Category: Articles

From: yogesh saxena < >

गो हत्या का सद्भाव

http://vishwajeetsingh1008|blogspot|in/2011/04/blog-post_2050.html

 

15 अगस्त 1947 को भारत के आजाद होने पर देश के कोने – कोने से लाखों पत्र और तार प्रायः सभी जागरूक व्यक्तियों तथा सार्वजनिक संस्थाओं द्वारा भारतीय संविधान परिषद के अध्यक्ष डॉ० राजेन्द्र प्रसाद के माध्यम से गांधी जी को भेजे गये जिसमें उन्होंने मांग की थी कि अब देश स्वतन्त्र हो गया हैं अतः गौहत्या को बन्द करा दो । तब पाकपिता गांधी ने कहा, “राजेन्द्र बाबू ने मुझको बताया कि उनके यहाँ करीब 50 हजार पोस्ट कार्ड , 25 – 30 हजार पत्र और कई हजार तार आ गये हैं। हिन्दुस्तान में गौ – हत्या रोकने का कोई कानून बन ही नहीं सकता । इसका मतलब तो जो हिन्दू नहीं हैं , उनके साथ जबरदस्ती करना होगा| जो आदमी अपने आप गौकुशी नहीं रोकना चाहते , उनके साथ मैं कैसे जबरदस्ती करूँ कि वह ऐसा करें।

 

इसलिए मैं तो यह कहूँगा कि तार और पत्र भेजने का सिलसिला बन्द होना चाहिये इतना पैसा इन पर फैंक देना मुनासिब नहीं हैं । मैं तो अपनी मार्फत सारे हिन्दुस्तान को यह सुनाना चाहता हूँ कि वे सब तार और पत्र भेजना बन्द कर दें । भारतीय यूनियन कांग्रेस में मुसलमान , ईसाई आदि सभी लोग रहते हैं । अतः मैं तो यही सलाह दूँगा कि विधान – परिषद् पर इसके लिये जोर न डाला जाये । ( पुस्तक – ‘ धर्मपालन ‘ भाग – दो , प्रकाशक – सस्ता साहित्य मंडल , नई दिल्ली , पृष्ठ – 135 )—— [[[  it means ghaandhii ( GANDHI ) was anti – hinduu to start with —-  ]]]

 

गौहत्या पर कानूनी प्रतिबन्ध को अनुचित बताते हुए इसी आशय के विचार गांधी जी ने प्रार्थना सभा में दिये –

 

” हिन्दुस्तान में गौ-हत्या रोकने का कोई कानून बन ही नहीं सकता । इसका मतलब तो जो हिन्दू नहीं हैं उनके साथ जबरदस्ती करना होगा । ” – ‘ प्रार्थना सभा ‘ ( 25 जुलाई 1947 )

 

—- [[[  what a  ANTI – HINDUU gaandhii is —  ]]]

 

हिन्दुस्तान ( 26 जुलाई 1947 ) , हरिजन एवं हरिजन सेवक ( 26 जुलाई 1947 )

 

अपनी 4 नवम्बर 1947 की प्रार्थना सभा में गांधी जी ने फिर कहा कि –

 

” भारत कोई हिन्दू धार्मिक राज्य नहीं हैं , इसलिए हिन्दुओं के धर्म को दूसरों पर जबरदस्ती नहीं थोपा जा सकता । मैं गौ सेवा में पूरा विश्वास रखता हूँ , परन्तु उसे कानून द्वारा बन्द नहीं किया जा सकता । ”

—- [[[ what a विश्वासघात gaandhiiis !!! —- ]]]

 

 

( दिल्ली डायरी , पृष्ठ 134 से 140 तक )

इससे स्पष्ट हैं कि गांधी जी की गौरक्षा के प्रति कोई आस्था नहीं थी । वह केवल हिन्दुओं की भावनाओं का शौषण करने के लिए बनावटी तौर पर ही गौरक्षा की बात किया करते थे , इसलिए उपयुक्त समय आने पर देश की सनातन आस्थाओं के साथ विश्वासघात कर गये गांधी ।

 

7 नवम्बर 1966 को गोपाष्टमी के दिन गौरक्षा से सम्बन्धित संस्थाओं ने संयुक्त रूप से संसद भवन के सामने एक विशाल प्रदर्शन का आयोजन किया जिसमें तत्कालीन सरकार से गौहत्या बन्दी का कानून बनाने की मांग की गई । इस प्रदर्शन में भारत के प्रत्येक राज्य से करीब 10 – 12 लाख गौभक्त नर – नारी , साधु – संत और छोटे – छोटे बालक – बालिकाएं भी गौमाता की हत्या बन्द कराने इस धर्मयुद्ध में आये थे ।

 

उस समय इंदिरा गांधी प्रधानमंत्री पद पर थी और गुलजारिलाल नन्दा गृहमंत्री थे । श्री नन्दा जी ने प्रधानमंत्री इंदिरा गांधी को परामर्श दिया कि इतनी बडी संख्या में देशभर के सर्व विचारों के जनता की मांग गौहत्या बन्दी का कानून स्वीकार करें । तब इंदिरा गांधी ने कठोरता से कहा ” गौहत्या बन्दी का कानून बनाने से मुसलमान और ईसाई समाज कांग्रेस से नाराज हो जायेंगे । गौहत्या बन्दी का कानून नहीं बन सकता । ” इंदिरा के न मानने पर गुलजारिलाल नन्दा ने अपने गृहमंत्री पद से त्यागपत्र दे दिया और गौभक्त भारतीयों के इतिहास में अमर हो गये ।

 

