Destruction of Hindu temples as recorded by Muslim Historians

From: S kumar <kumar_8134@yahoo. com>

Destruction of Hindu temples as recorded by Muslim Historians. . .  

Of The Book: Hindustan Islami Ahad mein (India under Islamic Rule) Name Of The Historian: Maulana Abdul Hai.  About The Author: He is a highly respected scholar and taken as an authority on Islamic history.  Because of his scholarship and his services to Islam, Maulana Abdul Hai was appointed as the Rector of the Darul Nadwa Ullum Nadwatal-Ulama.  He continued in that post till his death in February 1923.  The following section is taken from the chapter Hindustan ki Masjidein (The mosques of India) of the above mentioned book.  Here we can see a brief description of few important mosques in India and how each one of them was built upon plundered Hindu temples.
1.  Qawwat al-Islam Mosque at Delhi: “According to my findings the first mosque of Delhi is Qubbat al-Islam or Quwwat al_Islam which, Qutubud-Din Aibak constructed in H.  587 after demolishing the hindu temple built by Prithvi Raj and leaving certain parts of the temple outside the mosque proper; and when he returned from Ghazni in H.  592 he started building, under orders from Shihabud -Din Ghori, a huge mosque of inimitable red stones, and certain parts of the temple were included in the mosque. . . ”
2. The Mosque at Jaunpur: “This was built by Sultan Ibrahim Sharqi with chiselled stones.  Originally it was a Hindu temple after demolishing which he constructed the mosque.  It is known as the Atala Masjid. . ”

 

3. The Mosque at Qanauj: “It is well known that this mosque was built on the foundations of some Hindu temple that stood here.  The mosque was built by Ibrahim Sharqi in H.  809 as is recorded in Gharbat Nigar”

 

4. Jami Masjid at Etawah: “This mosque stands on the bank of the Jamuna at Etawah.  There was a Hindu temple at this place, on the site of which this mosque was constructed. . ”

 

5. Babri Masjid at Ayodhya: “This mosque was constructed by Babar at Ayodhya which Hindus call the birth place of Ramchandraji. . .  Sita had a temple here in which she lived and cooked for her husband.  On that very site Babar constructed this mosque in H. 963 ”

 

6. Mosque at Benaras: “Mosque of Benares was built by Alamgir Aurangzeb on the site of Bisheshwar Temple .  That temple was very tall and held as holy among Hindus.  On this very site and with those very stones he constructed a lofty mosque, and its ancient stones were rearranged after being embedded in the walls of the mosque.  It is one of the renowned mosques of Hindustan . ”

 

7. Mosque at Mathura: “Alamgir Aurangzeb built a mosque at Mathura .  This mosque was built on site of the Govind Dev Temple which was very strong and beautiful as well as exquisite. . ”

Name Of The Book: Futuhu’l-Buldan Name Of The Historian: Ahmed bin Yahya bin Jabir About The Author: This author is also known as al- Biladhuri.  He lived at the court of Khalifa Al- Mutawakkal (AD 847-861) and died in AD 893.  His history is one of the major Arab chronicles.  The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:
1. Ibn Samurah (AD 653) Siestan (Iran) “On reaching Dawar, he surrounded the enemy in the mountain of Zur, where there was a famous Hindu temple. ” “. . . Their idol of Zur was of gold, and its eyes were two rubies.  The zealous Musalmans cut off its hands and plucked out its eyes, and then remarked to the Marzaban how powerless was his idol. . . “

 

2. Qutaibah bin Muslim al-Bahili (AD 705-715) Samarkand (Farghana) “Other authorities say that Kutaibah granted peace for 700,000 dirhams and entertainment for the Moslems for three days.  The terms of surrender included also the houses of the idols and the fire temples.  The idols were thrown out,plundered of their ornaments and burned. . . “

 

3. Mohammed bin Qasim (AD 712-715) Debal (Sindh) “. . . The town was thus taken by assault, and the carnage endured for three days.  The governor of the town, appointed by Dahir, fled and the priests of the temple were massacred.  Muhammad marked a place for the Musalmans to dwell in, built a mosque, and left 4,000 Musalmans to garrison the place. . . ” “. . . ‘Ambissa son of Ishak Az Zabbi, the governor of Sindh, in the Khilafat of Mu’tasim billah knocked down the upper part of the minaret of the temple and converted it into a prison. . . “ Multan (Punjab) “. . . He then crossed the Biyas, and went towards Multan . . . Muhammad destroyed the water-course; upon which the inhabitants, oppressed with thirst, surrendered at discretion.  He massacred the men capable of bearing arms, but the children were taken captive, as well as ministers of the temple, to the number of 6,000.  The Musalmans found there much gold in a chamber ten cubits long by eight broad. . . ”
4. Hasham bin ‘Amru al-Taghlabi Khandahar (Maharashtra) “He then went to Khandahar in boats and conquered it.  He destroyed the Budd(idol) there, and built in its place a mosque. “
Name Of The Book: Tarikh-i-Tabari Name Of The Historian: Abu Ja’far Muhammad bin Jarir at-Tabari About The Author: This author is considered to be the foremost historian of Islam.  The above mentioned book written by him is regarded as the mother of histories.  The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:
5. Qutaibah bin Muslim al-Bahili (AD 705-715) Beykund (Khurasan) “The ultimate capture of Beykund (in AD 706) rewarded him with an incalculable booty; even more than had hitherto fallen into the hands of the Mohammedans by the conquest of the entire province of Khorassaun; and the unfortunate merchants of the town, having been absent on a trading excursion while their country was assailed by the enemy, and finding their habitations desolate on their return contributed further to enrich the invaders, by the ransom which they paid for the recovery of their wives and children.  The oranments alone, of which these women had been plundered, being melted down, produce, in gold, 150,000 meskals; of a dram and a half each.  Among the articles of the booty, is also described an image of gold, of 50,000 meskals, of which the eyes were two pearls, the exquisite beauty and magnitude of which excited the surprise and admiration of Kateibah.  They were transmitted by him, with a fifth of the spoil to Hejauje, together with a request that he might be permitted to distribute, to the troops, the arms which had been found in the palace in great profusion. ”
Samarkand (Farghana) “A breach was, however, at last effected in the walls of the city in AD 712 by the warlike machines of Kateibah; and some of the most daring of its defenders having fallen by the skill of his archers, the besieged demanded a cessation of arms to the following day, when they promised to capitulate.  The request was acceded to the Kateibah; and a treaty was the next day accordingly concluded between him and the prince of Samarkand, by which the latter engaged for the annual payment of ten million of dhirems, and a supply of three thousand slaves; of whom it was particularly stipulated, that none should either be in a state of infancy, or ineffective from old age and debility.  He further contracted that the ministers of his religion should be expelled from their temples and their idols destroyed and burnt; that Kateibah should be allowed to establish a mosque in the place of the principal temple. . . . “

“. . . Kateibah accordingly set set fire to the whole collection with his own hands; it was soon consumed to ashes, and 50,000 meskals of gold and silver, collected from the nails which had been used in the workmanship of the images. ”
6. Yaqub bin Laith (AD 870-871) Balkh and Kabul (Afghanistan)

“He took Bamian, which he probably reached by way of Herat, and then marched on Balkh where he ruined (the temple) Naushad.  On his way back from Balkh he attacked Kabul . . . ” “Starting from Panjhir, the place he is known to have visited, he must have passed through the capital city of the Hindu Sahis to rob the sacred temple –the reputed place of coronation of the Sahi rulers — of its sculptural wealth. . . ” “The exact details of the spoil collected from Kabul valley are lacking.  The Tarikh [-i-Sistan] records 50 idols of gold and silver and Mas’udi mentions elephants.  The wonder excited in Baghdad by baghdad by elephants and pagan idols forwarded to the Caliph by Ya’qub also speaks for their high value. ”
Name Of The Book: Tarikhu’l-Hind Name Of The Historian: Abu Rihan Muhammad bin Ahmad al-Biruni al-Khwarizmi. About The Author: This author spent 40 years in India during the reign of Sultan Mahmud of Ghazni (AD 997 – 1030).  His history treats of the literature and learning of the Hindus at the commencement of the 11th century.

The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:

 

7. Jalam ibn Shaiban (9th century AD) Multan (Punjab) “A famous idol of theirs was that of Multan, dedicated to the sun, and therefore called Aditya.  It was of wood and covered with red Cordovan leather; in its two eyes were two red rubies.  It is said to have been made in the last Kritayuga . . . . . When Muhammad Ibn Alkasim Ibn Almunaibh conquered Multan, he inquired how the town had become so very flourishing and so many treasures had there been accumulated, and then he found out that this idol was the cause, for there came pilgrims from all sides to visit it.  Therefore he thought it best to have the idol where it was, but he hung a piece of cow’s flesh on its neck by way of mockery.  On the same place a mosque was built.  When the Karmatians occupied Multan, Jalam Ibn Shaiban, the usurper, broke the idol into pieces and killed its priests. . . “
8. Sultan Mahmud of Gazni (AD 997-1030) Thanesar (Haryana) “The city of Taneshar is highly venerated by Hindus.  The idol of that place iscalled Cakrasvamin, i. e., the owner of the cakra, a weapon which we have already described.  It is of bronze, and is nearly the size of a man.  It is now lying in the hippodrome in Ghazna, together with the Lord of Somnath, which is a representation of the penis of the Mahadeva, called Linga. ” Somnath (Gujrat) “The linga he raised was the stone of Somnath, for soma means the moon and natan means master, so that the whole word means master of the moon.  The image was destroyed by the Prince Mahmud, may God be merciful to him! –AH 416.  He ordered the upper part to be broken and the remainder to be transported to his residence, Ghaznin, with all its coverings and trappings of gold, jewels, and embroided garments.  Part of it has been thrown into the hippodrome of the town, together with Cakrasvamin, an idol of bronze, that had been brought from Taneshar.  Another part of the idol from Somnath lies before the door of the mosque of Ghaznin, on which people rub their feet to clean them from dirt and wet. “


Name Of The Book: Kitabu’l-Yamini Name Of The Historian: Abu Nasr Muhammad ibn Muhammad al Jabbaru’l-Utbi. About The Author: This author’s work comprises the whole of the reign of Subuktigin and that of Sultan Mahmud down to the year AD 1020.
The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:
Amir Sbuktigin Of Ghazni Lamghan (Afghanistan) “The Amir marched out towards Lamghan, which is a city celebrated for its great strength and abounding wealth.  He conquered it and set fire to the places in its vicinity which were inhabited by infidels, and demolishing idol temples, he established Islam in them.  He marched and captured other cities and killed the polluted wretches, destroying the idolaters and gratifying the Musulmans. “Sultan Mahmud of Ghazni (AD 997-1030) Narain (Rajasthan) “The Sultan again resolved on an expedition to Hind, and marched towards Narain, urging his horses and moving over ground, hard and soft, until he came to the middle of Hind, where he reduced chiefs, who, up to that time obeyed no master, overturned their idols, put to the sword the vagabonds of that country, and with delay and circumspection proceeded to accomplish his design. . . ”
Nardin (Punjab) “After the Sultan had purified Hind from idolatry, and raised mosques therein, he determined to invade the capital of Hind to punish those who kept idols and would not acknowledge the unity of God. . . He marched with a large army in the year AH 404 (AD 1013) during a dark night. . . ”

“A stone was found there in the temple of the great Budda on which an inscription was written purporting that the temple had been founded 50,000 years ago.  The Sultan was surprised at the ignorance of these people, because those who believe in the true faith represent that only seven hundred years have elapsed since the creation of the world, and the signs of resurrection are even now approaching.  The Sultan asked his wise men the meaning of this inscription and they all concurred in saying that it was false, and no faith was to be put in the evidence of a stone. ”
Thanesar (Haryana) “The chief of Tanesar was. . . obstinate in his infidelity and denial of God.  So the Sultan marched against him with his valiant warriors, for the purpose of planting the standards of Islam and extirpating idolatry. . ” “The blood of the infidels flowed so copiously, that the stream was discoloured, notwithstanding its purity, and people were unable to drink it. . . The victory gained by God’s grace, who has established Islam for ever as the best religions, notwithstanding that idolaters revolt against it. . . Praise be to God, the protector of the world, for the honour he bestows upon Islam and Musulmans. “
Mathura (Uttar Pradesh) “The Sultan then departed from the environs of the city, in which was a temple of the Hindus.  The name of this place was Mahartul Hind. . .  On both sides of the city there were a thousand houses, to which idol temples were attached, all strengthened from top to bottom by rivets of iron, and all made of masonry work. . . ” “In the middle of the city there was a temple larger and firmer than the rest, which can neither be described nor painted.  The Sultan thus wrote respecting it:–‘If any should wish to construct a building equal to this, he would not be able to do it without expending an 100,000,000 red dinars, and it would occupy 200 years even though the most experience and able workmen were employed’. . .  The Sultan gave orders that all temples should be burnt with naptha and fire, and levelled with the ground. “
Kanauj (Uttar Pradesh) “In Kanauj there were nearly 10,000 temples, which the idolaters falsely and absurdly represented to have been founded by their ancestors two or three hundred thousand years ago. . . Many of the inhabitants of the place fled and were scattered abroad like so many wretched widows and orphans, from the fear which oppressed them, in consequence of witnessing the fate of their deaf and dumb idols.  Many of them thus effected their escape, and those who did not fly were put to death. “
The following is a continuation of last week’s article, Destruction Of Hindu Temples By Muslims –

Part I.  In this article you will once again notice the Muslim Historians glorify the crimes committed by the Muslims in India.  As stated and proved in my previous articles the glorification of such crimes has been recorded because the Koran promotes and supports such criminal acts.  The following is a presentation of the literary evidence available to us.  This evidence stated below is in chronological order with reference to the time at which a particular work was written.
Name Of The Book: Diwan-i-Salman Name Of The Historian: Khawajah Masud bin Sa’d bin Salman About The Author: Khawajah Masud bin Sa’d bin Salman was a poet.  He wrote poems in praise of the Ghaznavid Sultans- Masu’d, Ibrahim and
Bahram Shah.  He died sometime between AD 1126 and 1131.
The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:
Sultan Abu’l Muzaffar Ibrahim (AD 1059-1099) “As power and the strength of a lion was bestowed upon Ibrahim by the Almighty, he made over to him the well-populated country of Hindustan and gave him 40,000 valiant horsemen to take the country, in which there were more than 1000 rais. . . The army of the king destroyed at one time a thousand temples of idols, which had each been built for more than a thousand years.  How can I describe the victories of the King. . . ” Jalandhar (Punjab) “The narrative of any battles eclipses the stories of Rustam and Isfandiyar. . . By morning meal, not one soldier, not one Brahmin remained unkilled or uncaptured.  Their heads were levelled with the ground with falming fire. . Thou has secured the victory to the country and to religion, for amongst the Hindus this achievement will be remembered till the day of resurrection.

