Verses from the Koran that the non-Muslims should know

From: Pramod Agrawas < >

Verses from the Koran warn about Islam

Submitted by Bruce HopkinsMar 5, 2017 16:44
The following is from my research into the Koran:
Koran 2:191 “slay the unbelievers wherever you find them”
Koran 3:21 “Muslims must not take the infidels as friends”
Koran 5:33 “Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam”
Koran 8:12 “Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Koran”
Koran 8:39 “So fight them until there is no more fitna [strife] and all submit to the religion of Allah.”
Koran 8:60 ” Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels”
Koran 8:65 “The unbelievers are stupid, urge all Muslims to fight them”
Koran 9:5 “When the opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you find them”
Koran 9:123 “Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood”
Koran 22:19 “Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water,
melt their skin and bellies”
Koran 47:4 “Do not hanker for peace with the infidels, behead them when you catch them”

A SHORT HISTORY OF INDIA—ITS HEROES AND INVADERS

Pramod Agrawal < > wrote:

A SHORT HISTORY OF INDIA—ITS HEROES AND INVADERS

This relates the invasions, challenges, massacres, and struggles of India’s people and heroes against the criminals who tried to destroy India and its culture. This is presented to preserve the real history of India.

Contents

 

ALEXANDER AND THE GREEKS

THE ARAB INVASIONS

THE TURKISH INVASION

THE MAMLUK (SLAVE) DYNASTY

THE KHILJIS

THE TUGHLAQS

THE SAYYID & LODHI DYNASTIES

THE BAHAMANIS

THE MUGHALS

THE PORTUGUESE

THE BRITISH EAST INDIA COMPANY

THE INITIAL STRUGGLE FOR INDEPENDENCE

THE BRITISH RAJ

CHHATRAPATI SHIVAJI

HEROES AFTER SHIVAJI

 

ADDITIONAL HEROES WHO WORKED FOR PROTECTING INDIA AND ITS CULTURE

HALL OF SHAME (Muslim Rulers and Criminals Against India)

For more than two millennia, India has suffered one bloody invasion after another, leaving a Holocaust of millions of lives and a civilization and culture left in near ruins. Through it all, India is the only one of the great ancient civilizations that has survived today. Hinduism is the most ancient and only continuously surviving religion and culture that has successfully maintained itself while so many other cultures and civilizations have vanished. No other ancient civilization has retained its ancient religion and culture under the onslaught of the western Abrahamic monotheist religions.

The first of the major invasions came from Alexander of Macedonia. His invasion of India was intended to bring Greek culture to India and to encourage cultural exchange between the Indic and Hellenic worlds. This invasion was mild compared to the savage invasions of Islam, which continue even today, attempting to decimate the Indian religions of Dharma and the Culture of Bhaaratvarsha (India). The contemporary French writer François Gautier has said, “The massacres perpetuated by Muslims in India are unparalleled in history, bigger than the Holocaust of the Jews by the Nazis; or the massacre of the Armenians by the Turks; more extensive even than the slaughter of the South American native populations by the invading Spanish and Portuguese.”

Just as India was about to successfully throw off the yoke of Islamic barbarism after nearly 1000 years of slaughter, the British and Portuguese came with their missionaries. They tried to finish what Islam had begun, beginning centuries more of colonial strangulation of the great Vedic Culture of India, until finally India won her Independence in 1947. By then, so much damage had been done that India was forced to accept partition along religious lines and give up much of her northern territories to what are today the Islamic States of Pakistan and Bangladesh.

What is left of modern India is still rife with a growing population of Muslims and the continuing threat of Christian missionaries, openly seeking to wipe out Hinduism, which is not only the majority religion of India, but more than that, the Indian way of life and her very culture. Here we present a brief overview of the history of the foreign invasions and occupations of India.

ALEXANDER AND THE GREEKS

336 B.C.E. – 323 B.C.E.

Alexander was the King of Macedonia, a nation north of the city-states of ancient Greece, which was heavily influenced by the Hellenic (Greek) culture. Alexander was just 21 years old in the year 336 B.C.E., when he decided to invade India, after having conquered much of Asia Minor and the Middle East. At the time, King Taxiles ruled a large area in India. When he heard that Alexander was coming, Taxiles did not wait, but went in person to meet him in peace. “Why should we make war on each other,” Taxiles said, “if the reason for your coming is not to rob us of our water and our food? Those are the only things that a wise man has no choice but to fight for. As for any other riches or possessions, if I have more than you I am ready to share. But if fortune has been better to you than to me, then I have no objection to being in your debt.”

 

These courteous words pleased Alexander, and he replied: “Do you think your kind words and courteous conduct will avoid a contest between us? No, I will not let you off so easily. I will do battle with you on these terms: no matter how much you give me, I will give more in return.”

 

 

 

Thereupon Taxiles made many fine presents to Alexander, but Alexander responded with presents of even greater value and topped them off with a thousand talents in gold coins. This generosity displeased Alexander’s old friends but won the hearts of many of the Indians.

 

 

 

King Porus, however, refused to submit, and he took up a position to prevent Alexander from crossing the Hydaspes River. Porus was a huge man, and when mounted on his war elephant he looked in the same proportion as an ordinary man on a horse. After a long fight, Alexander won the victory, and Porus came to him as a prisoner. Alexander asked him how he expected to be treated, and Porus replied: “As a king.” When Alexander asked a second time, Porus explained that in those words was included everything that a man could possibly want.   Alexander not only allowed Porus to keep his kingdom as a satrap, but he also gave him more territory.

 

This was a costly victory, however. Many Macedonians died, and so did Alexander’s old war horse, Bucephalus. This grieved Alexander so much that it seemed as though he had lost an old friend. On that spot he ordered a city to be built, named Bucephalia after his beloved horse, Bucephalus.

 

 

 

Such a difficult victory over only 22,000 Indians [May 326 B.C.] took the edge off the courage of the Macedonians. They had no enthusiasm for Alexander’s proposed crossing of the Ganges, a river said to be four miles wide and six hundred feet deep, to encounter an army on the other side consisting of 200,000 infantry, 80,000 cavalry, 8,000 chariots, and 6,000 war elephants.

 

 

 

Alexander was so angry at their reluctance that he shut himself up in his tent, saying that if they would not cross the Ganges, he owed them no thanks for anything they had done so far. But finally the persuasions of his friends, and the pleas of his soldiers, got Alexander to agree to turn back.

 

 

 

To exaggerate his reputation, Alexander left bridles and armor that were much bigger than normal, and huge altars to the gods. On a flotilla of rafts and barges, Alexander’s army floated down the Indus River.

 

Along the way, they stopped to take some fortified cities, and at one of them Alexander came very close to losing his life. Alexander was the first one up the ladders onto the wall of the city of the Mallians, and then he jumped down into the town with only two of his guards behind him.

 

 

 

Before the rest of the Macedonians could catch up and save him, Alexander had taken an arrow in the ribs and had been knocked dizzy by a club. He was unconscious when they carried him away, and he fainted when the doctors cut out the arrow. Rumors spread that Alexander was dead.

 

 

 

While in India, Alexander took ten of the Brahmins prisoner. These men had a great reputation for intelligence, so Alexander decided to give them a test. He announced that the one who gave the worst answer would be the first to die, and he made the oldest Brahmin the judge of the competition.

 

 

 

Which are more numerous, Alexander asked the first one, the living or the dead? “The living,” said the Brahmin, “because the dead no longer count.”

 

Which produces more creatures, the sea or the land? Alexander asked the second. “The land,” was his answer, “because the sea is only a part of it.”

 

The third was asked which animal was the smartest of all, and the Brahmin replied: “The one we have not found yet.”

 

 

 

Alexander asked the fourth what argument he had used to stir up the Indians to fight, and he answered: “Only that one should either live nobly or die nobly.”

 

Which is older: day or night? was Alexander’s question to the fifth, and the answer he got was: “Day is older, by one day at least.” When he saw that Alexander was not satisfied with this answer, the Brahmin added: “Strange questions get strange answers.”

 

What should a man do to make himself loved? asked Alexander, and the sixth Brahmin replied: “Be powerful without being frightening.”

 

 

 

What does a man have to do to become a god? he asked the seventh, who responded: “Do what is impossible for a man.”

 

The question to the eighth was whether death or life was stronger, and his answer: “Life is stronger than death, because it bears so many miseries.”

 

The ninth Brahmin was asked how long it was proper for a man to live, and he said: “Until it seems better to die.”

 

 

 

Then Alexander turned to the judge, who decided that each one had answered worse than another. “You will die first, then, for giving such a decision,” said Alexander. “Not so, mighty king,” said the Brahmin, “if you want to remain a man of your word. You said that you would kill first the one who made the worst answer.” Alexander gave all of the Brahmins presents and set them free, even though they had persuaded the Indians to fight him.

 

 

 

Alexander’s voyage down the Indus took seven months.   When he finally arrived at the Indian Ocean, he decided not to take the army home by ship but to march them through the Gedrosian Desert.   After sixty miserable days, they arrived at Gedrosia, where they finally found enough to eat and drink. Many died in that desert: out of the 120,000 infantry and 15,000 cavalry that Alexander took with him into India, only one in four came back.

 

 

 

 

 

THE ARAB INVASIONS

 

636 C.E. – 850 C.E.

 

In one of the Hadiths (Muslim scripture) the Prophet Muhammad is quoted as saying “Two groups of my Ummah, Allah has protected from the hellfire: a group that will conquer India and a group that will be with Isa ibnu Maryam (Jesus, son of Mary).” The first attempted invasion of India by Muslims occurred in 636 CE — under Caliph Umar, within four years of Muhammad’s death. The first 16 invasion attempts utterly failed. But the 17th attempt to invade India by Muhammad bin Qâsim, which was carried out against the wishes of the Kalifate, was successful. Muhammad bin Qâsim marched to Sindh with 15,000 men. He arrived at Debal, a port city near the modern Karachi, in 711. There he was bolstered by the arrival of his artillery by sea, and took the town. This was followed by his conquest of Alor, located north of Hyderabad in June 712. In the fighting before Aror the Raja Dâhir was slain. The next year he also conquered the important city of Multan.