उधर इंदिरा गांधी ने प्रदर्शन खत्म कराने के लिए निहत्थे अहिंसक गौभक्तों प्रदर्शनकारियों पर गोली चलवा दी जिसमें अनेकों साधुओं व गौभक्तों की हत्याएँ हुई । इंदिरा गांधी ने यह नृशंश हत्याकाण्ड गौपाष्टमी के पर्व पर कराया था अतः विधि का विधान देखिये कि – इंदिरा गांधी की हत्या भी गौपाष्टमी को हुई थी , संजय गांधी की दुर्घटना में मृत्यु भी अष्टमी को हुई , राजीव गांधी की हत्या भी अष्टमी को हुई , गौहत्या के महापाप से गांधी – नेहरू परिवार का नाश हो गया ।

 

स्वतन्त्रता प्राप्ति के इतने दिन बाद भी राष्ट्रीय स्तर पर गौहत्या बन्दी का कानून न बन पाना भारतीयों के लिए बडे ही दुःख और अपमान की बात हैं । हे परमात्मा , नेहरू के वंशजों और गांधी के अनुयायी इन राजनेताओं को सद्बुद्धि दो । भारत की प्राणाधार गौमाता की हत्या बन्दी का कानून सम्प्रदायवाद की भावना से उठकर शीघ्र बने यहीं प्रार्थना हैं ।

 

– विश्वजीतसिंह

 

 

From: Rashtra1947@…

2 OCTOBER 2012. Please copy, print or publish freely.

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi

By Kuru

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, the man who selflessly served the interests of the two great imperial powers, ISLAM and BRITAIN, was born at Porbandar, Western India, on 2 October 1869 to wealthy Hindu parents.

Early experiences in London shaped his mind and mentality for the rest of his life. He had gone to England in his impressionable years and though his parents had spent a fortune to see him qualify as a barrister in England, his stay there was not a happy one. He was not accepted as equal, coming to the heart of Imperial Britain from a disdained slave colony. In streets he was subjected to racist taunts and called “Blackie”, “Nigger”, even “Baboon”.

This had lasting effect on his personality and outlook. He came to see Britain as a “lion” and himself as a “goat”. So, the “goat” could only use the weapon of non violence and protest by “fasting unto death” and peaceful unarmed marches and shouting slogans.

After return from South Africa, where again he was insulted and locked up unceremoniously, abused and beaten up by White men, he was convinced that armed struggle was futile and, so, put the country on the road of long suffering.

That was just what the British rulers had wanted. None was a better ally than Gandhi to pacify and disarm the slaves and ensure peace in their vast labour colony.

With his own safety and popularity ensured by the rulers he felt brave enough to condemn all the Hindu warriors of the past and the brave Hindu patriots, calling Shivaji and Guru Gobind Singhji “misguided patriots”. What could please the please the MUSLIMS and the EUROPEANS more?

It is directly due to “Bapu” Gandhi that the Punjab Lion is dead and the Bengal Tiger is in cage. From Lok Sabha in Delhi to the State Assemblies in Kerala and Tamil Nadu we see only “GOAT” Gandhi’s statues, followers, institutions, schools, roads, localities and towns named after him, all the time throwing ice cold water on the warm blooded onlookers and any sign of “Shakti” and “Gaurav” as Hindus.

Ideologically and politically, the whole of Gandhian Bharat is a treeless flat land with signs posted on frontiers on all sides,

“COME IN. PLUNDER AND CONVERT FREELY.”

That is what the foreigners are doing- from Italy to Bangladesh.

For a government that wishes to drive the people like a herd of cattle a super hero figure like Gandhi is the ideal psychological tool. And logically this is the tool the ruling and fooling establishment are using vigorously, rigorously and non stop, since 1947. The Hindu nation once dominant from Afghanistan to Malaysia is like a flock of submissive sheep today, with the key of the abattoir in the hand of Italian born Sonia Maino-Gandhi. She has yet to see a ram among the one billion ewes standing up, to show her the sign, “QUIT INDIA!” Many Gandhian ewes are busy at work at Bollywood, pleasing all the KHANS in the absence of a Hindu hero.

Gandhi’s Hindu nation imagines like the man himself, being continuously kicked and stoned from all sides. That has led to the cocoon mentality of today when the Indians being expelled from Uganda or beaten up in Fiji or the Buddhist temples being burnt down in Bangladesh cause no ripple in the unconscious Hindu body in Bharat. Even the occupation of North Kashmir was not able to bring about a fierce reaction to liberate the territory.

India that remains deep frozen in the crippling Gandhian jelly of tolerance and appeasement is now bleeding profusely. We see sharp and long daggers of corruption, bureaucracy and minority-ism being thrust into every pour of her skin. Soon she will violently IMPLODE with foreseeable loss of life and property. Only a post revolution new Bharat in even smaller area than now, will emerge as Hindusthan with the guts to declare itself “HINDU RASHTRA” after shedding her gangrene infested peripheries.

—————————-

Defeated, disgraced and dishonourable leader

Any devotee of M K GANDHI, the emaciated Weakling who discouraged manliness and demoralised the nation into unconditional surrender and died an ignominious death at the hands of a patriot, must be either brainwashed, bullied or downright stupid (be-waqoof) to call the man “freedom fighter”.

What was the freedom of Delhi if Lahore, Karachi, Quetta, Peshawar and Dhaka were betrayed into slavery? Were they not integral to India like Mumbai, Kanpur and Chennai? Do we see a woman happy whose daughter is abducted and son killed by bandits? Yet Gandhi’s India doesn’t even mention the word “Partition” nor the cancer (MUSLIMS) that killed Akhand Bharat! Instead of confronting the enemy with courage he went on the worst ever misleading suicidal mission by chanting “Hindu-Muslim Bhai Bhai!”

Hundreds of millions of Hindus, worshipping Gandhi, are still stuck to the same suicidal mentality like brain dead zombies. The nation has lost vigour and independence. Our own great religious and spiritual heritage, culture and traditions have been suppressed or subordinated to those from the Middle East. Gandhi never looked at the ruins of those great temples in Ayodhya, Mathura, Varanasi and Somnath, mortally fearing those who look towards Mecca while praying, and call themselves descendants of Babur and Aurangzeb and are quick with dagger and sword.

