Time to Understand Mohammad

From: Kuru <Rashtra1947@aol.com>

Since Mohammad is the ROLE MODEL for every Muslim on earth it is vital to understand the man.

TIME TO UNMASK MOHAMMAD!

By Geert Wilders

To know why Islam is a mortal danger one must not only consider the Koran but also the character of Muhammad, who conceived the Koran and the entirety of Islam.

The Koran is not just a book. Muslims believe that Allah himself wrote it and that it was dictated to Muhammad in the original version, the Umm al-Kitab, which is kept on a table in heaven. Consequently one cannot argue with the contents. Who would dare to disagree with what Allah himself has written? This explains much of Muhammadan behaviour, from the violence of jihad to the hatred and persecution of Jews, Christians and other non-Muslims and apostates. What we in the West regard as abnormal, is perfectly normal for Islam.

A second insuperable problem with Islam is the figure of Muhammad. He is not just anyone. He is al-insan al-kamil, the perfect man. To become a Muslim one must pronounce the Shahada (the Muslim creed). By pronouncing the Shahada one testifies that there is no god that can be worshipped except Allah, and one testifies that Muhammad is his servant and messenger.

The Koran, and hence Allah, lays down that Muhammad’s life must be imitated. The consequences of this are horrendous and can be witnessed on a daily basis.

There has been much analysis of Muhammad’s mental sanity. In spite of all the available research, it is rarely mentioned or debated. It is a taboo to discuss the true nature of the man whom one and a half billion Muslims around the world regard as a holy prophet and example to be followed. That taboo must be breached in the West, and here in the Netherlands.

Ali Sina is an Iranian ex-Muslim who established the organisation for apostates of Islam Faith Freedom International. In his latest book he posits that Muhammad is a narcissist, a paedophile, a mass murderer, a terrorist, a misogynist, a lecher, a cult leader, a madman, a rapist, a torturer, an assassin and a looter (http://www.jpost.com/Magazine/Features/Article.aspx?id=104835). Sina has offered 50,000 dollars for the one who can prove otherwise. Nobody has claimed the reward as yet. And no wonder, as the description is based on the Islamic texts themselves, such as the hadiths, the descriptions of Muhammad’s life from testimonies of contemporaries.

The historical Muhammad was the savage leader of a gang of robbers from Medina. Without scruples they looted, raped and murdered. The sources describe orgies of savagery where hundreds of people’s throats were cut, hands and feet chopped off, eyes cut out, entire tribes massacred. An example is the extinction of the Jewish Kurayza tribe in Medina in 627. One of those who chopped off their heads was Muhammad. The women and children were sold as slaves. Confronted with the lunacy of Islamic terrorists today, it is not hard to find out where the lunacy comes from.

In Vienna the women’s rights activist Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff was recently sentenced to paying a fine for insulting a religion by calling Muhammad a paedophile. However, that is the truth. (TT: The Austrian press claimed ESW labeled Mohamed as a paedophile, but the transcript proves she did not.) Numerous hadiths contain testimonies by Muhammad’s favourite wife, the child wife Aisha. Aisha literally says: “The prophet married me when I was six years old, and had intercourse with me when I was nine.”

According to the historian Theophanes (752-817) Muhammad was an epileptic. Epileptic crises are sometimes accompanied by hallucinations, perspiration form the forehead and foaming at the mouth, the very symptoms which Muhammad displayed during his visions.

In his book “The other Muhammad” (1992) the Flemish psychologist dr. Herman Somers concludes that in his forties the “prophet” began to suffer from acromegaly, a condition caused by a tumor in the pituitary gland, a small organ that is situated just below the brain. When the tumor in the pituitary gland causes too much pressure in the brain, people start to see and hear things that are not there. Somers’s psychopathological diagnosis of Muhammad’s condition is: organic hallucinatory affliction with paranoid characteristics.

The German medical historian Armin Geus speaks of a paranoid hallucinatory schizophrenia. A similar analysis can be found in the book “The Medical Case of Muhammad” by the physician Dede Korkut.

In his book “Psychology of Mohammed: Inside the Brain of a Prophet” Dr. Masud Ansari calls Muhammad “the perfect personification of a psychopath in power.” Muhammad had a unhinged paranoid personality with an inferiority complex and megalomaniac tendencies. In his forties he starts having visions that lead him to believe he has a cosmic mission, and there is no stopping him.

The truth is not always pleasant or politically correct. On the basis of the research referred to above it can be argued that the Islamic creed obliges one and a half billion people around the world, including the one million living in the Netherlands, to take Muhammad as their example. There is no turning back once one has become a Muslim. For even though article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that every person has the right to “change his religion or belief,” in Islam there is a death penalty for leaving the faith.

Anyone who voices criticism of Islam and Muhammad is in grave personal danger – as I have experienced. And whoever attempts to escape from the influence of Islam and Muhammad risks death. We cannot continue to accept this state of affairs. A public debate about the true nature and character of Muhammad can provide insight and support to Muslims all over the world who wishes to leave Islam.

Apostates are heroes and more than ever they deserve the support of freedom loving people all over the world. Party politics should not be at play in this matter. It is time for us to help these people by exposing Muhammad.

Geert Wilders is an MP in the Netherlands. He is the Chairman of the Party for Freedom (PVV)

This article was published in the Dutch weekly magazine “HP/De Tijd” of March 30, 2011

http://tundratabloids.com/2011/03/geert-wilders-time-to-unmask-muhammad.html

[see also http://books.google.co.in/books/about/Rangila_Rasul.html?id=NwFSYgEACAAJ&redir_esc=y]

===========================

NB: This revealing article on the founder of Islam ought to be taught in every school and university in the world if we are to confront GLOBAL threat (ISLAM) successfully. The perennial VICTIMS of Islam (Christians, “Kafirs”, Infidels, Hindus, Sikhs, Jews and non-Muslim females) must acquire KNOWLEDGE and courage to pass it on.

==========Luton, England. 30 May 2012=========

COMMENT (for the Vedics):

A weak Hindu nation has been an easy walkover like a doormat since 712 AD when the first Mohammed (invader, “rascal”) set foot on our civilized land. Since then we have seen millions upon millions of our ancestors (and contemporaries) KILLED, countless girls seduced, abducted and RAPED. We have seen our sacred places of worship, grand temples of the past that rivalled, even exceeded, the glory and grandeur of The Vatican, razed to ground or replaced by provocative alien mosques. We have seen our sacred TERRITORY (“dharti maata”) captured, defiled and ethnically “cleansed” through massacres and genocides by those, the despicable scum in our midst, whom we cannot “constitutionally” even call “ENEMIES”.

Every general or commander studies meticulously his counterpart in the opposing army in order to assess their capabilities, intentions and ability to inflict casualties on his own side. The exceptions are the Indian generals and our top political LEADERS who have been giving the enemy free hand. Think of the unprecedented unconditional surrenders in 1947!

Look at the British. How in the 18th and 19th centuries they sent spies and scholars to study in detail the rulers in India and their soldiers, weapons and fortifications. Seeing the Hindu nation de-linked and detached from one another, and badly divided into sects, castes and regions, they arrived in force and our country was an easy walkover.

In earlier centuries, too, wild and savage Mohammedan rulers to the West of India used to send spies to “test the ground”. Finding us disunited and squabbling among ourselves, ever ready to betray Bharat for tuppence, they came and found the Hindu nation an easy walkover. (Today, a nondescript non Hindu Italian born female of greed and defiance is also finding the Hindus and Sikhs easy walkover.)

They conquered our lands from Afghanistan to East Bengal and devastated the landscape, destroyed its beauty and the sacred sites and burnt our sacred literature while converting tens of millions, usually by FORCE, with the cry of “ISLAM OR DEATH?”.

Those cowards and dropouts, and the ignorant idiots, who converted to Islam to save their lives, are the PAKISTANIS of today.

The enemy is still on the offensive, both in and out of Bharat, even after taking “a pound of flesh and a ton of blood” of the Hindu nation.

We cannot be lulled into complacency any more by either the ruling Congress Party or the treacherous Dynasty (Nehru, down to Rahul).

In 1947 we did not know what we know today. The older ones among us will recall how false were Nehru’s wails and crocodile tears on hearing of the death of MK Gandhi. For him it was a golden opportunity to label the Hindus as fanatics, fundamentalists, dangerous and even traitors while keeping the Muslims close to his chest. The cunning barrister told the nation that the sun of “Ahimsa Parmo Dharma” (in reality, the Hindus’ “Doctrine of Death”) had set and India was plunged into pitch darkness brought about by Nathu Ram Godse and his RSS. Conveniently, he ignored his own High Treason in unconditionally surrendering the “best of India” in the words of the late Honorable Shri Gopal Godse who was promptly locked up for 20 years to deter the Hindus from singing “Vande Matram”.

Nehru’s brainwashing machines went into full swing. A statue of MK Gandhi was installed in the middle of Rajendra Lake in PATIALA that was supposed to be a Sikh State whose supreme master was Guru Gobind Singhji. Thus Nehru had slain the native “LION” by pulling out its teeth and turning the Sikhs of Patiala into “sheep”. (Sadly the municipal councilors of Patiala did behave like the sheep and obliged NEHRU. Instead of erecting the statue of Maharaja Ala Singh, the founder of Patiala Sate, they chose to put up the statue of a demoralized defeated “langoti” clad MK Gandhi.

If that UNINSPIRING statue is still standing in Patiala then we can all shout “SHAME!” on the Sikh “sheep”, controlling the brains of the warrior Sikhs there. It was the Patiala Light Infantry that was rushed to Kashmir to save Srinagar when Nehru’s “sons-in-law” invaded the State. They went “riding the martial spirit of Guru Gobind Singhji”, not on the appeasing deflated flat tire called “Gandhi”.

Nehru’s strangulating hold over the nation was not confined to Patiala only. He quickly persuaded towns and cities across the country to put up statues of MK Gandhi while at the same time, forgetting Nathu Ram’s patriotism and sacrifice. We saw schools, colleges, roads and colonies named after Gandhi as if all our genuine heroes like Netaji, Shivaji, Maharaja Ranjit Singh, Gen Hari Singh Nalwa (who conquered Khyber Pass), Rani of Jhansi and Maharana Pratap were dead or unmentionable.

The main reason of Hindus’ slavery and stooping before the Muslims is IGNORANCE, above all, ignorance about the life, character and conduct of MOHAMMED, the founder of Islam.

Geert Wilders, M.P., has exposed Mohammed like no one in Partitioned India although his own Netherlands is not yet partitioned.

This KNOWLEDGE must be spread across the whole of “Broken” Bharat. Every Hindu ought to know the REAL Mohammed as he was who started his life-long campaign to kill the Kafirs, capture their women, occupy their LANDS, and wipe out the Jews.

Please PASS IT ON till one billion Hindus know who Mohammed was and why his followers attacked India ALL OF A SUDDEN and captured five provinces with a helping hand given by our own false “Chacha” NEHRU.

Kuru

30 May 12.

www.partitionofindia.com__._

M. K. Gandhi on Conversion

From:  Sudhir Srinivasan arsudhirkumar@gmail.com

 

Mahatma Gandhi on Conversion

 

Gandhiji was not awarded the Nobel peace prize because he refused to be converted. Now that missionaries are spreading their tentacles far and wide in India converting people by allurement, inducement and fraud (In the north east killings and threats are becoming commonplace) Gandhiji’s message is all the more relevant in understanding and reacting to this problem. Missionary Terrorism will become as dangerous as Islamic terrorism if ignored. Please read & distribute.