 

 

 

Following the rapid conquest of Sindh, Arab progress was checked. In part this was caused by internal division. In 714 Hajjâj died, and in 715 the Calif Walid I (705-715) took interest in the campaign and recalled the conquering general, Muhammad bi Qâsim. Arab control thereafter rapidly disintegrated, leading many local rulers to repudiate their allegiance to the Arabs. The Arabs also met stiff resistance from neighboring Indian kings. When an Arab governor of Sindh, Junaid, sought to seize Kacch and Malwa, he was foiled by the Pratihara and Gurjara kings. The Arabs were thus unable to expand beyond Sindh, but they were able to maintain their hold on the province. In 985 an Ismaili Fatamid dynasty declared its independence in Multan.

 

 

 

 

 

THE TURKISH INVASION

 

1000 C.E. – 1206 C.E.

 

The break-up of the Gurjara-Pratihara empire led to a phase of political uncertainty in north India. As a result, little attention was paid to the emergence of the aggressive and expansionist Turks from north-west.

 

 

 

Rajputana States

 

 

 

The three most important of the Rajput states in north India were the Gahrwals of Kanauj, the Paramaras of Malwa and the Chauhans of Ajmer.

 

 

 

There were other smaller dynasties in different parts of the country, such as the Kalachuris in the area around Jabalpur, the Chandellas in Bundelkhand, the Chalukyas of Gujarat, the Tomars of Delhi, etc. Bengal remained under the control of the Palas and later, the Senas.

 

 

 

There was a continuous struggle and warfare between the various Rajput states. It was these rivalries which made it impossible for the Rajput rulers to join hands to oust the Ghaznavids from the Punjab. In fact, the Ghaznavids felt strong enough to make raids even up to Ujjain.

 

 

 

Most of the Rajput rulers of the time were champions of Hinduism, though some of them also patronized Jainism. The Rajput rulers protected the privileges of the brahmanas and of the caste system. Between the tenth and the twelfth century, temple-building activity in north India reached it’s climax.

 

 

 

The most representative temples of this type are the group of temples at Khajuraho in Madhya Pradesh. Most of these temples were built by the Chandellas, who ruled in the area from the beginning of the ninth to the end of the thirteenth century. In Orissa, magnificent examples of temple architecture are the Lingaraja temple (11th century) and the Sun temple of Konark (13th century). The famous Jagannath temple at Puri also belongs to this period.

 

 

 

Mahmud of Ghazni

 

Mahmud of Ghazni raided the country in 1000 AD, with his first great victory against the Hindushahi kings of Peshawar. The muslim rulers of Multan were the second targets. In a short period of 25 years, he is said to have made 17 raids into India. From the Punjab, Mahmud raided Nagarkot in the Punjab hills and Thanesar near Delhi.

 

 

 

His most daring raids, however, were against Kanauj in 1018 and against the fabulously rich Somnath temple in Gujarat. No attempt was made to annex any of these areas. The rich spoils from the temples, which were repositories of wealth, helped him to consolidate his rule and embellish Ghazni with palaces and mosques. He died in Ghazni in 1030.

 

 

 

Muhammad of Ghur

 

The second Turkish attack was led by Mu’izzu’d-Din Muhammad (also known as Muhammad Ghuri), who conquered Sindh and Lahore in 1182. Soon after, he commenced his attack on the Rajput kingdoms. Prithviraj Chauhan successfully led the Rajputs against Ghuri at the first battle of Tarain in 1191 AD. However, at the second battle of Tarain in 1192 AD, Prithviraj was defeated and the kingdom of Delhi fell to Muhammad Ghuri. Before Ghuri’s assassination in 1206, Turkish control had been established along the whole length of the Ganga. Bihar and Bengal were also overrun.

 

Ghuri’s conquests started a new era in Indian history… The Delhi Sultanate

 

 

 

 

 

THE MAMLUK (SLAVE) DYNASTY

 

1206 C.E. – 1290 C.E

 

Ghuri’s conquest became the nucleus of a new political entity of India – the Delhi Sultanate. For almost one hundred years after that, the Delhi Sultanate was involved in foreign invasions, internal conflicts among the Turkish leaders and the dispossessed Rajput rulers and chiefs to regain their independence.

 

 

 

Ghuri left his Indian possessions in the care of his former slave, General Qutb-ud- din Aibak. He played an important part in the expansion of the Turkish sultanate in India after the battle of Tarrain.

 

 

 

On the death of his master, Aibak severed his links with Ghazni and asserted his

 

independence, and founded the Slave Dynasty (mamluks). This helped to prevent India being drawn into central asian politics and enabled the Delhi Sultanate to develop independently.

 

 

 

Iltutmish (1210 AD – 1236 AD), son-in-law of Aibak – succeeded Aibak as the sultan by defeating Aibak’s son. Thus, the principle of heredity, of son succeeding his father was checked at the outset. Iltutmish must be regarded as the real consolidator of the Turkish conquests in north India.

 

 

 

He gave the new state capital, Delhi, a monarchical form of government and governing class. He introduced Iqta – grant of revenue from a territory in lieu of salary. He maintained a central army and introduced coins of Tanka (silver) and Jital (copper). The famous Qutub Minar was completed during his reign. He despatched an expedition against the Chalukyas of Gujarat but it was repelled with losses.

 

 

 

Around this time, Mongols under the leadership of Ghinghiz Khan, swept across central Asia and mercilessly sacked the kingdoms. They periodically crossed river Indus to attack Punjab and Iltutmish had to keep constant check on this side.

 

 

 

During his last years, Iltutmish finally nominated his daughter Raziya (1236 AD – 1239 AD) to the throne. Raziya was the First and only Muslim lady to sit on Delhi Throne. In order to assert her claim, Raziya had to contend against her brothers as well as against powerful Turkish nobles, and could rule only for three years.

 

 

 

Though brief, her rule had a number of interesting features like the beginning of the struggle for power between the monarchy and the Turkish chiefs, sometimes called as the forty or Chahalgami. She sent an expedition against Ranthambhor to control the Rajputs, and successfully established law and order in the length and breadth of her kingdom. In 1239 AD, an internal rebellion broke out in which Raziya was imprisoned and killed by bandits.

 

 

 

The struggle between the monarchy and the Turkish chiefs continued till one of the Turkish chiefs Balban (Ulugh khan) (1265 AD – 1285 AD) ascended the throne. During the earlier period he held the position of naib or deputy to Nasiruddin Mahmud, a younger son of Iltultmish. He broke the Chahalgami and made the Sultan all important.

 

 

 

After Balban’s death, there was again confusion in Delhi for some times. In 1290, the Khilji’s, under the leadership of Jalaluddin Khilji, wrested power from the incompetent successor of Balban.

 

 

 

 

 

THE KHILJIS

 

1290 C.E. – 1320 C.E.

 

The Khiljis used their Afghan descent to win the loyalties of the discontented nobles, who felt that they had been neglected by earlier Slave sultans.

 

 

 

Jalaluddin Khilji (1290 AD – 1296 AD) tried to mitigate some of the harsh aspects of Balban’s rule. He was the first ruler to put forward the view that the state should be based on the willing support of the governed and that since the majority of Indians were Hindus, the state cannot be truly Islamic.

 

 

 

Alauddin Khilji (1296 AD – 1316 AD) treacherously murdered his uncle and father-in-law, Jalaluddin. By harsh methods, he cowed down the nobles and made them completely subservient to the crown. He was ambitious and dreamt of an all India empire.

 

 

 

Over a twenty five years period, Malwa, Gujarat and Rajasthan was brought under his control. To solve the water problems in summer, he constructed lot of Baolis (Wells). His famous general Malik Kafur led the campaign (1308 AD – 1312 AD) to the south and defeated the Yadavas of Deogiri, the Kakityas of Warangal and the Hoysalas of Dwarasamudra.

 

 

 

Alauddin also repelled the Mongols successfully. His military success was because of the creation of a large standing army directly recruited and paid by the state. He revoked all grants made by previous sultans, introduced price control covering almost the entire market and rationed the grain.

 

 

 

In order to effectively subordinate nobles, he banned drinking of intoxicants. The sultan’s permission was necessary before marriage could be arranged among the member of nobility, so that marriage alliances of a political nature could be prevented. No further rebellion took place during his life time, but in the long run his methods proved harmful to the dynasty. As the old nobility was destroyed, the new nobility was taught to accept any one who could ascend the throne of Delhi.

 

Kings followed in quick succession after his death, till in 1320, a group of officers led by Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq raised the banner of revolt and put an end to the Khilji dynasty.

 

 

THE TUGHLAQS

 

1320 C.E. – 1412 C. E.

 

The Tughlaqs also wished to rule the whole of India. Ghyasuddin’s (1320 AD – 1325 AD) campaign to Warrangal, Orissa and Bengal were directed towards this end. He built the city Tughlaqabad near Delhi.

 

By 1324 AD, the territories of the Delhi sultanate reached upto Madurai. However, his economic policy was not consistent with his political ambitions. As the Iqta holders were permitted their earlier perquisites, power gradually slipped back into the hands of nobles.

 

Muhammad-Bin-Tughlaq (1325 AD – 1351 AD) succeeded his father and was referred to as an ill-starred idealist, whose experiments generally ended in failure. He extended the kingdom beyond India, into Central Asia.

 

To meet the expenses of the large army Muhammad increased the tax but the peasants refused and rebelled. Though the rebellion was suppressed, the taxation policy had to be revised. He decided to issue token coins in brass and copper which had the same value as silver coins. But due to the absence of a central mint, people began to forge the new coins, and the token coins had to be discontinued.

 

Muhammad Bin-Tughlaq decided to move his capital from Delhi to Deogir (Daulatabad), in order to control the Deccan and extend the empire into the south. The plan ended in failure because of discontent amongst those who had been forced to move to Deogir and Muhammad also found that he could not keep a watch on the northern frontier.

 

In 1334 bubonic plague wiped out more than half his army, and the army ceased to be effective. Due to this, in 1334 the Pandyan kingdom (Madurai) rejected the authority of the sultanate and this was followed by Warangal. In 1336 the Vijayanagara empire and in 1337 the Bahamani kingdom were founded. They built magnificent capitals and cities with many splendid buildings, promoted arts and also provided law and order and the development of commerce and handicrafts. Thus while the forces of disintegration gradually triumphed in north India, south India and the Deccan had a long spell of stable government.