Thinkers call it cognitive seizure of the great Hindu nation, still being misled, misruled and robbed by the Italians. Others regard it self-negation. Some have identified it as a secret wish for collective death due to centuries long slavery and degradation resulting in genetic deterioration and deeply embedded inferiority complex. Despite 65 years since Partition the pacified supine Hindu nation is still giving rides to the corrupt “Hindu bashing” rulers and foreign oriented descendants of previous invaders and tyrants who are circulating as venom and cancer in the arteries of the nation.

No other nation on earth has the counterpart of our Gandhi who is seen as the sleep inducing agent for the dying patient who is unable to open his eyes or move his hands. We have become incapable of imagining as to what our Hindusthan would have been like today had we replaced Gandhian slavish appeasing mentality with the vigour, dynamism, pride and dignity of Shivaji, Guru Gobind Singhji and Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose on 15 August 1947, the day of eternal defeat, shame and surrenders. Today, due to ‘Gandhi induced’ disability and invalidity the orphaned Hindu nation, including the Supreme Commander and the Prime Minister, is so demoralised, lacking self-confidence and unity, that our Bharat is looking up to a nondescript imported Italian born female of unknown pedigree, mental orientation, core loyalties and background, to guide the vast country of one billion inhabitants from Kashmir to Kerala. The country’s Parliament, President, Prime Minister and the top General begin their day after paying homage to her ancestors and swearing loyalty to her. Is there any other country on earth so low down and flat, being trampled upon, exploited and misled by a FOREIGN finger, like our Hindusthan? Only the brave Hindus who have escaped the “Gandhian cage” can go abroad and see the pride and patriotism of even tiny countries like Denmark, Austria and Lithuania to compare with our own.

Gandhi surrendered everything even before the battle for Hindusthan had begun and instantly went silent (“died”) when his Hindusthan (“Akhand Bharat”) was attacked, hacked and bled to death by the so-called “indigenous” Muslims, and Lahore and Dhaka disappeared from the map of India overnight.

The enemy of Gandhi and his India, the former President of All-India Congress Party, Mohammed Ali Jinnah, demanded a separate country for the INDIAN Muslims and threatened civil war. He prevailed. Gandhi was “demolished” but survived to live in shame.

EVIL TRIUMPHED OVER GOOD. Gandhi was the cause of the triumph of Evil in India.

“Bapu” Gandhi, whose statues stand across Partitioned India, reminds all the world of the Hindus’ collective cowardice and love of slavery. He watched in horror, listened in terror, and fell flat on his nose without even whispering, “I charge you, Brother JINN, with High Treason.”

Jinn had already exposed his Islamic sword, to frighten Gandhi, and his loyalty towards his own land of birth. JINN was born an Indian, died a Pakistani. He found Gandhi detestable, repugnant, loathsome and repulsive and thought the same of his Hindusthan, too. He couldn’t wait to take his Pakistan out of India and live away from Gandhi.

Like a docile and tame Hindu Gandhi became “secular” in order to escape being abused, beaten up or boiled & roasted alive (Hindus’ fate in earlier centuries). Lacking conviction & pride (“Gaurav”) in his own Hindu religion he did not admonish his own son, Hira Lal, **who rejected Sri Krishna and the Hindu religion, and embraced Mohammed & Islam with big love.

Mohandas Karamchand GANDHI is called the “FATHER” OF PAKISTAN”. His cowardice and frequent “fasts unto death” had created a dangerous political VACUUM in India that sucked in (INVITED) Islamic aggression so easily.

Would Jinnah have dared to utter the obscene word “Pakistan” had he seen Churchill or Shivaji, even Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, facing him, instead?

It was an oft repeated sentence that was heard all over India before Partition, “Jinnah, the “rat”, has become a “cat”, going for the “mouse” called Gandhi, for his meal.”

Today the entire Lok Sabha of Hindusthan, beholden to MK Gandhi, are also behaving like “rats” before yet another “Cat” called SONIA from Italy, making FOOLS of themselves. The new Cat in Bharat has become fat on the wealth of Hindusthan being deposited in foreign banks. Aggrieved & offended, the sulking followers of Gandhi are only capable of doing “Satyagraha” and hoping that Sonia Maino-Gandhi will vanish one day due to natural death.

What sense are “Ahimsa Parmo Dharma” and “Peace at all costs” of MK Gandhi when earlier we had the shining examples of SRI RAM fighting bravely in Sri Lanka, SRI KRISHNA encouraging Arjuna to fight in battle, BANDA SINGH BAHADUR sacking Sarhind to teach the savage ‘killers of infants’ a lesson, GENERAL HARI SINGH NALWA capturing Khyber Pass after defeating the Afghans, SHIVAJI “despatching” Rascal AFZAL KHAN, RANI OF JHANSI distinguishing herself in battles, MAHARANA PRATAP fighting for Hindu sovereignty, and countless other Hindus who FOUGHT against submission, slavery and dishonour but did not sit in “Satyagrahas” till the Muslims were “tamed” and the British had gone, leaving Jawaharlal NEHRU in tears over their departure.

Recalling the speed at which Gandhi forgot the slogan, “AKHAND BHARAT: AMAR RAHE!” but took up the chant of “HINDU MUSLIM BHAI BHAI!” puts him in the category of rats rather than lions. To earn the title of “LION” he had to speak like Winston Churchill, “FIGHT the separatist DEVILS till the end, and DEFEND our MOTHERLAND and SECULARISM to the last.”

Today the powerful ruling establishment in PARTITIONED India, who have vested interests in fooling the Hindus and destroying the country while robbing the natives with both hands, are still busy boosting the Gandhi image, calling him “MAHATMA” while denying the TRUTH that instead of Independence he got us PARTITION and two million DEAD and 15 million REFUGEES.