“Malwa (Madhya Pradesh) “. . On this journey, the army destroyed a thousand idol-temples and thy elephants trampled over more than a hundred strongholds.  Thou didst march thy army to Ujjan; . .  The lip of infidelity became dry through fear of thee, the eye of plural-worship became blind. . ”
Name Of The Book: Chach-Namah Name Of The Historian: Mohammed Al bin Hamid bin Abu Bakr Kufi About The Author: The Persian history was translated from arabic by the above mentioned author in the time of Nasiruddin Qabacha, a slave of Mohammed Ghori.

The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:

 

Mohammed bin Qasim (AD 712-715)Siwistan and Sisam (Sindh)Mohammed bin Qasem wrote to al-Hajjaj, the governor of Iraq :”The forts of Siwistan and Sism have been already taken.  The nephew of Dahir, his warriors and principla officers have been despatched, and infidels converted to Islam or destroyed.  Instead of idol temples, mosques and other places of worship have been built, pulpits have been erected, the Khutba is read, the call to prayers is raised so that devotions are performed at sacred hours. ”

 

Multan (Punjab). . “Mohammed Qasem arose and with his counsellors, guards and attendants, went to the temple.  He saw there an idol made of gold.  and its two eye were bright red rubies.  “. . Muhammed Qasem ordered the idol to be taken up.  Two hundred and thirty “mans” of gold were brought to the treasury together with the gems and pearls and treasures which were obtained from the plunder of Multan .  “
Name Of The Book: Jamiu’l-Hikayat Name Of The Historian: Maulana Nuruddin Muhammed `UfiAbout The Author: The author was born in or near the city of Bukhara in Transoxiana.  He came to India and lived in Delhi for some time in the reign ofShamsu’d-Din Iltutmish (AD 1210-1236)

 

The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:

Amru bin Laith (AD 879-900) Sakawand (Afghanistan) “It is related that Amru Lais conferred the governorship of Zabulistan on Fardaghan and sent him there at the head of four thousand horses.  There was a large Hindu place of worship in that country, which was called Sakawand and people used to come on pilgrimage from the most remote parts of Hindustan to the idols of that place.  When Fardaghan arrived in Zabulistan he led his army against it, took the temple, broke the idols in pieces and overthrew the idolators. . . “
Name Of The Book: Taju’l-Ma’sir Name Of The Historian: Sadru’d-Din Muhammed Hasan Nizamii About The Author: The author was born at Nishapur in Khurusan.  He had to leave his ancestral place because of the Mongol invasion.  He came to India and started writing his history in AD 1205.
The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:

Sultan Muhammed Ghuri (AD 1175-1206) Ajmer (Rajasthan) “He destroyed the pillars and foundations of the idol temples and built in their stead mosques and colleges, and the precepts of Islam, and the customs of the law were divulged and established. . . ”

Kuhram and Samana (Punjab) “The Government of the fort of Kohram and Samana were made over by the Sultan to Kutuu-din. . He purged by his sword the land of Hind from the filth of infidelity and vice, and freed it from the thorn of God-plurality, and the impurity of idol-worship and by his royal vigour and intrepidity, left not one temple standing. . . ”
Meerut (Uttar Pradesh) “Kutub-d din marched from Kohran and when he arrived at Meerut which is one of the celebrated forts of the country of Hind, for the strength of its foundations and superstructure, and its ditch, which was as broad as the ocean and fathomless- an army joined him, sent by the dependent chiefs of the country.  The fort was captured, and a Kotwal was appointed to take up his station in the fort, and all the idol temples were converted into mosques. ”
Delhi “He then marched and encamped under the fort of Delhi . . . The city and its vicinity were freed from idols and idol-worhips, and in the sanctuaries of the images of the Gods, mosques were raised by the worshippers of one God.  Kutub-d din built the Jami Masjid at Delhi and adorned it with stones and gold obtained from the temples which had been demolished by the elephants, and covered it with inscriptions in Toghra, containing the divine commands. “
Varanasi (Uttar Pradesh) “From that place (Asni) the royal army proceeded towards Benares which is the center of the country of Hind and here they destroyed nearly 1000 temples, and raised mosques on their foundations and the knowledge of the law became promulgated, and the foundations of religion were established. . ”
Aligarh (Uttar Pradesh) “There was a certain tribe in the neighbourhood of Kol which had. . occasioned much trouble. . Three bastions were raised as high as heaven with their heads, and their carcases became the food of beasts of prey.  That tract was freed from idols and idol worship and the foundation of infidelity were destroyed”. .
Bayana (Rajasthan) “When Kutub-d din heard of Sultan’s march from Ghazna, he was much rejoiced and advanced as far as Hansi to meet him. .  In the year AH 592 (AD 1196), they marched towards Thangar, and the center of idolatry and perdition became the abode of glory and splendour. . “

Kalinjar (Uttar Pradesh) “In the year AH 599 (Ad 1202), Kutub-d din proceeded to the investment Kalinjar, on which expedition he was accompanied by the Sahib-Kiran, Shamsu-d din Altmash. . .  The temples were converted into mosques and abodes of goodness, and the ejaculations of bead counters and voices of summoners to prayer ascended to high heaven, and the very name of idolatry was annihilated. . ”
Sultan Shamsu’d-Din Iltutmish (AD 1210-1236) Delhi “The Sultan then returned from Jalor to Delhi . . and after his arrival ‘not a vestige or name remained of idol temples which had raised their heads on high; and the light of faith shone out from the darkness of infidelity. . and the moon of religion and the state became resplendent from the heaven of prosperity and glory. ”
Name Of The Book: Kamilu’t-Tawarikh Name Of The Historian: Ibn Asir About The Author: The author was born in AD 1160 in the Jazirat ibn Umar, an island on the Tigris above Mosul.
The Muslim Rulers he Wrote About:

Khalifa Al-Mahdi (AD 775-785) Barada (Gujrat) “In the year 159 (AD 776) Al Mahdi sent an army by sea under Abdul Malik bin Shahabu’l Musamma’i to India. . They proceeded on their way and at length disembarked at Barada.  When they reached the place they laid siege on it. . The town was reduced to extremities and God prevailed over it in the same year.  The people were forbidden to worship the Budd, which the Muhammadans burned. ”
Name Of The Book: Tarikh-i-Jahan-Kusha Name Of The Historian: Alaud-Din Malik ibn Bahaud-Din Muhammed JuwainiAbout The Author: The author was born a native of Juwain in Khurasan near Nishapur.  He was the Halaku during the Mongol campaign against the Ismai’lians and was later appointed the governor of Baghdad.  He fell from grace and was imprisoned at Hamadan.

The Muslim Rulers he Wrote About:

 

Sultan Jalalud-Din Mankbarni (AD 1222-1231) Debal (Sindh) “The Sultan then went towards Dewal and darbela and Jaisi. . .  The Sultan raised Masjid at Dewal, on the spot where an idol temple stood. ”
Name Of The Book: Mifathu’l-Futuh Name Of The Historian: Amir Khusru About The Author: The author, Amir Khusru was born at Delhi in 1253.  His father occupied high positions in the reigns of Sultan Shamsu’d Din Iltutmish (AD 1210-1236) and his successors.  Reputed to be the dearest disciple of Shykh Nizamuddin Auliya, he became the lick-spittle of whoever came out victorious in the contest for the throne at Delhi .  He became the court poet of Balban’s successor, Sultan Kaiqbad.
The Muslim Rulers he wrote About:

Sultan Jajalu’d-Din Khalji (AD 1290-1296) Jhain (Rajasthan) “The Sultan reached Jhain in the afternoon of the third day and stayed in the palace of the Raya. . he greatly enjoyed his stay for some time.  Coming out, ho took a round of gardens and temples.  The idols he saw amazed him . .  Next day he got those idols of gold smashed with stones.  The pillars of wood were burnt down by his order. . .  A cry rose from the temples as if a second Mahmud has taken birth.  Two idols were made of brass, one of which weighed nearly thousand “mans”. He got both of them broken, and the pieces were distributed among his people so that they may throw them at the door of Masjid on their return to Delhi. “
Sultan Alaud-Din Khilji (AD 1296-1316) Vidisha (Madhya Pradesh) “When he advanced from the capital of Karra, the Hindus, in alarm, descended into the earth like ants.  He departed towards the garden of Behar to dye that soil with blood as red as tulip.  He cleared the road to Ujjain of vile wretches, and created consternation in Bhilsan.  When he affected his conquests in that country, he drew out of the river the idols which had been concealed in it.
Devagiri (Maharshtra) “But see the mercy with which he regarded the broken-hearted, for, after seizing the rai, he set him free again.  He destroyed the temples of the idolaters, and erected pulpits and arches for mosques.  ”
This is Part III of the series of articles on destruction of Hindu Temples by Muslims.  Here too, I shall continue to provide the vast amount of literary evidence available to us.  This evidence is taken directly from the books written by Muslim Historians themselves who glorify the horrific deeds of their Islamic heroes.
Name Of The Book: Nuh Siphir Name of the Historian: Amir Khusru About the Author: The above mentioned book is the fourth historical mathnavi which Amir Khusru wrote when he was 67 years old.  It celebrates the reign of Sultan Mubarak Shah Khalji.

 

The Muslim Rulers he wrote About:

Sultan Mubarak Shah Khalji (AD 1315-1320)Warrangal (Andhra Pradesh) “They pursued the enemy to the gates and set everything on fire.  They burnt down all those gardens and groves.  That paradise of idol-worshippers became like hell.  The fire-worshippers of “Bud” were in alarm and flocked round their idols. . ”
Name of the Book: Siyaru’l-Auliya

Name of the Historian: Sayyed Muhammed bin Mubarak bin Muhammed About the Author: He was the grandson of an Iranian merchant who traded between Kirman in Iran and Lahore .  The family travelled to Delhi after Shykh Farid’s death and became devoted to Shykh Nizamu’d-din Auliya.
The Muslim Rulers he wrote About:

Shykh Mu’in al-Din Chisti Ajmer (AD 1236) Ajmer (Rajasthan) “. . Because of his Sword, instead of idols and temples in the land of unbelief now there are mosques, mihrab amd mimbar.  In the land where there were the sayings of the idol-worshippers, there is the sound of ‘Allahu Akbar’. . . The descendants of those who were converted to Islam in this land will live until Day of Judgement; so too will those who bring others into the fold of Islam by the sword of Islam.  Until the Day of Judgement these converts will be in debt of Shaykh al-Islam Mu’in al-din Hasam Sijzi. . . ”

Name of the Book: Masalik’ul Absar fi Mamalik’ul Amsar Name of the Historian:
Shihabu’d-Din ‘Abu’l Abbas Ahmed bin Yahya.  About the Author: He was born in AD 1301.  He was educated in Damascus and Cairo.  He is considered to be a great man scholar of his time and author of many books.  He occupied high positions in Syria and Egypt.
The Muslim Rulers he wrote About:

Sultan Muhammed bin Tughlaq (AD 1325-1351) “The Sultan is not slack in Jihad.  He never lets go of his spear or bridle in pursuing jihad by land and sea routes.  This is his main occupation which engages his eyes and ears.  Five temples have been destroyed and the images and idols of “Budd” have been broken, and the lands have been freed from those who were not included in the daru’l Islam that is, those who had refused to become zimmis.  Thereafter he got mosques and places of worship erected, and music replaced by call to prayers to Allah. . .  The Sultan who is ruling at present has achieved that which had not been achieved so far by any king.  He has achieved victory, supremacy, conquest of countries, destruction of the infidels, and exposure of magicians.  He has destroyed idols by which the people of Hindustan were deceived in vain. . . ”
Name of the Book: Rehala of Ibn Battuta Name of the Historian: Shykh Abu Abdullah Muhammad ibn Ibrahim al-Lawatt at-Tanji al-Maruf be Ibn Battuta.
About the Author: He belonged to an Arab family which was settled in Spain since AD 1312.  His grandfather and father enjoyed the reputation of scholars and theologians.  He himself was a great scholar who travelled extensively and over many lands.  He came to India in 1325 and visited many places.  He was very fond of sampling Hindu girls from different parts of India .  They were presented to him by the Sultan Mohammed bin-Tughlaq with whom Ibn Battuta came in close contact.  He also married Muslim women wherever he stayed and divorced them before his departure.
His Travel description: (Delhi) “Near the eastern gate of the mosque, lie two very big idols of copper connected together by stones.  Everyone who comes in and goes out of the mosque treads over them.  On the site of this mosque was a bud Khana that is an idol-house.  After the conquest of Delhi, it was turned into a mosque. . . “
Name of the Book: Tarikh-i-Firuz Name of the Historian: Shams Siraj Alif
About the Author: The author became a courtier of Sultan Firuz Shah Tughlaq and undertook to complete the aforementioned history of Barani who had stopped at the sixth year of Firuz Shah’s reign.
The Muslim Rulers he wrote About:Sultan Firuz Shah Tughlaq (AD 1351-1388) Puri (Orissa):”The Sultan left Banarasi with the intention of pursuing the Rani of Jajnagar, who had fled to an island in the river. . . News was then brought that in the jangal were seven elephants, and one old shoe-elephant, which was very fierce.  The Sultan resolved upon endeavoring to capture these elephants before continuing the pursuit of the Rai. . .  After the hunt was over, the Sultan directed his attention to the Rai of Jajnagar, and entering the palace where he dwelt he found many fine buildings.  It is reported that inside the Rai’s fort, there was a stone idol which the infidels called Jagannath, and to which they paid their devotions.  Sultan Firoz, in emulation of Mahmud Subuktign, having rooted up the idol, carried it away to Delhi where he placed it in an ignominious position. ”
Nagarkot Kangra(Himachal Pradesh)”. . Sultan Muhammed Shah bin Tughlaq and Sultan Firuz Shah Tughlaq were sovereigns especially chosen by Almighty from among the faithful, and in their whole course of their reigns, wherever they took an idol temple they broke and destroyed it. .
” Delhi “A report was brought to the Sultan that there was in Delhi an old Brahmin who persisted in publicly performing the worship of idols in his house; and that people of the city, both Musalmans and Hindus, used to resort to his house to worship the idol.  The Brahmin had constructed a wooden tablet which was covered within and without with paintings of demons and other objects.  . An order was accordingly given that the Brahmin, with his tablet, should be brought into the presence of the Sultan at Firozabad.  The judges and doctors and elders and lawyers were summoned, and the case of the Brahaman was submitted for their opinion.  Their reply was that the provisions of the Law were clear: the Brahmin must either become a Musalman or be burned.  The true faith was declared to the Brahmin, and the right course pointed out, but he refused to accept it.  Orders were given for raising a pile of faggots before the door of the darbar (court). The Brahmin was tied hand and foot and cast into it; the tablet was thrown on top and the pile was lighted.  The writer of this book was present at the darbar and witnessed the execution.  The tablet of the Brahmin was lighted in two places, at his head and at his feet; the wood was dry and the fire first reached his feet, and drew him a cry, but the flames quickly enveloped his head and consumed him.  Behold the Sultan’s strict adherence to law and rectitude, how he would not deviate in the least from its decrees!”