 

Firoz Shah Tughlaq (1351 AD – 1388 AD) succeeded Muhammad. Having become sultan with the support of the nobles and the theologians, he had to appease them. His death was followed by civil war among his descendants.

 

The sultanate became weak and in 1398, the Mongols, under the leadership of Timur (Tamerlane), mercilessly sacked and plundered Delhi. Timur returned to central Asia leaving his nominee to rule in the Punjab.

 

 

THE SAYYID & LODHI DYNASTIES

 

1414 C.E. 1526 C.E.

 

The Tughlaq dynasty ended soon after the Timurs invasion but the sultanate survived, though it was merely a shadow of its former self. Timurs nominee captured Delhi and was proclaimed the new sultan and the first of Sayyid Dynasty (1414 AD – 1451 AD), which was to rule the earlier half of the fifteenth century.

 

Their rule was short-lived and confined to a radius of some 200 miles around Delhi. They kept the machinery going until a more capable dynasty, the Lodhis, took over. The Lodhis were of pure Afghan origin, and brought an eclipses to the Turkish nobility. Bahlul Lodhi established himself in Punjab after the Timur’s invasion. The most important Lodhi Sultan was Sikandar Lodhi (1489 – 1517), who controlled the Ganga Valley as far as Bengal. He moved his capital from Delhi, to be able to control the kingdom better, to a new town which later become famous as the city of Agra.

 

The last, Lodhi Ibrahim, asserted his absolute power and did not consider the tribal feelings. This lead to his making enemies with them. Finally they plotted with Babar and succeeded in overthrowing him in 1526 at the first battle of Panipat.

 

As the power of the Sultanate declined, a number of other kingdoms arose.

 

In Western India – Malwa and Gujarat,

 

In Eastern India – Jaunpur and Bengal,

 

In Northern India – Kashmir, and

 

In the Deccan and the south – The Vijayanagara and the Bahamani.

 

As the Islamic population in India swelled, the identity of the Indian Moslem acquired a new definition. Islam now actively influenced most facets of life. The Hindu elite adopted the purdha system and their language began to be written in Arabic script, leading to a new language, Urdu. Calligraphy came into its own and was raised to the highest form of aesthetic expression.

 

Around this time on the north-western part of India, especially around Punjab a new religion Sikhism started to gain popularity

 

 

THE BAHAMANIS

 

1346C.E. – 1689 C.E.

 

The Bahamani kingdom was founded by Hasan Gangu, who led a rebellion against Sultan Muhammad- Bin-Tughlaq and proclaimed the independence of the Bahamani kingdom (1346 AD).

 

He took the title of Bahaman Shah and became the first ruler of the dynasty. This kingdom included the whole of the northern Deccan upto the river Krishna. South of the kingdom was the Vijayanagara Empire with which it had to fight continueous wars for various reasons.

 

The most remarkable figure in the Bahamani kingdom was Firuz Shah Bahamani (1397 AD – 1422 AD), who fought three major battles with the Vijayanagara Empire without any major result. He was well acquainted with religious and natural sciences. He wanted to make the Deccan the cultural centre of India.

 

Ferhishta – the court poet, calls him an orthodox Muslim, his only weakness being his fondness for drinking wine and listening to music. Firuz Shah was compelled to abdicate in favour of his brother Ahmad Shah I, who was called a saint (wali) on account of his association with the famous Sufi Gesu Daraz. He invaded Warangal and annexed most of its territories.

 

The loss of Warangal changed the balance of power in south India. The Bahamani kingdom gradually extended and reached its climax under the prime ministership of Mahmud Gawan (1466 AD – 1481 AD). One of the most difficult problems which faced the Bahamanis was a strife among the nobles, who were divided into Deccanis (old-comers) and Afaqis or gharibs (new-comers).

 

Since, Gawan was a new-comer, it was hard for him to win the confidence of the Deccanis. His broad policy of conciliation, could not stop the party strife. In 1482, Gawan who was over seventy years, was executed by Sultan Muhammad Shah of the Deccan.

 

After his death, the party strife became more intense and various governors became independent and were finally divided into five parts, namely, Adil Shahi of Bijapur, Qutub Shahi of Golconda, Nizam Shahi of Ahmadnagar, Barid Shahi of Bidar and Imad Shahi of Berar.

 

This kingdom together crusaded against Vijayanagara Empire and defeated it in 1565. Later on, Imad Shahi was conquered by Nizamshah (1574 AD) and Barid Shahi was annexed by Adilshah (1619 AD). These three kingdoms played a leading role in the Deccan politics till their absorption in the Mughal empire during the seventeenth century. It was Aurangzeb, the Mughal king, who after the death of Shivaji, marched towards the south and annexed Bijapur (1686 AD) and Golconda (1689 AD) and brought an end to the Bahamani kingdom.

 

One of the largest domes of the world, Gol Gumbaz at Bijapur and Charminar at Hyderabad were the fine examples of architecture of this time. The Bahamanis, in many respects were similar to the Delhi sultanate. Their income came almost entirely from land and the administration revolved around the assessment and collection of land revenue.

 

The Bahamani kingdom acted as a cultural bridge between the north and the south. The culture which developed as a result had its own specific features which were distinct from north India.

 

These cultural traditions were continued by the successors states and also influenced the development of Mughal culture during the period.

 

 

THE MUGHALS

 

1526 C.E. – 1857 C.E.

 

The Mughal period can be called a second classical age in northern India. In this cultural development, the Indian traditions were amalgamated with the Turko-Iranian culture, brought to the country by the Mughals.

 

The Mughal rulers of India kept up the closest of contacts with Iran and there was a stream of scholars and artists coming over the frontiers to seek fame and fortune at the brilliant court of the Great Mughal, Babar.

 

Babar (1526 AD – 1530 AD)

 

Babar founder of the Mughal dynasty, was the king of Kabul. He was invited to India to fight against Ibrahim Lodhi. He confronted and defeated Lodhi in 1526 at the first battle of Panipat.

 

Babar was the first king to bring artillery to India and succeeded because the cavalry that he had brought from central Asia, which was new to the Indian army, and the fact that he was a good general, with an easily moved army.

 

Before his death, he had made himself the master of the Punjab, Delhi and the Ganga plains as far as Bihar. He wrote Tuzuk-i-Babari an autobiography, containing a lively description of India, in Turkish.

 

Humayun (1530 AD – 1556 AD)

 

He inherited a vast unconsolidated empire and an empty treasury. He also had to deal with the growing power of the Afghan Sher Shah, from the east, who had Bihar and Bengal under him. Sher Shah defeated Humayun in Kannauj (1540 AD) and Humayun passed the next twelve years in exile. In 1555, after Sher Shah’s death, Humayun regained the throne from his weak successor.

 

Akbar, his son, succeed him in 1556 AD, and consolidated the empire. He was such a good builder that the edifice he had erected lasted for another hundred years in spite of inadequate successors.

 

There was great subversion of Indian culture, in an effort to Islamicize it. Indian music was adopted as a whole and with enthusiasm by the Muslim Courts and the nobility. Literature and poetry were also encouraged and among the noted poets in Hindi some were Muslims. Ibrahim Adil Shah, the ruler of Bijapur, wrote a treatise in Hindi on Indian music.

 

Akbar (1556 AD – 1605 AD)

 

He consolidated the occupying Mughal empire. Daring and reckless, an able general, and ruthless. An idealist and a dreamer, and yet a man of action and a leader of men who roused the passionate loyalty of his followers.

 

He was only thirteen, when he came to the throne. His first conflict was with Hemu, a general of Adil Shah, under whom the Afghan resistance had regrouped. King Hemu was the only one Hindu King who ever ruled the Delhi Throne in Indian History. At the second battle of Panipat (1556 AD), Hemu was defeated and Akbar reoccupied Delhi and Agra. Akbar annexed Malwa and brought a major part of Rajasthan under his control. He built the Buland Darwaza, after his successful campaign in dominating Gujarat. Most of the Rajputs were forced to recognise his suzerainty, except Mewar, which continued to resist under the great hero Rana Pratap and his son Amar Singh.

 

After his success in military activities and administration, Akbar’s insatiable quest and his personal need led him to build the Ibadat-Khana – Hall of prayer (1575 AD). Initially it was open only to the Sunnis but later in 1578, it was opened to people of all religions in an effort to win over those who refused to convert. However, in 1582, he discontinued the debates in the Ibadat-Khana.

 

Later the academic, spiritual and metaphysical aspects of it crystallized into Tauhid-i-Ilahi (Divine Monotheism). Akbar did not create a new religion but suggested a new religious path based on the common truths of all religions, which continued to place Islam in a supreme position. The word Din (Faith) of Din-i-Ilahi, was applied after eighty years.

 

Akbar claimed to believe that a ruler was the guardian of his subjects and had to look after their welfare irrespective of their sect or creed. He claimed a policy of Sulh-i-kul (peace to all).

 

Because of his attempt to convince the native population that he was a generous and tolerant tyrant, he has come to be called by the gullible as one of the great rulers in Indian history, a lie still believed by many today.

 

Salim (1605 AD – 1627 AD)

 

Akbar’s son, Salim succeeded him as Jahangir after his death. He strengthened his control over Bengal and his four successive campaigns forced Amar Singh of Mewar to accept his suzerainty. The Mughal empire became more vulnerable to attacks from central and western Asia. Towards the end of his reign, he had to deal with the rebellion of his son Shah Jahan. Toward the end of his reign, the East India Company (1600 AD) was established in India. An important event of his reign was the active interest taken by Nur Jahan, his queen, in matters of the State and she also ruled the empire when he was ill.

 

Shah Jahan (1628 AD – 1658 AD)

 

On his succession to the throne, the first thing he had to face was revolts in Bhundelkhand and the Deccan. The former he put down easily and the latter came into control with difficulty. Meanwhile the Marathas also emerged as a major threat to the authority of the Mughals.

 

The Famous peacock throne and the Red Fort were completed by him. He seized and remodeled a great Shiva Temple, the Tejo Mahila, and turned it into a graveyard for one of his dead wives and renamed it Taj Mahal. His failing health started a war of succession amongst his four sons in 1657.

