your father in Kashmir!

 

Indira flew in rage. She asked the Field Marshal to leave at once. Thereafter the ruling establishment never gave him the respect he deserved. Neither the prime minister nor the defense minister attended the funeral of India’s most illustrious and distinguished soldier!

 

In 1947 the armed forces put Nehru above our Akhand Bharat. In 1999 our armed forces put Atal Bihari Vajpayee known for his “bottle” than his “baton” above our Jawans’ lives!

 

rajput

26 Jul 16.

====================

 

In a message dated 7/25/2016 5:53:20 P.M. GMT Daylight Time, .. .. writes:

In contrast to Kargil we know for sure that Field Marshal Manekshaw refused to Indira Gandhi to fight during impending rainy season as well as he wanted the information about attack without loss of his Soldiers. Strategy is must before war. He was ready to resign rather than sacrifice his duty bound soldiers. TRUELY SON OF BHARATMATA.

  1. AMBEKAR

    Sent from my iPhone

On 25 Jul 2016, at 17:27 … …  wrote:

HANG THE SUPREME COMMANDER

MORE ON KARGIL “VICTORY”

 

How the Government of India made sure of MAXIMUM deaths of our own “Jawans”?

The enemy had daringly & surreptitiously come over across the international border, climbed the soaring heights and dug in the effective lethal trap for the Indian troops, catching them by surprise (with “pants down”).

The useless sector commander on the Indian side had not assessed the danger of the enemy approach in that way. The HEIGHTS were also left unoccupied with NO observation post to keep an eye on the surrounding ground. Total lack of professionalism and preparedness!

That itself counts as CRIME. Main Criminals: India’s SUPREME COMMANDER and the DEFENCE MINISTER. Both ought to have been PUT ON TRIAL for negligence of duty and BETRAYAL OF TROOPS in the field and removed from their posts. They neither had the sense of shame and self-respect to resign nor the code of honor to commit suicide like the captain of the sinking ship. They were not dismissed in disgrace or put in prison like Minister Krishna Menon and General Kaul after 1962 DEBACLE.

After the battle began, the Indian troops were ordered to do FRONTAL ATTACKS up the steep hills repeatedly, taking UNNECESSARY casualties in dead and wounded. This is clearly contrary to the most elementary knowledge of the tactics in battle.

The tactics were so FLAWED that many of us wondered if the senior army officers had any brains or training to do mountain warfare. In reality it was not the general but the “big baboo” controlling him from behind.

In a situation like this where the enemy is entrenched on great heights it was simply SUICIDAL to go up the hills, carrying weapons, ammunition and equipment and face the bullets head on, simply to die.

Before sending in the Infantry, the Artillery and the Air Force had to POUND the enemy occupied heights day and night till not even a lizard was left alive. Common sense would dictate the use of AIR FORCE to drop huge bombs on the heights to destroy the trenches and kill the enemy soldiers. We saw how the Americans blasted BAGHDAD from the air before the ground troops went in. The whole sky was lit up with FIRES when the bombs exploded. It is because the American nation and their generals VALUE the lives of soldiers immensely, and never expose them to needless danger. In contrast, for the Indian RULERS soldiers’ life is DIRT CHEAP and they take no time in betraying the armed forces.

There are so many questions left unanswered from the previous defeats and disasters, for example.

Defeat of 1947 when ONE THIRD of India was unconditionally surrendered to the enemy in utmost haste and panic and all claims to recover the territory GIVEN UP in perpetuity. The FOOLS never defined the ENEMY!

No patriot stepped forward to shoot dead JAWAHARLAL NEHRU who said, “I have given Karachi, Quetta, Lahore, Peshawar and Dhaka to your “brothers”. Now CELEBRATE your Independence!” The nation of dwarfs and fools CELEBRATED, and do so on 15 August year in and year out!

If defeat (ENFORCED Partition) is celebrated as victory (“Independence”) then it must confuse the soldiers, too, whether to bother defending an odd hill here and a bridge there.

Why were Artillery, mountain and field guns, not employed to pound the heights and pulverize the enemy positions BEFORE sending in the Jawans to climb the steep hills head on? The defense minister is silent. So is the Supreme Commander. If they are answerable only to the Italian born First Lady, then that is where the matter must end. Why bother to question further?

The alternative step was to circumvent the enemy positions and go behind and then come up FROM THE REAR with a coordinated assault from the front. That, too, was not done. Why not?

Yet another step was to drop the PARATROOPERS at the back and make the enemy run in PANIC, with bullets coming from the rear and the front.

But overlooking the rules of warfare the Indian army did FRONTAL ATTACKS in the manner of 18th and 19th centuries.

Truly, 127 MP’s in Lok Sabha (one for each soldier killed) and the DEFENCE MINISTER had to be tried for treason and hanged to death for those young men in Army uniform killed in that battle!

A Memorial will NOT cover up the Generals’ “cock up”, especially when the Defense Minister was one of the BABOOS who was more suitable to run a corner shop than to conduct a war.

Now let us say it openly to honor the memory of the 127 JAWANS and officers who were killed:

“Those wasted lives were on account of SONIA GANDHI-MAINO who was consulted by the Chief of the Army Staff on the manner of fighting the Pakistanis who were related by blood & ideology to the Dynasty.

The Indian Army has to wait for the day of real victory when KHYBER is re-captured in the footsteps of brave SIKH soldiers.

Finally, let us see what “victory” means and some examples of real victories in recent time.

Victory has two elements. 1.  TERRITORY GAINED; 2.  THE ENEMY IS CRUSHED.

Examples: BOTH WORLD WARS. Let us see the maps of Europe before and after World War 1 and World War 2. In both cases the German WAR MACHINE was completely destroyed. Now look at the so-called “Kargil victory”.

(a) Pakistani forces were pushed back. They were not destroyed.

(b) Pakistan did not sign document of surrender like our India signing the Document of Surrender called “Partition”!

(c) Pakistani war machine remained intact.

(d) Despite deliberately wrong and suicidal tactics used we did manage to get back to the old border. Not an inch of Pakistani TERRITORY was gained. No new maps were printed as in Europe after both World Wars. But India’s leaders can call it Victory and the surrender of Sindh, West Punjab and East Bengal “Independence”.

The capture of East Pakistan and North Kashmir can be regarded real victories. But it was NO victory when we RETURNED the captured territory back to the ENEMY and in North Kashmir we remain stuck “forever”!  (No. Things will / must chane for better. – Skanda987)

TRUTH on the Battle of Kargil is waiting to come out. One day it will.

Total obliteration of the “treacherous HINDU BASHING mongrel” All-India Congress Party will also be known as “victory”. Till then any skirmish or battle where we are surprised by the enemy and recover our own territory, suffering needless casualties, is NO “Victory” worth celebrating!

Indian army since 1947 has been in “array yaar, sab chaltaa hai!” mode, doing the bidding of CORRUPT “baboos & masters” instead of ousting them all from absolute arbitrary powers. The only exception was Field Marshal Maneckshaw who immediately fell afoul of arrogant uncrowned “Empress” Maimoona Begum, the autocratic Prime Minister of Hindusthan.

Now we expect the Government of India to raise two regiments to redeem their honor.

FIRST: GENERAL HARI SINGH NALWA ARMOURED BRIGADE (TO HONOUR THE WARRIOR WHO DEFEATED THE AFGHANS AND CAPTURED KHYBER PASS),

AND SECOND, NETAJI BOSE INFANTRY REGIMENTAL CENTRE. NETAJI ESTABLISHED “AZAD HINDU FAUJ (INDIAN NATIONAL ARMY) IN BURMA TO LIBERATE BHARAT.”

For the world’s fourth largest army a real victory worth celebrating would have been to capture Muzaffargarh and hoist the Indian flag there.

