Category: Islam

Can Muslims be good Americans?

From: “PAT KOENIG” < >

 

Please take the time to read this.

Can this be the next war ???

 

Can Muslims be good Americans?

 

This is very interesting and we all need to read it from start to finish.  And send it on to everyone.  Maybe this is why our American Muslims are so quiet and not speaking out about any atrocities. 

 

Can a good Muslim be a good American?  

 

This question was forwarded to a friend who worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years. The following is his reply:

 

Theologically – no.

Because: his allegiance is to Allah, The moon god of Arabia.  

 

Religiously – no.

Because: no other religion is accepted by his Allah except Islam. (Quran, 2:256)(Koran)  

 

Scripturally – no.

Because: his allegiance is to the five Pillars of Islam and the Quran.

 

Geographically – no.

Because: his allegiance is to Mecca, to which he turns in prayer five times a day.

 

Socially – no.

Because: his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews.

 

Politically – no.

Because: he must submit to the mullahs (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and destruction of America, the great Satan.

 

Domestically – no.

Because: he is instructed to marry four Women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him. (Quran 4:34)

 

Intellectually – no.

Because: he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt.

 

Philosophically – no. 

Because: Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran does not allow freedom of religion and expression. Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist.  Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic.  

 

Spiritually – no.

Because: when we declare ‘one nation under God,’  The Christian’s God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as Heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in the Quran’s 99 excellent names.  

 

Therefore, after much study and deliberation..

 

Perhaps we should be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country.

 

They obviously cannot be both ‘good’ Muslims and ‘good’ Americans. 

 

Call it what you wish it’s still the truth—you had better believe it.

The more who understand this, the better it will be for our country and our future.

 

The religious war is bigger than we know or understand!

 

Footnote: The Muslims have said they will destroy us from within.

 

SO FREEDOM IS NOT FREE.

 

THE MARINES WANT THIS TO ROLL ALL OVER THE U.S.

 

Please share this with freedom lovers.

 

Kashmiri Pandits offered three choices by radical Islamists

Kashmiri Pandits offered three choices by radical Islamists
— Col Tek Kumar Tikoo

 

What happened to Kashmiri Pandits in 1990? Hum Log program telecast by NDTV India on 22/1/2012 where Pandits (only they were invited) shares scary experiences of what their community went through.

 

http://www.ndtv.com/video/player/hum-log/video-story/221781

 

http://www.indiandefencereview.com/news/kashmiri-pandits-offered-three-choices-by-radical-islamists/

 

Kashmiri Pandits offered three choices by radical Islamists 

by Col Tek Kumar Tikoo 22/11/2012

 

On Jan, 04, 1990, a local Urdu newspaper, Aftab, published a press release issued by Hizb-ul-Mujahideen, asking all Pandits to leave the Valley immediately. Al Safa, another local daily repeated the warning. These warnings were followed by Kalashnikov-wielding masked Jehadis carrying out military-type marches openly. Reports of killing of Kashmiri Pandits continued to pour in. Bomb explosions and sporadic firing by militants became a daily occurrence.

 

Explosive and inflammatory speeches being broadcast from the public address systems of the mosques became frequent. Thousands of audio cassettes, carrying similar propaganda, were played at numerous places in the Valley, in order to instill fear into the already terrified Kashmiri Pandit community. Recalling these events, the former Director General of Jammu and Kashmir Police, Shri M M Khajooria says, “The mischief of the summer of 1989 started with serving notice to the prominent members of the minority community to quit Kashmir.

 

The letter said, ‘We order you to leave Kashmir immediately, otherwise your children will be harmed- we are not scaring you but this land is only for Muslims, and is the land of Allah. Sikhs and Hindus cannot stay here’. The threatening note ended with a warning, ‘If you do not obey, we will start with your children. Kashmir Liberation, Zindabad.”1

These slogans, broadcast from the loud speakers of every mosque, numbering roughly 1100, exhorted the hysterical mobs to embark on Jehad.

 

They signaled the implementation of their intentions quite blatantly. M. L. Bhan of Khonmoh, Srinagar, a government employee, was killed on Jan 15, 1990. Baldev Raj Dutta, an operator in Lal chowk, Srinagar, was kidnapped on the same day. His dead body was found four days later, on Jan 19, 1990, at Nai Sarak, Srinagar. The body bore tell-tale marks of brutal torture.