 

Compiled by Swami Aksharananda

(Track No. 010119.1, Jan. 19, 2001)

 

I Call Myself a Sanatani Hindu

 

I call myself a Sanatani Hindu, because I believe in the Vedas, the Upanishads, the Puranas, and all that goes by the name of Hindu scripture, and therefore in avataras and rebirth; I believe in the varnashrama dharma in a sense, in my opinion strictly Vedic but not in its presently popular and distorted crude sense; I believe in the protection of cow. I do not disbelieve in murti puja. (Young India: June 10, 1921)

 

Why I am Not a Convert

 

Hinduism as I know it entirely satisfies my soul, fills my whole being. When doubts haunt me, when disappointments stare me in the face, and when I see not one ray of light on the horizon, I turn to the Bhagavad Gita, and find a verse to comfort me; and I immediately begin to smile in the midst of overwhelming sorrow. My life has been full of tragedies and if they have not left any visible and indelible effect on me, I owe it to the teachings of the Bhagavad Gita. (Young India: June 8, 1925)

 

I Disbelieve in Conversion

 

I disbelieve in the conversion of one person by another. My effort should never to be to undermine another’s faith. This implies belief in the truth of all religions and, therefore, respect for them. It implies true humility. (Young India: April 23, 1931)

 

Conversion: Impediment to Peace

 

It is impossible for me to reconcile myself to the idea of conversion after the style that goes on in India and elsewhere today. It is an error which is perhaps the greatest impediment to the world’s progress toward peace. Why should a Christian want to convert a Hindu to Christianity? Why should he not be satisfied if the Hindu is a good or godly man? (Harijan: January 30, 1937)

 

No Such Thing as Conversion

 

I believe that there is no such thing as conversion from one faith to another in the accepted sense of the word. It is a highly personal matter for the individual and his God. I may not have any design upon my neighbour as to his faith which I must honour even as I honour my own. Having reverently studied the scriptures of the world I could no more think of asking a Christian or a Musalman, or a Parsi or a Jew to change his faith than I would think of changing my own. (Harijan: September 9, 1935)

 

No Conversion Designs Upon Me

 

I am not interested in weaning you from Christianity and making you Hindu, and I do not relish your designs upon me, if you had any, to convert me to Christianity. I would also dispute your claim that Christianity is the only true religion. (Harijan: June 3, 1937)

 

Conversion

 

Conversion must not mean denationalization. Conversion should mean a definite giving up of the evil of the old, adoption of all the good of the new and a scrupulous avoidance of everything evil in the new. Conversion, therefore, should mean a life of greater dedication to one’s country, greater surrender to God, greater self-purification. (Young India: August 20, 1925)

 

Aping of Europeans and Americans

 

As I wander about through the length and breath of India I see many Christian Indians almost ashamed of their birth, certainly of their ancestral religion, and of their ancestral dress. The aping of Europeans by Anglo-Indians is bad enough, but the aping of them by Indian converts is a violence done to their country and, shall I say, even to their new religion. (Young India: August 8, 1925)

 

Why Should I Change My Religion

 

I hold that proselytisation under the cloak of humanitarian work is unhealthy to say the least. It is most resented by people here. Religion after all is a deeply personal thing. It touches the heart.

 

Why should I change my religion because the doctor who professes Christianity as his religion has cured me of some disease, or why should the doctor expect me to change whilst I am under his influence? (Young India: April 23, 1931)

 

Missionary Aim: Uprooting Hinduism

 

My fear is that though Christian friends nowadays do not say or admit it that Hindu religion is untrue, they must harbour in their breast that Hinduism is an error and that Christianity, as they believe it, is the only true religion. So far as one can understand the present (Christian) effort, it is to uproot Hinduism from her very foundation and replace it by another faith. (Harijan: March 13,1937)

 

Undermining People’s Faith

 

The first distinction I would like to make between your missionary work and mine is that while I am strengthening the faith of people, you (missionaries) are undermining it. (Young India: November 8, 1927)

 

Physician Heal Yourself

 

Conversion nowadays has become a matter of business, like any other. India (Hindus) is in no need of conversion of this kind. Conversion in the sense of self-purification, self-realization is the crying need of the times. That however is never what is meant by proselytization. To those who would convert India (Hindus), might it not be said, “Physician, heal yourself.” (Young India: April 23, 1931)

 

Missionaries: Vendors of Goods

 

When the missionary of another religion goes to them, he goes like a vendor of goods. He has no special spiritual merit that will distinguish him from those to whom he goes. He does however possess material goods which he promises to those who will come to his fold. (Harijan: April 3, 1937)

 

If I had the Power and Could Legislate.

 

If I had the power and could legislate, I should stop all proselytizing. In Hindu households the advent of a missionary has meant the disruption of the family coming in the wake of change of dress, manners, language, food and drink . (November 5, 1935)

 

The Only Begotten Son of God?

 

I regard Jesus as a great teacher of humanity, but I do not regard him as the only begotten son of God. That epithet in its material interpretation is quite unacceptable. Metaphorically we are all sons of God, but for each of us there may be different sons of God in a special sense. Thus for me Chaitanya may be the only begotten son of God. God cannot be the exclusive Father and I cannot ascribe exclusive divinity to Jesus. (Harijan: June 3, 1937)

 

Western Christianity Today

 

It is my firm opinion that Europe (and the United States) does not represent the spirit of God or Christianity but the spirit of Satan. And Satan’s successes are the greatest when appears with the name of God on his lips. (Young India: September 8, 1920)

 

I consider western Christianity in its practical working a negation of Christ’s Christianity. I cannot conceive Jesus, if he was living in flesh in our midst, approving of modern Christian organizations, public worship, or ministry. (Young India: September 22, 1921)

 

Christianity and Imperialistic Exploitation

 

Christianity in India has been inextricably mixed up for the last one hundred and fifty years with British rule. It appears to us as synonymous with materialistic civilization and imperialistic exploitation by the stronger white races of the weaker races of the world. Its contribution to India has been, therefore, largely negative. (Young India: March 21, 1929)

 

No Room For Them

 

In the manner in which they are working there would seem to be no room for them. Quite unconsciously they do harm to themselves and also to us. It is perhaps impertinent to say that they do harm to themselves, but quite pertinent to say that they do harm to us. They do harm to those amongst whom they work and those amongst whom they do not work, i.e., the harm is done to the whole of India. The more I study their activities the more sorry I become. It is a tragedy that such a thing should happen to the human family. (Harijan: December 12, 1936)

 

Outrage!

 

Only the other day a missionary descended on a famine area with money in his pocket, distributed it among the famine stricken, converted them to his fold, took charge of their temple, and demolished it. This is outrageous. (Harijan: November 5, 1937)

 

Let the Hindu be a Better Hindu

 

I came to the conclusion long ago that all religions were true and also that all had some error in them, and whilst I hold by my own, I should hold others as dear as Hinduism. So we can only pray, if we are Hindus, not that a Christian should become a Hindu. But our innermost prayer should be a Hindu should be a better Hindu, a Muslim a better Muslim, a Christian a better Christian. (Young India: January 19, 1928)

 

Welcome Them Back

 

If a person through fear, compulsion, starvation, or for material gain or consideration goes over to another faith, it is a misnomer to call it conversion. Most cases of conversion have been to my mind a false coin. I would therefore unhesitatingly re-admit to the Hindu fold all such repentants without much ado. If a man comes back to the original branch, he deserves to be welcomed in so far as he may deem to have erred, he has sufficiently purged himself of it when he repents his error and retraces his steps. (Collected Works: Vol. 66, pp. 163-164)

 

Hindustan needs to be made a Hindu raashtra.

Hindustan needs to be made a Hindu raashtra.

The Vedic dharma is universal religion for mankind. It is tolerant of all the tolerant faiths. Therefore, Bhaarat does not need “Secularism” which is European medicine against Christianity. – skanda987

 —

From: KatariaN@aol.com

VIDEO OF THE HEART-RENDING SPEECH DELIVERED

BY SHRI TAPAN GHOSH.

 

MUST FOR EVERY PATRIOT HINDU WHO WANTS TO DO SOMETHING FOR HIS/HER PUNIYA BHOOMI BHARAT

 

OUR HEARTY CONGRATULATIONS TO SHRI TAPAN GHOSH.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-1Olyn15Xk

(one hour video)

RESPECTED COLLEAGUES:

Enclosed herewith please find a passionate but logical speech delivered by Shri Tapan Ghosh of Hindu Samhati, Kolkata.

 

Shri Tapan Ghosh cogently argues that since Bharat was divided in 1947 on the basis of two nation theory how come Hindus are still being insulted and treated like second class citizens in their own country and Muslims are pampered by the Government of India.

 

Tapan Da firmly believes and cautions Hindus that Secularism as practiced in India will obliterate Hinduism from Indian soil and will pave the way for Islamization of Bharat.

 

Narain Kataria

 

 

No need for reservation for Muslims in Bhaarat

No need for reservation for Muslims in Bhaarat

From: J. G. Arora <jgarora@gmail.com>

Dear friends,

Namaste.

With reference to Shri Agniveer’s excellent mail / write-up regarding Swami Ram Dev’s alleged statement supporting reservation for Muslims in government jobs and educational institutions, following facts are submitted for your kind consideration:

1. If swami Ram Dev’s alleged statement supporting reservation for Muslims is true, it is very unfortunate; and it demolishes Swami Ram Dev’s credibility among the nationalists. Moreover, it defies logic and Bharat’s history.

2. Bharat Varsha including the present day India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Afghanistan and even Zabol in Iran was Hindu land with zero Muslim population till 711 when Muhammad bin Qasim’s Arab army attacked Sindh. Defending their motherland valiantly during repeated Muslim attacks for over a thousand years, Hindus lost areas now known as Afghanistan in 987, and Pakistan and Bangladesh to Muslims in 1947 besides losing millions of lives, and suffering destruction and plunder of thousands of their temples.

3. Proponents of Muslim reservation forget how Muslims had demanded and obtained Pakistan for Muslims in 1947.

Formed in 1906, Muslim League demanded Pakistan on March 23, 1940 with Muhammad Ali Jinnah proclaiming that Hindus and Muslims belonged to two different religions, civilizations and nations which could never live together in one country; and demanding Pakistan, a separate country for Muslims, comprising Muslim majority areas in India.

4. In 1945-46 elections, Muslims overwhelmingly voted for creation of Pakistan. In 1947, the Muslims got a third of Bharat’s land as Pakistan. In 1971, East Pakistan became Bangladesh while West Pakistan was renamed as Pakistan.

5. Both Pakistan and Bangladesh are Islamic Republics and have driven out most of Hindus and Sikhs from their land.  However, most of Indian Muslims who had demanded Pakistan and exchange of population did not go to Pakistan. Rather, the present percentage of Muslim population in India is much higher than that in 1947.

After the creation of Pakistan, Indian Muslims can have rights only as Indians and not as Muslims; and any reservation for Muslims in truncated India is untenable.

6. Logically in 1947, on India’s partition on religious basis and creation of Pakistan for Muslims as demanded by Muslims, truncated Bharat should have been declared a Hindu republic to re-assert its Hindu identity. However, a perverse ‘secularism’ was foisted on Bharat where anything which is anti-Hindu, pro-Muslim, divisive, sectarian, and even anti-national is ‘secularism’.

7. Hindus have already lost the lands now known as Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan which used to be Hindu lands.  And because of unchecked infiltration of Pak-Bangla nationals, and foreign-funded conversions, with each passing day, even the truncated India is being made more Islamic and more Christian and less Hindu.

8. Since fake-secular India has proved to be a disaster for Hindus, nationalists must transform ‘pseudo-secular’ India into genuinely secular Hindu Bharat wherein there will be one law and one nation; no distinction of majority and minority; no discrimination against any community; and same rights for all citizens.

9. What is required is not the reservation for Muslims but an end of the politics of divisive appeasement which is demolishing India and creating pre-1947 situation which would dismember India further.