It took more than a few days to slaughter and wipe out all the Hindus and Sikhs in Pakistan at Partition. What warning or threat did GANDHI deliver to the KILLERS in PAKISTAN to stop the massacres and ensure the safety of the helpless MINORITY there? Did he send the betrayed and besieged HINDUS any support, reinforcements, arms and weapons to defend themselves? Sadly, it was not done even in KASHMIR when it was invaded within days of Partition. Gandhi openly BETRAYED the Hindus and saw them being killed, raped and driven out of their homes, but never mentioned “Exchange of Population”, and never issued any warning to the enemy. He did not realize what the fleeing Hindu refugees expected of him as the top leader of Hindusthan. He was scared and terrified himself. We saw him like a dry leaf that is lifted up high, and tossed about, by the gale force (political) wind in a violent storm.

The man was totally clueless about history, all the countless foreign invasions and the centuries of slavery and, by now, the presence of strongly motivated, united and HOSTILE foreign fifth columns that were deeply entrenched in our soil, who could “eat up” his AKHAND Bharat within days.

ON THE DAY THAT INDIA WAS MUTILATED AND MILLIONS WERE FLEEEING ACROSS THE BORDER, BOTH GANDHI AND NEHRU OUGHT TO HAVE BEEN LYNCHED, MUSSOLINI STYLE, OR SHOT DEAD. Partitioned India, still burdened with the separatist, intolerant and violent Muslims, had NO use of them.

Hindu LEADERS must muster guts even to think if action is still beyond their imagination.

GANDHI’ S legacy is FRONTIER AT WAGAH, NOT AT KHYBER.

HIS legacy is PAKISTAN, not “AKHAND” Bharat.

HIS bequest is the LIMBLESS, WINGLESS GUTLESS SECULAR BHARAT THAT IS ASHAMED TO SEE THE WORD “HINDU” IN CONSTITUTION.

HIS legacy is EXTERMINATION OF HINDUS in EAST BENGAL, NORTH KASHMIR and WEST PUNJAB but SWELLING NUMBERS of MUSLIM IMMIGRANTS and INFILTRATORS in BHARAT.

Who will now save the “REST OF INDIA” from the “KAFIR KILLER DEVILS”, given that the Hindu leaders are as confused, demoralised and docile now in 2012 as they were then in 1947, and worst of all, admire and adore GANDHI but not any hero who wielded sword in battle-field.

Hindu LEADERS like GANDHI cut a sorry figure when AKHAND BHARAT was bleeding and DYING..

They could not prevent the break up of Bharat in 1947.

They could not expel all the treacherous Muslims after Partition in 1947.

They could not ensure the safety of the Hindus in Srinagar, Kashmir.

They could not rally round the SRI RAM TEMPLE, the holiest shrine in Bharat, in order to construct it to its original grandeur and glory to attract tourists and pilgrims from the world.

They could not defend Sri NANKANA SAHIB, the birth place of Guru Nanak Dev that lies in Pakistan.

They cannot even shout, “QUIT INDIA!” at Sonia Maino, the Italian born “First Lady” of Bapu Gandhi’s Hindusthan.

They are watching the INFILTRATION of Muslims from the East and the West passively.

They are watching the ONE-WAY TRAFFIC of naïve Hindu girls converting to Islam on marrying a “MOHAMMED”.

They cannot even secure grants and subsidies for HINDU pilgrims that are given to the Muslims for Hajj.

Not one has dared to shout, “WHAT ARE THE MUSLIMS DOING IN BROKEN BHARAT AFTER PARTITION?”.

Not one has cried, “MK GANDHI’S VERSION OF SECULARISM IN DELHI AND AMRITSAR IS LIKE “COW DUNG” FOR US IF IT IS NOT VALID IN LAHORE AND DHAKA.”

Not one has declared AUGUST 15 the “DAY OF MOURNING” to lament the historic defeat of India in 1947 when she escaped the “MOGUL RULE” only after surrendering one third of surface area of India to the enemy.

Not one has stood up for a HINDU HOLOCAUST MUSEUM in Delhi and Kolkata to remind the people of the world of the barbarities and cruelties, massacres, abductions, rape and the Jezia tax during the ISLAMIC rule over India.

None has yet demanded a free discussion over the absurd, illegal, illogical and non democratic (without Referendum) Partition. Are the slaves blind or timid “rats” not to wish to go to Israel and see the Holocaust Museum in Jerusalem, the one in Prague, the one in in Vilnius and the one in Washington DC?

Given such disgusting REALITY, only a FOOL will say, “OUR COUNTRY’S FRONTIRS AND GRANDCHILDREN ARE SAFE IN GANDHI’S HINDUSTHAN.”

On the birth anniversary of the uninspiring demolished and cowardly MK Gandhi, who was forced to go naked, who was soundly defeated and humiliated by his friend Barrister JINN to force Partition of India in 1947, we can only mourn the fact that his followers still call him “Mahatma”!

==================

**

Ram Gopal`s Diary

Hiralal Gandhi In Kanpur

�Yaadon ke Jharokhe se� (Through the Windows of Memory)

Shivnath Sharma, Page 28-29

(Translated from original Hindi.)

This incident dates back to 1936-37 when I was a student in Kanpur’s DAV college and was preparing for the law examination. I used to live in the college hostel.

Inter-community relations in Kanpur of those times had reached their nadir. People still had fresh in their minds the memories of the big Hindu-Muslim riots. The embers of communal hatred were being fanned by the so-called �community leaders� on both sides.

On one side there was this Maulana Bukhari, fond of giving long speeches, thoroughly quenched in communal venom. People of a certain community used to regularly attend his meetings and encourage him at intervals by shouting incendiary slogans. Typically, these meetings concluded with the bringing of a few persons, purportedly Hindus, on the podium, wishing to embrace Islam. They were made to recite the Kalama (affirmation of faith, required of those embracing Islam), and were thus ceremonially inducted into the ranks of the believers.

Often times, Hindus too used to convene retaliatory meetings, which were equally inciting.