 

Night of Jan, 19, 1990

The night witnessed macabre happenings, the like of which had not been witnessed by Kashmiri Pandits after the Afghan rule. Those that experienced the fear of that night are unlikely to forget it in their life time. For future generations, it will be a constant reminder of the brutality of Islamic radicals, who had chosen the timing very carefully. “Farooq Abdullah, whose government had all but seized to exist, resigned. Jagmohan arrived during the day to take charge as the Governor of the State.”2 He took over the charge of the Governor just the previous night at Jammu. He had made efforts to reach Srinagar during the previous day, but the plane had to return to Jammu from Pir Panjal Pass, due to extremely bad weather. Though curfew was imposed to restore some semblance of order, it had little effect. The mosque pulpits continued to be used to exhort people to defy curfew and join Jehad against the Pandits, while armed cadres of JKLF marched through the streets of the Valley, terrorizing them no end.

 

As the night fell, the microscopic community became panic-stricken when the Valley began reverberating with the war-cries of Islamists, who had stage-managed the whole event with great care; choosing its timing and the slogans to be used. A host of highly provocative, communal and threatening slogans, interspersed with martial songs, incited the Muslims to come out on the streets and break the chains of ‘slavery’. These exhortations urged the faithful to give a final push to the Kafir in order to ring in the true Islamic order. These slogans were mixed with precise and unambiguous threats to Pandits. They were presented with three choices — Ralive, Tsaliv ya Galive (convert to Islam, leave the place or perish). Tens of thousands of Kashmiri Muslims poured into the streets of the Valley, shouting  ‘death to India’ and death to Kafirs.

 

These slogans, broadcast from the loud speakers of every mosque, numbering roughly 1100, exhorted the hysterical mobs to embark on Jehad. All male Muslims, including their children and the aged, wanted to be seen to be participating in this Jehad. Those who had organized such a show of force in the middle of a cold winter night, had only one objective; to put the fear of death into the hearts of the already frightened Pandits. In this moment of collective hysteria, gone was the facade of secular, tolerant, cultured, peaceful and educated outlook of Kashmiri Muslims, which the Indian intelligentsia and the liberal media had made them to wear for their own reasons.

 

Most of the Kashmiri Muslims behaved as if they did not know who the Pandits were.

Most of the Kashmiri Muslims behaved as if they did not know who the Pandits were. This frenzied mass hysteria went on till Kashmiri Pandits’ despondency turned into desperation, as the night wore itself out.

 

For the first time after independence of India from the British rule, Kashmiri Pandits found themselves abandoned to their fate, stranded in their own homes, encircled by rampaging mobs. Through the frenzied shouts and blood-curdling sloganeering of the assembled mobs, Pandits saw the true face of in­tolerant and radical Islam. It represented the complete antithesis of the over-rated ethos of Kashmiriyat that was supposed to define Kashmiri ethos.

The pusillanimous Central Government

was caught napping and its agencies in the State, particularly the army and other para military forces, did not consider it necessary to intervene, in the absence of any orders. The State Government had been so extensively subverted that the skeleton staff of the administration at Srinagar (the winter capital of the State had shifted to Jammu in November 1989) decided not to confront the huge mobs. Delhi was too far away, anyway.

 

Hundreds of Kashmiri Pandits phoned everyone in authority at Jammu, Srinagar and Delhi, to save them from the sure catastrophe that awaited them.

 

Hundreds of Kashmiri Pandits phoned everyone in authority at Jammu, Srinagar and Delhi, to save them from the sure catastrophe that awaited them. The pleadings for help were incessant. But not a soldier came to their rescue. Therefore, Kashmiri Pandits found best protection in huddling together indoors, frozen with fear, praying for the night to pass. The foreboding of the impending doom was too over-powering to let them have even a wink of sleep.

 

The Pandits could see the writing on the wall. If they were lucky enough to see the night through, they would have to vacate the place before they met the same fate as Tikka Lal Taploo and many others. The Seventh Exodus was surely staring them in the face. By morning, it became apparent to Pandits that Kashmiri Muslims had decided to throw them out from the Valley. Broadcasting vicious Jehadi sermons and revolutionary songs, interspersed with blood curdling shouts and shrieks, threatening Kshmiri Pandis with dire consequences, became a routine ‘Mantra’ of the Muslims of the Valley, to force them to flee from Kashmir. Some of the slogans used were:

 

“Zalimo, O Kafiro, Kashmir harmara chod do”.

(O! Merciless, O! Kafirs leave our Kashmir)

 

“Kashmir mein agar rehna hai, Allah-ho-Akbar kahna hoga”

(Anyone wanting to live in Kashmir will have to convert to Islam)

La Sharqia la gharbia, Islamia! Islamia!

From East to West, there will be only Islam

 

“Musalmano jago, Kafiro bhago”,

 (O! Muslims, Arise, O! Kafirs, scoot)

 

“Islam hamara maqsad hai, Quran hamara dastur hai, jehad hamara Rasta hai”

(Islam is our objective, Q’uran is our constitution, Jehad is our way of our life)

 

“Kashmir banega Pakistan”

(Kashmir will become Pakistan)

 

“Kashir banawon Pakistan, Bataw varaie, Batneiw saan”

(We will turn Kashmir into Pakistan along with Kashmiri Pandit women, but without their men folk.)

