Category: Awakening

On the Judges who Judge Monks and Saadhus.

Technically, a secular constitution has no jurisdiction on deciding how a Hindu saadhu should behave or not behave because each has (has to have) a spiritual master whom each saadhu us surrendered. They are a part of the Hindu/Vedic society, and they control their senses much more than a common citizen does. They are spiritual guides for the society, even for politicians; and some are protectors of Dharma as well.

Many saadus do nishkaam bhakti karma to please God or their guru or for the society. To do that bhakti seva, they do need resources and money. Therefore, the Hindus and the courts need to understand this point and do not make any judgements out of the ignorance of dharma practice.

To judge a Hindu saadhu, the court need to invite the head guru of the math or sampradaya to which the saadnu belongs, and take advise from the head guru before making any judgement. This process is the same as in worldly affairs, that when a court/judge is not competent in the matter of a judgement, they invite neutral experts to provide them information that helps to make a right judgement.

Also remember that a naga saadhu or a sanyaasi considers him/herself as a dead person in worldly affairs. He simply lives for his and the society’s spiritual uplifting. Being so he does not fear death or injuries. He is guided by noble spiritual goals for his and nation’s life. Also, he could be ferocious fighter alone or in group. Just as Shaolin monks are respected by Buddhists, the Hindus and all should respect Hindu saadhus and sanyasis.

The courts/judges in the past have opened courts in the middle of night, out of fear from the terrorists, just to serve the terrorists and anti-nationals. That is wrong and cowardice. In contrast, it is noble to quickly provide justice to saadhus and naga saadhus and nihangas because they live to uphold Dharma, Sanaatan Dharma that is universal religion for mankind.

To see the Hindu Dharma and other Abrahamic religions in the same category is as wrong as seeing a coconut and a poisonous fruit in the same category. The judges need to understand this point well, and so the Hindus.

— Now the other argument by the judges at this time is that they have to treat all the religions and dharma in the same way. That means the constitution is defective and anti-majority, and so anti-Hindu. Therefore, the  Hindus law-makers need to fix this issue as soon as possible. –

Hindustan was divided in 1949 due to the threat from Islam that has forcibly invaded in Hindustan 1000 years ag when we gave land, treasury, and army to islaam for peace. Thenafter, by default the rest of the Hindustan is a Hindu State; so it officially needs to be declared so where all the anti-Vedic ideologies or majhabs will be illegal.

Why keep Islaam legal in Hindustan when islaam divided the nation?? —

The word “secular” was illegally inserted in the constitution in Indira’s emergency time without any democratic due process. Forcing “secularism’ on Hindus is like painting sky blue. Which is not needed because a Hindu is inherently respectful to all faiths that respect Hindu Dharma and culture.

The anti-Hindu Congress also removed pictures of Hindu Gods from the constitution illegal; so these pictures need to be inserted back in the constitution. Bottom Line: Hindustan has been the home nation for millenniums and the Hindus have the birthright to dominate over internal anti-Dharma and anti-national forces.

॥ वयम् राष्ट्रे जागृयाम् ॥

jaya sri krtishna!