10. In order to crush daily Pak-Bangla demographic aggression, to prevent the creation of more Pakistans and Bangladeshs on Indian soil, to ensure justice to all and appeasement of none, to give good governance, and to protect Hinduism, Hindu civilization, Hindu heritage and Hindu identity of truncated India, all nationalist individuals and social and religious organizations must actively participate in politics and transform  the fake-secular India into a genuinely secular Hindu Republic of Bharat by all peaceful, constitutional and lawful means.

11. No one can have any valid objection to the declaration of Bharat as a Hindu country when all the 57 Muslim majority countries are declared as Islamic countries.

I shall be grateful for your views in the matter.

Shubham astu,

J.G. Arora

From: Agniveer Agni <agniveer@gmail.com>
Arora ji,
Very valid points (you) raised. Our take on this point by point:

1. We agree it defies logic and Bharat’s history. We communicated with Ramdevji’s organizations, but have received responses that indicate that they are defiant on their stand and call us traitors, prostitutes etc for opposing him on this issue.

2. The history since Qasim plundered is indeed brutal. So any policy framework in country should incentivize and encourage people to realign with their original roots. This must be done compassionately, justly and sincerely.

3. We have lost major parts of our territory to separatists. Any move to encourage separatism or appease those who consider non-believers as Kafirs destined for eternal Hell should be strongly opposed.

4. Partition was a blunder. We should have been brave enough to ensure no division of oldest nation of world and deal with our internal problems like Shivaji. Tomorrow we may partition yet another part of India if population of separatists increases.

5. India should take ownership of Hindus and Sikhs in Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan. They are suffering because of blunders of our forefathers. Tomorrow if Delhi is termed an Islamic nation separate from India by few politicians, and then my granddaughter is raped like it is happening in Pakistan today, it is definitely a fault of those who arbitrarily made me Kafir in my own motherland.

6. We don’t bother much about India being declared Hindu rashtra on paper. That, if happens, is most welcome. After all Hindu represents a noble way of life. But more importantly, India must be a country that safeguards interests of all Hindus of the world and has no room for appeasement. Secularism is ok till it allows personal freedom to profess any religion. The moment it starts causing population of majority peacefuls to dwindle, it turns into pseudo-secularism.

7. Infiltrators should be pushed out, or Bangladesh be officially made part of India. Any intermediate step of feeding parasites at expense of poor Indians is anti-national.

8. Exactly. Uniform Civil and Criminal Code.

9. Further, any minority group that claims that whosoever does not follow their religion is worst of creatures or will go to Hell forever should be banned.

10. The problem with politics today is that it thrives on chamchagiri of existing politicians, or unethical appeasement, or money-power precluding possibility of any sincere competent person joining. So we have either personality cults or gundaraaj. We believe this would take time to change the patterns. But we should be open to moments of opportunities.

11. More than declaration, there should be changes in laws and procedures. If that happens over a period of time, and we evolve into a non-appeasing rationally driven country, rest would automatically happen.

Dhanyavad

 

INDENTURED LABOR – ANOTHER FORM OF THE SLAVE TRADE

Dr. Satish Prakash satishprakash@yahoo.com
May 23 (2 days ago)

to family, persaudpun, Vivekanand, aryasamajonline, aryayouthgroup, mohabir, SatiGurdial

 

Watch this BBC documentary and understand how Britain instituted another form of slave trade in bringing our foreparents to its colonies.  Sad, very sad!
Satish Prakash, PhD, Vyakaranacharya
Founder-Acharya, Maharshi Dayananda Gurukula
Missionary of the Arya Samaj

Save the Cow, Save Earth

Save the Cow, Save Earth

By Subramanian Swamy

 

Our West-influenced intellectuals sneer at the mention of the cow. The same intellectuals first sneered at yoga. Now it is a fashion to do pranayama at cocktail parties The arguments in the West for cow slaughter are no more uncontested. They also sneered at our sanyasis as `godmen’. Now they flock to ashrams with their white friends ever since the Beatles. Who knows, they may soon have a cow in their backyards.
India has 150 million cows, each of them giving an average of less than 200 litres of milk per year. If they could be fed and looked after, they can give 11,000 litres, as Israeli cows do. That would provide milk for the whole world. The milk we produce today is the cheapest in the world. With enhanced production we could become the world’s largest exporter of milk and it could be India’s biggest foreign exchange earner.

For those of us who are desi by pedigree and conviction, I place some facts about the cow in the perspective of modern Hindutva.

The cow was elevated to divinity in the Rig Veda. In Book VI, Hymn XXVIII attributed to Rishi Bhardwaja extols the virtue of the cow. In Atharva Veda (Book X, Hymn X), the cow is formally designated as Vishnu, and `all that the Sun surveys’.

Indian society has addressed the cow as gow mata. The Churning of the Sea episode brings to light the story of the creation of the cow. Five divine Kamadhenus (wish cows), viz, Nanda, Subhadra, Surabhi, Sushila, Bahula emerged in the churning.

Thousands of names in our country are cow-related: Gauhati, Gorakhpur, Goa, Godhra, Gondiya, Godavari, Goverdhan, Gautam, Gomukh, Gokarna, Goyal, Gochar etc.

They signify reverence for the cow, and our abiding faith that the cow is Annapurna.

In 2003, the National Commission on Cattle under Justice G. M. Lodha submitted its recommendations to the NDA government. The report called for stringent laws to protect the cow and its progeny in the interest of the rural economy, a constitutional requirement under Directive Principles of State Policy. Article 48 of the Constitution says: `The State shall endeavour to organise agriculture and animal husbandry on modern and scientific lines and shall, in particular, take steps for preserving and improving the breeds, and prohibiting the slaughter of cows and calves and other milch and draught cattle’. During the First War of Independence in 1857, when Bahadur Shah `Zafar’ was installed as emperor by the Hindus in Delhi for a brief period, his Hindu prime minister, on the emperor’s proclamation, made cow killing a capital offence. In Maharaja Ranjit Singh’s kingdom, the only crime that invited capital punishment was cow slaughter.

The cow, according to the Vedas, provides four products for human use: (i) Godugdha (cow milk): As per Ayurveda, cow milk has fat, carbohydrates, minerals and Vitamin B, and even a capacity for body resistance to radiation and for regenerating brain cells. (ii) Goghruta (ghee): The best ghee, it is, as per Ayurveda useful in many disorders. In yajna, it improves the air’s oxygen level. (iii) Gomutra (urine): Eight types of urine are used for medicinal purpose nowadays, among which cow urine is held to be the best. The Americans are busy patenting it. It has anti-cancer, anti-bacterial, anti-fungal and antioxidant properties.

It has immune-modulator properties, which makes it useful for immune deficiency diseases. In the classics there are many references to cow urine as a drug of choice. Even the Parsis follow this practice.

Lastly, (iv), Gomaya (dung) is considered as valuable as Gomutra and used to purify the environment, as it has radium and checks radiation effects.

Ancient Hindu wisdom on the medicinal properties of cow urine is borne out by two patents granted in the US for cow urine distillate (Patent numbers 6410059 and 6896907).

Even China has granted the distillate a patent as a DNA protector. A global patent has been granted for cow urine, neem and garlic as a pest repellent and for fungicidal and growth promoting properties for different crops (WHO 2004/ 087618A1). A US patent has been granted for strains from Sahiwal cow milk for plant growth promoter phytopathogenic fungi controlling activity, abiotic stress tolerating capability, phosphatic solubilisation capability, etc. And CSIR has filed for a US patent for amrit pani, a mixture of cow dung, cow urine and jiggery, for soil health improvement properties.

These claims were initially made in the Charaka Samhita, Sushrut, Vaghbhati and Nighantu, Ratnakar, etc. They prove the utility of cow dung and urine for sustainable agriculture as well as for disease prevention.

The arguments in the West for cow slaughter are no more uncontested. There are better sources of protein than beef. Any dietician’s chart shows that beef with 22 per cent protein ranks below soya-bean (43), groundnut (31) and pulses (24 per cent). One kilogram of beef takes seven kg of crops and 7,000 kg of water to produce.

Thus cow protection makes economic and ecological sense. Swami Dayananda Saraswati, convenor of the Hindu Dharma Acharya Sabha, has argued that non-vegetarianism indirectly contributes heavily to greenhouse gases and other pollution.

He quotes a UN report from 2006 that says, “Raising animals for meat as food generates more greenhouse gases than all the cars and trucks in the world combined”. Ten of billions of animals farmed for food release gases such as methane, nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide through their massive amounts of manure. “The released methane”, the report says, “has 23 times the global warming potential of CO2”. For these animals to graze, virgin forests are cleared. The livestock industry also needs vast stretches of land to raise mono-crops to feed the animals. The CO2 that the trees and plants store escapes into the air when they are destroyed.

Growing fodder implies heavy use of synthetic fertilizers produced with fossil fuels.

While this process emits a huge amount of CO2, the fertilizer itself releases nitrous oxide (3) — a greenhouse gas that is 296 times more potent than CO2. Alarming though these facts are, all that people have to do is to avoid red meat. There will be no need to breed millions of animals for daily slaughter. The animal population will consequently decline.

A single individual by not consuming meat prevents the equivalent of 1.5 tonnes of CO2 emissions in a year. This is more than the one tonne of CO2 prevented by switching from a large sedan to a small car.

So there are a number of reasons to be a vegetarian. People who eat meat think a pure vegetarian diet is optional. But now they have no choice if they are alive to what is happening to this life-bearing planet. There is no justification for eating meat, given the devastating consequences for the planet.

A new fervour for a cow renaissance is necessary. It is constitutional (for India) and we should defend it with all our might. 

Thanks & Regards,

Sudhir Srinivasan
B.Arch, MSc.CPM, Dip.ID, Dip.CAD, Dip.PM
|Architect|

“Transfer of Power Agreement” को जाने और दुसरो को बताएं

From: MahanDeshBharat swarnimrashtra@gmail.com

“Transfer of Power Agreement” को जाने और दुसरो को बताएं
14 अगस्त 1947 कि रात को आजादी नहीं आई बल्कि ट्रान्सफर ऑफ़ पॉवर का एग्रीमेंट हुआ था.