Not only did the authorities make absolutely no effort to curb such gatherings, but in actuality they tacitly encouraged them. The reasons were clear. The independence movement was in full swing, and the calculated policy of the government was to weaken it by keeping Muslims and Hindus in a perpetual state of warfare.

Just about that time Mahatma Gandhi’s son Hiralal Gandhi was making news. Whether it was because of his illustrious father’s indifference towards him, or any other reason, he had fallen into the abyss of degradation. He had become addicted to alcohol and women. His moral character had plummeted to the gutter level. Some Muslim fanatics saw their opportunity to slander the Mahatma, fanned the fires in the son by assisting him in his evil desires. A a prelude, he was coaxed into Islam and given a new name: Abdullah Gandhi. Then he was made a show-piece at Muslim gatherings all over India. Wherever he was exhibited, the Muslim slogan used to be : �Today the son has known the true religion of Islam, tomorrow we shall make Gandhi (M.K.) recite the Kalama.�

How could Kanpur be immune to this malady? As expected, with great fanfare Abdullah Gandhi, alias Hiralal was brought to Kanpur and was show-cased in a mammoth meeting. The same slogans- “The Son Today, the Father Tomorrow” were repeated. Then in accordance with the usual routine of previous meetings, some imposters and hired characters posing as Hindus took the Islamic oath, and were ceremonially inducted into Islam. The meeting then formed into a procession. I had the chance to watch this procession with a few of my friends from a close angle.

The procession was fairly big, and passed raucously through the important thoroughfares of the city, shouting inflammatory slogans. The centerpiece was, of course, Abdullah Gandhi sitting in an open ‘Buggy’ (horse drawn carriage). On either side of him was a man holding him for support because he was heavily drunk. He was wearing a pair of loose pyjamas, black ‘sherwani’ topped by a Sheikh Abdullah style fur cap. His eyes were bloodshot, and he was swinging under the influence. When the procession passed through Moolganj (the red-light district of Kanpur) the scene became hilarious. On both sides of the road, on the balconies and rooftops, the prostitutes turned out to watch the spectacle. Our ‘hero’ Abdullah Gandhi bowing to them, was sending his ‘Salaams’ through the air, which were profusely reciprocated to by the ladies of the night. At one spot, while doing his Salaams, Abdullah lost his balance and rolled to the floor of the carriage. His facilitators somehow lifted him up and put him back in his seat.

Needless to say, my heart filled with grief and indignation over the tragic fall of a great man’s offspring.

==========

Another comment on Gandhi by a patriot:

MAHATAMA GANDHI and JAVAHAR LAAL NAHARU are responsible for the creation of PAAKISTHAAN because of this we HINDUUS and COMING GENERATIONS of every Hinduu are going to suffer for ever ——– before we were suffering because of white Christian British rule now we are suffering because of Catholic Christian SONIA + BROWN INDIAN CHRISTIANS + ANTI HINDUUS EDUCATED IN CONVENT SCHOOLS OF MACAULAY EDUCATION SYSTEM + MUSLIM rule of all together over the defeated, disunited and disoriented Hindus.

=============

CONCLUSION

An honourable leader would have committed suicide out of shame or sense of honour on “leading” the country to defeat & disaster of such horrendous magnitude and strategic defence implications like Partition. Gandhi was not that sort of a leader. A young Maratha patriot had to teach him the responsibilities of a true leader.

Gandhi will also be CURSED by those tens of millions of Hindus who believed in his assurances to stay put in Pakistan but not to escape with their lives in good time despite the approaching black clouds of despotic Islamic rule overhead. In the event most of them were hacked to death or burnt alive.

How long will the curse of Gandhi’s residual national paralysis and cowardice last? As long as a semi literate non-Hindu Italian born female of unknown pedigree and background is seen guiding and advising the “poodle” Prime Minister and Parliament of Hindusthan, AND THE GALLANT ARMY GOES ON WATCHING.

============

Kuru

www.partitionofindia.com

__._,_.___

 

How ‘Religious Defamation’ Laws Would Ban Islam

Written by Raymond Ibrahim   

Wednesday, 26 September 2012

(Note – Insert in italics are byskanda987.)

Front Page Magazine
http://www.copts.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4124&Itemid=1

If films and cartoons defame Islam, the Quran itself defames other religions.

 

As the Islamic world, in the guise of the 57-member state Organization of Islamic Cooperation, continues to push for the enforcement of “religious defamation” laws in the international arena—theoretically developed to protect all religions from insult, but in reality made for Islam—one great irony is lost, especially on Muslims: if such laws would ban movies and cartoons that defame Islam, they would also, by logical extension, have to ban the religion of Islam itself—the only religion whose core texts actively defame other religions.

(There is already a valid reason why Islam can be declared illegal in any kafir country. The reason is – Islam does not approve any democratic government. Islam only accepts Sharia law and constitution. There is no separation of church and state in Islam.  Therefore, the kafirs need to unite and with grass root democratic action ammend the constitution declaring Islam illegal. – Skanda987)

To understand this, consider what “defamation” means. Typical dictionary-definitions include “to blacken another’s reputation” and “false or unjustified injury of the good reputation of another, as by slander or libel.” In Muslim usage, defamation simply means anything that insults or offends Islamic sensibilities.

 

However, to gain traction among the international community, the OIC maintains that such laws should protect all religions from defamation, not just Islam. Accordingly, the OIC is agreeing that any expression that “slanders” the religious sentiments of others should be banned.

What, then, do we do with Islam’s core religious texts—beginning with the Quran itself, which slanders, denigrates and blackens the reputation of other religions? Consider Christianity alone: Quran 5:73 declares that “Infidels are they who say Allah is one of three,” a reference to the Christian Trinity; Quran 5:73 says “Infidels are they who say Allah is the Christ, [Jesus] son of Mary”; and Quran 9:30 complains that “the Christians say the Christ is the son of Allah … may Allah’s curse be upon them!”