 

Aurangzeb (1658 AD – 1707 AD)

 

Aurangzeb, the third son treacherously emerged victorious by killing his brothers and imprisoned his father in Agra fort till his death. He ruled for almost 50 years. During his long reign the Mughal empire reached its territorial climax. At its height, it stretched from Kashmir in the north to Jinji in the south, and from the Hindu Kush in the west to Chittagong in the east.

 

He was an orthodox in his outlook and kept himself within the narrow confines of the Islamic law. He discarded Akbar’s supposedly secular principles and vigorously enforced the Jaziya Tax on all non-muslims with severity and destroyed many temples. This did not make Muslims more loyal to the Islamic state, although, the vast native Hindu majority became even more alienated.

 

Most of his time was spent in trying to put down the revolts in different parts of his empire. While the empire was rent by strife and revolt, the new Maratha power was growing and consolidating itself in western India. Shivaji, the Maratha King, stopped Aurangzeb’s mission of expanding towards the south. However after Shivaji’s death Aurangzeb accomplished his mission of southward expansion. Apart from him, no one else, except the Britishers held India under a single rule.

 

Aurangzeb, the last of Mughals, tried to put the clock back, and in his attempt broke up the empire. After his death, the Mughal empire collapsed with internal conflicts among the successors and was reduced to the area around Delhi.

 

The various provinces declared their independence and the Marathas under the leadership of Peshwas, gradually extended their hold in North India. Foreign invasion of Nadir Shah Abdali in 1729 AD and Ahmed Shah Abdali in 1747-61 AD further weakened the empire. The last Mughal emperor Bahadur Shah Zafar was imprisoned by the Britishers after the 1857 mutiny.

 

THE PORTUGUESE

 

India’s connection with the west has predominantly been related to trade. Amongst the modern Europeans, the Portuguese were the first to establish themselves in India and the last of the Europeans to leave. They arrived as early as 1498 via the ocean route discovered by Vasco-da-Gama.

 

He was the first discoverer of sea route via Cape of Good Hope to India, when Constantinople came under Arab power. Portuguese left behind Roman Catholic Christianity with its Baroque churches, its musical liturgy and its great monastic order committed to education. What happened to India when the Portuguese arrived?

 

European interest in India has persisted since classical times and for very cogent reasons. Europe had much to steal from India such as spices, textiles and other oriental products. The best classical accounts are in fact the commercial ones. When direct contact was lost with the fall of Rome and the rise of the Muslims, the trade was carried on through middlemen. In the late Middle Ages it increased with the increasing prosperity of Europe. It should be remembered that the spice trade was not solely a luxury trade at that time. Spices were needed to preserve meat through the winter (cattle had to be slaughtered in late autumn through lack of winter fodder) and to combat the taste of decay. Wine, in the absence of ancient or modern methods of maturing, had to be ‘mulled’ with spices. This trade suffered two threats in the later Middle Ages. There was

 

the threat of Mongol and Turkish invasion which interfered with the land routes and threatened to engulf the sea route through Egypt, and there was the threat of monopoly shared between the Venetians and Egyptians.

 

In 1510 Affonso de Albuquerque captured the island of Goa on the west coast of India from the Sultan of Bijapur and made it the capital of the Portuguese eastern empire. Its strong points besides Goa were Socotra off the Red Sea (he could not take Aden), Ormuz in the Persian Gulf, Diu in Gujrat, Malacca, the entrepot for the Far East and the spice trade in the East Indies, and Macao in China. The function of Goa was to supervise Malabar, to control the pilgrim traffic to Mecca as well as the general trade to Egypt, Iraq and Persia, and of Malacca to control the East Indian spices at their source.

 

However, the Portuguese irked some of the Mughal and preceding rulers because of the toll they took of the trade from the port of Surat and the pilgrim traffic. In seizing and retaining their strong points they acquired a reputation for cruelty and peridy because their practice on both these points was below the current Indian standard. They were deeply impregnated with the idea that no faith need be kept with an infidel. It was from this period that the word feringi (lit.farangi, frank) acquired the opprobrium of which echoes may still be heard today.

 

However, the Mughal Emperor, Jahangir admired their pictures and had them copied. Emperor Akbar listened with interest to Jesuit Father’s discourses. The New Testament was translated into Persian. However, during the whole of the 16th century the Portuguese disputed with the Muslims the supremacy of the Indian seas, and the antagonism between Christianity and Islam became gradually more intense. In 1519, Ferdinand Magellan, a Portuguese navigator commanded the first expedition to sail around the world. In the Collins Encyclopaedia it is written that Magellan set sail to check the power of Muslim navy and fleet that was dominant. In 1560, the Portuguese

 

being intolerant in religion, introduced the Inquisition with all its horrors. This was regarded as sub-standard from the Indian standpoint, advertising this trait in their rough handling of Syrian Christians of Malabar to secure their submission to the Catholic faith.

 

Socially the policy of Albuquerque in encouraging mixed marriages had important results. His object was to rear a population possessing Portuguese blood and imbued with Portuguese Catholic culture who would be committed by race and taste to the Portuguese settlements and so form a permanent self-perpetuating garrison. The result was the race long known as Luso-Indians and now as Goansese or Goans. They are mainly Indian in blood, Catholic in religion, and partially western in outlook. In recent times, they have spread all over India as traders and professionals, a less successful version of the Parsis. (Of all the Asians in Britain, a majority of whom are Muslim, the first Asian MP had to be a Roman Catholic of Goanese descent, Keith Vaz).

 

Some Portuguese words have even crept into the Urdu language such as the names of items for furniture (mayze for desk, almaari for cupboard/wardrobe). Also vindaloo (curry) is part Portuguese and part Urdu: vian is Portuguese for meat and aloo is the Urdu for potato – thus we have meat and potato curry.

 

The Portuguese were soon followed by European rivals like the French, Dutch and British. Rivalry between the Dutch and English resulted in the Dutch East India Company “winning” Southeast Asia and Indonesia (known to Europeans as the East Indies); and the British East India Company having to settle for “second-best”, that is India.

 

THE BRITISH EAST INDIA COMPANY

 

The East India Company chartered by the British crown and ultimately responsible to the parliament, launched British rule in India. The British East India Company was established under a Royal Charter of Queen Elizabeth I for 15 years for spice trading on 31st December 1600 AD with the capital of £70,000.

 

By the middle of the eighteenth century, the company succeeded in establishing power in Bengal, Bihar, Orissa and the east coast. After the battle of Plassey, in 1757, they secured permission from the Mughals to collect land revenue from these provinces in return for an annual tribute and maintaining of order and peace.

 

They collected the land revenues through the local Nawab and took control of his army. This gave them power without responsibility. The Company took control of Mysore by defeating Tipu Sultan in 1792 and the Marathas were finally defeated in 1817 AD – 1819 AD. Further the company expanded its rule by defeating Nepal in 1814-16, Sind in 1843, Punjab in 1848-49 and Burma in 1886.

 

The cruel management of the company ultimately lead to the mutiny of 1857, after which its rule over India ended and the British Crown officially took over the administration in 1858.

 

क्या …देवबंद (Deoband) मदरसा आतंकवाद का अड्डा है… (Hindi)

From: Vinod Kumar Gupta < >

” क्या …देवबंद (Deoband) मदरसा आतंकवाद का अड्डा है…”

महोदय/ महोदया

 

🔼यह शीर्षक पढ़ कर कट्टरपंथी मुल्ला आक्रोशित अवश्य होंगे पर “देवबंद मदरसा है आतंकवाद का अड्डा” शीर्षक से सच्चाई लिखने वाले कोई और नहीं प्रसिद्ध इस्लामिक विद्वान व लेखक श्री मुजफ्फर हुसैन है। इनके उपरोक्त शीर्षक से लिखे तथ्यपरक लेख को दिल्ली से प्रकाशित होने वाले हिंदी साप्ताहिक ‘पाञ्चजन्य’ ने 15 फरवरी 2009 को प्रकाशित किया था।

✔आज इसकी चर्चा का अवसर क्यों आया यह भी जानना आवश्यक है। अमरीका की राजधानी वाशिंगटन के ‘यू एस कैपिटोल’ में दिल्ली के थिंक टैंक कहे जाने वाली संस्था “विवेकानंद इंटरनेशनल फाउंडेशन” द्वारा 2 मार्च को आयोजित एक कार्यक्रम में वहां के एक प्रभावशाली सांसद एड रॉयस ने अपने स्पष्ट विचार व्यक्त किये। उन्होंने जिहाद को नियंत्रित करने के लिये पाकिस्तान को परामर्श देते हुए कहा कि ” पाकिस्तान को अपने यहां चल रहे देवबंदी (Deobandi?) मदरसों को बंद करने के लिऐ गंभीरता से सोचना चाहिये । उनके अनुसार ऐसे लगभग 600 देवबंदी मदरसे पाकिस्तान में है जो लोगों को भ्रमित करते है। जिससे ये लोग जिहाद के पक्ष में दलीलें देते रहते है या जिहाद करते है” ।अमरीकी सांसद ने पाकिस्तान को समझाते हुए यह भी कहा कि “अगर वह आतंकवादी आक्रमणों के दोषियों को न्याय के कटघरे में किसी कारण वश नहीं लाना चाहता तो उन्हें अंतरराष्ट्रीय न्यायालय ‘ हेग ‘ को सौप देना चाहिये, जिससे वहां उनके विरुद्ध उचित कार्यवाही हो सके और सभी को न्याय मिलें “। सांसद महोदय में अपने कथन में लश्कर-ए-तोइबा जैसे आतंकी संगठनों पर कार्यवाही करने के साथ साथ ऐसे परिसरों को भी बंद करने की आवश्यकता पर जोर दिया।इस प्रकार अमरीकी सांसद के अपनी प्रभावशाली शैली में मानवतावादी संवेदनशीलता का परिचय देते हुए आतंकवाद को नियंत्रित करने के लिये देवबन्दी मदरसों की विचारधारा को प्रतिबंधित करने का एक सार्थक सुझाव देने का प्रयास किया है।

