Category: Articles

Why Hindustan Must Be Made a Hindu Nation

Why Hindustan Must Be Made a Hindu Nation

By Suresh Vyas

 

Hindu nationalism is based on the Sanaatan Dharma as is originally provided in the Veda. The Veda provides complete Spiritual Science (अध्यात्म ज्ञान). Living in accordance with this science a person advances spiritually. That means that the person living per Dharma lives more and more sin-free. One’s sin-free living cannot be a problem for anyone. For, example, all or Hindu festivals or samskaar vidhis are sin-free and eco-friendly.

—

Dharma is only one: Sanaatan Dhharma, also known as Verna-aashra, Dharma, Vedic Dharma, or Hindu Dharma. Unlike the three Abrahamic religions the Dharma is all-inclusive.

—

The cradle of the Vedic civilization is Hindustan or Aaryvarta or Bharatvrsha.

—

To practice Dharma one needs clean environment free from terrorism or fear or any danger. One needs a a healthy body to practice Dharma to advance spiritually and realize one’s aatma or God, Param-aatmaa, whom I call Bhagavaan Krishna. Hindustan is home land of all the Hindus of the world. Hindu is not a race. Aaryan is not a race. Anyone who stives to live per Dharma is an a Aarya or Aryan. Therefore, you will see that there are disciples of Sri Prabhupada from all different races. They all can be called Hindus. the Krishna devotees.

—

Just as you a Hindu ensure all in family live per Dharma and no anti-Hindu ideology or majahab enters your home; you Hindus needs to ensure that no anti-Hindu, anti-Dharma ideology should remain in Hindustan, your home land. Islaam, Xianity, and Communism are anti- Hindu, anti-Dharma who take away the peace the Hindu’s need to practice Dharma and advance spiritually. Therefore, Hindustan must be declared a Hindu State where all the anti-national and anti-Vedic ideologies will be banned. If it is not done, then there will not remain a Hindu in Hindustan.

—

Sure, there is commonality between between snakes and humans as we Hindus know, but that does not mean we allow the snakes to live with us and allow them the bite us and kill us. The Kauravas and the Pandavas were cousins (as the Hindustani Muslims and all Hindus are) but that does not mean the Pandavas have to tolerate sufferings caused by the Kauravas, the adharmis and asuras. Therefore, there was Mahabharat War – धर्मयुद्ध.

 

So, the Hindus need to save Hindustan they remain active to maintain terrorism free environment in which they can practice Dharma. When the house is on fire, or you see a tsunami is coming to you, you cannot practice any yog or do any saadhanaa, pujaa or yagna.

So, धर्मयुद्ध has priority currently than anything else.

—

If anyone comes to preach you ahimsaa, tell them to preach it to the Muslims of Hindustan.

You Hindus keep arms at home and with you always. The asursa do it, and you want to win over them.

—

jaya sri krishna!

hinduunation.com

महाराज जी ने खोल दी सबकी पोल,बड़े बड़े कथावाचक हो गए शर्मिंदा #kathavachak #rajendradasjimaharaj

 

 

On the Judges who Judge in Dharmic Matters

On the Judges who Judge Monks and Saadhus.

Technically, a secular constitution has no jurisdiction on deciding how a Hindu saadhu should behave or not behave because each has (has to have) a spiritual master whom each saadhu us surrendered. They are a part of the Hindu/Vedic society, and they control their senses much more than a common citizen does. They are spiritual guides for the society, even for politicians; and some are protectors of Dharma as well.

Many saadus do nishkaam bhakti karma to please God or their guru or for the society. To do that bhakti seva, they do need resources and money. Therefore, the Hindus and the courts need to understand this point and do not make any judgements out of the ignorance of dharma practice.

To judge a Hindu saadhu, the court need to invite the head guru of the math or sampradaya to which the saadnu belongs, and take advise from the head guru before making any judgement. This process is the same as in worldly affairs, that when a court/judge is not competent in the matter of a judgement, they invite neutral experts to provide them information that helps to make a right judgement.

Also remember that a naga saadhu or a sanyaasi considers him/herself as a dead person in worldly affairs. He simply lives for his and the society’s spiritual uplifting. Being so he does not fear death or injuries. He is guided by noble spiritual goals for his and nation’s life. Also, he could be ferocious fighter alone or in group. Just as Shaolin monks are respected by Buddhists, the Hindus and all should respect Hindu saadhus and sanyasis.