 

Considering that the word “infidel” (or kafir) is one of Islam’s most derogatory terms, what if a Christian book or Western movie appeared declaring that “Infidels are they who say Muhammad is the prophet of God—may God’s curse be upon them”? If Muslims would consider that a great defamation against Islam—and they would, with the attendant rioting, murders, etc.—then by the same standard it must be admitted that the Quran defames Christians and Christianity.

 

Similarly, consider how the Christian Cross, venerated among millions, is depicted—is defamed—in Islam: according to canonical hadiths, when he returns, Jesus supposedly will destroy all crosses; and Muhammad, who never allowed the cross in his presence, ordered someone wearing a cross to “take off that piece of idolatry.”

 

What if Christian books or Western movies declared that the sacred things of Islam—say the Black Stone in the Ka’ba of Mecca—are “idolatry” and that Muhammad himself will return and destroy them? If Muslims would consider that defamation against Islam—and they would, with all the attendant rioting, murders, etc.—then by the same standard it must be admitted that the hadith defames the Christian Cross.

 

Here is a particularly odious form of defamation against Christian sentiment, especially to the millions of Catholic and Orthodox Christians. According to Islam’s most authoritative Quranic exegetes, including the revered Ibn Kathir, Muhammad is in paradise married to and having sex with the Virgin Mary.

 

What if a Christian book or Western movie portrayed, say, Muhammad’s wife, Aisha the “Mother of Believers,” as being married to and having sex with a false prophet in heaven? If Muslims would consider that a great defamation against Islam—and they would, with all the attendant rioting, murders, etc.—then by the same standard it must be admitted that Islam’s most authoritative Quranic exegetes defame the Virgin Mary.

 

Nor does such defamation of Christianity occur in Islam’s ancient texts only; modern day Muslim scholars and sheikhs agree that it is permissible to defame Christianity. Qatar-based “Islam Web” even issued a fatwa that legitimizes insulting Christianity.

 

Now consider the wording used by Muslim leaders calling on the U.N. to enforce religious defamation laws in response to the Muhammad film on YouTube, and how these expressions can easily be used against Islam:

 

The OIC “deplored… an offensive and derogatory film on the life of Prophet Muhammad” and “called on the producers to show respect to the religious sentiments held sacred by Muslims and those of other faiths.”

 

But what about the “offensive and derogatory” depictions of Christianity in Islam’s core texts? Are Muslims willing to expunge these from the Quran and hadith, “to show respect to the religious sentiments held sacred … by those of other faiths,” in this case, Christians?

 

Turkish Prime Minister Erodgan said the film “insults religions” (note the inclusive plural) and called for “international legal regulations against attacks on what people [not just Muslims] deem sacred.”

 

Well, what about the fact that Islam “insults religions”—including Judaism and all polytheistic faiths? Should the West call for “international legal regulations against attacks on what people deem sacred,” in the case of Christianity, regulations against Islam’s teachings which attack the sanctity of Christ’s divinity, the Cross, and Virgin Mary?

 

Even Saudi Arabia’s Grand Mufti—who a few months ago called for the destruction of all Christian churches in the Arabian Peninsula (first reported here)—is calling for a “global ban on insults targeting all” religious figures, while the Grand Imam of Egypt’s Al Azhar is calling for “a U.N. resolution outlawing ‘insulting symbols and sanctities of Islam’ and other religions.” Again, they, too, claim to be interested in banning insults to all religions, while ignoring the fact that their own religion is built atop insulting all other religions.

 

And surely this is the grandest irony of all: the “defamation” that Muslims complain about—and that prompts great violence and bloodshed  around the world—revolves around things like movies and cartoons, which are made by individuals who represent only themselves; on the other hand, Islam itself, through its holiest and most authoritative texts, denigrates and condemns—in a word, defames—all other religions, not to mention calls for violence against them (e.g., Quran 9:29).

 

It is this issue, Islam’s perceived “divine” right to defame and destroy, that the international community should be addressing—not silly cartoons and films.

 

From the heart of a Muslim

 

From: devindersingh < >

(Note – The inserts in italics are by Skanda987)

Soon after Partition, Pakistani leaders realised that religious and political Islam would not transform into constitutional Islam that could accommodate all faiths and peoples. The Objectives Resolution passed by the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan in 1949, declared that `sovereignty belongs to Allah’ (not to the people) and the state should enable the Muslims to order their lives in accordance with Islam.

A study by Aparna Pande, a scholar at the well-known Hudson Institute, in the US, says that this very objective “gave rise to a central question that has bedeviled Pakistan ever since its creation: If Islam is to be the basis of the state, whose Islam will be followed and how?” Whose Islam? Are there many, diverse, Islams? Yes.

The report of the judicial commission (1954) headed by Pakistan’s Chief Justice Munir to inquire into the large-scale violence against the Ahmedia sect put the issue `whose Islam’ pithily thus:

– no two of the several Ulamas are `agreed on’ what is Islam;

– a person who is a Muslim under the definition given by one Ulama, will be kafir according to every other Ulama; and

– no new definition is possible as any definition that `differs from that given by all others’ will be `out of the fold of Islam’.

QED: Islam prescribes One God, but there is no One Islam.

In their blind anti-Hindu rage, Muslims of undivided India created Islamic Pakistan which, they now find they cannot keep up nor give up. After Partition, Pakistan’s diverse inhabitants had no `common identity that might bind them together’ and Pakistan has `struggled with this lack of a common identity and principle ever since’, says the Hudson study.

Hans Morgenthau, a leading 20th century scholar on international politics, said prophetically in 1956 itself:

“Pakistan is not a nation and hardly a state, with no justification in history, ethnic origin, language, civilisation, or the consciousness of its population…it is hard to see how anything but a miracle…will assure Pakistan’s future.”