Here Sultan Firuz Shah Tughlaq glorifies his own criminal acts in Bharat as sanctioned by the “holy” Koran.  Name of the Book: Futuhat-i-Firuz Shahi
Name of the Historian: Sultan Firuz Shah Tughlaq About the Author: Sultan had got the eight chapters of his work inscribed on eight slabs of stone which were fixed on eight sides of the octagonal dome of a building near the Jami Masjid at Firuzabad.
Prayers of Temple-destroyers in this Book “The next matter which by God’s help I accomplished, was the repetition of names and titles of former sovereigns which had been omitted from the prayers of Sabbaths and Feasts.  The names of those sovereigns of Islam, under whose happy fortune and favour infidel countries had been conquered, whose banners had waved over many a land, under whom idol-temples had been demolished, and mosques and pulpits built and exalted. . . “Delhi and Evirons “The Hindus and idol-worshippers had agreed to pay the money for toleration (zar-i zimmiya) and had consented to the poll-tax (jiziya) in return for which they and their families enjoyed security.  These people now erected new idol-temples in the city and the environs in opposition to the law of the Prophet which declares that such temples are not to be tolerated.  Under divine guidance I destroyed these edifices and I killed those leaders of infidelity who seduced others into error, and the lower orders I subjected to stripes and chastisement, until this abuse was entirely abolished.  Following is an instance: In the village of Maluh, there is a tank which they call kund (tank).  Here they had built idol-temples and on certain days the Hindus were accustomed to proceed thither on horseback and wearing arms.  Their women and children also went out in palankins and carts.  Then they assembled in thousands and performed idol worship. . . . When intelligence of this came to my ears my religious feelings prompted me at once to put a stop to this scandal and offence to the religion of Islam.  On the day of the assembly I went there in person and I ordered that the leaders of these people and the promoters of these abominations should be put to death.  I destroyed their idol-temples and instead there of raised mosques. ”
Gohana (Haryana)”Some Hindus had erected a new idol-temple in the village of Kohana and the idolators used to assemble there and perform their idolatrous rites.  These people were seized and brought before me.  I ordered that the perverse conduct of the leaders of this wickedness should be publicly proclaimed, and that they should be put to death before the gate of the palace.  I also ordered that the infidel books, the idols and the vessels used in their worship, which had been taken with idols, should all be publicly burnt.  The others were restrained by threats and punishments, as a warning to all men, that no zimmi could follow such wicked practices in a Muslaman country. ”

Name of the Book: Tarikh-i-Mubarak Shahi Name of the Historian: Yahya  Ammad bin Abdullah Sirhindi About the Author: The author lived in the reign of Sultan Muizu’d-Din Abu’l Fath Mubarak Shah (AD 1421-1434) of the Sayyid dynasty which ruled at Delhi from AD 1414-1451.
The Muslim Rulers he wrote About:

Sultan Shamsu’d-Din Iltutmish (AD 1210-1236)Vidisha and Ujjain (Madhya Pradesh) “In AH 631 he invaded Malwah, and after supressing the rebels of that place, he destroyed that idol-temple which had existed there for the past three hundred years.  Next he turned towards Ujjain and conquered it, and after demolishing the idol- temple of Mahakal, he uprooted the statue of Bikramajit together with all other statues and images which were placed on pedestals, and brought them to the capital where they were laid before the Jami Masjid for being trodden under foot by the people

Name of the Book: Tarikh-i-MuhammadiName of the Historian: Muhammed Bihamad Khani About the Author: The author was the son of the governor of Irich in Bundelkhand.  He was a soldier who participated in several wars.  His history covers a long period – from Prophet Mohammed to AD 1438-39
The Muslim Rulers he wrote About:

Sultan Ghiyasu’d-Din Tughlaq Shah II (AD 1388-89)Kalpi (Uttar Pradesh)”In the meanwhile Delhi received news of the defeat of the armies of Islam which were with Malikzada Mahmud bin Firuz Khan. . . This Malikzada reached the bank of the Yamuna via Shahpur and renamed Kalpi which was the abode and center of the infidels and the wicked, as Muhammadabad, after the name of Prophet Muhammed.  He got mosques erected for the worship of Allah in places occupied by temples, and made that city his capital.

 

“Sultan Nasiru’d-Din Mahmud Shah Tughlaq (AD 1389-1412)Prayag and Kara (Uttar Pradesh) “The Sultan moved with the armies of Islam towards Prayag and Arail with the aim of destroying the infidels, and he laid waste both those places.  The vast crowd which had collected at Prayag for worshipping false gods was made captive.  The inhabitants of Kara were freed from the mischief of rebels on account of this aid from King and the name of this king of Islam became famous by this reason. “Another Moghul ruler by the name of Babur who was in love with a young boy named Baburi glorifies his lecherously Islamic deeds in the Babur-Nama

Name of the Book: Babur-Nama Name of the Author: Zahiru’d-Din Muhammed Babur
About the Author: The author of this book was the founder of Mughal dynasty in India who proclaimed himself a Padshah (Ruler) after his victory in the First Battle of Panipat (AD 1526), and a Ghazi (killer of kafirs) after the defeat of Rana Sanga in the Battle of Khandwa (AD 1528) While presenting himself as an indefatigable warrior and drug-addict he does not hide the cruelties he committed on the defeated people, particularly his fondness for building towers of the heads of those he captured as prisoners of war or killed in battle.  He is very liberal in citing appropriate verses from the Quran on the eve of the battle with Rana Sanga.  In order to ensure his victory, he makes a covenant with Allah by breaking the vessels containing wine as also the cups for drinking it, swearing at the same time that “he would break the idols of the idol-worshippers in a similar manner”.  In the Fath-Nama (prayer for victory) composed for him by Shykh Zain, Allah is described as “destroyers of idols from their foundations” The language he uses for his Hindu adversaries is typically Islamic.
Zahirud-Din Muhammed Babur Padshah Ghazi (AD 1526-1530)Chanderi (Madhya Pradesh) “In AH 934 (AD 1528), I attacked Chanderi and, by the grace of Allah, captured it in a few hours. . We got the infidels slaughtered and the place which had been a daru’l-harb for years, was made into daru’l-Islam. ”
Gwalior (Madhya Pradesh) “Next day, at the time of the noon prayer, we went out for seeing those places in Gwalior which we had not seen yet. . Going out of the Hathipole Gate of the fort, we arrived at a place called Urwa. .  Urwa is not a bad place It is an enclosed space.  Its biggest blemish is its statues.  I ordered that they should be destroyed. . . ”
Part IV of the series of articles on this subject will contain the Epigraphic evidence which is available to us.  There are inscriptions on present day Mosques in India which clearly state that the Muslims have converted the existing Hindu temples into Mosques.  Note: The passages presented in this article have been taken from Shri Sita Ram Goel’s book, Hindu Temples: What Happened To Them Vol.  I & II.

(The Epigraphic Evidence) The Ram Janmabhumi temple at Ayodhya is just one of the Hindu temples among thousands of others which were converted to Islamic structures by the barbaric Muslim Invaders.

The famous Islamic scholar Maulana Abdul Hai has admitted this fact himself in his research work Hindustan Islami Ahad Mein (India Under Islamic Rule).  Much of the attention has recently been focused on how many of the Hindu temples were converted to mosques, however, as Sita Ram Goel says, “The more important question, namely, why Hindu temples met the fate they did at the hands of Islamic invaders, has not even been whispered. ” Many Hindus seem to cater to popular opinion that Islam preaches that its followers should not build Islamic structures at other religious sites.  However, such people are grossly mistaken.  To quote further from Sita Ram Goel: “Hindu leaders have endorsed the Muslim propagandists in proclaiming that Islam does not permit the construction of mosques at other people’s place of worship.  One wonders whether this kowtowing to Islam is prompted by ignorance, or cowardice, or calculation, or a combination of them all.  The Islam of which the Hindu leaders are talking exists neither in the Qur’an nor in the Sunnah of the Prophet. “
The point made above by Sita Ram Goel is exactly what I have voiced in my previous articles titled, Destruction of Hindu Temples by Muslims.  The evidence which I have presented is of purely Islamic nature and cannot be refuted.  The crucial question: why the Islamic invaders did what they did can be clearly seen by reading the evidence.  The evidence basically consists of Muslims glorifying their heinous tasks by invoking the name of Allah and verses from the Koran.  They justify their barbaric deeds of loot, plunder, rape, torture, murder and destruction by saying that they do Allah’s bidding and for doing so their reward will be paradise with countless houries, untouched young boys, rivers of wine, variety of fruits and abundant water.  (To understand more clearly why such a paradise attracted Muslims read my article, The X-Rated Paradise of Islam). In my preceding articles on this topic I have presented the vast amount of literary evidence which prove to us that the Mosques and other Muslim structures present today in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh were originally Hindu places of worship.  The greedy and the lustful Islamic invaders inspired by the Koran and out of utter disrespect looted these sacred places and converted them into Islamic structures.  These existing Islamic structures are harsh reminders of the bloody Islamic invasions and the oppression, torment and torture that these invaders brought with them.  This article will focus on the epigraphic evidence associated with the Islamic structures existing in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh.  All the proofs that I have presented in my other articles concerning this topic have been taken from purely Islamic sources and as this epigraphic evidence constitutes of inscriptions left by Muslims themselves the evidence presented in this article is also of purely Islamic nature.  Some of the inscriptions on the mosques have been published by the Archaeological Survey of India in its Epigraphia Indica-Arabic and Persian Supplement, an annual which appeared first in 1907-08 as Epigraphia Indo-Moslemica. I have selected only a few inscriptions which have been thoroughly researched by the following: Arun Shourie, Harsh Narain, Jay Dubashi, Ram Swarup and Sita Ram Goel.  They have presented their research work in two volumes titled, Hindu Temples: What Happened To Them. The following is the narration of the “pious performance” by Muslims of plundering and converting Hindu temples to mosques and other Islamic structures.
Name of the structure: Quwwat al-Islam Masjid Location: Delhi in UttarPradesh Inscription: “This fort was conquered and the Jami Masjid built in the year 587 by the Amir(*), the great, the gloriuous commander of the Army, Qutub-ud-daula wad-din, the Amir-ul-umara Aibeg, the slave of the Sultan, may Allah strengthen his helperes.  The materials of 27 idol temples, on each of which 2,000,000 Delhiwals (**) had been spent were used in the construction of the mosque. ” *The Amir mentioned above was Qutubud-Din Aibak, slave of Muhammed Ghori.  **”Delhiwal” was a high denomination coin current at that time in Delhi .
Name of the structure: Mansuri Masjid Location: Vijapur in Gujrat Inscription:

“The Blessed and Exalted Allah says, ‘And verily, mosques are for Allah only; hence invoke not anyone else with Allah. ‘This edifice was originally built by the infidels.  After the advent of Islam, it was converted into a mosque.  Sermon was delivered here for sixty-seven years.  Due to the sedition of the infidels, it was again destroyed.  When during the reign of the Sultan of the time, Ahmad, the affairs of each Iqta attained magnificence, Bahadur, the Sarkhail, once again carried out repairs.  Through the generosity of Divine munificence, it became like new. ”
Name of the structure: Masjid at Manvi Location: Manvi in Karnataka Inscription:
“Praise be to Allah that by the decree of the Parvardigar, a mosque has been converted out of a temple as a sign of religion in the reign of the world- conquering emperor, the Sultan who is the asylum of the Faith and the possessor of the crown, who’s kingdom is young, viz.  Firuz Shah Bahmani, who is the cause of Exuberant spring in the garden of religion, Adu’l-Fath the king who conquered.  After the victory of the emperor, the chief of chiefs, Safdar (the valiant commander) of the age, received the fort.  The builder of this noble place of prayer is Muhammad Zahir Aqchi, the pivot of the Faith.  He constructed in the year 809 from the Migration of the Chosen (prophet Muhammdad) this Ka’ba like momento. ”
Name of the structure: Mausoleum of Shykh ‘Abdullah Shah Changal Location: Dhar in Madhya Pradesh Inscription:”The centre became Muhammadan first by him(*) (and) all the banners of religion were spread. . .  This lion-man came from the centre of religion to this old temple with a large force.  He broke the images of the false deities, and turned the idol temple into a mosque.  When Rai Bhoj saw this, through wisdom he embraced Islam with the family of his brave warriors(**).  This quarter becameilluminated by the light of the Muhammadan law, and the customs of the infidels became obsolete and abolished. “
*Shykh ‘Abdullah Shah Changal **In this case the Hindu King was Bhoj II and during his reign Jalalu’d-Din Khalji (AD 1290-1296) of Delhi invaded Malwa.  Changal was the Muslim missionarywho accompanied Khalji’s army.  This army after plundering and looting the kingdom of Bhoj II converted a Hindu temple into a mosque and forced the ruler and his subjects to accept Islam.