The courts/judges in the past have opened courts in the middle of night, out of fear from the terrorists, just to serve the terrorists and anti-nationals. That is wrong and cowardice. In contrast, it is noble to quickly provide justice to saadhus and naga saadhus and nihangas because they live to uphold Dharma, Sanaatan Dharma that is universal religion for mankind.

To see the Hindu Dharma and other Abrahamic religions in the same category is as wrong as seeing a coconut and a poisonous fruit in the same category. The judges need to understand this point well, and so the Hindus.

— Now the other argument by the judges at this time is that they have to treat all the religions and dharma in the same way. That means the constitution is defective and anti-majority, and so anti-Hindu. Therefore, the  Hindus law-makers need to fix this issue as soon as possible. –

Hindustan was divided in 1949 due to the threat from Islam that has forcibly invaded in Hindustan 1000 years ag when we gave land, treasury, and army to islaam for peace. Thenafter, by default the rest of the Hindustan is a Hindu State; so it officially needs to be declared so where all the anti-Vedic ideologies or majhabs will be illegal.

Why keep Islaam legal in Hindustan when islaam divided the nation?? —

The word “secular” was illegally inserted in the constitution in Indira’s emergency time without any democratic due process. Forcing “secularism’ on Hindus is like painting sky blue. Which is not needed because a Hindu is inherently respectful to all faiths that respect Hindu Dharma and culture.

The anti-Hindu Congress also removed pictures of Hindu Gods from the constitution illegal; so these pictures need to be inserted back in the constitution. Bottom Line: Hindustan has been the home nation for millenniums and the Hindus have the birthright to dominate over internal anti-Dharma and anti-national forces.

॥ वयम् राष्ट्रे जागृयाम् ॥

jaya sri krtishna!

J&k में जिहाdiयों के गढ़ कश्मीर को फ्रॉड परिसीमन के आधार पर अधिक सीटें दे रही हैं भाजपा सरकार !

 

 

Sita Ram Goel on Sufism

Sita Ram Goel on Sufism:

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5Z4PHMYvyI

A comment by @ShivaKanda

 

  1. The obsession of Hindus with Ajmer, Chishtiya cult and Sufis in general is very unhealthy. Some professors (from JNU and other universities) have built their career by whitewashing the history of Sufis in India and continue to do so.

 

  1. Sita Ram Goel had warned in 1985 that this fatal love of Hindus for Sufis will be their ruin. It is Hindus who have kept the Sufi tradition alive in India by visiting and donating to Ajmer as well as most other dargahs, a tradition which has always wanted to convert them.

 

  1. He has also warned about the absurdity of Hindu professors and academicians sitting in India’s top universities and singing paeans about Ajmer and other Sufi orders in India. They are doing a great disservice by confusing Hindus about the real nature/intent of Sufism.

 

  1. Sita Ram Goel says in ‘Muslim Separatism’: “Many Hindus have been misled, mostly by their own ‘soft-headed scholars’ to cherish the fond belief that the Sufis were spiritual seekers, and that unlike the Mullahs, they loved Hindu religious lore and liked their Hindu neighbors.”

 

  1. “The Chishtiya Sufis in particular have been chosen for such fulsome praise.” He says. We can see this deplorable trend even now when professors from JNU keep whitewashing the fanatic and barbaric record of the Sufi orders, particularly the Chishtiya order.

 

  1. These Sufi orders were fanatic since the beginning. An Islamic scholar Aziz Ahmad says: “In Indian sufism, anti-Hindu polemics began with Muinuddin Chishti. Early Sufis in Punjab and early Chishtis devoted themselves to the task of conversion on a large scale.”

 

  1. Nizamuddin Auliya is championed as a great spiritual figure. He actually thought that Hindus could not get Allah’s grace and could not be easily converted until they were in the company of some Muslim fakirs and saints for a long time and only then conversion would follow.

 

  1. This is very crucial. Sufism is a front to convert Hindus who are given to reverence for anything which even remotely sounds spiritual. It is their strength, but also their weakness. The early attacks of Islam in India established that defeating and converting Hindus is not easy.

 

  1. Thus Islamic scholars came up with a plan. They started imitating and mimicking Hindu sadhus. Muslim fakirs and Sufis started imitating the guru tradition of Hindus and copied Vedantic philosophy, imitating it in songs and popular literature.

 

  1. However, the core of Islamic fundamentalism was never changed. Sufism was a cover for military Islam, nothing else. This can be traced from their ideology and their practice. They existed to fool Hindus about a spiritual core in Islam and thus convert them.