The dilemma of Pakistan is brilliantly captured by a Pakistani scholar, Waheed-uz-Zaman, in 1973:

“If we let go the ideology of Islam, we cannot hold together as a nation by any other means…. If the Arabs, the Turks, the Iranians, god forbid, give up Islam, the Arabs yet remain Arabs, the Turks remain Turks, the Iranians remain Iranians, but what do we remain if we give up Islam?”

Authentic translations of Koran and Hadith, the Books of Islam, are available in English and other languages. The printing press, internet, and cell phones allow us to spread the messages of Koran or any other Book. No need to rely on mullahs to evaluate what Islam is.

Based o the quotes I have read and collected at https://skanda987.wordpress.com/category/islam/

I clearly see that Islam in almost any form or sect is not tolerant of any other faith in the world. Islam teaches follower to not rest till the whole world’s land and lives are under Islam and sharia. There is no ‘separation of church and state (SCS)’ (religion and politics or social lives) in Islam. The 1400 years of history of Islam supports this view strongly. The history shows that wherever Islam invades or enters, there is no peace.

Islam has spread mostly by invasions and forcible conversions, and by producing children with four wives like pigs and forcing Islam on the children. Islam does not approve a democratic government. For this reason all the non-Muslim countries need to declare Islam illegal.

The creation of Pakistan is in accordance of the agenda of Islam and the foolishness of the Hindu politicians of the time 1947 in Bhaarat. Since 1000 years the Hindus have been thinking that they can assimilate Muslims as they did Parsis or Jews in Bhaarat, the Vedic land. While Gandhi did not read Koran, and assumed Islam is a god religion, Jinnah clearly said in 1947 that Islam is not compatible with the Hindu dharma, and asked for a separate Muslim state. This (that the Islam is barbaric and not tolerant) becomes very clear when you read Koran and Bhagavad Gita that is well known as the Book of Hindu (Vedic) dharma.

The Vedic dharma is universal religion for mankind, and is tolerant of all the tolerant faiths. Forgetting that, the Hindus foolishly have kept tolerating the intolerant and forcibly invaded religion Islam. This is a cause of the creation of Pakistan.

So, if the Hindus do not wake up now and make Bhaarat a Vedic state (not a ‘secular” one), then the Vedic dharma and sanskriti are doomed. We the Vedics valued the Vedic heritage since millenniums, and have carried forward this precious heritage for mankind till now; and it can vanish from its cradle (Bhaarat) and the world just in 50-100 years if we do not make Bhaarat a Vedic state. It can vanhsi because the anti-Vedic forces are brutal, organized, and well funded and named. To counter, we need to unite, organize, and put our money and efforts to save dharma. It is called dharma because it is universal religion for mankind.

Jai sri Krishna! – Skanda987)

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/strategic-geopolitical-issues/201538-pakistan-s-existential-crisis.html#ixzz25rcA4as2

 

From: balayogi venkataraman < >

OUTSTANDING U.S. HISTORIAN CALLS BRITISH RULE IN INDIA GREATEST CRIME IN ALL HISTORY

I was a school boy in Karachi when I first heard the name of Katherine Mayo, notorious author of a viciously anti-India book, titled Mother India. Mahatma Gandhi had condemned the book as a “gutter inspector’s report”!

Mayo was an American journalist who wrote this book around 1927, stoutly defending British Rule in India. She also vehemently attacked Hindu society, religion and culture.

About the same time, I heard of two other American authors who had written almost as passionately in favour of India and against the Britishers. The first of these, Will Durant, had the reputation of being one of the world’s greatest historians, and philosophers. The other was a Church leader, Rev. Jabez Thomas Sunderland.

Will Durant’s life time achievement is his eleven volume series “The Story of Civilisation” a monumental set of volumes written in collaboration with his wife Ariel. Will and Ariel were awarded the Pulitzer Prize for General Non-fiction in 1968.

Will Durant’s other largely popular work, The Story of Philosophy, brought philosophy to the lay person.

On his first visit to India in 1896, Sunderland met Justice Mahadev Govind Ranade and Bengali Nationalist Surendra Nath Bannerji. He was the first American to attend an annual session of the Indian National Congress.

I recall reading around 1945 a very powerful book of his, India in Bondage. Gandhiji and Rabindra Nath Tagore wrote to him letters of gratitude. The book was banned in India by the British Government.

Not many may be aware that when the British came to India in the eighteenth century this country was politically weak but economically very wealthy.

This wealth, wrote Sunderland in the above book, was created by the Hindus’ vast and varied industries.

“India was a far greater industrial and manufacturing nation than any in Europe or than any other in Asia.  Her textile goods – the fine products of her looms, in cotton, wool, linen and silk – were famous over the civilized world; so were her exquisite jewelry and her precious stones cut in every lovely form; so were her pottery, porcelains, ceramics of every kind, quality, color and beautiful shape; so were her fine works in metal – iron, steel, silver and good.  She had great architecture – equal in beauty to any in the world. She had great engineering works. She had great merchants, great businessmen, great bankers and financiers. Not only was she the greatest ship-building nation, but she had great commerce and trade by land and sea which extended to all known civilized countries. Such was the India which the British found when they came.

 

**

 

I have, however, come upon lately a short book written by William Durant in 1930 titled “The Case for India”, but which had been out of print for many decades. Strand Book Stall of Mumbai and its Founder T.N. Shanbagh have done signal service to history by procuring a photo copy of Durant’s book from Mohandas Pai of Infosys and having it republished in 2007.

 

In his introductory note to his “The Case for India”, Durant writes:

 

“I went to India to help myself visualize a people whose cultural history I had been studying for The Story of Civilisation…

“But I saw such things in India as made me feel that study and writing were frivolous things in the presence of a people-one-fifth of the human race – suffering poverty and oppression bitterer than any to be found elsewhere on the earth. I was horrified. I had not thought it possible that any government could allow its subjects to sink to such misery.

