Giga Democides against Hindus and the Dhimmitude of Harvard University

Giga Democides against Hindus and the Dhimmitude of Harvard University

G.P. Srinivasan

Hindu Voice, Vol.10, Issue No.10, January 2012, Page 18.

 

The first Jihad came to India exactly 1299 years ago merely four years after the last day of prophet Mohamed on earth. Mohammed Bin Kasim invaded Sind in 712 AD. Denying Islam’s destructive role in Indian history is similar to the attempts made by some European writers who deny the Nazi Holocaust history and the role of European negationists who applaud Hitler’s reign and deny its horrors. Indian negationists eulogize Islamic rule and deny its billion fold murders and the catastrophe it wrought in Indian Social Cultural, Economic, Political and religious life. This article exposes the Giga Democides, carried out against Hindus, for 1324 years, by successive Islamic & Christian Governments.

 

According to a recent definition, Democide = Death by Government; or Successive governments; hostile to people whom they rule. The extermination of people is carried out over very long periods over large populations, over large areas, to the point of their total annihilation of the entire population.

 

The WTC 9/11 and after: The United States of America faced Jihad in its own soil for the first time only on September 11, 2001. Based on the long 1300 years of Hindu experience in facing jihads, the WTC attacks will not be last one on American soil. Take for example Somanatha Temple on the Gujarat coast of India. It was a major Hindu Pilgrim center. The destruction of Somanatha Temple is the case in point and should well serve as benchmark for the study of Islamic iconoclasm in India and the lessons it holds for America. The Somanatha was the WTC of India located on the western tip of India.

 

Perhaps it would do some good to America and World, if Mr. Obama educates himself on Islam, especially after his Cairo address in June 2009.

 

THE SACK OF SOMANATH (417 HIJRI 1026 CE)

It is indeed noticeable that after Somanatha expedition (417 Hijri1026 CE), a deed fired the imagination of the Islamic world, caliphal-Quadir Billah himself celebrated the victory with great éclat. He sent Muhammad Bin Kasim a very complimentary letter giving him the title Kahf-Ud-Daula WA-al- Islam, and formerly called him as the ruler of India. The world has not largely heard about these atrocities. Somanatha was rebuilt repeatedly four times in the following centuries, when the Hindus could get some peace. Over the centuries to the horror of Hindus every time it was rebuilt, it was destroyed by Islamic hordes. Only after Indian independence in 1947 could Hindus think of rebuilding it. With the leadership of Home Minister Sardar Patel – called as the Iron man of India – a man of strong resolve – could the Temple be rebuilt and was inaugurated in 1954 as the symbol of Indian National pride. But the compulsive Hindu hater Jawaharlal Nehru did not attend the inaugural function.

 

Timor Lang said: “My objective of coming to Hindustan has been to accomplish two things. The first was to war with the infidels, the enemies of Mohammedan religion; and by religious warfare to acquire some claim to reward in life to come. The other aim was that the army of Islam might gain something by plundering the wealth and valuables of the infidels: plunder in war is lawful as their mother’s milk to mussalman’s who war for their faith. He killed 100000 Hindus in one day. An estimated 60 to 100 million Hindus perished in the last 1300 years in Islamic Jihads”.

 

“Negationism in India – Concealing the Record of Islam” by Dr. Koenraad Elst demonstrates that there exists a ‘prohibition’ of criticism of Islam and a denial of its ‘historic crimes against humanity’ that amounts to censorship, comparing it to Denial of Holocaust by Hitler and Nazis. ‘Holocaust-Deniers’ in Europe often keep all evidence out of view or deny the existence of such evidence. They are severely dealt by the State Laws. Many historians and Nazi sympathizers who attempted to white wash Nazi history have landed in jail. (Incidentally Dr. Sugatha Bose, Dr. Michael Witzel belongs to the Negationists school of Historians.) When one compares, the sheer number of Hindu Victims far exceeds that of Jews to Nazi Genocide.

 

Historians of the Aligarh school (e.g. Irfan Habib) or Indian Marxists (e.g. Romila Thapar, R.C. Sharma, Harbans Mukhia, Champakalakshmi, Pande) have resorted to heavy distortions and history rewriting.

 

It is only very recently Romila Thapar accepted and retracted with regret the colonial Aryan invasion theory. It would have seen a natural death several decades in advance had it not been for the scaffoldings erected by Stalinist historians of JNU and therefore, in 1982 the National Council of Educational Research and Training issued a directive for the rewriting of schoolbooks.

 

Looking back into the History, documenting the Genocides committed in India could be daunting task, but not impossible and by using regression analysis one could arrive at figures, unpleasant: the victims could run into hundreds of millions, if not billions.