 

Name of the structure: Jami’ Masjid Location: Malan in Gujrat Inscription: “. . . (The Prophet), on him be peace, says ‘He who builds a mosque in the world, the Exalted Allah builds for him a palace in Paradise . ‘ In the auspicious time of the government and peaceful time of Mahmud Shah, son of Muhammad Shah, the sultan, the Jami’, mosque was constructed on the hill of the fort of Malun (or Malwan) by Khan-i-Azam Ulugh Khan. . . at the request of the thandar Kabir, (son of Diya), the building was constructed by the son of Ulugh Khan who is magnimonius, just, generous, brave and who suppressed the wrteched infidels.  He eradicated the idol-houses and mine of infidelity, along with the idols. . .  with the edge of his sword, and made ready this edifice. . .  He made its walls and doors out of the idols; the back of every stone became the place for prostration of the believer. . . ”
Name of the structure: Jami’ Masjid Location: Amod in Gujrat Inscription: “Allah and His grace.  When divine favour was bestowed on Khalil Shah, he constructed the Jami’ Masjid for the decoration of Islam; he ruined the idol-house and temple of the polytheists, (and) completed the Masjid and pulpit in its place.  Without doubt, his building was accepted by Allah. ”
Name of the structure: Shrine of Shah Madar Location: Narwar in Mdhya pradesh Inscription:”Dilawar Khan, the chief among the king’s viceroys, caused this mosque to built which is like a place of shelter for the favourites.  Infidelity has been subdued, and Islam has triumphed because of him.  The idols have bowed to him and the temples have been razed to the ground along with their foundations, and mosques and worship houses are flowing with riches. ”
Name of structure: Hamman Darwaza Masjid Location: Jaunpur in Uttar Pradesh Inscription: “Thanks by the guidance of Everlasting and the Living Allah, this house of infidelity became the niche of prayer.  As a reward for that, the Generous Lord constructed an abode for the builder in paradise. . . ”
Name of structure: Jami Masjid Location: Ghoda in Maharashtra Inscription: “O Allah O Muhammed ! O Ali ! When Mir Muhammed Zaman made up his mind, he opened the door of prosperity on himself by his own hand.  He demolished thirty-three idol temples and by divine grace laid the foundation of a building in the abode of predition. ”
Name of structure: Gachinala Masjid Location: Kurnool District of Andhra Pradesh Inscription: “He is Allah, may be glorified. . During the august rule of. . .  Muhammed Shah, there was a well established idol-house in Kuhmum. . .  Muhammed Salih. . . razed to the ground, the edifice of the idol-house and broke the idols in a manly fashion.  He constructed on its site a suitable mosque, towering above the building of all. ”

The above was a presentation of inscriptions on mosques and other Islamic structures in India .  These inscriptions, as you clearly read, glorify and justify the acts of the barbaric Muslim invaders by invoking Allah and the Koran.  Thus this leads us to the conclusion that Islam openly supports the criminal acts of loot, plunder, rape, murder, torment, torture and destruction!! More of the epigraphic evidence will follow in the next article on this topic.  Note: Works of Arun Shourie, Harsh Narain, Jay Dubashi and Sita Ram Goel have been used in this article.

Faith, fact and fiction

OPED | Thursday, October 21, 2010 Prafull Goradia

[History and ASI records prove Hindu temples have been vandalised time and again by Muslim rulers and invaders.  Will Muslims consider returning all those mandirs to Hindus in exchange of the Babri Masjid? ]

The recent judgement of the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court on the Ram Janmabhoomi has been criticised by several Muslim leaders and a self-styled secularist as one based on faith and not facts.  To insist on facts, when it comes to religion, is a contradiction in terms.  That Virgin Mary was the mother of Jesus Christ is a belief inspired by faith and we respect it.  Similarly, we do not question that Prophet Mohammed ascended to heaven from the Dome of Rock.

 

The short-sightedness of the Muslim institutions wanting to appeal to the Supreme Court against the High Court’s recent judgement on Ram Janmabhoomi is obvious.  In contrast, recall the vision of Sir Sikander Hayat Khan, the distinguished Premier of undivided Punjab : The Muslim League had sponsored the Punjab Muslim Mosques Protection Bill of 1938.  The intention was primarily to secure the restoration of the Shaheed Ganj mosque, which was being used as a gurudwara.

 

As stated by Professor Coupland, the Bill was expected to create a grave political crisis for Sir Sikander’s Unionist Party.  However, he still stood firm against the Bill and stated openly in the Punjab Assembly that the enactment of the legislation would provoke a retaliatory action in other provinces in respect of the numerous non-Muslim places of worship, which had passed into Muslim hands and had become sites of important Muslim holy places such as, the Dargah at Ajmer or the Quwwat-ul-Islam Mosque near Qutb Minar.

 

Significantly, the Council of the Muslim League approved of Sir Sikander’s contention and the Punjab Governor accordingly, did not permit the Bill to be introduced.  That left Barkat Ali, the sponsor of the Bill, disappointed.  The incident is quoted from Modern Muslim India and the Birth of Pakistan by Mr SM Ikram.

 

As a Hindu, I welcome the insistence on facts.  I could go to the extent of offering the Muslims the Babri masjid back provided their leaders agree to give back all the places of worship, which were proven mandirs and were converted into masjids by invaders or Muslim rulers.

 

I have seen and photographed several mosques whose walls carry integral carvings of Lord Ganesh.  The Quwwat-ul-Islam in Delhi and the Adina Mosque near Malda in West Bengal are two such examples.  The Jama Masjid in Vidisha near Bhopal is a veritable museum of Hindu idols.  The Rudra Mahalaya Complex at Siddhpur in Gujarat with its 11 temples used as Jami Masjid is another interesting example.  From within the precincts of the mosque, Hindu idols were excavated by the Archaeological Survey of India in 1979, but were buried back at the insistence of Muslim leaders.  This incidence was reported by the Fourth National Minorities Commission Report, 1983.  According to Alexander Cunningham, the legendary founder of ASI, it was the resplendent kingdom of Kannauj, which was later destroyed by Muhammad Ghori in 12th century.

 

In his Mathura : A District Memoir, FS Growse has recorded his exhaustive survey of Brajbhoomi.  He was so overwhelmed by the vandalism that he visited the area repeatedly and recorded it in detail.  To quote: “Thanks to Muhammadan intolerance, there is not a single building of any antiquity either in Mathura or, its environs.  Its most famous temple — that dedicated to Kesava Deva (Krishna) — was destroyed in 1669, the eleventh year of the reign of Aurangzeb or Alamgir.  The mosque (idgah) erected on its ruins is a building of little architectural value. ”

 

Over two centuries after the desecration, Growse felt that “of all the sacred places in India, none enjoys a greater popularity than the capital of Braj, the holy city of Mathura .  For nine months in the year, festival follows upon festival in rapid succession and the ghats and temples are daily thronged with new troops of way worn pilgrims”.  

 

Today, Balkrishna is worshipped in a little room, which appears like a servant quarter attached to the back of the idgah.  Definitely, any visitor, whether a devotee or otherwise, would feel pathetic.

 

The birthplace of Krishna was vandalised repeatedly.  It started with Mahmud of Ghazni in 1017 and went on till Aurangzeb’s rule in 17th century.  Historian Sri Ram Sharma in his The Religious Policy of the Mughal Emperors, first published in 1940, wrote: “Then came the turn of the temple of Keshav Rai at Mathura built at a cost of `33,00,000 by Rao Bir Singh Bundela during the reign of Jahangir.  It had excited the envy of many Muslims who, however, had not Aurangzeb’s power.  It had been built after the style of the famous temple at Bindraban which Man Singh had built at a cost of `5,00,000.  But Bir Singh had improved upon his model and spent more than six times as much as Man Singh had lavished on his shrine at Bindraban.  It had become a centre of pilgrimage for the whole of India .  The idols, studded with precious stones and adorned with gold work, were all taken to Agra and there buried under the steps of Jahanara’s mosque.  The temple was levelled to the ground and a mosque was ordered to be built on the site to mark the acquisition of religious merit by the emperor. ” Historian Sharma has relied on Maasiri-i-Alamgiri.

 

The Russians at the end of their conquest of Warsaw had built an Orthodox church, which stood for a hundred years until World War I.  It was demolished after the Polish takeover.  At the same site, the Poles rebuilt their Catholic church.  The incident was described by Sir Arnold Toynbee in the first Azad Memorial lecture delivered in Delhi .  He then went on to comment on the irony of independent India tolerating the idgah over Krishna Janmabhoomi and the two tall mosques built on the ghats of Benares.  

 

Ours being a peaceful society, Indians should avoid desecration.  A fair and square exchange of the Babri edifice for all the mandirs turned into masjids, which authentic records prove, should be acceptable to all.

 

M. K. Gandhi on Conversion

From:  Sudhir Srinivasan arsudhirkumar@gmail.com

 

Mahatma Gandhi on Conversion

 

Gandhiji was not awarded the Nobel peace prize because he refused to be converted. Now that missionaries are spreading their tentacles far and wide in India converting people by allurement, inducement and fraud (In the north east killings and threats are becoming commonplace) Gandhiji’s message is all the more relevant in understanding and reacting to this problem. Missionary Terrorism will become as dangerous as Islamic terrorism if ignored. Please read & distribute.

 

Compiled by Swami Aksharananda

(Track No. 010119.1, Jan. 19, 2001)

 

I Call Myself a Sanatani Hindu

 

I call myself a Sanatani Hindu, because I believe in the Vedas, the Upanishads, the Puranas, and all that goes by the name of Hindu scripture, and therefore in avataras and rebirth; I believe in the varnashrama dharma in a sense, in my opinion strictly Vedic but not in its presently popular and distorted crude sense; I believe in the protection of cow. I do not disbelieve in murti puja. (Young India: June 10, 1921)

 

Why I am Not a Convert

 

Hinduism as I know it entirely satisfies my soul, fills my whole being. When doubts haunt me, when disappointments stare me in the face, and when I see not one ray of light on the horizon, I turn to the Bhagavad Gita, and find a verse to comfort me; and I immediately begin to smile in the midst of overwhelming sorrow. My life has been full of tragedies and if they have not left any visible and indelible effect on me, I owe it to the teachings of the Bhagavad Gita. (Young India: June 8, 1925)

 

I Disbelieve in Conversion

 

I disbelieve in the conversion of one person by another. My effort should never to be to undermine another’s faith. This implies belief in the truth of all religions and, therefore, respect for them. It implies true humility. (Young India: April 23, 1931)

 

Conversion: Impediment to Peace

 

It is impossible for me to reconcile myself to the idea of conversion after the style that goes on in India and elsewhere today. It is an error which is perhaps the greatest impediment to the world’s progress toward peace. Why should a Christian want to convert a Hindu to Christianity? Why should he not be satisfied if the Hindu is a good or godly man? (Harijan: January 30, 1937)

 

No Such Thing as Conversion

 

I believe that there is no such thing as conversion from one faith to another in the accepted sense of the word. It is a highly personal matter for the individual and his God. I may not have any design upon my neighbour as to his faith which I must honour even as I honour my own. Having reverently studied the scriptures of the world I could no more think of asking a Christian or a Musalman, or a Parsi or a Jew to change his faith than I would think of changing my own. (Harijan: September 9, 1935)

 

No Conversion Designs Upon Me

 

I am not interested in weaning you from Christianity and making you Hindu, and I do not relish your designs upon me, if you had any, to convert me to Christianity. I would also dispute your claim that Christianity is the only true religion. (Harijan: June 3, 1937)

 

Conversion

 

Conversion must not mean denationalization. Conversion should mean a definite giving up of the evil of the old, adoption of all the good of the new and a scrupulous avoidance of everything evil in the new. Conversion, therefore, should mean a life of greater dedication to one’s country, greater surrender to God, greater self-purification. (Young India: August 20, 1925)

 

Aping of Europeans and Americans

 

As I wander about through the length and breath of India I see many Christian Indians almost ashamed of their birth, certainly of their ancestral religion, and of their ancestral dress. The aping of Europeans by Anglo-Indians is bad enough, but the aping of them by Indian converts is a violence done to their country and, shall I say, even to their new religion. (Young India: August 8, 1925)

 

Why Should I Change My Religion

 

I hold that proselytisation under the cloak of humanitarian work is unhealthy to say the least. It is most resented by people here. Religion after all is a deeply personal thing. It touches the heart.

 

Why should I change my religion because the doctor who professes Christianity as his religion has cured me of some disease, or why should the doctor expect me to change whilst I am under his influence? (Young India: April 23, 1931)

 

Missionary Aim: Uprooting Hinduism

 

My fear is that though Christian friends nowadays do not say or admit it that Hindu religion is untrue, they must harbour in their breast that Hinduism is an error and that Christianity, as they believe it, is the only true religion. So far as one can understand the present (Christian) effort, it is to uproot Hinduism from her very foundation and replace it by another faith. (Harijan: March 13,1937)

 

Undermining People’s Faith

 

The first distinction I would like to make between your missionary work and mine is that while I am strengthening the faith of people, you (missionaries) are undermining it. (Young India: November 8, 1927)

 

Physician Heal Yourself

 

Conversion nowadays has become a matter of business, like any other. India (Hindus) is in no need of conversion of this kind. Conversion in the sense of self-purification, self-realization is the crying need of the times. That however is never what is meant by proselytization. To those who would convert India (Hindus), might it not be said, “Physician, heal yourself.” (Young India: April 23, 1931)

 

Missionaries: Vendors of Goods

 

When the missionary of another religion goes to them, he goes like a vendor of goods. He has no special spiritual merit that will distinguish him from those to whom he goes. He does however possess material goods which he promises to those who will come to his fold. (Harijan: April 3, 1937)

 

If I had the Power and Could Legislate.

 

If I had the power and could legislate, I should stop all proselytizing. In Hindu households the advent of a missionary has meant the disruption of the family coming in the wake of change of dress, manners, language, food and drink . (November 5, 1935)

 

The Only Begotten Son of God?

 

I regard Jesus as a great teacher of humanity, but I do not regard him as the only begotten son of God. That epithet in its material interpretation is quite unacceptable. Metaphorically we are all sons of God, but for each of us there may be different sons of God in a special sense. Thus for me Chaitanya may be the only begotten son of God. God cannot be the exclusive Father and I cannot ascribe exclusive divinity to Jesus. (Harijan: June 3, 1937)

 

Western Christianity Today

 

It is my firm opinion that Europe (and the United States) does not represent the spirit of God or Christianity but the spirit of Satan. And Satan’s successes are the greatest when appears with the name of God on his lips. (Young India: September 8, 1920)

 

I consider western Christianity in its practical working a negation of Christ’s Christianity. I cannot conceive Jesus, if he was living in flesh in our midst, approving of modern Christian organizations, public worship, or ministry. (Young India: September 22, 1921)

 

Christianity and Imperialistic Exploitation

 

Christianity in India has been inextricably mixed up for the last one hundred and fifty years with British rule. It appears to us as synonymous with materialistic civilization and imperialistic exploitation by the stronger white races of the weaker races of the world. Its contribution to India has been, therefore, largely negative. (Young India: March 21, 1929)

 

No Room For Them

 

In the manner in which they are working there would seem to be no room for them. Quite unconsciously they do harm to themselves and also to us. It is perhaps impertinent to say that they do harm to themselves, but quite pertinent to say that they do harm to us. They do harm to those amongst whom they work and those amongst whom they do not work, i.e., the harm is done to the whole of India. The more I study their activities the more sorry I become. It is a tragedy that such a thing should happen to the human family. (Harijan: December 12, 1936)

 

Outrage!