 

“Pakistan se kya Rishta? La Ilah-e- Illalah”

(Islam defines our relationship with Pakistan)

 

Dil mein rakho Allah ka khauf; Hath mein rakho Kalashnikov.

(With fear of Allah ruling your hearts, wield a Kalashnikov)

“Yahan kya chalega, Nizam-e- Mustafa”

(We want to be ruled under Shari’ah)

 

“People’s League ka kya paigam, Fateh, Azadi aur Islam”

(“What is the message of People’s League? Victory, Freedom and Islam.”)

 

Wall posters in fairly large letters, proclaiming Kashmir as ‘Islamic Republic of Kashmir’, became a com­mon sight in the entire Valley. So were the big and prominent advertisements in local dailies, proclaiming their intent:

 

‘Aim of the present struggle is the supremacy of Islam in Kashmir, in all walks of life and nothing else. Anyone who puts a hurdle in our way will be annihilated’.

Press release of Hizb-ul-Mujahideen (HM) published in the morning edition of Urdu Daily ‘Aftab’ of April, 01, 1990.

 

Click to buy

‘Kashmiri Pandits responsible for duress against Muslims should leave the Valley within two days’.

Head lines of Urdu Daily, Al Safa, of April, 14, 1990.

‘With Kalashnikov in one hand and Quran in the other the Mujahids would openly roam the streets singing the Tarana-e- Kashmir.’

 

Notes:

  1. Shri M M Khajooria, former Director General of Jammu and Kashmir Police.
  2. Kanchan Gupta: Pioneer, Aug 10, 2008.

 

 

Warm Regards
sanjeev nayyar

 

Alarming Situation for Hindu Dharma and Culture

From: B L Wali < >

Alarming Situation for Hindu Dharma and Culture

During last twenty two years of militancy in J&K state especially in Kashmir valley which is now populated by Muslims only. The fundamentalist Molvi’s from UP and other places visit Kashmir to spread “Wahbi“ Islam there. The Muslims in Kashmir were generally followers of “Sufism” (a soft and secular Islam) and would make frequent visits to Dharghas of Sufi saints to offer prayers.

 

These radical preachers (molvis) give sermons to the people in the mosques during the Friday prayers to make them hard believers in wahbi Islam and its aim and objectives. They say…

 

1) For every true Muslim there is directive (fatwa) to spread Islam throughout the world by destroying the other religions and their culture by whatever means available to them.

 

2) In India (pre partition) the target was Hindu’s (which includes Sikhs, Jain’s and Buddhists) and their Dharma and Culture. Muslim fighters came to India first to take away as much wealth as possible and then finally established the Islamic rule.

 

3) We Muslims then started the mass conversion of Hindus into Islam with the help of Muslim rulers through different methods. About 40 % of the Hindu’s in India (pre partition) were converted into Islamic faith till the takeover by the Colonial Power. In this process we destroyed a number of their places of learning and cultural centers.

 

4) After the exit of colonial power we resumed the process of conversion into Islamic faith. Since we doubted the support the new ruling classes in this mission, so we had to change the strategy.

 

5) We started asking for a separate home land for Muslims and managed to take away about one third of the pre partition India. We made sure that important cultural centers and places of learning of Hindus, especially in Sindh are included in it we called this land as Pakistan (pious land) To make Hindus happy we called the rest as Hindustan. During the partition of India we ensured that Pakistan remains free from Hindus and keep as many Muslims in Hindustan as possible.

 

6) Immediately after partition we took up the job of destroying the Hindu culture centers and important places of learning in Pakistan. This was followed by the conversion of left over Hindus into Islam. We succeeded in this mission and today there are only the few Hindus there.

 

7) In Hindustan we first saw that the Hindustan was called by pre partition name i.e. India which is secular and the Muslim population started expanding very fast and demanding equal rights. In this case we are thankful to the ruling class and especially principal ruling family. Some say that this family has Mughal (Muslim) roots and not Hindus. Hindu society is a victim of cast system which was first exploited by colonial power to establish their rule and now it is exploited by the political parties in their struggle for power.

 

8) In present India there are some important pilgrimage centers viz Ayodha , Mathura, Haridwar etc. We have succeeded in blocking their development and construction of temples especially at Ayodhya to ensure that Hindus do not have any major central points where there could be their large gathering.

 

9) There are now no Hindus by name in India; it is SC, ST, OBC etc. with their own leaders. The attempt is also being made to see Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists declared as non Hindu’s. While as the Muslims under the banner of Islam is a single group.