✔इसी देवबंद विचारधारा के संदर्भ में मुम्बई में 26 नवम्बर 2008 को हुए आतंकी हमलों के बाद अपने एक लेख में श्री मुज़फ्फर हुसैन ने लिखे थे।उसके अनुसार “उस समय आतंकी हमलों के बाद जो अनेक गुप्त जानकारियां व सूचनायें मिल रही थी उनसे पता चलता था कि देवबंद मदरसा आतंकवादियों का अड्डा है। यहां न केवल आतंकवादी जन्म लेते है बल्कि अन्य देशों में भी उनका निर्यात किया जाता है। क्योंकि देवबंद का मदरसा भारतीय उपखंड के मुसलमानों के लिए “मक्का” के समान है, इसलिये हमारी सरकारें इसके प्रति उदासीन रहती है। अगर कोई इसके विरुद्ध कुछ बोलता है तो तुरंत मुसलमान ‘मज़हब पर हमला’ कहकर हल्ला मचाने लगते है। इस मदरसे में देश-विदेश से मौलाना व मुफ्ती बनने के लिये मुस्लिम विद्यार्थी आते रहते है। इस संस्थान को भारतीयों के अतिरिक्त अन्य (मुस्लिम ) देशों से भी सहायता मिलती रहती है।इस देवबंदी मदरसे की छाप ऐसी है कि वह जो इस्लाम के विषय में कहता है उसे अंतिम शब्द माना जाता है । इसीलिये इस मदरसे के विरुद्ध बहावी और अहले हदीस पंथ का मुसलमान कुछ भी सुनना पसंद नहीं करता।भारत के मुसलमानों ने इसको जाने अनजाने में इस्लामी शिक्षा का ठेकेदार बना दिया है। इस मदरसे के मौलाना कुछ भी कहे उसे आसमान से उतरा हुआ सत्य समझ लिया जाता है। देवबंद केवल अपनी मज़हबी शिक्षा के लिये ही प्रसिद्ध नहीं है बल्कि “फतवे” जारी करने वाला भी सबसे बड़ा प्रतिष्ठान है। जब कभी उसके फतवे पर कोई मुसलमान अपनी प्रतिक्रिया व्यक्त करता है तो भारत सरकार निष्क्रिय हो जाती है। फतवो के सामने भारतीय संविधान व भारतीय दंड संहिता की धाराओं का कोई महत्व नहीं रहता “।

✔लेखक महोदय ने आगे लिखा है कि “जब 2008 में मुम्बई आतंकी हमला हुआ था तो सारी दुनिया सहम गयी थी । अनेक देश इस आतंकी हमलों को कैसे रोका जाये और आतंकवाद को किस प्रकार नष्ट किया जायें आदि पर विचार करने को विवश हो गये। संयुक्त राष्ट्र संघ (UNO) में पाकिस्तान के तत्कालीन प्रतिनिधि अब्दुल्ला हुसैन हारुन ने कहा कि ” यह देवबंदी उलेमाओं का दायित्व है कि उत्तर-पश्चिम सीमान्त प्रदेशो व कबाइली क्षेत्रो में आतंकवाद को समाप्त करने के लिये देवबंद पर शिकंजा कसें , क्योंकि आतंकवाद देवबंद मदरसे की कोख से जन्म लेता है” । उन्होंने( हुसैन) आगे कहा कि “भारत सरकार हम पर आतंकवाद को बढ़ावा देने का आरोप लगाती है, लेकिन वास्तविकता में पाकिस्तान में आतंकवाद का निर्यात भारत से होता है, जिसका जनक देवबंद मदरसा है”। उनके कहे अनुसार “अफगानिस्तान व पाकिस्तान में जो आतंकवाद फल फूल रहा है उसका एकमात्र जिम्मेदार देवबंद मदरसा ही है । साथ ही उन्होंने देवबंद के विरुद्ध मुस्लिम उलेमाओं को फ़तवा जारी करने को कहा जिससे इस भूभाग पर जिहादी पैदा होने बंद हो जायें”। परंतु देवबंद के समर्थकों ने पाकिस्तान के इन आरोपो की तीव्र भर्त्सना की थी और उल्टा पाकिस्तान को ही आतंक का जनक व तालिबान की शरणगाह बताया था।उनके समर्थकों ने यह भी कहा कि पाकिस्तान देवबंद का उसी समय से विरोधी है जबसे देवबंदियों ने पाकिस्तान के निर्माण का विरोध किया था।देवबंद वालो ने पाकिस्तानी प्रतिनिधि को ही षड्यंत्रकारी बताया।

✔परंतु श्री मुज़फ्फर हुसैन ने अपने लेख में स्पष्ट किया है कि ” पाकिस्तान के दूत ने जिस कड़वे सच को संयुक्त राष्ट्र संघ में उजागर किया उसे देवबंद के समर्थक व मौलाना कितना ही न माने लेकिन क्रोध में आदमी सच बोल जाता है । इस प्रकार पाकिस्तानी दूत हारुन ने दुनिया के सामने सच उगल दिया कि आतंकवाद का जनक केवल और केवल देवबंद है। अगर हारुन यह बात नहीं कहते तो भी दुनिया जानती है कि दुनिया में जिहाद का नारा कौन लगाता है ? एक मदरसे का काम पढ़ाना और छात्रों को बुद्धिमान बनाना होता है लेकिन देवबंद ने तो सारे मुसलमानों की हर बात का ठेका ले रखा है । वे सरकार और सर्वोच्च न्यायालय के निर्णयों के विरुद्ध आंदोलन करें , सरकार क्या पढ़ायें उसका निर्णय करें आदि आदि।संक्षेप में कहा जायें तो देवबंद का मदरसा शिक्षण संस्थान के साथ साथ मुसलमानों की राजनीति का भी एक अड्डा है बन चूका है। इसलिये अगर पाकिस्तानी दूत हारुन उन पर जो आरोप लगा रहें है उससे वे दूर नहीं भाग सकते ” । जिहाद, काफिर और दारुल-हरब जैसे घृणास्पद व वैमनस्यकारी मानसिकता बढ़ाने वाले शब्दों की सार्थकता क्या ये मदरसे वाले कभी मानवीय परिप्रेक्ष्य में प्रमाणित कर सकते है ? क्या इसके विरुद्ध इन्होंने कोई आंदोलन चलाया है ?

🔼उपरोक्त लेख में दिये गये विवरण से अमरीकी सांसद श्रीमान एड रॉयस की विचारधारा को जोड़ कर समझा जायें तो आतंकवाद पर अंकुश लगाने के लिये देवबंदी मदरसों की विचारधाराओं में या तो आवश्यक परिवर्तन किये जायें या फिर इनको प्रतिबंधित किया जाय जिससे वैश्विक जिहाद से मानवता की सुरक्षा सुनिश्चित की जा सकें ।

 

भवदीय

विनोद कुमार सर्वोदय

ग़ाज़ियाबाद

A Muslim Intellectual’s Realization About Islam

Subject: From the Heart of a Muslim – good one, worth reading!

From the Heart of a Muslim – good one, worth reading!

I was born a Muslim and lived all my life as a follower of Islam.

After the barbaric terrorist attacks done by the hands of my fellow Muslims everywhere on this globe, and after the too many violent acts by Islamists in many parts of the world, I feel responsible as a Muslim and as a human being to speak out and tell the truth to protect the world and Muslims as well from a coming catastrophe and war of civilizations.

I have to admit that our current Islamic teaching creates violence and hatred toward non-Muslims. We Muslims are the ones who need to change. Until now we have accepted polygamy, the beating of women by men, and killing those who convert from Islam to other religions.

We have never had a clear and strong stand against the concept of slavery or wars, to spread our religion and to subjugate others to Islam and force them to pay a humiliating tax called jizia. We ask others to respect our religion while all the time we curse non-Muslims loudly (in Arabic) in our Friday prayers in the mosques.

What message do we convey to our children when we call the Jews “descendants of the pigs and monkeys”? [Yet, both Arabs and Jews are descendants of Ibrahim (Abraham)!]   Is this a message of love and peace, or a message of hate?

I have been into [Christian] churches and [Jewish] synagogues where they were praying for Muslims. While all the time, we curse them, and teach our generations to call them “infidels”, and to hate them.

We immediately jump in a ‘knee jerk reflex’ to defend Prophet Mohammad when someone accuses him of being a pedophile while, at the same time, we are proud with the story in our Islamic books that he married a young girl seven years old [Aisha]when he was above 50 years old.

I am sad to say that many, if not most of us, rejoiced in happiness after September 11th and after many other terror attacks.

Muslims denounce these attacks to look good in front of the media, but we condone the Islamic terrorists and sympathize with their cause. Until now our ‘reputable’ top religious authorities have never issued a fatwa or religious statement to proclaim Bin Laden as an apostate, while an author, like Rushdie, was declared an apostate who should be killed according to Islamic Sharia law just for writing a book criticizing Islam.

Muslims demonstrated to get more religious rights as we did in France to stop the ban on the hijab (head scarf), while we did not demonstrate with such passion and in such numbers against the terrorist murders. It is our absolute silence against the terrorists that gives the energy to these terrorists to continue doing their evil acts.

We Muslims need to stop blaming our problems on others or on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict.   As a matter of honesty, Israel is the only light of democracy, civilization, and human rights in the whole Middle East.

We kicked out the Jews with no compensation or mercy from most of the Arab countries to make them “Jews-free countries” while Israel accepted more than a million Arabs to live there, have their own nationality, and enjoy their rights as human beings. In Israel, women cannot be beaten legally by men, and any person can change his/her belief system with no fear of being killed by the Islamic law of ‘apostasy,’ while in our Islamic world people do not enjoy any of these rights.

I agree that the ‘Palestinians’ suffer, but they suffer because of their corrupt leaders and not because of Israel.

It is not common to see Arabs who live in Israel leaving to live in the Arab world. On the other hand, we used to see thousands of Palestinians going to work with happiness in Israel, its ‘enemy.’   If Israel treats Arabs badly as some people claim, surely, we would have seen the opposite happening.

We Muslims need to admit our problems and face them. Only then we can treat them and start a new era to live in harmony with human mankind. Our religious leaders have to show a clear and very strong stand against polygamy, pedophilia, slavery, killing those who convert from Islam to other religions, beating of women by men, and declaring wars on non-Muslims to spread Islam.