 

According to Bangladeshi author Tasleema Nasreen in 1941, the Muslims were 70.3 Percent of the Bangladeshi population, while Hindus were 28.3 percent. In 1951, the Muslims were 76.9 % and Hindus were 22.0 percent. In 1961, the Muslims were 80.4 percent, Hindus 18.5 percent. In 1974, there were 85.4 percent Muslims and 12.1 percent Hindus. In 1991, the Muslims were 87.4 percent and the Hindus 12.6 percent.

 

What do we understand from this? That every year the number of Muslims is increasing, while that of the Hindus decreasing. What is happening to the Hindus? Where are they going? If the government insists that they are not migrating, then how will they explain away the figures of the census? Do you have the latest about the new census? Apparently Hindus and Muslims will not be counted separately. Because Hindus are dwindling so rapidly they may as well be clubbed with the Muslims, instead of being considered a separate entity (26 Lajja p.189, penguin 1993.)

 

Prof. K.S. Lal suggests a calculation in his book Growth of Muslim Population in Medieval India, which estimates that between the years 1000 AD and 1500 AD the population of Hindus decreased by 80 million.

 

Now keeping in tune with the Islamic philosophy of Jihad that says land belongs to Allah, the Muslims in India are claiming the destroyed property of Infidels, with the Power of Gulf money. By that logic of Muslims even the WTC towers I & II belong to Allah and therefore, Muslims the natural heirs.

 

Far away from the deserts of Middle East, in South India, the World famous Srirangam Temple, with the official HQ of Sri Vaishnavism had borne the brunt waves of Islamic onslaught. For centuries it was under attack and then recovered.  12000 Hindus were beheaded.

 

The tales of sack of Srirangam cannot be complete without the mention of the sacrifice of the temple courtesan. Unable to bear the harassment of the devotees by the Muslims, she enticed the Muslim chief, took him up a temple tower in the east, and in the pretext of showing him a famous icon and a hidden treasure trove from there, she pushed him down and killed him. Scared that she will be tortured by the Muslims as a result of her deed, she threw herself also down.

 

Tippu, the son of Haider Ali, invaded the Carnatic in 1790 C.E. with his mammoth army, causing considerable havoc and destruction. He stationed his army in the temple for 6 days, and demanded 100000 gold pieces for his army from the temple authorities. The demand was refused, at which the Sultan turned wild. Fortunately however, Tippu had to flee for his own safety before he could wreak his vengeance upon the temple.

 

Hindus must quickly unite, and tackle the menace in a war footing before they become exiled in their own land. Hindus have no place to go, but jump into the oceans. Please refer to the attacks on Hindu Students in summer 2009 in Australia and Canada, and the sack of Dr.Subramanian Swamy from Harvard in the winter of 2011 must be seen as a punishment for attempting to unite Hindus against Saudi Wahabism + Pakistani + ISI + home grown Islamic Jihads against Hindus in India. The door shown to Dr.Subramanian Swami by Harvard should be seen as arm twisting tactic by Saudi money bags against Hindu resistance to continued Islamic Jihads, against Hindus which Drew Gilpin Faust, a Historian herself, (the President, Harvard University), has failed to see in the Historic Context, in which Dr. Swamy wrote that article.

 

Dr Faust instead of applying her brain, did not invite Dr. Swami for an explanation, but surrendered to the powerful Islamic and right wing Indian Christian lobby there. Two right wing Indian, born again Christian Students, Umang Kumar and Sanjay Pinto, studying in Harvard, generated the petition against Swamy, without taking into account the Islamic terror that took place the previous day in Bombay.

 

This shows how Indian minorities abroad are  insensitive against attack on Hindus by Islamic Terror and how they care a damn against the killing of majority Hindus in India, by Minority Muslims. This also shows how Minority Christians, well entrenched as they are in India are networked abroad, work in close with Imperial Americans.

 

With the death of 25 Pakistani Soldiers in the NATO, drone attack in Nov 2011, and all time low relations with Pakistan, and the US exiting Paki airbase, it is time for Hindus to take up the issue of Dr. Swamy with Harvard and also with the state Department. Some professors of Harvard have a record of writing porno stuff against Hindus. This must be made into a dossier and complaints must be made against them in India and USA.

 

The fiscal income of the university in the year 2010 was 3.7 billion, and expenditure was 3.7 billion, (something is terribly wrong). The US economy is in doldrums and indebted to China heavily, and sources tell that Harvard University has been receiving funds from Saudi Arabia for its Islamic centre. Is the Harvard bending over backwards to accommodate Islamic interests?