सत्ता के हस्तांतरण की संधि ( Transfer of Power Agreement ) यानि भारत के आज़ादी की संधि | ये इतनी खतरनाक संधि है की अगर आप अंग्रेजों द्वारा सन 1615 से लेकर 1857 तक किये गए सभी 565 संधियों या कहें साजिस को जोड़ देंगे तो उस से भी ज्यादा खतरनाक संधि है ये | 14 अगस्त 1947 की रात को जो कुछ हुआ है वो आजादी नहीं आई बल्कि ट्रान्सफर ऑफ़ पॉवर का एग्रीमेंट हुआ था पंडित नेहरु और लोर्ड माउन्ट बेटन के बीच में | Transfer of Power और Independence ये दो अलग चीजे है | स्वतंत्रता और सत्ता का हस्तांतरण ये दो अलग चीजे है |

और सत्ता का हस्तांतरण कैसे होता है ? आप देखते होंगे क़ि एक पार्टी की सरकार है, वो चुनाव में हार जाये, दूसरी पार्टी की सरकार आती है तो दूसरी पार्टी का प्रधानमन्त्री जब शपथ ग्रहण करता है, तो वो शपथ ग्रहण करने के तुरंत बाद एक रजिस्टर पर हस्ताक्षर करता है, आप लोगों में से बहुतों ने देखा होगा, तो जिस रजिस्टर पर आने वाला प्रधानमन्त्री हस्ताक्षर करता है, उसी रजिस्टर को ट्रान्सफर ऑफ़ पॉवर की बुक कहते है और उस पर हस्ताक्षर के बाद पुराना प्रधानमन्त्री नए प्रधानमन्त्री को सत्ता सौंप देता है | और पुराना प्रधानमंत्री निकल कर बाहर चला जाता है | यही नाटक हुआ था 14 अगस्त 1947 की रात को 12 बजे | लार्ड माउन्ट बेटन ने अपनी सत्ता पंडित नेहरु के हाथ में सौंपी थी, और हमने कह दिया कि स्वराज्य आ गया | कैसा स्वराज्य और काहे का स्वराज्य ? अंग्रेजो के लिए स्वराज्य का मतलब क्या था ? और हमारे लिए स्वराज्य का मतलब क्या था ? ये भी समझ लीजिये | अंग्रेज कहते थे क़ि हमने स्वराज्य दिया, माने अंग्रेजों ने अपना राज तुमको सौंपा है ताकि तुम लोग कुछ दिन इसे चला लो जब जरुरत पड़ेगी तो हम दुबारा आ जायेंगे |

ये अंग्रेजो का interpretation (व्याख्या) था | और हिन्दुस्तानी लोगों की व्याख्या क्या थी कि हमने स्वराज्य ले लिया | और इस संधि के अनुसार ही भारत के दो टुकड़े किये गए और भारत और पाकिस्तान नामक दो Dominion States बनाये गए हैं | ये Dominion State का अर्थ हिंदी में होता है एक बड़े राज्य के अधीन एक छोटा राज्य, ये शाब्दिक अर्थ है और भारत के सन्दर्भ में इसका असल अर्थ भी यही है | अंग्रेजी में इसका एक अर्थ है “One of the self-governing nations in the British Commonwealth” और दूसरा “Dominance or power through legal authority “| Dominion State और Independent Nation में जमीन आसमान का अंतर होता है | मतलब सीधा है क़ि हम (भारत और पाकिस्तान) आज भी अंग्रेजों के अधीन/मातहत ही हैं | दुःख तो ये होता है की उस समय के सत्ता के लालची लोगों ने बिना सोचे समझे या आप कह सकते हैं क़ि पुरे होशो हवास में इस संधि को मान लिया या कहें जानबूझ कर ये सब स्वीकार कर लिया | और ये जो तथाकथित आज़ादी आयी, इसका कानून अंग्रेजों के संसद में बनाया गया और इसका नाम रखा गया Indian Independence Act यानि भारत के स्वतंत्रता का कानून | और ऐसे धोखाधड़ी से अगर इस देश की आजादी आई हो तो वो आजादी, आजादी है कहाँ ? और इसीलिए गाँधी जी (महात्मा गाँधी) 14 अगस्त 1947 की रात को दिल्ली में नहीं आये थे | वो नोआखाली में थे | और कोंग्रेस के बड़े नेता गाँधी जी को बुलाने के लिए गए थे कि बापू चलिए आप | गाँधी जी ने मना कर दिया था | क्यों ? गाँधी जी कहते थे कि मै मानता नहीं कि कोई आजादी आ रही है | और गाँधी जी ने स्पस्ट कह दिया था कि ये आजादी नहीं आ रही है सत्ता के हस्तांतरण का समझौता हो रहा है | और गाँधी जी ने नोआखाली से प्रेस विज्ञप्ति जारी की थी |

उस प्रेस स्टेटमेंट के पहले ही वाक्य में गाँधी जी ने ये कहा कि मै हिन्दुस्तान के उन करोडो लोगों को ये सन्देश देना चाहता हु कि ये जो तथाकथित आजादी (So Called Freedom) आ रही है ये मै नहीं लाया | ये सत्ता के लालची लोग सत्ता के हस्तांतरण के चक्कर में फंस कर लाये है | मै मानता नहीं कि इस देश में कोई आजादी आई है | और 14 अगस्त 1947 की रात को गाँधी जी दिल्ली में नहीं थे नोआखाली में थे | माने भारत की राजनीति का सबसे बड़ा पुरोधा जिसने हिन्दुस्तान की आज़ादी की लड़ाई की नीव रखी हो वो आदमी 14 अगस्त 1947 की रात को दिल्ली में मौजूद नहीं था | क्यों ?

इसका अर्थ है कि गाँधी जी इससे सहमत नहीं थे | (नोआखाली के दंगे तो एक बहाना था असल बात तो ये सत्ता का हस्तांतरण ही था) और 14 अगस्त 1947 की रात को जो कुछ हुआ है वो आजादी नहीं आई …. ट्रान्सफर ऑफ़ पॉवर का एग्रीमेंट लागू हुआ था पंडित नेहरु और अंग्रेजी सरकार के बीच में | अब शर्तों की बात करता हूँ , सब का जिक्र करना तो संभव नहीं है लेकिन कुछ महत्वपूर्ण शर्तों की जिक्र जरूर करूंगा जिसे एक आम भारतीय जानता है और उनसे परिचित है. इस संधि की शर्तों के मुताबिक हम आज भी अंग्रेजों के अधीन/मातहत ही हैं | वो एक शब्द आप सब सुनते हैं न Commonwealth Nations | अभी कुछ दिन पहले दिल्ली में Commonwealth Game हुए थे आप सब को याद होगा ही और उसी में बहुत बड़ा घोटाला भी हुआ है | ये Commonwealth का मतलब होता है समान सम्पति | किसकी समान सम्पति ? ब्रिटेन की रानी की समान सम्पति | आप जानते हैं ब्रिटेन की महारानी हमारे भारत की भी महारानी है और वो आज भी भारत की नागरिक है और हमारे जैसे 71 देशों की महारानी है वो | Commonwealth में 71 देश है और इन सभी 71 देशों में जाने के लिए ब्रिटेन की महारानी को वीजा की जरूरत नहीं होती है क्योंकि वो अपने ही देश में जा रही है लेकिन भारत के प्रधानमंत्री और राष्ट्रपति को ब्रिटेन में जाने के लिए वीजा की जरूरत होती है क्योंकि वो दुसरे देश में जा रहे हैं | मतलब इसका निकाले तो ये हुआ कि या तो ब्रिटेन की महारानी भारत की नागरिक है या फिर भारत आज भी ब्रिटेन का उपनिवेश है इसलिए ब्रिटेन की रानी को पासपोर्ट और वीजा की जरूरत नहीं होती है अगर दोनों बाते सही है तो 15 अगस्त 1947 को हमारी आज़ादी की बात कही जाती है वो झूठ है | और Commonwealth Nations में हमारी एंट्री जो है वो एक Dominion State के रूप में है न क़ि Independent Nation के रूप में| इस देश में प्रोटोकोल है क़ि जब भी नए राष्ट्रपति बनेंगे तो 21 तोपों की सलामी दी जाएगी उसके अलावा किसी को भी नहीं | लेकिन ब्रिटेन की महारानी आती है तो उनको भी 21 तोपों की सलामी दी जाती है, इसका क्या मतलब है? और पिछली बार ब्रिटेन की महारानी यहाँ आयी थी तो एक निमंत्रण पत्र छपा था और उस निमंत्रण पत्र में ऊपर जो नाम था वो ब्रिटेन की महारानी का था और उसके नीचे भारत के राष्ट्रपति का नाम था मतलब हमारे देश का राष्ट्रपति देश का प्रथम नागरिक नहीं है | ये है राजनितिक गुलामी, हम कैसे माने क़ि हम एक स्वतंत्र देश में रह रहे हैं | एक शब्द आप सुनते होंगे High Commission ये अंग्रेजों का एक गुलाम देश दुसरे गुलाम देश के यहाँ खोलता है लेकिन इसे Embassy नहीं कहा जाता | एक मानसिक गुलामी का उदहारण भी देखिये ……. हमारे यहाँ के अख़बारों में आप देखते होंगे क़ि कैसे शब्द प्रयोग होते हैं – (ब्रिटेन की महारानी नहीं) महारानी एलिज़ाबेथ, (ब्रिटेन के प्रिन्स चार्ल्स नहीं) प्रिन्स चार्ल्स , (ब्रिटेन की प्रिंसेस नहीं) प्रिंसेस डैना (अब तो वो हैं नहीं), अब तो एक और प्रिन्स विलियम भी आ गए है |
भारत का नाम INDIA रहेगा और सारी दुनिया में भारत का नाम इंडिया प्रचारित किया जायेगा और सारे सरकारी दस्तावेजों में इसे इंडिया के ही नाम से संबोधित किया जायेगा | हमारे और आपके लिए ये भारत है लेकिन दस्तावेजों में ये इंडिया है | संविधान के प्रस्तावना में ये लिखा गया है “India that is Bharat ” जब क़ि होना ये चाहिए था “Bharat that was India ” लेकिन दुर्भाग्य इस देश का क़ि ये भारत के जगह इंडिया हो गया | ये इसी संधि के शर्तों में से एक है | अब हम भारत के लोग जो इंडिया कहते हैं वो कहीं से भी भारत नहीं है | कुछ दिन पहले मैं एक लेख पढ़ रहा था अब किसका था याद नहीं आ रहा है उसमे उस व्यक्ति ने बताया था कि इंडिया का नाम बदल के भारत कर दिया जाये तो इस देश में आश्चर्यजनक बदलाव आ जायेगा और ये विश्व की बड़ी शक्ति बन जायेगा अब उस शख्स के बात में कितनी सच्चाई है मैं नहीं जानता, लेकिन भारत जब तक भारत था तब तक तो दुनिया में सबसे आगे था और ये जब से इंडिया हुआ है तब से पीछे, पीछे और पीछे ही होता जा रहा है |

भारत के संसद में वन्दे मातरम नहीं गया जायेगा अगले 50 वर्षों तक यानि 1997 तक | 1997 में पूर्व प्रधानमंत्री चंद्रशेखर ने इस मुद्दे को संसद में उठाया तब जाकर पहली बार इस तथाकथित आजाद देश की संसद में वन्देमातरम गाया गया | 50 वर्षों तक नहीं गाया गया क्योंकि ये भी इसी संधि की शर्तों में से एक है | और वन्देमातरम को ले के मुसलमानों में जो भ्रम फैलाया गया वो अंग्रेजों के दिशानिर्देश पर ही हुआ था | इस गीत में कुछ भी ऐसा आपत्तिजनक नहीं है जो मुसलमानों के दिल को ठेस पहुचाये | आपत्तिजनक तो जन,गन,मन में है जिसमे एक शख्स को भारत भाग्यविधाता यानि भारत के हर व्यक्ति का भगवान बताया गया है या कहें भगवान से भी बढ़कर |

इस संधि की शर्तों के अनुसार सुभाष चन्द्र बोस को जिन्दा या मुर्दा अंग्रेजों के हवाले करना था | यही वजह रही क़ि सुभाष चन्द्र बोस अपने देश के लिए लापता रहे और कहाँ मर खप गए ये आज तक किसी को मालूम नहीं है | समय समय पर कई अफवाहें फैली लेकिन सुभाष चन्द्र बोस का पता नहीं लगा और न ही किसी ने उनको ढूँढने में रूचि दिखाई | मतलब भारत का एक महान स्वतंत्रता सेनानी अपने ही देश के लिए बेगाना हो गया | सुभाष चन्द्र बोस ने आजाद हिंद फौज बनाई थी ये तो आप सब लोगों को मालूम होगा ही लेकिन महत्वपूर्ण बात ये है क़ि ये 1942 में बनाया गया था और उसी समय द्वितीय विश्वयुद्ध चल रहा था और सुभाष चन्द्र बोस ने इस काम में जर्मन और जापानी लोगों से मदद ली थी जो कि अंग्रेजो के दुश्मन थे और इस आजाद हिंद फौज ने अंग्रेजों को सबसे ज्यादा नुकसान पहुँचाया था | और जर्मनी के हिटलर और इंग्लैंड के एटली और चर्चिल के व्यक्तिगत विवादों की वजह से ये द्वितीय विश्वयुद्ध हुआ था और दोनों देश एक दुसरे के कट्टर दुश्मन थे | एक दुश्मन देश की मदद से सुभाष चन्द्र बोस ने अंग्रेजों के नाकों चने चबवा दिए थे | एक तो अंग्रेज उधर विश्वयुद्ध में लगे थे दूसरी तरफ उन्हें भारत में भी सुभाष चन्द्र बोस की वजह से परेशानियों का सामना करना पड़ रहा था | इसलिए वे सुभाष चन्द्र बोस के दुश्मन थे | इस संधि की शर्तों के अनुसार भगत सिंह, चंद्रशेखर आजाद, अशफाकुल्लाह, रामप्रसाद विस्मिल जैसे लोग आतंकवादी थे और यही हमारे syllabus में पढाया जाता था बहुत दिनों तक | और अभी एक महीने पहले तक ICSE बोर्ड के किताबों में भगत सिंह को आतंकवादी ही बताया जा रहा था, वो तो भला हो कुछ लोगों का जिन्होंने अदालत में एक केस किया और अदालत ने इसे हटाने का आदेश दिया है (ये समाचार मैंने इन्टरनेट पर ही अभी कुछ दिन पहले देखा था) |