Then, and only then, do we have the right to ask others to respect our religion. The time has come to stop our hypocrisy and say it openly: ‘We Muslims have to change.’

 

“I am a Muslim by faith, a Christian by spirit, a Jew by heart, and above all I am a human being.”   ~ Dr. Tawfik Hamid.

Dr. Hamid is an Egyptian scholar and author of the article above. The world needs more people like him—ones who have the courage to face up to reality.

==

If the intellectuals like the writer of this article cannot reform Islam, then they should quit Islam publicly providing rationale why they chose to quit Islam.  Else it would be hypocrisy to hold on to Islam.  – skanda987

 

गुरु ब्रह्मानन्द संस्कृत महाविद्यालय

उपरोक्त समाचार को अपनी पत्रिका में लगवाने की कृपा करें। जिससे लोगों को इसका लाभ मिल सके।

 

गुरु ब्रह्मानन्द फाऊंडेशन द्वारा संचालित

गुरु ब्रह्मानन्द संस्कृत महाविद्यालय

गुरु ब्रह्मानन्द आश्रम, सफीदों-126112, जीन्द, (हरियाणा)

 

संस्कृत प्रेमी सज्जनों को यह सहर्ष सूचना दी जाती है कि गुरु ब्रह्मानन्द आश्रम सफीदों, जिला-जीन्द (हरियाणा) में संस्कृत महाविद्यालय गत वर्ष से प्रारम्भ हो चुका है। कुरुक्षेत्र विश्वविद्यालय से मान्यता प्राप्त है जिसके अन्तर्गत विशारत, शास्त्री (बी.ए.), आचार्य (एम.ए.) की मान्यता है। 10वीं व 12वीं पास विद्यार्थी 1 अप्रैल से 31 जुलाई, 2017 तक कभी भी प्रवेश के लिए सम्पर्क कर सकते हैं।

 

यहाँ पर संस्कृत बोर्ड लखनऊ (उत्तर प्रदेश) की कक्षाओं (पूर्व मध्यमा और उत्तर मध्यमा) 9वीं से 12वीं का पाठ्यक्रम भी पढ़ाया जाता है। अतः छात्र ये परीक्षाएं यहां से भी दे सकते हैं। महाविद्यालय में संस्कृत के अतिरिक्त अंग्रेजी, गणित, विज्ञान, इतिहास एवं राजनीतिक शास्त्र आदि विषयों का अध्यापन भी योग्य प्राध्यापकों द्वारा कराया जाता है।

 

नोट :-    महाविद्यालय में वर्ष भर का कुल शुल्क 16,000/- रुपये होगा। जिसका प्रवेश के समय आधा खर्च 8,000/- रुपये देना होगा।

महाविद्यालय में छात्रावास एवं भोजन का विशेष प्रबन्ध है। छात्र मौसम अनुसार वस्त्र, बर्तन एवं पुस्तकें आदि दैनिक प्रयोग का सामान अपने साथ लाएं।

निवेदक

ब्रह्मचारी रामस्वरूप          महेन्द्र सिंह शास्त्री डाॅ. हरि सिंह शास्त्री

प्रधान     महासचिव           प्राचार्य

 

अधिक जानकारी के लिए सम्पर्क करें।

सम्पर्क सूत्र – 01686-262288, 8053662657, 9467721560

Ghanshyam Murari

Computer Operator

Sarvadeshik Arya Pratinidhi Sabha

“Dayanand Bhawan”

3/5 Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi-2

9015347660

हुतात्मा नाथूराम गोडसे का मृत्युपत्र

From: Pramod Agrawal < >

 

हुतात्मा नाथूराम गोडसे

नाथूराम का मृत्युपत्र

NOVEMBER 29, 2016 ABHISHEAK         LEAVE A COMMENT

प्रिय बन्धो चि. दत्तात्रय वि. गोडसे!

मेरे बीमा के रूपये आ जायेंगे तो उस रूपये का विनियोग अपने परिवार के लिए करना। रूपये 2000 आपके पत्नी के नाम पर, रूपये 3000 चि. गोपाल की धर्मपत्नी के नाम पर और रूपये 2000 आपके नाम पर। इस तरह से बीमा के कागजों पर मैंने रूपये मेरी मृत्यु के बाद मिलने के लिए लिखा है।मेरी उत्तरक्रिया करने का अधिकार अगर आपको मिलेगा तो आप अपनी इच्छा से किसी तरह से भी उस कार्य को सम्पन्न करना। लेकिन मेरी एक ही विशेष इच्छा यही लिखता हूँ।

अपने भारतवर्ष की सीमा रेखा सिंधु नदी है जिसके किनारों पर वेदों की रचना प्राचीन द्रष्टाओं ने की है।वह सिंधुनदी जिस शुभ दिन में फिर भारतवर्ष के ध्वज की छाया में स्वच्छंदता से बहती रहेगी उन दिनों में मेरी अस्थि या रक्षा का कुछ छोटा सा हिस्सा उस सिंधु नदी में बहा दिया जाएँ। मेरी यह इच्छा सत्यसृष्टि में आने के लिए शायद ओर भी एक दो पीढियों (Generations) का समय लग जाय तो भी चिन्ता नहीं। उस दिन तक वह अवशेष वैसे ही रखो। और आपके जीवन में वह शुभ दिन न आया तो आपके वारिसों को ये मेरी अन्तिम इच्छा बतलाते जाना। अगर मेरा न्यायालीन वक्तव्य को सरकार कभी बन्धमुक्त करेगी तो उसके प्रकाशन का अधिकार भी मैं आपको दे रहा हूँ।

मैंने 101 रूपये आपको आज दिये है जो आप सौराष्ट्र सोमनाथ मन्दिर पुनरोद्धार हो रहा है उसके कलश के कार्य के लिए भेज देना।

वास्तव में मेरे जीवन का अन्त उसी समय हो गया था जब मैंने गांधी पर गोली चलायी थी। उसके पश्चात मानो मैं समाधि में हूँ और अनासक्त जीवन बिता रहा हूँ। मैं मानता हूँ कि गांधी जी ने देश के लिए बहुत कष्ट उठाएँ, जिसके लिए मैं उनकी सेवा के प्रति और उनके प्रति नतमस्तक हूँ , किन्तु देश के इस सेवक को भी जनता को धोखा देकर मातृभूमि का विभाजन करने का अधिकार नहीं था।

मैं किसी प्रकार की दया नहीं चाहता और ना ही चाहता हूँ कि मेरी ओर से कोई दया की याचना करें। अपने देश के प्रति भक्ति-भाव रखना अगर पाप है तो मैं स्वीकार करता हूँ कि वह पाप मैंने किया है। अगर वह पुण्य है तो उससे जनित पुण्य पर मेरा नम्र अधिकार है। मुझे विश्वास है की मनुष्यों के द्वारा स्थापित न्यायालय से ऊपर कोई न्यायालय हो तो उसमें मेरे कार्य को अपराध नहीं समझा जायेगा। मैंने देश और जाति की भलाई के लिए यह कार्य किया है। मैंने उस व्यक्ति पर गोली चलाई जिसकी नीतियों के कारण हिन्दुओं पर घोर संकट आये और हिन्दू नष्ट हुए। मेरा विश्वास अडिग है कि मेरा कार्य ‘नीति की दृष्टि’ से पूर्णतया उचित है। मुझे इस बात में लेशमात्र भी सन्देह नहीं की भविष्य में किसी समय सच्चे इतिहासकार इतिहास लिखेंगे तो वे मेरे कार्य को उचित ठहराएंगे।

कुरूक्षेत्र और पानीपत की पावन भूमि से चलकर आने वाली हवा में अन्तिम श्वास लेता हूँ। पंजाब गुरू गोविंद की कर्मभूमि है। भगत सिंह, राजगुरू और सुखदेव यहाँ बलिदान हुए। लाला हरदयाल तथा भाई परमानंद इन त्यागमूर्तियों को इसी प्रांत ने जन्म दिया।

उसी पंजाब की पवित्र भूमि पर मैं अपना शरीर रखता हूँ। मुझे इस बात का संतोष है। खण्डित भारत का अखण्ड भारत होगा उसी दिन खण्डित पंजाब का भी पहले जैसा पूर्ण पंजाब होगा। यह शीघ्र हो यही अंतिम इच्छा !

आपका शुभेच्छु

नाथूराम वि. गोडसे

14-11-49

——————————————————————–

नाथूराम गोडसे द्वारा हस्तलिखित मृत्युपत्र की प्रति

-सौ▪ गाँधी वध क्यों?

 

हुतात्मा नाथूराम गोडसे

हुतात्मा नाथूराम गोड़से का ‘दिव्य संदेश’

NOVEMBER 29, 2016 ABHISHEAK         LEAVE A COMMENT

 

वास्तव में मेरे जीवन का उसी समय अंत हो गया था, जब मैंने गाँधी पर गोली चलाई थी। उसके पश्चात् मैं मानो समाधि में हूँ और अनासक्त जीवन बिता रहा हूँ।

मैं मानता हूँ कि गाँधी जी ने देश के लिए बहुत कष्ट उठाए, जिसके कारण मैं उनकी सेवा के प्रति एवं उनके प्रति नतमस्तक हूँ, किन्तु देश के इस सेवक को भी जनता को धोखा देकर मातृभूमि के विभाजन का अधिकार नहीं था।

मैं किसी प्रकार की दया नहीं चाहता हूँ। मैं यह भी नहीं चाहता हूँ कि मेरी ओर से कोई दया की याचना करे।

अपने देश के प्रति भक्ति-भाव रखना यदि पाप है तो मैं स्वीकार करता हूँ कि वह पाप मैंने किया है। यदि वह पुण्य है तो उससे जनित पुण्य-पद पर मेरा नम्र अधिकार है।

मेरा विश्वास अडिग है कि मेरा कार्य नीति की दृष्टि से पूर्णतया उचित है। मुझे इस बात में लेशमात्र भी सन्देह नहीं कि भविष्य में किसी समय सच्चे इतिहासकार लिखेंगे तो वे मेरे कार्य को उचित ठहराएँगे।