 

Only the other day a missionary descended on a famine area with money in his pocket, distributed it among the famine stricken, converted them to his fold, took charge of their temple, and demolished it. This is outrageous. (Harijan: November 5, 1937)

 

Let the Hindu be a Better Hindu

 

I came to the conclusion long ago that all religions were true and also that all had some error in them, and whilst I hold by my own, I should hold others as dear as Hinduism. So we can only pray, if we are Hindus, not that a Christian should become a Hindu. But our innermost prayer should be a Hindu should be a better Hindu, a Muslim a better Muslim, a Christian a better Christian. (Young India: January 19, 1928)

 

Welcome Them Back

 

If a person through fear, compulsion, starvation, or for material gain or consideration goes over to another faith, it is a misnomer to call it conversion. Most cases of conversion have been to my mind a false coin. I would therefore unhesitatingly re-admit to the Hindu fold all such repentants without much ado. If a man comes back to the original branch, he deserves to be welcomed in so far as he may deem to have erred, he has sufficiently purged himself of it when he repents his error and retraces his steps. (Collected Works: Vol. 66, pp. 163-164)

 

Hindustan needs to be made a Hindu raashtra.

Hindustan needs to be made a Hindu raashtra.

The Vedic dharma is universal religion for mankind. It is tolerant of all the tolerant faiths. Therefore, Bhaarat does not need “Secularism” which is European medicine against Christianity. – skanda987

 —

From: KatariaN@aol.com

VIDEO OF THE HEART-RENDING SPEECH DELIVERED

BY SHRI TAPAN GHOSH.

 

MUST FOR EVERY PATRIOT HINDU WHO WANTS TO DO SOMETHING FOR HIS/HER PUNIYA BHOOMI BHARAT

 

OUR HEARTY CONGRATULATIONS TO SHRI TAPAN GHOSH.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-1Olyn15Xk

(one hour video)

RESPECTED COLLEAGUES:

Enclosed herewith please find a passionate but logical speech delivered by Shri Tapan Ghosh of Hindu Samhati, Kolkata.

 

Shri Tapan Ghosh cogently argues that since Bharat was divided in 1947 on the basis of two nation theory how come Hindus are still being insulted and treated like second class citizens in their own country and Muslims are pampered by the Government of India.

 

Tapan Da firmly believes and cautions Hindus that Secularism as practiced in India will obliterate Hinduism from Indian soil and will pave the way for Islamization of Bharat.

 

Narain Kataria

 

 

Saraswati Vandanaa – Let’s Adore Saraswati!

Saraswati Vandanaa – Let’s Adore Saraswati!

Paa-wa-kaa nah Saraswatee, vaaje-bhir vaaji-nee-watee

Yajyäm washtu dhiyaa-vasuh

पावका नः सरस्वती वाजेभिर् वाजिनीवती

यज्याम् वश्तु धियावसुः

 

Veda is called Saraswati because It overflows with Knowledge. Veda has an abundance of nourishing resources for us and is rich in intelligence and action. Through its vital resources, It purifies us.  May Veda desire to make our Life-Sacrifice complete.

 

Choda-yi-tree soo-nri-taa-naam, chetantee su-matee-naam

Yajyäm dadhe Saraswatee

चोदयित्री सूनृतानाम् चेतंती सुमतीनाम्

यज्याम् दधे सरस्वते

Veda inspires in us words that are truthful, sweet and healing.  She also awakens in us thoughts that are filled with grace and compassion.  May Veda uphold our Life-Sacrifice.

 

Maho arnah Saraswatee, pra-cheta-ya-ti ketu-naa

Dhiyo vishwaa vi raajati – Rig Veda 1:3:10-12

महो अर्नः सरस्वती प्रचेतयति केतुना

धियो विश्वा वि राजति – Rig Veda 1:3:10-12

 

When we act on Veda, when we read, study and teach Veda, a vast Ocean of Knowledge opens up itself. This Knowledge, in a very special way, illumines the intelligence of everyone.

 

Come, let us all glorify Mother Saraswati.  In the first of these three Mantras, Veda is called Saraswati because It overflows with various kinds of Knowledge – physical, social, natural, health, psychological, spiritual and other sciences. When we productively apply these sciences, Veda enhances our life-style, taking away inconveniences, shortcomings and flawed tendencies from our daily experience. Veda possesses an abundance of resources to strengthen our body, mind, intellect and ego.  These resources include food, wealth, strength, speed, energy and vitality, and scientific knowledge. In being read and studied, Veda inspires us to make productive use of these resources, face up to challenges in life, act intelligently, perform our required duties and successfully find a place of acceptance in society.  In view of blessings that it has to offer us, we ask that Veda help us make our earthly sojourn complete.

 

We are told in the second Mantra that Veda creates in us inclinations to speak words that are sweet, truthful and healing and to think thoughts that are gracious and compassionate. Parents at home must speak honey-like words to each other. Siblings must act harmoniously with, and not hate, each other, and speak words productive of benevolence.[1] This is the Vedic formula for a successful family. Individuals make up a family, families make up a neighborhood, neighborhoods make up a village and a town, towns make up a city, cities make up a state, states make up a country, and countries make up the world.  If families can register peace, grace and benevolence in their home interactions, the whole world will consequently be peaceful, graceful and benevolent. So, we cherish the sentiment that Veda, filled with strategies for success in family, society and country, may uphold, nurture and nourish our individual life, so that all of us at home create and enjoy a harmonious interconnectedness. Let’s demonstrate that life at home can be truly synonymous with harmony.

 

The third Mantra informs that through activity, through the act of intensely reciting, studying and teaching the Veda, a vast Ocean of Knowledge opens up itself in front of us. There are 20,358 Mantras contained in the Rig, Yajur, Saam and Atharva Vedas. The sum-total knowledge of the Veda is so vast that it takes an equally vast collection of auxiliary literature to explain it to mankind.[2] In ancient times, a student was required to study Veda and its extended auxiliary literature to be considered a scholar.  This Knowledge illumines the minds of all who seek Wisdom.

 

Word-For-Word Meaning

Saraswatee  – Veda [see Nighantu ]; Vaaji-neewatee – is filled with vital resources;  Vaajebhih – with these resources;  Nah Paawakah – She is our purifier;  Dhiyaa-vasuh iti Karma-vasuh [See Nirukta 11:26] – rich in action; Washtu – May she desire; Yajyäm – our sacrifice; Chodayitree – She is the inspirer; Soonritaanaam – of sweet words; Chetantee – She is the awakener; Sumateenaam – of gracious thoughts;  Dadhe – May She uphold; Yajyäm – our sacrifice; Ketunaa – through activity; Prachetayati – She makes visible; Mahah Arnah – a vast ocean; Vi raajati – She illumines; Vishwaa Diyah – everyone’s intelligence.

 


[1] Anuvratah pituh putro, maatraa bhawatu sam-manaah

Jaayaa patye madhu-mateem, vaacham vadatu shanti-waam

Maa bhraataa bhraataram dwikshan, maa swasaaram uta swasaa

Sanyanchah sa-vrataa bhootwaa, vaacham vadata bhadrayaa -AV 3:30:2-3

अनुव्रतः पितुः पुत्रो मात्रा भवतु सम्मनाः

जाया पत्ये मधुमतीम् वाचम् वदतु शन्तिवाम्

मा भ्राता भ्रातरम् द्विक्शन् मा स्वसारम् उत स्वसा

सन्यंचः सव्रता भोत्वा वाचम् वदत भद्रया -AV 3:30:2-3

[2] This includes books called Brahmanas, Aranyakas, Upanishads, Pratishakhyas,  Sutras, Darshanas, and books on Grammar, Etymology, Ritual, Prosody, Astronomy, etc.

 

Satish Prakash, PhD, Vyakaranacharya

Founder-Acharya, Maharshi Dayananda Gurukula

Missionary of the Arya Samaj

 

No need for reservation for Muslims in Bhaarat

No need for reservation for Muslims in Bhaarat

From: J. G. Arora <jgarora@gmail.com>

Dear friends,

Namaste.

With reference to Shri Agniveer’s excellent mail / write-up regarding Swami Ram Dev’s alleged statement supporting reservation for Muslims in government jobs and educational institutions, following facts are submitted for your kind consideration:

1. If swami Ram Dev’s alleged statement supporting reservation for Muslims is true, it is very unfortunate; and it demolishes Swami Ram Dev’s credibility among the nationalists. Moreover, it defies logic and Bharat’s history.

2. Bharat Varsha including the present day India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Afghanistan and even Zabol in Iran was Hindu land with zero Muslim population till 711 when Muhammad bin Qasim’s Arab army attacked Sindh. Defending their motherland valiantly during repeated Muslim attacks for over a thousand years, Hindus lost areas now known as Afghanistan in 987, and Pakistan and Bangladesh to Muslims in 1947 besides losing millions of lives, and suffering destruction and plunder of thousands of their temples.

3. Proponents of Muslim reservation forget how Muslims had demanded and obtained Pakistan for Muslims in 1947.

Formed in 1906, Muslim League demanded Pakistan on March 23, 1940 with Muhammad Ali Jinnah proclaiming that Hindus and Muslims belonged to two different religions, civilizations and nations which could never live together in one country; and demanding Pakistan, a separate country for Muslims, comprising Muslim majority areas in India.

4. In 1945-46 elections, Muslims overwhelmingly voted for creation of Pakistan. In 1947, the Muslims got a third of Bharat’s land as Pakistan. In 1971, East Pakistan became Bangladesh while West Pakistan was renamed as Pakistan.

5. Both Pakistan and Bangladesh are Islamic Republics and have driven out most of Hindus and Sikhs from their land.  However, most of Indian Muslims who had demanded Pakistan and exchange of population did not go to Pakistan. Rather, the present percentage of Muslim population in India is much higher than that in 1947.

After the creation of Pakistan, Indian Muslims can have rights only as Indians and not as Muslims; and any reservation for Muslims in truncated India is untenable.

6. Logically in 1947, on India’s partition on religious basis and creation of Pakistan for Muslims as demanded by Muslims, truncated Bharat should have been declared a Hindu republic to re-assert its Hindu identity. However, a perverse ‘secularism’ was foisted on Bharat where anything which is anti-Hindu, pro-Muslim, divisive, sectarian, and even anti-national is ‘secularism’.

7. Hindus have already lost the lands now known as Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan which used to be Hindu lands.  And because of unchecked infiltration of Pak-Bangla nationals, and foreign-funded conversions, with each passing day, even the truncated India is being made more Islamic and more Christian and less Hindu.

8. Since fake-secular India has proved to be a disaster for Hindus, nationalists must transform ‘pseudo-secular’ India into genuinely secular Hindu Bharat wherein there will be one law and one nation; no distinction of majority and minority; no discrimination against any community; and same rights for all citizens.

9. What is required is not the reservation for Muslims but an end of the politics of divisive appeasement which is demolishing India and creating pre-1947 situation which would dismember India further.

10. In order to crush daily Pak-Bangla demographic aggression, to prevent the creation of more Pakistans and Bangladeshs on Indian soil, to ensure justice to all and appeasement of none, to give good governance, and to protect Hinduism, Hindu civilization, Hindu heritage and Hindu identity of truncated India, all nationalist individuals and social and religious organizations must actively participate in politics and transform  the fake-secular India into a genuinely secular Hindu Republic of Bharat by all peaceful, constitutional and lawful means.

11. No one can have any valid objection to the declaration of Bharat as a Hindu country when all the 57 Muslim majority countries are declared as Islamic countries.

I shall be grateful for your views in the matter.

Shubham astu,

J.G. Arora

From: Agniveer Agni <agniveer@gmail.com>
Arora ji,
Very valid points (you) raised. Our take on this point by point:

1. We agree it defies logic and Bharat’s history. We communicated with Ramdevji’s organizations, but have received responses that indicate that they are defiant on their stand and call us traitors, prostitutes etc for opposing him on this issue.

2. The history since Qasim plundered is indeed brutal. So any policy framework in country should incentivize and encourage people to realign with their original roots. This must be done compassionately, justly and sincerely.

3. We have lost major parts of our territory to separatists. Any move to encourage separatism or appease those who consider non-believers as Kafirs destined for eternal Hell should be strongly opposed.

4. Partition was a blunder. We should have been brave enough to ensure no division of oldest nation of world and deal with our internal problems like Shivaji. Tomorrow we may partition yet another part of India if population of separatists increases.

5. India should take ownership of Hindus and Sikhs in Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan. They are suffering because of blunders of our forefathers. Tomorrow if Delhi is termed an Islamic nation separate from India by few politicians, and then my granddaughter is raped like it is happening in Pakistan today, it is definitely a fault of those who arbitrarily made me Kafir in my own motherland.

6. We don’t bother much about India being declared Hindu rashtra on paper. That, if happens, is most welcome. After all Hindu represents a noble way of life. But more importantly, India must be a country that safeguards interests of all Hindus of the world and has no room for appeasement. Secularism is ok till it allows personal freedom to profess any religion. The moment it starts causing population of majority peacefuls to dwindle, it turns into pseudo-secularism.

7. Infiltrators should be pushed out, or Bangladesh be officially made part of India. Any intermediate step of feeding parasites at expense of poor Indians is anti-national.

8. Exactly. Uniform Civil and Criminal Code.

9. Further, any minority group that claims that whosoever does not follow their religion is worst of creatures or will go to Hell forever should be banned.

10. The problem with politics today is that it thrives on chamchagiri of existing politicians, or unethical appeasement, or money-power precluding possibility of any sincere competent person joining. So we have either personality cults or gundaraaj. We believe this would take time to change the patterns. But we should be open to moments of opportunities.

11. More than declaration, there should be changes in laws and procedures. If that happens over a period of time, and we evolve into a non-appeasing rationally driven country, rest would automatically happen.

Dhanyavad

 

Kashmir History

From:  Deva Samaroo <devasamaroo@hotmail.com>

 

No civilization is conquered from without
until it has destroyed itself from within

THE KASHMIR ISSUE

 

It was the implosion from within that empowered Mahmood of Ghazni to invade Punjab in 1101 AD and slaughter Hindu Kings, thus paving the way for the Islamization of India.   After the Mughals, the British East India Company came, then the British Crown, and then the Nehrus, then the Mainos, and then who knows who else is coming.