 

10) Thus among all these groups Muslims in India are now in majority and you will soon see that the Indian Tricolor is replaced by green Islamic flags and entire India will become an Islamic state.

 

The moment the people of Kashmir hear this, there is a thunderous applause in every mosque. They are encouraged to continue their Islamic movement.

 

What these radical preachers (molvies) say is a historical fact besides the current political situation in India. Every political party appeases Muslims in one form or the other to get their vote which is under the command of these Molvies.

 

It is really an alarming situation for Hindu Dharma and culture which is oldest and richest in the world. There is still time to save the situation and work together against the expanding radical Islam; otherwise it will be too late.

 

Hindus are in deep slumber and ignorant about this expansion of radical Islam and God forbid if attacked through terror they shall not find any shelter.

 

With Regards

B. L. Wali

 

On Islam and Mohammed

From: Govind Rajesh < >

This point needs emphasizing. Despite individual acts of kindness, forbearance and mercy on the part of Muslims, at a group level the religion is unremittingly hostile and destructive of “the other”. All the many centuries of well-documented history of the fate that non-Muslims people, communities and traditions have suffered at the hands of Muslims, straight from the time of Muhammad himself to recent times, including even the bloody partition of India, the irrational “martay dum tak” hostility of Pakistan and relentless terrorist attacks all over the world, all attest to this pattern of perennial hostility and ceaseless, unprovoked aggression. At this collective level forgiveness or acceptance is not found even as an exception. At most some benign secular rulers, like Akbar for e.g. who was never a religious Muslim and eventually apostatized to create his own religion, pact-ised with non-Muslims for pragmatic, political reasons in opposition to or at least ignoring religious theologians and authorities.

The central problem here is that it is not just enough for Islam to grow itself. It seeks actively to displace and replace all other existing religions and traditions. This predatory drive is only found in one other religion, Christianity, and no doubt Islam borrows it from there given that Muhammad developed the religion in an environment where other Arabs were converting to Christianity e.g. Waraqua bin Naufal, the cousin of Muhammad’s first wife Khadija, who reassured the doubtful Muhammad that the spirit that had visited him was the same one that had guided Moses. This man, for example, used to even translated the gospels into Arabic.

One is struck by the fact that instead of creating his own primary holy place of worship Muhammad chose instead to take over that of others and convert it exclusively to his own use. Surely if Muhammad was in direct contact, as is claimed, with the creator of the universe it would have been easy enough to consecrate a new place, in Medina for example, and declare that to be the Qibla. However, initially this designation was applied first to Jerusalem and then later to Mecca. Again, given this apparent flexibility on the part of the Muhammadan god, it does not seem to have been written in stone by him that one place and one place alone was to be the central place for his worship. Still Muhammad-Allah (or, in the language of the Qu’ran, “God and his apostle”) chose to play it like a zero-sum game, setting aside the option, assuming it was even considered, of creating something new without first capturing something that was already being used by someone else. Eventually both the holy sites of Mecca and Jerusalem were taken over from their respective parent traditions and we are today in a situation where even though there is a Jewish state in place the Jews continue to be deprived and shut out of their holiest of holy sites because it now “belongs” to Islam. This is still a portion of their exile that continues to linger despite the Jews’ return to Israel. The case of the Ramjanmabhumi in Ayodhya as well as that of other places of worship razed in order to raise Islamic mosques over them all are instance of the same policy of aggression and take-over.

Contrast this with the policy of the Sikh Gurus who chose to establish the Harmandir Sahib without disturbing or displacing any other peoples or traditions. Even the very thought of attacking and destroying other traditions did not occur to them. It is a sign of the liberality and universality of the Gurus that their followers seek to learn and derive inspiration from all other people and traditions including a religion that has, more than any other force, made their tradition, its Gurus and their followers a target of its religious violence. However, the martial organization of the Sikhs by their gurus also shows that they have not been blind to the grimmer and more sobering reality of this religion. Discovering similarities and commonalities between Mohammedanism and Indian traditions like Sikhism is something that needs to be done more and more. But at the same time it is also true that we ignore the stark distinctions at our (Hindus’ or Sikhs’) own continuing peril.

 

 

Islam’s peaceful way to finish off the West

The peaceful way to finish off the West
http://www.d-intl.com/articles/denmark/2012-10-18/peaceful-way-finish-west

Published 10/18/2012
Maria Celander

Chadi Freigeh, media liason for Hizb ut-Tahrir.