-हुतात्मा नाथूराम गोड़से

हुतात्मा नाथूराम जी की अस्थियाँ

हुतात्मा नाथूराम गोडसे

हुतात्मा नाथूराम जी की अस्थियाँ

NOVEMBER 29, 2016 ABHISHEAK         LEAVE A COMMENT

 

नाथूराम गोड़से और नारायण आपटे के अन्तिम संस्कार के बाद उनकी राख उनके परिवार वालों को नहीं सौंपी गई थी। जेल अधिकारियों ने अस्थियों और राख से भरा मटका रेल्वे पुल के उपर से घग्गर नदी में फ़ेंक दिया था। दोपहर बाद में उन्हीं जेल कर्मचारियों में से किसी ने बाजार में जाकर यह बात एक दुकानदार को बताई, उस दुकानदार ने तत्काल यह खबर एक स्थानीय हिन्दू महासभा कार्यकर्ता इन्द्रसेन शर्मा तक पहुँचाई। इन्द्रसेन उस वक्त “द ट्रिब्यून” के कर्मचारी भी थे। शर्मा ने तत्काल दो महासभाईयों को साथ लिया और दुकानदार द्वारा बताई जगह पर पहुँचे। उन दिनों नदी में उस जगह सिर्फ़ छ्ह इंच गहरा ही पानी था, उन्होंने वह मटका वहाँ से सुरक्षित निकालकर स्थानीय कॉलेज के एक प्रोफ़ेसर ओमप्रकाश कोहल को सौंप दिया, जिन्होंने आगे उसे डॉ एलवी परांजपे को नाशिक ले जाकर सुपुर्द किया। उसके पश्चात वह अस्थि-कलश 1965 में नाथूराम गोड़से के छोटे भाई गोपाल गोड़से तक पहुँचा दिया गया, जब वे जेल से रिहा हुए। फ़िलहाल यह कलश पूना में उनके निवास पर उनकी अन्तिम इच्छा के मुताबिक सुरक्षित रखा हुआ है।

हुतात्मा नाथूराम गोडसे

नाथूराम गोड़से का न्यायालय में दिए गए ब्यान का सारांश

NOVEMBER 29, 2016 ABHISHEAK         LEAVE A COMMENT

 

“मुझे सपष्ट दिखाई देता था कि यदि मैं गाँधी जी का वध करूँगा तो मुझे जड़ मूल से नष्ट कर दिया जाएगा। लोग मुझसे घृणा करेंगे और मेरा आत्मसम्मान जो मुझे प्राणों से अधिक प्रिय है वो नष्ट हो जाएगा। किन्तु साथ में मैं ये भी जानता था कि गांधी जी सदा-सदा के लिए विदा हो जाएँगे और देश नपुंसक तत्व अहिंसा को त्यागकर शक्तिशाली बनेगा। मैं अवश्य मरूँगा लेकिन देश अत्याचारों से मुक्त होगा। सब मुझे देशद्रोही और मूर्ख कहेंगे पर देश ऐसे मार्ग पर चलेगा जो उचित होगा। ये सब सोचकर 30 जनवरी 1948 के दिन मैंने गांधी का वध किया।

मेरे पास कहने के लिए और कुछ नहीं है। अगर देशभक्ति पाप है तो मैं मानता हूँ कि मैंने ये पाप किया है।”

नाथूराम गोडसे : न्यायालय में दिए गए ब्यान का सारांश , दिल्ली 8 नवंबर 1948 अभियुक्त क्रमांक

सौजन्य :- पुस्तक “गांधी वध क्यों”

 

A letter From A persecuted Hindu, India

From: Deepak Das < >

From: A persecuted Hindu,India.

Dear All,

Good Morning to all respected patriots,

Whatever is happening in USA today had already taken place in India years ago. India was the land of wisdom. Mother of all civilizations, religion, tradition and languages. It was destroyed, devastated, mutilated, partitioned and still bleeding because of the unholy nexus of Communists + Muslims + Establishments. The wisdom was covered by the E.F.G. syndrome. E=Ego, F=Fear and G=Gain and Greed (Petty & Personal).

The whole world will entail the same fate today or tomorrow because of Communists +Muslims+ Establishments. Hereby forwarding one letter of a victimized Kashmiri Hindu to tell you the heart-rendering story of the sad plight of Hindus of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh.

If you are in a position to change the system, take bold step to counteract the nefarious activities of demoniacal trio.

 

Open letter to Shehla Rashid (JNU) from a Kashmiri Hindu

 

Shehla Rashid,

 

I am Aditya Tikoo. It was the morning of 19th January 1990. I (then 5) was playing with my mother on the bed. She was 7 months pregnant. She took me in her lap and asked – “what do you want – baby brother or sister?”. “Brother” – I replied. She kissed my forehead and held her hand on my head in affection.

Suddenly we heard a noise outside. It was some mob that was nearing our house. It kept getting noisy with each moment. My father who had gone outside rushed into the house and came to our room. I saw his eyes full of fear for the first time. He was a school master in Srinagar. “They are coming”, he said.

I felt my mother’s grip around me was tightened suddenly. I looked at her face. She fainted. I asked, what happened? She almost cried, said- nothing Bachcha. She covered me with her shawl. I could clearly hear her heartbeats as my ears were pushed against her. Her heart was beating abnormally. I could not see her face now. It was all dark inside. But now I could realize, she was wiping her tears.

The procession was now outside our locality which had 7-8 Hindu homes. Someone from the mob shouted – “That’s the master’s house”. And then started the announcement from the nearby mosques – “Asi gachchi Pakistan, Batao roas te Batanev san” (we want to become Pakistan with Hindu women not with their men). It was announced by the mob. All men must leave valley leaving behind their women. Some of them kicked the gate and pelted stones at the window. We were terrified. I was in mother’s arms. Who was shivering. Carrying three hearts. Two within, one in arms.

Mosques started making announcements after announcements. It was a recorded cassette with Islamic songs warning the idolaters. To free Kashmir from Kufra. Azadi ka matlab kya La ilaah illillaah.

Few minutes later, 3-4 males from the locality knocked the door. My father opened it in fear. They were Hindu neighbors. Came to inform we are leaving in 2 hours. They have gone mad. They won’t listen to us. They won’t let us live anymore. This is our last day in valley.

While they were discussing how to flee, those words of mob – Asi gachchi Pakistan, Batao roas te Batanev san were playing in my mind endlessly. I only knew a woman in my life. She was my mother. I asked myself, what will they do with my mother? Why do they want her for Pakistan? I asked after a silence – Maa, what are they saying? Who are they? Why will they take you away? Will I go with you?

Na bachcha. I am your mother. I will be with you always – she cried bursting into tears.

In few hours, my father arranged tickets for us. Mother packed a few things – some jewellery, cash and a Shiva Ling. I was looking at her in fear while she was packing. She was constantly crying. She consoled me a couple of times and pretended she is fine. But I knew she wasn’t.

We left home in the noise of loudspeakers from mosques. I can still hear those voices. Those aggressive tones, words and call for action. I could see skullcaps around staring at us with the glare of victory. Eyes that wanted to peel the skin off my mother and eat her flesh.

My father tried to pick me up since mother was advised not to lift heavy things. I thought if I leave her, she will go with mob.

I cried like never before. I said – Maa take me with you. Don’t leave. She tried to explain- I am not leaving. I am with you. Just be with Dad. I refused. My father cried for the first time. He forcibly snatched me from mother again. I was so terrified that I almost felt unconscious.

When I got my consciousness back, I found myself in mother’s lap in the bus. She was crying and thanking God. We fled the valley. There were thousands like us. We lived in a tent in Jammu for next 2 months. A lot happened there.

My mother had miscarriage. She lost the child. She lost the smile forever. A few years ago, I got to know the full story. When I fell unconscious, she did not let Dad touch me. She carried me for all the time so that when I open my eyes, I find her right in front. Because this is what I wanted. To be carried by her. She walked and ran for 5 long kilometers carrying two children – one in arms, one inside to catch the bus. She got the bus but lost her other child.

We are settled in Delhi now. With her sacrifice and blessings, I am doing well in life. My mother doesn’t talk much.

Listen Shehla Rashid, I am not a storyteller. Neither are you some dear to me with whom I wanted to share what I never did till today.

I just want you to know one thing. Whenever my mother listens to the Azadi slogans or Kashmiriyat or La ilah illillaah on TV in Kashmir or Delhi, she sees her child bleeding to death. She cries in other room. Thinking about her child. Who was snatched away from him by the slogans of Azadi, Pakistan and La ilaah illillaah.

Your slogans and defense of Azadi lovers remind my mother of her child who was brutally murdered by you, your fathers and Islamists.

Thus, you are my enemy. Whenever someone tries to harm you or slaps you or beats you or threatens you, I feel he is standing with me for my lost sibling who I never saw. Whenever someone silences the voices of Azadi, hum le ke rahenge azadi, hum kya chahte azadi etc. whether Army in Kashmir or people like ABVP or Agniveer in Delhi, we feel as if someone is coming to rescue us and our lost baby.

I find you personally responsible for tears of blood my mother shed all these years. You and millions of Azadi seeker Islamist swines are the reasons she has never smiled since 19th January 1989. She is the victim. You are the attackers. Game will begin now.

You Jihadis will be slapped, beaten up and destroyed wherever you are. Those whom army can’t shoot, will be taken care of by us. You cry victim. We will beat you more. For our mother’s blood. For her tears. For her lost child. For her lost smile.

For all those hundreds of mothers whom you raped. For all mothers whom you abducted and snatched away from their children forever. Mothers who are still missing from the valley. Mothers whose breasts were cut off with the slogans of Allahu Akbar. Mothers whose private parts were mutilated with slogans of Islam Zindabad. Mothers whose thighs were tattooed with Islam Zindabad. Mothers whom you disrobed. Mothers whom you forced to parade naked in front of their children.

Whatever has happened to you is just a trailer. You cry that a few stones hit you and gave you scratches. Know that my mother almost bled to death. My mother saw her child bleed to death. Yours is a drama. Hers was real.

We swear to the dignity of all those mothers. All rapist Jihadi Kashmiri Islamists will be silenced by all means. Kashmir is not yours. Forget about it. Forever.