Kashmir has everything precious to India’s heritage. It has been a nursery of learning and religion, has a breath-taking landscape as if painted to perfection by the Master Painter. It is a place of pilgrimage for Hindus and also Buddhists. Millions of pilgrims present themselves and prostrate at the feet of Mata Vaishnav Devi, Mata Ragya Khsheer Bhawani, Rajarajeshwari Mahatripursundari, Jagadamba Mata Sharika and above all Lord Shiva and Parvati in the Amarnath Cave in the lovable lap of Himalayas. After draining the lake and creating the Kashmir Valley, Rishi Kashyap blessed his creation with the celestial river Vitasta.
Up to the beginning of fourteenth century, Kashmiris were living in peace, co-existence, and tolerance and were mostly devoted to spiritual and academic pursuits. Kashmir was the abode of Hindus, who were devoted to contemplation and higher learning. They are the original natives of the Valley of Kashmir. These Hindus popularly known as Pandits are a part of the Vedic heartland of India and have lived in Kashmir from times immemorial and have a history dating back beyond the Neelmat era. The Hindu religious percepts have borne the message of universal peace, brotherhood and co-existence of all creeds and faiths. The Hindus of Kashmir are progenitors of Shaivite monism and Hinyan and Sarvastavadin Buddhism which spread to Central Asia, Tibet and Western China. They propounded the great Shaivite doctrine of Trika and the theory of recognition. A Kashmiri Hindu is a spiritualist to the core. Since ages his urge for Sat Chit Anand, together with the environs he was in, has made him a colossus. He never did believe in material comforts though he did procure all, but with all that, his subconscious was always booked to something most profound and subtle. A Kashmiri Hindu has the strength to get in plenty but, above all, he is strong enough to leave and renounce everything with grace. This has been his forte since ages. This is not his cowardice. It is his innate human Divine strength. He perceived the world as unreal and still believes it so. But even with all this he never compromised with his basic cultural and religious moorings come what may. A Kashmiri Hindu’s culture is part and parcel of his spiritual activity that he always had and still has utmost importance for it. Religion being tuned to his peculiar environs followed suit. No wonder a Kashmiri Pandit’s cultural and spiritual pursuits moulded his religion in such a way that he had to create his Ganga sangam (at Shadipur confluence of Sindhu and Vitasta), Sharda Peeth, Jyotir Lingas etc. in Satisar, i.e. Kashmir only. This aspect has been reflected in almost all of India’s regions where local customs have intermingled with religion. A Kashmiri Hindu’s nature has always been cosmopolitan. No wonder this percolated in Indian ethos as Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam. (World is a big family). The snow-capped mountain peaks around the Valley evoked the image of Shiva (Shivpuri). The worship of Shiva and study of Shaivism is, therefore, a predominant theme in the religious and philosophic practice of the Kashmiri Hindus. The beginning of Shivasana or Shivagama can be traced to the beginning of Vedic revelations.
The Shankaracharya temple atop about 1000 feet high hillock of the same name is to the south-east of Srinagar. Ringed by the perennially snow-bound mountain peaks, the magnificent Dal Lake and the zig-zagging Vitasta (Jhelum) flowing placidly through the heart of the ancient city of Srinagar and the temple commands a fascinating bird’s eye-view of the city and the celestial Valley. The Shiva temple a massive stone structure is built on a high octagonal plinth strictly in accordance with Hindu tradition. The temple has 84 recesses on its exterior and is surrounded by a parapet well enabling devotees to have the Parikrama of the temple safely. The stairs leading to the sanctum santorum number 36, first flight of 18 steps followed by 12 steps and again followed by six steps on either side of the landing terminating the second flight. This total of 36 steps is also in accordance with Hindu tradition, 36 denoting as many elements of which cosmos is made, viz. Shiva Tattva to the Prithvi Tattva.
The hillock, according to Tarikh-i-Hassan, (pp 394-496, Vol. II) and (Waquiai Kashmir of Mulla Ahmed was known originally as Anjana and later as Jeth Ludrak and the temple was built by King Sandhiman of the Gonanda dynasty of Kashmir (471-536 Laukek Era), corresponding to 2605-2540 B.C. He gave the name Jeshteshwara to the temple and the hillock came to be known as Sandhiman Parbat after the name of the King. According to Dr. Stein, translator of Kalhana’s Rajtarangani, King Gopadityas (369-309 B.C.) repaired the temple and donated two villages, the present Gupkar and Buchhwara (Bhaksira Vatika) for the maintenance of the temple. This time the hillock was given the name Gopadari or Gopa Hill. This name and Jeshteshwara for the temple prevailed till the Kashmiris dedicated the temple to the sweet memory of Adi Shankaracharya, who visited Kashmir and stayed at the temple complex. This is confirmed by Tarikh-i-Hassan (pp.80-82, Vol.I), although there is some confusion about the dates of Adi Shankaracharya’s visit to Kashmir. However, after the dedication, the temple and hill came to be known as the Shankaracharya temple and hill after the great sage and scholar from the south of the country. After the first repairs to the temple carried out by King Gopaditya, King Lalitaditya (697-734 A.D.) repaired it.
The original Shiva Lingam in the temple, along with over 300 precious idols of Gods and Godesses therein and other structures and residential quarters around the temple, were destroyed by Sultan Sikandar (the iconoclast), who ruled Kashmir between 1389 and 1413 .D. King Zain-ul-Abedin (1420 to 1470 A.D.) repaired the temple and its dome, which had been damaged by an earthquake, as a gesture of goodwill towards the Hindus of Kashmir, who had been persecuted by his father and grandfather. Sheikh Ghulam Mohi-ud-din the Governor of Sikh ruler of Punjab (1841-1846 A.D.) also repaired the temple in his own tome. Later, Maharaja Ranbir Singh, the second Dogra ruler of Kashmir repaired the temple once again and installed the present Lingam in it. Later, a saint from Nepal and Swami Shiv rattan Gir Saraswati, who had his seat at Durganag temple complex, carried out some repairs to the temple. The Maharaja of Indore electrified the temple during the forties of this century and installed a dazzling flash-light on its top, making it conspicuous during the night also.
The temple was originally connected with Vitasta (Jhelum) near the temple of Goddess Tripursundari on the right bank of the river, now known as Shurahyaar (Shudash Dashyar) by a finely sculptured stone stair overlooking the present Badami Bagh Cantonment of Sonawar. This flight of steps was dismantled by King Jehangir and the stones were used by his queen, Nur Jehan, who built a huge mosque, known as Pathar Masjid near Zaina Kadal in Srinagar. The mosque was never used for prayers by Muslims (Sunnies) as it had been built by a woman belonging to the Shia sect. The temple was approached via a bridle path from the Durganag temple at the base of the hillock. This path was later electrified by the Daramath Trust. In early seventies, however, when the Central Government, at the persuasion of the State Government, put up the T.V. tower on the Dal Lake side of the hillock, a road was constructed to connect the tower with the lake near Nehru Park. Later, the Dharamarth Trust laid a flight of about 599 chiseled stone-steps, with side walls and landings, to connect the T.V. tower with the temple. That way the temple was lately approached both via the bridle path starting from Darganag temple and via the T.V. tower road.
Mrs. Walter Tibbits in her book, The Cities seen in East and West, says in the chapter The City of Sun that: “The hill is rough and jagged as the path of yoga (the Path of Union with God). The elements have stained its every shade of ochre, the color sacred to the lord of Universe. Sharp rocks break the path as the trills of the way out and wound the feet of the aspirant of knowledge. On its summit stands in simple, solemn dignity a small fane of grey stone. Its columns are fluted, its dome is round, surrounded by a trident. Inside if one thing only, an upright black stone… The Lingam is the oldest religious symbol of the world. It is also the simplest. But to the Shaivait, no gorgeous imagery of the Mass, no elaborate ceremonial of Mecca, can compare with the solemnity of that black stone… Guardian of the austere glories of Maheshwara, crowning of the fort-like hill, high, serene, ascetic, bearing no ornament save that of the quiet spirit of Shiva
himself, the Jeshtrudra shall command the Happy Valley long after we and those that come shall have passed away”.
Calling the Shankaracharya hill as koh-i-Sulaiman and ancient temple thereon as Takht-i-Sulaiman is a later day ruse started sometime in the 19th century by some fanatical Muslims of Kashmir to complete the process of Islamization of the historically known places of Hindu worship in the Valley and also to bury deep forever the Hindu past of Kashmir. It is in line with the demolition of the then famous Hindu temple of Maharshi (Vishnu) and the erection thereon of a structure known now as Jama Masjid, conversion of the Mahakali Temple near Fatehkdal, Srinagar into the present Shah-i-Hamadan mosque, and the Ekadasharudra (Shiva) temple in Khanyar, Srinagar into the Ziarat Dastgir Sahib, not to speak of hundreds of temples throughout the Valley which were earlier destroyed completely or converted into mosques, ziarats and dargahs, during the Muslim rule in Kashmir (14th to 18th century A.D.)
The Shankaracharya Hill, and the temple on top of it, is the most attractive, conspicuous and one of the oldest monuments still there in the Valley. It surely attracts attention of any one visiting Srinagar, and may be, reminds him of the glorious Hindu past of Kashmir. It would perhaps fulfill the dream of many fundamentalists of Kashmir to have an Arabic style mosque in its place as the most prominent landmark on the process of Islamization of the Valley. As it is, the half a million of Hindus of Kashmir, the descendants of the pre-Muslim Kashmiris have been hounded out of the Kashmir, which is at present virtually like any other Muslim country ruled over by gun-totting terrorists, trained and abetted by Pakistan. The conversion of the Shankaracharya Temple into a mosque or a ziarat would surely add to the present single-hued portrait of Kashmir as the door to the Islamic world to its west and north, which is claimed to be one of the objectives of separatism and terrorism. Farooq Abdullah cannot just be faulted with any knowledge or understanding of history. An accident of history pushed him into politics and later placed him in the Chief Minister’s chair. And now when he has been discarded by the Muslims, his reference to Shankaracharya Temple having been Takht-i-Sulaiman at the national Integration Council meeting in June, 1992, can be said to have been aimed at wooing these Muslims as also presenting himself as a champion of secularism to the gathering of like-minded Hindu-bashers at that time. What is, however, far more stunning about this hyperbole of Dr. Farooq Abdullah at the N.I.C. meeting, is the speed with which a prominent journalist Shri Inder Malhotra, took the wrong cue and proceeded to thrash the Hindu communalists, on the basis of a patently incorrect remark of Farooq, and without verifying the facts. Journalists and intellectuals, particularly the high profile and respected among them, are supposed to educate and guide their countrymen on the basis of historical facts and truths and not allow themselves to be swayed by momentary political winds which can change course without any advance signal or warning. It is hoped that Shri Malhotra has since updated his knowledge about the Shankaracharya Hill and Temple: the sooner the better. The following stanza from the Old Testament to appreciate that King Solomon never visited Kashmir, not to speak of his having ever established the Takht-i-Sulaiman (Solomon’s Throne) on the Sulaiman Teng (Solomon’s Mound) in Srinagar:
1. Solomon succeeded his father, David as King and his royal power was firmly established (1 king 2:14).
2. He was king of Jerusalem, over all Israel for forty years (1 King 11.42)
3. He died and was buried in David’s city and his son Rehomoam succeeded him as king (1 king 11.43)
And that was around 950 B.C. when Islam was nowhere on the scene. There is absolutely no mention in Hebrew texts of King Solomon having ever visited Kashmir and established his throne on the Shankaracharya Hill. This is just an assumption, a recent creation for ulterior motives and with malafide intentions. There is no mention of any Solomon in the pre-Islamic annals of Kashmir.
The world famous Indologist and archaeologist, Dr. Stein has said in his translation of Kalhana’s Rajatarangani (Page 43, Vol.II) that “the present name of the hill meaning Solomon’s Throne (Takht-i-Sulaiman) is undoubtedly of Mohammedan origin…that the ancient designation of the hill was Gopadari, is proved beyond all doubt…in Kalhana’s chronicle”. Professor Sahebzada Ghulam Hassan, author of Tarikhi Hassan (History of Kashmir) also confirms categorically that the name Kohi Sulaiman is given to the hill by Muslims. Fergusson, in his book History of Indian Architecture (page 282) says that the temple on Gopadari (now Shankaracharya) is one of the earliest buildings in Kashmir. The tradition of Abul Fazal’s time also distinctly attributes the temple to the time of King Gopaditya (369-309 B.C.).
The claim that King Solomon ever visited Kashmir and established his throne anywhere in the Valley is obviously false and motivated. It is just a part of a preposterous conspiracy going on in Kashmir, on official level as well, to somehow obliterate the Hindu past of Kashmir, which for all practical purposes stands adequately enshrined in Rajatarangini by Kalhana, the Waquiai Kashmir by Mulla Ahmed, the Ratnakar Purana, by Ratnakar Pandit, the Tarikhi Hassan by Sahebzada Ghulam Hassan, and the writings of Dr. Stein, Fergusson, and the dozens of others both foreign and Kashmiri. The conspiracy was furthered about a decade back when Sheikh Abdullah changed, in one stroke, the old Kashmiri names of as many as 800 villages. The separatists have now started calling another hillock in Srinagar, the Hari Parbat on which stands the ancient shrine dedicated to Mother Goddess (the eighteen-armed Sharika), as Koh-i-Maraan. The hundred year old internationally-known library of the State Research and Publications Department, which housed many rare books and manuscripts in Sanskrit and Sharda scripts, has been closed and the valuable materials, put haphazardly into gunny bags have been dumped somewhere in the godowns of Kashmir University to rot.
It would be quite appropriate to mention here of the recommendations of the Glancy Commission, constituted by Maharaja Hari Singh, after the communal riots engineered by the then Kashmir Muslim Conference in 1931, that “it is evident that both the Shankaracharya Hill (including Durganag temple) and Hari Parbat Hill belong to Kashmiri Pandits” (Page 4 of Glancy Commission Report). The Report also assured that “the areas that were vacant on the hills and on the plains in Shankaracharya and Hari Parbat area were to remain intact and in possession of the Pandit community, which no non-Pandit could encroach, occupy or build upon”. Unfortunately, these exclusive Hindu areas have been encroached upon and usurped extensively after 1947, revenue records tampered with, and almost all areas stand build upon now. In this context it would be proper to make a mention of ancient Bhairav Nath Temple at Chhatabal, Srinagar, which remains under police lock and key since 1972 as some Muslims of the area came to claim half of this prime land belonging to the shrine located on the meeting point of river Vitasta and the river Dood Ganga. A Divisional Commissioner of Kashmir once told a Hindu delegation that they would better come to a settlement with the Muslims, or he would be constrained to convert the area into a public park. As against this, when Kashmiri Hindus could, during the Sikh and Dogra regimes in J&K, retaliate against the excesses committed on them by successive Muslim Sultans and Governors, the Hindus demonstrated unforgettable magnanimity and large-heartedness, and a deep sense of peaceful co- existence. Here is what a renowned Kashmiri historian, based in Pakistan, had to say about the sagacity of the Kashmiri Hindus:
“It is to the lasting credit of Pandit Birbal Dhar that when a deputation of Muslims headed by Sayyid Hassan Shah Quadri Khanyari approached him to dissuade the Sikhs from the destruction of the Khanaqah-i-Shahi-Hamadan; he moved in the matter, used his influence and saved the historic structure from vandalism..” (Page 726 of Kashmir by Dr. Sufi.)  Farooq Abdullahs and Inder Malhotras may kindly keep in mind that history cannot be changed by making off-the-cuff remarks. “History in no blind goddess and does not excuse the blindness in others.”
Abhinava Gupta was one of the most outstanding Acharyas of the Shaiva philosophy. He lived in Kashmir in the 10th century A.D. The versatility of his genius was recognized in his own time. He was called the Shankaracharya of Kashmir.
The Kashyap Bhoomi now called Kashmir, nestling in the outer Himalayas, has been alluring to itself invaders and bandits, saints and sages, scholars and preachers and travelers and lovers of nature alike for ages past. The core socio-religious group of this blend, Kashmiri Hindus, developed into a distinct cultural organism, favored by geographical fastness and climatic rigors. It impregnated this land of the gods, the cradle of the holy Vitasta with the springs of love, amity and peaceful co-existence. It always maintained a subtle as well as a gross relationship with the Indian mainstream. In fact, Hindu society of the sub-continent remained an umbrella, a super cultural dynamo for this Kashmiri society. Ramayan, Mahabharat, Srimad Bhagvat, and the full galaxy of Indian saints and scholars always nourished and sustained Kashmiris in their pursuit of meaning in life. A pilgrimage to Kashmir is El Dorado for a Hindu living anywhere. Kashmiri ethos never got detached from its moorings as recorded in the noble utterances of the anonymous sages of our Upanishads and the Vedic lore. Among the most profound principles enshrined in these texts is the cultivation of an open mind in the realm of the spirit: “Truth is one, though the sages have called it by various names”, and that all faiths deserve our respect.
Kashmiris are descendents of Rishis and Munis like Dev Vashishta, Bharadwaja, Dattatriya Munishwar etc. etc. and such names are being repeated and commemorated at the time of religious rites, dharmic functions, sradhs etc. by Kashmiris according to their gotras. Pandit means a very learned Hindu, authority on some subject or a learned teacher. History has subjected Kashmiris to severe test and taught them to bear their lot with patience and fortitude. Deeply religious, the Kashmiri Pandit has never met violence with violence. Infinitely tolerant and liberal towards people of other faiths, there is hardly any instance in the history of Kashmir when the Pandits expressed their disapproval of the religious practices of other faiths. To Kashmiris, the numerous holy springs, the blue mountain lakes and silvery peaks of the majestic mountains have been sacred shrines of their five thousand years long ancestry during which Kashmir emerged as the Sharda Peeth a hallowed place for ancient learning. To be known as Kashmiri Pandit is not to be recognized as a person subscribing to clannish mediocrity, but a matter of pride for those who sought over the centuries to shape a distinct style of life by contributing knowledge and learning, despite unheard of cruelty and tyranny suffered by them at the hands of cruel rulers, who came to spread Islam. The pathways through which members of the Kashmiri community passed, in their escape of tyranny of religious bigots, six hundred years ago, are mute witnesses to the immense sufferings the Kashmiri has undergone to preserve and upheld his distinctive style and heritage. During the five thousand years of history, they have made colossal contribution to world civilization in the field of religion, philosophy, Sanskrit literature, medicine, history, aesthetics etc. As model of non-violence, they have never handled lethal weapons or spoken harsh words. Devoted to the study of Vedas and other Shastras in all their aspects, the essence of these studies has been coursing in their blood stream from generation to generation. In peaceful or turbulent times they were protected under the spiritual umbrella by a large number of highly advanced saints and sages who flourished in the Valley from time to time. No wonder, they preferred death to change their religion and withstood stoically the ruthless monsters of five hundred years of Muslim rule. And when pushed back to the wall, they migrated to places of safety in the hot plains of India. Till recently Kashmiri Hindus were using Saptrishi era and even now have retained it symbolically.