 

  1. Amir Khusro and Ziauddin Barani were disciples of Auliya but were deeply fanatic. “Both of them express a great hatred for Hindus, and regret that the Hanafi school of Islamic Law had come in the way of completely wiping out the curse of infidels from the face of Hindustan.”

 

  1. Chishtiya order in Ajmer is not the only Sufi order which was Islamic fundamentalist in nature. Ahmad Sirhindi (1564-1624) was another Sufi who had great influence on India. He wrote many letters to powerful courtiers in the reign of Akbar and Jehangir.

 

  1. In letter No. 163 he wrote: “The honour of Islam lies in insulting kufr and kafirs. One who respects the kafirs dishonours the Muslims.” It is brought to us by Islamic scholar S. A. A. Rizvi. Similarly, Sirhindi writes the real reason of implementing Jizyah on Hindu:

 

  1. “The real purpose of levying jiziya on them is to humiliate them to such an extent that they may not be able to dress well and to live in grandeur. They should constantly remain terrified. It is intended to hold them under contempt and to uphold the honour and might of Islam.”

 

  1. It was Sufi Ahmad Sirhindi who reinvigorated the fundamentalist Islam in India after it had been softened by Akbar during his rule. Abul Kalam Azad wrote that it was Sirhindi who wrote letters to all Muslim nobles in India to keep following orthodox Islam.

 

  1. Sirhindi taught them not to believe the soft agenda of Akbar. He instructed that to hate Hindus, to sacrifice cows, is the noble duty of a true Muslim. Without this new life given to fundamentalist Islam in India, Aurangzeb wouldn’t have found curry with Muslim nobles.

 

  1. Sufis in India have always been the covert soldiers of fundamentalist Islam. ALL Sufi orders trace their spiritual lineage to the Prophet. Just like the Shariat, the Islamic law, the source of all Sufism is once again the deeds and words of the Prophet.

 

  1. This proves that all the claim of Sufi being the ‘spiritual’ sect of Islam is completely wrong. They have learned to imitate Vedanta in lofty poetry. But the loftiness never goes to any higher place because any higher philosophy is blasphemy for orthodox Islam.

 

  1. The point here is: all the four forms/ orders of Sufi cult (Chishtiya, Suhrawardi, Qadiri, Naqsbandi) have an agenda against non-Muslims, similar to any Islamic invader. They consider Hindu way of life and worship as Kufr and want to convert all Hindus to Islam.

 

  1. The Sufis have managed to attain some small ‘siddhis’ (tricks/attainments they claim as God given gifts) and that is how they are able to fool and attract Hindu devotees, but that’s the story for another thread. For now, beware of ‘soft-headed professors’ whitewashing the seamier side of Sufi history.

 

॥श्रद्धा – अंध श्रद्धा के बारे मे॥

 

॥श्रद्धा – अंध श्रद्धा के बारे मे॥

by Suresh Vyas

 

जहां पांच इन्द्रियां और अपनी बुद्धि व तर्क से नहि समझा जाता उसको सत्य मानना वो श्रद्धा है।  कोई अन्य व्यक्ति को वो अन्ध श्रद्धा लग शकती है। और जिसको आज एक बात में श्रद्धा है उसको बादमे ज्ञान व समज भी हो शकती है कि वो उसकी अन्ध श्रद्धा थी , और ये भी ज्ञान हो शकता है कि जो उसकी श्रद्धा थी वो सत्य है।

 

नास्तिक लोग दो प्रकार के होते है। एक वो है जिन्हों ने ठान किया है कि भगवान नहि है। उनको भगवान होने का कुछ भी प्रमाण दो वो मानेगे नहि और विवाद करते रहेन्गे। दूसरे नास्तिक वो है जो भगवान को देख ले या कोई चमत्कार का अनुभव कर लें तो मान जायेन्गे कि भगवान है।

 

भगवद् गीता मे कृष्ण भगवान ने अपने बारेमे बहूत बताया है। वो ही भगवान सबके हृदय मे परमात्मा के नामसे है और वो जीव-आत्मा के सब विचार इच्छा व कर्म को देख रहा है। ये भगवान के गुणधर्म व कर्म-लीला सामान्य मनुष्य की समज से बाहर है। जै से की :-

 

भगवान सदा है। ना उसका जन्म है ना उसका मरण है। सारे विश्व या ब्रह्माण्ड का नाश हो जाने के बाद भी भगवान रहता है। भगवान सर्वज्ञ है, सर्वव्यापी है, सर्व शक्तिमान है ,परमकृपालु है, साकर है, और कोई भी आकार ले शकते है। वो एक ही समय बहूत स्थान पर प्रगट हो शकते है। भगवानकी गति को कोई रोक नहि शकता।  भबवान प्रकृति के आधीन नहि है बल्कि प्रकृति भगवान के आधीन है। कर्म के बन्धन भगवान को नहि है।