Now let us see what fulfils the two major criteria of victory.

World War 2. Both Germany and Japan surrendered unconditionally and both ceded TERRITORY. Germany ceded Poznan and Breslau in Poland and Konigsberg (now Kaliningrad). Japan ceded four islands: Etorofu, Kunashiri, Shikotan and the Habomai group of islets to the Soviet Union.

The PACIFIST surrendering, appeasing Government of India is also expected to SMASH all the statues of MK GANDHI, the Apostle of Defeat & Disaster, before the PEOPLE rise to do so. Compare Gandhi confronting JINNAH and Sri Rama confronting RAVANA!

rajput

===================

Written and first posted on 12 June 2013 during ‘Congress & Sonia’ rule over Hindusthan.

COMMENTS INVITED.

 ================.

 

Ayodhyaa राम मंदिर और धारा ३७०

From: अयोध्या प्रसाद त्रिपाठी < >

 

नागदा जी को नमस्ते!

 

विषय प्रारम्भ हुआ था, राम मंदिर और धारा ३७० से आप ने पूर्णाहुति की वैज्ञानिकों की हत्या से.

बरगद का वृक्ष कभी सूखता नहीं, तनों से जड़ें निकलती हैं. लेकिन उसका बीज अत्यंत छोटा होता है.

 

अतः पहले राम मंदिर और धारा ३७० पर;

राम मंदिर …

इसका सीधा सम्बन्ध भारतीय संविधान के अनुच्छेद २९(१) से है. जैसा कि आप सभी जानते हैं कि मंदिर बन भी जाये तो भी नहीं रह सकता| उपासना स्थल तोड़ना अब्रह्मी संस्कृतियों का परम धर्म है| (बाइबल, व्यवस्था विवरण १२:१-३, अज़ान व कुरान १७:८१).

 

भारतीय संविधान का अनुच्छेद २९(१) एलिजाबेथ को अपनी ईसाई संस्कृति और हामिद अंसारी को इस्लामी संस्कृति को बनाये रखने का असीमित मौलिक अधिकार देता है| लेकिन हम वैदिक पंथियों को, जो विश्व के अल्पसंख्यकों में अल्पसंख्यक हैं, को अपनी संस्कृति को बनाये रखने का अधिकार न देना प्रेसिडेंट प्रणब दा और राज्यपालों द्वारा लिए गए शपथ व भारतीय संविधान की अवहेलना है| यह अवहेलना तब तक जारी रहेगी, जब तक भारतीय संविधान प्रभावी रहेगा. धारा ३७० हट भी जाये तो भी इस्लाम का संरक्षण, पोषण व संवर्धन जारी रहेगा, यानी कि हिंदुओं के धन, धरती और नारियों पर अब्रह्मी संस्कृतियों का अधिकार बना रहेगा.

 

(Skanda987’s comment: The constitution is not Supreme, the people who made it ( for whom it is made) are Supreme.  Therefore, they—the Vedics—need to amend the constitution, or re-write, to make it pro-Vedic.)

 

अब आता हूँ नौकरशाही के विरुद्ध वेदना पर,

रुडयार्ड किपलिंग जैसे लोगों ने वैदिक सनातन संस्कृति के अनुयायी आदिमों पर शासन करने हेतु “श्वेतों का उत्तरदायित्व” के रूप में एक पुराणरूढ़ दर्शन (मिथ्) ही प्रस्तुत कर लिया है. इंडियन उपनिवेश के तो राष्ट्रगान के अनुसार ही एलिजाबेथ आज भी हम उपनिवेशवासियों की अधिनायक और भाग्य विधाता है.

 

इसी आधार पर “श्वेत पुरुषों के दायित्व” का सिद्धांत विकसित हुआ है। शासितों में आत्मविश्वास का लोप सामान्य बात है। फलत: सर्वमान्य विश्वास की बात ही नहीं उठ सकती। सारा शासन अप्रत्यक्ष रूप से होता रहा है। शासन की भाषा बाहर से आने पर वैज्ञानिक भाषा ‘संस्कृत’ का विकास अवरुद्ध हो गया है। सरकारी पदों पर अल्पसंख्यकों की नियुक्ति का अनुपात असंतुलित किया गया है। शासन की क्रमबद्धता नष्ट होने से जनस्वीकृति, जनमत, हितरक्षा आदि असंभव हैं। विकासहीनता में शासन यथास्थिति बनाए रखना चाहता है और रूढ़िवादिता एवं अनुदार परंपराओं का वह अभिभावक बन गया है।

नमो ने सत्ता के हस्तान्तरण के पुस्तिका पर हस्ताक्षर किये हैं और भारतीय संविधान में आस्था और निष्ठा की शपथ ली है. भारतीय संविधान वैदिक सनातन धर्म को मिटाने का एक फंदा (बूबी ट्रैप Booby trap) है|

बलात्कार का मुद्दा उठाने से पूर्व खतने और कौटुम्बिक व्यभिचार पर एक लिंक देता हूँ, इस पर गौर करिये.

http://www.aryavrt.com/kautumbik-vyabhichar

 

भारतीय संविधान के अनुच्छेद २९(१) और ३९(ग) में संशोधन की क्षमता के पास नहीं है. भारतीय संविधान की व्याख्या अनुच्छेद १४७ के अनुसार गवर्नमेंट ऑफ़ इंडिया एक्ट १९३५ तथा भारतीय स्वतंत्रता अधिनियम १९४७ (Indian independence act 1947) १९४७ के अधीन ही की जा सकती है … दोनों एक्ट ब्रिटिश सरकार ने बनाये व लागू किये हैं.

 

मेल के प्रारम्भ में ही परमाणु वैज्ञानिकों के हत्याओं पर असंतोष प्रगट किया गया है.  सेना देश के सीमाओं की रक्षक है| फिर भी इंडिया में सेना का मनोबल तोड़ने के लिए, १९४७ से ही षड्यंत्र जारी है| क्योकि एलिजाबेथ को वैदिक सनातन संस्कृति मिटाना है. १९४७ में इंडियन सेना पाकिस्तानियों को पराजित कर रही थी| सेना वापस बुला ली गई| सैनिक हथियार और परेड के स्थान पर जूते बनाने लगे| परिणाम १९६२ में चीन के हाथों पराजय के रूप में आया| १९६५ में जीती हुई धरती के साथ हम प्रधानमंत्री लाल बहादुर शास्त्री को गवां बैठे| १९७१ में पाकिस्तान के ९३ हजार युद्ध बंदी छोड़ दिए गए लेकिन इंडिया के लगभग ५० सैनिक वापस नहीं लिये गए| एलिजाबेथ के लिए इतना कुछ करने के बाद इंदिरा और राजीव दोनों मारे गए| कारगिल युद्ध में पाकिस्तानी सैनिकों को वापस जाने दिया गया| अटल विरोध करते तो वे भी मारे जाते| एडमिरल विष्णु भागवत के बाद अब वीके सिंह का नम्बर लगा है| हालात इतने भयानक हैं कि भयंकर बेरोज़गारी के बाद भी कोई नेवी में जाना नहीं चाहता है. मेरे मोबाईल पर प्रतिदिन नेवी में नौकरी करने के लिए विज्ञापन आ रहे हैं.

 

मैं आप लोगों से बारम्बार आग्रह कर रहा हूँ कि लोगों को उपनिवेश का विरोध करने के लिए जागृत कीजिए.

भारतीय स्वतंत्रता (उपनिवेश) अधिनियम, १९४७, का जिसने भी विरोध किया – वह अम्बेडकर सहित जीवित नहीं बचा.