आप भारत के सभी बड़े रेलवे स्टेशन पर एक किताब की दुकान देखते होंगे “व्हीलर बुक स्टोर” वो इसी संधि की शर्तों के अनुसार है | ये व्हीलर कौन था ? ये व्हीलर सबसे बड़ा अत्याचारी था | इसने इस देश क़ि हजारों माँ, बहन और बेटियों के साथ बलात्कार किया था | इसने किसानों पर सबसे ज्यादा गोलियां चलवाई थी | 1857 की क्रांति के बाद कानपुर के नजदीक बिठुर में व्हीलर और नील नामक दो अंग्रजों ने यहाँ के सभी 24 हजार लोगों को जान से मरवा दिया था चाहे वो गोदी का बच्चा हो या मरणासन्न हालत में पड़ा कोई बुड्ढा | इस व्हीलर के नाम से इंग्लैंड में एक एजेंसी शुरू हुई थी और वही भारत में आ गयी | भारत आजाद हुआ तो ये ख़त्म होना चाहिए था, नहीं तो कम से कम नाम भी बदल देते | लेकिन वो नहीं बदला गया क्योंकि ये इस संधि में है |

इस संधि की शर्तों के अनुसार अंग्रेज देश छोड़ के चले जायेगे लेकिन इस देश में कोई भी कानून चाहे वो किसी क्षेत्र में हो नहीं बदला जायेगा | इसलिए आज भी इस देश में 34735 कानून वैसे के वैसे चल रहे हैं जैसे अंग्रेजों के समय चलता था | Indian Police Act, Indian Civil Services Act (अब इसका नाम है Indian Civil Administrative Act), Indian Penal Code (Ireland में भी IPC चलता है और Ireland में जहाँ “I” का मतलब Irish है वही भारत के IPC में “I” का मतलब Indian है बाकि सब के सब कंटेंट एक ही है, कौमा और फुल स्टॉप का भी अंतर नहीं है) Indian
Citizenship Act, Indian Advocates Act, Indian Education Act, Land Acquisition Act, Criminal Procedure Act, Indian Evidence Act, Indian Income Tax Act, Indian Forest Act, Indian Agricultural Price Commission Act सब के सब आज भी वैसे ही चल रहे हैं बिना फुल स्टॉप और कौमा बदले हुए |

इस संधि के अनुसार अंग्रेजों द्वारा बनाये गए भवन जैसे के तैसे रखे जायेंगे | शहर का नाम, सड़क का नाम सब के सब वैसे ही रखे जायेंगे | आज देश का संसद भवन, सुप्रीम कोर्ट, हाई कोर्ट, राष्ट्रपति भवन कितने नाम गिनाऊँ सब के सब वैसे ही खड़े हैं और हमें मुंह चिढ़ा रहे हैं | लार्ड डलहौजी के नाम पर डलहौजी शहर है , वास्को डी गामा नामक शहर है (हाला क़ि वो पुर्तगाली था ) रिपन रोड, कर्जन रोड, मेयो रोड, बेंटिक रोड, (पटना में) फ्रेजर रोड, बेली रोड, ऐसे हजारों भवन और रोड हैं, सब के सब वैसे के वैसे ही हैं | आप भी अपने शहर में देखिएगा वहां भी कोई न कोई भवन, सड़क उन लोगों के नाम से होंगे | हमारे गुजरात में एक शहर है सूरत, इस सूरत शहर में एक बिल्डिंग है उसका नाम है कूपर विला | अंग्रेजों को जब जहाँगीर ने व्यापार का लाइसेंस दिया था तो सबसे पहले वो सूरत में आये थे और सूरत में उन्होंने इस बिल्डिंग का निर्माण किया था | ये गुलामी का पहला अध्याय आज तक सूरत शहर में खड़ा है |

हमारे यहाँ शिक्षा व्यवस्था अंग्रेजों की है क्योंकि ये इस संधि में लिखा है और मजे क़ि बात ये है क़ि अंग्रेजों ने हमारे यहाँ एक शिक्षा व्यवस्था दी और अपने यहाँ अलग किस्म क़ि शिक्षा व्यवस्था रखी है | हमारे यहाँ शिक्षा में डिग्री का महत्व है और उनके यहाँ ठीक उल्टा है | मेरे पास ज्ञान है और मैं कोई अविष्कार करता हूँ तो भारत में पूछा जायेगा क़ि तुम्हारे पास कौन सी डिग्री है ? अगर नहीं है तो मेरे अविष्कार और ज्ञान का कोई मतलब नहीं है | जबकि उनके यहाँ ऐसा बिलकुल नहीं है आप अगर कोई अविष्कार करते हैं और आपके पास ज्ञान है लेकिन कोई डिग्री नहीं हैं तो कोई बात नहीं आपको प्रोत्साहित किया जायेगा | नोबेल पुरस्कार पाने के लिए आपको डिग्री की जरूरत नहीं होती है | हमारे शिक्षा तंत्र को अंग्रेजों ने डिग्री में बांध दिया था जो आज भी वैसे के वैसा ही चल रहा है | ये जो 30 नंबर का पास मार्क्स आप देखते हैं वो उसी शिक्षा व्यवस्था क़ि देन है, मतलब ये है क़ि आप भले ही

70 नंबर में फेल है लेकिन 30 नंबर लाये है तो पास हैं, ऐसा शिक्षा तंत्र से सिर्फ गदहे ही पैदा हो सकते हैं और यही अंग्रेज चाहते थे | आप देखते होंगे क़ि हमारे देश में एक विषय चलता है जिसका नाम है Anthropology | जानते है इसमें क्या पढाया जाता है ? इसमें गुलाम लोगों क़ि मानसिक अवस्था के बारे में पढाया जाता है | और ये अंग्रेजों ने ही इस देश में शुरू किया था और आज आज़ादी के 64 साल बाद भी ये इस देश के विश्वविद्यालयों में पढाया जाता है और यहाँ तक क़ि सिविल सर्विस की परीक्षा में भी ये चलता है |

इस संधि की शर्तों के हिसाब से हमारे देश में आयुर्वेद को कोई सहयोग नहीं दिया जायेगा मतलब हमारे देश की विद्या हमारे ही देश में ख़त्म हो जाये ये साजिस की गयी | आयुर्वेद को अंग्रेजों ने नष्ट करने का भरसक प्रयास किया था लेकिन ऐसा कर नहीं पाए | दुनिया में जितने भी पैथी हैं उनमे ये होता है क़ि पहले आप बीमार हों तो आपका इलाज होगा लेकिन आयुर्वेद एक ऐसी विद्या है जिसमे कहा जाता है क़ि आप बीमार ही मत पड़िए | आपको मैं एक सच्ची घटना बताता हूँ -जोर्ज वाशिंगटन जो क़ि अमेरिका का पहला राष्ट्रपति था वो दिसम्बर 1799 में बीमार पड़ा और जब उसका बुखार ठीक नहीं हो रहा था तो उसके डाक्टरों ने कहा क़ि इनके शरीर का खून गन्दा हो गया है जब इसको निकाला जायेगा तो ये बुखार ठीक होगा और उसके दोनों हाथों क़ि नसें डाक्टरों ने काट दी और खून निकल जाने की वजह से जोर्ज वाशिंगटन मर गया | ये घटना 1799 की है और 1780 में एक अंग्रेज भारत आया था और यहाँ से प्लास्टिक सर्जरी सीख के गया था | मतलब कहने का ये है क़ि हमारे देश का चिकित्सा विज्ञान कितना विकसित था उस समय | और ये सब आयुर्वेद की वजह से था और उसी आयुर्वेद को आज हमारे सरकार ने हाशिये पर पंहुचा दिया है |

इस संधि के हिसाब से हमारे देश में गुरुकुल संस्कृति को कोई प्रोत्साहन नहीं दिया जायेगा | हमारे देश के समृद्धि और यहाँ मौजूद उच्च तकनीक की वजह ये गुरुकुल ही थे | और अंग्रेजों ने सबसे पहले इस देश की गुरुकुल परंपरा को ही तोडा था, मैं यहाँ लार्ड मेकॉले की एक उक्ति को यहाँ बताना चाहूँगा जो उसने 2 फ़रवरी 1835 को ब्रिटिश संसद में दिया था, उसने कहा था “”I have traveled across the length and breadth of India and have not seen one person who is a beggar, who is a thief, such wealth I have seen in this country, such high moral values, people of such caliber, that I do not think we would ever conquer this country, unless we break the very backbone of this nation, which is her spiritual and cultural heritage, and, therefore, I propose that we replace her old and ancient ducation system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good and greater than their own, they will lose their self esteem, their ative culture and they will become what we want them, a truly dominated nation” |

गुरुकुल का मतलब हम लोग केवल वेद, पुराण,उपनिषद ही समझते हैं जो की हमारी मुर्खता है गर आज की भाषा में कहूं तो ये गुरुकुल जो होते थे वो सब के सब Higher Learning Institute हुआ करते थे | इस संधि में एक और खास बात है | इसमें कहा गया है क़ि अगर हमारे देश के (भारत के) अदालत में कोई ऐसा मुक़दमा आ जाये जिसके फैसले के लिए कोई कानून न हो इस देश में या उसके फैसले को लेकर संबिधान में भी कोई जानकारी न हो तो साफ़ साफ़ संधि में लिखा गया है क़ि वो सारे मुकदमों का फैसला अंग्रेजों के न्याय पद्धति के आदर्शों के आधार पर ही होगा, भारतीय न्याय पद्धति का आदर्श उसमे लागू नहीं होगा | कितनी शर्मनाक स्थिति है ये क़ि हमें अभी भी अंग्रेजों का ही अनुसरण करना होगा |

भारत में आज़ादी की लड़ाई हुई तो वो ईस्ट इंडिया कम्पनी के खिलाफ था और संधि के हिसाब से ईस्ट इंडिया कम्पनी को भारत छोड़ के जाना था और वो चली भी गयी लेकिन इस संधि में ये भी है क़ि ईस्ट इंडिया कम्पनी तो जाएगी भारत से लेकिन बाकि 126 विदेशी कंपनियां भारत में रहेंगी और भारत सरकार उनको पूरा संरक्षण देगी | और उसी का नतीजा है क़ि ब्रुक बोंड, लिप्टन, बाटा, हिंदुस्तान लीवर (अब हिंदुस्तान यूनिलीवर) जैसी 126 कंपनियां आज़ादी के बाद इस देश में बची रह गयी और लुटती रही और आज भी वो सिलसिला जारी है |