COPENHAGEN. The Islamist party Hizb ut-Tahrir’s annual Scandinavian
conference on October 14 was a resounding success this year. In front
of thousands of enthusiastic onlookers in Denmark and Sweden, a clear
message was conveyed:

“Our goal is for the caliphate to cover the Muslim world, including
Spain,” said “sheikh” Isam Umayrah.

The main venue is Bella Center in Copenhagen, but the conference also
has live satellite links to four other venues in Denmark and one in
Stockholm.  Proceedings are also broadcast live on the Internet.

This rainy afternoon, Bella Center is transformed into a throng of
women in full-length garments and headscarves and bearded men, mostly
young people. A handful of journalists stand out like sore thumbs. Men
and women are kept separate throughout the convention and the women
are placed in the back of the room. However, three of the journalists,
myself included, happen to also be women. Should we sit in the back
with the other women, or in the front row where seats have been
reserved for the journalists?

After some palavering back and forth, we finally get permission to sit
with the men, in the front row. Everything is handled with smiles and
a soft touch. But when the first speaker – Ismail al-Wahwah, born on
The West Bank but currently living in Australia – takes to the stage
the friendly atmosphere evaporates.

Someone in the audience shouts the Muslim battle cry “Takbir!” and the
crowd immediately responds ”Allahu akhbar!” in deafening volume, a
procedure that will be repeated over and over every time a speaker
says something the crowd finds extra palatable.

Ismail al-Wahwah, as well as the other speakers and representatives of
the party, is very open about what they want to achieve.

“The United States of America is our enemy, but we agree on one thing.

They say we want a new world order, and they’re right. It’s time for a
new leadership, and we will make sure it is Islam,” says al-Wahwah.

Secular governments cannot safeguard the interests of Muslims, he
claims. And the same goes for so-called “moderate Muslims”. Leaders
such as Egypt’s Muhammad Mursi and Turkey’s Abdullah Gül are taken to
the cleaners – they are still ”slaves under capitalism”.

“The people who want to find a happy medium are unbelievers and we
have prepared a special punishment for them,” says keynote speaker
“sheikh” Isam Umayrah.

The Shia Muslims of Iran also come in for their share of serious
criticism; they have it wrong, but at least they are Muslims and
hopefully, with a little bit of help they can be made to see the
light, Umayrah philosophizes.

“The Arab Spring is only the beginning, but a very good and
encouraging beginning. And now it’s too late to stop the progression,
signs that the big change is imminent are everywhere,” says Umayrah.

He assures us nothing will be done in secret. The caliphate has to be
located someplace that is easy to defend – Egypt, Turkey, Syria or
Pakistan would be excellent starting points.

“After that, we will try to annex the neighboring countries as soon as
possible. First by means of friendly talks, then on to step two,
three, fyra and so on. No Muslim state except the Caliphate will be
acknowledged,” Umayrah explains.

He also advocates radical, not gradual change and even suggests
gradual change is prohibited in The Quran.

“It is haram (forbidden) to obey any law but that of Islam.”

The party media liaison, the well-spoken and well-dressed Chadi
Freigeh, assures Dispatch International that The West has nothing to
fear from Hizb ut-Tahrir. We can co-exist, he says, but the Muslims
have to follow their own ways.

“We don’t want to impose our laws on the West. Sharia should be
implemented where people want it, and it’s no secret that we have
different values. We have to be honest and admit that all attempts to
integrate the Muslims in the West have failed. That proves we need our
own rules,” says Freigeh.

The Muslims living in the West should follow Shariah as best they can,
but national laws take precedence, he explains. In the long run, the
Caliphate will hopefully be global, but it should be done by peaceful
means. Down the line, everyone will want Shariah since it is a system
that doesn’t discriminate, according to Freigeh.

DI: How do you feel about Al-Qaida?

“I don’t condone actions against civilians, but one should remember
that 9/11 was a reaction to long-term oppression by the United States
against the Muslim world. Oppression has consequences, and now the
U.S. is using 9/11 as an excuse to occupy Afghanistan.”

DI: To what extent and in what way should you perform Jihad?

“Jihad is always presented as something dangerous and terrible in the
Western media, but that is not the case. Jihad protects the Muslims
against threat and oppression. The Americans’ conduct in the Middle
East calls for Jihad, but we need to adhere to certain rules. We don’t
want to behave like the Americans did at Guantánamo for example; it is
against Islam to treat people that way.

“But if we’re threatened, we must of course have a right to defend
ourselves. I’m not Gandhi.”

FACTS/Hizb ut-Tahrir

Hizb ut-Tahrir, “The Freedom Party”, was founded in 1953 in Jerusalem
and is now represented in over 40 countries across the world – among
others, Sweden, Denmark and Great Britain. Even though the party is
illegal in a number of Arab countries and Germany, it has
approximately one million members.

