See a PDF at:
bhartiya musalmanon – How Islam was forced on Hindus in India
Category: Hindus’ History
From: MahanDeshBharat, swarnimrashtra@gmail.com
आसाम को वृहद इस्लामी राज्य बनाने की साजिश
आसाम में क्यों लगी आग?
– अश्वनी कुमार
प्रधानमंत्री मनमोहन सिंह जिस राज्य का संसद में प्रतिनिधित्व करते हैं उस राज्य में हिंसा का तांडव जारी है, 41 से अधिक मौतें और अपने ही देश में डेढ़ लाख लोगों का शरणार्थी हो जाना कोई मामूली बात नहीं। अपनी रहने की जगह पर अधिकार जताने से किसी को रोकने से अजीब बात कोई और नहीं होती। अपनी ही जगह पर ताकत से नहीं बल्कि वोट बैंक की राजनीति के कारण शत्रुतापूर्ण बाहरी लोगों की लगातार घुसपैठ तो राष्ट्र की अवधारणा के ही विपरीत है। एक धर्मनिरपेक्ष लोकतंत्र में यह काम अधिक आसानी से हो सकता है। देश के तथाकथित धर्मनिरपेक्ष लोकतंत्र शासकों की नीतियों के चलते आक्रामक समुदाय के लिए यह वरदान सिद्ध है, जिसका मकसद पूरी तरह कुत्सित और निरंकुश होता है। इससे भारतीयों की अपनी जीने की जगह को अवैध बंगलादेशी समुदाय को जीने की जगह में बदलने में वैधता मिल जाती है। आज असमिया समाज और अवैध बंगलादेशी घुसपैठिये सीधे संघर्ष की स्थिति में पहुंच चुके हैं। इसके लिए जिम्मेदार और कोई नहीं बल्कि जिम्मेदार है कांग्रेस। कांग्रेस ने राष्ट्रीय हितों और राष्ट्रीय सुरक्षा की कीमत पर बंगलादेशी घुसपैठियों को अपना वोट बैंक बनाने की साजिश की। 20 वर्ष से भी अधिक समय से असमिया पहचान तय करने के एकमात्र कानून के रूप में आईएम (डीटी) एक्ट का लागू रहना इस बात का प्रमाण है कि धर्मनिरपेक्षता और अल्पसंख्यकों की सुरक्षा के नाम पर कांग्रेस पार्टी किस हद तक चली गई। वर्तमान में हो रही हिंसा आने वाले खतरे का संकेत दे रही है क्योंकि इसके पीछे वजह है बंगलादेश से अवैध घुसपैठ। केन्द्र सरकार कितना भी इंकार करे लेकिन हिंसा के पीछे अवैध घुसपैठियों की भूमिका को नकारा नहीं जा सकता।
असम में तनाव कोई एक दिन में नहीं फैला। बोडो और गैर बोडो समुदाय के बीच पिछले कई महीनों से तनाव की स्थिति बनी हुई है। इस तनाव का कारण था स्वायत्तशासी बीटीसी में रहने वाले गैर बोडो समुदायों का खुलकर बोडो समुदायों द्वारा की जाने वाली अलग बोडोलैंड राज्य की मांग के विरोध में आ जाना। गैर बोडो समुदायों के दो संगठन गैर बोडो सुरक्षा मंच और अखिल बोडोलैंड मुस्लिम छात्र संघ अलग बोडोलैंड की मांग के विरुद्ध सक्रिय हैं। दोनों ही संगठनों में अवैध रूप से आए बंगलादेशी घुसपैठिये मुस्लिम समुदाय के कार्यकर्ता के रूप में सक्रिय हैं। इससे तनाव तो बन ही रहा था, जिसकी प्रतिक्रिया कोकराझार जैसे बोडो बहुल इलाकों में हो रही थी।
दोनों संगठन बीटीसी इलाके के जिन गांवों में बोडो समुदाय की आबादी आधी से कम है उन गांवों को बीटीसी से बाहर करने की मांग कर रहे हैं जबकि बोडो आबादी अलग राज्य की मांग कर ही रही है। ऐसा पहली बार हुआ है कि जब गैर जनजातीय समुदाय खुले रूप से स्थानीय जनजातीय आबादी के विरुद्ध सीधे टकराव पर उतर आए हैं।
बंगलादेश की सीमा से सटा धुबरी जिला बड़ी समस्या बन चुका है। इस जिले में लगातार घुसपैठ हो रही है। 2011 की जनगणना में यह जिला मुस्लिम बहुल हो चुका है। 1991-2001 के बीच असम में मुस्लिमों का अनुपात 15.03 प्रतिशत से बढक़र 30.92 प्रतिशत हो गया है। इस दशक में असम के बोगाईगांव,कोकराझार, बरपेटा और कछार के करीमगंज और हाईलाकड़ी में मुस्लिमों की आबादी बढ़ी है। मुस्लिम आबादी 2001 से अब तक कितनी बढ़ी होगी इसका अनुमान लगाया जा सकता है। आज स्थिति यह है कि राज्य की जनसंख्या का स्वरूप बदल चुका है और अवैध घुसपैठिये असम के मूल वनवासियों, जनजातियों की हत्याएं कर रहे हैं, उनके घर जलाए जा रहे हैं, उनको अपनी ही जमीन से बेदखल किया जा रहा है।सरकार के संरक्षण में भारत के नागरिक बन बैठे घुसपैठिये भारत के मूल नागरिकों का ही नरसंहार कर रहे हैं। बंगलादेशी कट्टरपंथियों, घुसपैठियों अैर आतंकवादी संगठनों की बदौलत एक वृहद इस्लामी राज्य की ओर कदम बढ़ा रहे हैं। असम के मूल नागरिकों को बंगलादेश के हिन्दुओं की तरह से ही दोयम दर्जे का नागरिक बनाने का षड्यंत्र आकार ले चुका है। अवैध बंगलादेशी घुसपैठियों को देश से बाहर करने की राष्ट्रवादी मांग को साम्प्रदायिक कर देने की कुत्सित राजनीति आज भी चरम पर है। असम और दिल्ली में बैठे धर्मनिरपेक्षता के झंडाबरदारो सम्भल जाओ, स्थिति की गम्भीरता को समझो, मातृभूमि की रक्षा का संकल्प करो वरना यह राष्ट्र तुम्हें कभी माफ नहीं करेगा।
पंजाब केसरी संपादकीय 27 जुलाई 2012
The Cause of India’s Partition in 1947 was Islam not Brithish
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Arjun wrote:
Dr Koenraad Elst exploding the great myth of the British being responsible for Partition of India and to why Hindus should face the historical reality of the truth…more
—Islam is anti-Vedic. Islam is not tolerant of any other faith. Islam has invaded in India by force, and it does not belong there, has no right to be there. India is the land of Hindus, and Hindus need to make India a Hindu state. The Hindu dharma and culture is tolerant of all the tolerant faiths. Therefore, Hindu dharma is inherently secular. India does not need the current so called secularism which is the European medicine against Christianity.– Skanda987
JAWANS BETRAYED BY NEHRU
JAWANS BETRAYED BY NEHRU
If we look back (some of us still can!) to 1947 we shall discover the horrendous truth that Nehru loved the Muslims but hated the Hindus.
It was on that basis alone that he accepted Partition without imposing a single condition on the enemy. Nehru was neither bothered about the territorial integrity of India nor about the safety of Hindus and Sikhs who were going to be slaughtered by the Muslims. In fact, Nehru signed the Document of Surrender of India (Partition) so nonchalantly that beggars belief.
He ought to have realized the implications of one-sided collapse and surrender and discussed these with colleagues or Hindu leaders. After the Noakhali massacre in August 1946 and the Rawalpindi massacres in March 1947 he ought to have known the fate of the Hindus that would be trapped under the bloodthirsty “Sword of Mohammed of Mecca”.
What safeguards did he demand from his former friend and colleague Mohammed Ali Jinnah for the safety of our people who were going to live on the other side of the devil’s (lethal) divide?
It’s a great pity that when it comes to recording those accounts of treatment of Hindus at the hands of our former fellow citizens the Hindus are no match to the brave Jews who have done tremendous hard work and painstaking research to record the name of each and every one who perished in the concentration camps set up by the NAZIS. The government of India is callous with regard to Hindu lives and dignity just like the alienated Nehru and his offspring.
However, sometimes by some good chance one does get a peep into those days. Among millions of heart rending and hair raising accounts of the families escaping death we have one more.
This is about the life of a British officer, late Lt Gen Stanley Menezes. It gives us a unique insight into how our betrayed Bharat suddenly became “Hell for Hindus”.
Lt Gen Stanley Menezes was one of the few remaining British officers who served in the Indian Army before and after Partition.
In August 1947 he was caught up in fighting (Yes, FIGHTING against the “misguided children” of Bapu Gandhi!) on the North West Frontier immediately after the (ILLEGITIMATE) birth of Pakistan.
As the Army was being divided up between India and Pakistan, some units found themselves on the wrong side of the hastily drawn border.
The 3rd Battalion Indian Grenadiers was caught at Thal Fort in the Kurram Valley. The Commander-in-Chief of the newly formed Pakistan Army, General Sir Frank Messervy, believed that it would be safe to bring the battalion to India by train, but on reaching the Usterzai Defile, the line was found to be blocked with boulders which had been rolled down the hill by hostile local tribesmen.
Firing began with rifles and machine guns, decapitating soldiers in the train compartments, while the train crew fled for shelter. After two hours Menezes, then an acting major, managed to get the boulders removed from the track and persuade the crew to return; the train limped into Kohat railway station.
Twenty-six men had been killed in the attack, and many wounded, including the commanding officer. Menezes took command and after a precarious journey of almost seven weeks, brought the remaining men safely to India.
This is the account of our ill-fated country and an ill-fated train, full of armed combatant soldiers, who suffered heavy loss of life while escaping the “devils” who had all been Indian citizens until a few weeks before. Our brave Jawans, who had fought the German and the Japanese crack troops without a cease fire in World War 2, became “sitting ducks” for these Mohammedans.
Spare a thought for the unarmed civilians, millions of them, who had no weapons to defend themselves, no armed guard, or the safety of a train, but had to walk countless miles in the burning sun of July and August when the killings were at their maximum, exposed to attacks and night raids all along the way, many losing lives, belongings and daughters, wives and sisters who remain unaccounted for.
How can a country claiming ancient civilization keep quiet about those millions of innocent Hindus, men, women and children, sick and old, who were never on the mind of Nehru, the Prime Minister, and how can a nation honor such a despicable traitor by naming a university after him and erecting his statues all over? This beggars belief.
To compound the misfortune and tragedy, the Hindu nation even adored his daughter and grandson to the extent that they became prime ministers, too, as if by divine right as in Medieval Age.
The conclusion must be drawn that the Hindus are still too ignorant, intimidated, brainwashed and frightened to demand post mortem of Partition and account for each and every person killed by the barbarians. What is the quality of India’s Parliament (Lok Sabha) that seems more concerned with the safety and wellbeing of Sonia Maino than the betrayed Hindus?
The nation must not rest till an enquiry is held into the conduct and patriotism of JL Nehru, the traitor, who signed the surrender of one third of India and consigned millions of Hindus to death or destruction. Will we, one day, see the name “Nehru” as UNMENTIONABLE in Broken Bharat (Partitioned Indian Secular State) as “JAI CHAND”, or as “Hitler” in Germany?
On that day the Hindus will have come of age by acquiring TERRITORIAL sense as well as the ability to discriminate between Friend and FOE.
Now where is the memorial to those martyred Jawans where the nation could go and pay homage instead of gathering at the so-called “Raj Ghat” on January 30th, and the “Bofors Chor Samadhi” on May 21st., to make a FOOL of themselves?
Kuru
rashtra1947@aol.com
July 13, 2012.
==================
जो कौम इतिहास से नही सीखती …
From: LightofTruth OM returntovedasom@gmail.com
जो कौम इतिहास से नही सीखती
वो बर्बाद होकर मिट्टी मे मिल जाती है |
जो हिंदू इस घमंड मे जी रहे है कि अरबो सालो से सनातन धर्म है और इसे कोई नही मिटा सकता मै उन्हें मुर्ख और बेवकूफ ही समझता हूँ |
आखिर अफगानीस्तान से हिंदू क्यों मिट गया ?