 

– From a real Kashmiri and son of Mother India

By: K Bharat on Friday, February 24th, 2017

 

Shiv Sena, BJP, Congress, Hindu Raastra

From: Pramod Agrawal < >

महाराष्ट्र के हिंदुओं ने कोंग्रेस और एनसीपी की देशद्रोही तथा हिंदूद्रोही नीतियों से त्रस्त हो कर बीजेपी और शिवसेना जैसी हिंदुत्ववादी देशभक्त पार्टियों को वोट दे कर विजयी बनाया लेकिन यदि शिवसेना मात्र अपना मेयर बनाने के लोभ में देशद्रोही और हिन्दूद्रोही कोंग्रेस का आश्रय लेती है तो क्या यह हिंदुओं के  साथ विश्वासघात नहीं होगा ?* 
*और क्या कोंग्रेसी ब्लैकमेल करके शिवसेना को हिंदूद्रोही नीतियों के लिये बाध्य नहीं करेंगे ? 
*और अगले चुनावों में शिवसेना क्या दुबारा देशभक्त हिंदुओं का वोट प्राप्त कर वर्तमान सीट संख्या रख सकेगी या कोंग्रेस की तरह डूब जायेगी ?*

 *ये मेरी निजी सोच है पसंद आये तो अपना समर्थन दीजिये*…..

अगर तीन तलाक़ के नियम का निर्णय सुप्रीम कोर्ट नही कर सकती, क्युकि इससे मुस्लिम भाइयों के धर्म और मन को ठेस पहुचती है; और
 इसका मामला सिर्फ मुस्लिम पर्सनल ला बोर्ड तय करेगी………😡😡😡

तो उस सुप्रीम कोर्ट को कोई हक़ नही बनता की राम मन्दिर के निर्माण का फ़ैसला वो करे। इसका फ़ैसला भी हिंदू धर्म के संगठन ही करेंगे, 
 क्यूकी ऐसा न करने से 100 करोड़ हिन्दुओं के मन को ठेस पहुँचती है.. सुप्रीम कोर्ट किसी एक समुदाय को लेकर नही चल सकती..

बात ऊपर तक जानी चाहिये..इतना शेयर करो कि ये सोच भी एक मुद्दा बन जाय..
*जय श्री राम*

 

 

नालंदा के बहाने अतीत की महानताओं से मुलाकात

From Pramod Agrawal < >

नालंदा के बहाने अतीत की महानताओं से मुलाकात..
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

कल पटना से दिल्ली की ओर बढ़े तो सोचा कि क्यों न कुछ दर्शनीय स्थानों को देखते चलें। एक-दो वरिष्ठ रिश्तेदारों और बिहार में पोस्टेड दोस्तों से सलाह ली; बिहार का नक्शा उठाया और अपने भीतर के कोलंबस को जगाकर रास्ता निर्धारित किया। योजना बनी कि पहले दिन नालंदा, पावापुरी, राजगीर, गहलौर और बोधगया को कवर किया जाए। वक़्त की कमी के चलते पावापुरी और गहलौर ठीक से नहीं देख पाए, पर बाकी तीन जगहों को ठीक से ‘जिया’।

पहला पड़ाव था- नालंदा। मेरे मन में उसकी छवि यही थी कि वह गुप्त काल में विकसित हुआ एक शानदार विश्वविद्यालय था जिसमें पढ़ने की आकांक्षा लेकर देश-विदेश के बड़े-बड़े जिज्ञासु और शोधार्थी खिंचे चले आते थे। एक बात और सुनी हुई थी कि जब बख्तियार खिलजी ने इसे नष्ट करने के लिये इसकी लाइब्रेरी में आग लगाई थी तो करीब 6 महीनों तक आग जलती रही थी। दंतकथाओं में अक्सर अतिशयोक्तियाँ शामिल हो जाती हैं – इस तर्क से 6 महीनों वाली बात को तथ्य न मानें तो भी इतना तो मान ही सकते हैं कि यहाँ एक अत्यंत समृद्ध पुस्तकालय रहा होगा।

खैर, हम लोग इसी कच्ची-पक्की समझ के साथ नालंदा पहुँचे। वहाँ पुरातत्त्व सर्वेक्षण विभाग ने एक बोर्ड पर नालंदा से जुड़ी बुनियादी जानकारियाँ प्रकाशित की हुई हैं। उस बोर्ड को पढ़ते ही मेरे पैरों तले ज़मीन खिसक गई। उस पर कुछ दार्शनिकों/चिंतकों के नाम लिखे थे जिन्होंने नालंदा में रहकर अध्ययन या अध्यापन कार्य किया था। उस सूची में नागार्जुन, आर्यदेव, वसुबंधु और असंग जैसे महान आचार्यों के नाम पढ़कर मन विह्वल हो गया। अज्ञेय की सिद्ध-कविता ‘असाध्यवीणा’ से एक पंक्ति उधार लेकर कहूँ तो “ध्यान मात्र इनका तो गदगद विह्वल कर देने वाला है”…

कहानी कुछ यूँ है कि बुद्ध की मृत्यु के बाद उनके अनुयायी हीनयान और महायान में बँट गए थे। हीनयान बुद्ध के विचारों के नज़दीक था पर अपनी कठिन मान्यताओं (जैसे निरीश्वरवाद, अनात्मवाद, क्षणिकवाद, निर्वाण की अभावात्मक धारणा और अर्हत) के कारण लोकहृदय में रस उत्पन्न करने में असमर्थ था। हिंदू परंपरा के लोग भी उसे अपनाने में बहुत सहजता महसूस नहीं करते थे क्योंकि यह उनकी परंपरागत धारणाओं से काफी दूर था। इस संकट को दूर करने के लिये बौद्ध परंपरा में महायान की शुरुआत हुई जो आसान और रसपूर्ण रास्ता तो था ही; साथ ही कई वैदिक तथा औपनिषदिक धारणाओं के समावेशन के कारण हिंदू समाज के लिये सुग्राह्य भी था। इस मुश्किल काम को जिन आचार्यों ने अंजाम दिया, लगभग वे सारे नालंदा से ही जुड़े थे। यह महत्कार्य इसी विश्वविद्यालय में संपन्न हुआ था।

नागार्जुन, जो इस विश्वविद्यालय के कुलपति भी रहे थे, अपने शिष्य आर्यदेव के साथ महायान की अत्यंत प्रसिद्ध शाखा माध्यमिक शून्यवाद के प्रवर्तक थे। शून्यवाद के सटीक अर्थ विनिश्चयन में बहुत वाद-विवाद हुए हैं। अब लगभग सहमति है कि ‘शून्यता’ का अर्थ ‘निषेध’ या ‘निहिलिज़्म’ नहीं बल्कि ‘अवर्णनीयता’ या ‘अनिर्वचनीयता’ है। नागार्जुन के ही शब्दों में कहूँ तो यह जगत और पारमार्थिक सत्य दोनों अलग-अलग कारणों से अनिर्वचनीय अर्थात शून्य हैं। जगत एक सामूहिक तथा विराट भ्रम है जिसका मिथ्यात्व परमार्थ का बोध होने पर ही होता है।

सच कहूँ तो नागार्जुन की वैचारिकी भारतीय अमूर्त विचारणा का चरम स्तर है; जिसे हीगेल, फिक्टे और शेलिंग की महान जर्मन परंपरा भी ठोस चुनौती नहीं दे पाती। ब्राह्मणवादी तथा वेदांत-समर्थक दार्शनिक शंकराचार्य के पक्ष में चाहे जितने भी तर्क जुटा लें, इस सच को झुठलाना संभव नहीं है कि शंकर के दर्शन का बुनियादी ढाँचा ठीक वही है जो नागार्जुन उनसे करीब 600 वर्ष पहले प्रस्तावित कर चुके थे। इसे सिर्फ संयोग कहकर टालना शुतुरमुर्गी मुद्रा है, कुछ और नहीं। सच यही है कि शंकर इस परिप्रेक्ष्य में ‘प्रच्छन्न बौद्ध’ ठहरते हैं।

महायान की दूसरी महान परंपरा ‘योगाचार विज्ञानवाद’ भी नालंदा में ही विकसित हुई। आचार्य असंग और वसुबंधु, जो आपस में अर्ध-भ्राता भी थे, एक साथ नालंदा में रहकर इस मौलिक वैचारिकी को धार दे रहे थे। उन्होंने नागार्जुन से आगे बढ़कर यह कल्पना की कि वास्तविक जगत जैसी कोई चीज़ है ही नहीं। हम अनुभव में सिर्फ अनुभूत-विज्ञानों को ही जानते हैं और उनके आधार पर वस्तुजगत की कपोल कल्पना कर लेते हैं। यह दर्शन लोक-अनुभवों की आसान समझ को ख़ारिज करने के कारण विश्वास का कम, कौतूहल का विषय ज़्यादा रहा है। मैं तो इसलिये इससे इतना प्रभावित हूँ कि अगर यह न होता तो हम पश्चिम के बर्कले और लाइबनिज़ जैसे प्रत्ययवादी दार्शनिकों की टक्कर में अपना कोई विचार न रख पाते। पश्चिमी दर्शन के सम्राट ‘कांट’ का ‘अज्ञेयवाद’ हो या एडमंड हुस्सर्ल का ‘संवृत्तिवाद’, हम ‘विज्ञानवाद’ के सहारे सभी को गहराई के मामले में स्पर्धा दे सकते हैं।

अब आप सोचिये कि जब मुझे पता चला होगा कि ये सारे महान आचार्य इस जगह व्याख्यान देते थे; यहाँ बैठते/घूमते थे और इस प्रस्तर-भवन में रहते थे तो मुझ पर क्या गुज़री होगी? एक बार वर्धा में एक संग्रहालय में बताया गया कि जिस कुर्सी पर आप बैठे हैं, उस पर कभी महात्मा गांधी बैठते थे। इतना सुनते ही करंट सा लगा था और फिर उस पर बैठने का साहस नहीं हुआ था। यही हाल निराला, वर्ड्सवर्थ और ग़ालिब के मकानों में लिपटी उनकी यादों को महसूस करते हुए हुआ था।

इसी भाव-बिंदु पर नालंदा के मौन पत्थरों को हौले से थपथपाकर शुक्रिया कह आया हूँ…