अंग्रेजी का स्थान अंग्रेजों के जाने के बाद वैसे ही रहेगा भारत में जैसा क़ि अभी (1946 में) है और ये भी इसी संधि का हिस्सा है | आप देखिये क़ि हमारे देश में, संसद में, न्यायपालिका में, कार्यालयों में हर कहीं अंग्रेजी, अंग्रेजी और अंग्रेजी है जब क़ि इस देश में 99% लोगों को अंग्रेजी नहीं आती है | और उन 1% लोगों क़ि हालत देखिये क़ि उन्हें मालूम ही नहीं रहता है क़ि उनको पढना क्या है और UNO में जा के भारत के जगह पुर्तगाल का भाषण पढ़ जाते हैं | प में से बहुत लोगों को याद होगा क़ि हमारे देश में आजादी के 50 साल बाद तक संसद में वार्षिक बजट शाम को 5:00 बजे पेश किया जाता था | जानते है क्यों ? क्योंकि जब हमारे देश में शाम के 5:00 बजते हैं तो लन्दन में सुबह के 11:30 बजते हैं और अंग्रेज अपनी सुविधा से उनको सुन सके और उस बजट की समीक्षा कर सके | इतनी गुलामी में रहा है ये देश | ये भी इसी संधि का हिस्सा है |
1939 में द्वितीय विश्व युद्ध शुरू हुआ तो अंग्रेजों ने भारत में राशन कार्ड का सिस्टम शुरू किया क्योंकि द्वितीय विश्वयुद्ध में अंग्रेजों को अनाज क़ि जरूरत थी और वे ये अनाज भारत से चाहते थे | इसीलिए उन्होंने यहाँ जनवितरण प्रणाली और राशन कार्ड क़ि शुरुआत क़ि | वो प्रणाली आज भी लागू है इस देश में क्योंकि वो इस संधि में है | और इस राशन कार्ड को पहचान पत्र के रूप में इस्तेमाल उसी समय शुरू किया गया और वो आज भी जारी है | जिनके पास राशन कार्ड होता था उन्हें ही वोट देने का अधिकार होता था | आज भी देखिये राशन कार्ड ही मुख्य पहचान पत्र है इस देश में |

अंग्रेजों के आने के पहले इस देश में गायों को काटने का कोई कत्लखाना नहीं था | मुगलों के समय तो ये कानून था क़ि कोई अगर गाय को काट दे तो उसका हाथ काट दिया जाता था | अंग्रेज यहाँ आये तो उन्होंने पहली बार कलकत्ता में गाय काटने का कत्लखाना शुरू किया, पहला शराबखाना शुरू किया, पहला वेश्यालय शुरू किया और इस देश में जहाँ जहाँ अंग्रेजों की छावनी हुआ करती थी वहां वहां वेश्याघर बनाये गए, वहां वहां शराबखाना खुला, वहां वहां गाय के काटने के लिए कत्लखाना खुला | ऐसे पुरे देश में 355 छावनियां थी उन अंग्रेजों के | अब ये सब क्यों बनाये गए थे ये आप सब आसानी से समझ सकते हैं | अंग्रेजों के जाने के बाद ये सब ख़त्म हो जाना चाहिए था लेकिन नहीं हुआ क्योंक़ि ये भी इसी संधि में है |

हमारे देश में जो संसदीय लोकतंत्र है वो दरअसल अंग्रेजों का वेस्टमिन्स्टर सिस्टम है | ये अंग्रेजो के इंग्लैंड क़ि संसदीय प्रणाली है | ये कहीं से भी न संसदीय है और न ही लोकतान्त्रिक है| लेकिन इस देश में वही सिस्टम है क्योंकि वो इस संधि में कहा गया है | और इसी वेस्टमिन्स्टर सिस्टम को महात्मा गाँधी बाँझ और वेश्या कहते थे (मतलब आप समझ गए होंगे) |

ऐसी हजारों शर्तें हैं | मैंने अभी जितना जरूरी समझा उतना लिखा है | मतलब यही है क़ि इस देश में जो कुछ भी अभी चल रहा है वो सब अंग्रेजों का है हमारा कुछ नहीं है | अब आप के मन में ये सवाल हो रहा होगा क़ि पहले के राजाओं को तो अंग्रेजी नहीं आती थी तो वो खतरनाक संधियों (साजिस) के जाल में फँस कर अपना राज्य गवां बैठे लेकिन आज़ादी के समय वाले नेताओं को तो अच्छी अंग्रेजी आती थी फिर वो कैसे इन संधियों के जाल में फँस गए | इसका कारण थोडा भिन्न है क्योंकि आज़ादी के समय वाले नेता अंग्रेजों को अपना आदर्श मानते थे इसलिए उन्होंने जानबूझ कर ये संधि क़ि थी | वो मानते थे क़ि अंग्रेजों से बढियां कोई नहीं है इस दुनिया में | भारत की आज़ादी के समय के नेताओं के भाषण आप पढेंगे तो आप पाएंगे क़ि वो केवल देखने में ही भारतीय थे लेकिन मन,कर्म और वचन से अंग्रेज ही थे | वे कहते थे क़ि सारा आदर्श है तो अंग्रेजों में, आदर्श शिक्षा व्यवस्था है तो अंग्रेजों की, आदर्श अर्थव्यवस्था है तो अंग्रेजों की, आदर्श चिकित्सा व्यवस्था है तो अंग्रेजों की, आदर्श कृषि व्यवस्था है तो अंग्रेजों की, आदर्श न्याय व्यवस्था है तो अंग्रेजों की, आदर्श कानून व्यवस्था है तो अंग्रेजों की | हमारे आज़ादी के समय के नेताओं को अंग्रेजों से बड़ा आदर्श कोई दिखता नहीं था और वे ताल ठोक ठोक कर कहते थे क़ि हमें भारत अंग्रेजों जैसा बनाना है | अंग्रेज हमें जिस रस्ते पर चलाएंगे उसी रास्ते पर हम चलेंगे | इसीलिए वे ऐसी मूर्खतापूर्ण संधियों में फंसे |

अगर आप अभी तक उन्हें देशभक्त मान रहे थे तो ये भ्रम दिल से निकाल दीजिये | और आप अगर समझ रहे हैं क़ि वो ABC पार्टी के नेता ख़राब थे या हैं तो XYZ पार्टी के नेता भी दूध के धुले नहीं हैं | आप किसी को भी अच्छा मत समझिएगा क्योंक़ि आज़ादी के बाद के इन 64 सालों में सब ने चाहे वो राष्ट्रीय पार्टी हो या प्रादेशिक पार्टी, प्रत्यक्ष या परोक्ष रूप से राष्ट्रीय स्तर पर सत्ता का स्वाद तो सबो ने चखा ही है | खैर ……………

तो भारत क़ि गुलामी जो अंग्रेजों के ज़माने में थी, अंग्रेजों के जाने के 64 साल बाद आज 2011 में जस क़ि तस है क्योंकि हमने संधि कर रखी है और देश को इन खतरनाक संधियों के मकडजाल में फंसा रखा है | बहुत दुःख होता है अपने देश के बारे जानकार और सोच कर | मैं ये सब कोई ख़ुशी से नहीं लिखता हूँ ये मेरे दिल का दर्द होता है जो मैं आप लोगों से शेयर करता हूँ |

ये सब बदलना जरूरी है लेकिन हमें सरकार नहीं व्यवस्था बदलनी होगी और आप अगर सोच रहे हैं क़ि कोई मसीहा आएगा और सब बदल देगा तो आप ग़लतफ़हमी में जी रहे हैं | कोई हनुमान जी, कोई राम जी, या कोई कृष्ण जी नहीं आने वाले | आपको और हमको ही ये सारे अवतार में आना होगा, हमें ही सड़कों पर उतरना होगा और और इस व्यवस्था को जड मूल से समाप्त करना होगा |

भगवान भी उसी की मदद करते हैं जो अपनी मदद स्वयं करता है |

ब्रिटेन की संसद द्वारा पास किये गए “भारत की आज़ादी का कानून-1947” की छायाप्रति संलग्न है- pdf Copy of “Indian Independance Act-1947” यह वही कानून जिसकी वजह से भारत का बटवारा हुआ और इसके बारे में हमें कभी भी नहीं बताया गया| इसमे साफ-साफ़ लिखा है कि इंडिया और पाकिस्तान ब्रिटेन की सत्ता के अधीन होंगे और इसी में लिखा है कि इन अधीन राज्यों का गठन 15 अगस्त-1947 को किया जायेगा| इसी के आधार पर “ट्रांसफर ऑफ़ पॉवर अग्रीमेंट” हुआ था जिस पर नेहरू और माउन्ट बेटन ने 14 अगस्त 1947 की रात को हस्ताक्षर किया था |

इस सच को सभी भारतियों तक पहुँचा कर अपना राष्ट्र धर्म निभाएं वन्देमातरम !

आपने स्वयं और अपने परिवार के लिए सब कुछ किया, देश के लिए भी कुछ करिये,

क्या यह देश सिर्फ उन्ही लोगो का है जो सीमाओं पर मर जाते हैं??? सोचिये….

On Muurti Pujaa

On Muurti Pujaa

(It is not idolatry or stone worship. –Skanda987)

Two articles below.

From: danu kumar dananjay_2@yahoo.com

 1) The philosophical schools like Advaita Vedanta, Vishishtha Advaita Vedanta , Dvaita Vedanta are started by great acharyas (prophets* sent by God and they were NOT limited as scholar) and they have written commentaries for Vedas and Upanishads, Bhagavad-gita, etc. They have not opposed idol worship. Then why it is opposed in the religions like Islam, Sikh, Arya Samaj, etc? There is a reason for this which you can find in point 3.

2) Fire is also a natural object (one of the pancha-mahabutas) like a murthi (prithvi tatva) and Yagna is supported in Vedas. So called murthi is a medium through worship of God is done just like in Yagna, the God is invited through fire. One of my friend had quoted from Brahma Sutra 1st adhyaya 1st paada about murthi pooja which Acharya Madhwa, one of the prophets of God has written a commentary as following:

For those who do yagnas God is realized in fire. For a yogi, God is realized in heart. For aprabudda (who is not very intelligent) God is realized in so called images or idols but for true intelligent person God is found everywhere.

So the so called murthi pooja is Vedic but it was perhaps followed for getting the blessing in a more easy way (or for those who cannot do Tapasya like Yogi).

3) The Puranas that recommend so called idol worship also condemns the type of idol worship in which does not worship the omnipresence aspect of God. Here is the verse from Bhagavatha which clarifies how idol worship should NOT to be:
“Man performs the farce, that is worshipping idols etc., abandoning me, who is eternally existent in all beings. One, who is deserting the all pervading me and is worshipping the idols, is pouring fat to the ash. I am not pleased in him, who disrespects his fellow beings, though he worships me in my idol form, with an assortment of materials. Until one feels me, the omniscient, residing in one’s heart, one has to worship me in idols, observing one’s Dharma.