काबुल जो भगवान राम के पुत्र कुश का बनाया शहर था आज वहाँ एक भी मंदिर नही बचा| गंधार जिसका विवरण महाभारत मे है जहां की रानी गांधारी थी आज उसका नाम कंधार हो चूका है… और वहाँ आज एक भी हिंदू नही बचा |
कम्बोडिया जहां राजा सूर्य देव बर्मन ने दुनिया का सबसे बड़ा मंदिर अंकोरवाट बनाया आज वहा भी हिंदू नही है |बाली द्वीप मे २० साल पहले तक ९०% हिंदू थे आज सिर्फ २०% बचे |कश्मीर घाटी मे सिर्फ २० साल पहले ५०% हिंदू थे , आज एक भी हिंदू नही बचा |
केरल मे १० साल पहले तक ६०% जनसंख्या हिन्दुओ की थी आज सिर्फ १०% हिंदू केरल मे है |
नोर्थ ईस्ट जैसे सिक्किम, नागालैंड , आसाम आदि मे हिंदू हर रोज मारे या भगाए जाते है या उनका धर्मपरिवर्तन हो रहा है |
मित्रों, १५६९ तक ईरान का नाम पारस या पर्शिया होता था और वहाँ एक भी मुस्लिम नही था सिर्फ पारसी रहते थे .. जब पारसी पर मुस्लिमो का आक्रमण होता था तब पारसी बूढ़े बुजुर्ग अपने नौजवान को यही सिखाते थे की हमे कोई मिटा नही सकता .
लेकिन ईरान से सारे के सारे पारसी मिटा दिये गए .. धीरे धीरे उनका कत्लेआम और धर्मपरिवर्तन होता रहा .. एक नाव मे बैठकर २१ पारसी किसी तरह गुजरात के नवसारी जिले के उद्वावाडा गांव मे पहुचे और आज पारसी सिर्फ भारत मे ही गिनती की संख्या मे बचे है | (Now there are only 60,000 Parsis in the world. – Skanda987)
कांग्रेस के लोग कृपा करके सोनिया गाँधी को समझाये की वो विभाजन काल की ग़लती को ना दुहराएँ. जो इतिहास से कुछ सीखता नही वो मिट जाता है.
सूरहावर्दी ने 1946 मे कलकत्ता मे हिंदुओं का क़त्ले आम करने के लिए 24 मे से 22 पुलिस थाने मुस्लिम अधिकारीओं और 2 अन्ग्लो इंडियन अधिकारीओं के हवाले किया था यही हाल पूरे बंगाल का था. हमारे केंद्रीय गृह सचिव यदि किसी महा भयंकर षड्यंत्र को नही समझते तो उन्हे पद पर बना रहने का अधिकार नही है.
26/11 के पाकिस्तानी हमले के समय कौन था मुंबई का पुलिस सर्वोच्च अधिकारी, और कहाँ बैठा था, क्या कर रहा था ? ज़रा सोचिए गंभीरता से. इसकी भयानकता के बारे मे अंदाज लगाना ही है तो इस देश की देशभक्त जनता पर उपकार करने के लिए श्री माधव गोड़बोले आइ ए एस भू. पु. केंद्रीय गृह सचिव की लिखित “दी हॉलोकास्ट ऑफ इंडियन पार्टीशन: एन इंक्वेस्ट” यह किताब पूरी संजीदगी से पढ़ें जिसमे एक भी शब्द बिना आधार के काल्पनिक नही लिखा गया;
आप आज उसी पद पर हैं. यह आदेश जारी करके हिंदुओं के भावी क़त्ले आम की सुविधा कर रहे हैं
==
What Harm Gandhi Did to India
From: Koti Shreekrishna, tatachar@aol.com
Subject: What Harm Gandhi Did to India
Arun: I would like to know what harm was done to India by Gandhi.
Gandhi is the architect of HALF-baked partition. He tried to block partition that was good. When he failed to do so (which is not his fault) as Jinnah and Nehru could not be made to compromise, Gandhi went on to commit the greatest BLUNDER by insisting on half-baked partition. He also ignored the injunction of Qur’an, which calls upon Muslims to create a pure Islamic society. It is Gandhi who is responsible for getting millions of non-Muslims stuck in an Islamic state [W. Pakistan was left with about 25% non-Muslims and East Pakistan was left with about 45% non-Muslims]. What a nightmare! Millions of non-Muslims have suffered in Pakistan in various ways. Today Pakistan has less than 5% non-Muslims living under Islamic sword. In Bangladesh, it is about 25% non-Muslims (down from 45% in 1947) who can be raped and murdered any time. They are basically at the mercy of Muslims. India was left with about 15% Muslims in 1947 (with special protection under our pseudo-secular constitution, getting more so from time to time), and that % is about the same today. Muslims in tilting majority in many constituencies in India call more shots in India than any other group; and our policies are meant to protect, enrich and enhance pseudo-secularism. Gandhi’s double standard (he even asked Muslims to kill as many Hindus as they would like) is the father of pseudo-secularism as well.
कश्मीर का खुनी इतिहास
From: LightofTruth returntovedasom@gmail.com
Subject: कश्मीर का खुनी इतिहास
मित्रो, आपको हम एक ऐसी दर्दनाक सच्चाई बताने जा रहे है। जो देश के 99% से ज्यादा लोगो को पता नहीं है। आप सभी ने सुना होगा कश्मीरी पंडितो के बारे में। हम सभी ने सुना है की हा कुछ तो हुआ था कश्मीरी पंडितो के साथ। लेकिन क्या हुआ था क्यों हुआ था यह ठीक से पता नहीं है। हम आपको वह बात विस्तार में बताने जा रहे है की क्या हुआ था कश्मीर में और क्या हुआ था कश्मीरी पंडितो के साथ।
पार्ट 1: कश्मीर का खुनी इतिहास
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
कश्मीर का नाम कश्यप ऋषि के नाम पर पड़ा था। कश्मीर के मूल निवासी सारे हिन्दू थे। कश्मीरी पंडितो की संस्कृति 5000 साल पुरानी है और वो कश्मीर के मूल निवासी हैं। इसलिए अगर कोई कहता है की भारत ने कश्मीर पर कब्ज़ा कर लिया है यह बिलकुल गलत है। 14वीं शताब्दी में तुर्किस्तान से आये एक क्रूर आतंकी मुस्लिम दुलुचा ने 60,000 लोगो की सेना के साथ कश्मीर में आक्रमण किया और कश्मीर में मुस्लिम साम्राज्य की स्थापना की। दुलुचा ने नगरों और गाँव को नष्ट कर दिया और हजारों हिन्दुओ का नरसंघार किया। बहुत सारे हिन्दुओ को जबरदस्ती मुस्लिम बनाया गया। बहुत सारे हिन्दुओ ने जो इस्लाम नहीं कबूल करना चाहते थे, उन्होंने जहर खाकर आत्महत्या कर ली और बाकि भाग गए या क़त्ल कर दिए गए या इस्लाम कबूल करवा लिए गए। आज जो भी कश्मीरी मुस्लिम है उन सभी के पूर्वजो को इन अत्याचारों के कारण जबरदस्ती मुस्लिम बनाया गया था।
भारत पर मुस्लिम आक्रमण अतिक्रमण – विश्व इतिहास का सबसे ज्यादा खुनी कहानी:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMY2YV9WucY
भारत के खुनी विभाजन के बारे में जानने के लिए यह विडियो देखे:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGiTaQ60Je0
अधिक जानकारी के लिए इस लिंक को देखे:
http://kasmiripandits.blogspot.com/2012/04/tragic-history-of-kasmir.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kashmir#Muslim_rule
पार्ट 2: 1947 के समय कश्मीर
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1947 में ब्रिटिश संसद के “इंडियन इंडीपेनडेंस इ एक्ट” के अनुसार ब्रिटेन ने तय किया की मुस्लिम बहुल क्षेत्रों को पाकिस्तान बनाया जायेगा। 150 राजाओं ने पाकिस्तान चुना और बाकी 450 राजाओ ने भारत। केवल एक जम्मू और कश्मीर के राजा बच गए थे जो फैसला नहीं कर पा रहे थे। लेकिन जब पाकिस्तान ने फौज भेजकर कश्मीर पर आक्रमण किया तो कश्मीर के राजा ने भी हिंदुस्तान में कश्मीर के विलय के लिए दस्तख़त कर दिए। ब्रिटिशो ने यह कहा था की राजा अगर एक बार दस्तखत कर दिया तो वो बदल नहीं सकता और जनता की आम राय पूछने की जरुरत नहीं है। तो जिन कानूनों के आधार पर भारत और पाकिस्तान बने थे उन नियमो के अनुसार कश्मीर पूरी तरह से भारत का अंग बन गया था। इसलिए कोई भी कहता है की कश्मीर पर भारत ने जबरदस्ती कब्ज़ा कर रहे है वो बिलकुल झूठ है।
अधिक जानकारी के लिए यह विडियो आप देख सकते है:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxhVDKRFh28
पार्ट 3: सितम्बर 14, 1989
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
बीजेपी के राष्ट्रीय कार्यकारणी के सदस्य और जाने माने वकील कश्मीरी पंडित तिलक लाल तप्लू का JKLF ने क़त्ल कर दिया। उसके बाद जस्टिस नील कान्त गंजू को गोली मार दिया गया। सारे कश्मीरी नेताओ की हत्या एक एक करके कर दी गयी। उसके बाद 300 से ज्यादा हिन्दू महिलाओ और पुरुषो की निर्संश हत्या की गयी। कश्मीरी पंडित नर्स जो श्रीनगर के सौर मेडिकल कॉलेज अस्पताल में काम करती थी, का सामूहिक बलात्कार किया गया और मार मार कर उसकी हत्या कर दी गयी। यह खुनी खेल चलता रहा और अपने सेकुलर राज्य और केंद्र सरकार, मीडिया ने कुछ भी नहीं किया।
पार्ट ४: जनवरी 4, 1990
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
आफताब, एक स्थानीय उर्दू अखबार ने हिज्ब -उल -मुजाहिदीन की तरफ से एक प्रेस विज्ञप्ति जारी की, सभी हिन्दू अपना सामन पैक करें और कश्मीर छोड़ कर चले जाएँ। एक अन्य स्थानीय समाचार पत्र, अल सफा ने इस निष्कासन आदेश को दोहराया। मस्जिदों में भारत और हिन्दू विरोधी भाषण दिए जाने लगे। सभी कश्मीरी हिन्दू/मुस्लिमो को कहा गया की इस्लामिक ड्रेस कोड अपनाये। सिनेमा और विडियो पार्लर वगैरह बंद कर दिए गए। लोगो को मजबूर किया गया की वो अपनी घड़ी पाकिस्तान के समय के अनुसार करे लें।
अधिक जानकारी के लिए यह लिंक और ब्लॉग आप देख सकते है:
http://kasmiripandits.blogspot.com/2012/04/when-kashmiri-pandits-fled-islamic.html
http://www.rediff.com/news/2005/jan/19kanch.htm – [19/01/90: When Kashmiri Pandits fled Islamic terror]
पार्ट 5: जनवरी 19, 1990
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
सारे कश्मीरी पंडितो के घर के दरवाजो पर नोट लगा दिया जिसमे लिखा था “या तो मुस्लिम बन जाओ या कश्मीर छोड़ कर भाग जाओ या फिर मरने के लिए तैयार हो जाओ”। पाकिस्तान की तत्कालीन प्रधानमंत्री बेनजीर भुट्टो ने टीवी पर कश्मीरी मुस्लिमो को भारत से आजादी के लिए भड़काना शुरू कर दिया। सारे कश्मीर के मस्जिदों में एक टेप चलाया गया। जिसमे मुस्लिमो को कहा गया की वो हिन्दुओ को कश्मीर से निकाल बाहर करें। उसके बाद सारे कश्मीरी मुस्लिम सडको पर उतर आये। उन्होंने कश्मीरी पंडितो के घरो को जला दिया, कश्मीर पंडित महिलाओ का बलात्कार करके, फिर उनकी हत्या करके उनके नग्न शरीर को पेड़ पर लटका दिया गया। कुछ महिलाओ को जिन्दा जला दिया गया और बाकियों को लोहे के गरम सलाखों से मार दिया गया। बच्चो को स्टील के तार से गला घोटकर मार दिया गया। कश्मीरी महिलाये ऊंचे मकानों की छतो से कूद कूद कर जान देने लगी। कश्मीरी मुस्लिम, कश्मीरी हिन्दुओ के हत्या करते चले गए और नारा लगते चले गए की उन पर अत्याचार हुआ है और उनको भारत से आजादी चाहिए।
पार्ट 6: कश्मीरी पंडितो का पलायन