 

चुनाव धोखा है| चुनाव द्वारा मतदाता (Voter) भारतीय संविधान के अनुच्छेद २९(१) व ३९(ग), कुरान और बाइबल के हठधर्म नहीं बदल सकते. आर्यावर्त सरकार जानना चाहती है कि ब्रिटेन के पास इंडिया को २ भागों इंडिया व पाकिस्तान में बाँटने का अधिकार कैसे था? आतताई अब्रह्मी संस्कृतियाँ ईसाइयत और इस्लाम को इंडिया में रहने का अधिकार कैसे है?

 

बलात्कार पर लम्बे चौड़े लेख लिखने का क्या लाभ?

http://www.aryavrt.com/kautumbik-vyabhichar

 

अतः पहले उपनिवेश की दासता से मुक्ति लीजिए.

 

भवदीय:-

अयोध्या प्रसाद त्रिपाठी (सूचना सचिव)

आर्यावर्त सरकार,

७७ खेड़ा खुर्द, दिल्लीः ११० ०८२.

चल दूरभाष: (+९१) ९८६८३२४०२५/९१५२५७९०४१

ईमेल : aryavrt39@gmail.com

ब्लाग: http://aaryavrt.blogspot.com
गणक जाल: http://www.aryavrt.com
पढ़ें: http://www.aryavrt.com/

 

Kashmir Reality: A Letter By Maj Gaurav Arya

From: Col R P Singh < >

“JANNAT” BEING CONVERTED INTO “DOJHAK” – THE REALITY IS THIS

                                                         LETTER FROM KASHMIR
                                                             By Maj Gaurav Arya

The response to my Facebook post “Open Letter to Burhan Wani” has been overwhelming. I received responses from all over the world. And Kashmir.

There were the usual threats of violence, many accused me of glorifying the armed forces and some shared horrifying stories of human rights abuses. Interestingly, there were some very intelligent and well thought through opinions and voices from Kashmir, who while condemning the violence by state agencies, also condemned the violence perpetrated by the Hurriyat and local leaders, including militants.

These young men and women spoke about conflict fatigue and posttraumatic stress of having to spend an entire life in an operational zone. I can only imagine.

I also received letters from the rest of India, some extremely unflattering. Many left leaning opinions pointed out that the Indian Army was an occupation force and was murdering Kashmiris. Karl Marx was dragged out of his grave and made to bear witness.

The vast majority of Indians have been absolutely supportive. Thank you, from the bottom of my heart.

I wish to share my point of view and in many ways, it is the view of many brother officers of the Indian Army. What I am writing is NOT the official Indian Army line. This is just what many faujis think privately.

It is important for young Kashmiris to know what we think, too. Communication needs to be both ways.

The army is a blunt instrument. Think of it as a broadsword, not a scalpel. It functions on the basic premise of massive disproportionate force. We do not particularly enjoy laying a cordon at 0300 hrs and doing a house-to-house search. It gives us absolutely no pleasure to search cars of civilians or do public pat downs. The army is an armed force of the union and is trained in defense and attack, amongst a million other things. We would rather train, defend the borders and fight wars. Dealing with civilians in the counter insurgency grid is a pain.

Then why is the army there in Kashmir? Well, the answer is fairly simple. The militant dimensions of the entire Kashmir problem are artificially manufactured by Pakistan and its “deep state” agencies. The Kashmir issue was and remains primarily a political problem, but Pakistan has left no stone unturned in making it a military flashpoint. Four wars and two insurgencies have proved beyond doubt that Pakistan is militarily inferior to India. In 1971, they lost half their country. In the next 20 years, they are likely to lose 44% of their landmass. I am referring specifically to Balochistan.

I am sure you would have heard of Pakistan’s Don Quixote-like obsession with strategic depth. That is why Punjab burned when the masters of strategy at Rawalpindi launched the Khalistan movement. And that is why Kashmir still burns. Pakistan is geographically narrow. Too narrow to sustain a lightning armour thrust through Punjab, onwards to Lahore. And too narrow to sustain an infantry assault through Muzzafarabad (Pakistan Occupied Kashmir). Hence, the need to create artificial depth so that our fifth columns within India bog down our own forces during war.

You, my Kashmiri brothers and sisters, are part of the strategic depth plan of the Pakistan Army. Pakistan went about this plan in a systematic manner. In the late eighties they introduced armed militancy in Kashmir. Young men were taken to Pakistan to be trained and were then sent back into India. That was not a resounding success because Kashmiris did not fight with the ruthless abandon of the Afghans and they still thought of the Kashmir issue as a political dispute. Look at the history of Pakistan. The army has resolved all political disputes. They do that by simply sending the 111 Brigade stationed at Islamabad to take over the country. Yes, they have a dedicated Infantry Brigade just for this.

As a next step, Pakistan sent in Afghan and Punjabi fighters into Kashmir. These were battle-hardened warriors who had fought the Soviet army during the Afghan jihad and who were unemployed, staying in putrid refugee camps in Peshawar or in non-descript towns of South Punjab (Pakistan).

And into this toxic mix Pakistan introduced Islam. Not the gentle Sufi Islam of Kashmir, but the Wahhabi Islam of Saudi Arabia. Those fighting against the Indian Army became Mujahideen (holy warriors) and the fight itself became Jihad (holy war).

A lot of images have been circulated on social media by a few Kashmiris, which have shocked Indians. Images of kids being shot with pellet guns and women being manhandled. These images are not the complete truth. They are meant to convey a message to Indians and tell them, “Look at your forces. They are murdering Kashmiris and killing innocent children”.

Let me tell you the truth.

These protestors and stone throwers never target a large cantonment or large presence of security forces. They pick a BSF or CRPF picket, which may have ten to 15 people or more. Then they get a mob of hundreds of people to surround the picket and start pelting stones. Women and children are placed in front. As the mob advances, the pressure inside the picket grows. Firing starts and in the smoke, sound, pressure and confusion a bullet or rubber pellet hits a child, because the child is placed right in front of the soldiers. The child dies. (see attached picture)

Why would a mob deliberately take a 5-year-old child to throw stones at a security force picket? Why would they place women in front when the firing starts? Because the dead body of a child makes for a perfect photo op for the Hurriyat leaders and adds fuel to the fire. The Hurriyat is not responsible for law and order, development, roads and electricity, education or any of those things that “leaders” are supposed to do all over the world. They accept money from Pakistan’s ISI to formant trouble in Kashmir. That’s all they do.

With all the moral authority at my disposal, I wish to tell my countrymen one thing – a soldier is also a father and a son. No soldier deliberately shoots at a child. And in the rare case that there is a bad apple amongst us, the Army Act ensures immediate, severe and deliberate action.  Hundreds of cases have been disposed off in typical army fashion – “fast and ruthless”. We are not only a powerful army. We are a moral army.

Why do the security forces use rubber pellets to disperse crowds? Why do the “bloodthirsty security forces” not use real bullets? Because the intent is to stop, not kill. Do you really think that Kashmiris would have been out on the road throwing stones if they knew that the BSF had 3 mounted Light Machine Guns in the alley? I think not.

Most of the stone throwers are not political activists. They are daily wage laborers who are paid to do this work.

The Hurriyat is a sickness typical to Kashmir. They do politics on the dead body of children. How are they different from ISIS?

Who funds the lavish lifestyle of the Hurriyat leaders? Who buys the convoys ofSUVs and who pays their office bearers? What is the source of funds of the Hurriyat? Who has elected them? Once you have the answers, you will understand why the Indian Army is involved. And that is why the military solution to the Kashmir problem (otherwise political) lies in Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

Someone from Kashmir wrote a response to my article and mentioned about how he was slapped by the security forces when he was just ten. This is condemnable and in the strongest possible terms. My article was about Burhan Wani only, and not about security forces violations. And if every ten year old who is slapped, picks up a gun, we are going to have a lot of dead 23 year olds.