[Sreemadbhagavathamritha – Third Skanda P. 124]
Here is the verse which clarifies what idol worship to be:
Atmanam tanmayan dhyayan Moorthim sampoojyayet harehe.
“The idol of Hari should be worshiped by divinely contemplating on the spirit (since The Lord is the controller of all energies, and the living entities are parts and parcels of one of the energies.). “[11:3:54]Here is another:
“Some people religiously perform Pooja on the idol. If they hurt others even when they pray, such prayers do not yield result.” [Ibid. seventh Skanda P. 340]
It is evident from the verses quoted above that the concept of idol worship was nothing like we think. To understand the scope of idol worship check http://answering-zakir-naik.orgfree.com/2012/01/when-idol-worship-of-hinduism-is-shirk/

4) The manuals of so called idol worship are called as Agamas. This is not considered as non-Vedic by any prophets or gurus perhaps till Daya-nanda Saraswathi. Of course, there is reason for this since more and more people were thinking that God is limited to idol and were believing in the omni-presence aspect of God. According to Agama scripture, God manifests Himself in five-fold forms: Para, Vyūha, Vibhava, Antaryamin, and Archa. The so called idols that Hindus worship is rightly called as Vigraha. Vigraha means one which influences (raham means same thing) in a special way (vi- stands for vishesha). There are many instances in which God has reacted with his devotees with the vigraha as the interface. Refer for more information about the science behind so called Vigraha-aradhane (loosely idol worship):

http://oldthoughts.wordpress.com/2009/05/29/meaning-of-vigraha-is-embodiment-not-idol/
http://answering-zakir-naik.orgfree.com/2012/01/introduction-to-idol-worship-in-hinduism/

5) The Agamas state three essential requirements for a place of pilgrimage – Sthala, Teertham and Murthy. Sthala refers to the temple, Teertham, to the temple tank and Murthy to the deity(ies) worshipped. There are many instances or testimony in which the diseases or problems of the devotees are cured after visiting the temples or after doing pooja of certain deity or after bathing in a Teertha. This cannot be co-incidence or by chance since such miracles happening in such a large number means a possible one. Some of the well known miracles happening due to so called idol worship can be checked at http://answering-zakir-naik.orgfree.com/2012/02/miracles-of-vigraha-aradane-so-called-as-idol-worship/

5) There is Naga-natheshwara Linga near Begur, Bangalore which is known to have miraculous power. If anybody stands near the idol concentrating on God, you feel a force pulling you away. This has been tested by even Atheist and they have accepted this truth. There is similar kind of powerful Linga in Kanthavara (Udupi). A scientist who conducted research using a device in that temple found that there is huge amount of positive energy around this world which is due to none other than Linga. So the scholars know God only through books but devotees experience the power of God who knows about God much better than a scholar. They are blessed by God.

6) Read the following 2 verses from Shruthi:

” avidyanatho vidyathaha” = God is not someone who is knowable (fully by anyone), Apart from this, none has understood him. (Brihadaranyaka Upanishad 3 – 7 – 23 )

” Eko Avarno ” = It is difficult to describe God. ( Svetasvatara-Upanisad 4 – 1 )

This means God is not just limited to the description given in Shruthis like He has no form. God is beyond form. This means God can take any spiritual form He likes. Devotees know God better than a scholar.

Shiv Prakash

* I would not use the word ‘prophet’ for them. They were self-realized or vibhuutis empowered by God. Prophet word is used in the three Abrahamic religions.   – skanda987

From danu kumar: Thanks brother (skanda987)  for posting the article. Whatever I have written is not my own words. I have taken it from different websites.

==

Muurti Pujaa Stated in Scriptures

From: Raj Pandit

In Satyarth Prakash (samulla 11) it is stated that murtipuja is un-Vedic and started with the advent of Jainism; this could not be further from the truth. In fact, the worship of mUrtIs is well documented and mentioned in Veda Samhita such as:

अर्चत प्रार्चत प्रियमेधासो अर्चत।

arcata prArcata priyamedhAso arcata | Rig VIII.69.7

“Oh enlightened ones, perform pooja (arca) to the pratima; worship it properly.” The word “arca” in veda only means adoration to a deity in the form of a murti. Had it meant agnihotra/havan then “yaj” would have been used; similarly if it had inferred simply ‘to praise’ then upAsanA is the correct word as in the mantra “ya AtmadA baladA yasya vishva upAsate..”.

Veda itself tells us that Brahman has two forms, the subtle and the manifest which is concrete (mUrtI):

द्वे वाव ब्राह्मणो रूपे मूर्तम् च अमूर्तम् च।

dve vAva brAhmaNo rUpe mUrtam ca amUrtam ca | bRhadAranyaka 2.3

Our itishAs such as Ramayan and Mahabharat describe the presence of the pradhAna kalasham and other kalashas in all yajnas which are the focal point and embodiment of the devata for whom the yajna is consecrated. The kalashas are first established and worshipped (through puja) prior to conducting Havan.

The kalasha is the embodiment  (mUrti) of all the devatAs and it is described as such by shruti:

कलशस्य मुखे विष्णु कंठे रूद्राः समाश्रीताः

मूले तत्र स्थितो ब्रह्मा मध्ये मातृगणाः स्मृताः।

कुक्षौदु सागराः सर्वे सप्त द्वीपाव वसुन्धराः

ऋग्वेदोत यजुर्वेदः सामवेदोभ्य अथर्वणः॥

अंगैश्च सहिताः सर्वे कलशाम्बु समाश्रिताः॥

kalashasya mukhe vishNu, kanThe rUdrAH samAshrItAH mUle tatra sthito brahmA madhye mAtRgaNAH smRtAH kukshaudu sAgarAH sarve sapta dvIpAva vasundarAH Rgvedota yajurvedaH sAmavedObhya atharvaNaH angaishcha sahitAH sarve kalashhAmbu saMAshhritAH
Vishnu resides in the mouth and the Rudras in the neck of the vessel. At the nethermost is Brahma and in the middle are the (water) devis Kukshaudu. seas All seven islands on this earth Rig, Yajur, Sama, Atharvana vedas with all vedAngas are present in the water in the vessel.

We invariably observe in Havans performed by Arya Samaj ritvik four metal glasses containing water are placed around the Havan kund representing varuNa devatA (water deity). The presence of the pAnca-tatva (five elements) is an essential element of any yajna.

Archaeological evidence unearthed from the ancient settlement of Harappa dated to before 3300BCE clearly demonstrates that the Shiva linga was worshiped by the civilization of this era usually in the form of a short cylindrical pillar with a rounded top. It had no functional use other than an object of veneration. This further demonstrates that murtipuja existed well before the Jain period as wrongly stated in Satyarth Prakash.

It is suggested for further proof of early murtipuja that one should refer to the records of ancient visitors to India such as Cyrus of Persia or for example in the Chronicles of Megasthenes, Arrian (Greeks) or Demetrius of Bactria which describe in depth the existence of temples with murtis and the worship of these in the aforementioned method (i.e. Puja/Archana). Even our own iconic scholars such as Vishnugupta (Chanakya) have recorded the worship of murtis through puja existing many thousands of years prior to the advent of Mahavir and Jainism.

The recent discovery of the ancient city of dvArakA off the west coast of India in the Bay of Cambay dates back to the dvApar-yuga and has been dated to before the last ice-age which clearly pre-dates the advent of jains.

The references to archana or puja of Shiva linga and other murtis through the pouring of libations and application of sandalwood etc. in Ramayan, Bhagvat and Mahabharata are legion and some examples are quoted here: Once again kindly note that the verb “arca” is a specific reference to this kind of worship (i.e. puja) as opposed to “yajna”.

In this citation Bhagavan Shri Ram is showing Mata Sita Devi the Tirtham (place of pilgrimage) where he had worshipped Bhagavan Shiva:

अत्र पूर्वम् महादेवः प्रसादम्-अकरोत् विभुः।

एतत् दृष्यते तीर्थम् सागरस्य महात्मनः॥

सेतुबन्ध इति ख्यातम् त्रैलोक्येन च पूजितम्॥

Atra pUrvam MahAdevah prasAdam-akarot vibhuh/

Etat dRshyate tIrtham SAgarasya mahAtmanah//

Setubandh iti khyAtam Trailokyena ch pUjitam / Ramayan 6:123:20-21

Satyarth Prakash wrongly states that Rameshvaram was not a place of worship for Shiva (Mahadeva) prior to Shri Ram’s arrival and that a King of the South named Rama had erected the mandir later. The use of the word “tIrtham” by Shri Rama Chandra ji to describe this spot in Ramayan proves that it was already a well established place of pilgrimage (i.e. tIrtham).

In these quotes from Ramayan, Ravana’s puja through murtis is clearly related:

यत्र यत्र च याति स्म रावणो राक्षसेवरः।

जाम्बूनद् मयम् लिंगम् तत्र तत्र स्म नीयते॥

Yatra yatra ch yAti sma rAvaNo rAkshasevarah/

jAmbUnadmayam lingam tatra tatra sma nIyate// 7:31:12

क्रुत्-उदक शुचिर्-भूत्वा काले हुत्-हुताश्णः।

देवागारम् जगामाशु पुन्यम्-इक्ष्वाकु-सेवितम् ।

तत्र देवा पित्रुन् विप्रान् अर्चयित्वा यथा-विधिः॥

Krut-udaka, shuchir-bhUtvA, kAle hut-hutAshnah,

devAgAram jagAmAshu punyam-ikshvAku-sevitam/

Tatra devA, pitrun, viprAn archayitvA yathA-vidhih// 7:37:13-14

Bhagvatam relates in 10.22 that the puja of Mata Durga Murti in Temples (Katyayani Devi) and fasting was prevalent among Shri Krishna’s kula of Vraj :

हेमन्ते प्रथमे मासि नंद-व्रज-कमारिकाः।

चेरुर् हविष्यं भुंजानाः कात्यायन्य-अर्चन-व्रतम्॥१॥

आप् लुत्यांभसि कालिन्द्या जलान्ते चोदिते रुणे।

कृत्वा प्रतिकृतिम् देवीम् आनर्चुर् नृप सैकतीम्॥२॥

गंधैर् माल्यैः सुरभिभिर् बलिभिर् धूप-दीपकैः।

उच्चावचैश् चोपहारैः प्रवाल-फल-तण्डुलैः॥३॥

hemante prathame mAsi nanda-vraja-kamArikAH |

cherur haviShyaM bhunjAnAH kAtyAyany-archana-vratam ||1||

AplutyAMbhasi kAlindyA jalAnte chodite ‘ruNe |

kRtvA pratikRtiM devīm Anarchur nRpa saikatIm ||2||

gandhair mAlyaiH surabhibhir balibhir dhUpa-dīpakaiH |

ucchAvacaish chopahAraiH pravAla-phala-taNDulaiH ||3||

Further evidence in Bhagvat of murti puja is found after Shri Krishna Maharaj destroys Narakasur and saves the 16,000 damsels, Narada Muni visits Shri Krishna Bhagavan in Dvaraka (vide 10.69) and relates Shri Krishna’s multiple leela and describes charming devalaya/ mandirs/ temples (ruchiram suralayaih) and Bhagvan participating in many pujas with his patnis:

In Mahabharata there are many episodes describing murtipuja (archana):

शरण्यम् शरणम् गत्वा भगवंतम् पिनाकिनम् ।

म्रुण्-मयम् स्थंदिलम् कृत्वा माल्येन-अपूजयद् भवम् ॥

अर्चितानि च सर्वानि देवता-आयतनानिन् च ।

देवता-आयतनानो च पूजाः सुविविधास्-तथा ॥

Sharanyam sharanam gatvA bhagavantam PinAkinam/

Mrun-mayam sthandilam krutvA mAlyena-apUjayad bhavam// Vana Parva 19:65

ArchitAni ch sarvAni devatA-AyatanAnin ch/ Vana 75:8

DevatA-AyatanAno ch pUjAh suvividhAs-tathA / Ashva. 70:16

The ancient Shiva temple of Katasraj (KatAka-sheela) near Saain da Choh district Chakwal, Pakistan where the infamous encounter of the Pandava with the Yaksha ensued related in the Mahabharata and the lake along with the Shiva temple have been there prior to the visit of the Pandavas.

We would point out that murtipuja was prevalent in the early part of Creation, that is, in Satya Yuga and this is ratified through the ancient epics of Bhakta Dhruva and Bhakta Prahlad. After all did not Prahlad refuse to worship his father Hiranyakashipu as God and clung to his murti of Shri Vishnu Narayan? Even Shri Krishna Maharaj mentions in Bhagavad Gita that “prahalAdash-chAsmi daityAnAm” (10.30) that among the Daityas he is Bhakta Prahlad. One can still see the ruins of the famous mandir in Prahaladpura in the southern subrbs of modern day Multan now in Pakistan.