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
3,50,000 कश्मीरी पंडित अपनी जान बचा कर कश्मीर से भाग गए। कश्मीरी पंडित जो कश्मीर के मूल निवासी है उन्हें कश्मीर छोड़ना पड़ा और तब कश्मीरी मुस्लिम कहते है की उन्हें आजादी चाहिए। यह सब कुछ चलता रहा लेकिन सेकुलर मीडिया चुप रही उन्होंने देश के लोगो तक यह बात कभी नहीं पहुचाई इसलिए देश के लोगो को आज तक नहीं पता चल पाया की क्या हुआ था कश्मीर में। देश- विदेश के लेखक चुप रहे, भारत का संसद चुप रहा, देश के सारे हिन्दू, मुस्लिम, सेकुलर चुप रहे। किसी ने भी 3,50,000 कश्मीरी पंडितो के बारे में कुछ नहीं कहा। आज भी अपने देश के मीडिया 2002 के दंगो के रिपोर्टिंग में व्यस्त है। वो कहते है की गुजरात में मुस्लिम विरोधी दंगे हुए थे लेकिन यह कभी नहीं बताते की 750 मुस्लिमों के साथ साथ 250 हिन्दू भी मरे थे और यह भी कभी नहीं बताते की दंगो की शुरुआत मुस्लिमो ने की थी, जब उन्होंने 59 हिन्दुओं को ट्रेन में गोधरा में जिन्दा जला दिया था। हिन्दुओं पर अत्याचार के बात की रिपोर्टिंग से कहते है की अशांति फैलेगी, लेकिन मुस्लिमो पर हुए अत्याचार की रिपोर्टिंग से अशांति नहीं फैलती। इसे कहते है सेकुलर (धर्मनिरपेक्ष) पत्रकारिता।
http://kashmiris-in-exile.blogspot.com/2009/01/19-years-to-19th-day-of-1990-exodus-of.html
पार्ट 7: कश्मीरी पंडितो के आज की स्थिति
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
आज 4.5 लाख कश्मीरी पंडित अपने देश में ही रेफूजी की तरह रह रहे है। पूरे देश या विदेश में कोई भी नहीं है उनको देखने वाला। कोई भी मीडिया नहीं है जो उनके बारे में हुए अत्याचार को बताये। कोई भी सरकार या पार्टी या संस्था नहीं है जो की विस्थापित कश्मीरियों को उनके पूर्वजों के भूमि में वापस ले जाने को तैयार है। कोई भी नहीं इस इस दुनिया में जो कश्मीरी पंडितो के लिए “न्याय” की मांग करे। कश्मीरी पंडित काफी पढ़े लिखे लोगो के तरह जाने जाते थे, आज वो भिखारियों के तरह पिछले 22 सालो से टेंट में रह रहे है। उन्हें मुलभुत सुविधाए भी नहीं मिल पा रही है, पीने के लिए पानी तक की समस्या है। भारतीय और विश्व की मीडिया, मानवाधिकार संस्थाए गुजरात दंगो में मरे 750 मुस्लिमो (310 मारे गए हिन्दुओ को भूलकर) की बात करते है। लेकिन यहाँ तो कश्मीरी पंडितो की बात करने वाला कोई नहीं है क्योकि वो हिन्दू है। 20,000 कश्मीरी हिन्दू बस धुप की गर्मी के कारण मर गए क्योकि वो कश्मीर के ठन्डे मौसम में रहने के आदि थे।
अधिक जानकारी के लिए यह विडियो आप देख सकते है:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqSqn0id-IE [Shocking, Tragic and Horrible story of Kashmiri Pandits]
पार्ट 8: कश्मीरी पंडितो और भारतीय सेना के खिलाफ भारतीय मीडिया का षड्यंत्र
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
आज देश के लोगो को कश्मीरी पंडितो के मानवाधिकारों के बारे में भारतीय मीडिया नहीं बताती है लेकिन आंतकवादियों के मानवाधिकारों के बारे में जरुर बताती है। आज सभी को यह बताया जा रहा था है की ASFA नाम का किसी कानून का भारतीय सेना काफी ज्यादा दुरूपयोग किया है। कश्मीर में अलगावादी संगठन मासूम लोगो की हत्या करवाते है और भारतीय सेना के जवान जब उन आतंकियों के खिलाफ कोई करवाई करते है तो यह अलगावादी नेता अपने बिकीहुए मीडिया के सहायता से चीखना चिल्लाना शुरू कर देते है की देखो हमारे ऊपर कितना अत्याचार हो रहा है।
मित्रों, बात यहाँ तक नहीं रुकी है। अश्विन कुमार जैसे कुछ डाइरेक्टर इंशाल्लाह कश्मीर नामक पिक्चर बना रहे है और यह पुरे विश्व की लोगो को यह दिखा रहे है की कश्मीर के भोले भाले मुस्लिम युवाओ पर भारतीय सेना के जवानों ने अत्याचार किया है। अश्विन कुमार अपने वृत्तचित्र पूरे विश्व के पटल पर रख रहे है। हर तरह से देश और विदेश में लोगो को दिखा रहे है की गलती भारतीय सेना की है..लेकिन जो सच्चाई है वो बिलकुल यह छिपा दे रहे है।
इस विडियो में देखे की किस प्रकार भारतीय सेना के खिलाफ सद्यन्त्र किया जा रहा है:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LofOulSw07k – [Anti Hindu and Anti Indian Military – Indian Secular Media Exposed!]
पार्ट 9: निष्कर्ष
~~~~~~~~~~~~
सारे मुस्लिम कहते है मोदी को फांसी दो जबकि मोदी ने गुजरात की दंगो को समय रहते रोक दिया। लेकिन आज तक एक भी मुस्लिम को यह कहते नहीं सुना गया की कांग्रेस के नेताओं, गाँधी परिवार और अब्दुल्लाह परिवार को फांसी दो। जो लाखो कश्मीरी पंडितो के कत्लेआम देखते रहे।
मित्रों, इस कहानी को अगर आप पढ़ चुके है तो अपने बाकी मित्रो के साथ शेयर करे ताकि उन्हें भी सत्य का ज्ञान हो। जो कश्मीर में हुआ था, आज वो मुस्लिम बहुल केरल, पश्चिम बंगाल, हैदराबाद, यूपी के कुछ भागो में हो रहा है। हिन्दुओ पर आज अत्याचार देश के काफी जगहों में हो रहा है। लेकिन सेकुलर मीडिया कुछ बताती नहीं इसलिए आपको और हमें कुछ पता नहीं चल पता है और इसलिए हमारा या आपका कोई दोष भी नहीं है। अगर हमें कुछ पता ही नहीं चलेगा तो हम करेंगे क्या?
आज जितने भी प्रिंट और इलेक्ट्रोनिक मीडिया है ज्यादातर को अरब से तेल का पैसा मिलता है। यह सेकुलर मीडिया हिन्दुओं के विनाश के बाद ही रुकेगी क्योकि हिन्दू संस्था, पार्टी कभी मीडिया पर ध्यान ही नहीं देती। आज की सेकुलर मीडिया आधी जिहादियो और आधी कांग्रेस्सियो के नियत्रण में है। हिन्दुओ के साथ हो रहे अत्याचार को बताने के लिए एक भी टीवी या प्रिंट मीडिया नहीं है।
मित्रों, हम नहीं चाहते एक और कश्मीर बने। हम नहीं चाहते की हमारे बच्चे 10 सालों के बाद केरलाइ हिन्दू, बंगाली हिन्दुओ के बारे में कहानिया सुने जैसा हम आज कश्मीरी हिन्दुओ के बारे में सुनते हैं।
http://kasmiripandits.blogspot.com/2012/03/kasmiri-pandit-untold-story.html
==
Shocking, Tragic and Horrible story of Kashmiri Pandits
A Letter by Vallabh bhai Patel to Jawaharlal Nehru
From: D R Belle
Subject: A Letter by Valaabhai Patel to Jawaharlal Nehru
Date: Sunday, May 6, 2012, 9:06 PM
From: Rear Admiral Vasanth BR
EXTRACT FROM THE BOOK:
“HISTORY OF THE FREEDOM MOVEMENT IN INDIA – VOL 3”
– DR R.C. MAJUMDAR – Firma KLM, Kolkata – (Pages 609-610)
We are now in a position to assert with confidence that the formation of the INA was one of the major grounds for the decision of the British Government to quit India This was admitted by no less a person than Clement Attlee, the head of the British Government which conceived the idea of granting freedom to India and carried out the decision in spite of opposition of die-hard Conservatives like Churchill. This is proved by the (English translation here) following extract of a letter in Bengali by Shri PB Chakravarti, ex Chief Justice of the High Court, Calcutta, on 30 March 1976.
QUOTE
“While I was acting as the Governor of West Bengal (in 1956) Lord Attlee, who gave India Freedom by putting an end to British rule, visited India and stayed in Raj Bhavan, Calcutta for two days. I had then a long talk with him about the REAL GROUNDS for the voluntary withdrawal of the British from India I put it straight to him like this:
“The Quit India Movement of Gandhi practically died out long before 1947 and there was nothing in the Indian situation at that time which made it necessary for the British to leave India in a hurry. Why then did they do so?”
In reply, Attlee cited several reasons, THE MOST IMPORTANT OF WHICH WERE THE ACTIVITIES OF NETAJI SUBHAS CHANDRA BOSE WHICH WEAKENED THE VERY FOUNDATION OF THE ATTACHMENT OF THE INDIAN LAND AND NAVAL FORCES TO THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT.
Towards the end, I asked Lord Attlee about the extent to which the British decision to quit India was influenced by Gandhi’s activities.
On hearing the question Attlee’s lips widened in a smile of disdain. He uttered, slowly emphasising on each single letter -’ MI-NI-MAL’.
UNQUOTE
***************************************************
LETTER BY VALLABHAI PATEL TO JAWAHARLAL NEHRU
“Makers of India’s Foreign Policy: From Raja Rammohun Roy to Yashwant Sinha” – by – JN Dixit – published by India Today (The EMPHASISES are by INDIA TODAY)
NEW DELHI
7 November 1950
My Dear Jawaharlal,
Ever since my return from Ahmedabad and after the Cabinet meeting the same day which I had to attend at practically 15 minutes notice and for which I regret I was not able to read all the papers, I thought I should share with you what is passing through my mind.
I have carefully gone through the correspondence between the External Affairs Ministry and our Ambassador in Peking and through him the Chinese Government. I have tried to peruse this correspondence favourably(sic) to our Ambassador and the Chinese Government as possible, but I regret to say that neither of them comes out well as a result of this study, The Chinese Government has tried to delude us by professions of peaceful intentions. My own feeling is that at a crucial period they managed to instil into our Ambassador a false sense of confidence in their so called desire to settle the Tibetan problem by peaceful means.
There can be no doubt that during the period covered by this correspondence, the Chinese must have been concentrating for an onslaught on Tibet The final action of the Chinese, in my judgement, is little short of perfidy. The tragedy of it is that the Tibetans put faith in us; they chose to be guided by us; and we have been unable to get them out of the meshes of Chinese diplomacy or Chinese malevolence. From the latest position, it appears that we shall not be able to rescue the Dalai Lama.