Kashmir’s “azaadi” sponsors, Pakistan, have very low international credibility. By extension, the so-called Kashmir issue has very low international credibility. Think about it for a while. The primary (and only) supporter of Kashmir’s secession from India is a nuclear proliferator, a global leader in exporting terrorism and an international migraine. All these fine words from Pakistan’s chief ally in the war on terror, the US of A.

Pakistan wants a referendum in Kashmir. If it weren’t so tragic, it would have been funny. A country that has murdered three of its elected prime ministers (I am including Benazir Bhutto here), had four military coups and recently celebrated its first democratic transfer of power in 70 years (because most of the earlier prime ministers were killed, exiled or both) has a view on democracy and referendum.

Think of Pakistan as an Urdu speaking North Korea.

Are Kashmiris really so naïve as to believe that IF Kashmir achieves this so-called “azaadi”, Pakistan will quietly step back and allow Kashmir to be independent? Has Pakistan crushed the aspirations of Punjabis, Sindhis, Baluchis, Pashtun, Hazaras and other citizens of Pakistan for 70 years so that Kashmiris can walk into the sunset with music playing in the background? No Sir. For Pakistan,this is the biggest property deal in living memory For them Kashmiris be damned.

The primary solution of the Kashmir issue is political. The day Kashmiris try to find salvation within the pages of the Constitution of India, they will find true “azaadi”. Over 1.2 billion Indians find solace in those pages, and so will the Kashmiris.

Burhan Wani’s successor has a code name – Mehmood Ghaznavi. They could have named him Changez Khan and he would still have a remarkably short shelf life. A 7.62 mm full metal jacket round does not respect fancy historical names. The 7.9 g (122 gr) projectile flies at 2350 feet per second and destroys whatever it comes into contact with. Mehmood Ghaznavi, the moment you were declared successor, you were a dead man. They have started hunting you. They will kill you. Soon.

Major Gaurav Arya (Veteran)

हिन्दू तीर्थ यात्रियों का उत्पीड़न…..जलता कश्मीर….

From: Vinod Kumar Gupta < >

हिन्दू तीर्थ यात्रियों का उत्पीड़न…..जलता कश्मीर….

महोदय/महोदया

➖यह बहुत खेदजनक है कि कुख्यात आतंकी बुरहान की मौत का बहाना लेकर घाटी को जिस प्रकार से रक्तरंजित करके व हिंदुओं को खुलेआम भारतीय काफ़िर कह कर उनको अमरनाथ जी की यात्रा के प्रति मौत का भय बना कर रोका जा रहा है ।

➖क्या महबूबा सरकार ने ईद से पहले  लगभग 650 पत्थरबाजो को इसीलिये छोड़ा था कि वे हिन्दू धर्मावलंबियों को अमरनाथ यात्रा में विध्न डाल कर उनको उत्पीड़ित करें ?

➖ध्यान रहें महबूबा मुफ़्ती के पिताजी मुफ़्ती मोहम्मद सईद भी आतंकियों के प्रति निरंतर नम्र रहते रहें और पूर्व में अपने कार्यकाल में भी कश्मीरी अलगाववादियों व आतंकवादियों को अनेक प्रकार से सहयोग करके उनके आपराधिक विवादों को लौटाया गया , सरकारी नौकरियां दी गयी और पुनर्वास नीति के अन्तर्गत करोडो रुपयो की सहायता भी की गयी थी।

➖यही सिलसिला उमर अब्दुल्ला की पिछली सरकार में भी चलता रहा।पिछले 10-15 वर्षो में लगभग दस हज़ार से अधिक ऐसे आतंकियों व अलगाववादियों को पुनर्वास नीति का लाभ भी मिला और आपराधिक मुकदमे से भी बचे।उनमें से न जाने आज कितने  पुनःसक्रिय हो गये होंगे और नए नए युवाओ को आगे करके अपने लक्ष्य को साधने में लगे होंगे ,बुरहान वानी …भी उनमे से एक हो तो कोई आश्चर्य नहीं।

➖ढुलमुल नीतियों से राष्ट्र सुरक्षित नहीं रह सकते ।शासन को देशद्रोहियों के प्रति कठोर तो होना ही होगा, जैसे चीन में दंगाइयों को सरकारी गोलियों का शिकार होना पड़ता है, तभी वहां दंगा व  देशद्रोही प्रदर्शन नियन्त्रित हो पाते है। राष्ट्र की सुरक्षा सरकार का सर्वोच्च दायित्व होता है।
➖कश्मीर की जनता यह क्यों नहीं सोचती कि उनको देश में आम जनता के मुकाबले दस गुना अधिक प्रति व्यक्ति जो सहायता मिल रही है वह उन्ही हिन्दुओ. के द्वारा दिए गए राजस्व से एकत्रित कोष से ही मिलती है जिनको ये कट्टरपंथी “काफिर” कहते है ?

➖ उनको केन्द्रीय सरकार की सहायता से होने वाली हज़ यात्रा व अन्य अल्पसंख्यक योजनाओं का जो लाभ मिलता है वह भी उन्ही काफ़िर हिंदुओं के राजस्व से एकत्रित हुए कोष से ही मिलता है जिनसे ये जिहाद करके जन्नत पाना चाहते है।

➖आज कल जिस प्रकार से कश्मीर घाटी में हिन्दू तीर्थ यात्रियों के उत्पीड़न के समाचार आ रहें है उससे ऐसा आभास हो रहा है कि आलगाववादियों , आतंकवादियो व पाकिस्तान की आई. एस. आई. एवम लश्करे-तोइबा आदि आतंकी संगठन हमारी सरकार की कमजोर व समझौता वादी नीतियों का अनुचित  लाभ उठा कर घाटी में निज़ामे-मुस्तफा की स्थापना के लिए अधिक कटिबद्ध हो रहे है।

➖जब तक चीन के समान कोई ठोस व आक्रामक नीति नहीं बनेगी और आतंक के धर्म का बुर्का नहीं हटेगा तब तक कट्टरपंथी जिहादियों को नियंत्रित नहीं किया जा सकता।

➖इसके लिए सेना व पुलिस को भी तत्काल आवश्यक कार्यवाही करने के निर्देश देने होंगे ।अब सुरक्षाबलों को छदम धर्मनिरपेक्षता व मानवाधिकार  के नाम पर अनियंत्रित जिहादियों के सामने आत्मघात सहने को विवश करना बंद करना होगा।

➖अतः केन्द्र व राज्य की सरकारो को राष्ट्रीय अखंडता के लिए इन देशद्रोही शक्तियों के विरुद्ध आक्रामक नीतियों का सहारा लेना होगा नहीं तो 1990 की काल अवधि से भी अधिक भयानक परिणाम हो सकते है । यह अब देश की केंद्रीय सरकार के लिए एक बड़ी चुनौती है क्योंकि राज्य  सरकार तो प्रायः अप्रत्यक्ष रुप से इन षड्यंत्रकारियों के सामने बेबस ही रहती है।

विनोद कुमार सर्वोदय

A Way to Stop Mosque / Madrassa Construction

From: Chander Kohli < >

A Way to Stop Mosque / Madrassa Construction

The Spaniards’ Brilliant Idea!!

PEOPLE IN India, UK , USA and AUSTRALIA

NEED TO TAKE A LESSON FROM THIS.

In Sevilla Spain, local people found a way to stop the construction of another mosque in their town. They buried a pig on the site and made sure this would be known by the local press.

The Islamic rules forbid the erecting of a Mosque on “pig soiled ground.” The Muslims had to cancel the project.

This land was sold to them by government officials.

No protests were needed by the local people….and it worked!