More than this- let us not forget our great Kings such as Ambarish of the Ikshvaku dynasty who were ardent devotees of Lord Vishnu and built many temples in his honour. Maharaja Ambarish engaged daily in the puja of Shri Bhagvan’s murti, in the cleaning of his temples etc. He relished visiting temples of Shri Hari and taking darshan of his divine murtis. Maharaj Ambarish kept the fast of Ekadashi,Dvadashi for one year with his Queen and the fast (vrat) of Kartik Maas.

Here are the scriptural evidences from Bhagvatam 9.4 :

करौ हरेर् मंदिरम् आर्जनादिषु  ।१८।

मुकुन्द लिंगालय दर्शने ।१९।

अरि राधयिषुः कृष्णम् महिष्या तुल्य शीलया।

युक्तः सांवत्सरं वीरो दधार द्वादशि व्रतम् ॥२९॥

karau harermandiramArjanAdiShu… |18|

mukundalingAlayadarshane…|19|

ArirAdhayiShuH kRShNaM mahiShyA tulyashīlayA |
yuktaH sAMvatsaraM veero dadhAra dvAdashivratam ||29||

We see here that Maharaj Ambarish undertook the mahabhishekam (bathing with milk, honey, curd etc.) of the pratima of Shri Vishnu, dressed the murti, offered flowers and other puja materials:

 महाभिषेक विधिना सर्वोपस् कर सम्पदा।

अभिषिच्याम् बराकल्पैर् गन्धमाल्यार् हणादिभिः॥ ३१॥

तद् गतन्तर भावेन पूजयामास केशवम् ।

ब्राह्मणांश्च महाभागान् सिद्धार्थान् अपि भक्तितः॥३२॥

mahAbhiShekavidhinA sarvopaskarasampadA |
abhiShichyAmbarAkalpairgandhamAlyArhaNAdibhiH || 31||
tadgatntarabhAvena pUjayAmAsa keshavam
brAhmaNAMshcha mahAbhAgAn siddhArthAn api bhaktitaH ||32||

It is most disenchanting that purported Hindus in this very forum would happily allow these remaining evidences to be destroyed like the Bamiyan Buddhas in Afghanistan so that they can further their argument that mUrti-puja never existed before the Jains.

In conclusion, to assert that murti puja is only two-three thousand years old and was not prevalent in Vedic times is the height of ignorance and the greatest of untruths. In light of these glaring evidences any discerning and intelligent Hindu would reject this canard being repeatedly spread by some within this august forum. We know that murti puja has been part and parcel of our Dharma since time immemorial and it is not un-Vedic.

Kind regards

Dr Raj Pandit Sharma

President

Hindu Priest Association (UK)

 Email: rsharma@hindupriestassociation.org

General Secretary

National Council of Hindu Temples UK

Tel: 078 5032 0050

Email: secretary@nchtuk.org

www.nchtuk.org

Jewish Boycott

From: Deva Samaroo

dear all
an interesting article read and pass on please
deva

Jewish Boycott

Well done:
This may end the Muslim problems….

A short time ago, Iran ‘s Supreme Leader Grand Ayatollah Ali Khamenei urged the Muslim World to boycott anything and everything that originates with the Jewish people.

In response, Meyer M. Treinkman, a pharmacist, out of the kindness of his heart, offered to assist them in their boycott as follows:

“Any Muslim who has Syphilis must not be cured by Salvarsan discovered by a Jew, Dr. Ehrlich. He should not even try to find out whether he has Syphilis, because the

Wasserman Test is the discovery of a Jew. If a Muslim suspects that he has Gonorrhea, he must not seek diagnosis, because he will be using the method of a Jew named Neissner.

“A Muslim who has heart disease must not use Digitalis, a discovery by a Jew, Ludwig Traube.

Should he suffer with a toothache, he must not use Novocaine, a discovery of the Jews, Widal and Weil.

If a Muslim has Diabetes, he must not use Insulin, the result of research by Minkowsky, a Jew. If one has a headache, he must shun Pyramidon and Antypyrin, due to the Jews, Spiro and Ellege.

Muslims with convulsions must put up with them because it was a Jew, Oscar Leibreich, who proposed the use of Chloral Hydrate.

Arabs must do likewise with their psychic ailments because Freud, father of psychoanalysis, was a Jew.

Should a Muslim child get Diphtheria, he must refrain from the “Schick” reaction which was invented by the Jew, Bella Schick.

“Muslims should be ready to die in great numbers and must not permit treatment of ear and brain damage, work of Nobel Prize winner, Robert Baram.

They should continue to die or remain crippled by Infantile Paralysis because the discoverer of the anti-polio vaccine is a Jew, Jonas Salk.

Muslims must refuse to use Streptomycin and continue to die of Tuberculosis because a Jew, Zalman Waxman, invented the wonder drug against this killing disease.

Muslim doctors must discard all discoveries and improvements by dermatologist Judas Sehn Benedict, or the lung specialist, Frawnkel, and ofmany other world renowned Jewish scientists and medical experts.

“In short, good and loyal Muslims properly and fittingly should remain afflicted with Syphilis, Gonorrhea, Heart Disease, Headaches, Typhus, Diabetes, Mental Disorders, Polio Convulsions and Tuberculosis and be proud to obey the Islamic boycott.”

Meanwhile I ask, what medical contributions to the world have Muslims made?

Only one I can think of is … Trouble !!!

The Importance of the Cow in Vedic Culture

The Importance of the Cow in Vedic Culture

By Subramanian Swamy

Our West-influenced intellectuals sneer at the mention of the cow. The same intellectuals first sneered at yoga. Now it is a fashion to do pranayama at cocktail parties the arguments in the West for cow slaughter are no more uncontested. They also sneered at our sanyasis as ‘godmen’. Now they flock to ashrams with their white friends ever since the Beatles. Who knows, they may soon have a cow in their backyards.
India has 150 million cows, each of them giving an average of less than 200 litres of milk per year. If they could be fed and looked after, they can give 11,000 litres, as Israeli cows do. That would provide milk for the whole world. The milk we produce today is the cheapest in the world. With enhanced production we could become the world’s largest exporter of milk and it could be India’s biggest foreign exchange earner.

For those of us who are desi by pedigree and conviction, I place some facts about the cow in the perspective of modern Hindutva.

The cow was elevated to divinity in the Rig Veda. In Book VI, Hymn XXVIII attributed to Rishi Bhardwaja extols the virtue of the cow. In Atharva Veda (Book X, Hymn X), the cow is formally designated as Vishnu, and `all that the Sun surveys’.

Indian society has addressed the cow as gow mata. The Churning of the Sea episode brings to light the story of the creation of the cow. Five divine Kamadhenus (wish cows), viz, Nanda, Subhadra, Surabhi, Sushila, Bahula emerged in the churning.

Thousands of names in our country are cow-related: Gauhati, Gorakhpur, Goa, Godhra, Gondiya, Godavari, Goverdhan, Gautam, Gomukh, Gokarna, Goyal, Gochar etc.

They signify reverence for the cow, and our abiding faith that the cow is Annapurna.

In 2003, the National Commission on Cattle under Justice G. M. Lodha submitted its recommendations to the NDA government. The report called for stringent laws to protect the cow and its progeny in the interest of the rural economy, a constitutional requirement under Directive Principles of State Policy. Article 48 of the Constitution says: `The State shall endeavour to organise agriculture and animal husbandry on modern and scientific lines and shall, in particular, take steps for preserving and improving the breeds, and prohibiting the slaughter of cows and calves and other milch and draught cattle’. During the First War of Independence in 1857, when Bahadur Shah `Zafar’ was installed as emperor by the Hindus in Delhi for a brief period, his Hindu prime minister, on the emperor’s proclamation, made cow killing a capital offence. In Maharaja Ranjit Singh’s kingdom, the only crime that invited capital punishment was cow slaughter.

The cow, according to the Vedas, provides four products for human use: (i) Godugdha (cow milk): As per Ayurveda, cow milk has fat, carbohydrates, minerals and Vitamin B, and even a capacity for body resistance to radiation and for regenerating brain cells. (ii) Goghruta (ghee): The best ghee, it is, as per Ayurveda useful in many disorders. In yajna, it improves the air’s oxygen level. (iii) Gomutra (urine): Eight types of urine are used for medicinal purpose nowadays, among which cow urine is held to be the best. The Americans are busy patenting it. It has anti-cancer, anti-bacterial, anti-fungal and antioxidant properties.

It has immune-modulator properties, which makes it useful for immune deficiency diseases. In the classics there are many references to cow urine as a drug of choice. Even the Parsis follow this practice.

Lastly, (iv), Gomaya (dung) is considered as valuable as Gomutra and used to purify the environment, as it has radium and checks radiation effects.

Ancient Hindu wisdom on the medicinal properties of cow urine is borne out by two patents granted in the US for cow urine distillate (Patent numbers 6410059 and 6896907).

Even China has granted the distillate a patent as a DNA protector. A global patent has been granted for cow urine, neem and garlic as a pest repellent and for fungicidal and growth promoting properties for different crops (WHO 2004/ 087618A1). A US patent has been granted for strains from Sahiwal cow milk for plant growth promoter phytopathogenic fungi controlling activity, abiotic stress tolerating capability, phosphatic solubilisation capability, etc. And CSIR has filed for a US patent for amrit pani, a mixture of cow dung, cow urine and jiggery, for soil health improvement properties.

These claims were initially made in the Charaka Samhita, Sushrut, Vaghbhati and Nighantu, Ratnakar, etc. They prove the utility of cow dung and urine for sustainable agriculture as well as for disease prevention.

The arguments in the West for cow slaughter are no more uncontested. There are better sources of protein than beef. Any dietician’s chart shows that beef with 22 per cent protein ranks below soya-bean (43), groundnut (31) and pulses (24 per cent). One kilogram of beef takes seven kg of crops and 7,000 kg of water to produce.

Thus cow protection makes economic and ecological sense. Swami Dayananda Saraswati, convenor of the Hindu Dharma Acharya Sabha, has argued that non-vegetarianism indirectly contributes heavily to greenhouse gases and other pollution.

He quotes a UN report from 2006 that says, “Raising animals for meat as food generates more greenhouse gases than all the cars and trucks in the world combined”. Ten of billions of animals farmed for food release gases such as methane, nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide through their massive amounts of manure. “The released methane”, the report says, “has 23 times the global warming potential of CO2”. For these animals to graze, virgin forests are cleared. The livestock industry also needs vast stretches of land to raise mono-crops to feed the animals. The CO2 that the trees and plants store escapes into the air when they are destroyed.

Growing fodder implies heavy use of synthetic fertilizers produced with fossil fuels.

While this process emits a huge amount of CO2, the fertilizer itself releases nitrous oxide (3) — a greenhouse gas that is 296 times more potent than CO2. Alarming though these facts are, all that people have to do is to avoid red meat. There will be no need to breed millions of animals for daily slaughter. The animal population will consequently decline.

A single individual by not consuming meat prevents the equivalent of 1.5 tonnes of CO2 emissions in a year. This is more than the one tonne of CO 2 prevented by switching from a large sedan to a small car.

So there are a number of reasons to be a vegetarian. People who eat meat think a pure vegetarian diet is optional. But now they have no choice if they are alive to what is happening to this life-bearing planet. There is no justification for eating meat, given the devastating consequences for the planet.

A new fervour for a cow renaissance is necessary. It is constitutional (for India) and we should defend it with all our might.

About The Author; Subramanian Swamy is a former Union minister.

 

http://epaper.expressbuzz.com/NE/NE/2009/11/21/ArticleHtmls/21_11_2009_010_003.shtml?Mode=1

http://expressbuzz.com/Opinion/Op-Ed/save-the-cow-save-earth/123392.html