Our Ambassador has been at great pains to find an explanation or justification for Chinese policy and actions. As the External Affairs Ministry remarked in one of their telegrams, there was a lack of firmness and unnecessary apology in one or two representations that he made to the Chinese Government on our behalf.
It is impossible to imagine any sensible person believing in the so-called threat to China from Anglo-American diplomacy or strategy. This feeling, if genuinely entertained by the Chinese in spite of your direct approaches to them, indicates that even though we regard ourselves as friends of China, ’THE CHINESE DO NOT REGARD US AS THEIR FRIENDS(EMPHASIS MINE!!). With the Communist mentality of’ whoever is not with them being against them’, this is a significant pointer, of which we have to take due note.
During the last several months, outside the Russian camp, we have been practically alone in championing the cause of Chinese entry into the UNO and in securing from the Americans assurances on the question of Formosa We have done everything we could to assuage Chinese feelings, to allay its apprehensions and to defend its legitimate claims in our discussions and correspondence with America and Britain and in the UNO. In spite of this, China is not convinced about our disinterestedness; it continues to regard us with suspicion and the whole psychology is one, at least outwardly, of skepticism, perhaps mixed with a little hostility.
I doubt if we can go any further than we have done already to convince China of our good intentions, friendliness and goodwill. In Peking we have an Ambassador who is eminently suitable for putting across the friendly point of view. Even he seems to have failed to convert the Chinese. Their last telegram to us is an act of gross discourtesy not only in the summary way it disposes of our protest against the entry of Chinese forces into Tibet but also in the wild insinuation that our attitude is determined by foreign influences. It looks as though it is not a friend speaking in that language but a “POTENTIAL ENEMY”(EMPHASIS MINE).
With this background, we have to consider what new situation we are now faced with as a result of the disappearance of Tibet, as we knew it, and the Chinese expansion almost up to our gates. Throughout history, we have been seldom worried about our North-East frontier. The Himalayas have been regarded as an impregnable barrier against any threat from the North. We had a friendly Tibet, which gave us no trouble. The Chinese were divided. They had their own domestic problems and never bothered us about our frontiers.
In 1914, we entered into a convention with Tibet, which was not endorsed by the Chinese. We seem to have regarded Tibetan autonomy as extending to (an) independent treaty relationship. Presumably, all that we required was the Chinese counter-signature. The Chinese interpretation of suzerainty seems to be different. We can, therefore, safely assume that very soon they will disown all the stipulations which Tibet has entered into in the past. That throws all frontier and commercial settlements with Tibet, in accordance with which we had been functioning and acting during the last half a century, into the melting pot.
China is no longer divided. It is united and strong. All along the Himalayas in the North and North-East, we have on our side of the frontier a population not ethnologically or culturally different from Tibetans or Mongoloids. The undefined state of the frontier and existence on our side of a population with affinities to Tibetans or Chinese has all the elements of potential trouble between China and us. Recent and bitter history also tells us that communism is no shield against imperialism, and that COMMUNISTS ARE AS GOOD OR AS BAD IMPERIALISTS AS ANY OTHER (EMPHASIS MINE!!).
Chinese ambitions in this respect not only cover the Himalayan slopes on our side but also include important parts of Assam They have their ambitions in Burma also. Burma has the added difficulty that it has no McMahan Line around which to build up even the semblance of an agreement. Chinese communist imperialism are different from the expansionism or imperialism of the Western Powers. The former has an ideological cloak, WHICH MAKES IT TEN TIMES WORSE (EMPHASIS MINE!!).
Racial, national or historical claims lie concealed in the guise of ideological expansion. The danger from the North and North-East, therefore, becomes both communist and imperialist. While our Western and North-Western threat to security is still as prominent as before, A NEW THREAT HAS DEVELOPED FROM THE NORTH AND NORTH-EAST (EMPHASIS MINE!!).
Thus for the first time after centuries, India’s defence has to concentrate on two fronts simultaneously. Our defence measures have so far been based on calculations of superiority over Pakistan We shall now have to reckon with communist China in the North and North-East, A COMMUNIST CHINA WHICH HAS DEFINITE AMBITIONS AND AIMS AND WHICH DOES NOT IN ANY WAY SEEM FRIENDLY TOWARDS US(EMPHASIS MINE!!)
Let us also consider the political conditions on this potentially troublesome frontier. Our Northern or North Eastern approaches consist of Nepal, Bhutan, Sikkim, Darjeeling and tribal areas in Assam They are weak from the point of view of communications. Continuous defensive lines do not exist. There is an almost unlimited scope for infiltration. Police protection is limited to a very small number of passes. There, too, our outposts do not seem to be fully manned. Our contact with these areas is by no means close and intimate.
The people inhabiting these portions have no established loyalty or devotion to India Even the Darjeeling and Kalimpong areas are not free from pro Mongoloid prejudices. During the last three years, we have not been able to make any appreciable approaches to the Nagas and other hill tribes in Assam European missionaries and other visitors have been in touch with them, but their influence was in no way friendly where Indians were considered. There was political ferment in Sikkim some time ago. It is quite possible that discontent is smouldering there.
Bhutan is comparatively quiet, but its affinity with Tibetans would be a handicap. Nepal has a weak oligarchic regime based almost entirely on force; it is in conflict with a turbulent element of the population, as well as with enlightened ideas of modern age. In these circumstances, to make people aware of the new danger, or to increase the defensive strength is a very difficult task indeed; and that difficulty can be got over only by enlightened firmness, strength and a clear line of policy.
I am sure the Chinese and their source of inspiration, Soviet Russia, would not miss any opportunity of exploiting these weak spots, partly in support of their ideology and partly their ambition. In my judgement, therefore, the situation is one in which we cannot afford to be either complacent or vacillating. We must have a clear idea of what we wish to achieve and the methods by which we should achieve it. Any lack of decisiveness in formulating our objectives or pursuing our policy to attain them is bound to weaken us and increase the threats.
Along with these external dangers, we shall now have to face serious internal problems as well. Hitherto, the Communist Party of India has found some difficulty in contacting communists abroad, or in getting supplies of arms, literature etc. from them. They had to contend with the difficult Burmese and Pakistan frontiers in the East or with the long seaboard. They shall now have a comparatively easy means of access to Chinese communists, and through them to other foreign communists. Infiltration of spies, fifth columnists and communists would now be easier.
The whole situation thus raises a number of problems on which we must come to an early decision so that we can, as I said earlier, formulate the objectives and methods of our policy.
It is also clear that the action will have to be fairly comprehensive, involving not only our defence strategy and state of preparations, but also problems of internal security. We shall also have to deal with administrative and political problems in the weak spots along the frontier to which I have already referred.
It is, of course, impossible for me to exhaustively set out all the problems. I have, however, given below some of the problems which, in my opinion, require early solutions, around which we have to build our administrative or military policy measures.
It is possible that a consideration of these matters may lead us into wider questions of our relationship with China, Russia, America, Britain and Burma. This, however, would be of a general nature, though some may be important. For instance, we might have to consider whether we should not enter into closed association with Burma in order to strengthen the latter in its dealings with China
I do not rule out the possibility that, before applying pressure on us, China may do the same to Burma. With Burma, the frontier is entirely undefined and the Chinese territorial claims are more substantial. In its present position, Burma might offer an easier problem for China and, therefore, might claim its first attention. I suggest that we meet early to have a general discussion on these problems and decide on such steps as we might think to be immediately necessary and direct quick examination of other problems with a view to taking early measures to deal with them.
Yours,
Vallabhai Patel
India government allowing Pak-Bangla infiltration is the worst corruption
From: J.G. Arora jgarora@gmail.com
Dear friends,
India government allowing Pak-Bangla infiltration is the worst corruption
While wishing complete success to Swami Ram Dev’s anti-corruption agitation starting from June 3, 2012, this is to suggest that deportation of crores of Pak-Bangla infiltrators should also be a part of this agitation for the following reasons:
1. The worst problem facing India at present is the government’s inaction against infiltration of crores of Pak-Bangla nationals into India; and the government allowing the said infiltration is the worst corruption.
2. In their bid to dismember and bleed India through “a thousand cuts”, Pakistan and Bangladesh have sent countless terrorists and crores of their nationals into India to plant more Pakistans and Bangladeshs on Indian soil.
3. Central and State governments, main stream media, major political parties, and various anti-corruption organisations including those of Anna Hazare and Swami Ram Dev are silent spectators while India is being grabbed bit by bit by Pak-Bangla infiltrators every day; and though this infiltration has changed the demographics of many towns and states all over India.
4. AASU leader Sarbananda Sonowal took the issue of Bangladeshi infiltration to Supreme Court. By its judgment dated July 12, 2005, Supreme Court termed Bangladeshi infiltration as “external aggression” and directed that “Bangladeshi nationals who have trespassed into Assam or are living in other parts of the country have no legal right of any kind to remain in India and they are liable to be deported.”
5. Instead of deporting the infiltrators, on February 10, 2006, UPA government brought in the Foreigners (Tribunals for Assam) Order to nullify the Supreme Court’s judgment. But on December 5, 2006, Supreme Court quashed this Order also as unconstitutional, and called for implementation of its earlier judgment dated July 12, 2005 for deporting illegal immigrants.
6. Despite the Supreme Court’s above-mentioned judgments, no infiltrators have been deported by the government. Rather, infiltrators are being given voting rights. And further infiltration is continuing.
7. In order to prevent the creation of more Pakistans and Bangladeshs on Indian soil, and to protect Hindu identity of truncated India, all nationalist individuals and social and religious organisations must ensure the implementation of Supreme Court’s above-mentioned judgments to deport the infiltrators.
Shubham astu,
J.G. Arora
Destruction of Hindu temples as recorded by Muslim Historians
From: S kumar <kumar_8134@yahoo. com>
Destruction of Hindu temples as recorded by Muslim Historians. . .
Of The Book: Hindustan Islami Ahad mein (India under Islamic Rule) Name Of The Historian: Maulana Abdul Hai. About The Author: He is a highly respected scholar and taken as an authority on Islamic history. Because of his scholarship and his services to Islam, Maulana Abdul Hai was appointed as the Rector of the Darul Nadwa Ullum Nadwatal-Ulama. He continued in that post till his death in February 1923. The following section is taken from the chapter Hindustan ki Masjidein (The mosques of India) of the above mentioned book. Here we can see a brief description of few important mosques in India and how each one of them was built upon plundered Hindu temples.