 

Chilcot Enquiry and 1947 Partition of India

From: Rajput < >

To:

Rt. Hon’ble Mr. David Cameron, MP

Prime Minister of the United Kingdom

10 Downing Street, London, UK

Subject: Chilcot Enquiry and Partition of India

 

Dear Prime Minister,

The enquiry by Sir John Chilcot into the causes and repercussions of the Iraq war, bring home with great clarity the need of another such enquiry into granting freedom to India in 1947. There are important similarities with Partition of India, for example-

  1. The military action in Iraq was launched without duly considering the other options.
  2. There was incorrect Intelligence about Saddam Hussain’s weapons of mass destruction and about his intentions.
  3. The aftermath of the invasion was not thought through in depth.
  4. Effects on social harmony were overlooked.
  5. The destruction and economic ruin of the country were not foreseen.
  6. The loss of human lives was not properly assessed.
  7. Absurdity of Partitioning India.

I wish to take up these points in the same sequence as they impacted on India in 1947 when Britain was ruling the country.

  1. Partition was declared without any regard to, or consideration of, all other options open. It was imposed on India with undignified haste and thoughtlessness.
  2. There was incorrect Intelligence about the likelihood of civil war or revolt by the apparently “infuriated” Muslim bullies. During all the previous long centuries, even during the British rule, there was never any sign of Muslim separatism or rebellion against the Hindus, the natives of the land who happen to be the majority in population, too. Most Muslims living across India at that time would have rejected Partition had a Referendum been held.

Muslim leaders like Sir Sayed Ahmed Khan and Poet Laureate Sir Mohammed Iqbal used to sing praises of Hindustan (India). I quote a verse by Sir Mohammed, “Saare Jehan se achcha…,” (Our Hindustan is the best country on earth. We are the nightingales and it is our garden!”)

But such sentiment of fraternity was indirectly destroyed by the British rulers who encouraged Barrister Mohammed Ali Jinnah, earlier President of All-India Congress Party, to which both Mr. Gandhi and Pandit Nehru belonged, in his separatist (treasonous) aspirations!

It is common knowledge that Jinnah’s sudden passion for separatism was not only tolerated, but openly encouraged by the British rulers enjoying absolute power over the colony.

There was incorrect Intelligence about the real commitment to Pakistan by the Indian Muslims. No poll was taken among them and the Muslim League governments in one or two provinces had not contested the elections with Partition in their manifesto!

In fact, in one Muslim majority province, North West Frontier Province (NWFP), the vast majority of Muslims were opposed to the creation of Pakistan. But they were sidelined by the British and completely ignored by Mr. Jinnah, the leader of the campaign for a separate homeland exclusively for the Indian Muslims to be carved out within the Indian borders.

Thus the British Intelligence about the break out of a devastating civil war between the Hindus and the Muslims was totally erroneous and faulty.

Life would have returned to normal after a couple of seditious leaders were arrested and sent to jail, and warning issued to the few other trouble makers to follow the secular law of land.

  1. The aftermath of that ill-conceived, ill-founded “bogus” and sectarian “partition” of the sub-continent, without referendum, without a single condition, was not thought through properly. Anyone with some knowledge of Indian history and love of humanity could have foreseen the consequences of creating new ideological fault lines where none existed before.
  2. The disastrous effect on social harmony: People who had lived side by side as neighbors now became enemies and turned on each other.

(a) The Sikhs:

People of India were not divided into separate compartments. The Sikhs lived in harmony with the others. But they bore the brunt of Partition, losing their heartland in West Punjab with Lahore, the former capital of the powerful Sikh Kingdom under Maharaja Ramjet Singh that extended to Khyber Pass and included Jammu & Kashmir, the holy city of Nankana Sahib, the birthplace of Guru Nanak, the founder of Sikh Faith, the educational and cultural center Gujranwala, the birthplace of Maharaja Ranjit Singh, and, finally, the district of Lyallpur with its prosperous Sikh farmers who had transformed the marshes into lush green farmlands due to their diligence and hard work, were all surrendered without taking the Sikh interests into consideration, or considering their well-being, even safety, into account.

In the event the small but hard working and affluent Sikh community, that valiantly fought in the battles against the Afghans in NWFP, earning high praises by Winston Churchill, then a subaltern, and in all the theatres of World Wars 1 and 2, winning several Victoria Crosses for courage and gallantry, was totally wiped out in West Punjab in 1947.

The betrayal of Sikhs at Partition was a historic crime by the then Labor Government of the United Kingdom. One does not forsake or let down a brave community like this!

(b)  The Muslims:

Those who were allowed, even “encouraged”, to demand a separate homeland for the Muslims (Pakistan) should have been made to realize the disastrous results for them and their Pakistan in the long run.

The thrill & joy of killing the “Infidels”, abducting and raping Hindu and Sikh girls, the rush to grab lands, farms and houses vacated by the Hindus and Sikhs and the gold and silver buried in their homes, soon turned into despair by doubt and confusion when Jinnah suddenly died of tuberculosis, lung cancer and pneumonia on 11 September 1948.

He had been the ideological brain behind the idea of Pakistan.  None of the others was sure as to why he had got away with High Treason so lightly!

The second blow to the newly established fundamentalist Islamic State came with the assassination of Mr. Liaqat Ali Khan, the first prime minister of Pakistan in Rawalpindi on 16 October 1951. That event was followed by long terms of successive military dictatorships when, instead of democracy, the people of Pakistan were “driven” by “gun and whip” by their military rulers.

Pakistan was in turmoil again when prime minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, the founder of “Pakistan People’s Party” (PPP), was hanged to death on 4 April 1979 under the orders of Gen Zia-ul-Haq, the military dictator.

The last traumatic assassination was that of the popular prime minister, Benazir Bhutto, the 11th and 13th Prime Minister of Pakistan, on 27 December, 2007.

The civil war in Pakistan that resulted in East Pakistan, now Bangladesh, going her own separate way, caused much suffering to the people, main brunt being borne by the Hindus who were especially targeted by the Pakistani army and the local fundamentalist Muslims. The plight of Hindus in Bangladesh still remains pathetic with no guarantee of safety.

Today Pakistan is a lawless land whose citizens have carried out murderous attacks both in America, the United Kingdom and India. Some have even travelled to Syria to fight for the brutal “Islamic State” there. The United States has declared Pakistan a “terrorist state”!

There can be no doubt that all the Muslims in the sub-continent would have been living peacefully, enjoying their life in peace and harmony like everyone else, had there been no Partition.

Finally, we look at the Muslims who did not migrate to Pakistan in 1947. They can never be accepted by their Hindu neighbors as equals, or trusted, after they stabbed the country in the back with a dagger.

Our British rulers had to visualize the tensions and the sense of insecurity among the Muslims of the sub-continent who find themselves divided into three segments, living in three different countries though they share common history, traditions, customs and religion. Their natural aspirations to re-unite and live together as they had done in India until 1947, ought NOT to have been ignored or underestimated by the then Labor Government under Mr. Clement Attlee.

(c)  The State of Jammu & Kashmir

Partition also meant the most devastating blow to this beautiful State known as the “Switzerland of Asia”. Its peace was shattered on 22 October 1947 when Pakistani army and irregulars suddenly invaded the State, looting, killing and raping as they moved towards the capital Srinagar.  It was the first of the four Indo-Pakistan Wars fought between the two newly independent nations as a direct result of Partition.

(d)  The Hindus

Partition was a lethal blow to the original inhabitants of the land known for centuries as “Hindus,” the inhabitants of Hindustan (India). India’s fate was sealed by a couple of natives who were pushed for a quick decision by the Viceroy who himself was in a hurry to leave India.