The Hindus of Kashmir were models of simplicity, purity, truthfulness, ascetic tendency and compassion. All these traits of the highest human culture were built up by the Rishis and Maharishis who, in their secluded Ashrams, performed austere penances and at the same time taught a large number of students who stayed in the Ashrams and led a life befitting a Brahmin Brahmachari. The children of the households lived with Acharyas in the latter’s homes. There they used to serve their teacher by gathering fuel for homes and offered morning and evening prayers. The recitation of Vedic hymns with proper accents, preceded by the syllable OM took place at day break. Upanayanam Sanskara, which literally means taking the child to the Guru, was the most important in one’s life. (The) rishis and param-rishis, in their Ashrams and seats of learning, propagated gems of philosophy, art, literature and history. Apart from imparting teaching to Kashmiri students, they instructed numerous scholars from entire Bharat, who braving long and arduous journey came to Kashmir to drink deep from the well of knowledge at the feet of the masters. No wonder that from the remote ages, Kashmir became the seat of learning and earned for itself the appropriate name of Sharda Peeth or the seat of Sharada, the goddess of Learning and Fine Arts. Apart from performing rites and rituals, as prescribed by the Shastras, the householders worshipped the Hindu Triad, namely Shiva, Vishnu and Bramha and their Consorts, Parvati or Uma who has a variety of other names such as Kali, Durga, Mahadevi, Gauri (the Consort of Shiva); Shri or Lakshmi (the Consort of Vishnu) and Vageshwari or Saraswati (Consort of Bramha). A long list of Shivacharyas (Kashmir’s Shaivism being the crest jewel in the firmament of Indian metaphysical world) and learned teachers of the hoary past at Sharada Peeth, are but a few examples that do proud to this patriotic, but unfortunate, persecuted Pandit who continues to be driven to desperation with his back to the wall. His main forte has been learning, which assumed a high profile in the past when Hinduism reigned supreme in Kashmir, in centre of excellence at Sharada Peeth – ancient but now defunct seat of learning on the banks of Krishna Ganga in the Valley of Mount Harmukh (mouth of Lord Shiva) (now under Pakistani occupation). It provided instruction to the scholars from as far away as Kerala, thus cementing the bonds of emotional integration of the people.
The appellation Bhatta is a remnant reminder of the honorific that went with the degree Bhatta – awarded to graduates coming out of the portals of this prestigious institution. Kashmiri language had an indigenous script. Its fate has been decided in the earlier chapter. Activities, as always, in Hindu and patriotic Kashmir, reasoned to the rhythm of the ebb and flow of the Indian society – the mother current of all that has flowed in this land of Vedanta proclaiming unity and harmony of all life. Contribution of Bhatta (Kashmiri Pandits) touched a high in the past when they were not forced to run for their lives, their footsteps always dogged by anti-human and anti-cultural forces. Therefore, they have a proud past and still possess a vast potential for still better achievements in the service of this great country and humanity at large, provided they are able to discern their future in its appropriate perspective, beckoning them to sincere and catholic
efforts. In their overall setting of their Kashmiriat, Kashmiri Hindus, who had to flee the Valley in medieval times, successfully maintained their social identity. They continued to maintain some tenuous social links with their erstwhile mountain-grit homeland and apart from and in spite of their handicap of being unable to maintain their mother-tongue, they faithfully observed all rituals associated with all their mundane and sacred functioning as Kashmiri Saraswat Brahmins.
Kashmir’s devastation began in the early fourteenth century. The Hindu King, Udyan Deva, true to Kashmir’s traditional hospitality, gave shelter to a runaway Muslim, Shah Mir Khorasani. In fact, the Hindu rulers would give refuge to any person in trouble or peril. Udyan Deva passed away in 1338. His queen, Kota Rani, did everything to maintain her rule. But that was not to be. True to pattern, the man for whom her husband had done everything to keep him comfortable, turned tables against her. He conspired to get Kota Rani imprisoned at Anderkot, where she had gone to look into the grievances of the people of the area. He released Kota Rani after he had captured the throne and established his sway. He asked Kota Rani to become his wife. On her blunt refusal, she was forcibly put into his harem. But this dethroned Kashmiri monarch, upholding the honor of her person and of entire womanhood, like Rani Padmini, gave a big slap to the treacherous Mir and killed herself instantly soon after she was forced into his bed. Thus came to an end peace and harmony in Kashmir. This was the beginning of dark days for Kashmir and Kashmiri people were subjected to brutal persecution and forcibly converted to Islam. What happened during this period is a tragic saga of Evil perpetrated upon the people of the kingdom. Starting with the prolonged rape of the entire length and breadth of the Valley earlier Changeez Khan and Halaku had raided the Valley and later on Dulacha or Dulcha (Zulqadr Khan) a Tartar chief from Turkistan who laid waste the land and another by Achala, another Turkish leader ruined its people entirely. What little was left to complete the picture of death and destruction was taken over by Sultan Sikandar. The sacred threads of assassinated Hindus weighing dozens of maunds were burnt. The invading hordes were bordering on absolute illiteracy and barbarism beat all records in the history of mankind in matters of inflicting tyranny and cruelty on Hindus of Kashmir. Those who resisted vigorously were tied back to back, put into sacks and then thrown into the pristine waters of the Dal Lake to meet their watery grave. The prominent Hindus were forcibly locked in cattle sheds, which were filled with smoke emanating from the burning cow dung. The cruel leader agreed to free them only if they cursed their religion and embraced Islam. Sikandar, who took pride in calling himself Iconoclast, the fourth ruler of Shamiri dynasty openly, confronted Kashmiris with choice between conversion to Islam or death. Most of the Kashmiris were converted to Islam on point of sword and all their temples including marvelous Sun Temple at Martand and majestic Vijeshwar (Bijbehara) were destroyed by this brute. The Bhatta Mazaar, the graveyard of Hindus, the name given to the bund across Dal Lake made on the dead bodies of the victims of Islamic fanaticism is a gory reminder of that dark period in the long and chequered history of Kashmir. The places Bhatawath i.e. path of Battas (Pandits) now pronounced as Batote on the Jammu Srinagar highway and Kashtwar or Kasht-niwar. I.e. remover of troubles, on the other side of the Valley in Jammu region had provided refuge to the fleeing and frightened Kashmiris from the Valley. The Sultan destroyed Hindu temples and Hindu shrines and burnt rare Hindu scriptures with a ferocious vengeance. He set the trend for spoilation of temples, defiling the images and usurpation of the valuables. Noted historian, Ghulam Hassan has recorded, “Since the days of Hindu kings, a large number of wonderful temples were existing in this land. Their architecture and construction left even very knowledgeable persons bewildered, Sikandar, through a very heavy hand, demolished all these temples from their roots. First of all continuous efforts were made for one year to destroy the Martand temple but it remained intact. Then a huge quantity of wood was piled up inside the temple and set on fire. Similarly, temples in Bijwara, numbering more than 300, were also brought down to the ground. The kali Shri temple was earlier destroyed by Sultan Qutubuddin. Sultan Sikandar constructed another mosque in its place. Sikandar made a public announcement that anyone not adopting Islam should leave the country or else would be killed. As a result, large number of Hindus migrated to different directions. Some of them got converted to Islam. Some Brahmins preferred death to Islam. All Hindu books were collected and thrown into the Dal Lake”. The original is written in Urdu.
Jawahar Lal Nehru accompanied by Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan visited the Martand temple in 1941. The Archaeological Society of India keeper showed them some black-shining blocks, replete with imagery that had escaped the devastating fire. Nehru wrung his hand in despair, saying “What did they gain by vandalizing such a great artistic treasure?” Well known British archaeologist and historian, Stein, writing about the Martand temple says: “The ruins of this splendid temple are still the most striking objects of ancient Hindu architecture in the Valley.” The temple was built by the famous King of Kashmir during 724-761 A.D. in honor of Sun God. The ruins of another temple town Awantipur, built by Utpal dynasty’s ruler, Awantivarman in 855-883 A.D. are witness to their grandeur. The demolished Martand temple, even now in its ruined state, invites comparison with Parthenon of Greece.
As the Muslim rule was consolidated in Kashmir Valley by the middle of 14th century, a large number of Kashmiris migrated to what appeared to them more congenial regions of the sub-continent. Some of them moved as far South to the Konkan coast and merged with the Saraswat Brahmins of that region. The horrifying memory of this period of tyranny has left permanent scars on the psych of Kashmiri Hindus and even now it is related that just eleven families escaped this trauma by going into hiding in the Valley. Many of the survivors returned to Kashmir during the reign of Sultan Zain-ul-Abedien, who was grandson of Sikandar the Iconoclast. Initially, he was cruel and fanatic as his grandfather. But a grave event proved to be a water-shed in his life. One day his pleasure-seeking prodigal son asked his attendants to take him along the river. In fact, he intended to go in search of new choicest pastures. It was very early in the cold morning. He spotted a young girl pouring water with flower petals into the river Vitasta. He went near her and as he began to draw her towards him by getting hold of her with his right arm, she pulled herself with a jerk, ran away and was soon lost in the lanes and bylanes. The prince returned and decided to order her formal capture by his soldiers. The girl belonged to one of the eleven Hindu families, who were in hiding. Apparently, she had been taking the risk of going to the river bank in the early mornings for samarpan or neirmaal. As soon as the prince reached his palace, he felt immense pain in his right arm. Shortly his arm became motionless and his pain, which slowly spread to other parts of the body, became unbearable. Physicians and later Maulvis were summoned to either treat him by medicine or show their miracles. Nothing was left undone. But the prince appeared to be nearing his end by each passing day. There was no respite in the cries of the prince day and night.
Sultan became restless and there was gloom all round. One day when Zain- ul-Abedien was about to go for offering his usual Namaaz, one of the attendants of the prince bowed before the Sultan and related to him the entire episode of the fateful morning. The King consulted his trusted courtiers. The girl was traced and brought to the palace. The King very politely and affectionately asked her whether she could forgive the boy and cure him. The girl in a low voice and with great modesty and obedience narrated before the King the agony of the innocent Brahmins who were in hiding. She told him that she belonged to one of these families. Her father and a few other elders, who had also been brought before the Sultan along with the girl, assured him that they could pray for the prince provided they were allowed to live freely and the threat of conversion was removed. The king joyfully agreed and issued the firman (order) immediately in this regard. The Pandits did the needful and the prince began to recover and soon he was his old self. Zain-ul-Abedien, now a fully transformed personality, announced that the Hindus who had migrated from the Valley, could return to their homes and profess their faith with full freedom. He also decreed that those who had been converted forcibly could also revert to their original faith, if they so desired.
Zain-ul-Abedien turned into a very tolerant and enlightened ruler. During his rule (1423 to 1474 A.D.) large number of Hindu migrants were recalled and rehabilitated in perfect security and honor in the towns and villages of Kashmir. Their properties were restored to them. He fully helped the Hindus to repair their vandalized places of worship and to build new temples. He appointed a Pandit, Shree Bhat as his chief advisor. Even today, after five centuries, he is on the lips of every Kashmiri whether Muslim or Hindu. He is popularly remembered as Budshah or great king. He completely abandoned the path of bigotry and fully concentrated on the well-being of his subjects and development of the Valley.
Kashmiri Hindus continued their precarious existence in their homeland under Akbar, Jehangir and Shahjehan. Some of them took to Persian studies and began to be appointed as tutors by the Mughal elite even at such far of places like Delhi and Agra. Aurangzeb’s fanaticism brought another crisis in the life of Kashmiri Hindus. They were again confronted with the choice between conversion to Islam or death. Aurangzeb was very keen for conversion of Hindus of India to Islam. According to McAuliffe, the experiment of wholesale conversion was first tried in Kashmir. The Kashmiri Pandits were well-known for their scholarship and their conversion to Islam would induce other Hindus to embrace Islam. S.M. Latif, in his History of Punjab says:
“Aurangzeb sent Iftikhar Khan as Governor of Kashmir in 1671. Iftikhar carried out the fanatical policies of Aurangzeb with great zeal. Aurangzeb’s motives in persecuting the Brahmins were obvious. The Brahmins both presented and propagated the Hindu religion and tradition. Their whole-sale conversion to Islam would have definitely helped in bringing the rest of the Hindus into the fold of Islam. The Brahmins of Kashmir were renowned for their learning and orthodoxy. The Valley of Kashmir surrounded as it was by the Muslim lands, could easily be assimilated with the rest of the Muslim India across the Attock river, North Western province, Afghanistan and Persia.”
During the 49 years of Aurangzeb’s reign, Kashmir was administered by 14 Governors. Iftikhar Khan was most cruel of all these. The Sikh tradition speaks of the atrocities against the Brahmins of Kashmir and the visits of their deputation under the leadership of Pandit Kripa Ram Dutt of Mattan to Anandpur Saheb. Seva Singh, the author of Shahid Bilas has stated:
Sorrow stricken Brahmins came to Anandpur and said: “Protect us, O Lord, the son of Guru Hargobind. Hear our pathetic pleas. Guru Tegh Bahadur – protector of the poor and the cows, you are the Prophet of the Almighty in the kalyuga. We have none to go for help. Our condition is most pitiable. protect us the way Lord Krishna protected Draupadi. We have gone from pillar to post. You are the Lord Krishna of the present age. We have no other hope. We seek refuge at thy feet. O Lord!”
Guru Tegh Bahadur, the 9th Sikh Guru heard their tale of woe. He gave them hope and courage. By telling Aurangzeb to convert him instead of the helpless Kashmiri Hindus, he drew the rage of the Mughal fanatic on him. The Guru’s martyrdom along with his companions Bhai Mati Das, Bhai Sati Das and Bhai Dayal Das at Chandni Chowk, Delhi, saved Kashmiri Hindus.
Afghans brought Kashmir under their control by 1750 A.D. and made it a province of the kingdom of Kabul. Their atrocities made life unbearable for Kashmiris. One of the Pathan governors, Asad Khan used to tie up Hindus two and two in grass sacks and sink them in the Dal Lake. Another Governor, Mir Hazar made an improvement and used leather bags instead of grass sacks for drowning Hindus. Another Governor Atta Mohamma Khan was a terror to women both Hindu and Muslim. Jabbar Khan, who followed him, tried even to change the weather of the Valley. These events have been detailed in my book: “Unhappy Kashmir – The Hidden Story”. During this darkest period of Pathan rule, Hindus were killed or converted. This massive genocide reduced them further to a small minority. Leaving aside their Islamic zeal, Pathan rulers were cruel to Muslims also. Peasantry and labor were crushed economically. Kashmiri Muslim laborers were used as ponies and forced labor (begar) was introduced.
The persecution of Kashmiri Hindus from 1400 A.D. to 1819 A.D. has been well documented by a Muslim historian, Ghulam Hassan Khohami and Junaraja. During this period, thousands were made to embrace Islam by force, thousands were killed, and others fled away. Many perished en-route while fleeing. Many consumed poison to escape the persecution while others burnt themselves in flaming fire. These are all historical facts which paved the way for conversion of Kashmir from a Hindu area to a Muslim majority area. It is an irony of fate that while the Kashmiri Hindus accommodated, mingled with and absorbed the culture and traditions of all outsiders, who came to Kashmir, they were repeatedly rewarded with the most inhuman and brutal treatment. The most valuable treasure of Kashmiri Hindus were their scriptures. These were brutally burnt. Heavy taxes were imposed on Hindus when allowed to live. Bestialities like chopping of the noses and tongues, beheading, drowning in water after tying people back to back etc. were inflicted on the Hindus. Those who escaped forcible conversion, mutilation and death were forced into exile. The Muslim rule, with the exception of the period under Budshah, is the story of terror and horror. However, since the native Muslims were overwhelmingly converts and belonged to the same ethnic group as the Hindus, there had been a local ethos in Islam as practiced by the common Muslims, leaving the ruling lords aside. The period of Lal Ded and Nand Rishi was no doubt, a period of spiritual renaissance for all Kashmiris put together. The converted Muslims had retained the essential ingredients of Hinduism. In fact, Islam in Kashmir acquired its own distinct color and hue. The Sufi and Rishi order influenced Islam in Kashmir. The local devout Muslims believed in basic tenets of Islam, such as oneness of god, the Day of Judgment, the system of punishment and reward. But greater emphasis was laid on inner purification. They believed that the true meaning of Jihad was to wage a war against the evils inside man and true victory can be attained by curbing desires. The Rishis had a tremendous impact on the social and cultural life of Muslims and Hindus together. A seventeenth century poet wrote: “The candle or religion is lit by the Rishis. This Vale of Kashmir that you call a paradise, owes a lot of its charm to the traditions set by them”. The virtues of Kashmiri Islam as it developed by and by – contemplation, asceticism, renunciation, abstinence, simplicity, co-existence, etc. were common to the virtues admired in Hinduism. But unfortunately the new interpretation of Islam got pushed into the Valley through Aligarh channels informally and under the auspices of Jammat- i-Islami-Hind through former channels. Healthy traditions in Kashmir’s culture were damaged and destroyed among the Muslim’s and unhealthy ones propped up and fertilized.
Seeds of narcissism were planted by politicians with lust for power making Article 370 a tool for their power game. In the process Islam lost its Kashmiri ethos and even Sufism lost all its validity. On the occasion of Meraj- ul-alam, on 21st February, 1990, more than a lakh Muslims from Srinagar, using all modes of transport, reached Chrar-i-Sharief at the shrine of Sheikh-ul-Alam, Sheikh Nurruddin, the name by which Nand Rishi is known among Muslims, and vowed to take Kashmir out of India and clear it of all non-believers. Since then there has been no mercy on the Hindus of Kashmir. This event was a water-shed in the present insurgency. In the district town of Anantnag, killing of animals is forbidden during Navratri days in September-October, in reverence to the sacred memory of renowned Muslim saint Rishi Malloo Saheb, whose shrine in the heart of the town is a place of pilgrimage for Muslims as also Hindus. Muslims abstain from meat-eating during these days. But on account of intensive preachings of Imams from U.P., Delhi and other Indian cities, the Islamic ethos took an about-turn in Kashmir Valley. In the same town of Anantnag, in 1986, on the auspicious day of Janmashtami, Qazi Nissar, an Islamic scholar and Mirwaize of South Kashmir, came to the main thoroughfare of the town called Lal Chowk, with a sheep and killed it by his own hand under the resounding clappings of thousands of Muslims, who had been specially asked to assemble there on the occasion. Qazi Nissar had announced in advance to do so as an act of deliberate aggressive provocation to the Hindus as a signal that Islam would be followed this way only in Kashmir. The frightened Hindus of the town had sheltered themselves in their homes and Hindus in the rest of the country were fast asleep under secular sedatives.
“Oh! Aaftaab tooney dekha hai sab zamaana,
Kashmir kay chaman mein Panditon ka Ashiana.
Hum shaandar apna itihas pesh kartey,
Hota na pustakoon per garzulum washiana.”