1. Qawwat al-Islam Mosque at Delhi: “According to my findings the first mosque of Delhi is Qubbat al-Islam or Quwwat al_Islam which, Qutubud-Din Aibak constructed in H. 587 after demolishing the hindu temple built by Prithvi Raj and leaving certain parts of the temple outside the mosque proper; and when he returned from Ghazni in H. 592 he started building, under orders from Shihabud -Din Ghori, a huge mosque of inimitable red stones, and certain parts of the temple were included in the mosque. . . ”
2. The Mosque at Jaunpur: “This was built by Sultan Ibrahim Sharqi with chiselled stones. Originally it was a Hindu temple after demolishing which he constructed the mosque. It is known as the Atala Masjid. . ”
3. The Mosque at Qanauj: “It is well known that this mosque was built on the foundations of some Hindu temple that stood here. The mosque was built by Ibrahim Sharqi in H. 809 as is recorded in Gharbat Nigar”
4. Jami Masjid at Etawah: “This mosque stands on the bank of the Jamuna at Etawah. There was a Hindu temple at this place, on the site of which this mosque was constructed. . ”
5. Babri Masjid at Ayodhya: “This mosque was constructed by Babar at Ayodhya which Hindus call the birth place of Ramchandraji. . . Sita had a temple here in which she lived and cooked for her husband. On that very site Babar constructed this mosque in H. 963 ”
6. Mosque at Benaras: “Mosque of Benares was built by Alamgir Aurangzeb on the site of Bisheshwar Temple . That temple was very tall and held as holy among Hindus. On this very site and with those very stones he constructed a lofty mosque, and its ancient stones were rearranged after being embedded in the walls of the mosque. It is one of the renowned mosques of Hindustan . ”
7. Mosque at Mathura: “Alamgir Aurangzeb built a mosque at Mathura . This mosque was built on site of the Govind Dev Temple which was very strong and beautiful as well as exquisite. . ”
Name Of The Book: Futuhu’l-Buldan Name Of The Historian: Ahmed bin Yahya bin Jabir About The Author: This author is also known as al- Biladhuri. He lived at the court of Khalifa Al- Mutawakkal (AD 847-861) and died in AD 893. His history is one of the major Arab chronicles. The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:
1. Ibn Samurah (AD 653) Siestan (Iran) “On reaching Dawar, he surrounded the enemy in the mountain of Zur, where there was a famous Hindu temple. ” “. . . Their idol of Zur was of gold, and its eyes were two rubies. The zealous Musalmans cut off its hands and plucked out its eyes, and then remarked to the Marzaban how powerless was his idol. . . “
2. Qutaibah bin Muslim al-Bahili (AD 705-715) Samarkand (Farghana) “Other authorities say that Kutaibah granted peace for 700,000 dirhams and entertainment for the Moslems for three days. The terms of surrender included also the houses of the idols and the fire temples. The idols were thrown out,plundered of their ornaments and burned. . . “
3. Mohammed bin Qasim (AD 712-715) Debal (Sindh) “. . . The town was thus taken by assault, and the carnage endured for three days. The governor of the town, appointed by Dahir, fled and the priests of the temple were massacred. Muhammad marked a place for the Musalmans to dwell in, built a mosque, and left 4,000 Musalmans to garrison the place. . . ” “. . . ‘Ambissa son of Ishak Az Zabbi, the governor of Sindh, in the Khilafat of Mu’tasim billah knocked down the upper part of the minaret of the temple and converted it into a prison. . . “ Multan (Punjab) “. . . He then crossed the Biyas, and went towards Multan . . . Muhammad destroyed the water-course; upon which the inhabitants, oppressed with thirst, surrendered at discretion. He massacred the men capable of bearing arms, but the children were taken captive, as well as ministers of the temple, to the number of 6,000. The Musalmans found there much gold in a chamber ten cubits long by eight broad. . . ”
4. Hasham bin ‘Amru al-Taghlabi Khandahar (Maharashtra) “He then went to Khandahar in boats and conquered it. He destroyed the Budd(idol) there, and built in its place a mosque. “
Name Of The Book: Tarikh-i-Tabari Name Of The Historian: Abu Ja’far Muhammad bin Jarir at-Tabari About The Author: This author is considered to be the foremost historian of Islam. The above mentioned book written by him is regarded as the mother of histories. The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:
5. Qutaibah bin Muslim al-Bahili (AD 705-715) Beykund (Khurasan) “The ultimate capture of Beykund (in AD 706) rewarded him with an incalculable booty; even more than had hitherto fallen into the hands of the Mohammedans by the conquest of the entire province of Khorassaun; and the unfortunate merchants of the town, having been absent on a trading excursion while their country was assailed by the enemy, and finding their habitations desolate on their return contributed further to enrich the invaders, by the ransom which they paid for the recovery of their wives and children. The oranments alone, of which these women had been plundered, being melted down, produce, in gold, 150,000 meskals; of a dram and a half each. Among the articles of the booty, is also described an image of gold, of 50,000 meskals, of which the eyes were two pearls, the exquisite beauty and magnitude of which excited the surprise and admiration of Kateibah. They were transmitted by him, with a fifth of the spoil to Hejauje, together with a request that he might be permitted to distribute, to the troops, the arms which had been found in the palace in great profusion. ”
Samarkand (Farghana) “A breach was, however, at last effected in the walls of the city in AD 712 by the warlike machines of Kateibah; and some of the most daring of its defenders having fallen by the skill of his archers, the besieged demanded a cessation of arms to the following day, when they promised to capitulate. The request was acceded to the Kateibah; and a treaty was the next day accordingly concluded between him and the prince of Samarkand, by which the latter engaged for the annual payment of ten million of dhirems, and a supply of three thousand slaves; of whom it was particularly stipulated, that none should either be in a state of infancy, or ineffective from old age and debility. He further contracted that the ministers of his religion should be expelled from their temples and their idols destroyed and burnt; that Kateibah should be allowed to establish a mosque in the place of the principal temple. . . . “
“. . . Kateibah accordingly set set fire to the whole collection with his own hands; it was soon consumed to ashes, and 50,000 meskals of gold and silver, collected from the nails which had been used in the workmanship of the images. ”
6. Yaqub bin Laith (AD 870-871) Balkh and Kabul (Afghanistan)
“He took Bamian, which he probably reached by way of Herat, and then marched on Balkh where he ruined (the temple) Naushad. On his way back from Balkh he attacked Kabul . . . ” “Starting from Panjhir, the place he is known to have visited, he must have passed through the capital city of the Hindu Sahis to rob the sacred temple –the reputed place of coronation of the Sahi rulers — of its sculptural wealth. . . ” “The exact details of the spoil collected from Kabul valley are lacking. The Tarikh [-i-Sistan] records 50 idols of gold and silver and Mas’udi mentions elephants. The wonder excited in Baghdad by baghdad by elephants and pagan idols forwarded to the Caliph by Ya’qub also speaks for their high value. ”
Name Of The Book: Tarikhu’l-Hind Name Of The Historian: Abu Rihan Muhammad bin Ahmad al-Biruni al-Khwarizmi. About The Author: This author spent 40 years in India during the reign of Sultan Mahmud of Ghazni (AD 997 – 1030). His history treats of the literature and learning of the Hindus at the commencement of the 11th century.
The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:
7. Jalam ibn Shaiban (9th century AD) Multan (Punjab) “A famous idol of theirs was that of Multan, dedicated to the sun, and therefore called Aditya. It was of wood and covered with red Cordovan leather; in its two eyes were two red rubies. It is said to have been made in the last Kritayuga . . . . . When Muhammad Ibn Alkasim Ibn Almunaibh conquered Multan, he inquired how the town had become so very flourishing and so many treasures had there been accumulated, and then he found out that this idol was the cause, for there came pilgrims from all sides to visit it. Therefore he thought it best to have the idol where it was, but he hung a piece of cow’s flesh on its neck by way of mockery. On the same place a mosque was built. When the Karmatians occupied Multan, Jalam Ibn Shaiban, the usurper, broke the idol into pieces and killed its priests. . . “
8. Sultan Mahmud of Gazni (AD 997-1030) Thanesar (Haryana) “The city of Taneshar is highly venerated by Hindus. The idol of that place iscalled Cakrasvamin, i. e., the owner of the cakra, a weapon which we have already described. It is of bronze, and is nearly the size of a man. It is now lying in the hippodrome in Ghazna, together with the Lord of Somnath, which is a representation of the penis of the Mahadeva, called Linga. ” Somnath (Gujrat) “The linga he raised was the stone of Somnath, for soma means the moon and natan means master, so that the whole word means master of the moon. The image was destroyed by the Prince Mahmud, may God be merciful to him! –AH 416. He ordered the upper part to be broken and the remainder to be transported to his residence, Ghaznin, with all its coverings and trappings of gold, jewels, and embroided garments. Part of it has been thrown into the hippodrome of the town, together with Cakrasvamin, an idol of bronze, that had been brought from Taneshar. Another part of the idol from Somnath lies before the door of the mosque of Ghaznin, on which people rub their feet to clean them from dirt and wet. “
Name Of The Book: Kitabu’l-Yamini Name Of The Historian: Abu Nasr Muhammad ibn Muhammad al Jabbaru’l-Utbi. About The Author: This author’s work comprises the whole of the reign of Subuktigin and that of Sultan Mahmud down to the year AD 1020.
The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:
Amir Sbuktigin Of Ghazni Lamghan (Afghanistan) “The Amir marched out towards Lamghan, which is a city celebrated for its great strength and abounding wealth. He conquered it and set fire to the places in its vicinity which were inhabited by infidels, and demolishing idol temples, he established Islam in them. He marched and captured other cities and killed the polluted wretches, destroying the idolaters and gratifying the Musulmans. “Sultan Mahmud of Ghazni (AD 997-1030) Narain (Rajasthan) “The Sultan again resolved on an expedition to Hind, and marched towards Narain, urging his horses and moving over ground, hard and soft, until he came to the middle of Hind, where he reduced chiefs, who, up to that time obeyed no master, overturned their idols, put to the sword the vagabonds of that country, and with delay and circumspection proceeded to accomplish his design. . . ”
Nardin (Punjab) “After the Sultan had purified Hind from idolatry, and raised mosques therein, he determined to invade the capital of Hind to punish those who kept idols and would not acknowledge the unity of God. . . He marched with a large army in the year AH 404 (AD 1013) during a dark night. . . ”
“A stone was found there in the temple of the great Budda on which an inscription was written purporting that the temple had been founded 50,000 years ago. The Sultan was surprised at the ignorance of these people, because those who believe in the true faith represent that only seven hundred years have elapsed since the creation of the world, and the signs of resurrection are even now approaching. The Sultan asked his wise men the meaning of this inscription and they all concurred in saying that it was false, and no faith was to be put in the evidence of a stone. ”
Thanesar (Haryana) “The chief of Tanesar was. . . obstinate in his infidelity and denial of God. So the Sultan marched against him with his valiant warriors, for the purpose of planting the standards of Islam and extirpating idolatry. . ” “The blood of the infidels flowed so copiously, that the stream was discoloured, notwithstanding its purity, and people were unable to drink it. . . The victory gained by God’s grace, who has established Islam for ever as the best religions, notwithstanding that idolaters revolt against it. . . Praise be to God, the protector of the world, for the honour he bestows upon Islam and Musulmans. “
Mathura (Uttar Pradesh) “The Sultan then departed from the environs of the city, in which was a temple of the Hindus. The name of this place was Mahartul Hind. . . On both sides of the city there were a thousand houses, to which idol temples were attached, all strengthened from top to bottom by rivets of iron, and all made of masonry work. . . ” “In the middle of the city there was a temple larger and firmer than the rest, which can neither be described nor painted. The Sultan thus wrote respecting it:–‘If any should wish to construct a building equal to this, he would not be able to do it without expending an 100,000,000 red dinars, and it would occupy 200 years even though the most experience and able workmen were employed’. . . The Sultan gave orders that all temples should be burnt with naptha and fire, and levelled with the ground. “
Kanauj (Uttar Pradesh) “In Kanauj there were nearly 10,000 temples, which the idolaters falsely and absurdly represented to have been founded by their ancestors two or three hundred thousand years ago. . . Many of the inhabitants of the place fled and were scattered abroad like so many wretched widows and orphans, from the fear which oppressed them, in consequence of witnessing the fate of their deaf and dumb idols. Many of them thus effected their escape, and those who did not fly were put to death. “
The following is a continuation of last week’s article, Destruction Of Hindu Temples By Muslims –
Part I. In this article you will once again notice the Muslim Historians glorify the crimes committed by the Muslims in India. As stated and proved in my previous articles the glorification of such crimes has been recorded because the Koran promotes and supports such criminal acts. The following is a presentation of the literary evidence available to us. This evidence stated below is in chronological order with reference to the time at which a particular work was written.
Name Of The Book: Diwan-i-Salman Name Of The Historian: Khawajah Masud bin Sa’d bin Salman About The Author: Khawajah Masud bin Sa’d bin Salman was a poet. He wrote poems in praise of the Ghaznavid Sultans- Masu’d, Ibrahim and
Bahram Shah. He died sometime between AD 1126 and 1131.
The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:
Sultan Abu’l Muzaffar Ibrahim (AD 1059-1099) “As power and the strength of a lion was bestowed upon Ibrahim by the Almighty, he made over to him the well-populated country of Hindustan and gave him 40,000 valiant horsemen to take the country, in which there were more than 1000 rais. . . The army of the king destroyed at one time a thousand temples of idols, which had each been built for more than a thousand years. How can I describe the victories of the King. . . ” Jalandhar (Punjab) “The narrative of any battles eclipses the stories of Rustam and Isfandiyar. . . By morning meal, not one soldier, not one Brahmin remained unkilled or uncaptured. Their heads were levelled with the ground with falming fire. . Thou has secured the victory to the country and to religion, for amongst the Hindus this achievement will be remembered till the day of resurrection.