The expressed goal is to create a global Islamic state, a Caliphate,
under Shariah law. Officially, the party advocates non-violent means
as a way to achieve this, but several leading members have been
criticized for using harsh rhetoric against Israel and the United
States.

For instance, supreme leader Ata Abu-Rishta said in 2006 that the Jews
in Israel, the Hindus of Kashmir and the Russians of Chechnya should
be “destroyed”.

A Supreme Court Advocate supports/ recommends Romney

YOGESH SAXENA SUPPORTS CANDIDATURE OF

ROMNEY Much Above To PRESIDENT BARACK

OBAMA IN USA

The West sighed in relief when Rimsha Masih, the 14-year-old Christian girl arrested in Pakistan on August 16 for allegedly burning pages of the Quran, was finally released. Yet the West remains clueless concerning the graphic abuses-including rape and murder-Christian children in Pakistan routinely suffer, simply for being Christian. Consider two stories alone, both of which occurred at the same time Rimsha’s blasphemy ordeal was making headlines around the world.

On August 14, another Christian girl, 12-year-old Muqadas Kainat (which means “Holy Universe”) was ambushed in a field near her home in Sahawil by five Muslim men who “gang raped and murdered” her. At the time, her father was at a hospital visiting her sick mother. He and other family members began a frantic search, until a tip led them to the field where his daughter’s body lay. The postmortem revealed that she had been “gang raped and later strangled to death by five men.” Police, as usual, did not arrest anyone. As a Salem News report puts it, “Complicating matters is the fact that several Christian girls in this remote area have been raped and forced to both marry into the Muslim community and abandon their own religion, human rights groups report…. there is a history in this part of Pakistan according to the Christian community, of local authorities failing to investigate cases of rape or other violence against Christians, often for fear of influential Muslims or militants.”

Similarly, on August 20, an 11-year-old Christian boy, Samuel Yaqoob, went to the markets of Faisalabad to buy food for his family, never to return. According to Wilson Chowdhry, Chairman of the British Pakistani Christian Association, “After extensive searching his body was found near a drain in the Christian colony, bearing marks of horrific torture, with the murder weapon nearby. His nose, lips and belly had been sliced off, and his family could hardly recognize him because the body was so badly burnt. Some 23 wounds by a sharp weapon have been identified in the autopsy. When sending his body for an autopsy, police raised the possibility of sodomy. Parts of Pakistani culture have a strong homosexual pederast culture, and Christian and other minority boys are especially susceptible to rape and abuse because of the powerlessness of their community and their despised status. In one case fairly recently, a Christian boy was kidnapped, raped, tortured and killed by a police officer, his body similarly being dumped in a drain.”

These were just some of the stories concerning the sexual abuse and murder of Pakistan’s Christian children that occurred last August-even as the world stood in awe at the Rimsha Masih blasphemy case. Here are 10 more examples, chosen at random from the many former documented cases:

o   Nisha, a 9-year-old Christian girl was abducted by Muslims, gang-raped, murdered by repeated blows to her head, and then dumped into a canal (May, 2009).

o   Gulfam, another 9-year-old Christian girl, was raped by a Muslim man. Though not killed, she was left “in shock and in the throes of a physical and psychological trauma.” During her ordeal, her rapist told her “not to worry because he had done the same service to other young Christian girls” (December, 2010).

o   Lubna, a 12-year-old Christian girl was kidnapped, gang-raped, and murdered by a group of Muslims (October, 2010).

o   Kidnapped last Christmas Eve, a 12-year-old Christian girl known as “Anna” was gang raped for eight months, forcibly converted and then “married” to her Muslim attacker. After she escaped, instead of seeing justice done, “the Christian family is in hiding from the rapists and the police” (October, 2011).

o   After gang-raping a 13-year-old Christian girl, a band of Muslims came to her house when all male members were away working and “mercilessly” beat her pregnant aunt causing her to lose female twins to miscarriage: “They murdered our children, they raped our daughter. We have nothing left with us,” lamented an older family member. The police went on to accuse the 13-year-old raped girl of “committing adultery with three men” (June, 2012).

o   A Muslim man murdered a teenage Christian girl, Amariah, during an attempted rape: he had “grabbed the girl and, under the threat of a gun, tried to drag her away. The young woman resisted, trying to escape the clutches of her attacker, when the man opened fire and killed her instantly, and later tried to conceal the corpse” (December, 2011).

o   Muslims abducted a 14-year-old Christian girl, Mehek, at gunpoint in broad daylight from her parents’ house. One of her abductors declared he would “purify her” by making her “Muslim and my mistress” (August, 2011).

o   Shazia, a 12-year-old Christian girl, was enslaved, raped, and murdered by Chaudhry Naeem, a rich Muslim lawyer, who was acquitted. His wife and son had participated in abusing the child (November, 2010).

o   Nadia, a Christian girl who was abducted in 2001 when she was 15-years-old and forced to marry a Muslim, only recently returned to her Catholic family (January, 2012).

o   A powerful Muslim businessman had two Christian sisters kidnapped, forced to convert to Islam, and “married” to him (May, 2011).