The fate of the ancient land, a sub-continent, was decided within days! Even to buy a pair of shoes one has to pay the price. What price was paid to India for her FIVE provinces that went to fundamentalist Islam “for a song”? Wasn’t it the height of “indecency and vulgarity” shown by Mr. Attlee and his cabinet in London when absolutely no thought was given to the safety of the Hindus in West Pakistan and the dignity of their girls and women in East Pakistan? Furthermore, the great distance between the two parts of Pakistan meant that civil war, or war with India, was inevitable. What happened to British statesmanship then?

India is the land of origin of the Hindu religion, which is universal for manakind. It is where all their saints, holy men and women, and their role model God’s incarnations like Sri Krishna and Sri Rama were born, lived and preached.

In addition, all the Sikh Gurus, too, were born there. Thus India was repository of all the Hindu/ Sikh /Buddhist/ Jain scriptures, their ancient temples and ruins. All Faiths that originated in India have the same core message of “oneness of mankind and love and respect to all the living beings including the animals.”

Accordingly, the Hindus have been most tolerant of all Faiths, including Islam, Christianity and Judaism that came from the Middle East. Hence there was no justification whatsoever to break up such a model of multi-culture and multi-ethnicity as provided by India.

The Hindus regard Bharat (India) their most sacred and revered “motherland” and wish her well by praying for her prosperity and victory over evil. The current prime minister of India ends all his speeches with the call, “Bharat Mata Ki Jaya!” (literally, “Victory to Mother India”!).

At the so-called “Independence” talks that soon degenerated into “Partition talks” the Muslims were given a special seat while the Hindus were shunned since the All-India Congress Party of Jawaharlal Nehru and Mr. M K Gandhi had claimed to represent all the people of India, including the Hindus!

But while agreeing to the demand for Pakistan by the All-India Muslim League, the Hindus were “kicked in the teeth” and forced to give up one third of India to the Muslims! There could not have been worse betrayal of the Hindus by Mr. Attlee’s government!

In view of the above, Partition of India was in reality “unconditional surrender” of secular India to the fundamentalist Muslims- all supervised and approved by Mr. Attlee and his government.

The question is, “Was Partition necessary?” Only Mr. Attlee, the Labor Prime Minister could give the answer! He badly tarnished the image of this country in the minds of one billion Hindus living in the world since there are no two opinions among them when it comes to respecting the territorial integrity of India. Mr. Attlee ought to be regarded a criminal who destroyed India and caused grave offence to the Hindus besides the massacres and uprooting of tens of millions of innocent citizens with bitter memories to last till the end of time.

  1. The destruction and economic ruin of the country were not foreseen.

Partition created two mutually hostile countries out of one whole. British rulers were expected to foresee that enabling the Muslims to capture such large territories without any price, condition or guarantee, was bound to encourage the Muslims to continue with their “anti-Infidel Jihad” in order to subjugate the rest of India, too. It ought to have been obvious that after such a bitter and acrimonious “divorce” the two communities could not live amicably and peacefully side by side. Why did Mr. Attlee and his government agree to, and approve of, this ludicrous and absurd ”divorce”?

All the wars between the two countries have cost billions upon billions of pounds (trillions of rupees) on armaments and weapons of mass destruction since both Pakistan and India have nuclear arsenal now, each regarding the other as primary target.

Thousands of soldiers have lost their lives in these wars and due to the ongoing terrorism and incursions from across the border since 1947. There seems to be no end to this “war of attrition”.

The astronomical amount of money spent by these two poor developing countries on armaments and wars would have provided clean water, better schools and hospitals, clean streets and better roads.

  1. The loss of human lives was not properly assessed.

A rough estimate puts the number of people massacred in just two years, 1946 and 1947, over two million. This resulted in creating millions of widows and orphans who were condemned to start their lives afresh, and re-live the shock and trauma of violence for the rest of their lives.

Violence that accompanied Partition has no parallel in history. The photograph (below) is from ONE town. Similar scenes were repeated in over a hundred towns, cities and villages across West Punjab in that year. And photos alone do not tell us about the proud Sikh fathers who killed their own daughters minutes before being murdered by the frenzied surrounding mobs, nor do these show the trains arriving at Amritsar railway station with not one passenger alive but all mutilated- their blood flowing out of doors, nor, indeed, the families “roasted alive” to death in Multan and Lahore, when the mobs set fire to their homes and hacked to death anyone who ran out to escape the fire, and nor, indeed, the girls and women, stripped of all clothing, and then marched through the towns surrounded by howling & jeering mobs that brought total discredit to them and their Faith.

Similar carnage took place in several towns and villages across West Punjab. The photograph shows the mutilated and charred bodies of the once happy residents, lying in the street.

Nearly 15 million people were forced out of their homes in panic and fear, leaving everything behind. Banks were looted or set on fire, destroying all records. Rich and wealthy people became penniless overnight.

  1. Absurdity of partitioning India.

The new borders did not follow any natural features like hills or rivers. They ripped through the towns and cities that had existed without borders for centuries. The only criterion was MUSLIMS on one side and THE REST on the other. It is beyond belief that Britain, a democratic, secular and tolerant country could apply the crudest medieval yardstick of Dark Ages to cut & chop through the Indian countryside, separating the Muslims from the Rest and split and separated people like the residents of East and West Berlin during cold war in Europe.

I pray that Her Majesty’s government set up a similar Enquiry as the one conducted by Sir John Chilcot to look at all sides of Partition of India in order to establish the criminal act committed by Mr. Attlee and his Government in breaking up India instead of upholding her secular tradition and tolerant system of government that had existed prior to the illogical and ruinous break up of India.

The Enquiry should ascertain the responsibility of the British government under Mr. Attlee and recommend compensation to the survivors of those massacres that occurred in the power vacuum created by Mr Attlee’s criminal decision.

Someone equally bold, objective, impartial and fair as Sir John ought to be appointed to conduct the enquiry into the illogical and sectarian break up of India in 1947

Yours faithfully,

Sd. & dated: ……………….

……………………

10 July 2016

 

 

A response to a Muslim doctor’s complaint!

From: Asha < >

 

A response to a Muslim doctor’s complaint!

 

A Pilot’s response to a Muslim doctor’s complaint! Very well said and worth reading!

This is, unfortunately true for most of us.

 

Read to the bottom, there also are a Canadian, British and Australian response.

 

To me it makes a lot of sense, and would make for a better understanding between the different faiths.

 

Please share with your Muslim friends!

 

No name calling, no hatred, no political agenda.

 

CANADIAN COMMENT APPEARS AT THE END OF THE ARTICLE AND IS MEANINGFUL. THERE IS ALSO SOME RECENTLY ADDED BRITISH COMMENT.

 

This pilot hit the nail right on the head in his open letter.

 

A newspaper stated that some Muslim doctor is saying we are profiling him because he has been checked three times while getting on an airplane.  The following is a letter from a pilot.  This well – spoken man, who is a pilot with American Airlines, says what is in his heart, beautifully.

 

YOU WORRY ME!

By Captain John Maniscalco, American Airlines Pilot

 

I’ve been trying to say this since 911, but you worry me.  I wish you didn’t.  I wish when I walked down the streets of this country that I love, that your color and culture still blended with the beautiful human landscape we enjoy in this country.  But you don’t blend in anymore.  I notice you, and it worries me.

 

I notice you because I can’t help it anymore.  People from your homelands, professing to be Muslims, have been attacking and killing my fellow citizens and our friends for more than 20 years now.

 

I don’t fully understand their grievances and hate, but I know that nothing can justify the inhumanity of their attacks.

 

On September 11, ARAB-MUSLIMS hijacked four jetliners in my country.  They cut the throats of women in front of children and brutally stabbed to death others, hacking their necks, over and over, with box cutters.  They took control of those planes and crashed them into buildings, killing thousands of proud fathers, loving sons, wise grandparents, elegant daughters, best friends, favorite coaches, fearless public servants, and children’s mothers.