“Malwa (Madhya Pradesh) “. . On this journey, the army destroyed a thousand idol-temples and thy elephants trampled over more than a hundred strongholds. Thou didst march thy army to Ujjan; . . The lip of infidelity became dry through fear of thee, the eye of plural-worship became blind. . ”
Name Of The Book: Chach-Namah Name Of The Historian: Mohammed Al bin Hamid bin Abu Bakr Kufi About The Author: The Persian history was translated from arabic by the above mentioned author in the time of Nasiruddin Qabacha, a slave of Mohammed Ghori.
The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:
Mohammed bin Qasim (AD 712-715)Siwistan and Sisam (Sindh)Mohammed bin Qasem wrote to al-Hajjaj, the governor of Iraq :”The forts of Siwistan and Sism have been already taken. The nephew of Dahir, his warriors and principla officers have been despatched, and infidels converted to Islam or destroyed. Instead of idol temples, mosques and other places of worship have been built, pulpits have been erected, the Khutba is read, the call to prayers is raised so that devotions are performed at sacred hours. ”
Multan (Punjab). . “Mohammed Qasem arose and with his counsellors, guards and attendants, went to the temple. He saw there an idol made of gold. and its two eye were bright red rubies. “. . Muhammed Qasem ordered the idol to be taken up. Two hundred and thirty “mans” of gold were brought to the treasury together with the gems and pearls and treasures which were obtained from the plunder of Multan . “
Name Of The Book: Jamiu’l-Hikayat Name Of The Historian: Maulana Nuruddin Muhammed `UfiAbout The Author: The author was born in or near the city of Bukhara in Transoxiana. He came to India and lived in Delhi for some time in the reign ofShamsu’d-Din Iltutmish (AD 1210-1236)
The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:
Amru bin Laith (AD 879-900) Sakawand (Afghanistan) “It is related that Amru Lais conferred the governorship of Zabulistan on Fardaghan and sent him there at the head of four thousand horses. There was a large Hindu place of worship in that country, which was called Sakawand and people used to come on pilgrimage from the most remote parts of Hindustan to the idols of that place. When Fardaghan arrived in Zabulistan he led his army against it, took the temple, broke the idols in pieces and overthrew the idolators. . . “
Name Of The Book: Taju’l-Ma’sir Name Of The Historian: Sadru’d-Din Muhammed Hasan Nizamii About The Author: The author was born at Nishapur in Khurusan. He had to leave his ancestral place because of the Mongol invasion. He came to India and started writing his history in AD 1205.
The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:
Sultan Muhammed Ghuri (AD 1175-1206) Ajmer (Rajasthan) “He destroyed the pillars and foundations of the idol temples and built in their stead mosques and colleges, and the precepts of Islam, and the customs of the law were divulged and established. . . ”
Kuhram and Samana (Punjab) “The Government of the fort of Kohram and Samana were made over by the Sultan to Kutuu-din. . He purged by his sword the land of Hind from the filth of infidelity and vice, and freed it from the thorn of God-plurality, and the impurity of idol-worship and by his royal vigour and intrepidity, left not one temple standing. . . ”
Meerut (Uttar Pradesh) “Kutub-d din marched from Kohran and when he arrived at Meerut which is one of the celebrated forts of the country of Hind, for the strength of its foundations and superstructure, and its ditch, which was as broad as the ocean and fathomless- an army joined him, sent by the dependent chiefs of the country. The fort was captured, and a Kotwal was appointed to take up his station in the fort, and all the idol temples were converted into mosques. ”
Delhi “He then marched and encamped under the fort of Delhi . . . The city and its vicinity were freed from idols and idol-worhips, and in the sanctuaries of the images of the Gods, mosques were raised by the worshippers of one God. Kutub-d din built the Jami Masjid at Delhi and adorned it with stones and gold obtained from the temples which had been demolished by the elephants, and covered it with inscriptions in Toghra, containing the divine commands. “
Varanasi (Uttar Pradesh) “From that place (Asni) the royal army proceeded towards Benares which is the center of the country of Hind and here they destroyed nearly 1000 temples, and raised mosques on their foundations and the knowledge of the law became promulgated, and the foundations of religion were established. . ”
Aligarh (Uttar Pradesh) “There was a certain tribe in the neighbourhood of Kol which had. . occasioned much trouble. . Three bastions were raised as high as heaven with their heads, and their carcases became the food of beasts of prey. That tract was freed from idols and idol worship and the foundation of infidelity were destroyed”. .
Bayana (Rajasthan) “When Kutub-d din heard of Sultan’s march from Ghazna, he was much rejoiced and advanced as far as Hansi to meet him. . In the year AH 592 (AD 1196), they marched towards Thangar, and the center of idolatry and perdition became the abode of glory and splendour. . “
Kalinjar (Uttar Pradesh) “In the year AH 599 (Ad 1202), Kutub-d din proceeded to the investment Kalinjar, on which expedition he was accompanied by the Sahib-Kiran, Shamsu-d din Altmash. . . The temples were converted into mosques and abodes of goodness, and the ejaculations of bead counters and voices of summoners to prayer ascended to high heaven, and the very name of idolatry was annihilated. . ”
Sultan Shamsu’d-Din Iltutmish (AD 1210-1236) Delhi “The Sultan then returned from Jalor to Delhi . . and after his arrival ‘not a vestige or name remained of idol temples which had raised their heads on high; and the light of faith shone out from the darkness of infidelity. . and the moon of religion and the state became resplendent from the heaven of prosperity and glory. ”
Name Of The Book: Kamilu’t-Tawarikh Name Of The Historian: Ibn Asir About The Author: The author was born in AD 1160 in the Jazirat ibn Umar, an island on the Tigris above Mosul.
The Muslim Rulers he Wrote About:
Khalifa Al-Mahdi (AD 775-785) Barada (Gujrat) “In the year 159 (AD 776) Al Mahdi sent an army by sea under Abdul Malik bin Shahabu’l Musamma’i to India. . They proceeded on their way and at length disembarked at Barada. When they reached the place they laid siege on it. . The town was reduced to extremities and God prevailed over it in the same year. The people were forbidden to worship the Budd, which the Muhammadans burned. ”
Name Of The Book: Tarikh-i-Jahan-Kusha Name Of The Historian: Alaud-Din Malik ibn Bahaud-Din Muhammed JuwainiAbout The Author: The author was born a native of Juwain in Khurasan near Nishapur. He was the Halaku during the Mongol campaign against the Ismai’lians and was later appointed the governor of Baghdad. He fell from grace and was imprisoned at Hamadan.
The Muslim Rulers he Wrote About:
Sultan Jalalud-Din Mankbarni (AD 1222-1231) Debal (Sindh) “The Sultan then went towards Dewal and darbela and Jaisi. . . The Sultan raised Masjid at Dewal, on the spot where an idol temple stood. ”
Name Of The Book: Mifathu’l-Futuh Name Of The Historian: Amir Khusru About The Author: The author, Amir Khusru was born at Delhi in 1253. His father occupied high positions in the reigns of Sultan Shamsu’d Din Iltutmish (AD 1210-1236) and his successors. Reputed to be the dearest disciple of Shykh Nizamuddin Auliya, he became the lick-spittle of whoever came out victorious in the contest for the throne at Delhi . He became the court poet of Balban’s successor, Sultan Kaiqbad.
The Muslim Rulers he wrote About:
Sultan Jajalu’d-Din Khalji (AD 1290-1296) Jhain (Rajasthan) “The Sultan reached Jhain in the afternoon of the third day and stayed in the palace of the Raya. . he greatly enjoyed his stay for some time. Coming out, ho took a round of gardens and temples. The idols he saw amazed him . . Next day he got those idols of gold smashed with stones. The pillars of wood were burnt down by his order. . . A cry rose from the temples as if a second Mahmud has taken birth. Two idols were made of brass, one of which weighed nearly thousand “mans”. He got both of them broken, and the pieces were distributed among his people so that they may throw them at the door of Masjid on their return to Delhi. “
Sultan Alaud-Din Khilji (AD 1296-1316) Vidisha (Madhya Pradesh) “When he advanced from the capital of Karra, the Hindus, in alarm, descended into the earth like ants. He departed towards the garden of Behar to dye that soil with blood as red as tulip. He cleared the road to Ujjain of vile wretches, and created consternation in Bhilsan. When he affected his conquests in that country, he drew out of the river the idols which had been concealed in it.
Devagiri (Maharshtra) “But see the mercy with which he regarded the broken-hearted, for, after seizing the rai, he set him free again. He destroyed the temples of the idolaters, and erected pulpits and arches for mosques. ”
This is Part III of the series of articles on destruction of Hindu Temples by Muslims. Here too, I shall continue to provide the vast amount of literary evidence available to us. This evidence is taken directly from the books written by Muslim Historians themselves who glorify the horrific deeds of their Islamic heroes.
Name Of The Book: Nuh Siphir Name of the Historian: Amir Khusru About the Author: The above mentioned book is the fourth historical mathnavi which Amir Khusru wrote when he was 67 years old. It celebrates the reign of Sultan Mubarak Shah Khalji.
The Muslim Rulers he wrote About:
Sultan Mubarak Shah Khalji (AD 1315-1320)Warrangal (Andhra Pradesh) “They pursued the enemy to the gates and set everything on fire. They burnt down all those gardens and groves. That paradise of idol-worshippers became like hell. The fire-worshippers of “Bud” were in alarm and flocked round their idols. . ”
Name of the Book: Siyaru’l-Auliya
Name of the Historian: Sayyed Muhammed bin Mubarak bin Muhammed About the Author: He was the grandson of an Iranian merchant who traded between Kirman in Iran and Lahore . The family travelled to Delhi after Shykh Farid’s death and became devoted to Shykh Nizamu’d-din Auliya.
The Muslim Rulers he wrote About:
Shykh Mu’in al-Din Chisti Ajmer (AD 1236) Ajmer (Rajasthan) “. . Because of his Sword, instead of idols and temples in the land of unbelief now there are mosques, mihrab amd mimbar. In the land where there were the sayings of the idol-worshippers, there is the sound of ‘Allahu Akbar’. . . The descendants of those who were converted to Islam in this land will live until Day of Judgement; so too will those who bring others into the fold of Islam by the sword of Islam. Until the Day of Judgement these converts will be in debt of Shaykh al-Islam Mu’in al-din Hasam Sijzi. . . ”
Name of the Book: Masalik’ul Absar fi Mamalik’ul Amsar Name of the Historian:
Shihabu’d-Din ‘Abu’l Abbas Ahmed bin Yahya. About the Author: He was born in AD 1301. He was educated in Damascus and Cairo. He is considered to be a great man scholar of his time and author of many books. He occupied high positions in Syria and Egypt.
The Muslim Rulers he wrote About:
Sultan Muhammed bin Tughlaq (AD 1325-1351) “The Sultan is not slack in Jihad. He never lets go of his spear or bridle in pursuing jihad by land and sea routes. This is his main occupation which engages his eyes and ears. Five temples have been destroyed and the images and idols of “Budd” have been broken, and the lands have been freed from those who were not included in the daru’l Islam that is, those who had refused to become zimmis. Thereafter he got mosques and places of worship erected, and music replaced by call to prayers to Allah. . . The Sultan who is ruling at present has achieved that which had not been achieved so far by any king. He has achieved victory, supremacy, conquest of countries, destruction of the infidels, and exposure of magicians. He has destroyed idols by which the people of Hindustan were deceived in vain. . . ”
Name of the Book: Rehala of Ibn Battuta Name of the Historian: Shykh Abu Abdullah Muhammad ibn Ibrahim al-Lawatt at-Tanji al-Maruf be Ibn Battuta.
About the Author: He belonged to an Arab family which was settled in Spain since AD 1312. His grandfather and father enjoyed the reputation of scholars and theologians. He himself was a great scholar who travelled extensively and over many lands. He came to India in 1325 and visited many places. He was very fond of sampling Hindu girls from different parts of India . They were presented to him by the Sultan Mohammed bin-Tughlaq with whom Ibn Battuta came in close contact. He also married Muslim women wherever he stayed and divorced them before his departure.