In every one of these cases, Pakistani police either failed to act or sided with the rapists and murderers.

The anecdotes represent a mere sampling of the documented atrocities committed against the children of Pakistan’s Christians, who amount for a miniscule 1.5% of the nation’s population. Then there are the stories that never make it to any media-stories of silent abuse that only the nameless, faceless victims know. For example, it took five years for the story of a 2-year-old toddler who was savagely raped because her Christian father refused to convert to Islam to surface. After undergoing five surgeries, her anatomy remains disfigured and she suffers from several permanent complications. Her family lives in fear and hiding.

How many Christian children in Pakistan are being mauled in silence, with their stories never surfacing?

And what animates this savagery? Discussing the aforementioned rape of 9-year-old Gulfam, local sources in Pakistan put it well: “It is shameful. Such incidents occur frequently. Christian girls are considered goods to be damaged at leisure. Abusing them is a right. According to the [Muslim] community’s mentality it is not even a crime. Muslims regard them as spoils of war.”

Indeed, here is how the late Majid Khadduri, “internationally recognized as one of the world’s leading authorities on Islamic law and jurisprudence,” explained the idea of human “spoils” in his War and Peace in the Law of Islam:

The term spoil (ghanima) is applied specifically to property acquired by force from non-Muslims. It includes, however, not only property (movable and immovable) but also persons, whether in the capacity of asra (prisoners of war) or sabi (women and children). … If the slave were a woman, the master was permitted to have sexual connection with her as a concubine.

From here, one can begin to understand the rabid fanaticism that possessed Pakistan’s Muslims concerning the Rifsha blasphemy case, which resulted in mass riots, Muslim threats to take the law in their own hands, and the dislocation of Christians, some of whom have been forced to live and worship in the wilderness: if infidel Christians, especially their children, are seen as mere “spoils” to be used and disposed of with impunity, certainly it must be intolerable for Muslims if one of these “sub-humans” dares to desecrate Islam’s holy book-the same book that ordains their inhuman status.

And herein is the true significance of the Rifsha Masih case: success can be measured not in the fact that this one particular Christian child got away from the savageries of Islamic law and culture, but whether her ordeal will begin to open Western eyes to the terrors Pakistan’s Christian children routinely face.

—
Yogesh Kumar Saxena

Advocate Supreme Court

Creation of Bosnian Muslim State Led to Ethnic Cleansing of 440,000 Catholics

From: Vinay Joshi < >
Subject: Creation of Bosnian Muslim State Led to Ethnic Cleansing of 440,000 Catholics

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/creation-of-bosnian-muslim-state-led-to-ethnic-cleansing-of-440000-catholics/

 

October 14, 2012

Print This Post

In the late 90s the trendy thing to do was to agonize over the fate of Bosnian Muslims and all the terrible horrors that the Poor Muslims (TM) were experiencing in Sarajevo. Ethnic cleansing was the word of the day and the Serbs were the new villains of the hour.

Steven Spielberg even managed to make the ultimate liberal thriller, The Peacemaker, starring  George Clooney racing against the clock to stop a Serb terrorist from launching a nuclear attack on New York City. (This proved to be a very timely film to make in 1997. Four years before Muslim terrorists (Shhh they don’t exist) launched a real attack against New York)

 

NATO carved out a Bosnian Muslim state by bombing a bunch of Serbian Christians, civilians and non-civilians, Billy Clinton didn’t really care. And ethnic cleansing became an actual thing… just not ethnic cleansing of Muslims. Mohammed’s last command to his followers was to drive the Jews and Christians out of Arabia. And as Muslims have expanded their reach, they have religiously been keeping their unholy prophet’s command.

 

Christians are massively leaving post-war Bosnia-Herzegovina amid mounting discrimination and Islamization, according to a new report released Friday, October 12.

 

There are just 440,000 Catholics left in the Balkan nation, half the prewar figure, the group said.

Puljic (Public?) reportedly complained that while dozens of mosques were build in the Bosnian capital Sarajevo, no building permissions were given for Christian churches.

 

“The cardinal already waits 13 years on permission to build just a small church,” Church in Need said.  Authorities so far refused to return hundreds of nationalized church buildings, despite a ruling by the European Court of Human Rights to do so, according to Christian officials.