 

The Palestinians celebrated, the Iraqis were overjoyed as was most of the Arab world.  So, I notice you now. I don’t want to be worried.

 

I don’t want to be consumed by the same rage, hate and prejudice that has destroyed the soul of these terrorists.  But I need your help.  As a rational American, trying to protect my country and family in an irrational and unsafe world, I must know how to tell the difference between you, and the Arab/Muslim terrorist.

 

How do I differentiate between the true Arab/Muslim Americans and the Arab/Muslim terrorists in our communities who are attending our schools, enjoying our parks, and living in OUR communities under the protection of OUR constitution, while they plot the next attack that will slaughter MORE of the same good neighbors and children?

 

The events of September 11 changed the answer.  .. It is not MY responsibility to determine which of you embraces our great country, with ALL of its religions, with ALL of its different citizens, with all of its faults.  It is time for every Arab/Muslim in this country to determine it for me.

 

I want to know, I DEMAND to know and I have a right to know, whether or not you love America …..  Do you pledge allegiance to its flag?  Do you proudly display it in front of your house, or on your car?  Do you pray in your many daily prayers that Allah will bless this nation; that He will protect it and let it prosper?  Or do you pray that Allah will destroy it in one of your Jihads?  Are you thankful for the freedom that this nation affords?  A freedom that was paid for by the blood of hundreds of thousands of patriots, who have through our history, given their lives for this country?  Are you willing to preserve this freedom by also paying the ultimate sacrifice?  Do you love America??  If this is your commitment, then I need YOU to start letting ME know about it.

 

Your Muslim leaders in this nation should be flooding the media at this time with hard facts on your faith, and what hard actions YOU are taking as a community and as a religion to protect the United States of America.  Please, no more benign overtures of regret for the death of the innocent, because I worry about who you regard as innocent.  No more benign overtures of condemnation for the unprovoked attacks, because I worry about what is unprovoked to you. I am not interested in any more sympathy; I am interested only in action.  What will you do for America – our great country – at this time of continuing crisis, at this time of war?

 

I want to see Arab-Muslims waving the AMERICAN flag in the streets.  I want to hear you chanting ‘Allah Bless America’.  I want to see young Arab/Muslim men enlisting in the military.  I want to see a commitment of money, time and emotion to the victims of this butchering and to our returning wounded and to this nation as a whole.

 

The FBI has had a long list of people they’ve wanted to interact with regarding the threats that they believe to be ongoing. Many of these people live and socialize right now in Muslim communities.  You know them.  You know where they are.  Give the FBI a heads up as to where they may be.  Better yet, hand them over to us, NOW!  But I have seen little even approaching this sort of action.  Instead I have seen an already closed and secretive community close even tighter.  You have disappeared from the streets.  You have posted armed security guards at your facilities.  You have threatened lawsuits.  You have screamed for protection from reprisals.

 

The very few Arab/Muslim representatives, like CARE, that HAVE appeared in the media were defensive and equivocating.  They seemed more concerned with making sure that the United States apologize and take responsibility for actions defending our own people.  They seemed more concerned with protecting their fellow Muslims from violence directed towards them in the United States and abroad than they did with supporting our country and denouncing ‘leaders’ like the late Khadafi, the late Hussein, Farrakhan, and the late Arafat.

 

If the true teachings of Islam proclaim tolerance and peace and love for all people, then I want chapter and verse from the Koran and statements from popular Muslim leaders to back it up.  What good is it if the teachings in the Koran are good, pure, and true, when your ‘leaders’ ARE teaching fanatical interpretations, terrorism, and intolerance?  It matters little how good Islam SHOULD BE if huge numbers of the world’s Muslims interpret the teachings of Mohammed incorrectly and adhere to a degenerative form of the religion.  A form that has been demonstrated to us over and over again.  A form whose structure is built upon a foundation of violence, death, and suicide.  A form whose members are recruited from the prisons around the world.

 

A form whose members (some as young as five years old) are seen day after day, week in and week out, year after year, marching in the streets around the world, burning effigies of our presidents, burning the American flag, shooting weapons into the air.  A form whose members convert from a peaceful religion, only to take up arms against the great United States of America, the country of their birth.  A form whose rules are so twisted, that their traveling members refuse to show their faces at airport security checkpoints, in the name of Islam.

 

We will NEVER allow the attacks of September 11, or any others for that matter, to take away that which is so precious to us — our rights under the greatest constitution in the world.  I want to know where every Arab Muslim in this country stands and I think it is my right and the right of every true citizen of this country to DEMAND it.  A right paid for by the blood of thousands of my brothers and sisters who died protecting the very constitution that is protecting you and your family.

 

I am pleading with you to let me know.  I want you here as my brother, my neighbor, my friend, as a fellow American…… But there can be no grey areas or ambivalence regarding your allegiance, and it is up to YOU, to show ME, where YOU stand.  Until then, “YOU WORRY ME!”

 

A CANADIAN COMMENTS:

 

I totally agree with this sentiment.  I hope you will forget all about the ‘political correctness’ mandate we’ve had rammed down our throats by so many on the left, and see if this doesn’t ring true in your heart and mind.  For Canada, with all the multiculturalism we’ve been told is so important…. why should we not, as Canadians, expect that the millions of new people immigrating to our country will show their love for our country, their allegiance to our country, their willingness to obey the laws of our country, and acceptance that we are a Christian country?  Just because they are able to enjoy exercising their own religion, they should NOT expect us to be ashamed of ours.  They knew Canada was a Christian country when they came here.  Why are we erasing Christianity because immigrants who are unwilling to adopt our way of life expect us to?  There is just too much insanity in the world, and we have to start taking a stand.

 

I hope you will forward this, so that others will feel they are not alone if they are starting to feel the same.

 

A BRITISH COMMENTS:  At last a clear non-racist example of the concerns that the vast majority of our Nations population probably share.  The pilot’s letter encapsulates all that is fair and just about national pride and protection of one’s national culture.  I fear it may be too late here in UK, BUT we too want our country back in the form that attracted all these different cultures to come here in the first place!!  In all our conversations with a wide range of friends and acquaintances we have not met one that disagrees with our own views.

 

If only we all had the courage of our convictions to pass this on, it is a statement that should be accepted as the heart-felt feelings of someone with honest commendable national pride.

 

Not all Muslims are terrorists but almost all terrorists to date have been Muslims.  Stand up and be counted!

 

Australian Comment:   Best email I have had in years it needs to be in every paper every day until we get some answers.  We need all be very concerned, note the pattern in Australia is the same for the other countries above.  Where are the believers of Islam in our beloved country standing up and being counted in all these issues?

 

I have not seen one!

 

This is too good to just read and delete! Let’s saturate New Zealand, Australia, UK, Europe, USA, Canada and the rest of the free world with this one!  Send it!

I say, “If you are not with us then stay in Your birth country!”

 

। मुसलमानो कि संख्या बढने से क्या होता है वो जानो।

From: Vinod Kumar Gupta < >:

। मुसलमानो कि संख्या बढने से क्या होता है वो जानो।

मुस्लिम  पोपुलेशन- –जब तक मुस्लिमों की जनसंख्या किसी देश/प्रदेश/क्षेत्र में लगभग 2% के आसपास होती है, तब वे एकदम शांतिप्रिय, कानूनपसन्द अल्पसंख्यक बनकर रहते हैं और किसी को विशेष शिकायत का मौका नहीं देते, जैसे कि..