His Travel description: (Delhi) “Near the eastern gate of the mosque, lie two very big idols of copper connected together by stones. Everyone who comes in and goes out of the mosque treads over them. On the site of this mosque was a bud Khana that is an idol-house. After the conquest of Delhi, it was turned into a mosque. . . “
Name of the Book: Tarikh-i-Firuz Name of the Historian: Shams Siraj Alif
About the Author: The author became a courtier of Sultan Firuz Shah Tughlaq and undertook to complete the aforementioned history of Barani who had stopped at the sixth year of Firuz Shah’s reign.
The Muslim Rulers he wrote About:Sultan Firuz Shah Tughlaq (AD 1351-1388) Puri (Orissa):”The Sultan left Banarasi with the intention of pursuing the Rani of Jajnagar, who had fled to an island in the river. . . News was then brought that in the jangal were seven elephants, and one old shoe-elephant, which was very fierce. The Sultan resolved upon endeavoring to capture these elephants before continuing the pursuit of the Rai. . . After the hunt was over, the Sultan directed his attention to the Rai of Jajnagar, and entering the palace where he dwelt he found many fine buildings. It is reported that inside the Rai’s fort, there was a stone idol which the infidels called Jagannath, and to which they paid their devotions. Sultan Firoz, in emulation of Mahmud Subuktign, having rooted up the idol, carried it away to Delhi where he placed it in an ignominious position. ”
Nagarkot Kangra(Himachal Pradesh)”. . Sultan Muhammed Shah bin Tughlaq and Sultan Firuz Shah Tughlaq were sovereigns especially chosen by Almighty from among the faithful, and in their whole course of their reigns, wherever they took an idol temple they broke and destroyed it. .
” Delhi “A report was brought to the Sultan that there was in Delhi an old Brahmin who persisted in publicly performing the worship of idols in his house; and that people of the city, both Musalmans and Hindus, used to resort to his house to worship the idol. The Brahmin had constructed a wooden tablet which was covered within and without with paintings of demons and other objects. . An order was accordingly given that the Brahmin, with his tablet, should be brought into the presence of the Sultan at Firozabad. The judges and doctors and elders and lawyers were summoned, and the case of the Brahaman was submitted for their opinion. Their reply was that the provisions of the Law were clear: the Brahmin must either become a Musalman or be burned. The true faith was declared to the Brahmin, and the right course pointed out, but he refused to accept it. Orders were given for raising a pile of faggots before the door of the darbar (court). The Brahmin was tied hand and foot and cast into it; the tablet was thrown on top and the pile was lighted. The writer of this book was present at the darbar and witnessed the execution. The tablet of the Brahmin was lighted in two places, at his head and at his feet; the wood was dry and the fire first reached his feet, and drew him a cry, but the flames quickly enveloped his head and consumed him. Behold the Sultan’s strict adherence to law and rectitude, how he would not deviate in the least from its decrees!”
Here Sultan Firuz Shah Tughlaq glorifies his own criminal acts in Bharat as sanctioned by the “holy” Koran. Name of the Book: Futuhat-i-Firuz Shahi
Name of the Historian: Sultan Firuz Shah Tughlaq About the Author: Sultan had got the eight chapters of his work inscribed on eight slabs of stone which were fixed on eight sides of the octagonal dome of a building near the Jami Masjid at Firuzabad.
Prayers of Temple-destroyers in this Book “The next matter which by God’s help I accomplished, was the repetition of names and titles of former sovereigns which had been omitted from the prayers of Sabbaths and Feasts. The names of those sovereigns of Islam, under whose happy fortune and favour infidel countries had been conquered, whose banners had waved over many a land, under whom idol-temples had been demolished, and mosques and pulpits built and exalted. . . “Delhi and Evirons “The Hindus and idol-worshippers had agreed to pay the money for toleration (zar-i zimmiya) and had consented to the poll-tax (jiziya) in return for which they and their families enjoyed security. These people now erected new idol-temples in the city and the environs in opposition to the law of the Prophet which declares that such temples are not to be tolerated. Under divine guidance I destroyed these edifices and I killed those leaders of infidelity who seduced others into error, and the lower orders I subjected to stripes and chastisement, until this abuse was entirely abolished. Following is an instance: In the village of Maluh, there is a tank which they call kund (tank). Here they had built idol-temples and on certain days the Hindus were accustomed to proceed thither on horseback and wearing arms. Their women and children also went out in palankins and carts. Then they assembled in thousands and performed idol worship. . . . When intelligence of this came to my ears my religious feelings prompted me at once to put a stop to this scandal and offence to the religion of Islam. On the day of the assembly I went there in person and I ordered that the leaders of these people and the promoters of these abominations should be put to death. I destroyed their idol-temples and instead there of raised mosques. ”
Gohana (Haryana)”Some Hindus had erected a new idol-temple in the village of Kohana and the idolators used to assemble there and perform their idolatrous rites. These people were seized and brought before me. I ordered that the perverse conduct of the leaders of this wickedness should be publicly proclaimed, and that they should be put to death before the gate of the palace. I also ordered that the infidel books, the idols and the vessels used in their worship, which had been taken with idols, should all be publicly burnt. The others were restrained by threats and punishments, as a warning to all men, that no zimmi could follow such wicked practices in a Muslaman country. ”
Name of the Book: Tarikh-i-Mubarak Shahi Name of the Historian: Yahya Ammad bin Abdullah Sirhindi About the Author: The author lived in the reign of Sultan Muizu’d-Din Abu’l Fath Mubarak Shah (AD 1421-1434) of the Sayyid dynasty which ruled at Delhi from AD 1414-1451.
The Muslim Rulers he wrote About:
Sultan Shamsu’d-Din Iltutmish (AD 1210-1236)Vidisha and Ujjain (Madhya Pradesh) “In AH 631 he invaded Malwah, and after supressing the rebels of that place, he destroyed that idol-temple which had existed there for the past three hundred years. Next he turned towards Ujjain and conquered it, and after demolishing the idol- temple of Mahakal, he uprooted the statue of Bikramajit together with all other statues and images which were placed on pedestals, and brought them to the capital where they were laid before the Jami Masjid for being trodden under foot by the people
Name of the Book: Tarikh-i-MuhammadiName of the Historian: Muhammed Bihamad Khani About the Author: The author was the son of the governor of Irich in Bundelkhand. He was a soldier who participated in several wars. His history covers a long period – from Prophet Mohammed to AD 1438-39
The Muslim Rulers he wrote About:
Sultan Ghiyasu’d-Din Tughlaq Shah II (AD 1388-89)Kalpi (Uttar Pradesh)”In the meanwhile Delhi received news of the defeat of the armies of Islam which were with Malikzada Mahmud bin Firuz Khan. . . This Malikzada reached the bank of the Yamuna via Shahpur and renamed Kalpi which was the abode and center of the infidels and the wicked, as Muhammadabad, after the name of Prophet Muhammed. He got mosques erected for the worship of Allah in places occupied by temples, and made that city his capital.
“Sultan Nasiru’d-Din Mahmud Shah Tughlaq (AD 1389-1412)Prayag and Kara (Uttar Pradesh) “The Sultan moved with the armies of Islam towards Prayag and Arail with the aim of destroying the infidels, and he laid waste both those places. The vast crowd which had collected at Prayag for worshipping false gods was made captive. The inhabitants of Kara were freed from the mischief of rebels on account of this aid from King and the name of this king of Islam became famous by this reason. “Another Moghul ruler by the name of Babur who was in love with a young boy named Baburi glorifies his lecherously Islamic deeds in the Babur-Nama
Name of the Book: Babur-Nama Name of the Author: Zahiru’d-Din Muhammed Babur
About the Author: The author of this book was the founder of Mughal dynasty in India who proclaimed himself a Padshah (Ruler) after his victory in the First Battle of Panipat (AD 1526), and a Ghazi (killer of kafirs) after the defeat of Rana Sanga in the Battle of Khandwa (AD 1528) While presenting himself as an indefatigable warrior and drug-addict he does not hide the cruelties he committed on the defeated people, particularly his fondness for building towers of the heads of those he captured as prisoners of war or killed in battle. He is very liberal in citing appropriate verses from the Quran on the eve of the battle with Rana Sanga. In order to ensure his victory, he makes a covenant with Allah by breaking the vessels containing wine as also the cups for drinking it, swearing at the same time that “he would break the idols of the idol-worshippers in a similar manner”. In the Fath-Nama (prayer for victory) composed for him by Shykh Zain, Allah is described as “destroyers of idols from their foundations” The language he uses for his Hindu adversaries is typically Islamic.
Zahirud-Din Muhammed Babur Padshah Ghazi (AD 1526-1530)Chanderi (Madhya Pradesh) “In AH 934 (AD 1528), I attacked Chanderi and, by the grace of Allah, captured it in a few hours. . We got the infidels slaughtered and the place which had been a daru’l-harb for years, was made into daru’l-Islam. ”
Gwalior (Madhya Pradesh) “Next day, at the time of the noon prayer, we went out for seeing those places in Gwalior which we had not seen yet. . Going out of the Hathipole Gate of the fort, we arrived at a place called Urwa. . Urwa is not a bad place It is an enclosed space. Its biggest blemish is its statues. I ordered that they should be destroyed. . . ”
Part IV of the series of articles on this subject will contain the Epigraphic evidence which is available to us. There are inscriptions on present day Mosques in India which clearly state that the Muslims have converted the existing Hindu temples into Mosques. Note: The passages presented in this article have been taken from Shri Sita Ram Goel’s book, Hindu Temples: What Happened To Them Vol. I & II.
(The Epigraphic Evidence) The Ram Janmabhumi temple at Ayodhya is just one of the Hindu temples among thousands of others which were converted to Islamic structures by the barbaric Muslim Invaders.
The famous Islamic scholar Maulana Abdul Hai has admitted this fact himself in his research work Hindustan Islami Ahad Mein (India Under Islamic Rule). Much of the attention has recently been focused on how many of the Hindu temples were converted to mosques, however, as Sita Ram Goel says, “The more important question, namely, why Hindu temples met the fate they did at the hands of Islamic invaders, has not even been whispered. ” Many Hindus seem to cater to popular opinion that Islam preaches that its followers should not build Islamic structures at other religious sites. However, such people are grossly mistaken. To quote further from Sita Ram Goel: “Hindu leaders have endorsed the Muslim propagandists in proclaiming that Islam does not permit the construction of mosques at other people’s place of worship. One wonders whether this kowtowing to Islam is prompted by ignorance, or cowardice, or calculation, or a combination of them all. The Islam of which the Hindu leaders are talking exists neither in the Qur’an nor in the Sunnah of the Prophet. “
The point made above by Sita Ram Goel is exactly what I have voiced in my previous articles titled, Destruction of Hindu Temples by Muslims. The evidence which I have presented is of purely Islamic nature and cannot be refuted. The crucial question: why the Islamic invaders did what they did can be clearly seen by reading the evidence. The evidence basically consists of Muslims glorifying their heinous tasks by invoking the name of Allah and verses from the Koran. They justify their barbaric deeds of loot, plunder, rape, torture, murder and destruction by saying that they do Allah’s bidding and for doing so their reward will be paradise with countless houries, untouched young boys, rivers of wine, variety of fruits and abundant water. (To understand more clearly why such a paradise attracted Muslims read my article, The X-Rated Paradise of Islam). In my preceding articles on this topic I have presented the vast amount of literary evidence which prove to us that the Mosques and other Muslim structures present today in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh were originally Hindu places of worship. The greedy and the lustful Islamic invaders inspired by the Koran and out of utter disrespect looted these sacred places and converted them into Islamic structures. These existing Islamic structures are harsh reminders of the bloody Islamic invasions and the oppression, torment and torture that these invaders brought with them. This article will focus on the epigraphic evidence associated with the Islamic structures existing in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. All the proofs that I have presented in my other articles concerning this topic have been taken from purely Islamic sources and as this epigraphic evidence constitutes of inscriptions left by Muslims themselves the evidence presented in this article is also of purely Islamic nature. Some of the inscriptions on the mosques have been published by the Archaeological Survey of India in its Epigraphia Indica-Arabic and Persian Supplement, an annual which appeared first in 1907-08 as Epigraphia Indo-Moslemica. I have selected only a few inscriptions which have been thoroughly researched by the following: Arun Shourie, Harsh Narain, Jay Dubashi, Ram Swarup and Sita Ram Goel. They have presented their research work in two volumes titled, Hindu Temples: What Happened To Them. The following is the narration of the “pious performance” by Muslims of plundering and converting Hindu temples to mosques and other Islamic structures.