But that is what you get when you create another “moderate” Muslim state. Muslims may demand the right to build mega-mosques in London, Tennessee and right next to Ground Zero, but they don’t reciprocate. Islam has no notion of human rights… only Muslim rights.  Or rather the rights of Muslim men over all sorts of inferior types like women and non-Muslims. Create a Muslim state and you get discrimination against non-Muslims. It’s how the religion works.

In published remarks, Van Rompuy made clear that giving Bosnia-Herzegovina a “European perspective”, the code word for eventual European Union membership, “is the only way to overcome the crisis”.

How has the European perspective worked out for the millions of Muslims in France, Germany and the UK?

Are Muslims getting a European Perspective or are Europeans getting a Muslim Perspective?

Some notes on Muhammad

From: sri venkat < >

Some notes on Muhammad

The references below are from original Muslims’ sources.

 

source: http://www.4truth.net/fourtruthpbworld.aspx?pageid=8589953043

 

“Although Muhammad patiently endured persecution in Mecca, his attitude quickly changed when his numbers grew in Medina. Soon he would tolerate no criticism whatsoever. According to our earliest biographical source, a man named Abu Afak—who was more than a hundred years old—wrote a poem criticizing people for converting to Islam. Muhammad demanded he be killed, and Abu Afak was murdered in his sleep. When a woman named Asma heard that Muslims had killed such an elderly man, she wrote a poem calling for people to take a stand against Islam.Ibn Ishaq relates what happened next:

 

When the apostle heard what she had said he said, “Who will rid me of Marwan’s daughter?” Umayr bin Adiy al-Khatmi who was with him heard him, and that very night he went to her house and killed her. In the morning he came to the apostle and told him what he had done and he said, “You have helped God and His apostle, O Umayr!” When he asked if he would have to bear any evil consequences the apostle said, “Two goats won’t butt their heads about her,” so Umayr went back to his people.v

 

Muhammad’s violence was directed towards groups as well. Muhammad once said to his followers, “I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslims.” The Jews of Qurayza resisted Muhammad and attempted to form an alliance against him. When the alliance faltered, Muhammad acted quickly. His armies surrounded them and “besieged them for twenty-five nights until they were sore pressed and God cast terror into their hearts.”

 

Then they surrendered, and the apostle confined them in Medina. . . . Then the apostle went out to the market of Medina (which is still its market today) and dug trenches in it. Then he sent for them and struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out to him in batches. . . . There were 600 or 700 in all, though some put the figure as high as 800 or 900.vii

 

Every male who had reached puberty was killed. Muhammad divided the women, children, and property among his men (taking a fifth of the spoils for himself).

 

V. MUHAMMAD: THE UGLY

 

But things get worse.As the Muslim armies raided town after town, they captured many women, who would often be sold or traded. Yet, since the Muslim men were a long way from their wives, they needed wisdom from Allah to guide them in their treatment of their female captives. It wasn’t long before Muhammad received a revelation allowing the soldiers to sleep with the women:

 

Allah’s Messenger sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them. Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions of Allah’s Messenger seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women because of their husbands being polytheists. Then Allah, Most High, sent down regarding that: “And women already married, except those whom your right hands possess (iv. 24)” (i.e. they were lawful for them when their ‘Idda period came to an end).viii

 

This verse of the Qur’an (4:24), along with others (23:1-6; 33:50; 70:22-30), granted Muslims the right to have sex with their female captives and slave girls, even those who were still married or who were going to be sold or traded.

 

Perhaps most disturbing of all is the fact that Muslims could have sex with girls who hadn’t even reached puberty. The opening verses of Chapter 65 of the Qur’an present Islamic rules for divorce. According to 65:4, if a Muslim divorces a girl who hasn’t yet reached puberty, he must wait three months to make sure she isn’t pregnant.

 

Muhammad himself had sex with a prepubescent girl. His courtship of Aisha began when she was only six years old.ix Muhammad had a dream about her, which led him to believe that God wanted him to marry the young girl.x Fortunately, Muhammad waited three years before having sex with her; nevertheless, Muslim sources report that Aisha still hadn’t reached puberty.xi Since Muhammad is the moral exemplar in Islam, his actions are still affecting young girls today.”

 

iIbn Ishaq, Sirat Rasul Allah (The Life of Muhammad), A. Guillaume, tr. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1980), p. 106.

ii See, e.g., Qur’an 109.

iii M. H. Shakir Translation.

iv Ibn Ishaq, p. 596.

v Ibid., p. 676.

vi Sahih Muslim 4366.

vii Ibn Ishaq, p. 464.

viii Sahih Muslim 3432.

ix Sahih Al-Bukhari 3894.

x Ibid., Number 3895.

xi See Sahih al-Bukhari 5236 and 6130.