“I came away resolved to study living India as well as the India with the brilliant past; to learn more of this unique Revolution that fought with suffering accepted but never returned; to read the Gandhi of today as well as the Buddha of long ago. And the more I read the more I was filled with astonishment and indignation at the apparently conscious and deliberate bleeding of India by England throughout a hundred and fifty years. I began to feel that I had come upon the greatest crime in all history.” (Emphasis added)

Durant refers extensively to Sunderland’s writings and says that “those who have seen the unspeakable poverty and physiological weakness of the Hindus today will hardly believe that it was the wealth of eighteenth century India which attracted the commercial pirates of England and France”.

 

It was this wealth that the East India Company proposed to appropriate, Durant says.  Already in 1686 the East India Company’s Directors declared their intention to “establish …a large, well-grounded, sure English dominion in India for all time to come”.

 

 

 

In 1757, Robert Clive defeated the Rajah of Bengal at Plassey and declared his Company the owner of the richest province in India. Durant adds: Clive added further territory by forging and violating treaties, by playing one native prince against another, and by generous bribes given and received. Four million dollars were sent down the river to Calcutta in one shipment. He accepted “presents” amounting to $ 1,170,000 from Hindu rulers dependent upon his favour and his guns; pocketed from them, in addition, an annual tribute of $ 140,000; took to opium, was investigated and exonerated by Parliament, and killed himself.  “When I think”, he said, “of the marvelous riches of that country, and the comparatively small part which I took away, I am astonished at my own moderation”. Such were the morals of the men who proposed to bring civilization to India.

 

India-analysts often talk very disparagingly about India’s caste-system. Will Durant, however, used the casteist metaphor to substantiate his condemnation of British dominion over India as the greatest crime in all history.

 

Under sub-heading “The Caste System in India” Durant writes :

 

“The present caste system in India consists of four classes: the real Brahmans i.e. the British bureaucracy; the real Kshatriyas i.e. the British army; the real Vaisyas i.e. the British traders; and the real Sudras and Untouchables i.e. the Hindu people.”

 

After dealing with the first three castes the author writes:

 

“The final element in the real caste system of India is the social treatment of the Hindus by the British. The latter may be genial Englishmen when they arrive, gentlemen famous as lovers of fair play; but they are soon turned, by the example of their leaders and the poison of irresponsible power, into the most arrogant and over-bearing bureaucracy on earth. “Nothing can be more striking,” said a report to Parliament, in 1830, “than the scorn with which the people have been practically treated at the hands of even those who were actuated by the most benevolent motives”. Sunderland reports that the British treat the Hindus as strangers and foreigners in India, in a manner “quite as unsympathetic, harsh and abusive as was ever seen among the Georgia and Louisiana planters in the old days of American slavery”.

 

Durant then quotes Gandhiji saying that the foreign system under which India was governed had reduced Indians to “pauperism and emasculation”.

 

Durant comments “As early as 1783 Edmund Burke predicted that the annual drain of Indian resources to England without equivalent return would eventually destroy India. From Plassey to Waterloo, fifty-seven years, the drain of India’s wealth to England is computed by Brooks Adams at two-and-a-half to five billion dollars. Macaulay suggested long ago, that it was this stolen wealth from India which supplied England with free capital for the development of mechanical inventions, and so made possible the Industrial Revolution.”

 

Will Durant wrote his book “The case for India” in 1930. When some time later the book was noticed by Rabindranath Tagore, he wrote an article in the Modern Review of March, 1931 warmly complimenting Will Durant, and Tagore observed: “I was surprised when I noticed in Will Durant’s book a poignant note of pain at the suffering and indignity of the people who are not his kindred. I know that the author will have a small chance of reward in popularity from his readers and his book may even run the risk of being proscribed to us, not having the indecency to deal with an unwholesome calumny against the people who are already humiliated by their own evil fortune. But he, I am sure, has his noble compensation in upholding the best tradition of the West in its championship of freedom and fair play.”

 

TAILPIECE

 

William Durant and Ariel Durant shared a love story as remarkable as their scholarship. In October, 1981, William fell ill, and was taken to the hospital. After he was hospitalized, Ariel stopped eating. On October 25, she died. When William learnt that Ariel had died, he passed away on November 7.

 

L.K. Advani

 

New Delhi

 

15 July, 2012

 

From: <MoorthyM@comcast.net>

I thought in this poignant moment of the exodus of beleaguered NE Indians from the Indian (read, Hindu) heartland, the following poem captures the moment so appropriately.

First they came for Punjabi / Sindhi / Bangladeshi non-Muslims

But I did not speak out,
Because I was not a Punjabi / Sindhi / Bangladeshi non-Muslim

Then they came for the Kashmiri non-Muslims
And I did not speak out,
Because I was not a Kashmiri non-Muslim

Then they came for the Jammu / Ladakhi non-Muslims
And I did not speak out,
Because I was not a Jammu / Ladakhi non-Muslim

Then they came for the Assamese non-Muslims
And I did not speak out,
Because I was not a Assamese non-Muslim

Then they came for the West Bengali non-Muslims
And I did not speak out,
Because I was not a West Bengali non-Muslim

Then they came for the Nepali non-Muslims
And I did not speak out,
Because I was not a Nepali non-Muslim

Then they came for me,
And there was no one left to speak out for me.

The poem can be found here: http://www.saveindia.com/poems.htm

It’s a pity, because we now know how radical Islam operates in India (and elsewhere). We know its weak points, and in my view, its powerbase in India can be neutralized within two years and the flock liberated within the next 10 years, permanently.

Far-reaching measures can be justified under the human rights umbrella that non-Muslims have the right to live safely in South Asia in light of the Islamic partitioning of 1947, and that can only be India. India has every right to liberate its certain minorities from genocidal and non-functioning ideologies and provide a future for them.

India will likely unravel quickly under the radical Islamic onslaught from within and without, if the armed forces of India do not recognize the limitations of the system of governing and that of its political leadership.

http://www.moorthymuthuswamy.com/