Name of the structure: Quwwat al-Islam Masjid Location: Delhi in UttarPradesh Inscription: “This fort was conquered and the Jami Masjid built in the year 587 by the Amir(*), the great, the gloriuous commander of the Army, Qutub-ud-daula wad-din, the Amir-ul-umara Aibeg, the slave of the Sultan, may Allah strengthen his helperes. The materials of 27 idol temples, on each of which 2,000,000 Delhiwals (**) had been spent were used in the construction of the mosque. ” *The Amir mentioned above was Qutubud-Din Aibak, slave of Muhammed Ghori. **”Delhiwal” was a high denomination coin current at that time in Delhi .
Name of the structure: Mansuri Masjid Location: Vijapur in Gujrat Inscription:
“The Blessed and Exalted Allah says, ‘And verily, mosques are for Allah only; hence invoke not anyone else with Allah. ‘This edifice was originally built by the infidels. After the advent of Islam, it was converted into a mosque. Sermon was delivered here for sixty-seven years. Due to the sedition of the infidels, it was again destroyed. When during the reign of the Sultan of the time, Ahmad, the affairs of each Iqta attained magnificence, Bahadur, the Sarkhail, once again carried out repairs. Through the generosity of Divine munificence, it became like new. ”
Name of the structure: Masjid at Manvi Location: Manvi in Karnataka Inscription:
“Praise be to Allah that by the decree of the Parvardigar, a mosque has been converted out of a temple as a sign of religion in the reign of the world- conquering emperor, the Sultan who is the asylum of the Faith and the possessor of the crown, who’s kingdom is young, viz. Firuz Shah Bahmani, who is the cause of Exuberant spring in the garden of religion, Adu’l-Fath the king who conquered. After the victory of the emperor, the chief of chiefs, Safdar (the valiant commander) of the age, received the fort. The builder of this noble place of prayer is Muhammad Zahir Aqchi, the pivot of the Faith. He constructed in the year 809 from the Migration of the Chosen (prophet Muhammdad) this Ka’ba like momento. ”
Name of the structure: Mausoleum of Shykh ‘Abdullah Shah Changal Location: Dhar in Madhya Pradesh Inscription:”The centre became Muhammadan first by him(*) (and) all the banners of religion were spread. . . This lion-man came from the centre of religion to this old temple with a large force. He broke the images of the false deities, and turned the idol temple into a mosque. When Rai Bhoj saw this, through wisdom he embraced Islam with the family of his brave warriors(**). This quarter becameilluminated by the light of the Muhammadan law, and the customs of the infidels became obsolete and abolished. “
*Shykh ‘Abdullah Shah Changal **In this case the Hindu King was Bhoj II and during his reign Jalalu’d-Din Khalji (AD 1290-1296) of Delhi invaded Malwa. Changal was the Muslim missionarywho accompanied Khalji’s army. This army after plundering and looting the kingdom of Bhoj II converted a Hindu temple into a mosque and forced the ruler and his subjects to accept Islam.
Name of the structure: Jami’ Masjid Location: Malan in Gujrat Inscription: “. . . (The Prophet), on him be peace, says ‘He who builds a mosque in the world, the Exalted Allah builds for him a palace in Paradise . ‘ In the auspicious time of the government and peaceful time of Mahmud Shah, son of Muhammad Shah, the sultan, the Jami’, mosque was constructed on the hill of the fort of Malun (or Malwan) by Khan-i-Azam Ulugh Khan. . . at the request of the thandar Kabir, (son of Diya), the building was constructed by the son of Ulugh Khan who is magnimonius, just, generous, brave and who suppressed the wrteched infidels. He eradicated the idol-houses and mine of infidelity, along with the idols. . . with the edge of his sword, and made ready this edifice. . . He made its walls and doors out of the idols; the back of every stone became the place for prostration of the believer. . . ”
Name of the structure: Jami’ Masjid Location: Amod in Gujrat Inscription: “Allah and His grace. When divine favour was bestowed on Khalil Shah, he constructed the Jami’ Masjid for the decoration of Islam; he ruined the idol-house and temple of the polytheists, (and) completed the Masjid and pulpit in its place. Without doubt, his building was accepted by Allah. ”
Name of the structure: Shrine of Shah Madar Location: Narwar in Mdhya pradesh Inscription:”Dilawar Khan, the chief among the king’s viceroys, caused this mosque to built which is like a place of shelter for the favourites. Infidelity has been subdued, and Islam has triumphed because of him. The idols have bowed to him and the temples have been razed to the ground along with their foundations, and mosques and worship houses are flowing with riches. ”
Name of structure: Hamman Darwaza Masjid Location: Jaunpur in Uttar Pradesh Inscription: “Thanks by the guidance of Everlasting and the Living Allah, this house of infidelity became the niche of prayer. As a reward for that, the Generous Lord constructed an abode for the builder in paradise. . . ”
Name of structure: Jami Masjid Location: Ghoda in Maharashtra Inscription: “O Allah O Muhammed ! O Ali ! When Mir Muhammed Zaman made up his mind, he opened the door of prosperity on himself by his own hand. He demolished thirty-three idol temples and by divine grace laid the foundation of a building in the abode of predition. ”
Name of structure: Gachinala Masjid Location: Kurnool District of Andhra Pradesh Inscription: “He is Allah, may be glorified. . During the august rule of. . . Muhammed Shah, there was a well established idol-house in Kuhmum. . . Muhammed Salih. . . razed to the ground, the edifice of the idol-house and broke the idols in a manly fashion. He constructed on its site a suitable mosque, towering above the building of all. ”
The above was a presentation of inscriptions on mosques and other Islamic structures in India . These inscriptions, as you clearly read, glorify and justify the acts of the barbaric Muslim invaders by invoking Allah and the Koran. Thus this leads us to the conclusion that Islam openly supports the criminal acts of loot, plunder, rape, murder, torment, torture and destruction!! More of the epigraphic evidence will follow in the next article on this topic. Note: Works of Arun Shourie, Harsh Narain, Jay Dubashi and Sita Ram Goel have been used in this article.
Faith, fact and fiction
OPED | Thursday, October 21, 2010 Prafull Goradia
[History and ASI records prove Hindu temples have been vandalised time and again by Muslim rulers and invaders. Will Muslims consider returning all those mandirs to Hindus in exchange of the Babri Masjid? ]
The recent judgement of the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court on the Ram Janmabhoomi has been criticised by several Muslim leaders and a self-styled secularist as one based on faith and not facts. To insist on facts, when it comes to religion, is a contradiction in terms. That Virgin Mary was the mother of Jesus Christ is a belief inspired by faith and we respect it. Similarly, we do not question that Prophet Mohammed ascended to heaven from the Dome of Rock.
The short-sightedness of the Muslim institutions wanting to appeal to the Supreme Court against the High Court’s recent judgement on Ram Janmabhoomi is obvious. In contrast, recall the vision of Sir Sikander Hayat Khan, the distinguished Premier of undivided Punjab : The Muslim League had sponsored the Punjab Muslim Mosques Protection Bill of 1938. The intention was primarily to secure the restoration of the Shaheed Ganj mosque, which was being used as a gurudwara.
As stated by Professor Coupland, the Bill was expected to create a grave political crisis for Sir Sikander’s Unionist Party. However, he still stood firm against the Bill and stated openly in the Punjab Assembly that the enactment of the legislation would provoke a retaliatory action in other provinces in respect of the numerous non-Muslim places of worship, which had passed into Muslim hands and had become sites of important Muslim holy places such as, the Dargah at Ajmer or the Quwwat-ul-Islam Mosque near Qutb Minar.
Significantly, the Council of the Muslim League approved of Sir Sikander’s contention and the Punjab Governor accordingly, did not permit the Bill to be introduced. That left Barkat Ali, the sponsor of the Bill, disappointed. The incident is quoted from Modern Muslim India and the Birth of Pakistan by Mr SM Ikram.
As a Hindu, I welcome the insistence on facts. I could go to the extent of offering the Muslims the Babri masjid back provided their leaders agree to give back all the places of worship, which were proven mandirs and were converted into masjids by invaders or Muslim rulers.
I have seen and photographed several mosques whose walls carry integral carvings of Lord Ganesh. The Quwwat-ul-Islam in Delhi and the Adina Mosque near Malda in West Bengal are two such examples. The Jama Masjid in Vidisha near Bhopal is a veritable museum of Hindu idols. The Rudra Mahalaya Complex at Siddhpur in Gujarat with its 11 temples used as Jami Masjid is another interesting example. From within the precincts of the mosque, Hindu idols were excavated by the Archaeological Survey of India in 1979, but were buried back at the insistence of Muslim leaders. This incidence was reported by the Fourth National Minorities Commission Report, 1983. According to Alexander Cunningham, the legendary founder of ASI, it was the resplendent kingdom of Kannauj, which was later destroyed by Muhammad Ghori in 12th century.
In his Mathura : A District Memoir, FS Growse has recorded his exhaustive survey of Brajbhoomi. He was so overwhelmed by the vandalism that he visited the area repeatedly and recorded it in detail. To quote: “Thanks to Muhammadan intolerance, there is not a single building of any antiquity either in Mathura or, its environs. Its most famous temple — that dedicated to Kesava Deva (Krishna) — was destroyed in 1669, the eleventh year of the reign of Aurangzeb or Alamgir. The mosque (idgah) erected on its ruins is a building of little architectural value. ”
Over two centuries after the desecration, Growse felt that “of all the sacred places in India, none enjoys a greater popularity than the capital of Braj, the holy city of Mathura . For nine months in the year, festival follows upon festival in rapid succession and the ghats and temples are daily thronged with new troops of way worn pilgrims”.
Today, Balkrishna is worshipped in a little room, which appears like a servant quarter attached to the back of the idgah. Definitely, any visitor, whether a devotee or otherwise, would feel pathetic.
The birthplace of Krishna was vandalised repeatedly. It started with Mahmud of Ghazni in 1017 and went on till Aurangzeb’s rule in 17th century. Historian Sri Ram Sharma in his The Religious Policy of the Mughal Emperors, first published in 1940, wrote: “Then came the turn of the temple of Keshav Rai at Mathura built at a cost of `33,00,000 by Rao Bir Singh Bundela during the reign of Jahangir. It had excited the envy of many Muslims who, however, had not Aurangzeb’s power. It had been built after the style of the famous temple at Bindraban which Man Singh had built at a cost of `5,00,000. But Bir Singh had improved upon his model and spent more than six times as much as Man Singh had lavished on his shrine at Bindraban. It had become a centre of pilgrimage for the whole of India . The idols, studded with precious stones and adorned with gold work, were all taken to Agra and there buried under the steps of Jahanara’s mosque. The temple was levelled to the ground and a mosque was ordered to be built on the site to mark the acquisition of religious merit by the emperor. ” Historian Sharma has relied on Maasiri-i-Alamgiri.
The Russians at the end of their conquest of Warsaw had built an Orthodox church, which stood for a hundred years until World War I. It was demolished after the Polish takeover. At the same site, the Poles rebuilt their Catholic church. The incident was described by Sir Arnold Toynbee in the first Azad Memorial lecture delivered in Delhi . He then went on to comment on the irony of independent India tolerating the idgah over Krishna Janmabhoomi and the two tall mosques built on the ghats of Benares.
Ours being a peaceful society, Indians should avoid desecration. A fair and square exchange of the Babri edifice for all the mandirs turned into masjids, which authentic records prove, should be acceptable to all.
ॐ Hinduu Nation ॐ 