अमेरिका – मुस्लिम 0.6%

ऑस्ट्रेलिया – मुस्लिम 1.5%

कनाडा – मुस्लिम 1.9%

चीन – मुस्लिम 1.8%

इटली – मुस्लिम 1.5%

नॉर्वे – मुस्लिम 1.8%

जब मुस्लिम जनसंख्या 2% से 5% के बीच तक पहुँच जाती है, तब वे अन्य धर्मावलम्बियों में अपना “धर्मप्रचार” शुरु कर देते हैं, जिनमें अक्सर समाज का निचला तबका और अन्य धर्मों से असंतुष्ट हुए लोग होते हैं, जैसे कि –

डेनमार्क – मुस्लिम 2%

जर्मनी – मुस्लिम 3.7%

ब्रिटेन – मुस्लिम 2.7%

स्पेन – मुस्लिम 4%

थाईलैण्ड – मुस्लिम 4.6%

मुस्लिम जनसंख्या के 5% से ऊपर हो जाने पर वे अपने अनुपात के हिसाब से अन्य धर्मावलम्बियों पर दबाव बढ़ाने लगते हैं और अपना “प्रभाव” जमाने की कोशिश करने लगते हैं। उदाहरण के लिये वे सरकारों और शॉपिंग मॉल पर “हलाल” का माँस रखने का दबाव बनाने लगते हैं, वे कहते हैं कि “हलाल” का माँस न खाने से उनकी धार्मिक मान्यतायें प्रभावित होती हैं। इस कदम से कई पश्चिमी देशों में “खाद्य वस्तुओं” के बाजार में मुस्लिमों की तगड़ी पैठ बनी। उन्होंने कई देशों के सुपरमार्केट के मालिकों को दबाव डालकर अपने यहाँ “हलाल” का माँस रखने को बाध्य किया। दुकानदार भी “धंधे” को देखते हुए उनका कहा मान लेता है (अधिक जनसंख्या होने का “फ़ैक्टर” यहाँ से मजबूत होना शुरु हो जाता है), ऐसा जिन देशों में हो चुका वह हैं –

फ़्रांस – मुस्लिम 8%

फ़िलीपीन्स – मुस्लिम 6%

स्वीडन – मुस्लिम 5.5%

स्विटजरलैण्ड – मुस्लिम 5.3%

नीडरलैण्ड – मुस्लिम 5.8%

त्रिनिदाद और टोबैगो – मुस्लिम 6%

इस बिन्दु पर आकर “मुस्लिम” सरकारों पर यह दबाव बनाने लगते हैं कि उन्हें उनके “क्षेत्रों” में शरीयत कानून (इस्लामिक कानून) के मुताबिक चलने दिया जाये (क्योंकि उनका अन्तिम लक्ष्य तो यही है कि समूचा विश्व “शरीयत” कानून के हिसाब से चले)। जब मुस्लिम जनसंख्या 10% से अधिक हो जाती है तब वे उस देश/प्रदेश/राज्य/क्षेत्र विशेष में कानून-व्यवस्था के लिये परेशानी पैदा करना शुरु कर देते हैं, शिकायतें करना शुरु कर देते हैं, उनकी “आर्थिक परिस्थिति” का रोना लेकर बैठ जाते हैं, छोटी-छोटी बातों को सहिष्णुता से लेने की बजाय दंगे, तोड़फ़ोड़ आदि पर उतर आते हैं, चाहे वह फ़्रांस के दंगे हों, डेनमार्क का कार्टून विवाद हो, या फ़िर एम्स्टर्डम में कारों का जलाना हो, हरेक विवाद को समझबूझ, बातचीत से खत्म करने की बजाय खामख्वाह और गहरा किया जाता है, जैसे कि –

गुयाना – मुस्लिम 10%

इसराइल – मुस्लिम 16%

केन्या – मुस्लिम 11%

रूस – मुस्लिम 15% (चेचन्या – मुस्लिम आबादी 70%)

जब मुस्लिम जनसंख्या 20% से ऊपर हो जाती है तब विभिन्न “सैनिक शाखायें” जेहाद के नारे लगाने लगती हैं, असहिष्णुता और धार्मिक हत्याओं का दौर शुरु हो जाता है, जैसे-

इथियोपिया – मुस्लिम 32.8%

भारत – मुस्लिम 22%

मुस्लिम जनसंख्या के 40% के स्तर से ऊपर पहुँच जाने पर बड़ी संख्या में सामूहिक हत्याऐं, आतंकवादी कार्रवाईयाँ आदि चलने लगते हैं, जैसे –

बोस्निया – मुस्लिम 40%

चाड – मुस्लिम 54.2%

लेबनान – मुस्लिम 59%

जब मुस्लिम जनसंख्या 60% से ऊपर हो जाती है तब अन्य धर्मावलंबियों का “जातीय सफ़ाया” शुरु किया जाता है (उदाहरण भारत का कश्मीर), जबरिया मुस्लिम बनाना, अन्य धर्मों के धार्मिक स्थल तोड़ना, जजिया जैसा कोई अन्य कर वसूलना आदि किया जाता है, जैसे –

अल्बानिया – मुस्लिम 70%

मलेशिया – मुस्लिम 62%

कतर – मुस्लिम 78%

सूडान – मुस्लिम 75%

जनसंख्या के 80% से ऊपर हो जाने के बाद तो सत्ता/शासन प्रायोजित जातीय सफ़ाई की जाती है, अन्य धर्मों के अल्पसंख्यकों को उनके मूल नागरिक अधिकारों से भी वंचित कर दिया जाता है, सभी प्रकार के हथकण्डे/हथियार अपनाकर जनसंख्या को 100% तक ले जाने का लक्ष्य रखा जाता है, जैसे –

बांग्लादेश – मुस्लिम 83%

मिस्त्र – मुस्लिम 90%

गाज़ा पट्टी – मुस्लिम 98%

ईरान – मुस्लिम 98%

ईराक – मुस्लिम 97%

जोर्डन – मुस्लिम 93%

मोरक्को – मुस्लिम 98%

पाकिस्तान – मुस्लिम 97%

सीरिया – मुस्लिम 90%

संयुक्त अरब अमीरात – मुस्लिम 96%

कोशिश करके 100% जनसंख्या मुस्लिम बन जाने पर यानी कि दारुल-इस्लाम होने की स्थिति में वहाँ सिर्फ़ मदरसे होते हैं और सिर्फ़ कुरान पढ़ाई जाती है शरिया कानून लागू होता है और उसे ही अन्तिम सत्य माना जाता है, जैसे –

अफ़गानिस्तान – मुस्लिम 100%

सऊदी अरब – मुस्लिम 100%

सोमालिया – मुस्लिम 100%a

यमन – मुस्लिम 100%

आज की स्थिति में मुस्लिमों की जनसंख्या समूचे विश्व की जनसंख्या का 22-24% है, लेकिन ईसाईयों, हिन्दुओं और यहूदियों के मुकाबले उनकी जन्मदर को देखते हुए कहा जा सकता है कि इस शताब्दी के अन्त से पहले ही मुस्लिम जनसंख्या विश्व की 50% हो जायेगी (यदि तब तक धरती बची तो)… भारत में कुल मुस्लिम जनसंख्या 15% के आसपास मानी जाती है, जबकि हकीकत यह है कि उत्तरप्रदेश, बिहार, पश्चिम बंगाल और केरल के कई जिलों में यह आँकड़ा 60 से 80% तक पहुँच चुका है… अब देश में आगे चलकर क्या परिस्थितियाँ बनेंगी यह कोई भी (“सेकुलरों” को छोड़कर) आसानी से सोच-समझ सकता है…

(सभी सन्दर्भ और आँकड़े : डॉ पीटर हैमण्ड की पुस्तक “स्लेवरी, टेररिज़्म एण्ड इस्लाम – द हिस्टोरिकल रूट्स एण्ड कण्टेम्पररी थ्रेट तथा लियोन यूरिस – “द हज”, से साभार)

भारतमाता की कुछ सेवा करना चाहते हैं  तो अधिक  से अधिक लोगों को यह तथ्य भेज कर अवगत करायें ….