ओह् आफ़ताब तूने देखा है सब झमाना

काशमीर के चमन में पंडितों का आशिआना।

हम शानदार अपना ईतिहास पेश करते

होता ना पुस्तकों पे गर्झुलुम् वशिआना॥

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

 

INDENTURED LABOR – ANOTHER FORM OF THE SLAVE TRADE

Dr. Satish Prakash satishprakash@yahoo.com
May 23 (2 days ago)

to family, persaudpun, Vivekanand, aryasamajonline, aryayouthgroup, mohabir, SatiGurdial

 

Watch this BBC documentary and understand how Britain instituted another form of slave trade in bringing our foreparents to its colonies.  Sad, very sad!
Satish Prakash, PhD, Vyakaranacharya
Founder-Acharya, Maharshi Dayananda Gurukula
Missionary of the Arya Samaj

Save the Cow, Save Earth

Save the Cow, Save Earth

By Subramanian Swamy

 

Our West-influenced intellectuals sneer at the mention of the cow. The same intellectuals first sneered at yoga. Now it is a fashion to do pranayama at cocktail parties The arguments in the West for cow slaughter are no more uncontested. They also sneered at our sanyasis as `godmen’. Now they flock to ashrams with their white friends ever since the Beatles. Who knows, they may soon have a cow in their backyards.
India has 150 million cows, each of them giving an average of less than 200 litres of milk per year. If they could be fed and looked after, they can give 11,000 litres, as Israeli cows do. That would provide milk for the whole world. The milk we produce today is the cheapest in the world. With enhanced production we could become the world’s largest exporter of milk and it could be India’s biggest foreign exchange earner.

For those of us who are desi by pedigree and conviction, I place some facts about the cow in the perspective of modern Hindutva.

The cow was elevated to divinity in the Rig Veda. In Book VI, Hymn XXVIII attributed to Rishi Bhardwaja extols the virtue of the cow. In Atharva Veda (Book X, Hymn X), the cow is formally designated as Vishnu, and `all that the Sun surveys’.

Indian society has addressed the cow as gow mata. The Churning of the Sea episode brings to light the story of the creation of the cow. Five divine Kamadhenus (wish cows), viz, Nanda, Subhadra, Surabhi, Sushila, Bahula emerged in the churning.

Thousands of names in our country are cow-related: Gauhati, Gorakhpur, Goa, Godhra, Gondiya, Godavari, Goverdhan, Gautam, Gomukh, Gokarna, Goyal, Gochar etc.

They signify reverence for the cow, and our abiding faith that the cow is Annapurna.

In 2003, the National Commission on Cattle under Justice G. M. Lodha submitted its recommendations to the NDA government. The report called for stringent laws to protect the cow and its progeny in the interest of the rural economy, a constitutional requirement under Directive Principles of State Policy. Article 48 of the Constitution says: `The State shall endeavour to organise agriculture and animal husbandry on modern and scientific lines and shall, in particular, take steps for preserving and improving the breeds, and prohibiting the slaughter of cows and calves and other milch and draught cattle’. During the First War of Independence in 1857, when Bahadur Shah `Zafar’ was installed as emperor by the Hindus in Delhi for a brief period, his Hindu prime minister, on the emperor’s proclamation, made cow killing a capital offence. In Maharaja Ranjit Singh’s kingdom, the only crime that invited capital punishment was cow slaughter.

The cow, according to the Vedas, provides four products for human use: (i) Godugdha (cow milk): As per Ayurveda, cow milk has fat, carbohydrates, minerals and Vitamin B, and even a capacity for body resistance to radiation and for regenerating brain cells. (ii) Goghruta (ghee): The best ghee, it is, as per Ayurveda useful in many disorders. In yajna, it improves the air’s oxygen level. (iii) Gomutra (urine): Eight types of urine are used for medicinal purpose nowadays, among which cow urine is held to be the best. The Americans are busy patenting it. It has anti-cancer, anti-bacterial, anti-fungal and antioxidant properties.

It has immune-modulator properties, which makes it useful for immune deficiency diseases. In the classics there are many references to cow urine as a drug of choice. Even the Parsis follow this practice.

Lastly, (iv), Gomaya (dung) is considered as valuable as Gomutra and used to purify the environment, as it has radium and checks radiation effects.

Ancient Hindu wisdom on the medicinal properties of cow urine is borne out by two patents granted in the US for cow urine distillate (Patent numbers 6410059 and 6896907).

Even China has granted the distillate a patent as a DNA protector. A global patent has been granted for cow urine, neem and garlic as a pest repellent and for fungicidal and growth promoting properties for different crops (WHO 2004/ 087618A1). A US patent has been granted for strains from Sahiwal cow milk for plant growth promoter phytopathogenic fungi controlling activity, abiotic stress tolerating capability, phosphatic solubilisation capability, etc. And CSIR has filed for a US patent for amrit pani, a mixture of cow dung, cow urine and jiggery, for soil health improvement properties.

These claims were initially made in the Charaka Samhita, Sushrut, Vaghbhati and Nighantu, Ratnakar, etc. They prove the utility of cow dung and urine for sustainable agriculture as well as for disease prevention.

The arguments in the West for cow slaughter are no more uncontested. There are better sources of protein than beef. Any dietician’s chart shows that beef with 22 per cent protein ranks below soya-bean (43), groundnut (31) and pulses (24 per cent). One kilogram of beef takes seven kg of crops and 7,000 kg of water to produce.

Thus cow protection makes economic and ecological sense. Swami Dayananda Saraswati, convenor of the Hindu Dharma Acharya Sabha, has argued that non-vegetarianism indirectly contributes heavily to greenhouse gases and other pollution.

He quotes a UN report from 2006 that says, “Raising animals for meat as food generates more greenhouse gases than all the cars and trucks in the world combined”. Ten of billions of animals farmed for food release gases such as methane, nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide through their massive amounts of manure. “The released methane”, the report says, “has 23 times the global warming potential of CO2”. For these animals to graze, virgin forests are cleared. The livestock industry also needs vast stretches of land to raise mono-crops to feed the animals. The CO2 that the trees and plants store escapes into the air when they are destroyed.

Growing fodder implies heavy use of synthetic fertilizers produced with fossil fuels.

While this process emits a huge amount of CO2, the fertilizer itself releases nitrous oxide (3) — a greenhouse gas that is 296 times more potent than CO2. Alarming though these facts are, all that people have to do is to avoid red meat. There will be no need to breed millions of animals for daily slaughter. The animal population will consequently decline.

A single individual by not consuming meat prevents the equivalent of 1.5 tonnes of CO2 emissions in a year. This is more than the one tonne of CO2 prevented by switching from a large sedan to a small car.

So there are a number of reasons to be a vegetarian. People who eat meat think a pure vegetarian diet is optional. But now they have no choice if they are alive to what is happening to this life-bearing planet. There is no justification for eating meat, given the devastating consequences for the planet.

A new fervour for a cow renaissance is necessary. It is constitutional (for India) and we should defend it with all our might. 

Thanks & Regards,

Sudhir Srinivasan
B.Arch, MSc.CPM, Dip.ID, Dip.CAD, Dip.PM
|Architect|