 

कोई सामन्य मनुष्य भगवान जैसा नहि है। कोई बडे सन्त साधू योगी को भगवान कुछ सिद्धि देते है। जो लोग मानते है कि कोई चमत्कार नहि होते है वो सच जानने के लिये पण्डित दिरेन्द्र कृष्ण शास्त्री के दरबार म जाये और सीधा अनुभव कर लो भगवान क्या होता है। भगवान भूत भविष्य व वर्तमान सब कुछ जानता है।

 

तो कोई ये मानता है कोई नहि मानता है।  भगवान ने सब को क्या शोचना क्या मानना वो आझादी दी है।

अपने अपने कर्म का फल सबक् भुगतना होता है।

 

तो किसी को भगवान के बारे मे श्रद्धा है किसी को नहि है।

Can a Court Judge One’s Jati?

Here I am commenting on D K Duvey’s video at

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlJso9C5SQs

व्यक्ति की पहचान उसकी जाति कैसे तय हो सुप्रीम कोर्ट का निर्णय video

“How a person’s jati could be determined?” Supreme Court (SC) has give a judgment on that.

Q: Why SC wants to give a judgment on that?

A: Because the govt wants to give or not give free benefits to certain jatis.

Q: Why Govt wants to give free benefit to certain jatis?

A: 1) because of getting votes, and 2) to socially (or in other ways) uplift socially lower classes.

Q: Is it possible to make all persons equal?

A: No. God has made each person unique. It requires intelligence to figure how to use one’s strengths and abilities to rise to higher varna or jati; and all do not have that intelligence equally.

Q: In what aspect the Govt wants to uplift so called lower class?

A: Only the Govt can answer it, but if the Govt gives free money, then Govt actually wants to keep the lower in the same lower class. This is so because one who gets free benefit would want to remain low jati just to get free benefit.

Q: Is the desire to get something free a good character?

A: No. One who gets something free usually is not producing any useful, problem solving, service or product to raise the nation’s GDP.

Q: If one expects free benefits, is it one’s good character?

A: No. A freeloader is a burden to the society or nation. No one looks up at such a person. It is (should be) shame for one who expects something free from other(s).

Q: Are the persons in a lower jati oppressed or mistreated by other jatis?

A: If they are, then it is sinful, and crime, of the other jatis. Rather than asking for free benefits, the lower jatis should file complaints against those who oppress them or mistreat them. Additionally, Hindu social and dharma organizations and dharma gurus need to

spread Dharma so that on one would do such sin and crimes. Looking from different angle, we could say that if there are no FIR’s about oppression, then there is not caste or jati issue in the nation.

Q: What should the Govt do to make some lower jatis happy?

A: Govt should give temporary help so that those who are at lower level can rise by their own effort. Govt can give GuNa training and karma training to raise those whose guNa and karma are at lower level. Additionally, Govt should ensure that the lower class should get basic necessities. E. g. no one should sleep hungry, and they should get medical care and justice easily. Those lower jati person who are healthy could be given micro loans to become producers of value products or services.

Q: Can one change one’s GuNa and Karma?

A: Sure, if one decides to do so, and feels shame to get anything free. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada’s thousands of disciples were freeloader hippies with no dharma or any good character, but they became Krishna bhaktas, and even dharma preachers.

Q: Is it sin and detrimental to the nation if Govt give free benefits to people?

A: Yes, if it is done to get votes, and if benefits are given permanently to beneficiaries.

Q: Is one’s jati an intrinsic property of a person?

A: No. One’s jati is judged by one’s GuNa and karma. It is judged by each person for oneself and by the society in which one lives. It is not any courts business to judge one’s jati. One’s DNS is a scientific measure, but jati is not. Jati is a social classification for convenience, not for oppression or hating or mistreating.

Q: Are some works/jobs in society that most do not like to do it?

A: Yes, e. g. janitors’ job, butcher’ job, massage, etc. Those in the society who are poor do such jobs for living. Because they do it for the society, the society should care them, give them fair wage, and give due respect and dignity. No temple should bar them from entering a temple as long as they are clean.

The temples should provide shower rooms and some cloth where any unclean person can take shower, wear a clean cloth, and go for darshan. To not allow clean Hindus from entering temple is a sin per Hindu Dharma.

—

jaya sri krishna!

Suresh Vyas